"Let's use this same analysis with Hitler,"

HA~! HA~!

I think it's an unwritten rule that when someone starts a thread, they don't surrender by using the Hitler analogy until at least the 20th post. You managed to do it in your intro.

Loser!

Take a clue, Bozo. False flags have always been used. You act like you've discovered something dark and sinister. Off the top of my head I can think of false flags during the First Peloponnesian War (460 B.C.); biblical history goes much further back.

BTW, Bolton is correct. In 100 years nobody will care about Luxurious Club Gitmo nor the stupid pictures from Abu Graib (save a few historians).

Ask anybody you know about Andersonville or Rock Island during the Civil War and you will get a blank stare. The atrocities at both camps were horrific.

Nobody at Rock Island complained about having lemon chicken and rice pilaf two times in the same week.

#1 VERNON -
I appreciate the candor on false flags. Sounds like we're somewhat on the same page, though somehow I am a bozo and no, I don't believe I discovered anything. You and I might know it, but accepting the terrorism argument 'for a little freedom' is the line that the armies of stupified neo-cons are buying into hook line and sinker. Certainly you don't condone it to enslave us as the Patriot Act has done!!!

I thought the Hitler analogy was good so far as legacy is concerned. You didn't mention it, but it will soon be common knowledge that Abu Graib is only the tip of the iceberg in at least the last three administrations.... I know there are plenty more examples out there, though I didn't know of the two you mention.

I get the "bury it" logic of the 'wait until the 20th post to mention Hitler'. I'd rather get the word out to the illogical mindless out there.

Well as far as compairing to Hitler thats a little far man. I have yet to read or see any reports that we are rounding up and working to death or gassing our own citizens. Hitler & WW2 was 63 or so years ago while Civil War Was 150 or so years ago, And frankly taught very poorly in High School(at least it was at mine), so there is a bit of longer time for things to get "foggy". Sad but true.

This goes with the arguement some people put out there that the Treaty of Versailles was the reason for WWII.

Yes--it was tough on Germany--but that doesn't explain Italy and Japan who were winners in the Treaty.

Italy was facist a year before Hitler.

As for the Beck and Sheurer blather is that Beck was calling him on his comment(s) that we needed to be hit again for America to truly wake up and take care of this country.

Or that the gov't doesn't care about the American people.

Both comments have been said by quite a few people.

'fascist'

"Take a clue, Bozo."
#1 | Posted by vernon

Says TransPedo the Clown.

#6 -murphy
Beck was calling him on his comment(s) that we needed to be hit again

You imply Sheurer had made the comments previously? Otherwise, when did Beck call him on it?

The question Beck posed was 'is it possible that Congress will see the error of its ways'? Certainly you're not saying that this is 'calling him on it'

Or that the gov't doesn't care about the American people
Without the flamboyant statement, it wouldn't garner the huge publicity. How does it even logically correlate to the question or points 'attempting to be made'?

#5- Murphy
This goes with the arguement some people put out there that the Treaty of Versailles was the reason for WWII. Yes--it was tough on Germany--but that doesn't explain Italy and Japan who were winners in the Treaty. Italy was facist a year before Hitler

Which 'argument' are you referring to? Doesn't seem to relate to false flags or a legacy of dictator terror on your own population. please elaborate.

The plan was simple. Invite certain guests, ask certain questions that elicit nonsense, then soak in the ratings.

You just described Fox News' business plan in two sentences.

The plan was simple. Invite certain guests, ask certain questions that elicit nonsense

Sounds like your messiahs news conferences.

The sad thing is Hitler has been demonized as the most evil man ever, when in fact there have been men who have killed FAR more people than Hitler.

He was not the worst of the worst, a horrifically evil bastard, but not the most in numbers of murdered people.

So true, Sluggo. He probably was the worst of his time. History is still being written though. History may tell us it is not a single person, but obviously, that's immaterial.

I was a Glenn Beck fan before he went to Fox so I know this article is full of shit.

#15 - mystery

So the fact that he changed networks disproves his Media Whoredom? How do you explain his GQ crying stunt? You've gotta explain that one.

Beck's a whore, alright. Instead of faking orgasms, he fakes concern (with a little help from some genuine insanity).