Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, June 10, 2009

A place to discuss the stories that aren't making news, ask questions, complain bitterly about this site and its members, or just screw around. The only rule: Be nice or be funny.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I disagree!

New GM Chairman declares: 'I don't know anything about cars'...

That's ok Obama doesn't know anything about being President...

And Second
...

That's ok Obama doesn't know anything about being President...


We have not had one that did in my lifetime and I am 38.

Well...38 in exactly one week. I am still 37 today.

#3 | Posted by kanrei

You would think by now we would just get lucky.

Where the hell is Joe Biden?

38????

please..

I have clothes that old.

that I still wear
you are still a young punk

#5
We are still alive...we have been very lucky. We need to hope the luck continues because it is fairly clear our electing skills will not improve anytime soon.

Where the hell is Joe Biden?

#6 | Posted by wisgod

He is visiting the Russian Embassy today something about launch codes...

Hello everyone....

Just checked in to see how you liberal pussies are doing!!

I see nothing has changed...

ITS JUST A DAMN good thing that democrats are in power now and have been since 2006 because the 'culture of corruption' HAS TO BE OVER with by now,.,.right??

NOT SO FAST THERE BUDDY

www.washingtontimes.com

#8 | Posted by kanrei

Kanrei I think that is because it is human nature to hold the party line be it Democrat or Republican. I wish the country would unite behind a third party and get rid of all incumbents...

watched biden this morning tell a police association in talking about sontamayor

HE Said...:"she will have your back":

okay so now if he is right, this lady will rule for the police all the time??

well how does that play with you liberal progressives anti-military statists commie pinkos

JOE says that the police will have the support of a SC justice in what appears to be always...

#12 - amen to that. as of last election, i'm finished being sorry for who i vote for.

rev. wright says jews in deecee won't let his son, obama, talk to him:

www.dailypress.com

AND AS TO The culture of corruption..

RUMOR is that a dealership complained to BARNEY FRANK about being closed and
MAGICALLY>....their name was removed from the closure list..

WELL>...liberals who HATED this sort of business when it was on that pesky little OTHER FOOT

IF TRUE..and I believe it to be...
'what say you?"

you know besides the standard liberal RETORT NO ANSWER of something about me....

Colbert Debates Don't Ask, Don't Tell In Front Of Audience Of Active Troops (VIDEO)

www.huffingtonpost.com

Obama: I'm a citizen of the world.

Gingrich: I'm not a citizen of the world.

Then, the guys on the radio are laughing at Gingrich for his comment because...

soundbite...

I'm a citizen of the world....Reagan.

lol

and one more before I let the libs here come back with another "NO answer"

price at pump up 40 cents in last MONTH

god damned obama

Is everyone ready for the big DTV switch on Friday???

Shit the way they've been going on about it for the last 6 mos you'd think that instead of changing broadcast modes we were changing the gas we breathe for survival from O2 to something else.

HE Said...:"she will have your back"

Posted by afkabl2

If it's wet and you're up against a caucasian for a promotion...

#13 | Posted by afkabl2

I learned something from "sontamayor" I never would have guessed that Latino women always make better decisions than regular white guys. I wonder what gives them this great power over the rest of us when it's time to make a wise decision. I think Obama was trying to say white males need not apply for this job...

North Korea (NK)

I wish President Obama had the guts to order we shoot down the next missile NK puts up in our direction. If we destroy their missile in mid-air nobody gets hurt as both missiles fall into the Pacific Ocean. If we miss, we damn well ought to fix our missile defense system, as NK is trying to fix their offensive missiles.

In either case the missiles would be destroyed harmlessly. What's wrong with doing this, Barack? If successful with our shot the world should show some respect. If we miss they could go on calling us paper tigers. In either case we could claim we are just playing harmlessly along, having a little fun without killing people but perhaps also stopping people from being killed. I would not trust the NK to be accurate with their tests.

What becomes of radios on Friday? So much talk about TVs, but is the analog radio signal going to change too?

witchcraft?:

apnews.myway.com

"I learned something from "sontamayor" I never would have guessed that Latino women always make better decisions than regular white guys."

Too bad she wasn't teaching reading comprehension.

"I wish the country would unite behind a third party and get rid of all incumbents..."

That is an idea lacking a thought.

and one more before I let the libs here come back with another "NO answer"

price at pump up 40 cents in last MONTH

god damned obama

#18 | Posted by afkabl2

ObviouSly you did not get the memo the goverment wants gas prices to go back to 5 dollors a gallon so they can sell the new OBAMAMOBILE that looks and drives like shit but gets 40 MPG. I'll stick with my Harley it gets 45 MPG without help from the Whitehouse...

Nanc,
Santeria don't mutilate. This is the work of some future Dhamer. I know my cats will not be going outside anymore which sucks for me because one uses the other as a doorbell and starts a fight everytime he wants out.

#19 | Posted by briwo

have my coupons but haven't bought the converters yet. remember a few months ago the guy who shot his t.v. up because some of his channels had made the switch?

a couple of months ago when we went to our cabin more than half the channels on antenna had switched - i eyeballed the .22 and thought better.

I wish the country would unite behind a third party and get rid of all incumbents..."

That is an idea lacking a thought.

#26 | Posted by danni at 2009

here is your AFKABL2 LIBERAL TraNSLATION

what she is really saying is that a third party might keep the dems from thier 'annoited' role in running things right into the toilet...like they are doing now.

The converters are 9 bucks after the coupon. Are you that broke nanc you can't afford one?

JOE says that the police will have the support of a SC justice in what appears to be always... -- #13 | Posted by afkabl2

Yes, but we all know who writes Biden's speeches: gammadyne.com

"I learned something from "sontamayor" I never would have guessed that Latino women always make better decisions than regular white guys."

Too bad she wasn't teaching reading comprehension.

#25 | Posted by Danforth

Obama picked her based on race and gender, any other nomane who said what she did would be history, tell me a white guy could get away with saying the exact same thing. The White guy always makes better decisions yea right he would last 10 seconds after such a racist comment and both you and danni know it...

We need to rid ourselves of the evil two, but it must be done in phases...a mass switch from the two parties to a third would destroy this nation. However, if moderates from both parties slowly began switching their party affiliation to a neutral third party, we could have a viable third option within 10 years.

Letterman - CRASS not class.

Too bad she wasn't teaching reading comprehension.

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2009

yeah well heres hoping that the police dont illegally invade your house and plant some coke somewhere along with child porn and maybe a needle or two and then when you get your case in front of the court and she votes..remember
when it comes to the police according to the VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES...she will have thir back and support them...

I didnt say this,..the VICE PRESIDENT of the US did.


"I wish the country would unite behind a third party and get rid of all incumbents..."

That is an idea lacking a thought.

#26 | Posted by danni

If we view American history it has shown that 3rd party voting, while not having the effect of elevating the status of 3rd parties to power; has influenced the 2 major parties. The 'esteemed' Eugene Debbs and his Communist party's gradual growth in influence likely had an impact on the decisions that, say, FDR made in regards to policy - placate some of these dissidents in liue of losing power.

I think a similar message can be sent today:

Quit spending more than revenues allow!

"tell me a white guy could get away with saying the exact same thing."

Alito did.

"The White guy always makes better decisions yea right he would last 10 seconds after such a racist comment and both you and danni know it..."

And Sotomayor didn't make that claim, and you don't know it. Therein lies the "reading comprehension" remark.

what she is really saying is that a third party might keep the dems from thier 'annoited' role in running things right into the toilet...like they are doing now.

#30 | Posted by afkabl2

It's only 12:30 and the first dead balls acurate award goes to AFKABL2. Democrats will alway support partisan politics and defend fellow democrats no matter how badly they are screwing up this country...

Letterman - CRASS not class.

#35 | Posted by MSgt at 2009-06

YOU GOT THAT RIGHT..

and last night on greta, she even asked if he had a problem with women.....
I didnt watch much anyway since he hasnt been funny in a while but this sealed the deal...
I just wont watch him again because of bullshit like this....completely out of bounds comment

and for those who dont know...here is the clip

www.thefoxnation.com

And Sotomayor didn't make that claim, and you don't know it. Therein lies the "reading comprehension" remark.

#38 | Posted by Danforth

OH PLEEEEASE then why did she AND BARRY BOTH defend the comment that did not exsist...

anbd here is another example of libs getting away with ANYTHING they want as long as its against the right and not someone annoited by the STATE RUN MEDIA

and why does DL have the time to be on with mahr
because his show on cNN lasted less than a year because even THAT audinence wouldnt watch the mean and vile lies that were broadcast on that show.

newsbusters.org

OH PLEEEEASE then why did she AND BARRY BOTH defend the comment that did not exsist...

#41 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Maybe it would help if you looked up the actual quote. Just sayin'.

"...then why did she AND BARRY BOTH defend the comment that did not exsist.."

To placate mouth-foamers like you.

And Sotomayor didn't make that claim, and you don't know it. Therein lies the "reading comprehension" remark.

#38 | Posted by Danforth

OH PLEEEEASE then why did she AND BARRY BOTH defend the comment that did not exsist...

#41 | Posted by ATaxpayer at 2009-06-

STAY ON it my friend...dont let him get away with any of those comments...lol

Maybe it would help if you looked up the actual quote. Just sayin'.

#43 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue at 2009-

well I will say this.
if you want to find her comments on this you have a lot more places to look than just the one from 2003 at berkely

lets see...2001 at seton hall
once in 1999 and another in 1994,

GEE....SO many times that she "mispoke'....
huh?

"dont let him get away with any of those comments"

Read the entire speeches, not just one sentence.

So let me get this straight both SanAntonioRogue and Danforth are claiming that she NEVER made the comment That Latino women make better decions. Oh come on it was all over the news...

"So let me get this straight both SanAntonioRogue and Danforth are claiming that she NEVER made the comment That Latino women make better decions."

Post the entire, actual quote, and we'll talk.

So let me get this straight both SanAntonioRogue and Danforth are claiming that she NEVER made the comment

#48 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Not surprisingly, the point zooms just over your head and falls harmlessly to the ground.

Look up the actual quote and you'll find it is NOT what you claim it is. So either you are misinformed, or deliberately incorrectly paraphrasing her to suit your purpose.

Which?

tax..
see what they are both doing to you.
they are TRYING anyway to make you look wrong with defense of her comment somehow being taken out of context when they both know good and well that this is EXACTLY what she said and APPARENTLY meant since she said it at least four times that we know

and the ABSOLUTE PROOF?

all you need to know is that LEAHY has said hearings will start in july

IN OTHER WORDS Get it done AS FAST AS YOU CAN....

STAY ON it my friend...dont let him get away with any of those comments...lol

#45 | Posted by afkabl2

Thanks bro but one question how in the hell can you argue with liberals who just MAKE SHIT UP AS THEY GO ALONG, I mean it's fucking unbelivable she clearly made these documented statements and that is an absolute fact just like gravity works well maybe not in Washigton but everywhere else...

see there..

NOW SA has chimed in

thier goal is to make you look stupid and thus turn the attack away from this racist woman and onto you.
I am sure you are very much aware of everything I am saying but the rest of the world may not be aware that THIS is the exact attack plan dems have and use with thier state run media...

they are TRYING anyway to make you look wrong with defense of her comment somehow being taken out of context when they both know good and well that this is EXACTLY what she said and APPARENTLY meant since she said it at least four times that we know

#51 | Posted by afkabl2

Gotta love a guy who thinks he can just lie and lie and not be called out for it. That's our Ish.

Thanks bro but one question how in the hell can you argue with liberals who just MAKE SHIT UP AS THEY GO ALONG, I mean it's fucking unbelivable she clearly made these documented statements...

#52 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Why won't you look up the quote? She didn't say what you said she did.

So again, are you misinformed, or are you a liar?

"thier goal is to make you look stupid"

Easier than you think.

"and thus turn the attack away from this racist woman and onto you."

People who purposefully misrepresent what others have said for partisan purposes deserve to be called out.

tax..
see what they are both doing to you.
they are TRYING anyway to make you look wrong with defense of her comment somehow being taken out of context...

#51 | Posted by afkabl2

That is exactly what is going on here her comments are not defendable so liberals must bend and twist the FACTS to get the outcome they desire HOW FUCKING PATHETIC is that ...

Letterman - CRASS not class. -- #40 | Posted by afkabl2

According to comments under the video, the story is even worse than what Fox reported. Since Bristol Palin wasn't at the ball game, Letterman must have been referring to 14-year-old Willow.

From latest jobs report...

Hours worked per week dropped...

"If firms were really gearing up to start hiring workers once again, why would they now be cutting back as strongly as ever on the hours that they ask their existing employees to work?"
www.businessinsider.com

"she clearly made these documented statements"

Post the speech.

Not a sentence, or a phrase, but the entire speech.

People who purposefully misrepresent what others have said for partisan purposes deserve to be called out.

#56 | Posted by Danforth

And SIR YOU are being called disingeniOus and being called out at the same time...

COMPLAINT DEPARTMENT MEMO

now I dont like to complain to the goDfather and all about the dump system because, straingely, I agree with it and think its pretty fair

HOWEVER>..the other day I got dumped and notified that it was because IN MAKING A POINT To an dippy poster who called liz cheney a "fat ugly bitch" I used the "N" word in wondering about when the post about michelle will be out and that WAS DUMPED..
and THATS OKAY.....

but lets look at a post from yesterdays nooner which apparently WASNT DUMPED

Q: What would you call the Flintstone's if they were black?

A: Niggers

#81 | Posted by valkyriemissile at 2009-06-09 03:55 PM | Rep

so the question is..was I dumped because "MICHELLE" was involved EVEN indirectly ?
or is it BIAS on the part of the dumper.......and its okay to use the "N" word as long as its in a joke rather than making a point about bias and bigotry of retort posters??

HHHHHHHMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm

"liberals must bend and twist the FACTS"

Post the facts. Go ahead. Stop with all the bluster and post the entire speech.

thier goal is to make you look stupid"

Easier than you think.

"and thus turn the attack away from this racist woman and onto you."

People who purposefully misrepresent what others have said for partisan purposes deserve to be called out.

#56 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-06-10 12:50 PM | Reply |

this shows you how good this poster is.

he can tell you that you are stupid by telling you that you are stupid...others here arent near this good at it...lol

And SIR YOU are being called disingeniOus and being called out at the same time...

#61 | Posted by ATaxpayer

No, both of us have called YOU out. LOOK UP THE QUOTE and post it accurately or STFU.

AHhaha...

I am calling out both of YOU to prove to everyone she never said the remark in QUestion. Also please LINK...

-was I dumped because of

General principle.

Perhaps the other posts wasn't flagged?

#62 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-06-10 12:52 PM | Reply

Stop spamming, rtard.

STFU.

#65 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Translation he can not prove The claim, she never made the comment...

Baby Taxman at 2 mos - 14 lbs, 15 oz; 23.5 inches long.

I am thinking Left Tackle is in his future.

I am calling out both of YOU to prove to everyone she never said the remark in QUestion. Also please LINK...

#66 | Posted by ATaxpayer

You have shown yourself to be many things on this blog, but until now I didn't think a coward was one of them

YOU posted the original misquote trying to prove your pretty little point. Have the guts to man up and correct your error.

"I am calling out both of YOU to prove to everyone she never said the remark in QUestion"

Sorry, it doesn't work that way. First, you can't prove a negative, and second, you were the one making the claim. Post the entire speech where you think she made a racist statement, or STFU.

Translation he can not prove The claim, she never made the comment...

#69 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Never said that.

People who purposefully misrepresent what others have said for partisan purposes deserve to be called out.

Tick TOC Tick TOC

Are you both having trouble proving she never made the comment, Yea the nomination process should go about the same way...

I have clothes that old.

that I still wear
#7 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-06-10 12:08 PM | Reply | Flag

Shhhhocking.

Stop spamming, rtard.

#68 | Posted by nullifidian at

spamming?

what the fuck are you smoking now?

OH I KNOW...posters here on the right arent supposed to be armed with so many links and facts and bring up so much bullshit from the left and its state run media

I get it now...

Baby Taxman at 2 mos - 14 lbs, 15 oz; 23.5 inches long.

I am thinking Left Tackle is in his future.

#70 | Posted by taxman

Growing like a weed.

Perhaps the other posts wasn't flagged?

#67 | Posted by Corky at 2009-06

I guess not...as I said...I think the policy of the three times and then done away with if you are a good little boy for awhile..

so then My question is that the poster who flagged my comment apparently thinks that the joke is okay

This is one of the most boring posting days at the Retort I have yet seen. Is anyone witty today or is it mid-week blahs?

Post the entire speech where you think she made a racist statement, or STFU.

#72 | Posted by Danforth

Both of you have failed to answer why Obama would defend a comment that was never made in the first place. So far the most intelligent comment made by the two of you is STFU how sad is that, a mind is a terrible thing to waste...

TAX

HERE IS ANOTHER case of me posting something that was soundly attacked by sa ROUge himslef I believe or at least questioned

the other day I mentioned that obama COULD try and tax health care benefits after ATTACKING mccain and people here as well..for the very same thing

well SA or another said that he didnt say he WOULD Do that

WELL guess what boys and girls

SEnATOR grassly from montanna I believe

LEGISLATION TO TAX HEALTH CARE BENEFITS......

the first dead balls acurate award goes to AFKABL2

Dead balls I believe.

Daed balls accurate....eh not so much.

"Dead" damn^

clinic gives away free abortions in honor of tiller the baby killer:

townhall.com

our nation is ripe for judgment.

This is one of the most boring posting days at the Retort I have yet seen. Is anyone witty today or is it mid-week blahs?

#79 | Posted by Diablo at 2009

well it is hump day and I have been so preoccupied with taking SA and dannyboy to the 'cleaners' that I havent had a chance to be my usual witty self yet

Dead balls I believe.

Daed balls accurate....eh not so much.

#82 | Posted by 726 at 2009-06-10 01:04 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

"Dead" damn^

#83 | Posted by 726 at 2009

I THINK I speak for all of us here at this time when i say

HUH???

This is one of the most boring posting days at the Retort I have yet seen. Is anyone witty today or is it mid-week blahs? -- #79 | Posted by Diablo

You couldn't try to buck the trend?

our nation is ripe for judgment.

#84 | Posted by nanc at 2009-06-10 01:05 PM

You better sell all your belongings and line up for the rapture then.


This is one of the most boring posting days at the Retort I have yet seen. Is anyone witty today or is it mid-week blahs?

#79 | Posted by Diablo at 2009-06-10 01:01 PM |

Total mid-week blahs. I just want to crawl back in bed.

"I THINK I speak for all of us here"

#86 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-06-10 01:06 PM | Reply | Flag: error

I THINK I speak for all of us here at this time when i say

HUH???

#86 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-06-10 01:06 PM | Reply

You don't thankfully.

so then My question is that the poster who flagged my comment apparently thinks that the joke is okay

#78 | Posted by afkabl2

Don't feel bad I got suspeded for two weeks for posting ACORN on four diferant threads. I thought it was funny as a liberal poster posted AFLAC on every thread he was never even flagged there are two sets of rules just like our congress is right now...

and I will tell you this too...diablo

I have the idea that this would be one of those days that we could all actually co-exist together in person.
of course it would have to be at a bar and danforth could by buying the next round for all of us since he is independantly wealthy

and I would promise to TRY ANd not kick nullifans ass out the door...(im joking asswipe)

Hello everyone....

Just checked in to see how you liberal pussies are doing!!

I see nothing has changed...

#10 | Posted by boaz

Hey there Boaz---How is it going? Are you still over there?

Stay safe. Obama is sending over the troops--so should be some help.

well shit

publishers clearing house AGAIN has sent me a message telling me that I MAY have won a million bucks..guess I had better get to them so I can collect in by the end of the week.

anyone else have that problem?

#88 | Posted by 726

you can have my belongings.

"Hello everyone....
Just checked in to see how you liberal pussies are doing!!
I see nothing has changed...
#10 | Posted by boaz"

Hey! How's it going? Always good to hear from one of the conservative pussies!

Both of you have failed to answer why Obama would defend a comment that was never made in the first place.

#80 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Still too frightened to look up what she really said and quote it accurately? Or do you already know and are embarrassed for getting called out on your lie?

but lets look at a post from yesterdays nooner which apparently WASNT DUMPED

Q: What would you call the Flintstone's if they were black?

A: Niggers

#81 | Posted by valkyriemissile at 2009-06-09 03:55 PM | Rep

so the question is..was I dumped because "MICHELLE" was involved EVEN indirectly ?
or is it BIAS on the part of the dumper.......and its okay to use the "N" word as long as its in a joke rather than making a point about bias and bigotry of retort posters??

NO

"valkyriemissle" is obviously one of RCADES aliases here.

Hasta Laredo my check is in the mail too...

Mayby by Tommorow Danforth and Sanatonio will have a reason for Obama defending a comment that NEVER happened in the first place, naaa they will just bullshit their way through again...

LOL...

"Where the hell is Joe Biden?

#6 | Posted by wisgod"

In the bunker, checking out all the S&M/Bondage porn Cheney left behind.

This is one of the most boring posting days at the Retort I have yet seen. Is anyone witty today or is it mid-week blahs?

#79 | Posted by Diablo

Knock, knock?

SEnATOR grassly from montanna I believe

#81 | Posted by afkabl2

LOL! Ish draws on his vast reservoir of knowledge, once again proving his mettle.

Mayby by Tommorow Danforth and Sanatonio will have a reason for Obama defending a comment that NEVER happened in the first place, naaa they will just bullshit their way through again...

LOL...

#100 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Pitiful.

"you can have my belongings.

#96 | Posted by nanc"

Ewww! images.dailytech.com

Hasta Laredo my check is in the mail too...

#100 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Don't forget to stock up on your straw men arguments, dishonest misquotes, and faux outrage!

Some Democrats and political analysts are urging the White House to shift course and concede that Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor made an error when she suggested in 2001 that Hispanic women would make better judges than white men.

www.politico.com

...

The above is an example of a non racial comment...

www.politico.com

...

#107 | Posted by ATaxpayer

And yet, unsurprisingly, you STILL refuse to post her actual quote because you KNOW she didn't say what you said she did.

#106 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

You know if we were both in a bar just talking shop and Danforth was buying the beer uhhh never mind we would still be arguing and both of you would still be telling the rest of us the sun rises in the west...

Here is the quote from the Politico site.

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

She said that a Latina woman's life has more valid experiences in making legal judgments than a While Male's due to the quality of their lives. Justices were passed over for less in the past. If there is a better candidate, it is time to find them.

RCP Poll
President Obama Job Approval
RCP Average: +25.7% Details
Approve 59.6%
Disapprove 33.9%

But don't worry, the libs tell me the "Egypt Speech" will be kickin' in any moment.

Bwah Haaaaah .

Letterman stopped being funny years ago. Nowadays he reminds me of that Onion article:

MARILYN MANSON NOW GOING DOOR TO DOOR TRYING TO SHOCK PEOPLE

Dave - it was really a cheap shot.

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Is this a big deal? Some argue that if a white man had said the same thing about being a white man, he would be forced to withdraw his nomination.

www.rightpundits.com

Here you go Sanatonio and Danforth please tell me a white guy could say the exact same thing and not be immidiatly disqulified...

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

I would totally agree with this statement if was a decision involving toilet bowl cleanser.

#111 | Posted by kanrei

Ah Kan, we were trying to get him to be man enough to clean up his own mess.

#116 - FF for STIR.

"Latina woman with the richness of her experiences"

So what you are actually saying is it would be impossible for a "WHITE MALE" to have "richness of her experiences" What if the "WHITE MALE" was raised as a female in a Latino household in the ghetto would you feel better about his decision making process then...

This smacks of racial profiling no matter how much bullshit Sanatonio and Danforth cover it with...

This smacks of racial profiling

Did you read her whole speech?

She said that a Latina woman's life has more valid experiences in making legal judgments than a While Male's due to the quality of their lives. Justices were passed over for less in the past. If there is a better candidate, it is time to find them.

#112 | Posted by kanrei

I completely disagree. I believe he was talking about experience and how someone with certain life experiences could make better decisions that someone without those experiences.

I think it was poorly said, but I don't think it was in any way intended as racist.

Did you read her whole speech?

#120 | Posted by 726

Did you read his whole post?

So what you are actually saying is it would be impossible for a "WHITE MALE" to have "richness of her experiences"

#119 | Posted by ATaxpayer

You're getting that straw man thing down pat.

Ah Kan, we were trying to get him to be man enough to clean up his own mess.

#117 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

I posted her exact quote for both Sanatonio and Danforth to defend Thanks kanrei for your effort. Now as for being a man why don't the two of you explain how this "EXACT" quote is not racial profiling, and please be a MAN about it...

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a twelve year old white male who hasn't lived that life."

Because so far your best argument has been STFU brilliant just fucking brilliant...

This smacks of racial profiling no matter how much bullshit Sanatonio and Danforth cover it with...

#119 | Posted by ATaxpayer

At least we were honest enough to expect an accurate quote to be the starting point of the discussion, instead of trying to pass off some disingenuous misquote.

I am going to repeat my conclusion because I feel it was passed over since I linked it with the quote.

Justices were passed over for less in the past. If there is a better candidate, it is time to find them.

I posted her exact quote for both Sanatonio and Danforth to defend Thanks kanrei for your effort. Now as for being a man why don't the two of you explain how this "EXACT" quote is not racial profiling, and please be a MAN about it...

#124 | Posted by ATaxpayer

After being asked for an hour, and after someone else does it for you?

Good one.

The thing is, and we have forgotten it in this era of partisan hackery, but Supreme Court Justices are supposed to avoid not only impropriety, but the appearance of impropriety. It really honestly doesn't matter what she intended to say: if what she said is causing this much drama, then it is time for a new candidate.

Justices were passed over for less in the past. If there is a better candidate, it is time to find them.

#128 | Posted by kanrei

Funny that there was no hue and cry when Alito talked about how HIS experiences impacted his judgment and decision making.

"If there is a better candidate, it is time to find them."

If.

There are plenty of better candidates. Richard Posner, for one.

It really honestly doesn't matter what she intended to say: if what she said is causing this much drama, then it is time for a new candidate.

#130 | Posted by kanrei

I think it is important to more closely examine among WHOM this is causing such "drama".

Funny that there was no hue and cry when Alito talked about how HIS experiences impacted his judgment and decision making.


I don't remember the quotes, but did he say is experiences impaced his judgement, or did he say his experiences made him a better judge than a white or black person would be? There is a light-year of difference between the two statements.

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

A teacher in a Basics of Writing class would explain the first part of the sentence is where the speaker lays out his or her theme. Here, she's talking about her hopes. Not beliefs, hopes.

#119 | Posted by ATaxpayer

At least we were honest enough to expect an accurate quote to be the starting point of the discussion, instead of trying to pass off some disingenuous misquote.

#127 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

LOL LOL you have to be joking are the two of you drinking already or maybe something else it must be some really good shit to come up with such a lame post for your response to my inquiry. I am SURE neither of you have heard the exact quote until kanrei posted it just prior to my post. I can see both of you are just playing games with symantics and have little or no cranial capacity, again your best argument so far has been " STFU WAAAAA atax called us both out and we stepped on our DICKS " not to worry I will buy both of you partisan hacks two little tiny bandaids...

I think it is important to more closely examine among WHOM this is causing such "drama".

I don't WHO is as important when it comes to SC Justices as How Many. The SCOTUS is supposed to be non-partisan and beholden to nobody, so the political affiliation of those complaining does not mean as much as the percent of the nation complaining...which, in this case I do not know.

Kan,

I haven't followed this nomination as I've viewed it as a foregone conclusion.

I don't know much about her.

However, what I HAVE been exposed to is, to say the least, concerning. Between comments that can easily be construed as racist, to some writings that make Moneywar seem like Shakespeare by comparison.

I have doubts that she is the most qualified available candidate for the position.

"Litigation commonly involves persons at different social distances form the judge, and the more proximate will garner the more sympathetic response regardless of actual desert."

-Richard Posner

Like I said, based on what I am reading, if there is a better candidate, time to find them. The last thing the SCOTUS needs is another partisan Judge. 5-4 has been the status quo for far too long.

Ah yes, Mr Independant Danforth weighs in.

I am SURE neither of you have heard the exact quote until kanrei posted it just prior to my post.

#136 | Posted by ATaxpayer

You have GOT to be kidding, right? This has been in the news since she was nominated, and discussed on multiple threads.

YOU appear to be the only one who didn't know the actual quote. Maybe that's why you attempted to get away with "Latino women always make better decisions than regular white guys."

I can't support anyone named "Posner" because I had a computer teacher named Posner who failed me simply because he hated long hairs. No long hair ever passed his class. Different guy I know, but the name brings back bad memories 20 years later.

#139 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue at 2009-06-10 01:57 PM

Saying you will reach a "better decision" because of your own race is different from admitting that judges tend to be sympathetic toward persons with whom they can relate. Try again.

Funny that there was no hue and cry when Alito talked about how HIS experiences impacted his judgment and decision making.

#131 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Please point out when either Alito himself, or his supporters, expressed or implied hope that his 'white-maleness' would provide a background conducive to a superior ability to interpret legal texts.

Maybe that's why you attempted to get away with "Latino women always make better decisions than regular white guys."


She didn't say "always," but she does infer that, in her opinion, Latina women possess the capacity to make better judgments than White men. To say any race is capable of better choices than another is racist...period.

Saying you will reach a "better decision" because of your own race is different from admitting that judges tend to be sympathetic toward persons with whom they can relate. Try again.

#144 | Posted by JOE

I see. So we excuse a particular bias in the candidate we like, but it is a fatal flaw in the candidate we don't like.

She showed a lack of Supreme Court judgment by making any such statement in regards to Latina, Whites, males, or females. The court should be blind, that is why Lady Liberty wears the blindfold.

I never said that comment was a "fatal flaw" with regard to Sotomayor. I simply said there are better candidates out there. Pull your head from your ass.

The bottom line is she will be confirmed so this is all really academic, that being said it would be nice if she just admitted hey that didn't sound quite right or I should have chosen a better analogy. I think it's very possible she made a racial comparison as a qualifier without actually being a racist. That is why both her and Obama tried to clarify her remarks in which case it was just a very poor choice of words

As for Sanatonio I had better things to do than jump when you barked, I posted the "EXACT QUOTE" when I had time as I knew damn good and well both you and Danforth already had them

And I still think your best argument so far has been "STFU WAAAAA" lol lol lol...

Now that both of you are wearing your butts for hats I bid you adue...

As for Sanatonio I had better things to do than jump when you barked, I posted the "EXACT QUOTE" when I had time as I knew damn good and well both you and Danforth already had them

#150 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Buttttt... you had plenty of time to respond time after time WITHOUT the quote.

And if you "knew damn good and well" I already knew the accurate quote, why did you just a couple of minutes ago say "I am SURE neither of you have heard the exact quote until kanrei posted it just prior to my post."

Is the truth THAT big of a stretch for you?

PayGo Fiasco
Eric Burton

So, have you heard of "PayGo?" No, that is not the name of some Pagan God or even the newest character in the Pokmon arsenal it is the latest incarnation of the incongruent schizophrenia of the Obama administration. The President explained it like this, "if Congress spends a dollar they have to save a dollar."

Of course the President qualified this latest iteration of fiscal responsibility only after polling was released showing that his administration was failing when it came to economic policies. Pay-as-you-go was a popular theme during the run-up to the election but it mysteriously vanished after Obama's inauguration. What we have seen since is an explosion in government and budgets and deficits that only a demented proud mother of a dysfunctional robber baron could be proud of.

This latest manifestation of Obamanomics rears its ugly head as they attempt to add to the discussion the topic of "pay-as-you-go" on the heels of the rhetoric regarding ramping up the spending of stimulus money Monday. I'm not sure who the bigger fool is, the American people if they buy this line of crap or the Obama administration for slinging this slop in the first place. Isn't the cry to shut the barn door a bit disingenuous at this point since the horse is already a mile down the road? Current spending and projected budgets negate any hope of a pay-as-you-go philosophy therefore one can only conclude that this is nothing more than a lie meant to placate the electorate.

so, now the tax increases will start

Ah yes, Mr Independant Danforth weighs in.

#141 | Posted by 101Chairborne

Danforth WHO: he weighed in just long enough for Sanatonio to be called out and then hauled ass, gee what a backup glad he is on your side Sanantonio...


LOL LOL you have to be joking are the two of you drinking already or maybe something else it must be some really good shit to come up with such a lame post for your response to my inquiry. I am SURE neither of you have heard the exact quote until kanrei posted it just prior to my post. I can see both of you are just playing games with symantics and have little or no cranial capacity, again your best argument so far has been " STFU WAAAAA atax called us both out and we stepped on our DICKS " not to worry I will buy both of you partisan hacks two little tiny bandaids...

See you tommorow boys...

Overnight and into this morning, oil futures surged to over 71 dollars a barrel.

it has doubled under his watch and what is he going to do about it? i mean the oil companies are just hosing us. when is the media attack going to begin? i want answers, how much money is O getting to let this happen to us?

So you said it again...

In one post: "I am SURE neither of you have heard the exact quote until kanrei posted it just prior to my post."

And in another: "I posted the 'EXACT QUOTE' when I had time as I knew damn good and well both you and Danforth already had them."

I guess once you get started lying its hard to keep your story straight, huh?

And if you "knew damn good and well" I already knew the accurate quote, why did you just a couple of minutes ago say "I am SURE neither of you have heard the exact quote until kanrei posted it just prior to my post."

Is the truth THAT big of a stretch for you?

#152 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

It's called Sarcasim possibly you may have heard of it, please note the word "SURE" was highligted, that would have been the first clue for most people. Your reading comprehension is not my fault...

Well now I am finished with these two...

Nothing personal Sanatonio everyone gets called out and it was just your turn...

BWAHAHAHA LOL LOL...

and please quit making me come back for trivial pesky little comments...

Well now I am finished with these two...

#158 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Now THAT was the funniest thing you've said in a long time.

and please quit making me come back for trivial pesky little comments...

#159 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Finally! Some honesty from you. You LURK after you say you're leaving to see if anyone talks about you.

: )

"So let me get this straight both SanAntonioRogue and Danforth are claiming that she NEVER made the comment That Latino women make better decions. Oh come on it was all over the news..." #48 | Posted by ATaxpayer

Not on MSNBC's Olbermann, Shuster, Matthews or Maddow.

Finally! Some honesty from you. You LURK after you say you're leaving to see if anyone talks about you.

: )

#160 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Very good grasshopper, I also enjoy the mental joust I find it boring to always talk with people of the same opinion despite my antics. I have respect for everyone on this site even danni who gives me an Excedrin headache but holds fast to her points of view. Live well we can argue some more later lol lol :)

...

"There are plenty of better candidates. Richard Posner, for one.

#132 | Posted by JOE"

Yes, PLEASE give us another white male law & economics adherent from Chicago. The Court so lacks that point of view.

"Ah yes, Mr Independant Danforth weighs in."

It's a question of reading basics. The woman is speaking of her hopes, and those who would flunk the basics of writing are now passing judgement, based on a misinterpretation of the actual words.

But, being a smart guy you knew that, didn't you?

ACLU wish to destroy a 'cross' but not succeeding...
worldnetdaily.com

Sanan asks, "Is the truth THAT big of a stretch for you?"

How about you, Mr. Leftist Honesty?

Did the quote he provided, when he did, support his point?

Of course, it did! But, you will make me the subject of your rote-like effort to defame anyone who rationally supports their contention(s) ...

... just another typical, snarling yellow-dog-democrat attack puppy who can't make it on Kos ...

Yeah, why take a guy who was first in his class at Harvard Law and one of the most accomplished and respected legal minds in the country? The first paragraph of his wikipedia article tells me all I need to know.

-Montecore

Did the quote he provided, when he did, support his point?

#166 | Posted by tadowe

No, actually I don't believe it did, or does. But thanks for checking in.

Sanan misdirects, "No, actually I don't believe it did, or does. But thanks for checking in."

Anyone can see this is BS! Otherwise, you would describe how inefficient the quote was in confirming the poster's point ...

You are so easy, Sanan, because you can NEVER rebut the contention, except to make the messenger your subject to defame ...

What an obvious stooge yellow-dog you make of yourself!

Sanan misdirects, "No, actually I don't believe it did, or does. But thanks for checking in."

Anyone can see this is BS! Otherwise, you would describe how inefficient the quote was in confirming the poster's point ...

#169 | Posted by tadowe

No Tad, an expression of my opinion is not a misdirection.

Sanan confesses, "No Tad, an expression of my opinion is not a misdirection."

It is an unsupported 'opinion' against one which has been so supported by the quote you refuse to rebut, on point.

Anyone with normal intelligence can tell that your effort is to misdirect that by accusing the messenger of being tardy to your leftish demands ...

... and that makes you an obvious leftish stooge ...

You provide the support for that, my opinion ... your examples in response, right here and now!

That's why you are so easy, and a definite negative in your efforts to defame the messenger in support of party over reason ... creep ...

#171 | Posted by tadowe

Sorry Tad. You're going to have to go elsewhere to get your engines all revved up today.

SA, you tease!!

; )

And I think he was about to come, too.

"Yeah, why take a guy who was first in his class at Harvard Law and one of the most accomplished and respected legal minds in the country?

#167 | Posted by JOE"

Um, because he's already serving as the President of the United States?

By the way, Lil' Joe, I didn't need to go to Wikipedia to learn who Posner was. If you went to law school like you claim, you might have figured that out on your own. He's not exactly an obscure figure, dumbass. Oh yeah, and if you carefully analyze my post (fuck, actually if you just plain read the fucking thing), you would seee that I was not criticizing Posner's qualifications, just pointing out that his point of view is already well-represented on the court.

ChairPuddle,

Your 660th line of bullshit had nothing to do with my not posting here anymore. I'd talked to several posters here offline over the last few weeks about hanging it up because of morons like you who live on the Comments Button and troll 'cause they don't have anything better to do. I'd no more continue hanging around drunk assholes like you IRL than I will here anymore.

I posted links about Korea that made you look like a fool, so you move onto BS line XXXX. That's your MO when you're made a fool of (not hard to do, and would have happened more if I'd been so inclined).

I hung on the Site Meter for an hour today. Counted over 10 separate IP's from Nashville proper - over 30 from the metro area. Your latest in an endless line of BS was just a feeble attempt to change the topic because you were made to look like the idiot you are. I don't give a flying fuck what you think 40 year old child Fake Paratrooper. I know who you are.

You're dying for attention. Have at it. Spending time trying to post on topic around here is a waste of time.

Hey AU - are you pulling a Goatman? You know, saying you're leaving, but then coming back? (Actually, in Goatman's case, creating an entire thread to the fact that you are leaving, before slinking back.)

AmericanFavre.

AmericanVorhees
lacryptedelaterreur.com(6).jpg

I just saw Michelle Obama on the cover of someone's TIME magazine.

No surprise that they are sucking the Obamas' asses at TIME magazine, as usual.

But the surprise is the cover picture shows her with a relatively pleasant look on her face.

They must have shot her for about 3 days before they came up with something that didn't look like a constipated ape.

#181
ouch!

Laura Bush's eyes were too far apart.

Ezra Nawi is one of Israel's most courageous human rights activists and without your help, he will likely go to jail in less than 30 days.

His crime? He tried to stop a military bulldozer from destroying the homes of Palestinian Bedouins in the South Hebron region. These homes and the families who live in them have been under Israeli occupation for 42 years. They still live without electricity, running water and other basic services. They are continuously harassed by Jewish settlers and the military.

He is loved by those with little power, to whom he dedicates his life, and hated by the Jewish settlers, military and police.

Now that you know Ezra, you have a chance to stand up for him, and for everything that he represents.
Especially now, as Israel escalates its crackdown on human rights and pro-democracy activists.

He needs you. His friends need you. Those he helps every day need you. So please send a letter to the Consulate, to the media, to your family and friends.

Take just a moment to write your letter. Do it now. And then share his name with a friend. Do it for Ezra Nawi.

salsa.democracyinaction.org

Laura Bush's eyes were too far apart.

#182 | Posted by bruceaz

some people find that sexy - although when Laura was FLOTUS she had a bit of an age disadvantage if you are going to compare her to certain other FLOTUSes

McCains wife would have been a sorta hot FLOTUS.
but that whacky Denis Kucinich, he would have had the hottest FLOTUS to date

#183 | Posted by nutcase at 2009-06-10 06:18 PM | Reply | Flag: Offensive SPAM

needs to be repeated so OBama can do the left thang:>)

Ezra Nawi is one of Israel's most courageous human rights activists and without your help, he will likely go to jail in less than 30 days.

His crime? He tried to stop a military bulldozer from destroying the homes of Palestinian Bedouins in the South Hebron region. These homes and the families who live in them have been under Israeli occupation for 42 years. They still live without electricity, running water and other basic services. They are continuously harassed by Jewish settlers and the military.

He is loved by those with little power, to whom he dedicates his life, and hated by the Jewish settlers, military and police.

Now that you know Ezra, you have a chance to stand up for him, and for everything that he represents.
Especially now, as Israel escalates its crackdown on human rights and pro-democracy activists.

He needs you. His friends need you. Those he helps every day need you. So please send a letter to the Consulate, to the media, to your family and friends.

Take just a moment to write your letter. Do it now. And then share his name with a friend. Do it for Ezra Nawi.

salsa.democracyinaction.org

#183 | Posted by nutcase

#186 | Posted by Bani at 2009-06-10 06:27 PM | Reply | Flag: Terrorist SPAM

well, Bob Dole grew up with my dad & I was in Israel at the Western Wall the morning after Sharon went to pray ~ thus inciting mini-ww3:>)

Laura Bush's eyes were too far apart.

#182 | Posted by bruceaz

If you want to compare Laura's looks to Michelle's, I suggest a visit to the nearest Eye Care Optical. I hear they are running a 2-for 1 special. Put both pairs on and get back to us.

Actually,I like my foggy near sighted world,unless I'm driving

Laura Bush's eyes were too far apart

Maybe that's why Laura couldn't see the stop sign she blew through on her way to killing the dude that dumped her.

"WASHINGTON A frustrated artist and an angry man, the suspect in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting once tried to kidnap members of the Federal Reserve board"

Anybody seen Ray?

Actually,I like my foggy near sighted world,unless I'm driving

#190 | Posted by bruceaz

Typical Lib.

#193

OK good one

Fuck you=Live long and prosper

Anybody seen Ray?

#192 | Posted by nullifidian

ff

"Danforth WHO: he weighed in just long enough for Sanatonio to be called out and then hauled ass"

Well, besides being in tech rehearsal for a show that opens tomorrow night, you had you ass handed to you and still insisted on barfing up the lie; I didn't feel it necessary to pile on. Freshman Reading and Writing 101 (HS, not college) proves you wrong. To continue pretending you're correct is to parade your ignorance.

Dave - it was really a cheap shot.

#114 | Posted by MrFair

Yeah--a 62 year old man making a sexual joke about a 14 year old girl getting "knocked up" by another man.

What a friggin idiot.

#18 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2009-06-10 12:19 PM

price at pump up 40 cents in last MONTH

god damned obama


I'm afraid that this is unrelated to oil, but rather reflects the accelerated decline of the American dollar. What are we going to pay for oil with when the dollar is repudiated as an exchange currency? We'll need to earn some money as homeboy has ruined our credit. It reminds me of the plaint in the song, "Rufus Rastus Johnson Brown, what you gwine do when the rent come roun'?" Well, Mr. Obama been spending money like he be some kinda rich. What kinda rich be that?

Mr. Obama be spending money like he Schwarzenegger rich. Scharzenegger done spent California into oblivion. I move that Southern California be transferred to Mexican sovereignty. And send Schwarzenegger with it. He's spending like a Weimar Republic Kraut. The demographic for disposing of Mexico is right, it'll be a sort of repatriation, and the Latinos agitating for Reconquista can live in the region under Mexican governance. Unfortunately, I suspect that there still would be border crossings into the diminished Los Estados Unidos del Norte.

Para espaol presione 1. For English, press 2.

By jingo, America for the Americans, and that's the U.S. Americans.

Can we grant Chauvin honorary American citizenship? He had some good ideas.

There is supposed to be brain plasticity, so that people who engage in an activity controlled by a particular area find that it thickens as do muscles. So for example, cabbies in London have a particular uniformity due to remembering all of the streets.

Now since Sotomayor's alleged deprivation during childhood predicated on her having been raised among Puerto Ricans may have compromised development of certain areas of her brain related to intellectual activity, the question arises if someone with such limitations "feels," has empathy for other people with similar impediments to intellectual development, and further if the intellectually limited merit a representative.

I was at a Social Service Board meeting once when a blind man, who was a member advocated diversity, and demanded that a member of "the retarded community" be appointed to the board to represent the interests of retarded people. Of course, the devil is in the details. What level of retardation should be represented. Surely the more profoundly retarded should not suffer discrimination. So, the retarded would have been best represented by a drooling idiot, who could not even speak.

It is only in recent times that the quest for diversity has been considered a sufficient value to override the quest for competency. I wonder if with these standards, Sotomayor might not be the perfect candidate since she would bring such great diversity to the court, a multitude of contributions. What are they? Well, she's a woman, a Latina, has a dark complexion, is physically ugly, was raised in a project and knows street talk and street people, may be a lesbian according to some rumors which would be another asset if true, has been found to have a disagreeable personality by her judicial peers and attorneys and litigants appearing before her, is a bully, was appointed by a mulatto, and there is a list of other distinguishing attributes few or none of which would have previously be considered assets, but this is the dawn of the post-Aquarian Age, so it is time to appoint another lightweight hack incompetent with the correct ideological bent. Let's form a "Gringos for Sotomayor" committee to inundate the media and politicians offices with demands for her appointment. Oh, an afterthought. As a brittle-boned woman, she'll also be a voice for the impaired and disabled. You've heard of twofers and threefers, well she is so great a -fer that you cannot even count the ways for determining the meritorious nature of her multiple diversities.

Yeah--a 62 year old man making a sexual joke about a 14 year old girl getting "knocked up" by another man.

What a friggin idiot.

#197 | Posted by MURPHY

His tank was empty 4 years ago. He should have spent that time in a Dentist Chair fixing his buck teeth...

Oh, she's Puero Rican, so we need to use local lingo. How about "Mariposas for Sotomayor?" It's the assembly of groups with diverse but special interests to form a rainbow coalition that will bring peace and harmony to this country. And we'll all be equal. We'll have equal income, and equal intelligence, and equal physical beauty, and equal housing, and equal medical care, and ... well, we don't want to cause too great stress for white males, so we'll allow them to continue to work more.

We should have a service corps so that the children of rich Americans could receive training to enable them to experience what shapes the lives of others. There should be compulsory toilet cleaning training and performance of other maid services, and oh yes, training these privileged folk in proper deference and humility. We need to abase gringos. It isn't enough that the experiences of the maligned, the subjugated, the oppressed, the victims, set the rules. We need to have others "live the life."

Wait! There may not be a need for another government program. Obama's policies may accomplish this through freefall of the economy. Phew. Well, let's clear the appointment anyway.

Maybe the next appointee can be a white male, who has been victimized by being financially impoverished.

We can also use the derisive word that Latinos use for gringos. And no, it isn't gringos. Stay tuned. By the way, what you got to say gabacho. Since I've become an honorary minority, I ain't cuttin' you no slack.

#201 | Posted by wisgod

What is so terrible is that dickless Letterman talks about raping a 14 year old by another man and jokes about it.

He should be fired. No wonder his ratings suck.

He should be fired. No wonder his ratings suck.

#203 | Posted by MURPHY

As usual, Murph doesn't know what the fuck she's babbling about.

David Letterman, who has been quietly doing his second-place late night joker show over on CBS like forever, is all of a sudden beating the Tonight Show in the ratings. Calling Sarah Palin a slut really pays off!

It's only been a week since Conan took over Jay Leno's old gig, and he's already losing. Letterman was up 13% in the ratings this past week vs. the week before and last night he passed the Tonight Show, which has been steadily losing viewers every night since Conan started.


gawker.com

HOW ABOUT THIS FROM NEW SCIENTIST

www.newscientist.com

Gravity Can Not Be A Causal Force

Wed Jun 10 20:52:11 BST 2009 by Derek Duckitt

If gravity were a causal force the maximum speed of transmission would be the speed of light in a vacuum. This cannot be since gravity acts in a direct line between 2 objects no matter what the distance between them. For example visually the Sun appears in our sky in a position about 8.3 minutes behind where it actually is, but the direction of gravitational force is between the exact positions of the Earth and Sun at any given instant. If that were not the case Earth would orbit the point where the Sun used to be 8.3 minutes ago and therefore move away from the Sun in a spiral. Gravity is therefore an EFFECT resulting from the spacetime distortion from an object having mass. Thus it is a waste of time looking for a gravity particle, Higgs Boson or gravity waves - they do not exist

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, Miss Carrie Prejean has been dethroned as Miss California USA for "contract violations," including missing scheduled pageant events. Runner-up Tami Farrell, who was Miss Malibu, will immediately assume the Miss California USA title.

"Um, because he's already serving as the President of the United States?"

Obama was first in his class? News to me.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable