After years as a projectionist in the 70's, I know how film looks when when some frames have been removed. When done skillfully, no one notices--even changing from one projector to another is done unknowingly to the audience--hopefully.

This video clearly shows the editing process done on the released video from the Pentagon attack.

Why was it edited, and why hasn't the real footage been released? The American people have every right to know what is on the unedited video.

After years as a projectionist in the 70's, I know how film looks when when some frames have been removed.

boob was soon fired by the theatre manager after being caught using scissors and scotch tape.

The American people have every right to know what is on the unedited video.

I'll take it one step further:

They have a right to know what is on that unedited video, AND the dozens of tapes that were confiscated in the hours after the incident by the FBI.

After years as a projectionist in the 70's

Bob's name then was Buffalo Softy..

I thought he was a successful stand up comic in the 70's. Can BoOB not even keep his delusions straight anymore?

delusion about Pentagon lies?

'The Pentagon Papers' revisited for those who have forgotten:>)

What is this? Our Government would never lie to us! Now where are those dang WMDs?

Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" President George W. Bush, joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner , Washington, D.C., March 24, 2004

What's the motive for releasing fake footage 8 years later. Does it take 8 years to create fake footage? Don't you think they could have done a better job?

If you slow down the frames from the second video you can clearly see something that looks like wings on the object that hit the pentagon. But, I did not see the explosion at all. He says it took 15 seconds? How does he know that?

The biggest question is what happened to flight 77 if it did not hit the pentagon? How could you possibly cover that up.

Don't you think they could have done a better job?

#8 | Posted by mysterytoy at 2009-07-06 03:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

You would think so, but they didn't. Why should they? There are people who swear they can see a plane in that video. There are millions who think it is logical that a smoky oxygen starved fire weakened steel, so why go to very much trouble to fool such a gullible audience who will believe whatever you tell them?

The biggest question is what happened to flight 77 if it did not hit the pentagon? How could you possibly cover that up.
#9 | Posted by donnerboy

With the Atlantic Ocean?

Surveillance cameras aren't the best cameras in the world anyway. If the DVR doesn't have a time stamp they aren't admissable in court.

The biggest question is what happened to flight 77 if it did not hit the pentagon? How could you possibly cover that up.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2009-07-06 03:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

There are questions about that flight that need to be answered. Only one passenger made a call from that flight--Barbara Olson, Fox News Commentator--wife of Ted Olson who was the United States Solicitor General at the time of 911. Barbara supposedly called twice--collect. You can't call collect with a cell phone, and her plane didn't have any seat back phones. Her calls supposedly went through a secretary, even though she had Teds private number. Her calls were the basis of the Arabs with boxcutters connection. But it has been shown she never made the call. Why would Ted Olson lie? Why would he lie on the day she died?

It seems like with low-quality cameras like the surveillance type we are dealing with here, that there could be some type of "image lag" which would cause the image of the plane to remain on the right while the explosion begins on the left. Sure enough, a quick search returned the following

nd no other passenger calls---and Olsons calls proven a lie--maybe

flight 77 never existed.

Quite a reach. 77 had a published list of passengers. Were they all fictitious?

It seems to me it would have been a LOT easier to simply crash 77 into the Pentagon...

Quite a reach. 77 had a published list of passengers. Were they all fictitious?

#15 | Posted by Zap

The obvious answer is that they're living in a compound underneath a mountain. Or the government murdered them all and hid the bodies.

But if there was a Flight 77 on Sept 10th then most likely there was a Flight 77 on Sept 11th at the same time and there was one scheduled for the same time on Sept 12th, thats how the flight number thing works.

The smell of batshit-crazy in here is over-whelming.
I see bani, BoOb, bonerboy,...

delusion about Pentagon lies?

'The Pentagon Papers' revisited for those who have forgotten:>)

en.wikipedia.org

#6 | Posted by Bani

yes, especially this post1

I agree with the author's analysis, but is this news to anyone?

#16-astro
go search for a FOIA that have been made and posted about the various hijacked plane's flight status. The results may surprise you.

Quite a reach. 77 had a published list of passengers. Were they all fictitious?

It seems to me it would have been a LOT easier to simply crash 77 into the Pentagon...

#15 | Posted by Zap at 2009-07-06 04:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

Not fictitious, but were they on that plane? Look at this list of passengers. Maybe some knew too much--maybe some wouldn't cooperate. According to the government, the passengers knew other planes had been hijacked and crashed--why wouldn't all these military make a stand? Why no phone calls from any of them? Can you address the Barbara Olson phone call?

Two Swedes - Sven and Ole - got a pilot to fly them to Canada to hunt moose. They bagged six.
As they started loading the plane for the return trip, the pilot said the plane could take only four moose.
Sven and Ole objected strongly, "Last year we shot six and the pilot let us put them all on board; he had the same type plane as yours."
Reluctantly, the pilot gave in and all six moose were loaded.
Even on full power, however, the little plane couldn't handle the load and went down a few moments after take-off.
Climbing out of the wreck Sven asked Ole, "Any idea where we are?"
"Yaaah ai tink vi are pretty close to vere vi crashed last yer.

So if we listen to Art Bell tonight we can get the "real" story about 9/11?

Diablo

The real story is the story you decide to accept. I would explain the Barbara Olson call before I made a final decision.

It seems like with low-quality cameras like the surveillance type we are dealing with here, that there could be some type of "image lag" which would cause the image of the plane to remain on the right while the explosion begins on the left. Sure enough, a quick search returned the following
Image lag is a phenomenon in which a residual image remains in the following frames after the light intensity suddenly changes.
books.google.com
#14 | Posted by JOE at 2009-07-06 04:06 PM

However, if you watch the helicopter footage the explosion does not coincide with the Pentagon "frames". Which means that they were not only edited sloppily, but the IRIG was methodically altered.

So if we listen to Art Bell tonight we can get the "real" story about 9/11?
#22 | Posted by Diablo at 2009-07-06 11:22 PM

Sadly, Coast2CoastAM pretty much toes the "official" line. They regularly have pro-Pentagon guests who confirm the "Arab terrorists" angle. So, to my knowledge they don't have any programs that question 9/11.

Eight years later still waiting for one of the thousands of people who would have to be involved in this conspiracy to come forward.......

Diablo - The sad part is that as someone who lives in NJ, I think this guy would be an improvement over what we have in office now. Give me a nut over a crook any day.

Eight years later still waiting for one of the thousands of people who would have to be involved in this conspiracy to come forward.......

#26 | Posted by sully at 2009-07-07 09:43 AM | Reply | Flag

It wouldn't have taken thousands. 6 people tops. Some of those involved wouldn't even have known they were doing anything wrong. Some of the weak links may have simply been killed---like Lee Harvey Oswald after his usefulness was over.

Sully

In addition---you wouldn't believe the guy anyway.

Here's one who claims to, Sully. I get a real laugh out of visiting this nut's website.

#27 | Posted by Diablo

whereas this former Hawaiian Republician has this website that has a field day asking obvious questions that never will have simple answers unless it is what it simply is ~ an another false flag operation that is ultimately run by Mossad, CIA & M15/16 this time around.

9/11: All In One Chunk
Michael Rivero

9/11 - The Basic Questions

just in:>)

#17 | Posted by 101Chairpoodle

He who smelt it delt it.

So, by allowing that we might not have all the facts and by asking logical questions that makes us crazy? No... crazy is believing anything Dick Cheney and Bush said without question for 8 LONG years.

BTW- I kinda like the name bonerboy. I wish I had thought of that.