Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, July 02, 2009

South Carolina first lady Jenny Sanford says she may be able to forgive her husband's much-publicized affair with an Argentine woman, but true reconciliation will take more time.

From e-mail she sent to reporters: "Forgiveness opens the door for Mark to begin to work privately, humbly and respectfully toward reconciliation with me," she said. "However, to achieve true reconciliation will take time, involve repentance, and will not be easy."

Mark Sanford's spokesman, Joel Sawyer, said the governor will travel Friday to be with his family in Florida, where his in-laws live.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Phoenix

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

He thought he would get some in South America. He will get some from his inlaws. Ouch!

Now our politics have started crossing over into reality television programming. Sanford & his church-a-lishous wife are the new Jon & Kate. What next? I suppose its just a matter of time before we hear rumors that one of the Kardashian girls has formed an exploratory committee for a possible 2012 presidential bid.

And we wonder why the world hates us.

From e-mail [his wife] sent to reporters: "Forgiveness opens the door for Mark to begin to work privately, humbly and respectfully toward reconciliation with me," she said. "However, to achieve true reconciliation... will not be easy."

In other words, Governor Sanford's wife plans on making his future a living hell for awhile.

If he wasn't such a big mouth, total idiot I might feel a wee bit sorry for him for what she's about to do to him. But I don't.

Every time you thought this fool had finally learned to shut-up, he opened his mouth again to the press about his Argentine mistress -- his soul mate -- or told about his other girlfriends and his wife kept adding another coal to the fire she plans on burning under his feet. lol

Sarah Palin is reportedly so jealous of all the media attention Sanford has been getting recently that she has been soliciting hookers to frame First Dude Whatshisname with a sex scandal so she can get her name back in the headlines.

If the sex scandal doesn't work, Second Daughter has been taken off birth control pills for plan B.


He thought he would get some in South America. He will get some from his inlaws. Ouch!

#1 | Posted by Diablo at 2009-07-03 12:08 AM |


No he won't.

The idiots will sit around talking to their invisible man in the sky, he'll say he's sorry and it'll all be good.


Yep. I'll bet within 3 months, Mrs. Sanford and her ugly face will show up on the religious circuit talking about how satan ruined her marriage and how jesus is giving her piece of mind.

But she won't say a fucking word about why she is such a lousy and undesirable wife who can't keep her man at home.

I suppose jesus has no power to make her face attractive or her sex desirable.

Gov. Sanford explicitly lied to his constituents when he told his aides he was going hiking. Why doesn't the right call for his resignation. Billy Boy Clinton lied, granted under oath, but all of the folks on the right point to lying and the affair as reasons Billy should have been impeached. I smell a double standard here, no?

The whole family will get together and pray to the Lord that He will stop gay marriage before it breaks up more perfect marriages.

I thought he found his "soul mate". Why would he waste anymore of what little time he has left on his current dim-witted wife?

Shit sandwiches and humble pie to be served the Good Governor for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

Hell hath no fury ...

Perhaps his soul mate kicked him to the curb?


Soulmate = someone who understands my genitals.

Soulmate = someone who understands my genitals.
#12 | Posted by Lipzoidial

okay, I drew a ven diagram to understand your statement.

I believe you may want to rethink that because the group that truly understands your genitals is...

... well, I don't want to upset you or anything.

I knew there was something up the day you asked me how I felt about blowjobs.

If she gives him another chance he'll be one lucky SOB cause she's fine looking and has deep pockets.

If she doesn't I wonder how she'd feel about a romantic sterno lit roadkill dinner with yours truly?

LOL Gimme!

Seriously, this is a woman whose love is amazing. An affair is not easy to forgive. It takes a lot of time to rebuild trust.

I wish her well.

If she doesn't I wonder how she'd feel about a romantic sterno lit roadkill dinner with yours truly?

#14 | Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch at 2009-07-03 11:35 PM


You're consistent, Gimme, I'll say that much. lol!

She'd be better off with you than that idiot she married, that's for sure.

And what woman could resist a "fried critter by candlelight" roadkill dinner.

"The idiots will sit around talking to their invisible man in the sky, he'll say he's sorry and it'll all be good."

I got the same Guy in the sky, Jerry. But I don't believe this is "invisible." As a Catholic Thomist (in most ways), I believe God is being itself. Being is so obvious invisibility does not come into the equation.
But suit yourself. I respect your view even if you can not conjure up an iota of respect for anyone who disagrees with you. I guess you are god?
Just try a little intellectual experiment. Really, it is not a trick. Don't do the Zen thing of meditating on nothingness as if to clear one's mind achieves such a thing. Be rational and try to comprehend "nothing," as in no thing. You quickly realize it does not...By it's own definition!...exist. It can not be. There can be what is and nothing else and that means a greater theater of existence, above it all and totally containing all, MUST be.


There can be what is and nothing else and that means a greater theater of existence, above it all and totally containing all, MUST be.

#17 | Posted by Diablo


What about if you just think this is true but it's really not?

So you get;

'what is' = what is not.

'nothing else' = something else

'above it all and totally containing all, MUST be' = a totally fucked up statement whether you believe it or not.

"I believe God is being itself."


The more you know, the less you believe.

"What about if you just think this is true but it's really not?
So you get;
'what is' = what is not.
'nothing else' = something else"

Lipzoidal, you get a breakdown of reasoning, because "what is" being "what is not" is a logical contradiction. And remember my comment about "nothing?" By its own definition it can not exist, so if you use the term as if it were something that exists, the same logical contradiction arises.
My point is that all being must be "contained" for lack of a better word under one all-encompassing being. It can not have a border with "nothing" outside because nothing does not exist by its own definition.
That being must be infinite.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable