Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, June 21, 2009

President Barack Obama on Saturday challenged Iran's government to halt a "violent and unjust" crackdown on dissenters. "We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people," Obama said in a written statement. "The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Corky

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

ouch. that musta stung.

McCain should quit giving aid and comfort to the enemy, the Iranian establishment; it's just what they want for their internal propaganda, the US directly promoting the uprising.

It gives them even more licence for their brutality.

You'd think he'd listen to his foreign policy advisor from the campaign, Henry Kissinger, or to Richard Luger-R of the Foreign Intel Committee.

But no, trying to score partisan political capitol instead of backing his Pres is typical of his ilk.

Obama has handled this wisely, including this last statement, instead of mimicking the same old GOP bullying that everyone else in the world knows is nonsense.

Obama's just repeating all the things that McCain told him to say on Wednesday. Rahm was a little late getting that last poll, so Obama was only 5 days late this time to finally do the right thing. Foreign policy on CP time.

This crisis in Iran has more than ever convinced me that "bomb, bomb, bomb, let's bomb Iran" McCain never belonged in the Oval Office and his comments this past week just made me want to tell him to STFU you ignorant fool.
WE tried the foreign policy of threats and invasions, it's time to try intelligence and diplomacy, nuance and maturity.

Hey Corky, why don't you post that same crap on yet another thread, you lazy unoriginal him/her thing?

"STFU you ignorant fool."
#4 | Posted by danni

This is getting to be a common post for Danni.

#5 | Posted by tedoffensive at 2009-06-20 09:38 PM | Reply | Flag: Only pisses him off because he has no retort.

Yes, they should designate "protest zones" for those who wish to express their opposition.
That may work better?

"and to them... I say.. open your fist..."

"and to you... I say... close your fist...".

Shut up already, Damar-Bachay... nobody gives a shit. LOL

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2009-06-21 12:07 AM | Reply | Flag (X) Pissed 'cause he got busted being a lazy piece of crap. Cut N' Paste that comment some more, Corky. You're only up to three so far. Shame you're the only one that thought it was so significant.

"STFU you ignorant fool."
#4 | Posted by danni

"This is getting to be a common post for Danni."
#6 | Posted by KBM

That's all she's got, STFU and ...

Democrats...GOOD!
Republicans...BAD!

It's not necessary to actually read any of her posts. They are ALL gonna be one of those two themes.

Good move by Obama. His number one objective was, correctly, to avoid being blamed for interfering. Picking a time and situation where the Iranian leadership is acting irresponsibly is a great time to step to support the opposition. He can be blaimed only for opposing violence, not for trying to influence Iranian politics.

This crisis in Iran has more than ever convinced me that "bomb, bomb, bomb, let's bomb Iran" McCain never belonged in the Oval Office and his comments this past week just made me want to tell him to STFU you ignorant fool.
WE tried the foreign policy of threats and invasions, it's time to try intelligence and diplomacy, nuance and maturity.

#4 | Posted by danni at 2009

I could take this comment and place it with anything ever said by dems when reagan called out the ussr

and .,,.dANNI>..sit down because you wont like this

REAGAN WAS RIGHT..........

Democrats...GOOD!
Republicans...BAD!

It's not necessary to actually read any of her posts. They are ALL gonna be one of those two themes.

#11 | Posted by jestgettinalong at 2009

AW dont cut her short

she also hates business too.......

Firstly, it is possible, but very unlikely, that the current street protests will lead to an overthrow of the current Iranian regime.
More importantly, for those of you bickering over whether or not the President should make or not make comments to incite the situation, the reality is that really nothing the President says is gonna change a damn thing. At most, he'll piss off the Iranians who are paranoid about American intervention.
You wingnuts who seem to think that a "strongly worded scolding" by Obama will have any effect on the situation are just plain stupid. Try studying a little Iranian history a little before strongly expressing opinions with no basis in reality.

bite us all bitch...

just plain stupid???

