Murphy: Then I guess 75% of the folks who post here on the DR are "separatists" with your logic.
Many many here are fed up and tired of the Dem and Repub party.
They are all crooks by most estimations.
So if she goes to campaign for a Libertarian--that makes her a "separatist"?
to your last sentence: no, she IS separatist, an extremist, a secessionist. they hate America both as it is not and what is stands for. of course it doers no matter to contributes to. the question is illogical as i6 doesn't what she does. my writing is about who and what they (the Palins and who they think are REAL Americans and what they think is REAL America.
also, to the rest of your comments, again, no:
you cited my post #182, where i quoted her without full context from my post #177, sorry that wasn't fair. here is the full context (from #177):
she said: it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: "Sit down and shut up", but that's the worthless, easy path; that's a quitter's way out. And a problem in our country today is apathy. It would be apathetic to just hunker down and "go with the flow".
And there is such a need to BUILD up and FIGHT for our state and our country. I choose to FIGHT for it! And I'll work hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government; strong national security for our country and support for our troops; energy independence; and for those who will protect freedom and equality and LIFE... I'll work for and campaign for those PROUD to be American, and those who are INSPIRED by our ideals and won't deride them.
I WILL support others who seek to serve, in or out of office, for the RIGHT reasons,....
I said, in part, (in #177):
like i said before, if she is not led or brainwashed by her husband... either way... they are, politically, dangerous kooks. uber nationalist, fascist. they try to come off as Libertarian leaning, but they are not, they would regulate, ban, prohibit every civil thing, and probably some fiscal ones too, that Libertarian would endorse.
like i said before, if she is not led or brainwashed by her husband... either way... they are, politically, dangerous kooks. uber nationalist, fascist. they try to come off as Libertarian leaning, but they are not, they would regulate, ban, prohibit every civil thing, and probably some fiscal ones too, that Libertarian would endorse.
no, i don't think most here are kooks like that. i was not implying anything about or inferring upon, by trying to pull a similarity or contrast to the Demopublicans or the Republicrats.
