Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, July 12, 2009

"Our watershed moment to change the world economic system has not just been squandered, we have inadvertently reinforced the same structures and institutions that have created the mess in the first place," economist Samah El-Shahat writes for Al Jazeera. "[W]e went from having 15 banks to having around six. And these remaining banks have more power as their importance is now set in regulatory stone -- and they know it. Instead of bringing the banking sector to heel -- we have given it a kiss of life and pumped it with steroids."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

"Big Banks More Powerful Than Ever"

And this is a surprise?

No shit, since we gave them billions of dollars.

Change we can believe in!

Bring back the firing squad.

Fuck that, where's the guillotine?

Goldman Sach tried to shut this sit down.

www.goldmansachs666.com

The article from Martin Armstrong is especially telling.

Yeah, the banks are using every criminal trick in the book to hide the true state of their finances.

This is a good thread and I hope all post.

These bankers have manipulated our economy and lively hoods forever since weak ass Wilson bowed down to these bankers.

Keep cash and silver, (gold if you have the wealth.)

The bailouts worked!

"economist Samah El-Shahat writes for Al Jazeera"

I will dance on you fucking ragheads' graves when we tell oil companies to piss the fuck off.

Ray,

The Armstrong article has been removed.

But there is plenty of other stuff:

Retail and institutional investors have been stunned at recent stock market volatility. The general thinking is that it is related to the global financial crisis, starting, in August 2007, when the Volatility Index, or VIX, started to climb. However, there are more fundamental reasons behind the explosion in trading volume and the speed at which stock prices and indexes are changing. It has to do with the
way electronic trading, the new for-profit exchanges and ECNs, the NYSE Hybrid and the SEC's Regulation NMS have all come together in unexpected ways, starting, coincidently, in late summer of 2007.

This has resulted in the proliferation of a new generation of very profitable, high-speed, computerized trading firms and methods that are causing retail and institutional investors to chase artificial prices. Today liquidity rebate traders, predatory algorithmic traders, automated market makers, and program traders are exploiting the new market dynamics and negatively affecting real investors. Rebate trading computer makes a penny per share, and has caused the institutional investor to pay a penny higher per share.

WHAT CAN BE DONE?

Forget about short sale restrictions. From a regulatory point of view, two simple, powerful rules would help to eliminate much of the problem.

1. Make orders valid for at least one second. That will eliminate the pinging. High frequency traders will expose themselves. One second would destroy their ability to immediately cancel it if nothing is there.

2. Reinstate the 2% curb on program trading. When the market is down 3% or 4%, that's when the program traders can really juice it. The SEC, however, has to institute the curb across the board so no market center has an advantage over another.

With these two rules, half the volume of the exchanges and ECNs might go away. The market centers, however, will surely fight it because they don't want to lose the trading volume and the resultant tape revenue.

Until then, what can investors do? Retail investors are sitting ducks, institutional investors should not "walk away from the machine" after they have entered an algo order.

The facts remain.

We as people must surpass these bankers. For along time now we as people have remained peons to the bankers.

Easy money.

Now, Libtard or Rtard, are we going let these bookies continue????

Get a fucking job and then get back to me. I understand there are several paper routes available in your area.

There is only one way to slow down the violent Depression we are headed for. We must go after the crooks and make them pay the consequences for their greed and total disregard for anyone other than themselves. We need to start with Hank Paulson, who as CEO of Goldman Sachs, was more responsible than any 10 men combined, for the violent Depression we are about to enter. The bottom line is consequences for the crooks AND consequences for the consumers that traded homes like penny stocks and used their homes like ATM machines . . . buying jet skis, cars, boats, vacation homes, $2,000 pocket books, $30 cigars and just about anything else that put some flair in their peacock feathers.

excerpted from Michael Morgan's favorites, the religious creator of www.goldmansachs666.com

its loaded with biblical quotes

Nutcase

Here's another link from Martin Armstrong on Goldman Sachs and everything he's written lately.

Looking Behind the Curtain

This one on market cycles is especially good too.

Understanding the Real Economy

As a side note, Armstrong has been in jail for seven years with no trial.

Nutcase - 1. Make orders valid for at least one second.
2. Reinstate the 2% curb on program trading.

Yeah, convert the stock market to Socialism, great plan. :)

too big to fail = socialism for the rich. fuck you

#12 | Posted by LetUsPrey

Define who you speak to.

"Dumbfuck : Wurster. So-called newbie poster to Drudge Report. Willing to bet he changed his handle after getting booted yet again."

How's that for a definition, you irreputable darvon-popping zombification of a human being?

Right.

LETUSPREY.

I've never changed my handle and the rest you can ask Rcade.

I work very hard as a cabinet maker. I do very nice work. Work that the wealthy are happy to pay me to do. It is how I make my living. Work even you would be happy to have in your house.

So. If you don't like my opinion that is acceptable but don't put yourself out on a limb and critisize what I do for a living.

I work very hard for my wife, my children, and what we got.

While I have always considered your opinion I will not continue to do so.

I work very hard for my wife, my children, and what we got.

LetUsBray is jealous of people who work hard and get what they deserve. Just ignore him. Sometimes he'll go away, but sometimes he just hangs around and continues to make a fool of himself. Just hope for the best

Says you, you oil-drilling pussy.

"While I have always considered your opinion I will not continue to do so.

#19 | Posted by wurster"

Is this the part where I'm supposed to care? Just let me know.

...oil-drilling pussy.

That's ET pussy, not oil drilling pussy. Don't you ever get anything right, letusbray?

Goat losing another debate I see.

#24 | Posted by jackass

Dumb ass post.

#22 | Posted by LetUsPrey

I don't care if you care or not. You have shown yourself as another angry liberal.

I have many liberal friends, (some of which are socialist,) that can at least argue. You call names and insult. Therefore your opinion is invalid. What you care of any opinion is therefore regardless. You are empty. A bottomless pit of hatred.

...another angry liberal.

Isn't it odd that the angriest people on the blog are liberals? I mean seriously -- think about it. Is there anyone who spews such angst and venom as letusbray, celery, shawn, angrydad, newyawker, commonesense, et al? That's not to say all liberals are angry, but certainly the angry ones are liberal.

What's up with that, anyway? It has to be a personality flaw. Normal people don't behave that way.

Goatman-
re: Isn't it odd that the angriest people on the blog are liberals?

It is true that Johnson is very calm in his posts about the genetic inferiority of various colored "races".

Sorry, Goatman. I think the term that Johnson uses is "breeds", when discussing non-whites.

I don't recall you ever having a problem with him, though.

#26 | Posted by goatman

I agree. I hope these folks aren't as angry in life as they are on this blog. What a waste.

Really you deserve what you get. Life is hard so make the best of it.

I don't recall you ever having a problem with him, though.

???

And why do you bring this up? I don't recall you having problems with a lot of people, too.

So?

Back on subject.

I love my bank. Whitefish Credit Union

Savings and loan. Every penny fare for audit.

No, Goatman. You have a problem with many posters, but not a voluminously rabid frequently posting racist.

You ignore his posts. He's a "conservative", after all.

Goatman-
re: And why do you bring this up? I don't recall you having problems with a lot of people, too.

Name an ostensible "liberal" who posts such stupid or vile things whom I haven't actively crossed on purpose on multiple occasions.

No, Goatman. You have a problem with many posters, but not a voluminously rabid frequently posting racist.

???

I'm still missing your point. There are a lot of people you don't seem to have a problem with, too. Am I supposed to condemn all those you deem unworthy?

Get real. Live your own life and quit trying to live mine for me. I don't do that to you, do I?

Name an ostensible "liberal" who posts such stupid or vile things whom I haven't actively crossed on purpose on multiple occasions.

Since I don't pretend to have read every one of your posts, that is an absurd request.

Can't think of one?

But you have NEVER challenged a frequent poster whose main wordy point is that certain "breeds" (the browner ones) are genetically inferior?

I don't tell you how to blog. I expect you to not tell me how to, boyd.

How arrogant.

Yeah GOAT?

Why arn't you our own DR post police?

Why arn't you our own DR post police?

When you got people like boyd who tell you who you should censure?

Goatman-
Maybe you "conservatives" need everyone you can get. I can't think of a "liberal" poster you haven't challenged. Can you?

Name a frequent "liberal" poster you haven't challenged, Goat.

As Beetlejuice said Goat.

It is your responsibility to point out and criticize every racist or bigot comment from every poster on this DR.

You been slacking man.

...you haven't challenged.

I don't tell you how to blog. I expect you to not tell me how to, boyd.

How arrogant.

Goatman-
But you have not ONE post to a "conservative" who types many and frequent diatribes about the inferiority of the "mud people"?

It's time to clean your own house, bud.

Name a frequent "liberal" poster you haven't challenged, Goat.

Americanunity.

Now get a life and leave mine alone, creep.

I think Beetle Fart is missing the fact that most blog here to challenge. To argue. It makes for a better rounded opinion.

Beetle Fart. Another angry liberal.

Another angry liberal.

He definitely belongs on that list.

Since I don't pretend to have read every one of your posts, that is an absurd request.

If there was an "Ignore" option you wouldn't read any I'm guessing since almost every one of the posts of the person you're addressing is an attempt to get you to trip up or justify her views about something/something.

It is your responsibility to point out and criticize every racist or bigot comment from every poster on this DR.

Of course it's not. Goatman rightly sees that, for whatever his flaws, Johnson is on his ideological side.

I criticize those on the left who say stupid things, but to the "conservatives" on this blog it's as if Johnson doesn't even exist. I have not read one post from any on the right condemning his crap.

I have heard either praise or silence.

It's time to clean your own house, bud.

IOW, be critical of those that you feel deserve criticism.

I'll say it one more time -- I don't tell you how to blog or of whom to be critical and I expect the same of you.

Or, may I give you my list of people whom I believe deserve criticism from you and expect you to "clean your house" too? If so, fine. I'll play that game -- bud. We on?

I would think that the "conservatives" would wish to distance themselves from the overt racists, just as I gave frequent hell to the truthers and other assorted nuts.

Sadly, no.

Goatman-
re: may I give you my list of people whom I believe deserve criticism from you and expect you to "clean your house" too? If so, fine. I'll play that game -- bud. We on?

I think I asked you for at least one example twice. You gave no response.

I'll bet Boyd's obsession with johnsons is not a new thing.

As still the point of the influence of big banks.

To these bankers the money of an Rtard is as good as a libdumbfuck. Let's just see that.

We must move as a society beyond this. We deserve what we have gotten. It is time to OWN IT.

I don't want to pay for this but I would rather myself than my children.

"Corrections" can be a GOOD THING.

You gave no response.

Again, you prove my assertion that you read what you want to and ignore the rest.

We on or not? I get to tell you who you must criticize just as you assume you have the right to command me.

We on?

Name one, goatman. If I've missed the idiot and deem it worthy of criticism I'll do it on the spot, which is more than I can say for you!

Goatman-
Even after having it pointed out, you have not said one negative word about our resident racist, and I suspect you won't ever.

He's a part of your coalition, or so it seems thus far...

Okay.

For 24 hours starting at the Monday Nooner.

Beetlefart gets Buffalo Boob.

Goat gets Sniper.

What do you boys think?

Bye, boyd. I don't need you to tell me what I should say in my posts. If you weren't such a pussy you'd accept my challenge. But like da bOoB, you want an uneven playing field and your own set of rules. Clearly you don't want me dictating people you should be critical of, but you have no problem telling me who I should criticize.

Grow up.

Wurster-
Ask Buffalo Bob about me. I went after him until I got sick of it, dumbass.

Goatman-

re: Bye, boyd.

You got nuthin', huh?

I hope you and your friends like Johnson will forge a rebirth of the "conservative" Republican revolution. LOL.

You got nuthin', huh?

???

Yea, I got a challenge that you won't respond to. LOL

Nighty-night, Goatman.

Be sure to yuk it up about the inferior breeds with Johnson. Better yet, just pretend you ignore him while enabling him. You need everyone you can get!

Danforth

You got nuthin', huh?

Also, I'm waiting for you to admit you were wrong in your #53. I also want you to tell me why you think you have the right to dictate my posts.

Goat-
I FUCKING ASKED YOU FOR AN EXAMPLE MORE THAN ONCE OVER THE LAST HOUR! GIVE IT, OR STFU AND GO TO BED!

(Do the caps help you understand simple things?)

As usual -- boyd chickens out without addressing my questions, but he will be lurking and will see this so here's to you boyd, chicken shit.

You'll gain a little respect if you come back like a man and address my issus. Until then, you are nothing but a self proven eunuch.

Night, night baby boyd. As usual, you have nothing. LOL

Man. You are a pathetic shadow of your formal self, Goatman.

Later.

Man. You are a pathetic shadow of your formal self, Goatman.

You, OTOH, are as pitiful as ever.

Still can't answer my simple question, huh? LOL

I FUCKING ASKED YOU FOR AN EXAMPLE MORE THAN ONCE OVER THE LAST HOUR! GIVE IT, OR STFU AND GO TO BED!

(Do the caps help you understand simple things?)

AND I SAID TWICE I ANSWERED IT. SEE POST 45

You tell me. Did the caps help? Care to admit you were wrong?

Of course not. Grow up, boyd.

"Our watershed moment to change the world economic system has not just been squandered, we have inadvertently reinforced the same structures and institutions that have created the mess in the first place," economist Samah El-Shahat writes for Al Jazeera. "[W]e went from having 15 banks to having around six. And these remaining banks have more power as their importance is now set in regulatory stone -- and they know it. Instead of bringing the banking sector to heel -- we have given it a kiss of life and pumped it with steroids."
And "liberals" will give it a pass because Dems are running the show.

And "liberals" will give it a pass because Dems are running the show.

#72 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

Well, a lot of posters are all about self-aggrandizement when "their guy" is in charge. It's a good excuse to poke the "other guy" in the eye!

That many of the same edifices are being rebuilt, reinforced, and in some ways reinvented (Goldman Sachs has restructured itself so as to become a direct recipient of money from the Fed, for example) to me signals a clear intention of where Wall Street's "Masters of the Universe" want to lead us.

Two-party politics is a diversion at best; realistically, it's sham democracy or worse.

But, it happens to work - everyone is fighting about this-or-that minor scandal, while the real crimes are being committed with banking software and money minted out of nothingness, instead of secret police and gulags.

Following custom, the robber barons and other stewards of today's economy attend most assiduously to their own pursuit of material gain no matter the expense to others. The best part of the deal? At their behest, the government lines their pockets!

The oligarchy now robs the rest of the world blind under the banner of a Democratic president instead of a Republican; the only thing which has changed is the political affiliation of those cheerleading for avarice and their party of choice.

Would you rather them to be big and more powerful, or would you have preferred to pay for their liquidations?

MANY here called for EXACTLY THAT!

I had big bets they would survive, and those thoughts were confirmed by paul volcher shortly before the stress test results were announced.

Now the subject nutcase alludes to there is extremely important. The cat came out of the bag when GS had that software expert arrested for stealing their trading software codes compromised. They have some sort of program trading system that games the exchanges, using ULTRA fast executions that get ahead of merely fast executions.

It sounds as if they are trading "ahead" of the program/hedge funders!!!!!!!

Trading ahead is illegal. It means having knowledge of large orders and placing your trades in front of others, violating your 'fiduciary' responsibilities.

Man, the thread started out well and goatman and betel just ruined it.

RCADE should delete their whole segment.

Interesting article Ray, I enjoyed the whole thing. A lot to digest at one sitting.

Man, the thread started out well and goatman and betel just ruined it.

WAAAAAH!

RCADE should delete their whole segment.

Maybe you should start your own blog and run it as you see fit. You seem to have a lot of problems with how this one is run.

ROTFLMAO!

These libtard ranters against Goat remind me of school girls squabbling in their clique against that one who is prettier and smarter than they are!

Get a life losers!

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable