Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, July 01, 2009

"The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States." -- former CIA counterterrorism expert Michael Scheuer on Glenn Beck's Fox News show last night

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

frankf55

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I'm sure Glennnn was touching himself for the entire segment.

That man needs to be committed.

Michael Scheuer: "The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States."

The only chance we have as a county?
Say what??

How can anybody really take this seriously?

How can anybody really take this seriously?

#3 | Posted by TheTom

Too bad Ish Kabibble checked out for the afternoon or he'd show you.

"The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States."

Sadly, this is exactly what the Bush Adminstration thought in 2001.

The only chance we have as a county?
Say what??


How can anybody really take this seriously?

#3 | Posted by TheTom

Answers:

GLEN BECK
FOX NEWS

Trust me. The idiots that watch take it very, VERY seriously.

As if it were NEWS or something. Where would they ever get that idea?

Was Glends crying?
Is Michael really aflac?
Said it before- the right simply hates America.

As a Glenn Beck viewer, I can say he does frolic in the controversial. I don't know what Glenn really thinks about this, but he loves the publicity it brings. What is so ironic about this is that this thinking was the ne-con rallying call back in 1999 in Dick Cheney's controversial 'Rebuilding America's Defenses' where he stated "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event like a
new Pearl Harbor". The commentator was in the CIA for Reagan, Clinton and Bush, so he would be very aware of all this. I have to wonder if his agenda is a repeat to Cheney's endgame as a pretext to war!

"but he loves the publicity it brings"

Media whore. That's the term you're searching for.

Glenn Beck is a former alcoholic and cocaine addict who's moved on to a new addiction: attention, money, and fame. Who knows how many holes the drugs burned in his brain? Judging by what he presents on TV, he might just be batshit crazy - unless he is just acting, in which case he's a manipulative sociopath.

So, he grandstands and ululates, sobs live on TV, engages in hyperbole, and generally tugs at emotional strings as often as possible. "9/12 Project", anyone? Even other anchors at Fox were making fun of him, live! LOL!

I'm not surprised someone on his show said something like this. It was only a matter of time. I'm just shocked at how badly the conservatives pine for another catastrophic attack --- anything to get that power fix, I guess.

I have to assume Beck broke down in tears once he heard this?

Very nice. So we need another terrorist attack for America to "wake up."

Sounds like Mr. Scheuer and Mr. Beck have adopted Ben Tre logic: "It became necessary to destroy the village in order to save it."

Guys, Glenn didn't mouth these words, so take a breath and look at the real issues here.

For all you who have never watched Glenn Beck and are just jumping on the bandwagon or simply partisans, you need to step back until you actually watch or listen to him. Glenn is a bit of a wildcard, but the best that the FauxNews Channel has to offer. Glenn does take head on many of the newsworthy issues that the other rag Networks purposely overlook. One of the latest is the Acorn tangled web.

Some of you may be confused. I call the network FauxNews because I do strongly believe they are misleading millions every day. They have profited greatly in the change in power from right (hardly) to very left. But they also do not touch many stories that might not be favorable to the neo-con base. When they slam the left, it is mostly as hype, ranting and raving. Each of these anchors are smart enough to know what is really going on (that the largest issues are not left/right), but they only take a superficial view for purpose of ratings. We all recall that their corporate lawyers won a battle in court to be allowed to mislead and lie!

So let's have a debate on what is the purpose of the commentator? Is it that America will only wake up with an attack OR America won't be able to take this country back without GIVING THEIR CONSENT for another terrorist attack? Is the strategy to overwhelm the system, crash the economic system then grab more power that the sheople will allow for the government to fix it? The theory was written back in the 60's called The Cloward-Piven Strategy.

" The theory was written back in the 60's called The Cloward-Piven Strategy."

What a load. The "American Thinker" is for American dopes.

For all you who have never watched Glenn Beck and are just jumping on the bandwagon or simply partisans

A glenn Beck viewer using the word 'partisan'!!!!!

Now that's some funny shit right there.

Oh, and Ha Ha!!! You watch Fox News!!!! Ha Ha!!!

"As a Glenn Beck viewer, I can say he does frolic in the controversial."

And delves in the moronic

"Guys, Glenn didn't mouth these words, so take a breath and look at the real issues here."

No, but this imbecile DID mouth this:

"Why did we buy Alaska in the 1950s? We bought Alaska for the resources. And now we say no!"

So coupling his Media Whoreness with unparalleled ignorance to our countries own history makes this guy, and the people who listen to him, incredibly dangerous!

nullifdan,

get real dan. The American thinker didn't create the theory. the correlation is undeniable, no matter what website reported on it. Can't you reply with integrity?

frank,
we meet again. Yes, a Glenn Beck watcher and non-partisan. I take strong stands against both. Which partisan are you? I only asked we address the real issues. It is completely irrelevant if Glenn Beck is involved or not!

Glenn is a bit of a wildcard, but the best that the FauxNews Channel has to offer.

says a lot about Faux News doesn't it?


All I needed to know was that

Rupert Murdock, successfully argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves....

www.ceasespin.org

since they can I assume they are ALLOWED to do this then I also assume they ALL are doing it now.

So it is "Caveat Emptor" when it comes to any of the networks. The ruling applies to all not just Fox News who were the ones brave enough (or stupid enough) to champion the cause of Deliberately Lying to the public to distort the news.

