again ppl: substance vs. chaff.
sorry about this but... for example, "when Clinton lied no one died."
Obama may be killing YOUR version of America, Bush killed your sons and daughters... and many, many more.
so, you see one comparison has at least SOME substance while the other little to zero.
and most of you rightie freaks ARE little Eichmans -- look it up, then look in a mirror.
here, i'll help youse out:
Little Eichmanns is a phrase coined by anarcho-primitivist John Zerzan to describe the complicity of those who participate in destructive and immoral systems in a way that, although on an individual scale may seem indirect, when taken collectively have an effect comparable to Nazi official Adolf Eichmann's role in The Holocaust. Zerzan used the phrase in his essay Whose Unabomber? in 1995.
...
In Zerzan's essay "Whose Unabomber?" (1995), he signaled his support for the Kaczynski doctrine, but criticised the bombings:
...the mailing of explosive devices intended for the agents who are engineering the present catastrophe is too random. Children, mail carriers, and others could easily be killed. Even if one granted the legitimacy of striking at the high-tech horror show by terrorizing its indispensable architects, collateral harm is not justifiable...
However, Zerzan in the same essay offered a qualified defense of the Unabomber's actions:
The concept of justice should not be overlooked in considering the Unabomber phenomenon. In fact, except for his targets, when have the many little Eichmanns who are preparing the Brave New World ever been called to account? Is it unethical to try to stop those whose contributions are bringing an unprecedented assault on life?
see: Scott Roeder: Montana Freemen, Sovereign Citizen Movement, et al.
...again there have been 9 murders since Obama was elected, all related in similar ways.
www.npr.org