Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Saturday, October 03, 2009

Senior staff members of the United Nations nuclear agency have concluded in a confidential analysis that Iran has acquired "sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable" atom bomb. The report's conclusions go well beyond the public positions taken by several governments, including the United States.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

markh

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Go For It. I don't care. They have just as much right to nukes as Israel. Least then they would know no Rogue United States of America would attack them.

Larry

They have just as much right to nukes as Israel. Least then they would know no Rogue United States of America would attack them.
Larry
#1 | Posted by LarryMohrFLAG: always 2 sigs . . split personality?
anyways, your conclusion is logical - - therein lies the problem ...

while the rest of the world sees nukes as defensive deterrents to keep their enemies in check, Akmadinejad believes that if he starts WWIII, a little Imam will emerge from a well (or cave) - kill all the infidels, rule the Arabs for a while, then invite Jesus to help him

ya see any complications with your theory yet?

anyways, your conclusion is logical - - therein lies the problem ...

while the rest of the world sees nukes as defensive deterrents to keep their enemies in check, Akmadinejad believes that if he starts WWIII, a little Imam will emerge from a well (or cave) - kill all the infidels, rule the Arabs for a while, then invite Jesus to help him


ya see any complications with your theory yet?

#2 | Posted by markh at 2009-10-03 05:32 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

First of I always sign My posts if I feel they are important to Me. Call Me redundant or silly I don't care. I was always taught to sign Your works and be proud of it. Now on to Your topic. No I don't see a problem with Iran having Nukes. It doesn't matter one IOTA what someone says. It's their actions. "Man I am gonna kick Your fucking ass all the way to Sty Louis and back mannnn Yeah I am one tough SOB and You are a gonners." Talks cheap takes money to buy whiskey. If He did anything anything at all Israel would level Iran PDQ. I have no problems whatsoever with Iranians having 1 Nuke 2 Nukes 50 Nukes. I have no problems with it. I am NOT an Iranian so why should I give a shit. I care about what the United States of America does. That's the Country I live under.

Larry

PS We all know what the real deal is. OIL CONTROL that is it. Oil and Natural Gas.

No I don't see a problem with Iran having Nukes

Iran signed and ratified the Nuclear Non=Proliferation treaty. Why do you think it is OK for Iran to reneg on a treaty they signed?

www.fas.org

Iran signed and ratified the Nuclear Non=Proliferation treaty. Why do you think it is OK for Iran to reneg on a treaty they signed?


www.fas.org

Posted by goatman at 2009-10-03 05:51 PM | Reply


Until we live up to Our treaties we sign onto we need to shut the fuck up about other Countries violating them. Until We can lead by Example we lose the right to complain. Sorry do try again.

Larry

PS They could have unsigned themselves too like Jimmy Carter did in the late 70's

Iran signed and ratified the Nuclear Non=Proliferation treaty. Why do you think it is OK for Iran to reneg on a treaty they signed?

It isn't.

It also isn't OK for Israel to the same. In fact they're worse than Iran.

But they're our "allies" so they get a pass.

I disagree Alexandrite. Until we can behave like adults and not invade Countries Illegally Unjustly and Immorally we are morally bankrupt to say one damned word against Iran having Nukes. Just like I lost the right to condemn another drunk drive long ago. Just the way it is.

Larry

Goat, Larry is right. We don't have the right to tell others how to behave since we aren't following our own treaties. The moral high ground left us long ago.

Larry is right.

Larry is wrong

We don't have the right to tell others how to behave...

The I guess Iran should have stated that and not have signed the NPT then.

I realize that you having no honor see no issue with not honoring a contract you signed. But when the international community starts acting like you, we have big problems.

Until we live up to Our treaties we sign onto we need to shut the fuck up about other Countries violating them.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. That is a very incoherent sentence. But I think you mean that the US needs to honor its treaties or Iran shouldn't have to honor theirs.

Please tell me which treaty we have with Iran we have not honored.

Sorry do try again.

But if you think there is one, it sounds like you support the child-like "two wrongs make a right"

If the international community behaved like you, too, the world will be even worse than if they behaved like only jackass.

Grow up, Larry. Two wrongs do not make a right.

There. I tried again and am still right, Larry. You are 0 for 2

"Two years earlier, in 1951, Mosaddeq, backed by his nationalist supporters in the Iranian parliament and throughout Iran, had angered Britain with his argument that Iran should begin profiting from its vast oil reserves instead of allowing profits to continue to flow to Britain."

Overthrew Mosaddeq and a democratically elected government in 1953 - Republican American President

Gave Iran missiles weeks after they'd kidnapped Americans - Republican American President

Please, Republicans. Shut up about Iran already. You did enough damage.

Oct
03

13:11
Report Says Iran Has Data to Make a Nuclear Bomb
Tags: IRAN
Senior staff members of the United Nations nuclear agency have concluded in a confidential analysis that Iran has acquired "sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable" atom bomb.

The report by experts in the International Atomic Energy Agency stresses in its introduction that its conclusions are tentative and subject to further confirmation of the evidence, which it says came from intelligence agencies and its own investigations.
whatreallyhappened.com
Webmaster's Commentary:
Notice that this is not sourced at all, in terms of naming who actually wrote this report.


Secondly, every IAEA report on the Iranian power plant states that no nuclear material has gone missing, nor has the level of enrichment gone anywhere beyond that which is needed to fuel power a power plant. The level for weapons-grade enrichment is far higher than that.

It is obvious that some folks in certain capitals of the world are very upset that it appears that Iran and the West may be on a a course toward a restructuring of Iran's nuclear enrichment program where Iran gets its the enrichment it needs, and the West can breathe easy about Iran's nuclear ambitions.

My goodness, now; just who would be profoundly unhappy over this?!?

Take three guesses, and the first two don't count!

Iran signed and ratified the Nuclear Non=Proliferation treaty. Why do you think it is OK for Iran to reneg on a treaty they signed?

---------

America signed one against chemical weapons too fucktard. Why is it ok that we have them?

The fact is that just about every 3rd world country on the planet will have nukes in 20 years. Everyone know it. A logical response to american wars of imperialism.

YouTube - Israel's Dimona Nuclear Weapons Factory In 3D


No UN inspectors are allowed into this building and no one is ever going to ask for it either.

www.abdolian.com

America signed one against chemical weapons too fucktard. Why is it ok that we have them?

I didn't say it was did I?

Oh wait -- you weren't talking to me. My name's not fucktard. Will fucktard please answer shawn's deflection -- er -- question?

Everyone know it. A logical response to american wars of imperialism.

Look up imperialism. You'll see it does not pertain to America. I get a kick out of how much this word is mis-used.

"I get a kick out of how much this word is mis-used."

Oh, there's GoatbOob, the great political scientist now. LOL. Like there's only one, officially sponsored definition of "imperialism" brought to you by Pepsi and whatever company published his "Dictionary for the Ambitious GED Student".

"If you can't win the argument logically, change the definition of the word and insert a tired GED joke"

Dullifidian

LOL

***More Zionist War_Mongering Propaganda!!!

Holy SHIT you can easily find all the info you need to build a "nuclear bomb" on the internet! Its definitely not Rocket Science and anybody can build such a bomb if they have the essential ingredients!
The glaring fact that
reckless "War Mongering & Genocidal Israel" already has hundreds of nuclear bombs shows everybody what a large piece of "Zionist-Bullshit-Propaganda" this story certainly is!!!

" all the info you need "

It's the bits that are difficult to come by.

the promblem with iran getting a bomb is the extreme elements in iran that would steal these bombs in an act of terrosim that would start i world conforation

Go away goatbrain. You are too stupid for me to talk too.

"You are too stupid for me to talk too."

"too" as in also?

It never fails, does it?

SHAWN

If you want to call someone stupid, try to make sure you don't fall into the same category.

When is the next speech?? I want to make sure I have enough notice to take off work. Don't worry about lodging for me. I have a camping mattress I can use in the back of my van.

you as well sixpac

Sorry RASTA

You have way too much baggage . . .

As in your admission to Moder8

"I am 5-0 against the justice system as a defendant. Proceeds from illicit activities" . . . etc. etc.

I'm sure you understand.

Go away goatbrain. You are too stupid for me to talk too.

I may be stupid, but I know what imprerialism is. You don't. So if I were you, I wouldn't put myself too high on that pedestal you've got yourself on. LOL

Goat, I missed the context (read too fast), but are you suggesting that America is not an empire? That we are not imperialistic in some manner? Hm.

Also, why is it deflection to suggest that if we're going to hold others to the treaties we've signed, we should hold ourselves to the same standard. That doesn't seem like deflection to me; it seems like honor and truth and consistency.

NYT- Your kinda late on this report.

Look up imperialism. You'll see it does not pertain to America. I get a kick out of how much this word is mis-used.

#17 | Posted by goatman at 2009-10-03 10:08 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e


It's a fact that nukes will make their way around this planet.

Goat, I disagree with your stance on this.

The United States lost ALL credibility on this subject when we invaded a country that we THOUGHT may have had WMD's and POSSIBLY obtained material to begin enriching uranium. Not to mention that we fucking leveled the country and found nothing.

Why in the hell do you think the ones aginst the war were so out spoken? Most (like me) knew we didn't have a fucking reason other than oil to do it.

Now we're behind the 8-ball when we start asking for help in the international community to twist somebody's arm for making wepons.

It's not that I hate America. We plain and simply fucked up our own reputation.

And everyone who voted for that war is responsible for it R or D.

We bought it.

Own it.



www.nationmaster.com

In case anyone was wondering.

#31 Goat, I disagree with your stance on this.

???

What are you talking about? I, like you, have always said I didn't agree with the war in Iraq. What is your disagreement with me? I don't get it.

Goat, I missed the context (read too fast), but are you suggesting that America is not an empire? That we are not imperialistic in some manner? Hm.

If America made other countries abide by laws we laid down and subjugated their masses, we would be imperialistic. What many Western European countries did up to the very early 20th century (especialliy England) is imperialism.

Also, why is it deflection to suggest that if we're going to hold others to the treaties we've signed, we should hold ourselves to the same standard. That doesn't seem like deflection to me; it seems like honor and truth and consistency.

What treaty have we broken with Iran?

As i said. Too stupid for me to even bother with.

Iran signed and ratified the Nuclear Non=Proliferation treaty. Why do you think it is OK for Iran to reneg on a treaty they signed?


www.fas.org

#4 | Posted by goatman at 2009-10-03 05:51 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e


#31 Goat, I disagree with your stance on this.


???


What are you talking about? I, like you, have always said I didn't agree with the war in Iraq. What is your disagreement with me? I don't get it.

#33 | Posted by goatman at 2009-10-04 02:32 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e


Larry is right.


Larry is wrong


We don't have the right to tell others how to behave...


The I guess Iran should have stated that and not have signed the NPT then.


I realize that you having no honor see no issue with not honoring a contract you signed. But when the international community starts acting like you, we have big problems.

#9 | Posted by goatman at 2009-10-03 07:44 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e


You seem to have have the opinion that because Iran signed onto the non nuke treaty back in 1970whatever they aren't entitled to nukes.I agree with you here. Explain to me why other countries out there are doing what ever the fuck they want and we do absolutly nothing. Maybe that'll help.

Mainly Goat, I just beleive we have a lot of reputation building to do before we can go pointing fingers at countries that may be out of line.

Explain to me why other countries out there are doing what ever the fuck they want and we do absolutly nothing

Good question for Obama, isn't it? We should indeed be enforcing the NPT and take action against its violators. Maybe the current administration has too much on its plate right now.

No, it's a good question for anyone who turned a blind eye to this type of behavior. Like when the nut in N. Korea went off his rocker a few years back.

"Iran Has Knowledge to Build Nukes"

So do I and most other physicists. That doesn't mean I have the means.

Oh hell there goes Zatoichi AGAIN with His delusions of higher intelligence. bwhahahaha G-d that is Hilarious.

Larry

Physics 10 - Lecture 07: Nukes
sciencestage.com

Now you know, too.

bwhahahahahahahahahaha

Larry didn't study physics in college. Larry didn't go to college. He failed the intelligence test.

Akmadinejad believes that if he starts WWIII, a little Imam will emerge from a well (or cave) - kill all the infidels, rule the Arabs for a while, then invite Jesus to help him

So what? That sort of attitude, we called it Manifest Destiny and it led to a vast expansion of America, with only a little genocide on the side.

Are other people not allowed to think and act like Americans? Oh right they signed a treaty. Like we've never ignored a treaty before.

Se You know when Zatoichi is full of shit. He begins the insults. bwhahahahaha too fucking funy.

Larry

"Iran Has Knowledge to Build Nukes"

So do I and most other physicists. That doesn't mean I have the means.

But if North Kore can scrape together the means, you'd have to think just about any nation could.

#45 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-10-04 06:40 PM | Reply | Flag: moron

Sorry, Larry.
This is for you:
www.youtube.com

Larry didn't study physics in college. Larry didn't go to college. He failed the intelligence test.

My guess is he "failed" the middle-class test.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable