I really believe that we're going to see positive results from Obama and Clinton's diplomatic efforts. It won't happen over night because we have a long way to go, but I think she's the right person for the job.

She's been in the news a lot lately, warning NK about renewed sanctions, telling off Ajihadinsane, warning Israel about settlements.... and she has Richard Holbrooke working Afghan-Paki diplomacy and George Mitchell handling Israel-Palestine issues.

I don't think we could have a better team.... and at least now we have a team actually more interested in peace than war.

... telling off Ajihadinsane,

#2 | Posted by Corky

Interesting piece on Iran on Dateline last night. There seems to be a real chance that Ahmadinejad will lose the election, and young people seem to be rallying behind his more moderate opponent. There may be a small window of opportunity opening up here.

There may be a small window of opportunity opening up here.

I will believe it when I see it.

I will believe it when I see it.

#4 | Posted by 726

Good point. And, unlike the past several years, we'll actually have someone looking for it.

If it happens, we can party like its Nov 2008!

As Secretary of State, what else would she say? No?

As Secretary of State, what else would she say? No?

#7 | Posted by Pirate

Hillary is as good as any politician at dissembling when they don't want to answer a question directly. She was direct and unhesitating in her answer.

Hillary is as good as any politician at dissembling when they don't want to answer a question directly. She was direct and unhesitating in her answer.

----

Even if she felt otherwise, she's going to say yes.

Personally, I think the 3am ad was a desperate attempt playing on fear.

If she really felt otherwise she wouldn't have taken the job.

Never underestimate the power of the dark side.

IMO, she never believed he wouldn't pass the 3am test from the start. Her campaign was in desperation mode.

"I looked around our world and I thought, we are in just so many deep holes that everybody had better grab a shovel and start digging out."

hill, you dumb shit you - when there's a hole already, you don't keep digging - you fill it up.

this OOO has not had a 3 a.m. test and will more than likely fail when put to the test.

hill, you dumb shit you - when there's a hole already, you don't keep digging - you fill it up.

#13 | Posted by nanc

If you're in a hole that is too deep to climb out of, you have to dig out the side, and create an inclined ramp so you can get out.

THEN you fill it up.

Basic engineering 101.

this OOO has not had a 3 a.m. test and will more than likely fail when put to the test.

#13 | Posted by nanc at 2009-06-08 12:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nanc is probably right. "OOO" will probably be warned of a terrorist attack and blow it off and go fishing. He'll then hide for a day or so after the worst attack on US soil in history and let his VP take charge. Then he'll invade a country that had nothing to do with it....

Nah...that's too crazy even for NANC's imagination.

Later y'all. Good Mondays all around!

Bush failed every test put to him for 8 years.

Bush failed every test put to him for 8 years.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob

What do you mean?

He passed the test of being able to orchestrate an attack on his own country, blame it on someone else, squelch real evidence to the contrary, invade a country that didn't threaten us specifically for the purpose of driving up oil prices so he and his buddies could make a trillion dollars.

Oh, and he raped orphans in Nebraska.......

and got away with it.

:-(

eberly..that post is so full of horseshit that I bet there was less horseshit at belmont last saturday
so much that the only way I can comment on it in the time I have left is to just say one thing about it all

you suck...

okay so not the best of debating techniques but it fits.

and so how do you sleep at night with all these conspiracy theories bouncing around in your head
still think there is a monster in your closet or under your bed?

you suck...

that reminds me. Although Clinton got a blowjob in the whitehouse from an intern and it became big news very fast, GWB apparently liked to suck the dick of a whitehouse reporter.

kept that quiet also.

nobody can call that guy a failure.

It's the vast right wing conspiracy, I tell ya.

Oh, and he raped orphans in Nebraska.......

and got away with it.

:-(

#18 | Posted by eberly at 2009-06-08 01:07 PM | Reply | Flag

That was his father---but Bush jr delivered them in his plane from time to time.

#15 | Posted by BetelG

no, he'll continue kissing arses around the world in hopes they eat u.s. last.

Obama is slicker than willy.

Get your opponents on your cabinet staff and they will say anything to praise, even when they are puking.

Hillary is totally marginalized.

She has no power outside because she is inside the WH. She can't criticize.

She has limited duties since they gave Holbrook and Mithchell their duties and responsibilities--and Hillary in not included with those.

She gets NK and we see how well that is going.

Missiles and journalists getting 12 years of hard labor.

Get your opponents on your cabinet staff and they will say anything to praise, even when they are puking.

#24 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-06-08 09:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

Then they must not have much integrity. They betray their foundation because they are on OBamas pick list? These are the kind of people you want running the country? These are the kind of people you would support?

If the journalists had come home, you would have wondered how many billions it cost or what she traded. You make up things about dems and then think it is reality. It seems you do the same thing for reps who have anything good to say about a dem.

They betray their foundation because they are on OBamas pick list?

YES!
---

These are the kind of people you want running the country?

NO!

------

These are the kind of people you would support?

NO!
-------

Hillary is lying and you know it BB.

Murphy

You are delusional. Your judgement is not sound. There have been 8 years of verification for those statements.

Your anti American attacks show you consistently putting party above country. Even I supported Bush for his first year--you never supported Obama for a second. Your unreasoned hatred makes your credibility zero.

Your unreasoned hatred makes your credibility zero.

#27 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Murphy's going for Johnson'top spot again?

Ummm . . . then when was Obama awakened at 3 AM? Was it something that didn't make the papers?

Hillary is totally marginalized.

She has no power outside because she is inside the WH. She can't criticize.

She has limited duties since they gave Holbrook and Mithchell their duties and responsibilities--and Hillary in not included with those.

#24 | Posted by MURPHY

Wow, you must really think Hillary is one stupid woman, Murphy. Imagine, being completely duped like that.

Even though both of the gentlemen you mentioned report to her.

Hey hillary did obama pass the 3 am test.

what is she going to say -

"he failed miserably" ???

I also don't think he has HAD the 3 am test yet ......

What a happy feel good softball question tossed for the purpose of getting a nice stroking of obama and hillary into the papers.

the news has turned from the government's watchdog into the government's lapdog.

I never doubted, considering her husband, Hillary had plenty of 3 a.m. experiences in her life.

OK, I read the article and the back and forth BS from both nutjob sides of the left-right arguments and I am still confused by this thread.

Can someone please inform me how Obama has passed the 3AM test?

What international crisis has he faced and responded to and achieved a positive result? (please do not include Bush, Clinton or Herbert Hoover in your rationale).

Thanks!

He was found sober resting in bed at 3 a.m. That's probably better than 99% of our senators, Freddy.

He hasn't been tested by the type of situation contemplated by the "3 A.M." ad, so Stephanopolous' question was premature. Hillary could have been honest and told him so, but instead she chose to kiss her boss' ass. Guess we won't be seeing any dissent within this administration.

Obama passed a test he never took. Even as President he's benefiting from Affirmative Action!

only test that mattered to clinton was he gave her a job
jasman

Chairborne, that one made me laugh so hard I spilled my coffee. Thanks.

I've finally figured out the Obama economic strategy. President Barack Obama and his team have been having so much fun wielding dictatorial power while rescuing "failed" firms, that they have developed a scheme to gain the same power over every business. The plan is to enact policies that are so anticompetitive that every firm needs a bailout.

Once that happens, their new pay czar Kenneth Feinberg can set the wage for everybody and Rahm Emanuel can stack the boards of all of our companies with his political cronies.

I know, it sounds like an exaggeration. But look at it this way. If there were a power ranking of U.S. companies, like the ones compiled by football writers for National Football League teams, Microsoft would surely be first or second to Google. But last week, Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer came to Washington to announce what Microsoft would do if Obama's multinational tax policy is enacted.

"It makes U.S. jobs more expensive," Ballmer said, "We're better off taking lots of people and moving them out of the U.S." If Microsoft, perhaps our most competitive company, has to abandon the U.S. in order to continue to thrive, who exactly is going to stay?

iran continues developing its peaceful nuc program, which obama says is cool. nice way to end that sticky mess.

NK has taken two americans hostage as a bargaining chip, they will get what they want and O will call it a diplomatic victory.

as for the israel/palestine he is asking israel to give up something and just asking the other side to no attack them? Geez....

"HILLARY: OBAMA PSSED 3 AM TEST"

NOW KISS MY ASS, HILLARY!

What the hell is wrong with you, Oozie?

Such anger and bitterness in one so young is, well, disturbing.

SANOBAMA: The welfare check came. No wonder you are up so early.

The welfare check came.

#43 | Posted by ozzieoswald

Great! Lunch is on you then.

SANOBAMA: Since you are up so early, can you tell me why John Murtha gave a $50,000,000 contract to his son-in-laws company?

I know if Murtha was a republican you would be on it like flies on shit.

#45 | Posted by ozzieoswal| Flag: Some Help Me, Please, I Don't Know How to Post a Thread

...can you tell me why John Murtha gave a $50,000,000 contract to his son-in-laws company?

#45 | Posted by ozzieoswald

I would guess the answer is "because he could".

And, if he did, and it was illegal or unethical in any way, he should be investigated and punished to the full extent the law and/or congressional ethics rules.

