Funny how the press is blowing this up...when they were the same people that said, when Bill Clinton shot a wad on the Blue Dress, "its only sex"
You've got to be kidding, or your brain tumor is getting much larger. The conservative press hounded Clinton about that BJ for years, and NEVER said "it was just sex". Check with your doctor, the delusions are getting worse.
Where was the same outrage when Edwards screwed around- HAD A CHILD by another woman, and his wife HAD CANCER which he paraded around to see if he could pick up sympathy votes...
Edwards wasn't holding and office, and Edwards is out of the political Picture for life--that's where the outrage is.
or how about Elliott "Here's a Hundred" Spitzer?
How about him? He is no longer governor. Resigned in disgrace---should we shoot him too? What does your tumor recommend?
So don't get all "holier than thou" when you can take all the Kennedy's,
Kennedy did nothing that Bushs wife didn't do--except there was no water involved.
and Queen Barney (who employeed his signficant other at Fannie Mae),
Barney is open about his sexual preference--that you fail to see the difference between Frank who loves to suck dicks openly, and Sanford who loves to suck dicks but attacks other dick suckers is an indication of the severity of your tumor. Have then step up the radiation treatments--they aren't doing the job.
Clinton
Still harping about Clintons BJ and wondering why people talk about reps who love to suck dick. Strange, but expected.
and the rest.
You mean these guys?
www.armchairsubversive.org
Keeping it in your pants is not a Republican or Democrat problem - it is primarily male
The point isn't about keeping it in your pants. The point is about hypocrisy. That you are too dim too perceive this is indicative of your growing tumor robbing you of your ability to reason. You sould hope it's a tumor, since that can be cured. If you have no tumor, you are simply incredibly stupid.
(after all ..who would screw Pelosi...EWWww....)
I doubt you would ever have anything that good.
#220 | Posted by foshaffer at 2009-06-24 05:30 PM | Reply | Flag: