The outrage of the Duke faculty is not yet manifest. Where is the lynch mob? The falsely accused Duke players were accused of violating a prostitute, not a vulnerable five year old boy. And the victim is a black child, exploited by a depraved white man. My, oh my. Faculty, sign petitions. Demonstrate. Denigrate the perpetrator. Or wiat for judgment. After all, he may be innocent.
If the boy was indeed adopted, it just demonstrates what a (physically) loving home placement was found. So much for gay adoptions. In a heterosexual setting, the wife would have almost always protected the child from violation. WAs "the partner" complicit? The story is silent on the "partner's" knowledge or innocence and the possibility of condonation.
Gays want the "right" to access to young males in situations in which they are vulnerable. The Boy Scouts have been attacked by gay groups for being unwilling to place their charges in the care of authority figures who can exploit them on overnight trips or serve as deviate role models. I stopped contributing to United Way when they removed the BSA as recipients of donations to palcate homosexuals.
Who should be surprised. Gays are reportedly very promiscuous, and sex is the driving force in their lives. So they try to position themselves to exploit the vulnerable. The response of a weak and depraved society that enables gays to demand the opportunity to engage in pedophilia deserves condemnation. I certainly don't want my boys exposed to gay scoutmasters as role models. Swishing in their own community is one thing, accepting it as a norm for boys is another. And I most certainly would not expose a child of mine to sexual molestation by leaving him subject to the authority of gays..
Willie Sutton, the bank robber, was asked why he robbed banks. He said, "Because that's where the money is." If homosexuals answered honestly regarding their striving to place boys in positions of vulnerability, ranging from Priests who misused church office, to adoptions by homosexuals, to demands by homosexuals for unrestricted participation in activities with boys as with the BSA, when asked what their intentions are, how many would declare that it is the opportunity to perform as pedophiles.
If this creep is guilty he should do the full 20 years taking the youth and vulnerability of the child into account, and the apparently contrived convoluted plot for securing an opportunity to exploit the child by adopting him.