Re: Murtha and many other in Congress.
I can understand Murtha wanting to grease palms with pork lard. What I really do not like is that the other members of congress vote to let him do it. Not a single one stands up on the floor and says, "Uh, Murtha? Enough is enough."

he couldn't pass a pee test.

he couldn't pass a pee test.

#49 | Posted by nanc

At least he hasn't had to run away from one, unlike his predecessor.

#49 FF for Nanc

If there was a lame retort flag, #50 would get that.

Well if Hillary say he passed thats good enough for me. Never mind the fact that 2 Americans are being held hostage in NKorea and Iran has told him to fuck off as they continue their nuke program. BHO says no problem after all they arent threating us with them.....yet.

Tell me one test this guy has taken? So far he has backed down or just been as spineless as predicted, with the exception of the auto idustry. There is an area he has been a real ball buster. But I dont think that is the 3am test that most were looking for him to throw his weight around on

That was his father---but Bush jr delivered them in his plane from time to time.

#22 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2009-06-

sometimes you guys are so fucked up with it that ..well it makes me think about not even coming here to spread my joy with you.....

well it makes me think about not even coming here to spread my joy with you.....
#54 | Posted by afkabl2 | Flag: From You Lips to Gawd's Ears

"Hillary: Obama Passed '3 A.M.' Test"

Still, Obama is the worst President since Hoover!

Still, Obama is the worst President since Hoover!

#56 | Posted by Eddie

You know, if you made that statement somewhere near the end of his first term, it could certainly be a legitimate point of discussion.

As it stands now, after 4 months, it pretty much reveals what a dim bulb you really are.

San, I was thinking the same thing.

Just yesterday, I posted a thought that after 8 years of pretty clear evidence, many Bush supporters point out that we should "let history be the judge." How come after 8 years, we have to let history be the judge, but after 4 months, so many rightwingers know _exactly_ how Obama will go down in history?

(Because he's giving debt to untold generations! Because he's weak and apologetic! Because he's a closet muslim! Because he wasn't born here!)

Still, Obama is the worst President since Hoover!

#56 | Posted by Eddie

You know, if you made that statement somewhere near the end of his first term, it could certainly be a legitimate point of discussion.

As it stands now, after 4 months, it pretty much reveals what a dim bulb you really are.

#57 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Look back at the beginning of Bush's term...

They said the exact same thing.

after 4 months, so many rightwingers know _exactly_ how Obama will go down in history?
#58 | Posted by pragmatist

2 words

Stimulus Package

LOL!!!

Even Obama is coming out and saying, "Oops"

Joe the Plumber is looking more smart every day

(Because he's giving debt to untold generations! Because he's weak and apologetic! Because he's a closet muslim! Because he wasn't born here!)

#58 | Posted by pragmatist

All true!

LOL

As it stands now, after 4 months, it pretty much reveals what a dim bulb you really are.

#57 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

I really don't understand how you can sit there and be stupid! The evidence is so clear. The overzealous Libs in Congress along with Obama have set out to get rid of the middle class in America. I resent it! They are doing this as quickly as possible because after the 2010 election, they will not be able to do it.

But, Rogue, if you agree with what they are doing is right, then you are not stupid. I respect that you want the US to be more like Europe... Socialist.

Again, Obama is the worst President since Hoover!

Look back at the beginning of Bush's term...

They said the exact same thing.

#59 | Posted by Eddie

That would be incorrect - at least for the 1st term. Some questioned the legitimacy of the election, certainly, but I don't recall anyone calling him the "worst President since..." in his first 4 months. We were kind enough to wait long enough for him to prove it.

At least extend Obama the same professional courtesy.

Rogue, do you agree that Obama is set out to "Remake America"?

Some questioned the legitimacy of the election

Yes, they do, but they are wrong and have been proven so. Give it up!

Rogue, do you see yourself as a "Progressive"?

"Some questioned the legitimacy of the election"

Yes, they do, but they are wrong and have been proven so. Give it up!

#66 | Posted by Eddie

Do you understand the basic concept of verb tense?

You've been demoted: 40w bulb -----> 25w bulb.

but I don't recall anyone calling him the "worst President since..." in his first 4 months. We were kind enough to wait long enough for him to prove it.

#64 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

How soon they forget...

DotCom bust, 9-11... Unemployment skyrocketed. MSM called him worst President since Hoover. However, Bush turned it around by cutting taxes. It worked!

Obama's a victim of himself, however. He had every chance to turn this economy around by cutting spending and taxes. Business would have responded. History tells us that.

"History tells us that."

See if your junior high school is offering a summer class in history you could take, preferably one taught by someone who knows more about history than simply spouting banalities.

MSM called him worst President since Hoover.