AGAIN...exactly what dems said about reagan on the comment about poland and other incidents.
he was right and dems were wrong...AGAIN>.
No one is saying he should make comments like you are saying......and we KNOW there is little we can do which is why its all that much more important that they know we ARE READING The signs they made in English.
and maybe you can back off of the pious ego attitude.

its apparent that this caught the obama team off guard as it may have us too......but he is supposed to be the LEADER OF the free world..not a FOLLOWER...

...the reality is that really nothing the President says is gonna change a damn thing.

Depends on who the president is though, right? I remember the lefties all in a tizzy at Bush for being silent instead of speaking out on certain issues.

Gotta love that double standard!

oh please...

WHAT double standard...LOL

meanwhile the American media focuses on Iran & North Korea hoping no one notices the coming largest bonus payouts ever in Goldman Sach's 140 year history

goldman sachs is the previous address of more than one obama team member...

would that have something to do with it...

DAMN...now that I said that I cant remember which ones....was it summers???

no it was one of the others...

one of the newer co-owners of the Fed, too...bls

yeah...I remember reading something about that......

I am about to go to the stacks and look in that section to find a book to read about the 'fed'...

that and something about the federalist papers.

GEESH

thats pretty heady reading...I better get something about the bio of soupy sales too in order to retain sanity.

I am overwhelmed by the stupidity of BL2 and Goatman who actually seem to believe that anything President Obama says will change the situation on the streets of Tehran. There is no double standard or other such bullshit in play here. The worst thing Obama could do would be to try and incite the protesters and play straight in the hands of the Islamist hardliners. I am amazed that so many righties have become so blinded by their own ideology that the common sense of the situation blinds them. Wow. Obviously Rush or Fox or some similar outlet must be goading on the wingnut legions.

"I am overwhelmed by the stupidity of BL2 and Goatman "

Well, they're both Texan tards.

...Goatman who actually seem to believe that anything President Obama says will change the situation on the streets of Tehran.

???

I do? I didn't know that. Thanks for letting me know what I think.

Seriously, why do you find it necessary to put words in my mouth? Don't you have any clue how idiotic that makes you appear? Either you don't or you enjoy playing the fool. Which is it?

Well, they're both Texan tards.

And of course nullset supports the liar who puts words in my mouth. I'd say by doing so that makes you more retarded than any Texan. Birds of a feather and all that, so I guess you will always throw your support to the liars and losers.

Now please get your nose out of my ass, null. Haven't you had enough of it yet? You are quite the naughty little troll today, aren't you? I am beginning to be ashamed to claim you as mine anymore.

Right on schedule. 2 Goat posts for one of mine. LOL. He's my puppet. Dance, Goatman, dance!

Dance, Goatman, dance!

I've been dancing all morning ...

(I'll finish on another post since you seem to enjoy my prolificity of them so much)

"The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights."
* * * *

LMAO. Sure, we do.

"Assembly" and "free speech" are not universal rights. Check out many of the countries where the exercise of such "rights" will get you dead.

As we speak, Iranians are fighting for their freedom and for democracy.

However...I am curious about something.

Would this be happening in Iran today, if Saddam Hussein were still in power in Iraq?

Would these young people in Iran have the courage and confidence to stand up to their suppressors, if the United States had not gone into Iraq and delivered those people from a tyrant?

I wonder...

Is it possible the invasion of Iraq is going to prove to be the catalyst for a freedom revolution in Iran?

However...I am curious about something.

Would this be happening in Iran today, if Saddam Hussein were still in power in Iraq?

WTF?

To answer yer question Bill, yes it would still be happening.

It may even have happened earlier.

Chney's sabre rattling in the Gulf towards Iran may well have helped consolidate power in Iran due to concerns that Iran was to be next.

In fact, by creating a power vacuum in Iraq Bush indirectly gave Iran's clerics more power in the region than they enjoyed before the invasion.

This backlash against the excesses of the Iranian revolution is, in many respects, as inevitable as the Iranian revolution itself was.

By refusing to talk with Iran (or NK fer that matter) as a matter of policy the US actually empowered the powers that be there.

The way BushCo went about toppling Saddam led to the death of hundreds of thousands, the refugee status of millions and an increase in both global hatred of American policy and terrorism.

If the Iraqi people ever manage to get their shit together after this clusterfuck in the sand it will be despite not because of Bush.

If the Iranian people ever manage to get the theocratic monkey off their backs it will be because of their own efforts and despite American policy not because of it.

K?

Be Well.

Return my lunch money at once, Francis!

- Barack Obama circa 1972.

He forgot to say please...

Events are outrunning Barry as the horses escaped the barn, the train left the station, and the cows are in the corn.

Farm Worker Thom

"Is it possible the invasion of Iraq is going to prove to be the catalyst for a freedom revolution in Iran?"

More likely it is the glue that held the religious dictatorship together these past few years.
1,000,000 went into the streets with candles to sympathize with America after 9-11, their government even offered to cooperate against Al Quaeda, fortunately Bush named them as part of the Axis of Evil and Ayatollah Khameni has been thankful since.

ouch. that musta stung.
#1 | Posted by nanc at 2009-06-20 06:42 PM

In other words, you have no clue yourself what to do, but if Obama does something or doesn't do something, it must be wrong.

Psssst: Obama, attacking the Iranian government can only give it credibility in the eyes of Iranians. Just beacause the GOP is demanding you butt into the situation and ruin in doesn't mean you have to.......

I don't understand the support of the Right-wing for the protesters in Iran.
Aren't you the same ones decrying when Americans protest? Aren't you the same folks cheering on as cops knock old ladies to the ground in Denver for doing the same thing? Don't these people have jobs? Aren't they breaking the law?

I am overwhelmed by the stupidity of BL2 and Goatman who actually seem to believe that anything President Obama says will change the situation on the streets of Tehran.-Moder8

Well, you are quite naive if you think that there is nothing Obama could say that would have an effect on what is going on. There is plenty he could say that would incite much more civil unrest.

spud and danni make some very good points, it was strange to vilify iran the way bush did when we were toppling two sunni countries, shit, we made iran's day by taking out their enemies. yes we could have and most likely should have cashed in on that credit and have iranian leaders help us in the iraq reconstruction. that would have been very beneficial to our troops in the region and iraq's future.

BUT that would also have been legitimizing their ruling body no? i mean danni, u scream bloody murder about us trading etc with china because of their lack of human rights, but u think it would have been perfectly okay to team up with iranian leaders? the most anti-feminists in the world? how can u get mad about our dealings with china but claim we should do the same with iran?

and the two of you can't put down Bill's post completely, there might be some truth to it, that it empowered the iranian people BY NOT legitimizing their ruling body.

besides we made a back door deal with them in '05, that we'll back off the nuke issue and they back the F out of iraq. look at how quickly things changed from then on. so we got the benefit of not publicly legitimizing them while getting the benefit of their 'somewhat' cooperation in iraq. not a bad deal. i wish i could find the article on that but its gone.

and to clarify, how do u danni think we should re-shape (or not) our policy towards Cuba?

The Iranians know that whatever Obama says will be nuanced, watered down, and completely devoid of any principles whatsoever. And Obama knows they know it. So he concerns himself with another boondoggle giveaway to American seniors, and let's the nuclearization of North Korea and Iran proceed. Last week N Korea announced they would try to fire a missile at Hawaii, and he answered by . . . beefing up anti-missile defense on Hawaii.

Last I checked, that's an act of war, and he did nothing. Hard to imagine that I'm the only one who noticed.

certainly more than invading Iraq & her cousins...

how much have you been making on your SELL, SELL?

As much as 'em Goldman Sach folks?

Up 28.9% year to date. I don't know how well Goldman's doing, but I'm laboring without hundreds of billions of taxpayer money flooding in.

28.2%. My mistake.

"Is it possible the invasion of Iraq is going to prove to be the catalyst for a freedom revolution in Iran?" - BillJohnson

"What is clear is that actively destabilizing Iran is shaping up to be the key to the neocon strategy of eliminating any 'third way' for Islamic countries,"
www.counterpunch.org

What is happening is the neocon dream....

The hawks' grand plan differs depending on whom you speak to, but the basic outline runs like this: The United States establishes a reasonably democratic, pro-Western government in Iraq--assume it falls somewhere between Turkey and Jordan on the spectrum of democracy and the rule of law. Not perfect, representative democracy, certainly, but a system infinitely preferable to Saddam's. The example of a democratic Iraq will radically change the political dynamics of the Middle East. When Palestinians see average Iraqis beginning to enjoy real freedom and economic opportunity, they'll want the same themselves. With that happy prospect on one hand and implacable United States will on the other, they'll demand that the Palestinian Authority reform politically and negotiate with Israel. That in turn will lead to a real peace deal between the Israelis and Palestinians. A democratic Iraq will also hasten the fall of the fundamentalist Shi'a mullahs in Iran, whose citizens are gradually adopting anti-fanatic, pro-Western sympathies. A democratized Iran would create a string of democratic, pro-Western governments (Turkey, Iraq, and Iran) stretching across the historical heartland of Islam.
www.washingtonmonthly.com

State Department advisor Jared Cohen earlier this week emailed the co-founder of Twitter, requesting that they postpone a scheduled maintenance downtime. The reason? It was a critical moment for the demonstrators, and service needed to go uninterrupted. Twitter complied. The fact that a US government official is able have such pull, while not surprising, tends to get lost in a green wave of reports about social media belonging to "people power". Who gets to place these calls and get results?

Cohen's access should be even less surprising, given his role in State Department efforts to harness the power of social media. To wit, his role as press contact for the Alliance of Youth Movements. Launched in late 2008 with a Summit in NYC, the AYM gathered together an ensemble of media corporations, Obama consultants, social network entrepreneurs, and youth organizations, under the auspices of the State Department. Representatives came from Media Old (MTV, NBC, CNN) and New (Google and especially Facebook). The AYM produced a Field Manual and a series of How-to videos (How to Create a Grassroots Movement Using Social-Networking Sites, How to Smart Mob, How to Circumvent an Internet Proxy). The goal was to have youth leaders from around the world learn, share & discuss how to build powerful grassroots movements.

This Alliance is a "Genetically Modified Grassroots Organization" (GMGO). Neither wholly emerging from below (grassroots) nor purely invented by external forces (the Astroturfing done by public relations groups), these emergent groups are seeded (and their genetic code altered) to control the direction of the movement.

why is it that when i hear Obama try and sound tough it reminds me of a girl taking a swing at me?

(no offense ladies. i know that some of you hit hard.)

very interesting information there Nutcase.

"yes we could have and most likely should have cashed in on that credit and have iranian leaders help us in the iraq reconstruction. that would have been very beneficial to our troops in the region and iraq's future." #44 | Posted by yodar013 at 2009-06-22 02:04 PM

You do realize that Iran is participating in the recontruction of Iraq, right? Syria has been helping too. they weren't invited, but they are there. however, how are insurgents from those two countries helping our soldiers? by bombing and shooting them? do you really believe if we offered Iran to "help" reconstruct Iraq after the invasion they would have? u.s.? the great satan? just a suggestion: get a grip on reality and move a little further away from theory.

Obama is such a leader--it only took 8 days.

Stand back and let it all be.

Worked for Clinton and Rwanda.

obama has no influence over our foes and very little with our friends -he is a brown version of carter
jasman

The whole world knows Obama's a lightweight who spent four days chasing his tail trying to deal with 4 raggedy-a$$ed Somali pirates. Whut's he gonna do when a heavyweight calls his bluff, hide behind Hillary or Pelosi? We're in some deep $hite with this bozo in charge. He's in way over his head but his ego keeps him from reality.

Sad, really sad, that all you dumba$$ voters fell for this clown.

It must give great assurance to the people on the street in Iran to know that Obama issues words of support and a willingness to "negotiate" with the repressive theocratic regime.

Let's see. Kennedy went to Berlin to denounce the communist tyrants. But then, JFK, whatever his faults, was not a hater of America, Americans, and American values, making abject apologies to dictators and tyrants, regimes not worthy of existing in the same world as the United States, which is the beacon on the hill.

And Obama is the Islamic-lover and man who wants to level America in the interests of "oppressed people" everywhere (code words for minorities, blacks and "people of color"), and is willing to sacrifice American interests in behalf of elevating "others." Well, Americans with their self-loathing, chose this man who despises America and American values, so here we are.

While Obama is destroying the American economy and basks in the adulation of a media that lacks the intelligence to discern his programs and is unbelieving of his stated aims as another generations dupes were of Hitler's, despite the fact that they both repeatedly declared them. Few believe that such radical goals are truly sought by Obama. Well, to date all of his actions are consonant with what he indicated.

Here we have a psychotic leading the nation, a self-medicating schizophrenic, who is deluded into believing that "his messianic presence" will impel people to abide by his wishes. His persona is complicated by the fact that he is a narcissist and sociopath, who preens and postures. This caricature of a human being suffers from neurological damage and finds it difficult to utter a series of coherent thoughts. He is reduced to reading teleprompters and is reduced to mouthing "ers and ahs" without it. A mind is a terrible thing to waste, but you need to wonder if he further damaged his with his acknowledged hard drug use.

What a pathetic people we have become to value such a depraved lunatic, and follow him unthinkingly. Actions that would have resulted in calls for impeachment of other Presidents are withheld from public view or are causes quickly abandoned, such as the criminal corruption of the Obama regime which protected the alleged criminal conduct of an Obama supporter, the Mayor of Sacramento, by removing the Inspector General who prepared the report and removed him on obviously specious grounds. You need to wonder why the media have relinquished their charge. Whatever has become of crusading journalists and muckrackers, and remember that colonial and early revolutionary times newspaperman who ... Ah, what the heck, the glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome, and what is America now but descending into the trash heap of history at an accelerated pace having selected an evil nincompoopish clown as its leader. Where has gravitas gone?

What has happened to the Peter Zengers of the world?

Excerpt:

Those of us who were once actually taught American history remember
well the story of John Peter Zenger, the pre-Revolutionary War colonial
newspaperman tried for seditious libel in 1734 because of his attacks on
the colonial Governor of New York. Zenger was acquitted by the jury in spite
of pressure from the judge and this was said to stand for the proposition,
in the words of his attorney, that "exposing ... public wickedness... can never
be a libel ...". This case and the pamphleteers such as Thomas Paine who
supported our Revolution were in large part responsible for the high regard
in which our Founding Fathers held a free press.

www.danvillethinker.com

Where has gravitas gone?

Bush and Cheney combined had less gravitas than a speck of fly shit.

Be Well.

Johnson get your fucking facts straight. BushCo destroyed our economy with extra effort by Greenspan. What Wall Street wants Washingtopn delivers. Its called legalized bribery and both parties play it.

No question about it, Obama has rolled over for the same international fraudsters. But, he possesses more intelligence in his index finger than Bush has exhibited in his entire life.

After not objecting to Shrub's unprecedented waste and corruption in working closely with Enron, Goldman-Sachs, Big Oil, Big Pharma; wiretapping from day one for blackmail purposes; squandering our future in Iraq and losing the war on terror. Suddenly now, Rethuglicans want to be more careful with money? Only because they only want it to go to their largest contributors. Those fraudsters want it all and so far, they're getting it.

Every car in the United States could have been provided free gas for what the idiot wasted in Iraq. But that was the point. If you follow this family carefully you would understand that many of their actions seek to increase the cost of oil.

Where did that money come from and where did it go with so little discussion? What Shrub did is at least ten times worse than what Obama has proposed. For one thing we get SOMETHING for Obama's spending. There is no comparison between what has been done and what is on the table now.

We are lucky to be rid of the Bush Crime Family for now, though not the consequences of their policies. They are a treasonous lot, operating international scams with the bin Laden Family, Fauds, Noriega, Hussein, Iran, Contras often behind the backs of elected officials. Not to mention using computer technology to steal elections. Killing their busines partners and those who investigated their cocaine smuggling and election fraud have committed suicide.

WE tried the foreign policy of threats and invasions, it's time to try intelligence and diplomacy, nuance and maturity.

In other words..... Ignore the iran issue....

Nuance... That's a good one... Fucking libs...

Hitler would have eaten your children. You would have let him too.

"Johnson get your fucking facts straight. BushCo destroyed our economy with extra effort by Greenspan. What Wall Street wants Washingtopn delivers. Its called legalized bribery and both parties play it."

Actually, I'd say Bush and Paulson, the treasury secretary who started the stimulus pork ball rolling with scare talk and then refused to account for how the money was spent. He should be prosecuted. But your overall view I agree with, adding only the housing loan debacle belongs to my party, unfortunately.

Just exactly how did Bush destroy our economy?

Just curious

I do remember people being encouraged to borrow money and user credit in some speeches which I thought was odd...

But how did Bush destroy our economy?

Two wars and massive government expansion without raising taxes or cutting expense.

How did the wars effect the economy?

Government expansion does not = Economy either...

You don't see how spending billions more than usual while lowering taxes would hurt the economy?

No it has nothing what so ever to do with the PRIVATE SECTOR which is what the economy is... The lower taxes should have helped the economy...

Tha main factor in the economy is that people borrowed too much money and can't pay it back...

Has nothing to do with the war.

If joe borrowed 400,000 to buy a home at the peak two years of the bubble, He now ows 400,000 on a house that is only worth 275,000. You don't seem to get that...

Millions of people did this very thing.

PRIVATE SECTOR which is what the economy is

A part does not the whole make.

Pay has decreased....

People owe more than their homes are worth....

Banks Are broke.....

Nothing to do with the war I am afraid...

Bush's budget was never over a trillion...

Obama budget is three T's...

read this www.cbpp.org

We spend huge amounts on military spending but much of it was not war related...

Still has nothing to do with the economy.

A part does not the whole make.

So you realy have no idea what the heck you are even talking about....

All you know is BUSH did it!

Sad realy.... You are brainwashed... Was the coolaid good dear?

Barny frank the Democrat ran the banks who caused the economy to crash... Not Bush...

The economy was in trouble long before the housing crisis. Remember Tyco? Enron? Arthur Andersen? No, you probably don't.

#71

DO NOT MIX MY QUOTES IN WITH SOMEONE ELSE'S AND THEN PRETEND THEY WERE ALL FROM THE SAME PERSON. I knew you were dishonest, but that is disgusting.

Remember Tyco? Enron? Arthur Andersen?

Enron was small potatos you have no idea what the hell you are talking about..

I didn't mix your quote with anyones.. I just forgot to shut off the Ital and kept typing...

You just can't stand it when it's not BUSH's falt :'(

Barny frank the Democrat ran the banks who caused the economy to crash... Not Bush...

#71 | Posted by bashthis

this fellow is a lost cause...Kanrei

ignorance is bliss

this fellow is a lost cause...Kanrei

What is that supposed to mean...

You don't believe Barney Frank was part of Freddie Mac and Fannie May?

You have to be kidding...

www.zimbio.com

www.businessandmedia.org

citizenwells.wordpress.com

www.boston.com

www.foxnews.com

www.youtube.com

I could go on for years here dear...

I remember the lefties all in a tizzy at Bush for being silent instead of speaking out on certain issues.

Goat(I am NOT partisan)Man

really? I remember lefties "all in a tizzy" anytime Bush opened his stupid illiterate mouth. WE would have much rather he had just STFU and go away...and let the adults clean up his frakin mess. Thank God that painful episode is over in American History.

Haven't see your name endorsing Ron Paul's bill to audit the FED since he began his campaign...maybe I missed it?

Here's your chance here anyway to opin about it one way or another:>)

Aren't you the same ones decrying when Americans protest? Aren't you the same folks cheering on as cops knock old ladies to the ground in Denver for doing the same thing? Don't these people have jobs? Aren't they breaking the law?

#42 | Posted by TFDNihilist

Oh, come on. You have to admit that, here in the US, when there's a protest, it usually looks like the same 50 people at every one of them and some of the things that get protested are ridiculous. THAT is the ONLY reason a rightie will mock a protest. If it's for a good reason then hell yeah. Are you telling me that you have never shook your head at some of the things people get in a fuss over in the US?

Bush and Cheney combined had less gravitas than a speck of fly shit.

Be Well.

#59 | Posted by dethspud

You guys are going to have to start coming up with something else, because these tired retorts are seriously lame.

You guys are going to have to start coming up with something else, because these tired retorts are seriously lame.

#80 | Posted by everlong| Flag: Doesn't Read His Own Lame Shit

#82 | Posted by everlong at 2009-06-23 05:09 PM | Reply | Flag: Definitely gay

#82 | Posted by everlong|Flag: Touchy

Everlong, nulli is my troll. Keep your hands off of him!

Don't worry, Goatman. I want nothing to do with that one. And I think Doc is gay. Has he come out to the board yet?

And I think Doc is gay.
86 | Posted by everlong

The amount of time you tightie righties spend widly projecting as you speculate on other people's is not only a little odd but hilarious. Anyway, you just keep a-wishin' and a-hopin', and remember: If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

That's funny, Doc, since Nully was the first one to bring up the gay thing. I just continued it, yet you lay the blame on the rightie. Figures.

The amount of time you tightie righties spend widly projecting as you speculate on other people's is not only a little odd but hilarious.

there is no way you can believe that.

you know for a fact that northguy projects homosexuality onto others more than all other posters on the board put together

As I said, the amount of time some of you tightie righties spend wildly projecting as you speculate on other people's sexuality is not only odd but hilarious. And, now that I reflect on it, strangely sad. Nulli may've been the one who first uttered the word "gay," but, if you scroll back a bit you'll notice that the only little companero who thereafter associated it with another poster was...wait for it...wait for it: you. Such a sad sack.

"there is no way you can believe that."

Let's see now. Where do I say, "only." Oh, right, I didn't. I do have the sense that it mostly comes from the rightists. If you don't agree, do a count and get back with the results.

was...wait for it...wait for it: you. Such a sad sack.
#91 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

"You," in that case, refers not to Eberly but Everlong.

Whatever, Doc. Tell ya what. Do one of your searches, however it is that is done, and find one single other instance where I have even used the word gay on this site. Then maybe you will see how Nully using the reference first led me onto that road.

It really makes no difference to me, because this seems to be an issue with you. You really hold on tight to this notion that the right on this board "project" by using the gay retort.

"Do one of your searches..."
Of your posts? Please, don't flatter yourself. Cut to the chase: I couldn't be bothered.
"Then maybe you will see how Nully using the reference first led me onto that road."
Riiiight, it's his fault that you used the term. Sure. Of course. Naturally. LOL.
Stop embarrassing yourself.

Haven't see your name endorsing Ron Paul's bill to audit the FED since he began his campaign...maybe I missed it?

Here's your chance here anyway to opin about it one way or another:>)

#78 | Posted by Bani

bashful must be buzy finding more gay things in life:>)

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable