Indica genes are the basis for hash making and have been for centuries.
Sativas can be hashed out as well, you wont get as much quantity of hash, because, as you say, sativas produce less bud, but I'm betting the quality will be far superior.
They make better hash because they have more resin per bud...
It hasn't been my experieence that indicas produce more resin per bud, quite the opposite in fact. Besides, more resin just means more hash, not better hash, because all hash is, is the resin removed from the leaf and calyx material.
...and the bud-to-leaf ratio is far greater than skinny, leggy, long-flowering sativas.
Again, that hasn't been my experience. Sativas, and sativa leaning skunks, produce far fewer leafs than indicas on the flowers, therefore needing a lot less manicuring than the other. I dread manicuring an indica at harvest time, I get sick of cutting out all those little single blade leafs.
In a few years 15% will be swag.
R8RH8R, can you shed some light on this and tell me where these people come up with these THC percentage numbers, surely it's not by volume or weight, is it? To me that seems highly improbable.
This Congressman should be greatful; most "super bud" sold on the street is grown right here in the USofA, and is one less bag of Mexican blood-weed for the cartels to buy bullets with.
Damn right, Gandhi would probably call it home-grown, if he were here with us today, rather than the home-spun fabric he made famous.
Whoever was to make such an argument would surely be mocked. Nonetheless, I'd still like to hear it...
I'd say, it's because all these couch lock indica genes are being infused into the gene pool, to make indoor grows more manageable, that the soaring euphoric high that was so prevalent 20 years ago is being bred out of the cannabis, and if that's what your looking for you'll have to grow your own, because you ain't going to find it on the street now days:)