Donner, I am shocked.

On February 14, a Florida Appeals court ruled there is absolutely nothing illegal about lying, concealing or distorting information by a major press organization. The court reversed the $425,000 jury verdict in favor of journalist Jane Akre who charged she was pressured by Fox Television management and lawyers to air what she knew and documented to be false information. The ruling basically declares it is technically not against any law, rule, or regulation to deliberately lie or distort the news on a television broadcast.

Disgusting!

frank.

do you even know what the cloward-piven strategy? have you bothered to make yourself familiar with Cheney's document? Talk about dangerous! Or do you just like to take the easy way out, type on your keyboard and out anyone that you don't understand what they're about?

"do you even know what the cloward-piven strategy?"

Yeah, it's another rtard bogeyman.

"do you even know what the cloward-piven strategy?"

The love child of Jeremy Piven and Ron Howard dressed as a clown?

Yes this is batshit crazy but I'll bet we all can name at least a half dozen posters here who would sacrifice American lives if they could undo the will of the people in the last election.

Wanna guess who?

Aw, c'mon, it will be fun.

FWthom comes to mind. Prolly Aflakababble.

Joe

Perhaps Goat, Chickenbrancher comes to mind, but why would we speculate?

Cause it is fun and what else do we have to do?

Cant wait for all the outrage.

I don't know what Glenn really thinks about this, but he loves the publicity it brings.

Well there are people that use talent and knowledge to craft an identity that viewers will want to watch and interact with.

Then their are shitstains like this and Rush and mAnn Coulter that give airtime to perverted ideas such as this.

#20. what an intelligent response. obviously you have no ability to intelligently say how it is flawed OR the unmistakable correlation to Saul Alinsky as Obama's teacher.

Glenn is interesting.. little out there, but funny and interesting..

However, in this particular story.. the headline suggest a different conversation than what actually took place.

The point was (and this is a Glenn Beck rallying cry that he pounds constantly), people have gotten complacent because we haven't been attacked again since 9/11.

That's a valid point.. even some dems make that point.. so, its wrong because Beck makes it on (liberals prepare to shudder) Fox News?

And IF another attack happens during the reign of the Holy One, it WILL be blamed on Obama by Americans.. like or not.. that's what will happen.

So what's wrong with his point?

"The point was (and this is a Glenn Beck rallying cry that he pounds constantly), people have gotten complacent because we haven't been attacked again since 9/11."

Complacent or just not propagandized into fearful acceptance of whatever the right would like them to believe or do.
The neocons depended on fear for power, if there is less fear they know they will have less power.

Danni, I'm mostly with you, but this "fear" is no longer a partisan division. The fear -- and absolute arrogance and power-grabbing enslavement mentality is very much happening now.

They should have aired this on ABC,CBS,NBC,MSNBC, or CNN then this whole story would be irrelevant because NOBODY watches those channels for news anyway. For example the only place to learn about the largest TAX INCREASE in history CAP and TRADE is on FOX NEWS the other network news channels are still covering Michal Jackson, and he is still dead again today some news coverage...




The top ten programs for Q1 are listed below incidentally, the same order held for March 2009.


Top 10 Cable News Programs, Q1 2009 (by total viewers)
1. The O'Reilly Factor: 3,438,000 total viewers
2. Hannity: 2,579,000 total viewers
3. Glenn Beck: 2,271,000 total viewers
4. Special Report with Bret Baier: 2,092,000 total viewers
5. On the Record with Greta Van Susteren: 1,977,000 total viewers
6. The FOX Report with Shepard Smith: 1,927,000 total viewers
7. The O'Reilly Factor (repeat): 1,457,000 total viewers
8. America's Newsroom: 1,445,000 total viewers
9. Your World with Neil Cavuto: 1,428,000 total viewers
10. Countdown with Keith Olbermann: 1,327,000 total viewers

#25. I would have to differ with you. I was watching the show as well and concur that the headline is accurate for the point the guest was trying to make. So, to me what needs to be debated is what he really meant by that.

Is it that America will only wake up with an attack OR America won't be able to take this country back without GIVING THEIR CONSENT for another terrorist attack?

Is the current strategy to overwhelm the system, crash the economic system then grab more power that the sheople will allow for the government to fix it?

Perhaps Goat, Chickenbrancher comes to mind, but why would we speculate?

My question exactly. I guess the answer is that is what ignorant people do -- make rash, unfounded speculations.

Cant wait for all the outrage.

Outrage? From something you (OWS) said? LOL. Don't flatter yourself. You are about 60 IQ points away from having the ability to say something that would outrage me. Even then, you'd have to catch me on an off day. I've had about three of those in my life.

Oh Goat you are so smart and cool. I wish I could be cool and smart like you.

So wanna tell us what you think about the substance of the thread or just wanna wow us with your oh so carefully chosen words Mr. Smartest Oil Rigg monkey in the world?

"Is it that America will only wake up with an attack OR America won't be able to take this country back without GIVING THEIR CONSENT for another terrorist attack?"

Wake up and do what??? And, just for the record, America did take this country back, the legal way back in November.

So wanna tell us what you think about the substance of the thread or just wanna wow us with your oh so carefully chosen words Mr. Smartest Oil
Rigg
(sic) monkey in the world?

Not really. This thread doesn't interest me

Since we clearly have not been attacked by another nation since 12/7/41, what this Fox guest is really saying is that we need to stage another diversion like killing 3000 in a skyscraper to justify continuing "Patriot Act" abuses and an ugly war claiming a thousand American lives a year for Big Oil. herm

For me, the defining Beck moment was that weird breakdown he suffered after some kind of hospital procedure:

www.monstersandcritics.com

"The top ten programs for Q1 are listed below incidentally, the same order held for March 2009."


Wow!

So if we use your logic that "viewers/listeners" equates to being Right ----- then Howard Stern is the Best Source on How to Relate to a Woman and SpongeBob on Career Planning!

Amazing!


I Guess rubber necking a Car wreck should be added to college curriculum


That man needs to be committed.

#2 | Posted by ZombieHunter

Glenn Beck is known for outrageous comments. He doesn't represent the Conservatives in this country.

He certainly does entertain the Conservatives in this country however.

For me, the defining Beck moment was that weird breakdown he suffered after some kind of hospital procedure:

Yeah, I laughed my ass off at that too. For a moment I thought he was going to die.

Too fucking funny.

The top ten programs for Q1 are listed below...

#29 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Does "flock mentality" mean anything to you?

www.zmescience.com

It would appear from your post that the flock follows Faux News.

"Top 10 Cable News Programs"

That's like saying Top Ten Batters in AAA Baseball.

Top 10 Cable News Programs, Q1 2009 (by total viewers)
1. The O'Reilly Factor: 3,438,000 total viewers
2. Hannity: 2,579,000 total viewers
3. Glenn Beck: 2,271,000 total viewers
4. Special Report with Bret Baier: 2,092,000 total viewers
5. On the Record with Greta Van Susteren: 1,977,000 total viewers
6. The FOX Report with Shepard Smith: 1,927,000 total viewers
7. The O'Reilly Factor (repeat): 1,457,000 total viewers
8. America's Newsroom: 1,445,000 total viewers
9. Your World with Neil Cavuto: 1,428,000 total viewers
10. Countdown with Keith Olbermann: 1,327,000 total viewers

#29 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Besides proving that Fox Viewers are mindless sheep who are GLUED to their TVs every night, what are you trying to say?

NBC Nightly News won the week averaging 8.4 million Total Viewers
and topping 10 million on Thursday night with the Jackson news.

Your Fox News numbers are but a fraction of this one News Program.

Meanwhile our President's chief of staff has said,

"Never let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things you couldn't do before."

This guy Rohmboi actually works for the Government, not a News Co.

I think his point was that if we don't take things seriously now - and that would only come after some kind of attack - and wait around complacent for another 10-20 years, next time we're hit, we might stay down.

Stupid comment? yes. Crazy notion? only time will tell us whether he's right. I don't think you can take this as a desire from him that we are attacked. I don't think any American wishes that we are attacked.

"I don't think any American wishes that we are attacked..."

Wish I could agree with that, good buddy.

"I don't think any American wishes that we are attacked..."

Dick Cheney does. All Neo-Cons do.

Any American who truly wishes that we are attacked - for whatever reason - is not an American, and is guilty of treason.


I think his point was that if we don't take things seriously now - and that would only come after some kind of attack - and wait around complacent for another 10-20 years, next time we're hit, we might stay down.

#45 | Posted by somoco at 2009-07-01 06:52 PM | Reply | Flag

He said that our ONLY HOPE was an attack. That means that he thinks without an attack America is doomed.

This is a sick man and he should be hospitalized. Anyone who thinks he makes sense should be in adjoining rooms.

Your comment as almost as ignorant as his. Going into a wartime state of emergency is no way to live life. You seem to be living your life in fear. Fear like that gave us Bush. Fear like that made us a nation of pants pissers. Grow some balls, and try to act like a man.

Stupid comment? yes. Crazy notion? only time will tell us whether he's right.

#45 | Posted by somoco

Wow! First of all, it wasn't a stupid comment. It was an unpopular and evil comment, but it was accurate. Nothing stimulates an economy like a good kill fest.

Second, you are doing what everyone else is doing. No, no, no, no, don't tell me, I simply cannot believe it.

Let me give you a new concept. It's called 'our gov't paying radicals to attack us'. Almost every war we have ever been in was started this way. The latest examples being Iraq and afganistan.

He doesn't represent the Conservatives in this country.

#39 | Posted by Eddie at 2009-07-01 06:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

Of course he represents conservatives. That's why he has air time. So does Rush---they both spout HATE AMERICA speech. Just your type.

BS BB. I don't live in fear, and certainly hope we are not attacked.

But, I also think the best defense is to be very well prepared. That means intelligence on the ground, and military might.

If you think that we could coast on national defense, as some believe we are in the process of doing, and not be a target of a strong China/Russia or some other global power in the decades to come, then you're kidding yourself and need to read some history books.


Fear like that gave us Bush. Fear like that made us a nation of pants pissers. Grow some balls, and try to act like a man.

#49 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

newsworthy.

Let me give you a new concept. It's called 'our gov't paying radicals to attack us'. Almost every war we have ever been in was started this way. The latest examples being Iraq and afganistan.
#50 | POSTED BY LIPZOIDIAL AT 2009-07-01 07:07 PM | REPLY | FLAG

Please link to credible evidence that we paid for 9/11, and the subsequent cover-up

But, I also think the best defense is to be very well prepared. That means intelligence on the ground, and military might.

So you are saying that our military was not mighty enough to stop OBL?

Or would you agree that our military might caused the attack?

Failure of ground intelligence.


Failure of ground intelligence.

#56 | Posted by somoco


"Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.,"

Care to take another stab at it? You aren't even close.

Care to take another stab at it? You aren't even close.

#57 | POSTED BY MANYPATHS AT 2009-07-01 07:29 PM | REPLY | FLAG: Believes Chickens Have Come Home To Roost

We should all have our guns in the loaded ready position in our homes, never know who is going to breakin and steal all our valuables.

Whats up Goatman you fucking Asshole???

If you read the article, you will know.

These are your people my man,

As far as I know, I am not related to Michael Scheuer or Glenn Beck, so I'll have to respectfully disagree with you there, celey, unless you can produce verifiable genealogy charts that indicate otherwise.

My suggestion on the meds on the other thread? It is more important than ever, love

"Please link to credible evidence that we paid for 9/11"


Funny thing about this comment ----- is that about this time in Bush's First Term he Was Handing a 40 Million Dollar Check over to the Taliban!


Go ahead ----- Google it!

What we really need is another Katrina. That way the dems can show us how nobody dies and everyone gains weight on their watch. In spite of hurricanes.

Oh, and Ha Ha!!! You watch Fox News!!!! Ha Ha!!!

#15 | Posted by Manypaths

What do you watch? The comedy channel?

Why, I'll bet Obama can even figure out a way that nobody will lose their cable for even a split second.

I have that much faith in him.

He's simply amazing.

When's Obama gonna raise Christopher Reeves?

Where's Michael J. Fox been?

I bought 2 packs of Marlboro mediums today for 3.80 a pack.

I wonder what Obama pays for his.

How's Ted Kennedy doing?

I mean really. Just shows how un-important those jobs really are.

Anyone else got a job where they can be gone for months on end and not be replaced?

REMEMBER! As far as Rethuglicans are concerned, it's: Party And Profit Over Country.

Everytime.
Without Fail.

As far as I'm concerned they're all traitors.

Everytime.
Without Fail

Nothing screams ignorance like painting with a broad brush.

#6 | POSTED BY MANYPATHS
"Trust me. The idiots that watch take it very, VERY seriously.
As if it were NEWS or something. Where would they ever get that idea?"

I hear ya, but frankly, it eludes me. I'm to the right of almost everyone I know, and I'm sure I've watched more Fox than almost everyone I know. But I've never been unable to see it for what it is.

I recall seeing Beck on Headline News before he went to Fox. Sure, he was effusive and a bit too earnest, but almost any time I've seen him since on Fox, my jaw drops. He was quirky before, but now he's just way the hell out there, and he seems to enjoy it.

Granted, HE didn't say "our only hope", and having watched the interview, it wasn't just a couple of whack-jobs talking. Thing is, these commentators and pundits, on both sides of the spectrum, love to nit-pick everything someone else says, and mine each and every statement for vulnerability. How Beck let that ball sail right by him is a mystery. It reminds me of Olbermann letting Garafalo's "racist teabaggers" comment sail right by him.

How do you reasonably ignore such a statement?

I'm trying to unwrap the obscenity of this logic. The only hope of the United States, if we're going to be kept safe from a devastating terror attack, is for a devastating terror attack to occur.

That's Doctor Strangelove politics at their most perfectly insane.

For years we heard from the Democratic leadership that we were in a "quagmire" that we could never win in Iraq, and that the war was already lost. And you get all worked up over some hypothetical scenario mentioned by some talk show guest? Sheesh.

The truth is that the country is for the most part swooning in their love over the idea of what Obama represents. On the contrary, the "Obama haters" (sans the kooks) have known all along that this phony is doing more and more harm to this country every day. There is nothing more hated in American culture than an out-of-date fad, and here's hoping that the Obama fad will be out of fashion very soon. It's just a matter of time.

I'm trying to unwrap the obscenity of this logic. The only hope of the United States, if we're going to be kept safe from a devastating terror attack, is for a devastating terror attack to occur.

----------

We must destroy the village in order to save it.

...and here's hoping that the Obama fad will be out of fashion very soon. It's just a matter of time.

#73 | Posted by Dinsey

'bout 7 1/2 more years.

Republicans support terrorism if it means they will regain power. How typical of those assholes.

Anyone else got a job where they can be gone for months on end and not be replaced?

#68 | Posted by Washboard at 2009-07-01 08:24 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

yeah, W. and 9-11 to boot.

clown.

On the contrary, the "Obama haters" (sans the kooks) have known all along that this phony is doing more and more harm to this country every day. There is nothing more hated in American culture than an out-of-date fad, and here's hoping that the Obama fad will be out of fashion very soon.

You sound like I sounded in the early '80s when talking about Ronald Reagan. America never got around to my view that he was a smooth-talking dunce whose only skill was to deliver a speech.

America never got around to my view that he was a smooth-talking dunce whose only skill was to deliver a speech

I still say GHWB was President from 1980-1992 with Reagan being Madame and Bush being Wayland Flowers.

Neo-con blah blah blah Glen Beck blah blah blah blah, Neo-con blah blah blah blah, right wing blah blah neocon blah blah blah blah, extremist idiots blah blah blah Neocon blah blah blah Neocon blah blah FOX Neocons blah blah blah blah, Glen Beck alcoholic blah blah blah blah Neocon blah blah blah Cocaine user bla blah blah Neocon blah blah blah blah blah blah blah!

Such profound Libtard intelligence on display!

Blah blah blah blah Neocon blah blah blah!




I enjoyed watching that. I really liked how Glenn Beck didn't attack the guy but calmly talked to him after he made these ridiculous statements. That should help take the wind of Glen 'Douche Nozzle' Beck's sails next time he whines about something 'Un-American' said by someone who doesn't have an R after their name.

I especailly enjoyed when the turd said "now we have Harvard & Yale types in power and they don't care".

What did he mean now? Has this man been paying attention the last 75 years? Most Presidents have had an Ivy league education and having an education should not be a bad thing for a president in my opinion.

I'm trying to unwrap the obscenity of this logic.

Wake up Cadenhead and read/watch something other than your current liberal media outlets.

Michael Scheuer was making the point about America being taken over by liberals/progressives in congress. IE: Out of freaking control spending, Cap & Trade, global warming hoaxes, New Gun Regulations, Lax Terrorism tactics, etc...


The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States.

I'm not so sure THAT would wake any of you people up to the shit that is going on RIGHT now. How many pages of bills that drastically affect the country, have been passed in the last 7 months that NO ONE has even fucking read? 8,000, last time I counted

God blah blah blah Jesus blah blah blah blah, Sodomy blah blah blah blah, Obedience blah blah liberal blah blah blah blah, extremist Christians blah blah blah Iraq blah blah blah Crusade blah blah ACORN liberals blah blah blah blah, Jesus H. Fucking Christ blah blah blah blah Holy blah blah blah Praise Him bla blah blah FEAR blah blah blah blah blah blah blah!

Such anachronistic apocalyptic bible beating dullardry on display!

Blah blah blah blah Jesus blah blah blah!


FTFY...

Michael Scheuer was making the point about America being taken over by liberals/progressives in congress. IE: Out of freaking control spending, Cap & Trade, global warming hoaxes, New Gun Regulations, Lax Terrorism tactics, etc...

---------

After 8 years of bush spending and subsequent bank crash only an complete fucking imbecile would make this comment.

Shawn - I'm not saying Bush is innocent either. Wake up man. You think Chimpy II is any better?

Obama wants to tax you for the energy you use because of the false belief that Global Warming is a threat to the world. Man has NEVER been a threat to the world, except for nuclear weapons.

Greenland use to be GREEN! Now it is covered with ice. Who is to say what the NORMAL temprature of the earth should be? We don't even know. But Al fucking gore stands to make millions if we say it is too warm.

Did you know he owns a carbon cap and trade company? Poised to make billions if this bullshit law is passed?

Wake the hell up Shawn!

#83 | Posted by Zarathustra at

Nice of you to add ALL you know to the conversation.

"That's Doctor Strangelove politics at their most perfectly insane."

Good definition of Fox News, rcade

Republicans love death. They just can't seem to get enough of it. If a terrorist attack happens you guys think it might not be a blue state next time? Probably not. You all want libs dead so bad you don't even think about it.

Not at all Jackass. I just want you to use your head. It's not about left and right. That is what they want us to fight about. Come on. You are smarter than that.

Obama wants to tax you for the energy you use because of the false belief that Global Warming is a threat to the world. Man has NEVER been a threat to the world, except for nuclear weapons.

-----------

Here ya go imbecile.

www.markfiore.com

Good news! Since it a video, you won't even have to read it.

Michael Scheuer was making the point about America being taken over by liberals/progressives in congress.

#82 | Posted by Beachbuzz at 2009-07-01 11:01 PM | Reply | Flag:


This guy in the video mentioned something about 'ow we have these Harvard & Yale types in power' (paraphrasing) as if only Democtratic presidents attend these places.

Considering history, don't you think that's a little odd on his part?

Obama wants to tax you for the energy you use because of the false belief that Global Warming is a threat to the world. Man has NEVER been a threat to the world, except for nuclear weapons.


#85 | Posted by Beachbuzz at 2009-07-01 11:17 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nukes are the only threat to the world?

NOTHING is a threat to the World (Earth). The Earth itself will shake us off and keep on chugging. Instead, it's mankind that is threatened. I believe that's what you meant, but I wanted to be sure before I started.

Have you ever seen a river catch fire due to the pollutants in contains? A river! A constantly moving body of water that is so polluted it can't flush itself clean and actually catches fire.

What about water tables that supply drinking water being depleted and or contaminated due to the dumping of chemicals?

How abut Mexico City where your eyes water as soon as you exit the airplane due to the ridiculously high levels of carbon monoxide?

These are threats that are currently taking a toll on human lives everyday.

The context of this is way overblown.


Michael Scheuer was the darling of the left after 9/11.

He is still very critical of the elites running the country and not protecting Americans.

He is not the first to say to get the attention of the gov't we are-- or we would have to be attacked again.

Close the borders--do more from the ports--stop the illegals and send away the overstayed visas.

The idiots running the country appear not to care.

That was the point of the segment.

And Beck said like three times--"That is a huge charge to make about our gov't"! (That they don't care).


Michael Scheuer is in no way wishing or hoping for another attack on our country.

And he's a Democrat. Started under Clinton and stayed under Bush.

Fuck you Shawn!


Can't speak for TV heads, Commonsense. I did agree with his previous comment about America waking the hell up.

How about you? You think Obama is spending like a drunken sailor with NO DAMN results?

#93 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-07-01 11:55 PM | Reply |

I agree 100%. Well said Murphy.

What scares me though Murphy, is that no one else will listen.

Michael Scheuer is a modern day Paul Revere.

Michael Scheuer is in no way wishing or hoping for another attack on our country.

That's exactly what he just did. When you say that something is "our only hope," you are hoping for it to happen. You think it needs to happen.

Michael Scheuer is in no way wishing or hoping for another attack on our country.


That's exactly what he just did. When you say that something is "our only hope," you are hoping for it to happen. You think it needs to happen.

#98 | Posted by rcade at 2009-07-02 12:42

I'm tired of defending.

So what if he did say it. What are you doing different?

Hey Rcade, You can throw in any flavor of bullshit that you desire, and it will still be bullshit.

I'm only asking that you shed your jaded palate, and reason for a moment.

If not, then so beit...I'm not out much, neither are you.

Is another attack by Islamics inevitable?

We needed a leader with Hussein's (the Iranian not the U.S. guy) or Stalin's intelligence and comprehension of what makes Islamics act the way they do, and the will to respond without restraint so as to discourage Islamic aggression against the civilized world. But so long as we exhibit weakness, it invites attack. Negative attracts positive. Weakness attracts strength. The Islamics are strong. They have convictions and the courage of their convictions.

We have an Obama who sympathizes with Islamic theocratic tyrants and says that he will deal with them before a scheduled election, showing submission to bullying thugs.

Bush was reluctant to use necessary force to provide guidelines for impressional Islamics, who were confronted only by an amorphous rather than a crystalline American entity. Instead of establishing our supremacy, we acted like "therapists" who let the Iraqis "express themselves" through rioting and looting of places such as the museum. After all, they had been under a yoke and so needed the experience of freedom (or was it anarchy and chaos).

We allowed al-Sadr to defy us without razing his territory, and destroying his source of support, and killing al-Sadr. We were wishy-washy and unassertive. We allowed Sunni dominated cities to defy us also. We unnecessarily prolonged opposition to our forces, and we did not fully accomplish geopolitical objectives, including control over their oil resource, the presence in perpetuity of large American military bases in the region, and continued control over Iraqi sovereignty.

Oh well. Tell me not what might have been.

We now have in the White House in Obama, if it be possible, a bigger nincompoop than Carter, the one who enabled the Ayatollahs to seize control and dethrone the "bad" Shah, who evoked the opposition of the theocrats as he worked to reduce their power and provide a secular education to the population.

Obama is permitting the Iranians to develop nuclear weapons and these theocrats are waiting for their imam to climb out of the sewer and lead them to domination of the world. The inevitable consequence of Obama's actions is that nuclear weapons are used against the U.S., either through distribution to the terrorist network maintained by Iran, or by Iran itself boldly since they worship Thanatos and welcome death. Obama is entering the halls of infamy and is the incarnation of evil. Because of Obama's positions, millions of people will die unnecessarily. Obama will join Stalin, Mao, and Hitler as mass murderers of history. Obama's mental illness does not excuse him. But then again, the American people elected him, misled as they have been by a complicit media, and unresponsive to the Republican selection of a weak and unassertive candidate who was unwilling to call Obama out on his many faults.

Is Obama an Islamosymp, a commiesymp, or both? He certainly has demoncstrated that he loves lefties and Islamics, and hates America, and is willing to subordiante America's interests to those of leftist dictators and Islamic theocratic dictators.

Any American who truly wishes that we are attacked - for whatever reason - is not an American, and is guilty of treason.

#48 | POSTED BY SOMOCO

People in this country who wish America to be attacked are (very simply) enemies of America.

Hey Johnson, check out my (went to look it up but Rcade deleated it) Obama thread.

Try this one.

Obama a Narcissist?

Are you avoiding me BB?

www.youtube.com

I literally takes 2 seconds for a youtube video to load with my new verizon internet.

People in this country who wish America to be attacked are (very simply) enemies of America.

Context is everything Sluggo. Listen to the entire comment before you decide.

Are you avoiding me BB?

No.


You know I love you man!

I might be avoiding the CellDweller!

People in this country who wish America to be attacked are (very simply) enemies of America.


99% of republicans are then. Ron Paul, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins may be the only exceptions.

www.youtube.com

For you bro...miss you!

Lucky you caught me...I was headed for the cellar.

Israel Kamakawiwo'Ole Over The Rainbow

www.youtube.com

www.youtube.com

You are the Techno Queen....haha

I'm diggin these dudes...you turned me on too

SoundofMadness

www.youtube.com

Soulidium - Into The Light

When you gonna wake up and fight....!!!


Buzzz is out of here. Later Rex and ja.

"I just saw Halleys Commet....."

I'm ready to fight right now now brother....

Stay up and watch......

www.youtube.com

Sound of Maddness

"When you gonna wake up and fight....!!!"

part of the song...Rexy. You know the rest.


I'm gonna tear this mother fucker down bro.

LOL......easy cowboy

Where you suspended?

www.youtube.com

TRIVIUM - DOWN FROM THE SKY

I hate these fuckers too....

What can we do?

Suspended? never..

www.youtube.com

Make some bombs and kill a bunch of libs?

Not much of a plan if you ask me.

We are better off pissing off the masses and making them defend/rethink themselves everyday. "Hey how you doing? Still think Obama is the answer? Why or why not?"

I thought you were suspended for some reason.

Hearsay...should have known better.

"painted your room at midnight...."

www.youtube.com

Buckethead - Padmasana

Lib bombs hell....Rex can squash them just by looking at them!

Feels like pumpkin mess!

If you think that we could coast on national defense, as some believe we are in the process of doing, and not be a target of a strong China/Russia or some other global power in the decades to come, then you're kidding yourself and need to read some history books.

#52 | Posted by somoco at 2009-07-01 07:14 PM | Reply | Flag

Why are we a target, and say--Canada--isn't? Why isn't France or Spain a target? How about Italy? Why just us? We spend more on the military than Russia and China combined because of the millions of paranoid pants pissers like yourself who think some Chinese guy wants to steal your refrigerator. I've read several history books, and haven't seen one that says Russia or China ever attacked us. Maybe you should read a book on how to make a point.

Maybe if we spent some of that military money on education, we wouldn't have a 40% drop out rate, and a job shift to India because they are the ones who's kids can read a book.

3:00am Last call!

Buzz is out of here!

Later man...

One last song brother.....

www.youtube.com

It's a good one

Where do you kids get this music?

www.youtube.com

And another......

www.youtube.com

Wreath of Barbs

www.youtube.com

cut.rate.box - aperture

Fuck you Shawn!

-----------

No thanks. I've prefer real women to dickless pricks such as yourself.

www.youtube.com

Mushroomhead - Solitaire Unraveling

Music,kids


www.youtube.com

Sassy monkey

www.youtube.com

www.youtube.com

Soilwerk - Exile

www.youtube.com

Psy Trance

real women to dickless pricks

Fraid to ask, but what's the difference

www.youtube.com

Soulidium - Trapped

Well I guess we're all wrapping it up early tonight ,so I have to say to half of you "fuck you you ignorant morons" and the rest " you're absolutely right"

see you soon

...dickless pricks...

Seems to me the two would be mutually exclusivee.

Why are we a target, and say--Canada--isn't? Why isn't France or Spain a target? How about Italy?

Because everyone is smart enough to know that if they fuck with any of those countries the USA will become involved. Well, everyone but you.

Ever hear of NATO? Look it up.

Spain was a target,or don't you remember,Changed the government,or don't you remember.US isn't the center of the universe

#151 | Posted by bruceaz at 2009-07-02 07:07 AM | Reply | Flag

Gee--I wonder why Spain isn't pissing their pants and invading countries. I guess you didn't see the other countries mentioned. Maybe the sun was in your eyes, or your head was up your ass.

Damn y'all fer making Glenn Beck looks like he ain't got no kinda sense. What Glenn's friend be saying is that the Osama Bin Laden needs to get him another terrrorism a going to cook the hair country up in to the USA USA USA mode. Then we is a gonna have us a rallys and have us some USA USA USA and chants us about about our new preserdent thats a coming to the White POwer House. That's wright its a gonna be the Sarah Barricuder Palin coming on up to the the White Power House and fights them terrorists and Leberalls and Sochallests. Ain't a gonna be no more kinds of terroristas after Palin and Bachsmann gets on taking over this a hair country with the USA USA USA good parts of the states to make it a good nation of capitalims and constituionalizing again. Then ain't a gonna be no kinda Obamas and Osamas and thems leberalls and terrorests and sochallests is all a gonna be kilt by Todd Palin using his sniper shooting skills from his sky machine as he and Sarah flies aroudn the werld and a shoots them all. And then ain'ts a gonna be no mores MSNBC and only the fox News on the TV and Al-Rushbo on the Radio and Al-Rushbo gonna have him a new TV show with hims a talking and everyone just a watchin him get all sweaty and jiggly as he talks all 140% correct on the them leberalls sochallests, communests Russialanders Obamaers and other bad folk. So heck yeah dudes, we needs us a a Osama to be comign on back over to the USA USA USA just like Glenn says we be needing. Then we's a gonna have us prosperity again just'n likes when the Lord had the George W Bush a running the USA USA USA.

They're basically admitting that they cynically used the tragedy of 9/11 to forward and agenda and long for the day they can use the next human tragedy to once again persue that agenda.

People who think this way should be dragged out into the streets and shot in the face.


How can anybody really take this seriously?


#3 | Posted by TheTom


Too bad Ish Kabibble checked out for the afternoon or he'd show you.

#4 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue at


pretty funny stuff here allright...


and I guess this means that every guest on cnn is saying what they all believe in as well

this guy is wrong and beck was obviously put off by his comments.
this "AINT" the way

The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States."


Sadly, this is exactly what the Bush Adminstration thought in 2001.

#5 | Posted by Manypaths at

so can you produce a source for this?

Trust me. The idiots that watch take it very, VERY seriously.


As if it were NEWS or something. Where would they ever get that idea?

#6 | Posted by Manypaths


AGAIN
from now on then
EACH AND every guest on cnn is a spokeman for that network and anyone who watches it.

Maybe if we spent some of that military money on education, we wouldn't have a 40% drop out rate, and a job shift to India because they are the ones who's kids can read a book.

#133 | POSTED BY BUFFALO_BOB AT 2009-07-02 03:10 AM | REPLY | FLAG

We're a target, Boob, because we use the largest amount of the world's resources, which happens to help maintain our standard of living. Also, since WWII, we've taken on the role of keeping our allies safe from our enemies.

Since when is education something for the feds. Where the fuck in the constitution does it say that is a federal vs. state issue?

I guess you'll be getting the nanny state you always wanted. Just don't get sick, cause you'll have some wonk deciding whether your sorry ass is worthy to save or not. Cost/benefit analysis on health care expenditure/your life.

Since when is education something for the feds. Where the fuck in the constitution does it say that is a federal vs. state issue?


it doesnt..just as it doesnt say shit about a lot of stuff going on these days from both parties.

the dept of education has done more to dumb down schools in the history of education.

and a waste of money as well

So what if he did say it. What are you doing different?

I don't know what you're looking for here, BeachBuzz. My comment was about the insanity of hoping for a terror attack in the United States to achieve a goal, whether that goal is the defeat of the other team's president or anything else.

My message to Scheuer and the neocons who say the same kind of thing: If you're [rooting for|hoping for|looking for the silver lining in] another 9/11, you've lost whatever argument you were trying to make. Thanks for playing.

We're a target, Boob, because we use the largest amount of the world's resources,

So people want to attack us because we use the largest amount of resources. What a battle cry--Down with the US--They use too many rsources. What an idiot you are. You'll believe anything the right says.

Also, since WWII, we've taken on the role of keeping our allies safe from our enemies.

What allies from what enemies? BOOO what a pants pisser you are. You should get an award for cowardice. THE RUSH LIMPDICK CHICKENSHIT AWARD.

Since when is education something for the feds. Where the fuck in the constitution does it say that is a federal vs. state issue?

It doesn't. The country that educates their citizens will be the most successful. Not that education means much to people like yourself. If America want to maintain leadership--America will have to step up and educate its citizens.

I guess you'll be getting the nanny state you always wanted.

Wanting an educated society is wanting a nanny state? No---I would say a pants pisser like yourself that wants to spend billions because of your weak bladder control is the one who wants the nanny state. Whats the matter--can't protect you and your family yourself?

Just don't get sick, cause you'll have some wonk deciding whether your sorry ass is worthy to save or not. Cost/benefit analysis on health care expenditure/your life.

That's exactly the system we have now moron. Your stupidity is outclassed only by your ignorance.

#158 | Posted by somoco at 2009-07-02 11:12 AM | Reply |

Oh.

I see Wrecks Zitgrease is back, and was apparently raging drunk again last night.

Any thread can turn into a y00tube metal mashup when Rexy's on the bottle!

Jesus.

Also, since WWII, we've taken on the role of keeping our allies safe from our enemies.

I don't want to be the world's policeman. Do you? There's a word for countries in history that have believed they had custodianship over the entire world: hubris.


We should all have our guns in the loaded ready position in our homes, never know who is going to breakin and steal all our valuables.

#60 | Posted by roman


The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.


Give me liberty, or give me death!


We have a bunch of wusses in our country today.


Also, since WWII, we've taken on the role of keeping our allies safe from our enemies.


I don't want to be the world's policeman. Do you? There's a word for countries in history that have believed they had custodianship over the entire world: hubris.

#163 | Posted by rcade at 2009-07


but surely you consider that there are times when we have to act for the good of oppresed people because no one else will do it

afghanistan for instance
imagine how long it would take if the whole world were there with us....
of course there is always the point that afghanistan is almost like no other place in the world with all of the tribes and shit but my point is..

there are times when force is the only way to save people.

DAFUR maybe or one of those places...

I dont think you are excluding ANY time we should be involved like that are you?

#165. No, we ought to crawl in a hole, and not engage anyone or try to dictate to anyone what we think is right. If they want to commit genocide, let 'em. If they want to develop nukes, let 'em. If they want to start war with their neighbors in strategic parts of the world, let 'em. If they want to fly planes into our buildings, we can squirm, but no military action.

Feds should support local education through tax dollars. The Dept. of Education is not a waste of money. National healthcare will be good for business. We should redistribute our wealth with other parts of the world. Cap and trade will be beneficial. Our deficits to make the above happen are sustainable. GM will make better cars given "guidelines" provided to it be our govt.

Buffalo Boob

WHEW....
you got me there somoco

I was reading your post with just glancing at bob's name on the bottom thinking it was him because you have captured him to a 'T"....

good one..you got me...

#151 | Posted by TinyElvis at 2009-07-02 10:03 AM | Reply | Flag:

Tiny Elvis is on Beck's Side!

Clearly he cant be wrong!

He's also rooting for his favorite baseball team to lose, that way they can win in the future.

Why are you paying so much attention to Glenn Beck? He says these things so that you'll pay more attention to him!

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable