"Yes. A single manned vehicle with supplies launched ahead. I clearly stated that. Do I need to link to my post on that, too, and rub your nose in your lies again?
You really are a glutton for [unishment aren't your, furrytroll?
#147 | Posted by goatman"
No GoatTroll you were clearly stating a single launch as your following statements say. You really are a lying sack of shit aren't you?
So you think it would be cheaper if building a car in space to use one mission to take the transmission, another to take the engine, another to take the body, etc.? LOL Though it would take more energy to take the whole thing up at once, it would be cheaper than doing it piecemeal because each time you have to expend energy to lift the launch vehicle and the fuel itself.
It takes as much if not more energy to get mass into terrestrial orbit a little bit at a time (more because more missions are require) vs all at once. You do understand HS physics, don't you? The extra missions would cost much more, too. You do understand basic economics, don't you?
It takes as much if not more energy to get mass into terrestrial orbit a little bit at a time (more because more missions are require) vs all at once. You do understand HS physics, don't you? The extra missions would cost much more, too. You do understand basic economics, don't you?