Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled.

"Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled."

Mysterytoy is a liar, and seemingly damn proud of it.

This is one of the prime reasons New Orleans was never evacuated during Katrina. People, unfathomably, wouldn't leave disabled loved ones behind.

"Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled."

Mysterytoy is a liar, and seemingly damn proud of it.

#2 | Posted by Danforth

If he's a liar then support your statement.

That's how it works around here.

I really don't expect anything. You blow a hell of a lot of smoke with nothing to back it up.

This is one of the prime reasons New Orleans was never evacuated during Katrina. People, unfathomably, wouldn't leave disabled loved ones behind.

#3 | Posted by Zed

this is just something you made up? LOL!!!

The 30,000 or so people standing on their roofs did not have disabled people in their homes.

"If he's a liar then support your statement"

Sorry dipshit, he posted the lie, and I called bullshit. It's up to the first poster to prove.

"You blow a hell of a lot of smoke with nothing to back it up."

Posts the guy who just blew smoke.

If he's a liar then support your statement.

#4 | Posted by Eddie

Why shouldn't MysteryTOOL support his statement and show everyone how any proposed plan leaves the disabled without healthcare?

Shouldn't everyone support their statements?

Oh, and that was a lie from MysteryTOOL.

"Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled."

Mysterytoy is a liar, and seemingly damn proud of it.

----------

Brownshirt.

If the crippled fuckers don't make it through the next disaster can we finally bulldoze those stupid ramps and move the drinking fountains up to the height of normal people?

#7 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2009-08-13 12:58 PM
***"Why shouldn't MysteryTOOL support his statement and show everyone how any proposed plan leaves the disabled without healthcare?"
"Shouldn't everyone support their statements?"

In a perfect world, yes. But, this is America; the idea is to blow enough smoke and bullshit from the right to obfuscate any information of any value with bull-shit...

I.E. MysTool is a conservative; backing shit up with facts isn't their strong suit...

You blow a hell of a lot of smoke with nothing to back it up.
#4 | Posted by Eddie

That has got to be the lamest, albeit also the funniest, self-retorting retort of the day.

move the drinking fountains up to the height of normal people?

But then you would have to carry around a stepstool to use them.

"You blow a hell of a lot of smoke with nothing to back it up."

Posts the guy who just blew smoke.

#6 | Posted by Danforth

you're a poser.

You're done Danforth.

you never have anything to add to the conversation.

You're done.

"Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled."

Mysterytoy is a liar, and seemingly damn proud of it.

----------

Brownshirt.

#9 | Posted by Shawn

Agreed.

Hey Eddie,
You guessed it, STFU.

If he's a liar then support your statement.

#4 | Posted by Eddie

Why shouldn't MysteryTOOL support his statement and show everyone how any proposed plan leaves the disabled without healthcare?

Shouldn't everyone support their statements?

#7 | Posted by Whatsleft

Let me do to you what Danforth does to everyone else.

Read the bill and get back to me!

Oh, and that was a lie from MysteryTOOL.

#8 | Posted by Whatsleft

Show me in the bill.

Why is everyone ignoring me!

#19 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-08-13 04:40 PM | Reply | Flag: (Choose): Feeling Alone

Show me in the bill.

#18 | Posted by Eddie

Here ya go... knock yourself out.

Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled.
#1 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-08-12 07:18 PM

Explain this.

"You're done Danforth."

Seeing as how your proclamations mean nothing at all, why on Earth do you keep posting that drivel?

"Explain this."

He won't.

He can't.

It's a bald-faced lie.

Ahem. Eddie, read #16.

Show me in the bill.

#18 | Posted by Eddie

Here ya go... knock yourself out.

thomas.loc.gov

#21 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Right. Just another clown.

Eddie's just mad because the disaster plans would leave him behind.

"Explain this."

He won't.

He can't.

It's a bald-faced lie.

#24 | Posted by Danforth

This is about YOU, Danforth.

Don't make it about someone else.

You won't! You can't!

Do you guys really think
SQWAK!
Do you guys really
SNORT!
Do you guys really think I have
SQUEAK!
Do you guys really think I have Tourette's?
TOURETTE'S!
TOURETTE'S!
SNARF! SNARF!

#20 | Posted by Eddie at 2009-08-13 04:46 PM

Mysterytoy is a liar, and seemingly damn proud of it.

#2 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-08-12 07:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

Not sure he's lying, he seems stupid enough to actually believe this drivel. But hey, misplaced outrage supported by false statements seems to be the goper's last stand.

goper's last stand.

#30 | Posted by panchovilla

I wouldn't say that.

Calling attention to this bill has not done too much good to Obama's approval ratings.

OH! that's because people in the South are racists.

When disaster strikes, Eddie's like that one kid in grade school we all remember. Left behind.

Or the fat kid in gym class.

@ Eddie,

"""I wouldn't say that."""

What would you say when you blindly support a bald faced lie?

"""Calling attention to this bill has not done too much good to Obama's approval ratings."""

Sometimes you have to displease people for their own good, especially when their beliefs are based on specious arguments supplied by the lobbyists hired by the insurance companies.

"""OH! that's because people in the South are racists."""

If you say so, the incidence seems to be higher than other regions of the states, but your blanket statement is a bit of an over-reach.

Eddie is the ugly chick at the dance during an earthquake.

Eddie is the ugly chick at the dance during an earthquake.

#35 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

You're trying to say that being singled out here?

Why not tell the truth?

Eddie, the Conservative amoung Socialists.

Why don't you just come out and just admit it? You're a Scoialist. It's not so hard.

OH! And please give your "version" of Socialism before attempting a retort. You Socialists seem to be confused about it.

Sometimes you have to displease people for their own good, especially when their beliefs are based on specious arguments supplied by the lobbyists hired by the insurance companies.

#34 | Posted by panchovilla

So the solution is to replace shit with more shit!

The Democrats' proposed health care reform does nothing but replace the Corporatism that was kicked off in the Nixon years. It was a mistake and we need to reverse it!

So the solution is to replace shit with more shit!
#37 | Posted by Eddie

Hey, Eddie, what can I say? Fish gotta swim, bats gotta fly, it's your way.

"Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled." - Mysterytoy

I've read quite a few analysies of the bill from people who's job is to read and analyze such things. None mentioned what Mysterytoy stated. So I agree that MT needs to provide support for his assertion.

This oversight in the emergency preparedness plans could wreak havoc on the Republican party!!!

Oh, wait their talking about "physical disabilities...

Nevermind...

Oh, wait their talking about "physical disabilities...

#40 | Posted by Capt_Of_Uranus at 2009-08-13 05:39 PM

#38 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Are you channeling Buff BOob today?

"""So the solution is to replace shit with more shit!"""

No, it's to give people what they need, not what they think they want.

"""The Democrats' proposed health care reform does nothing but replace the Corporatism that was kicked off in the Nixon years. It was a mistake and we need to reverse it! """

Uh, WTF?

"Obama care does the same thing. No health care for you if you're disabled." - Mysterytoy

I've read quite a few analysies of the bill from people who's job is to read and analyze such things. None mentioned what Mysterytoy stated. So I agree that MT needs to provide support for his assertion.

#39 | Posted by AILtd

Actually, I think he was talking about the man who took his disabled son to a town hall meeting.

"""So the solution is to replace shit with more shit!"""

No, it's to give people what they need, not what they think they want.

#43 | Posted by panchovilla

No! It's replacing the failed system that we have now with the same failed system, but this one is owned by the government.

#44 | Posted by Eddie

So he supposedly, if your interpretation of what Mysterytoy "meant" to say, was doing was giving an anecdote to prove a case. In that case, since anecdotes do _not_ prove cases, his effort was worthless. And doesn't support his statement.

Are you channeling Buff BOob today?
#42 | Posted by Eddie

Nope, Eddie, just the usual: watching you unravel.

"""The Democrats' proposed health care reform does nothing but replace the Corporatism that was kicked off in the Nixon years. It was a mistake and we need to reverse it! """

Uh, WTF?

#43 | Posted by panchovilla

Yeah! You said it. Thank you for being honest. It's amazing how many people want to argue a point and they have no clue about it!

I thought we were getting off topic, here, but we're not.

The article is all about how the Federal Government can't help all of the people. That's why we have the State's being responsible for their own residents. Louisiana is an example of how they, a corrupt Democrat-run State, could not help its own people when they were charged with this responsibility.

So, we learned from that and tried to fix it. We Can't at a federal level. This much is a fact.

So, now you want the government to take over a failed system and try and make it right?

I'm sorry, but the Fed's track record on this sort of thing is really bad. Ever try to get good health care from the VA that was better from a private provider just next door?

Are you channeling Buff BOob today?
#42 | Posted by Eddie

Nope, Eddie, just the usual: watching you unravel.

#47 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Really? Are you serious?

Looks like you and a few others are just behaving like children. Only a few brave souls are willing actually argue the point.

It's ok, Doc, Rogue will be along soon to call me a Nazi.

LOL, you fool.

#44 | Posted by Eddie

So he supposedly, if your interpretation of what Mysterytoy "meant" to say, was doing was giving an anecdote to prove a case. In that case, since anecdotes do _not_ prove cases, his effort was worthless. And doesn't support his statement.

#46 | Posted by AILtd

Why don't we just wait for Mysterytoy to come and defend himself.

I was just trying to shed a little light on it since many of the posts on this thread were retorting his one post.

"So, now you want the government to take over a failed system and try and make it right?"

The health care system has had problems for the last 30 years (if not longer). 20 years ago people realized that with the baby boomers about to put even more of a burden on it, the liklihood of it becoming a monetary disaster would become a distinct problem. For all those years the health care industry and the private sector have done very little so fix the problem, or even attempted to do so. Only entity left to make the attempt is the government. So it should get a shot.

"Why don't we just wait for Mysterytoy to come and defend himself."

First, he's had almost 24 hours to do so. Doesn't look like he's going to.

Second, the point was being made that he didn't need to provide support for his statement. My assertion was that he most certainly does. Still stands.

EDDIE, cynicism doesn't befit you. The research was done on why people stayed during Katrina after the storm. A prime reason people remained was sick or invalid relatives.

You have a point, me boy. These weren't the people on rooftops waiting to be saved, by-and-large. One reason for that may be that a good number of them drowned, along with their loved ones, as the storm peaked.

This shouldn't surprise you. Rescue didn't come to some nursing homes, and old folks drowned there. A lot of people died. I hope your memory isn't really that short.

The more I consider your response, EDDIE, the more annoying it seems. Many people in New Orleans were faced with the choice of moving their infirm family member, which might kill them, or keeping them where they were during the storm, which might kill them.

Hope your life is always neat and tidy. Hate to have someone make fun of you someday for making your best call.

Only entity left to make the attempt is the government. So it should get a shot.

#51 | Posted by AILtd

I don't think so. I challenge you to google Ron Paul, but only if you have an open mind.

google Ron Paul on Healthcare

you might find it eye opening. Let me know.

Really? Are you serious?
#49 | Posted by Eddie

That you regularly make a horse's ass of yourself here? You even have to ask that question?

"Ever get health care from the VA that was better than the private provider next door..."

Reminds me of the WWII vet I knew, a person who fought in Normandy---He came down with first a heart attack and then cancer. If if hadn't been for the VA, he would have died.

Seems like the private providers wouldn't see him. Now, that's sure a mystery. Just as a guess, though, I'd say their decision had to do with money.

You have a point, me boy. These weren't the people on rooftops waiting to be saved, by-and-large. One reason for that may be that a good number of them drowned, along with their loved ones, as the storm peaked.

This shouldn't surprise you. Rescue didn't come to some nursing homes, and old folks drowned there. A lot of people died. I hope your memory isn't really that short.

#53 | Posted by Zed

I remember, my relatives were there. They got out, except for my Uncle. He stayed for the reason that some stay, to watch his property. But, they got my 92-year-old grandmother out. My friend's family got their elderly out of town.

I also remember an old folks home that was not properly evacuated. It was some scary shit watching that and feeling helpless. They were left behind because their family thought they were being evacuated. How frustrating can that be!??!

But, I don't remember reading that most of the 30,000 or so needing rescue stayed because they were strapped with invalid relatives. Oh, I'm sure there were some, but not all of them.

Do you have links to this?

thomas.loc.gov

#21 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Right. Just another clown.

#26 | Posted by Eddie

So you actually DON'T want to read the bill - you're satisfied with just spouting the talking points you've been fed.

Well, alrighty then.

Really? Are you serious?
#49 | Posted by Eddie

That you regularly make a horse's ass of yourself here? You even have to ask that question?

#56 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-08-13 06:19 PM | Reply | Flag: Currently Making a Horse's Ass of Himself

Did I mention self-retorting?

My point was those with sick family, by and large, would not be on roofs because their responsibilities were on ground level. So, depending on exactly where they were at the time of peak flooding, most of those people drowned.

Another prime reason many people didn't evacuate was because they'd done that before and the experience was hell. Again, people making best selections from available alternatives.

It's ok, Doc, Rogue will be along soon to call me a Nazi.

LOL, you fool.

#49 | Posted by Eddie

Actually, I've never called anyone a Nazi in my life. You'll need to take that one up with your buddy Billo.

So you actually DON'T want to read the bill - you're satisfied with just spouting the talking points you've been fed.

Well, alrighty then.

#59 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue at 2009-08-13 06:27 PM | Reply | Flag: Horses tend to travel together

By the way - I saw you trying to curry favor with Kanrei earlier. Skipping around like an excited puppy, sniffing a bigger dog's butt and hoping he'll tolerate you instead of kicking you to the curb like all the others do. "Please, please like me! I promise to be a good little poster!"

Ugh.

Actually, I've never called anyone a Nazi in my life. You'll need to take that one up with your buddy Billo.

#62 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Just relax, Rogue. We are all just abusing one another here. It's part of the game.

I wish it weren't though.

Horses tend to travel together

#63 | Posted by Eddie

And dung beetles tend to be alllllll alone.

We are all just abusing one another here. It's part of the game.

I wish it weren't though.

#65 | Posted by Eddie

With you its mostly self-abuse. Story of your life, I imagine.

you're satisfied with just spouting the talking points you've been fed.

Well, alrighty then.

#59 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

When you don't want to argue something you call it a "talking point"?

Where's the link this "talking point."

But, first, you have to define what a "talking point" is.

Since it so painfully obvious you haven't read the bill, I thought it might be a great starting point for you. My bad.

We are all just abusing one another here. It's part of the game.

I wish it weren't though.

#65 | Posted by Eddie

With you its mostly self-abuse. Story of your life, I imagine.

#67 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Sorry, Rogue, but without you, Doc, and a few other children posting garbage, we'd actually be having an intelligent conversation.

Have you seen Doc say anything halfway useful lately?

Since it so painfully obvious you haven't read the bill, I thought it might be a great starting point for you. My bad.

#69 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

How much of the bill have you read?

Since it so painfully obvious you haven't read the bill, I thought it might be a great starting point for you. My bad.

#69 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

But you, as usual, are missing the point and ramrodding useless rhetoric (speaking of regurgitating talking points)

I am upset that Congress is voting on a bill that they haven't read either!

Please! Stick to the subject and stop moving the goal posts around. PLEASE!

Sorry, Rogue, but without you, Doc, and a few other children posting garbage, we'd actually be having an intelligent conversation.

Have you seen Doc say anything halfway useful lately?

#70 | Posted by Eddie

Of course. We all have good conversations and heated, but intelligent debates with lots of other posters. It seems to be you and your ever-shifting positions that are the debate killer.

Did I mention self-retorting?
#60 | Posted by Eddie

I'm not sure if you've mentioned it, Eddie. I thought it was something you just sort of did automatically. You don't really have to spend any time thinking about the drivel you slap up here, do you?

Will you be moving out of the basement anytime soon?

How much of the bill have you read?

#71 | Posted by Eddie

All of it. It took a few days, but its do-able. Plus, the handy-dandy little link you so fearfully dismissed makes it very easy to look up specific parts.

Pity you're more interested in what someone tells you it says than finding out for yourself.

By the way - I saw you trying to curry favor with Kanrei earlier. Skipping around like an excited puppy, sniffing a bigger dog's butt and hoping he'll tolerate you instead of kicking you to the curb like all the others do. "Please, please like me! I promise to be a good little poster!"

Ugh.

#64 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

How come you sound female?

You got all over me for saying that you are female, yet you sound like a woman.

You come off as an aggressive woman who is constantly looking for the self-reliant, conservative confident male who you think should be taken down a few notches.

Am I far off?

I'm just wondering why you are attacking me so?

Pity you're more interested in what someone tells you it says than finding out for yourself.

#75 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

OK, I'll take your challenge. I'll read the whole thing.

But, again, you missed the point.

I am not worried about the content. I'm upset that many Congressmen will vote on it without reading it!!

Which do you think is more important?

BTW, can you point to the part where it talks about the Disabled?

I'm just wondering why you are attacking me so?

#76 | Posted by Eddie

From an SNL sketch from before you were born, because you're such a dip.

Eddie, how many bills are there???

Which one would you read???

Which parts of the multiple bills will be in the final draft???

You don't know do you. Why? Because no one does.

They haven't written a finished bill yet fool.

I swear, you hear a right wing talking point and just repeat it no matter how stupid it makes you look. Get a clue, talking points are not facts, they aren't based on facts. Many of them are just plain lies. Learn something about the subject, don't just repeat talking points.

You come off as an aggressive woman who is constantly looking for the self-reliant, conservative confident male who you think should be taken down a few notches.
#76 | Posted by Eddie | Flag: Uh-Oh, Eddie's Gonna Shoot His Wad

"I'm upset that many Congressmen will vote on it without reading it!!"

How about the one's who will vote against it without reading it. They have already decided they are opposed to anything Obama does, it isn't about health care for many Republicans, it's about wrecking the Obama presidency.

I am not worried about the content.

#77 | Posted by Eddie

If you're not "worried" about the content, and haven't read it, then stop trying to tell others what is or isn't in it.

Of course. We all have good conversations and heated, but intelligent debates with lots of other posters. It seems to be you and your ever-shifting positions that are the debate killer.

#73 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Then why do you and Doc come here?

No, I think I'm right about you.

It's so much more than that.

I am not worried about the content.

#77 | Posted by Eddie

If you're not "worried" about the content, and haven't read it, then stop trying to tell others what is or isn't in it.

#82 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Where did I say that? You're a LIAR!

You come off as an aggressive woman who is constantly looking for the self-reliant, conservative confident male who you think should be taken down a few notches.

#76 | Posted by Eddie

If that WERE true, I certainly wouldn't waste my time on someone like you, who doesn't fit the criteria.

Here you go, Eddie, knock yourself out: thomas.loc.gov

#84 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc, you hypocrite, you didn't read it.

Point to the place where it talks about the Disabled.

You won't do it.

You're such a horse's ass.

Have you read HR 3200, Eddie?

If you're not "worried" about the content, and haven't read it, then stop trying to tell others what is or isn't in it.

#82 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

OMG! What an ass!

I'm worried about the Congressmen not reading it before they vote on it.

"you didn't read it."

You've no way of knowing whether I have or haven't. Have you read it, Eddie?

"Point to the place where it talks about the Disabled."

Actually, I'd like to see you do that, Eddie, since you claim to know so much about what's in the bill you almost certainly haven't read. Have you read it, Eddie?

"You won't do it."

That's correct, because I'd like to see you pull that one out of your ass. Go on, Eddie, you can do it. Can't you?

"#87 | Posted by Eddie"

But of course.

Have you read HR 3200, Eddie?

Well, have you?

Have you read HR 3200, Eddie?

#91 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Sshhh. He's reading it now and will get back to you in 2 minutes.

LOL!

Okay, I'm done.

I mean, I did some speed reading so I might've missed a couple of minor details.

But, as a great man once said, "Mission Accomplished!"

There's just one thing I don't understand about HR 3200.

Those Death Panels, are they powered by solar energy or regular electrical current?

~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

Eddie's mom kicked him off the computer until he cleans his room.

Hey Eddie, it would be far easier for you and for congress to real HR 676, Medicare for all. It isn't anywhere near 1000 pages. Probably 1 0r 2.

Actually, American should have a health care bill we could all read in a few minutes.

"Medicare for all."

Gee, that's easy.

I did see the latest amendment added to HR 3200 earlier today regarding the death panels...

It is explained here:

Just days after leaving her judge's post at "American Idol," singer Paula Abdul announced that her next gig will be serving on the nation's very first death panel.

While details of the panel remain sketchy, Ms. Abdul said that it will most likely be showcased on a reality show, tentatively called "So You Think You Can Live."...

News of Ms. Abdul's new duties raised eyebrows in official Washington, where many questioned whether the former "Idol" judge had the qualifications to make life-or-death decisions.

But for her part, Ms. Abdul was dismissive of the naysayers: "Hello, I held Clay Aiken's life in my hands. Whatever. Where am I again?"

(Andy Borowitz)

#90 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Actually, I cry BULLSHIT. If you have read it, then you can point to the place where it talks about the disabled.

I haven't read it. I will when Congress reads it.

However, Rogue has challenged me to read it. He said that he's read it and I challenged him to find the place in the bill where it talks about the disabled.

So, in short, Doc, I called you on your bullshit, so put up or shut up.

I challenged him to find the place in the bill where it talks about the disabled.

#100 | Posted by Eddie

The answer, Eddie, is nowhere, and everywhere. You'll understand what I mean after you've read it.

Eddie - you love to keep saying "I called". But generally when you do that you should have a winning hand. You usually don't even have any cards.

Eddie - you love to keep saying "I called". But generally when you do that you should have a winning hand. You usually don't even have any cards.

#102 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

I do have cards, but you don't. I think you make this up as you go.

So, Eddie, you haven't read it.

You're going to wait until "Congress reads it," but, of course, you haven't a clue how many members of Congress have read it and won't know, ever, how many have read it so...you're... just... blowing...it...out...your...as
s. Quelle sooprise! Eddie.

Then you want to know "where" it mentions the disabled?

Eddie, are you fucking nuts or just brain-dead stupid?

Not only to you usually not have any cars, as SA cogently observes, but, Eddie, please, for love of Jeebus, you dont even have a pair.

But, Rogue,

Seriously, I want to discuss this more intelligently. I will read the bill if you read up on Ron Paul's approach to Health Care reform. You can start anywhere; he's been pretty consistent for decades.

I do have cards
#103 | Posted by Eddie

I do, I do, I do, I do, I DO, TOO, HAVE CARDS!

I have the Ace of Sneed, King of Snoof, Queen of Zirconia, the Thirteen of Hoops, and the One of Goose Eggs. Wild cards, every one of 'em!

~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

Seriously, I want to discuss this more intelligently.
#105 | Posted by Eddie

ROTFLAMO!

I do have cards, but you don't. I think you make this up as you go.

#103 | Posted by Eddie

You see Eddie, that's the beauty of doing a little research. I've read the bill. Now, of course, I haven't memorized it, but I know how to go in and find different topics in different sections.

So I don't have to make anything up! If I don't know something, I look it up. Et voila!

You, on the other hand, call someone a clown who provides you with a valid, respected link to get the very same information for yourself.

Hmmmm.

Seriously, I want to discuss this more intelligently.
#105 | Posted by Eddie

Seriously, Eddie, but you can't.

"Start with this one, www.youtube.com It's got a lot of information in it and only takes 7 minute"

You Paultards are like religious nuts. Just read this pamphlet!

#109 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc!

You haven't read the bill and you dare challenge me on it?

Just watching you unravel, Doc.

Why do you do this every time? You come here trying to discredit me. Why? Do I threaten you that much? Then you accomplish nothing more than behave like a child.

You, on the other hand, call someone a clown who provides you with a valid, respected link to get the very same information for yourself.

Hmmmm.

#108 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Why do you do this? I try to have an adult conversation with you and give you a little respect and then you turn around and behave like a child and stabb me in the back.

You are an aggressive woman! I really think so. Your moods change like the song...

"She's always a woman to me"

Rogue: Always a woman...
Doc: Unraveling...

What next?

"I try to have an adult conversation with you and give you a little respect"

...

"You are an aggressive woman!"
#112 | Posted by Eddie

Dude, you must be the stupidest fuck alive.

#111 | Posted by Eddie:

"You haven't read the bill"

Eddie, I daresay I've read a good deal more of this bill that you have. Or, for that matter, ever will.

"and you dare challenge me on it?"

Yes, Eddie, I "dare" to call your bullshit "bullshit."

"You come here trying to discredit me."

No, Eddie, you do a bang-on job of that yourself.

"Why?"

Something in your blood, maybe? A genetic tick, perhaps? Too much crap consumed out of too many alumninum cans?

"Do I threaten you that much?"

Yeah, Eddie, you've really got people on this thread on the run. LOL!

Eddie - no one here discredits you but you. We just have a little fun at your expense, although I'm starting to feel a little guilty.

Originally I thought you were just a whacko nutjob spouting off stuff you probably knew was BS. Now I'm fairly convinced that you're really just not very bright, and making fun of you would be wrong.

What next?
#113 | Posted by Eddie

Well, I just checked my watch and my guess is your bedtime is probably what's next.

I have seen many men here who act aggressive as well as irrationally, Eddie. The "aggressive woman" line you use as an insult does not help you win a discussion nor does it give you credibility.

HEY! I'm not agggressive OR irrational. And if you say that again I'll scratch, uhm, err, punch your lights out!

Dude, you must be the stupidest fuck alive.

#114 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-08-13 07:49 PM | Reply | Flag: Self Retorting

This shit writes itself!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HEY! I'm not agggressive OR irrational. And if you say that again I'll scratch, uhm, err, punch your lights out!

#119 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

FF

I have seen many men here who act aggressive as well as irrationally, Eddie. The "aggressive woman" line you use as an insult does not help you win a discussion nor does it give you credibility.

#118 | Posted by Lisa

I didn't mean it as an insult, just an observation.

And, I really don't expect to make headway with Rogue and Doc. They routinely visit me and give my all levels of crap and I give it right back. It's a game to keep us from becoming too bored while waiting for the intelligence to return.

And, wait, LOL!!! You think that their insults to me give them credibility?

Are you serious? Have you been paying attention?

No, but really. Void of any other stimulus, Rogue comes off as a college-aged woman going for her law degree. She gonna take some white guys down! Don't ask me why it's so specific.

Originally I thought you were just a whacko nutjob spouting off stuff you probably knew was BS. Now I'm fairly convinced that you're really just not very bright, and making fun of you would be wrong.

#116 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Nice try, Rogue, and you told me this a few months ago, the last time I got your goat.

You're not fooling me.

You and Doc play with me because I am the only one of your opposition who actually responds to you.

It would be nice if you were more intelligent and less on the childish insults.

BTW, I wrote Doc off as a hypocrit. He hasn't read the bill and he knows it.

Anyway on with the show!

She gonna take some white guys down!

#122 | Posted by Eddie

Oh my. In addition to being a misogynist, our little Eddie is a bit of a racist too.

My oh my.

Don't ask me why it's so specific.

TMI unintentionally shared.

I am the only one of your opposition who actually responds to you.

#123 | Posted by Eddie

Big LOL!

Anyway, Rogue, I'm going to read the bill as painful as it will be and you have to read up on Ron Paul on Health care.

Your job is so much easier. This is not fair at all.

But we both know that neither one of these ideas are going to be adopted by Congress. No way will Obama's bill pass.

And no way will anyone ever want to approach Ron Paul's ideas.

To many rich and All powerful people have too much to lose if we go either way.

It's a battle that will go on forever.

But, what do you have to lose but a little ignorance.

She gonna take some white guys down!

#122 | Posted by Eddie

Oh my. In addition to being a misogynist, our little Eddie is a bit of a racist too.

My oh my.

#124 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

How is this racist?

(If you don't know, I;m not gonna tell ya)

Wow! If you see this as racist then you must be a racist.

Don't ask me why it's so specific.

TMI unintentionally shared.

#125 | Posted by YAV

It's weird, I don't know how to describe it, but he/she really is channeling some aggressive upwardly mobile law school chick that's out to prove her/himself to the confident self-reliant male.

It's weird, I don't know how to describe it, but he/she really is channeling some aggressive upwardly mobile law school chick that's out to prove her/himself to the confident self-reliant male.

#129 | Posted by Eddie

That's it Eddie! Hang on to that like a life preserver on the Lusitania!

: )

Ewwwwwwww!

How is this a story?

It's nothing new. Oh wait...I get it.

OBAMA'S FAULT!!!!

#131 | Posted by CalifChris

FF

So what, the plan should be for getting the majority safe and the secondary is for those disabled.

So what, the plan should be for getting the majority safe and the secondary is for those disabled.

#135 | Posted by moneywar

None of these local governments were able to come up with one.

I am a conservative and have a sincere, conservative question: Is Eddie fucking retarded? Anyone can feel free to answer this for me.

comes off as a college-aged woman going for her law degree. She gonna take some white guys down! Don't ask me why it's so specific.
#122 | Posted by Eddie

Nice job tearing yourself down, Eddie. You really do sound like you've got some serious issues you ought to give some thought to addressing.

#138 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

When you open your mouth, fog comes out.

WHAT?

I am a conservative and have a sincere, conservative question
#137 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

You're more of a Lib than Rogue and not as smart as Doc.

did I mention that you are a LIAR?

Why shouldn't MysteryTOOL support his statement and show everyone how any proposed plan leaves the disabled without healthcare?

Shouldn't everyone support their statements?

#7 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2009-08-13 12:58 PM

I typed in "Obama care bad for disabled" into the google and got 1,520,000 hits.

Maybe you can start there. I know it will be tuff to leave this place to actually read/research other outlooks on the dem health care plan as well as other outlooks on life, but try it. You never know you might actually enjoy learning.

I once read a protocol for doctors to follow during catastrophes. It has always been like that.
When faced with a sea of need, those with the best chance of survival and producing a next generation are triaged ahead of the rest. Children are at the head of the line but "necessary personnel" (i.e. soldiers in war) come absolutely first. The disabled and those less able to care for themselves are last.
It has always been the protocol. Nothing new.

Another slap in this face to the retards from President Obama.

First, the pile of dogshit Obama compares his shitacular bowling skills to being "like the Special Olympics or something."

Then, he makes sure that if there is a disaster they all die.

Why does Obama hate the tards?