Can we have an 'anything goes' thread?

Can we have an 'anything goes' thread?

Do people really want that back?

but you wouldn't know it from discussions like this one. To discourage trolling, suspensions for breaking the moderation policy have been expanded from 14 to 21 days.

"this one"

Wow. What a trashy thread that was.

Do people really want that back?

Put it on the back page.

"Do people really want that back?"

Absolutely not.

Wow. What a trashy thread that was.

Do people really want that back?

I thought www.cruel.com use to kind of served that purpose. Perhaps it's time to resurrect that site, with strong disclaimers of "anything goes", similar to the disclaimers on porn sites before reaching the front page.

served=serve

Can we have an 'anything goes' thread?

#1 | Posted by wurster at 2009-10-18 07:01 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Fair question Rogers. When Hans & I interviewed you I asked you the same question, mentioned the demand for an old style Retort thread. You said you would consider it, but it seems to have died.

We should vote,

Should we have an anything goes thread?

Briwo-Yes

What's the value to an anything goes format?
Frankly, the less anonimity the better. People behave better. This place is enough of a schoolyard without dropping the moderation policy as it stands.

aye

One thread, not the whole site.

"hould we have an anything goes thread?"

If you create one it should be named the twelve year old boy wannabe thread, a place I will never go I can assure you. Some posters are actually funny with off color humor but most seem like adolescents talking dirty and thinking it is clever. Usually, it is the farthest thing from clever and borders on seriously pathetic.

One thread unmod is a good idea (within reason). People need to blow off a little steam once in a while. I personally thought 14 days was fine. If you go beyond 21 days expect people to create 2nd accounts and to post behind proxies to post with a 2nd acct. The unmod should have a few rules. No violent threats and no posting of real life info. If you want to go off on somebody that should fair game in the unmod thread. Some people are retarded idiots and should be told so.

"To discourage trolling, suspensions for breaking the moderation policy have been expanded from 14 to 21 days."

Has someone written you an email recently complaining about the moderation policy? If so, I think I can guess who in two tries.

You should probably hire an assistant. A media studies major from a local school, and have them live on the recent comments page.

Or hire two assistants, and moderate from the front end, not allowing any post to appear that hasn't been approved before hand.

I vote for the former, if something must be done. Having a comment appear in the thread immediately is indespensible to the flow of the conversation.

It can be the rebirth of the gooner thread. Even once a week will work. Friday night Gooner thread

An anything goes thread would be impossible to maintain. And it wouldn't encourage anyone to behave themselves on the other threads.

Nay.

People need to grow a little thicker skin. Some of the dumps seem really harmless to me. I wonder if these people cry in real life when they get insulted?

In the old days everyones user name was visitor.

You had to sign your posts. Of course everyone started spoofing everyone else.

It would get pretty damn funny sometimes. After awhile you couldn't tell who the hell you were exchanging witicisms with.

Some posters here have real talent for spoofing other posters and really nailing the character.

If there is an unmoderated thread, what's to stop someone from posting someone's personal info?

One member has been constantly saying he wants unmoderated threads to do just that.

I dont think it's a good idea to have anything here unmoderated.

a place I will never go I can assure you

That's part of the point.

Has someone written you an email recently complaining about the moderation policy?

Probably Chairhomo 101. Everyone knows he's a whiny limp wristed little bitch.

If you want to make him cry, just kick him right in the cunt.

If there is an unmoderated thread, what's to stop someone from posting someone's personal info?

As Jackass said above, with in reason. Personal info and threats are obviously of limits.

I dont think it's a good idea to have anything here unmoderated.

#21 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-18 08:10 PM | Reply

Oh c'mon, stop being such a girl. You can hang with the boys and give as good as you get.

"Oh c'mon, stop being such a girl"

Last I checked that's what I was, Bri.

LOL

You can hang with the boys and give as good as you get.
#25 | Posted by briwo at 2009-10-18 08:13 PM

No she can't. She apologizes too easily. Sometimes in advance.

Lisa will go off on a tirade of insults and expect it to be ignored but when someone says anything negative to her she throws up how she is more devout than the pope and starts to flag away. She is the definition of a hypocrite.

"Has someone written you an email recently complaining about the moderation policy?"
Probably Chairhomo 101. Everyone knows he's a whiny limp wristed little bitch.
#23 | Posted by briwo

Not who I was thinking of. Sombebody lately has been screaming bloody murder about the trolls whom it seems he has no ability to ignore.

Weird. I've never seen Lisa go off on a tirade of insults. Get righteously indignant, yes, but tirade of insults?

Of course, I've not been here as long as, well, pretty much all of you.

"If there is an unmoderated thread, what's to stop someone from posting someone's personal info?
One member has been constantly saying he wants unmoderated threads to do just that."

Yeah, that freaks me out too.

But don't worry, he was probably just off his meds those days.

Of course, I've not been here as long as, well, pretty much all of you.

#30 | Posted by pragmatist at 2009-10-18 08:19 PM | Reply | Flag: tirelessly making up for lost time.

Prag:

First of all, there was a time when I DID dish it out as good as I got it. However, that really wasn't me, so I decided to just be myself and enjoy coming here much better.

Righteously indignant???

I don't get angry. I have called a spade a spade, but it isn't done with anger.

I never find any of the comments made here to be offensive enough to flag, but I have pretty thick skin. The few people here that are offensive, I think are offensive on purpose to get a reaction. Most of the DR users take this forum pretty seriously and try to keep themselves in check, which can be hard sometimes given the responses one gets for simply disagreeing with another person's opinion. Which is funny, seeing as it IS a current affairs "opinion" blog. I spouted off one drunken night and got banned, and I deserved it...

But, I suppose that if there are those that are that offended by the statements of others. Or, if you just doesn't want to see the sh%t on your website, then who's to argue; it's your site and we are just the users that benefit from the freely provided access...

So, whatever you think is good, is good. And, I'll stay within the bounds of reason, or expect to get booted...

So, thanks for the access (it really is a fun site with a bunch of great people). And, thanks for the heads-up; it's always good to know where the boundaries are...

Those who want to troll without encountering a moderator should try the alt.politics groups on USENET.

My first reaction is that an unmoderated thread might be fun. It might be fun reading some of the posts.

However, the more I think about it, the less I think it should ever happen.

Nay.

It's always the bad apples that spoil the bunch.

We had unmoderated threads at one time. They were stopped for a reason.

I think opening up unmoderated threads again is just beggin' for trouble.

"That's part of the point."

Sweetie, I was here back in the old unmoderated days and took more abuse than perhaps any poster here....ever. Like others say though, there was some funny stuff too, even the abuse was usually pretty clever, not the bull shit that passes for risque humor here now. THat was why I kept coming here, it was intelligent, that is what is getting lame. I don't think most people, even the women, mind dirty jokes, clever put downs, etc. but it has to be funny. Sorry, most that is posted now just doesn't measure up. There are still a few who are funny, I will never deny 101 is one and he loves to put me down, but he is actually pretty clever and funny when he does. The clumsy immitators though are, like I said before, 12 year old boys talking dirty.

I wasn't talking about you personally Danni. I meant if you don't have any interest in going there than don't. That's part of the point.

If there is an unmoderated thread, what's to stop someone from posting someone's personal info?
One member has been constantly saying he wants unmoderated threads to do just that.

That's a pretty concise argument for why it should never happen.

How about not unmoderated but relaxed rules?

I thought www.cruel.com use to kind of served that purpose. Perhaps it's time to resurrect that site, with strong disclaimers of "anything goes", similar to the disclaimers on porn sites before reaching the front page.

Friday night relaxed rules thread.

When there is a lack of important political news the frustration level rises, leading to pointless bickering among political junkies. Come on politicians, do something!

That's a pretty concise argument for why it should never happen.

#41 | Posted by rcade

As much as I love you, I'd definitely be willing to spend money on attorneys to be sure you had to spend money on attorneys if my personal information ever came out on the DR.

Was that a threat?

I don't know.

Just a statement of fact?

Maybe.

Was that a joke?

Is it funny?

Hag how is it RCADE's fault if somebody throws up your personal info? Sue the poster not RCADE. If I did it good luck because you won't get shit.

As much as I love you, I'd definitely be willing to spend money on attorneys to be sure you had to spend money on attorneys if my personal information ever came out on the DR.

I won't release personal information about a user of my sites without a court order. I get a couple requests a year just to hand over information, and I reject them.

"Hag how is it RCADE's fault if somebody throws up your personal info? Sue the poster not RCADE."

Are you kidding? I'm from NYC. Sue everyone is our motto. To be used only as a nuclear option. Hell, I think I'll even sue bibble and chair to make it non-partisan-like.

"If I did it good luck because you won't get shit."

Ahh, but it would cost you just to defend yourself, wouldn't it? Sometimes that's all the reward you can expect. I'm cool with that

But seriously, lighten up, I'm just making jokes.

But don't do it Jacko, that mierada is just wrong.

Okay, Rcade. It is one thing to link "like this one" and an entirely different thing to tell us what about "this one" you think is abusive.
I, for one, notice when I post an honest opinion you, tosser or danforth think the opinion is "abusive" and that's the end of all discussion.
Ever imagine, rcade, in your wildest dreams(!), someone might think YOU are full of shit? Ever consider the rational possibility you actually MIGHT be full of shit?
Just a humble suggestion.....since you assume anyone disagreeing with you is full of shit and "abusive".....

"tosser or danforth think the opinion is "abusive""

It ain't me, babe.

Obviously someone else thinks some of your hate isn't appropriate.

I get a couple requests a year just to hand over information....

Only a couple? From whom? What kind of poster would publish stuff that warrants a knock on the door from the black suits?

I used to have to weed out the porn sharers on my opennap, and it seemed to be such a chore, but to have to deal with law enforcement isn't anybody's cup of tea.

I've said some stupid things, but only in good fun.

"Ever imagine, rcade, in your wildest dreams(!), someone might think YOU are full of shit? Ever consider the rational possibility you actually MIGHT be full of shit?
Just a humble suggestion.....since you assume anyone disagreeing with you is full of shit and "abusive".....

#50 | Posted by Diablo"

Ever imagine, diablow, in your wildest dreams (!), that you can start your own fucking site where you could make the rules?
Just a humble suggestion....since you assume anyone here gives a flying fuck what you think.....

Yes, rcade - it is difficult at best to become a classy establishment with the type of comments in that party cooler post. You would be better off trying to herd dust bunnies than try to get this motley crew to behave better.

There - may I take the helm of moderation?

HA! I only flag manyputz and his faultyego, tarkanian.

"Just a humble suggestion.....since you assume anyone disagreeing with you is full of shit and "abusive"....."

As one of the most ridiculous posters on the site Diablo, I'm not surprised that you have a disagreement with Rcade on this topic. Rcade is limited by his being a normal human being while you are not.

It's a catch-22 thing. Rcade is responsible, yet he isn't. It's his site, but he has disclaimers. I wouldn't want to be in his shoes.

The Retort is a thing of beauty, tho. Good work Rcade.

The Retort is a thing of beauty, tho. Good work Rcade.
#56 | Posted by dxlingr

100%

Think of it as the "Retort Constitution" - ever living - ever breathing - ever changing...suited to fit the times so to speak. ::smirk::

SUCK IT UP TORTIES!

Except for funny flags, the only flag I have given in at least a year was one abusive flag for somebody that smothered a thread to death with cut and paste spam.

I love to read the funny comments.

In some cases, I dont' think 21 days is enough.

For instance, it's been very peaceful here without Gimme.

I wonder if Rcade gave him 30??

Well in my humble opinion some things will be worth a 30 day vacation I've hardly got a chance to enjoy the cuisine offered in the Drudge Prison during my recent stay

"As one of the most ridiculous posters on the site Diablo, I'm not surprised that you have a disagreement with Rcade on this topic. Rcade is limited by his being a normal human being while you are not."

Now, danni! I have several times agreed with you so I guess you share with me being a 'ridiculous' poster. I also have many times complimented rcade for this website and defended his standards. I posted what I did above in the strained hope rcade might wake up some day to objectivity rather than marinate himself in left-wing cliched thought.
Maybe someday.....he lives in Texas so there is hope....
By the way, you think being normal is "limited"?????

and here I thought all the threads were unmoderated.. ;)

#61

Darn...spoke too soon.

The threads should be either FAIRLY moderated or unmoderated one or the other there's too many in betweens

#63 | Posted by Legio at 2009-10-18 10:33 PM

I thought that too...

Found out different...

;~}

#61

Darn...spoke too soon.

#64 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-18 10:36 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Missed Gimme More Than Rcade Did

Okay, rcade! I get the message. If I post every Catholic priest wants to sodomize young boys because the doctrine of the Church is so satanic....that post is "reasonable" and "a healthy exchange of ideas in a democratic forum."
If I post "mohammed was a fraud who in his sixth decade of life porked a nine year-old," that is rcade's threshold of 'abusive' thought and earns banishment.
Likewise, nasty anti-religious posts made on multiple threads will not be considered spamming. But post something like "if smokers are taxed extra because they cost more, so should gay males be taxed" on more than one thread: bingo! That is "spam."
Rcade? Ever set yourself a standard? I mean, an objective standard, not a "this will make my cocktail party friends love me" standard?

"#64 | Posted by Lisa at 2009-10-18 10:36 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Missed Gimme More Than Rcade Did"

#67 | Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch at 2009-10-18 10:40 PM | Reply | Flag:OBVIOUSLY HIS BRAIN IS STILL ON VACATION

Personally, I think Rcade should let ME moderate his site!!!

Since this site does sort of lean a bit to the left how about a trolling tax.

Lisa, I think rcade needs a real martini. Straight up, gin, very dry, olive. He needs to smoke a Macanudo #3. He needs to stop believing in the New Deal, New Frontier and global warming.
Rcade needs to be morphed into a true American jaded male. Rcade needs Lisa and Diablo to reshape him for the future....change....hope.....

LOL Diablo...wouldn't that be fun!!

The threads should be either FAIRLY moderated or unmoderated one or the other there's too many in betweens

#65 | Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch

That raises an interesting question. Its a fine line for rcade, i.e. what constitutes fair moderation. If he leaves it up to the participants to flag posts to his attention, then the site falls victim to the serial flaggers, but to leave the site unmoderated leaves it unworkable.

So in the end, it's a judgement call. The site is called Drudge RETORT: Read Meat for Yellow Dogs. So expect moderation policy to be in line with the sites stated purpose. But seriously, the moderation policy is extremely fair here. First of all, its done back-end style, which means that you can make your point, even if for a while, before it gets deleted.

Second of all, he reads all our emails, so I believe that he takes any complaints into consideration, but again, the purpose of this site is to be left-leaning, a retort of MD. But seriously, I think that, OVER ALL, you guys nit-pick, to a degree, about Rogers' moderation style. You guys get away with tons of ridiculous b.s. If you didn't, you wouldn't come back, right? WHY would you?

I will arm wrestle Lisa for moderation rights! I will ruin her french manicure!

*8]

AND-AND-AND mess her hair up if given the chance!

#74 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine - ordinary posters actually E-MAIL rcade? Who'd've thought?!?

HC:

I was just playing around.

I think RCADE is more than fair There have been only a couple of deleted posts I've read where I thought HUH?!

I have no complaints really.

Nanc...I said I did my own so that manicure can take a lickin'.

But I would put your arm through the table anyway so no need to worry about my manicure!!

Mess my hair???

YOU WOULDN'T DARE!!!

lol

BTW..can I use both arms?

BRING IT, GIRLY-GIRL! HA!

LOL

I AM a girly girl.

I confess!!

yes, if I can use both arms and a pair of vice grips?

I think, in rcade's defense, he owns the website and should have no qualms about censoring/banishing. C'mon! It belongs to the (I assume) dude.
I also think rcade tries to be fair, which probably invades much more of his time than the demands of making a living require. More power to him for being that concerned about us vermin.
I have yet to be upset, insulted or "hurt" (whatever that means) by rcade telling me to take a hike. I am puzzled by his standards but remain on his side as far as how he decides banishment.
Rcade: don't lose sleep over us, okay? I really want to lift a few Shiners in the Gruene Dance Hall with you some day if I make it back to Texas and then and there Lisa and I will reshape you into a hetero gun nut who wants to invade Tibet in order to spread the truth of Christ.
I think it will be in 2012......

Then the wrestle will be evenly matched because I am a girly-girl too!

OH....you can bring a vice grip.

I'll put your head in it!

I'll use it to straighten out your curly hair!!

#83 | Posted by Diablo - no, rcade's a girl. A masculine sort of girl.

I AM a girly girl.

#85 | Posted by Lisa - IF you could straighten THIS hair I'd gladly turn moderation rights over to you! Don't argue with me on this!

#87 - like WE didn't know that about you!

OMGosh Null...that brings back memories!!!

In choir we did a medly of show tunes. I sang that song during it.

I had a blast!! LOL

My director said it was between that and Buttercup.

I'm SOOOO glad I didn't have to sing that one. What a boring song!!

Mine isn't that curly, Nanc.

I feel for ya!

Mine's bad enough.

I AM a girly girl.

I confess!!

#81 | Posted by Lisa

Link?

Listening to Nanc and Lisa makes me glad I am too old for those blue pills to make a difference. We guys stand no chance.....

#92

Sure do.

I'll post mine right after you post yours showing you're a human being.

We are both married Diablo. But that was kinda sweet.

And no Gimme...we are not married to each other.

I know how that twisted brain of yours works.

You're so twisted you have to screw your hat on!

#93 | Posted by Diablo - besides that, where would we send the ambooooolamps?

Nancy Kwan is hot! If I was married to that my hands would be glued to that ass...

"Nancy Kwan is hot! If I was married to that my hands would be glued to that ass..."

Careful Null...remember JeffJ said something simular.

LOL

Ever imagine, rcade, in your wildest dreams(!), someone might think YOU are full of shit? Ever consider the rational possibility you actually MIGHT be full of shit?

There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that I'm full of shit.

The Retort is a thing of beauty, tho. Good work Rcade.

Thanks. I enjoy how this place turned out.

Nancy Kwan is truly hot. I especially like the rotary telephone that reminds me she probably wears grampers/pampers these days....
And Lisa, if you and Nanc are not married to one another what the heck are you doing posting at the Retort?? This place has standards, y'know. Rcade might not enforce them but I, Diablo, will!

"Careful Null...remember JeffJ said something simular."

Yeah. I was actually thinking of that when I composed that sentence. Thanks for the warning, though...

I left a comment for you on a different thread, Null

It should have been here.

I don't know how that happened.

And one blonde comment and someone's gonna get it!!!

"To discourage trolling, suspensions for breaking the moderation policy have been expanded from 14 to 21 days."

Rcade is a true socialist. This is the first place I ever wuz done offered a three-week vacation.

Diablo - we are married to MEN! MANLY MEN!

HOLY COW! Vernon really stepped in it:

I will report you to rcade immediately for that perversion, Nanc. How dare you impose your morality on the retort.

And one blonde comment and someone's gonna get it!!!

#102 | Posted by Lisa

What's the first thing a blonde does after having sex?

She opens the car door.

See, you're wrong again, Null.

The guy ALWAYS opens the car door after that!

Geesh!

If the blond is Dan Quayle, the first thing is to ask what just happened.

And no Gimme...we are not married to each other.

I know how that twisted brain of yours works.

You're so twisted you have to screw your hat on!

#95 | Posted by Lisa

Nice try but I don't use condoms

There are definitely a handful of idiots (to be polite) who do little but troll threads trying to bait other posters with awfully nasty comments they'd never say to someone's face in the real world.

HOLY COW! Vernon really stepped in it:

www.drudge.com

#105 | Posted by nanc

Talk about mixed messages: A week or two ago he was going on about what a Christian he is. Maybe he'll do a little soul searching the next 3 weeks and find a spark of decency and start practicing what he preaches.

I think fhe only flags should be funny flags.

Having said that,I think that with each banishment two fingers should be cut off,after 5 you're pretty much shit out of luck

Having said that,I think that with each banishment two fingers should be cut off,after 5 you're pretty much shit out of luck

Posted by bruceaz at 2009-10-19 01:22 AM | Reply

Why is that?? You can always tape on a stick to Your fingerless palm and type with that?? Or do like that one guy did on Highway To Heaven and type with a stick in Your mouth. Hell they even have ways where You can think it and it will type it for You. Oh and let's not forget about typing with ones toes.

Larry

A stick in the mouth will at least slow them down,lol

You can think it and it will type it for You

I'm not to worried about thinkers.

Anyway,like I said funnyflags only is OK with me.

Your a pretty decent fellow,doubt you've ever been banned.

I only worry when we get to points such as offending religions - when it comes to personal beliefs, it's easy to get offended, telling someone their belief system is a load of crap, which most religions in essence, are saying to eachother is often attacking the very basis of their worldview. Yet, what if they are wrong? What if the views represented by their religion are getting dragged into the public forum by their ability to vote and influence others? Is religious relativism a good or bad thing? I think the only trolling that really needs to be watched is direct personal attacks. No reason to be that way, and it's distracting from the main subject.

Just my 2 cents.

21 days is too long. People quit crying to RCADE and let's go back to 14.

I think the only trolling that really needs to be watched is direct personal attacks.

I agree basically,but I for one am getting tired of the Mohammed was a pedophile posts

I agree. Those posts were getting out of bounds, and quite old, as well. I would just hate to see good honest debates on the validty of certain beliefs/views held by religions thrown completely by the wayside, though I doubt Rcade will actually do that unless they are getting personal or obscene regarding them.

I would also hate to give up my raving atheistic ways in conversation. Some of my most treasured moments with others even in real life involved heated debates with my pentecostal mother, who was actually well-educated as well as went to seminary and all kinds of such religious training, or with a good friend of mine who happens to be muslim. We insult the hell out of eachother. I try to feed him bacon, and he tells me I'm dirty and probably have worms. We meet again for coffee the next week.

I like for this place to be the same.

What you all don't see is that we have some people on here that are such crybabies they will flag everything in attempts to get a poster flagged for anything.

I personally would rather dish out a few insults back and move on.

The whiners remind me of the class snitches. They would instigate shit and run to the teacher when matters got heated.

This blog is not exactly the acme of polite political discourse. It never will be. People who argue politics with strangers on the internet are not looking for enlightenment.

The trolling and the insults have always been part of the board. Why force a change that will not work?

I would also hate to give up my raving atheistic ways in conversation.
I like for this place to be the same.

me too,atheistic as well.But I love to discuss religion.And if we go to heavan,I'll be pleasantly surprised.
I never hear a moslem denigrating Jesus here though.

BRUCE

The flags are these to make Rcade's job of playground monitor easier. We take the load off him by moderating each other, so to speak.

A few juveniles here have tried to turn the "dump/suspended' policy into a badge of honor . . . as if they've earned their bones by being suspended.

If this new 21 days doesn't work, I'd like to see a a six month suspension for the habitual offenders . . . with "habitual" left to the discretion of Rcade. We all know who they are anyway so six months in the cooler with a dunce cap on won't come as a surprise to anyone.

Rogers is as fair and patient as any site owner I've ever known. But he also knows when his site is being damaged . . . when the bad starts to outweigh the benefits. That's whats happening right now.

I'm not convinced that 21 days will solve anyone's social problems but it's a step in the right direction.

Glad to see most here don't want a nanny state to come about here. Sadly the whiners seem to have Rcade's ear at the moment.

I'm not convinced that 21 days will solve anyone's social problems but it's a step in the right direction.
#123 | Posted by Twinpac at 2009-10-19 02:45 AM |

Twin ok be brave for a change and name the most egregious offenders. Don't stand behind a flag, call these people out.

Glad to see most here don't want a nanny state to come about here. Sadly the whiners seem to have Rcade's ear at the moment.

#124 | Posted by jackass at 2009-10-19 02:46 AM | Reply | Flag:

It's precisely because of you and rex zeitgeist that we even have a damn moderation policy. So shut the fuck up, jackass.

Twinpac people would just create new handles to get a round a six month suspension. Just use a proxy and you can be from anywhere to throw off Rcade from who you really are.

Twinpac people would just create new handles to get a round a six month suspension.

Like you and your PWZ pals did.

It's precisely because of you and rex zeitgeist that we even have a damn moderation policy. So shut the fuck up, jackass.

#126 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-19 02:51 AM

I love how you point the finger at me but fail to realize all the wrongs you have committed. Don't think your vitriol is not the true cause of us being moderated. Had you treated Rex with a little more respect he would have never flown off the handle. I guess you don't ever think of it that way.

Had you treated Rex with a little more respect he would have never flown off the handle.

You earn respect. Rex was as classy in his SECOND farewell as he was in every conversation on this blog. ie Not at all.

I love how you point the finger at me but fail to realize all the wrongs you have committed

Nice strawman. I've been deleted and banned before.

Difference is, i didn't make a new name to get around the suspension. You and rex did so every single time Rcade kicked you.

I never turned every thread into a "Political War zone" either. There were days on this blog that no threads escaped the little troll war of you two idiots.

Even though Rex and I aren't really friends because I support Obama I have to admit he is baited into dumps more than any other poster here.

Tell me when I posted someones personal information, like an address or phone number or email, jackass. You and rex both did that to people.

So comparing me to either of you is insulting and disingenuous.

There were days on this blog that no threads escaped the little troll war of you two idiots.

#131 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-10-19 02:58 AM

We drove this blog to new heights. Watch what happens when we overmoderate this place. Post counts will drop and this place will lose it's zeal. The people who post here like the combative nature it offers.

Alex you have threatened fellow bloggers. Isn't that just as bad? You wanted to meet Horace in real life.

He emailed me threats, jackass. But yeah, it was wrong.

You can't even control yourself when people leave you alone. LM didn't do anything to you at all.

ALEX is exactly right.

Jackass has been "projecting" throughout this thread.

And don't we all know it!

LOL

We drove this blog to new heights. Watch what happens when we overmoderate this place. Post counts will drop and this place will lose it's zeal. The people who post here like the combative nature it offers.

#134 | Posted by jackass at 2009-10-19 03:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

Ah, so we're back to the idea that shooting people until a bulletproof vest is invented, means y'all get credit for the vest.

Blow it out your ear. You've been nothing but a DESTRUCTIVE force on the retort. The only example of anything CONSTRUCTIVE you people ever did was your own website: "political war zone"

We all know how that ended, don't we?

That isn't actually true. Larry and I swapped insults. I remember rex called him a cannibal or something like that and Larry said that it was a lie and we had better find proof or retract the statement. I went looking for proof. I found what I found and went from there.

The flags are these to make Rcade's job of playground monitor easier. We take the load off him by moderating each other, so to speak.

Twinpac
You are absolutely right,and like you said some are overly sensitive or warriors

OH! you "swapped insults". Gosh, that's a good reason to stalk someone and release their personal info.

Then when you get tossed for it, shit...I bet even RCADE doesn't know how many accounts of yours he deleted until giving up and letting you back.

I figure Rex will do the same thing for about 3-6 months until Rogers gets tired of tracking him down, too. You know, like rex did last time.

It must be nice to never have to follow any rules wherever you go, jackass. At least niceville had the common decency to go somewhere else after rcade deleted a few dozon of his accounts.

Congrats. You are less decent than Niceville.

Twin instead of hiding behind flags, list the most egregious violators of the mod policy. You won't though because I imagine you chuckle at the thought of banishing someone for being slightly rude to you.

Ah com'mon JACKASS

Be honest.

Tell us again about that dossier you said you're keeping on DR posters.

You seemed to be so proud of it.

'Fess up.

list the most egregious violators of the mod policy

He doesn't have to. Read the deleted comments section and count the number of dumps to each name.

Count with your fingers if need be.

Twinpac I store posts sometimes to catch people in lies or contradicting themselves. Hans did the same thing.

Alex I wanted to know the people Twin enjoys flagging.

JACKASS

You don't have the power to put me in a defensive position. Life's a bitch, ain't it!

Btw Alex this is off topic but does Thomas Cooley have a good reputation in the legal arena?

Honestly?

The person I find to be most egregious on this website, given their whole posting history, is YOU jackass.

But I don't recall flagging you, since flags didn't exist back when you needed one. The fact that you're allowed here is a testament to Rogers' good nature.

Twinpac your silence speaks volumes to me. You claim to be a great businesswoman but your inability to stand up for yourself is probably a great hindrance to that.

JACKASS

Don't stop there.

Tell us who "Twin" enjoys flagging.

LOL

Twinpac I store posts sometimes to catch people in lies or contradicting themselves. Hans did the same thing.

#145 | Posted by jackass at 2009-10-19 03:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

Hans hasn't outed the personal info of two people on two separate blogs belonging to cadenhead, either. Nor does he brag about his "dossier", or tell people that the greatest pleasure in his life is hurting others.

You're an internet based lawsuit waiting to happen.

Alex that is a lie. Jak and Diablo are far more intolerable than I have ever been. Jak isn't able to last 3 days before being banned.

Tell us who "Twin" enjoys flagging.

LOL

#151 | Posted by Twinpac

That is for you to tell. I have no idea who crawls under your skin. All I can do is catch you in lies and report them to this blog.

Alex what is your answer on Thomas Cooley law school?

jak didn't give out personal info. Maybe he made references to betel's wife, but that aint the same thing. He didn't post her phone number, or link to her personal stuff on another blog.

I can't stand Jak's ideology or his frat boy juvenility, but he isn't a back stabbing internet stalker bitch. He also doesn't make plans to meet people and then stand them up, either.

Jak is a man. You're a boy.

I think there should be a weekly "Colosseum" thread in which anything goes, EXCEPT posting addresses, phone #s, etc.

It'll give the eager parties a forum in which they can lop off heads, and everyone looking for a civil discussion can just GTFO.

JACKASS

"Twinpac your silence speaks volumes to me. You claim to be a great businesswoman but your inability to stand up for yourself is probably a great hindrance to that.

Now that's just downright untrue. I've given you more information for your dossier than anybody here.

Remember the Greenbrier? It's not my fault you couldn't afford it.

You could have filled at least two spiral notebooks, lunkhead.

I looked on the greenbrier website Twin no events were listed. I could have slept in my van if I really thought you were going to meet me there.

JACKASS

Private meetings in private meeting rooms is not an "event."

An "event" is open to the public. The Greenbrier never does that.

I can tell you're not accustomed to classy digs like the Greenbrier.

Sleep in your van!

Oh My Good Lord! Please spare me the indignity!

Zarathustra- Dead hookers eat candy?

My van is like this one actually.

Except mine is maroon with different wheels but it is a 79 dodge.

Twin you brag about your money too much. People with real money I have met rarely brag about.

Can we have an 'anything goes' thread?

Do people really want that back?
#3 | Posted by rcade

I don't know if the poster who posed that question was around here the last time the anything-goes idea was floated and tried.

The result was short-lived and almost unbelievably boring. A bunch of adolescent trolls crying out for attention. You want that? Then help Rex Zeitgeist on his next attempt to set up his own inconsequential (and doomed) entry into the blogosphere. The DR doesn't have to exude the ambience of the Russian Tea Room, but it should be (and is) better than a mud wrestling pit for Lucha Libre wannabes.

"Dead hookers eat candy?"

That's a strange way to refer to Jackass' plans for the remainder of this AM.

Doc don't enter the thread if you don't want to read it.

JACKASS

To the best of my knowledge I've never even mentioned my net worth. I said I'm self-employed and successful at what I do for a living.

You did the translation . . . not me.

Do I detect a little green-eyed monster?

BTW, WHERE'S THAT LIST?

I hate being kept waiting!

What list? Why should I be jealous of you? If you are wealthy so be it. I make ends meet for myself. If I wanted to go to the greenbrier on vacation I could afford it. It isn't like I make 10.91 as you claim I do. To be honest nobody on here knows diddly squat about me and I like it that way.

As far as I know you could run a kiosk at the mall bringing in 35K a year in profits.

Okay - my 2 cents for what it's worth --

I think three weeks is too long -- two weeks is a long enough time to be banned.

As far as posters getting their feelings hurt over religion, etc. -- well, too bad. I'm Catholic and have been bashed by the atheists on here and although I find it personally offensive when they trash God and ridicule Him I've never once flagged them for it. But I also don't run around on DR always quoting verses from the Bible either so it works both ways.

FLAGGING FANATICS -- There are some on here who ought to be thrown off DR for all their wussy flagging. They'll flag at the slightest whim or perceived insult. To me, if you don't like something someone has said either to you -- or to another poster -- then get some guts and call that person out on it then and there on the thread. This flagging away behind someone's back is cowardly.

HANDS OFF A POSTER'S FAMILY MEMBERS -- I also think it should be hands off anyone's personal family members -- whether it was Goatman's deceased wife, or AU's deceased Mom and sister. Or a reference to someone's 5 year old kid -- I saw that happen too. Bringing in someone's family member to use against them in any way crosses way over the line. No dragging in someone's wife/kids with remarks intentionally personal.

GANGING UP ON ONE POSTER -- I had it done to me (back when everyone thought I was "a guy" on here lol) and I've seen it done a few times to other guys where 4 or 5 posters will come on and relentlessly bash one poster. I'm not talking about a majority of posters just not agreeing with one poster on a single thread but a concerted effort to ridicule someone every time he comes on DR to post.

And it goes without saying -- no singling out posters in a headline unless it's to call attention to something nice the guy's done. But it shouldn't be done simply to ridicule another poster.

WHERE ARE SOME OF OUR REGULARS?

Also, last but not least, is it just me or have a number of our regular posters just quit coming around anymore? Where's SanAntonioRogue and Doc Sarvis and JeffnDenmark and some of our other regulars? I'd like to see Soheifox and a few of the others back on here too. And how about "one more chance" at clemency for LetUsPrey and Rex?

IN CONCLUSION -

I like all you clowns. : )

And I feel everyone on here, no matter how different each one may be, adds to this place a certain aspect of their own personality which helps make DR the unique and special place it's always been.

Just leave it be.

Good night, all.

Doc don't enter the thread if you don't want to read it.
#168 | Posted by jackass

Jackass, don't presume to tell me what to do or not do on a blog.

Doc you said you opposed the idea of a relaxed rules thread. Some of us want that option. Just like some enjoy Rush Limbaugh. I don't so I don't listen. I don't try to get him off the air. If you can't handle people being rude don't ruin it for everybody just don't read the thread. You can stay in the kiddie end of the pool.

"Some of us want that option."

There's got to be a blog out there devoted to the infantile behavior you relish. Why don't you go out and find it? Or, better yet, create your own? Cadenhead's under no obligation to cater to your childish whims.

"Some of us want that option."

There's got to be a blog out there devoted to the infantile behavior you relish. Why don't you go out and find it? Or, better yet, create your own? Cadenhead's under no obligation to cater to your childish whims.

Doc childish would be starting an argument waiting for a retaliatory comment and flagging away. That is the equivalent of a little kid poking their older brother until the older brother gets mad and strikes back. The younger brother then goes crying to mommy and daddy. That is what gets done here by some of the weaker bloggers here. A few of us want a place where crybabies aren't allowed.

Then gather together some of your little friends, find an abandoned treehouse, and play "fort." I fail to see where Rogers is obliged to provide you with a venue for your your club meetings.

I think three weeks is too long -- two weeks is a long enough time to be banned.

On the other thread I had suggested 2 months to RCADE.

Still, I am happy he increased it to 3 weeks from 2.

call that person out on it then and there on the thread. This flagging away behind someone's back is cowardly.

If that remark was written with me on your mind, then:

1. I have had no problem "calling people out" on what they said.

But then it gets kicked into "he said", "no, you lie", "idiot", "moron".... and then it goes from there to copy-pasting of miles and miles of webpages trying to prove me wrong.

That stinks up the whole thread. NOBODY reads miles and miles of super-long posts.

So after it happened for the thousandth time, and after RCADE requested it in from of everyone that "I wish more people would resolve their differences by flagging instead of behaving like hooligans, I thought, hell yeah.

Why should I get a headache discussing religion (for example) with trashy people who just want me to post stuff from here and there and then go "you lie".

Just flag.

2. I never flag behind your back like a sneak. I will tell you I did it and why.

3. If we are in an argumentative mood, you know for a fact the I and Goatee are two of the only people here who are fully capable of taking a thread to over 300-400 posts.

You have seen me do it.

But it gets tiresome.

I hope I have made it clear for you at least. I only did this courtesy because you're a gal. LOL

Rogers has created a format where intense political debate can be waged. In order for me to fulfill his vision of destruction of the RNC I need the ability to operate outside the law. I believe some of the top political leaders check this blog for ammunition they can use in their own debates. If I am too constrained I am unable to properly assist the members of the DNC.

I believe some of the top political leaders check this blog

I felt something similar too.

I don't know about your politicians... they're all too stupid to check out "the internet which is nothing but a bunch of tubes"... but I am sure some small fry at the Pentagon likes taking a look.

Just like the BBC was caught on camera going through my other favorite forum (Pak Defense forum).

It's a free kind of intel gathering.. just sniffing the air trying to figure out "the word on the street".

Oh... and on the other thread, RCADE said the only reason he won't deputize me is because he thinks I talk about it too much later.

So to prove to him I can keep my mouth shut as a Deputy, from today, you will never find out if I flagged anyone or not. LOL

Happy?

I wanna be a Deputy. I wanna wear a shiny star with pointy bits.

Tosser, Rcade has his faves. Null, Alex or Corky would be the most likely candidates.

Tosser, Rcade has his faves. Null, Alex or Corky would be the most likely candidates.

Life is all about hope.

Anyway, people should also realize by now, that when some people request "you should call them out", it is really a trap to get you to fight so THEY can flag you for abuse.

It's called "baiting" and I have been a victim of that often enough to realize what the primary American fighting style is.

So as Bruce Lee said "fight without fighting". No worries.

#172 | POSTED BY CALIFCHRIS AT 2009-10-19 04:21 AM | REPLY | FLAG: TL;DR

I believe some of the top political leaders check this blog

LOL.

"So Vermin's the first victim of the blog-god's draconian new policy."

I like this new policy, should be even stiffer.

If you can't remain within the rules, bye bye!

There are some threads that is nothing but trolling crap, destroying a subject that could have been informative and interesting.

The old days this site was far more intelligent and with more rounded incites while the trolling was common to the thread.

Bunch of screamin retards now.

I guess I'll start flagging people, something I previously thought was usually too girly-man. I've flagged only one poster so far at this website. I should have flagged tosspot for calling Christians traitors and laughing at their imprisonment in Nazi China, but had mercy on the little boy.
I'll begin by flaggin rcade next time he puts up a feel good article. Is there a glucose level exceeded flag?

I should have flagged tosspot for calling Christians traitors and laughing at their imprisonment in Nazi China

Wouldn't have worked even if you had. I was well within the posting rules.

And I would advise you to stop getting obsessed with me. This is like the third time you mentioned me for no reason.

but had mercy on the little boy.

Well, coward, don't "have mercy on me". LOL

You are nothing but a bore. All Fundamentalists are.

Do understand, I called Christians in Asia a good cover for the CIA hiding traitors amongst them. And that they should be all kept an eye on for that reason.

Christianity should not be part of Asia as Buddhism or Islam is. And it should be discouraged as much as possible.

I can't help it if that made your blood boil. LOL

Dude, if you're going to increase the time out, just make it something like 3 months. Then, the troll in question will likely forget about the retort and never come back anyway. If they really want to continue here, they can just contact you via email and hash it out there.

Notice:

1. I never insult Jesus. No Muslim does, since Jesus is a Muslim not a "Christian".

2. I do point out the hypocrisy in the words of the Fundamentalists.

Do check. This is all within the rules.

Another "tolerant" moslem who insists we accomodate his rights while wanting others to have less.

just make it something like 3 months.

I said that first. LOL

Well, actually I said 2 months....

But good to see someone else agrees.

It is time the hooliganism stops. People think they are being funny... no, they are actually ending up making themselves look like apes.

Tosser - please direct me to that family tree.

who insists we accomodate his rights

And HOW am I stepping on your rights?

Am I locking you in your room and stopping you from going to your Church? LOL

while wanting others to have less.

How come I never have a problem with the atheists and agnostics on this site???

That's because I am not the one with the problem.

#180 | Posted by jackass at 2009-10-19 05:27 AM | Reply | Flag:delusions of grandeur flag! That's why I'm giving it an FF!

Now watch them crawl out protesting....

1, 2, 3.....

Rogers should be able to do whatever he wants.

But the stat that 95% of people here don't get dumps is meaningless. It certainly doesn't mean that only 5% of the people here post "trashy" comments.

Whether you get a dump depends on who your comment was directed to. Is the person a crybaby who is going to flag? And as important WHO flagged you plays into it. I've gotten away with saying things that are much worse than comments that were dumped. Why? Because in those cases Rogers probably thought the whiner who flagged me was being a much bigger (rightwing) asshole than I was. Also, that Rogers feels that certain nationalities and religions need to be protected more than others is basically undeniable at this point.

The complete subjectiveness of the moderation policy is why it isn't effective. Adding a week to the supsensions won't fix it.

Actually Klifferd does a much better job when it comes to religious topics.

I do the military kind of stuff.

YS can predict the future.

All Pakistanis here have their specialties. LOL

But we can temporarily change roles.

The complete subjectiveness of the moderation policy is why it isn't effective.

Spoken like the guy who got the short end of the stick. LOL

The complete subjectiveness of the moderation policy is why it isn't effective.

Spoken like the guy who got the short end of the stick. LOL

#205 | Posted by Tosser at 2009-10-19 09:18 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: Will troll and then cry to Rcade if I respond

Will troll and then cry to Rcade if I respond

I promised to show RCADE that I am worthy of the Deputy position whenever it opens up.

Which means, nobody will know if I was the one who flagged. LOL

But why not take a chance?

She is the definition of a hypocrite.
#28 | Posted by jackass at 2009-10-18 08:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

If anyone knows the meaning of hypocrite while also needing to grow a little skin, it's you. Spare us your righteous indignation.

Maybe you'll do the world a favor and use your chest to catch some lead while trying to use your mad awesome ninja skills to steal some rotten cabbage.

#69 | Posted by Axiom

Death threats Axiom?? I flagged that for you.

#111 | Posted by jackass at 2009-10-06 07:38 AM | Reply | Flag:

"2. I never flag behind your back like a sneak. I will tell you I did it and why."

"Which means, nobody will know if I was the one who flagged. LOL"

Both posted by the same assclown.

Both posted by the same assclown.

Yes, Dullard. Didn't you get the post in the middle where I mentioned why I was changing my policy?

I wanna be a Deputy! That's why!

"I wanna be a Deputy! That's why!"

Alot of serial killers are cop wannabes.

Because everyone is getting paranoid about my flagging, I think it is perhaps better if you don't see it coming or if I don't own up to it.

Unlike before.

I am now going to play it American-style.

Alot of serial killers are cop wannabes.

Do I sound like a serial killer?

Serial narcissist, more like.

Serial narcissist

Surely you jest.

Such people are without emotions... so much so, they can cheat a lie detector anytime.

I think I have some emotions... somewhere....

Because everyone is getting paranoid about my flagging, I think it is perhaps better if you don't see it coming or if I don't own up to it.

Unlike before.

I am now going to play it American-style.

#212 | Posted by Tosser

The only policy change needed on this site is for Rcade to give you the boot, you childish whimp.

No one thinks more highly of you here than... you.

to give you the boot, you childish whimp.

Sully
Corky
Wisgod (learn to spell, mate)

All 3 who have been consistently bested by yours truly. (there be more coming, not to worry)

Explains the bitterness and the angry angry words. LOL

I don't even know what these people want from me anymore.

Does anyone know what they want? LOL

No one thinks more highly of you here than... you.

I wasn't aware this was a competition?

Is everything in America a competition? No wonder you people are so divorce crazy. LOL

Wisgod obviously doesn't like me play it American-style.

But me likes!

"All 3 who have been consistently bested by yours truly(sic). (there be more coming, not to worry)"

LOL. Delusions of grandeur.

Axiom I only flagged you after you flagged me and gave me a dump. At least I owned up to what I did.

LOL Delusions of grandeur.

LOL. Senility.

The complete subjectiveness of the moderation policy is why it isn't effective.

#203 | Posted by Sully at 2009-10-19 09:14 AM

There should be a sub-rule whereby all of tosser's flags are put up for the rest of us to vote on whether they are dump-worthy or not. It seems he may be the problem...sorry, tosser.

Axiom I only flagged you after you flagged me and gave me a dump. At least I owned up to what I did.

I don't think I've ever flagged anyone that would cause them to get a dump. I've given funny flags.

At least you're admitting that you're a sissy.

The complete subjectiveness of the moderation policy is why it isn't effective. Adding a week to the supsensions won't fix it.

#203 | Posted by Sully at 2009-10-19 09:14 AM | Reply |

Bingo. Just look at the posts that were dumped and deleted.
All of a sudden, "faggot" isn't dumpable? Is it a coincidence that the people that typed it are left of center?

I still have no idea how it's allowable to attack christians day after day, but simply mentioning the fact that mohammed was a pedo that married a 9 y/o gets dumped.
Anyone can pick on rednecks, make stereotypes about lefties or righties, etc, but dare stereotype a filthy muslim and it's a dump.

The complete absurdity and unpredictable nature of the moderation policy is the reason it doesn't work.

Explain how vernon's comment gets deleted, but the comment he responded to didn't? Don't give me some bullshit about how nobody flagged "legio", because you obviously read the fucking comment when you were deleting Vern's retort.
You aren't obligated to delete or dump something simply because it was flagged, retard.

In a mad maxx world these right wing denier faggots will be toast..ignorant,spineless, chickenshits.

#21 | Posted by Legio at 2009-10-16 09:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

you forgot to say 'cocksucker'

Or, were you saving that for Shawn?

Posted by vernon at 2009-10-16 10:29 PM

-The complete absurdity and unpredictable nature of the moderation policy is the reason it doesn't work.

I'd say your posts have been the major beneficiary of that unpredictability, such as it might be, with a tip of the hat to your humor.

"The complete absurdity and unpredictable nature of the moderation policy is the reason it doesn't work."

Its predictable. Just not logical. Just like Free Republic. In fact, that is way this site is going with the longer suspensions and subjective standards.

Post #189 has 2 FF's (because it was funny), but I've been dumped for just as benign of a comment because "Families are off limits".

Why are some families off limits and others aren't? Selectively enforced...

#228 ff. Now let's see how long it is until some totally pathetic wuss hits the flag "offensive".

There should be a sub-rule whereby all of tosser's flags are put up for the rest of us to vote on whether they are dump-worthy or not.

Ha! So you can see if I flagged or not? Now that I have changed my policy to go silent?

Nice try.

Anyway, like I said, I never had a problem here with any god-less types. They and me be buddies.

It's always the Christian Fundo types who are trouble.

Sure, Moder8. We all know how fucking tolerable you've been. How many threads have you posted about how mean the Right is?

I'd say your posts have been the major beneficiary of that unpredictability, such as it might be, with a tip of the hat to your humor.

#230 | Posted by Corky at 2009-10-19 10:42 AM | Reply

No doubt I've gotten away with quite a bit, considering I'm not left of center.
If I was, then I'd never have to worry about being dumped.

I have no problem with Rogers dumping the second and 3rd handles that are here simply to post the most absurd shit in the shortest amount of time prior to their vacation.
What Vern did deserved to be dumped and he deserves to be suspended. I think when somebody flies off the handle like that they should get whacked harder than normal. I dont think 3 dumps over a 10 day period deserves the same fate as the guy/gal that goes hogwild.

Dang! This feels good. I've already found two offensive posts to flag today. I can be the next princess-and-the-pea like tosspot.

Moder8 flagged me for using an Urdu name. LOL

I can be the next princess-and-the-pea like tosspot.

You bitch too much and too incoherently for RCade to entertain your delusions of... well, whatever they happen to be that day.

Dang! This feels good.

Yes... it does, doesn't it?

Swallowed your pride, have you? LOL.

I can be the next princess-and-the-pea like tosspot.

Your flags have to "stick".

RCADE doesn't agree with every flag.

I don't think I've ever flagged anyone that would cause them to get a dump. I've given funny flags.

At least you're admitting that you're a sissy.

#227 | Posted by Axiom

I apologize if it wasn't you who flagged me

You bitch too much and too incoherently for RCade

First he complains I am being unkind to his Christian brethren... then he cried about how I was taking his rights away and stopping him from going to his Church.... and then comes other stuff...

All the Christian Fundos I see here.. from 101 to Diablo to Wisgod and Corky and whoever.... they cry too much and they like to imagine being persecuted. LOL

-I dont think 3 dumps over a 10 day period deserves the same fate as the guy/gal that goes hogwild.

Rogers is messing with your schedule, lmao.

You could be right. But that makes 'splainin' the rules more difficult.

I think it's funny that some people on the thread think that Rogers is making enough money here to hire people to moderate for him.

There's nothing wrong with flagging comments, especially if we like a free blog.

I'll flag you if it makes you happy, Jackass. Just post that Mohommed married and had sex with a 9 year-old and I'll claim to be offended by it. Let's even be nice to tossup and say it was a 16 year-old. I'll claim to be offended anyway.

I'm a Christian Fundo? How do you say waterhead in Paki?

Tosser like to imagine that he exists.

101 a Christian Fundie... or me?

They don't teach reading comprehension in Paki, do they.

Rogers is making enough money here to hire people to moderate for him.

In case Rodgers is wondering, my offer to be Deputized includes doing it all for free!

Yeah!

There's nothing wrong with flagging comments

Well done, Junior!

Now you are getting to see the world from MY eyes. LOL

I'm a Christian Fundo?

You have SOME problem afflicting you. And that must be it.

101 a Christian Fundie... or me?

Oh, 101 is, for sure. AU exposed him.

As for you... there are many Fundies who never admit they are Fundo. It's not fashionable in America, I understand.

There's nothing wrong with flagging comments, especially if we like a free blog.

the problem is with ourselves. Excessive flagging of posts that are done out of personal agendas are the problem...not the moderation rules.

The flagging needs to be "transparent". It still means that deserving posts get dumped because you shouldn't have to defend a truly "deserving" flag.

People who flag posts like a pussy deserve no protection.

This may be RCADE's place and his rules but the problem with the application of the moderation policy belongs to US.

IMHO

Tosser like to imagine that he exists.

You are right... I am not here.... it's all a bad dream... mommy will kiss you and make the pain go away... it's all in your head anyway...

I was never here....

Now when I snap my fingers, you will open your eyes but never see me.

SNAP

First he complains I am being unkind to his Christian brethren...

Maybe you didn't get the message. Highlighting the hypocrisy of a conservative religious idiot is considered extremely unkind in America, as long as that idiot's religion is Christianity. I'll cut you some slack this time, since it was probably one of those cultural nuances of America that you wouldn't pick up on in Pakistan.

then he cried about how I was taking his rights away and stopping him from going to his Church

Diablo and the fundie crowd thinks that it is both their right and their obligation to act toward non-Christians with hostility and self-righteousness. Part of worshiping their god is lashing out at others' beliefs (or lack thereof). Another part is the denial and suppression of any information that is critical of the faith. This all usually gets classified as "defending the faith," and it is a "right" frequently claimed by bigots and Christian supremacists.

Pretty funny coming from a Fundie Chinese sycophant.

Makes one wonder if zombie has ever been able to distinguish fundamentalist views from mine. All it would take is maybe 10 minutes of reading on fundamentalism at wiki. Sad.

BTW, Vermin's crack on me wasn't flagged by me.

No thin skin here.

Makes one wonder if zombie has ever been able to distinguish fundamentalist views from mine.

That would be about as useful to me as distinguishing between two turds by their nut content.

Why would I care? Both smell like shit and are bound for the same sewer pipe.

Rcade needs to rethink the flagging policy. It seems that some are abusing it.

This may be RCADE's place and his rules but the problem with the application of the moderation policy belongs to US.

IMHO

#249 | Posted by eberly

Agreed. The current method is too open for abuse.

BTW, Vermin's crack on me wasn't flagged by me.

Meh, Vermin's gone now, and no one is shedding any tears.Though has anyone ever noticed that the DR gets far less interesting when there aren't any loons visiting?

Part of the appeal of this place is it's ordinarily overflowing with rambling moonbats. Fresh meat for the grinder. Take away the meat, and the grinder gets bored.

This may be RCADE's place and his rules but the problem with the application of the moderation policy belongs to US.

That's because some people flag everything, and some don't.

#258 | Posted by ZombieHunter - don't know whether to thank or smack you!

-Vermin's gone now

At least Rex has someone to play with.

Maybe distinguishing among trolling, flaming and spamming would be a help. Left wing true believers think any disagreement of opinion is somehow reprehensible and should be flagged.
I, for one, plan to flag all comments I deem offensive or abusive from now on.

"They don't teach reading comprehension in Paki, do they."

Nobody is sure. The dropout rate is so high over there that they can't find someone who finished school to ask.

That's because some people flag everything, and some don't.

exactly. And I see no reason for the anonymous protection of flaggers.

I would have no problem with my flags being revealed to everyone.

RCADE should conduct some sort of poll or have a vote to see if transparent flags should be a part of this site.

It doesn't take anybody's right away to flag and it wouldn't force a change in the moderation policy.

But it would wash out the pansies here who flag everything.

And they are free to continue doing it...for all of us to see.

"exactly. And I see no reason for the anonymous protection of flaggers.

I would have no problem with my flags being revealed to everyone."

My rule would be that if you flag someone during an exchange during which you yourself were offensive, you get 2 dumps. Obviously, the intent of the flag system is to protect crybabies but there is no real reason to protect hypocritical cyrbabies.

I guess I'll start flagging people, something I previously thought was usually too girly-man.

#192 | Posted by Diablo at 2009-10-19 08:54 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag Fag

That filthy thing from Crapistan thinks I'm a Christian fundo...

Maybe it's all that dust, or poor nutrition, or stink, or dung, or lack of schooling, but how can anyone be that fucking stupid?

-how can anyone be that fucking stupid?

It's hard werk.

Easy, 101. I figure tosser is either an Indian trying to get us to hate pakistanis or an Israeli trying to get us to hate all mosloids. No one can be that way in real life.

"I don't even know what these people want from me anymore.

#219 | Posted by Tosser"

They want you to shut your fucking mouth, make their falafels with the extra tahini sauce, and then ride your fucking bike to the next corner. Is that really too much to ask, cave dweller?

"All of a sudden, "faggot" isn't dumpable? Is it a coincidence that the people that typed it are left of center?

#228 | Posted by 101chairborne"

Shut up, fag. (You see, the key is to drop the "-got.")

If faggot is dumpable, how should I address JerryTarkanian in the future?

Anyone who feels Rcade's application of the rules is unfair should be really happy that I'm not put in charge. Boy, would "moderation" take on a whole new meaning if moder8 were running this show.

Anyone who feels Rcade's application of the rules is unfair should be really happy that I'm not put in charge.

I'm pretty sure RCADE is happy you aren't in charge either.

He IS trying to make some money off this correct?

If faggot is dumpable, how should I address JerryTarkanian in the future?

#272 | Posted by wisgod at 2009-10-19 02:31 PM

(see #271)

11,000 Obscene Phone Calls in Delhi

The domain name would be on EBay 10 minutes after you were put in charge.

make their falafels with the extra tahini sauce

Falafel? Tahini?

What the hell are those?

Are you calling me an Arab you ignoramus?

cave dweller?

Like the last cave-dweller who did 9-11 on you?

Hell, I'm not that good. LOL

"Fag"

(see #271)

#275 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

That's already taken by BigLeagueChew.

I figure tosser is either an Indian trying to get us to hate pakistanis or an Israeli trying to get us to hate all mosloids.

My goodness you Fundo types have an imagination! LOL

Since I've been on DR, I have been called British, Australian, American, and now Indian and Israeli.

Wow.

#279 | Posted by wisgod at 2009-10-19 02:57 PM

The might get around the moderation policy, and has an additional feminine implication.

or poor nutrition

You are right... when it comes to blowing our asses eating candy, we don't even come close to this:

My rule would be

Nobody cares about your rules. Simple.

dropout rate is so high over there

Hmmmmm.... India and Pakistan are "developing" countries.

USA is a "developed" country. What is YOUR excuse?

University of Minnesota sociologists have found that the U.S. high school dropout rate is considerably higher than most people think -- with one in four students not graduating -- and has not improved appreciably in recent decades.

25%. Wow.

That filthy thing from Crapistan thinks I'm a Christian fundo...

You are one.

If it quacks like a duck.....

You also have multiple usernames here. Typical.

Anyway... who the hell did I just hypnotize into not seeing me?

Well, whoever it was, it goes for all of you now as well.

I am invisible.... I was never here... you are getting sleepy goddammit..... everything is only a bad dream....

RCADE... when you open your eyes, you will feel great need to Deputize someone and his name will start with "T" and end with "R".

SNAP

I guess I'll start flagging people, something I previously thought was usually too girly-man. I've flagged only one poster so far at this website. I should have flagged tosspot for calling Christians traitors and laughing at their imprisonment in Nazi China, but had mercy on the little boy. I'll begin by flaggin rcade next time he puts up a feel good article. Is there a glucose level exceeded flag?
#192 | Posted by Diablo | Flag: Glucose Level Exceeded

It must be the time they fire up the lone dung fueled generator in that crapistani village you live in.
Is that why you post consecutively, or is it because you're too fucking stupid to get your thoughts out in one post?

101 is trying too hard.

I don't think you have noticed but you burnt out long ago.

I have explained, it is what I do. If you don't like it, tough. LOL

s that why you post consecutively

All you need to know is, it's something you can't do.

Since AU dragged you all over the DR by your hair, you have not been able to make a post longer than a couple of sentences. LOL

Burn out.

I am a prolific writer, see? I like to communicate, see?

I am away from the net and when I come back a few minutes or hours later, I feel compelled to answer everyone who wrote me. LOL

And when I get an after-thought, I make another post. And I do it fast. Breaking up my thoughts into multiple posts also makes it easier for the readers.

I am not like you who would think for a day and come up with 2 sentences worth and even then end up sounding like a bitter loser. LOL

Posting is like a flowing river.

You post like you are constipated.

AmericanUnity? The guy who posted the Lake Michigan Iceberg photos? No wonder you idiots have to import WMD's from Iran.

Here's a brief summary of the Kerry Lugar Bill (it could be missing stuff, or articles such as secret protocols may be obfuscated); but the uses seem worthwhile, whilst the conditions seem negotiable and unenforceable:

Corr.:

The Last two sentences are supposed to read:

Now somebody said that MOST or ALL the money will be hovered up by the Pakistani elite (Political, Military and Bureucratic). How true do all of you think its is?

A percentage would help.

No wonder you idiots have to import WMD's from Iran.

Iran doesn't have any WMDs and the whole world knows it.

So you still have a thing for Bush/Cheney, huh? LOL

Quote:

"Calls for Halt to Assistance if Pakistan Found not to be working towards US strategic goals"

Folks; US strategic goals are de-Nuclearising Muslim Majority Pakistan; and in an optimum world; removing Balochistan province from Pakistan.

Watch out for tons of screaming and backstabbing from both Pakistan and the US.

How true do all of you think its is?

Look... 9 out of 10 dollars go to American go-betweens.

It's all a scam.

Even Zardari can't take as much away as the Americans will steal from the American Govt.

Have you already forgotten the Haliburton thingy?

No wonder you idiots have to import WMD's from Iran.

Me thinks someone is ignorant. Iran is five to ten years away from nuclear weappons.

The Drudge ReTort has already established this.

Watch out for tons of screaming and backstabbing from both Pakistan and the US.

No such thing.

I think things have matured around this topic for it to be settled behind closed doors.

I said a few days ago that America has a rude surprise headed it's way... I think they also half expect it.

But no, there will not be too much drama in public.

That's my feeling at least.

Me thinks someone is ignorant.

He's an American... LOL

And a right-winger.

And a Fundo.

No hope for rescue... total loss... hahahahahahahahahahah
a

American go-betweens

By that you mean American-born, generally white, US citizens?

I know about Halliburton but those were in Iraq and Afghanistan. They didn't have to contend with a mass of angry Pakistanis looking for any excuse to string American thieves up by their balls.

A functioning government had already been destroyed before the American corporate thieves had already gotten there.

not be too much drama in public

Then the back-stabbing will take place behind closed doors and we won't hear about it till it might be too late.

Me thinks someone is ignorant. Iran is five to ten years away from nuclear weappons.

Posted by YS_1

Me thinks WMD and Nuclear weapons are 2 different things.
And me also thinks they'll never have a nuclear weappon.
And finally, me thinks you're an idiot.
Questions?

By that you mean American-born, generally white, US citizens?

Yes.

I know about Halliburton but those were in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It's the same kind of scam.

I'll bet most of the billions will end up in Biden's pocket after circling the world. LOL

Whether Americans like to admit it or not... their "Dems" are an extremely corrupt party.

Me thinks WMD and Nuclear weapons are 2 different things.

Me thinks you need to get your brain examined for worms.

(how can anyone be THIS stupid???)

WMD:

noun

A weapon that kills or injures civilian as well as military personnel (nuclear and chemical and biological weapons)

Iran will never have nukes, they get far more out of threatening to have them than they would ever get with them.

All nukes are WNDs, but not all WMDs are nukes.

Hey, look over there! A dog roasting over a dung fire!

That ought to quiet this thread down until those two realize they've been had. By that time they'll stumble across a pile of rocks and some broad showing too much ankle, and that's when the party will get started.

WMD - Weapon of Mass Destruction

Nuclear, chemical or biological.

Idiot.

FF Chair

until those two realize they've been had.

Nope. He really is that stupid. LOL

And so are you.

Stop trying to protect him.

So, how long until there is a move for a "no trolling" rule?

WNDs,

Weapons of Nice Destruction?

So, how long until there is a move for a "no trolling" rule?

That is something impossible to put in place.

OK, I posted that wrong. I said WMD.
She said "Me thinks someone is ignorant. Iran is five to ten years away from nuclear weappons".

I didn't imply nuclear, she did. I was implying any type of WMD and agree Nuclear is one of them.

Hope that clears that little matter up, mutt.

NIce catch Corky.
Stupid We're Nutty Daily should be a WMD too.

Hope that clears that little matter up

It did.

You didn't know what a WMD was until I told you. LOL

You didn't know what a WMD was until I told you. LOL

#317 | Posted by Tosser

Sure. You people know more about that chicken shit way of fighting than I do.

So, how long until there is a move for a "no trolling" rule?

#312 | POSTED BY KANREI AT 2009-10-19 03:54 PM

That would leave 10 posters

There is not one person alive who doesn't know what WMD means. Maybe prior to George's Iraqi Debacle there may have been some. Not anymore.

Funny thing is... 101 didn't know either... LOL

Are Wisgod and 101 the dame guy? He did boast of having multiple names here.....

Nawwww..... Who cares anyway... they are both as stupid as each other. LOL

That would leave 10 posters

#319 | Posted by jackass

And half of them would be Boyd, et al.

Apparently wiz-dog has just learnt to be lyrical.

Congratulations on just reaching fourth grade.

You people know more about that chicken shit way of fighting than I do.

America has the most WMD in the world after Russia.

So you are calling WMD USA "chicken shit"???

hahahahahahahahaha... Oooo boy... someone was dropped on their head when they were a baby....

Tosser,
You are drifting into BoOB territory. He thinks I didn't know the word "secede" until he told me it wasn't succeed due to a typing error. As if there is a Southerner who doesn't know we did not succeed in seceding.

Who cares anyway... they are both as stupid as each other. LOL

#321 | Posted by Tosser

Yeah, we're the "dame" guy, Allah Einstein

Yeah, we're the "dame" guy, Allah Einstein

God only knows what THAT meant.... Then again maybe even God doesn't know what that blithering idiot spoke.

Are Wisgod and 101 the dame guy?

A pakistani with a hairlip?

I bet I couldn't understand anything if he was talking to me.

someone was dropped on their head when they were a baby....

For all we know that could be a ritual in your country.

A pakistani with a hairlip?

Oh... a spelling mistake.

Is that all?

For all we know that could be a ritual in your country.

A frontal lobe circumcision?

a ritual in your country

We know it's a ritual in yours.

For all we know that could be a ritual in your country.

No... it seems to be one in yours.

Americans don't drop their babies! We shake 'em or hit their heads on the ceiling.

LOL... YS and I said the same thing simultaneously.

Pete and repeat are quite an act.

frontal lobe circumcision

Lobotomies?

Didn't America carry out those till the 1950's.

Considering psychiatry's protean nature, its kind of a good thing it didn't enter in force into P-stan till the sixtites.

Would explain the upsurge in paranoia amongst Americans once we come to US citizens in their mid-50's.

Americans don't drop their babies!

No of course not. The floor hit him on the head. Bad floor.

Pete and repeat are quite an act

What one line.

Your brain incapable of more than six words

Didn't America carry out those till the 1950's.

Last one was sometime in 1986, believe it or not.

#339 Read the second sentence Tosser, it was setting up a joke.

Your brain incapable of more than six words

Their brains have been "hollywoodized" to think in sound bites only.

How do you guys know so much about American culture/history/politics?

why do you care?

what time is it in Pakistan?

it was setting up a joke.

Ah...

Their brains have been "hollywoodized" to think in sound bites only.

No, but American culture does believe in "getting to the point" and that does not take many words. We tend to believe that, if it take more than a few sentences to explain, you are making it up.

How do you guys know so much about American culture/history/politics?

Doesn't everyone?

why do you care?

We don't.

what time is it in Pakistan?

Pretty late.

An Ignore Button would cure a lot of these ills.

I would be happy narrowing the people I discuss things with to about 10 and be just fine with that.

But then you would miss my wit Many. =D

How do you guys know so much about American culture/history/politics?

1) Because its spread all over the world. Its nearly inescapable.

2) We like some parts of it.

3) Internet

4) How stupid are you to ask a question like that?

5) It's OK.

2 responses and neither of them can answer the question "what time is it in Pakistan"?

wonder why?

We tend to believe that, if it take more than a few sentences to explain, you are making it up.

That can lead to misunderstandings and heaps of trouble.

Somethings can't be explained in just a few words.

I can, YS can, but we can do it because we know at least 2, 3, languages. That makes communication extra efficient.

If you stick to English alone... and you insist on an explanation of a few words... you would end up sounding like a used car salesman.

You used the "used car salesman" wrong there. They are an example of someone who hides the truth in a barrage of words meant to confuse the listener.

Tosser, all 3 of your posts are bullshit.

no, not everybody is concerned.

"pretty late" isn't a time.

and you are lying. you DO care. I will go and see your posts and how much time you spend here "not caring"

why the chip?

wonder why?

"Yours is not to wonder why
Yours is but to do or die."

LOL

I think you can figure out the time zone for Karachi by yourself.

and you are lying. you DO care.

About what?

Would you clarify what the hell you are asking?

Oh, I wouldn't ignore you Kanrei. But anyone on my running list of saved comments would have to go. Then I wouldn't be able to save so much data.

2:27am Tuesday (PKT) - Time in Lahore, Pakistan

They are an example of someone who hides the truth in a barrage of words meant to confuse the listener.

But they also use key words in their speech to rope you in.

It's a subliminal marketing thing.

2:27am Tuesday (PKT)

See?

Even Jackass is smarter. LOL

I think you can figure out the time zone for Karachi by yourself.

I guess I can. then I can tell you what time it is because you don't know.

again, I wonder why you don't know. I know what time it is where I am.....4:30 PM

Would you clarify what the hell you are asking?

chip on your shoulder? not familiar with the expression? interesting....you seem to know everything there is to know about our culture (while being a pakistani)

Still light enough for a stoning or to dark to hit the woman

Ignorant pissdog shows up again.

Is this how long it took you to come up with some random stereotype?

Fucking Idiot.

And as for the other gentleman from a US timezone; I'm currently on a sojourn outside dear old Pk.

Seriously, were you surprised that we knew about US culture? Interesting.

4:30 PM

Kinda far from the East Coast.

Cool.

4:30 is only one time zone from the East Coast

because you don't know.

I know, of course, what time it is. Why wouldn't I know?

Just wanted to see if you could figure it out... and you couldn't.

chip on your shoulder? not familiar with the expression?

I know what it means. I don't know why you are applying it in my case.

Seriously, were you surprised that we knew about US culture?

Not surprised as there are lots of folks who are obsessed with our culture.

why are you 2 so indignant and rude?(while complaining about the manners of Americans)

I guess my question really is WTF is your problem and Tosser's?

"Pakistan
Islamic law in Pakistan still allows stoning as a form of punishment, and it is used as a punishment for adultery."

Nope. It was done away with in Mushi's time. Wiki is wrong, ignoramus.

I guess my question really is WTF is your problem and Tosser's?

Self-fulfilling prophesy. They had an idea of what Americans were like and came here expecting it. They attacked many when only being attacked by a few which created exactly what they thought they would find.

why are you 2 so indignant and rude?

Because you and your kind are rude?

I guess my question really is WTF is your problem and Tosser's?

You are the ones with the problem, my man.

You will be spoken in the same tone you use for others. It's the Asian way.

Nope. It was done away with in Mushi's time. Wiki is wrong, ignoramus.

#370 | Posted by Tosser

Not surprised as there are lots of folks who are obsessed with our culture.

It's not an obsession.

It's "we can't help but know stuff".

Believe me, we wish we didn't. Life was simple once.

That is not totally true Tosser and you are not innocent in how you are treated here. When you first came here and learned I was Jewish, you hated me. As time has gone on, we have accepted each other and can actually talk, but you did come here swinging.

Gotta go. Have fun digging trenches.

Tosser has the largest inferiority complex anyone will ever see. He is a tool. Obsession is too light of a term.

allows stoning as a form of punishment

You bastard. Your Fort Bragg filth Zia-ul-Haq took over the country.

YOU OWNED HIM.

You even have a hollywood production called Charlie Wilson's War showing your ownership over that bastard.

The country was only thirty years old when you green lighted the takeover of the country by that motherfucker. AND for your information; THAT has Never Been Carried Out By the Government.

The only place it has happened is when you pushed the Taliban into our country. We are n ow pushing them back towards your soldiers dick brain.

Not to mention the Saudis, your best buds. We who do not carry out stoning, are considered suspect by your government. But the Houston-in-Arabia plant that is Riyadh, is your best friend forever in the Middle East. Even your fucking President either bows before him, or he kisses him and holds hands (George Shrub). You propped up a guy who tried to use stoning, and you're propping up somebody who does stoning.

YOU OWN IT.

I guess this couple would call you a liar if they weren't dead.

Yes... it was in a taliban infested area (if it really happened... no way to tell).

when a couple was stoned to death after militants declared them guilty of adultery. The incident took place in Khwezai-Baezai, about 40 km west of Ghalanai, Mohmand Agency headquarters.

These people have since been killed/driven off. It had nothing to do with the legal system.

Ignoramus.... learn to read. I remember you posted this same shit a years ago too. LOL

Bwahahaha. He who lives in glass houses....

why are you 2 so indignant and rude?(while complaining about the manners of Americans)

Where to begin?

indignant

Do a google search for the word Paki on this website.

rude
If you're rude to somebody, they will not take it.

Plus if you come in with snide remarks, we'll repay in the same coin.

while complaining about the manners of Americans
Well then Americans don't have to be snide to us, do they?

Your Fort Bragg filth Zia-ul-Haq took over the country.

YOU OWNED HIM.

That's right. It was actually American filth, these stoning laws.

However they were never exercised by the State legal system and were abolished in Mushi's time.

Iraq never had and hadd laws... now they do.. just because of America. LOL

why are you 2 so indignant and rude?(while complaining about the manners of Americans)

Where to begin?

indignant

Do a google search for the word Paki on this website.

rude
If you're rude to somebody, they will not take it.

Plus if you come in with snide remarks, we'll repay in the same coin.

while complaining about the manners of Americans
Well then Americans don't have to be initially snide to us, do they?

"If faggot is dumpable, how should I address JerryTarkanian in the future?

#272 | Posted by wisgod"

Same as you always do: "Hey, you back there, slow down! I paid for a half an hour, and I want to enjoy every minute of it."

Tosser = Blogworld version of "Tokyo Rose".

He who lives in glass houses....

Well, duh!

Coming from a country with a rape every few seconds, you ought to know all about glass houses Mr.WMD. hahahahahahaha

Tosser has the largest inferiority complex anyone will ever see.

Why would I have an inferiority complex? I know what "WMD" means at least. LOL

Do a google search for the word Paki on this website

They're too stupid to realize what they are saying and don't mean anything by it.

But, yeah, it is stupid.

When you first came here and learned I was Jewish, you hated me.

You must have said something to set me off?

Tosser = Blogworld version of "Tokyo Rose".

Oh come on now!

I see that the discourse with you guys from pakistan isn't going to change. you must thrive on it. that is okay. there are plenty of folks here who thrive on it. all nationalities, religions, political leanings etc.. aside. we are equal opportunity offenders here but when folks come on here and insult all of us then what do you expect?

Plus if you come in with snide remarks, we'll repay in the same coin.

I can see that.

predicts the future

btw - Tosser, that was hilarious. Thnx, but lets not get carried away.

Why would I have an inferiority complex? I know what "WMD" means at least. LOL

#387 | Posted by Tosser

No doubt. And you also know which stone will fly true when thrown.

But before we start going on about so-called "traitors" there is one thing I have to mention; that I bleieve the Baloch are looking for their legitimate rights, whilst it is only the people in what was historically called Marri-Bugti Country who are angry with the state. That is because the state has not treated these districts right.

Same as you always do: "Hey, you back there, slow down! I paid for a half an hour, and I want to enjoy every minute of it."

#384 | Posted by mOntecOre

That wasn't very nice.

that the discourse with you guys from pakistan isn't going to change

First of all, thank you for your polite tone.

The reason you got a rough reception was because your first comment after I had been here was:

A pakistani with a hairlip?

I bet I couldn't understand anything if he was talking to me.

I believe the word snide would cover the nature of this remark.

So I/we responded in kind.

And you also know which stone will fly true when thrown.

When it's headed your way, I can't miss. LOL

Anyway - Balochistan and the Kerry-Lugar-Berman bill.

Thats what I'm interested in.

Coming from a country with a rape every few seconds

If there were 300M+ citizens in Pakistan, I expect the statistics would work out similarly. It seems that the batshit insane make up a similar percentage of the population in every country. The ways that the batshit insane make their presence known seems to differ.

I would bet that a kilo of semtex and an AK are easier to come by in Pakistan than the US. I would also bet that the downtrodden nutjobs in Pakistan feel they have a lot more to gain by blowing shit up than by participating in a political process renowned for corruption.

When crazy people have explosives and feel there's nothing to lose by using them, the problems start. Restricted access to heavy weapons and the high cost of taking up arms keeps most American nutters from detonating up car bombs right and left. In addition to Pakistan's history, the current abundance of weapons and desperation of political/religious hacks seem to be making problems.

all nationalities

You don't really have any other nationalities.

3 Pakistani.

1 or 2 Canadian.

All the rest American.

but when folks come on here and insult all of us then what do you expect?

All you Americans look the same to me the poor Asian. What do you expect?

Listen... you are a bad people. I mean it. You don't even have the brains to realize what you said until it's shoved back in your face.

Read what YS wrote about your hairlip comment.

Read what YS wrote about your hairlip comment.

if either of you knew me then you wouldn't have taken it that way.

perhaps I should have ended with a :-( to imply sarcasm.

WTF, are you Asian or Pakistani?

He must have came from mrixed marriage.

If there were 300M+ citizens in Pakistan

Pakistan has half the pop of US.

According to some bloody NGO rape in Pak is one every 2, 3 hours.

In US, it's one every 5 minutes.

If pop was equal we would be one per hour.

I would bet that a kilo of semtex and an AK are easier to come by in Pakistan than the US.

Don't know about the semtex but AKs are legal.

In addition to Pakistan's history, the current abundance of weapons and desperation of political/religious hacks seem to be making problems.

If the US had our liberal gun ownership laws.. automatics..., you would've torn yourself apart by now.

Guns are not the problem, however. Bad guys will always get guns even if you live in Paradise.

So best thing to do is, let everyone have the same weapons.

if either of you knew me then you wouldn't have taken it that way.

This is the internet and no we dont't. How can we know you? You are entering a random newspost; NOBODY will know you. That is the assumption you have to work with.

perhaps I should have ended with a :-( to imply sarcasm.

Yeah, W/E, signposting might help, use you're common sense before posting.

WTF, are you Asian or Pakistani?

Bloody idiot.....

I'm not even going to answer that.

But back to the topic of rock throwing and glass houses... no one really has the right to bitch.

Our most notable nutjob started a war based on deception, and in the end many innocents died. Can you say that yours are any different? Whether their victims are American, Iraqi, Indian, or Pakistani, these people are waging their own private wars with the blood of the public.

Can you believe this guy?

He's doing it on purpose, swear.... LOL

back to the topic of rock throwing and glass houses

I prefer Balochistan as a topic, but lol, yeah you got half a point.

no one really has the right to bitch.

I'm not the one who started bitching.

Can you say that yours are any different?