#68 | Posted by Eddie

Unable to differentiate between the FIRST four months of an 8 year Presidential term, and the LAST four months of an 8 year Presidential term, Eddie's meager 25 watts begins to flicker.

Obama's a victim of himself, however. He had every chance to turn this economy around by cutting spending and taxes. Business would have responded. History tells us that.

#68 | Posted by Eddie at 2009-06-09 12:41 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

"History tells us that."

See if your junior high school is offering a summer class in history you could take, preferably one taught by someone who knows more about history than simply spouting banalities.

#69 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-06-09 12:44 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Doc Sarvis - always good for a personal insult and deflection when slapped in the face with simple irrefutable facts. Sure starvis , dismiss the facts as "banalities"

Can you please xpalain Sarvis, where Eddie is going wrong here?
Please xplain, since you are the history expert, I guess, when did cutting taxes and controlling spending NOT boost the economy.

AT the same time, please think up examples of when increasing spending and increases taxes HELPED the economy.
You are a such a little prick cockstarvis - every time you can't handle the heat you think you can dismiss the facts that have just made you look like an ass.

Unable to differentiate between the FIRST four months of an 8 year Presidential term, and the LAST four months of an 8 year Presidential term, Eddie's meager 25 watts begins to flicker.

#70 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

You shoot from the hip way too much, as always. Ultimately, you have to admit you were wrong.... but never do and just fade away and pretend to make fun of me to divert. LOL!!!!

Can you please xpalain Sarvis, where Eddie is going wrong here?

#71 | Posted by 8roper

He can't Obama is God! MSM said so today.

Ultimately, you have to admit you were wrong....

#72 | Posted by Eddie

And I will - just as soon as you show evidence that the MSM called Bush the "worst President since Hoover" in the first four months of his first term.

And....

Go!

Libs,

today I am making fun of you. If you voted for Obama, then you are responsible for the present condition of the economy.

Libs,

today I am making fun of you.

#75 | Posted by Eddie

Ok, show of hands... who's crushed?

#75 | Posted by Eddie at 2009-06-09 01:03 PM

The slow witted oftem make fun of what they can't understand.

And I will - just as soon as you show evidence that the MSM called Bush the "worst President since Hoover" in the first four months of his first term.

And....

Go!

#74 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Just do a search.

It's called google.com

Just do a search.

It's called google.com

#78 | Posted by Eddie

I think we all know the translation of THAT particular dodge.

And....

Go!

#74 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

I don't know who I agree with on the first 4 mos GWB thing -
but "and.....GO!" is always funny

hey did you steal that from me?

I just did a Google for "worst President since Hoover" and every Bush article is from 2004. That would be towards the end of his first term, not in the first four months.

Just search with the keywords "Bush Hoover 2002"

Honesty is really going to help you here, Rogue

Just Googled "Bush Hoover 2002" and got 18 months, not 4.

sorry, Eddie:

CNN nuetral to positve for GWB

NYT basically also nuetral to positive, but possibly with a little bit of backhanded slapping:

thinkprogress.org

#84 | Posted by 8roper

They've changed their tune? See the date of the article.

Honesty is really going to help you here, Rogue

#82 | Posted by Eddie

Pretty much appears that nothing like that was really floated until well after the post 9/11 economic downturn was in full swing.

Not the first 4 months.

They've changed their tune? See the date of the article.

#85 | Posted by Eddie

2001 vs 2002.

but whether it is correct or not that the MSM roasted bush after 5 mos., the fact remains that AMERICANS HATE OBAMA after only 5 mos.

I refer you to the following informative DR thread.

So well written -
I smell Pulitzer prize

Pretty much appears that nothing like that was really floated until well after the post 9/11 economic downturn was in full swing.

Not the first 4 months.

#86 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

true. However, the economic downturn IS in full swing now.

My point is that MSM piled on Bush in 2002 when the economy was at its worst but are strangely quiet now. NOTHING about the Stimulus Package.

In short, I have to agree with Limbaugh. I hope Obama fails! Fails at Remaking of America.

BTW, I can't stand Limbaugh! Can't stand Hannity either.

Headline should have read:

CLINTON SAYS OBAMA PASSES 'MAKE-BELIEVE' TEST CREATED BY HER MARKETING TEAM OUT OF DESPERATION!!

My bartender continually flunks me for my 2 a.m. test, so I guess Obama is a better man than I.

Can you please xpalain Sarvis, where Eddie is going wrong here?
#71 | Posted by 8roper

Eddie veered off into meaningless banalities when he wrote, "History tells us that." Having read some of your posts, I'm not sure you're going to grasp this, either (and I'm pretty certain Eddie won't have a clue), but -- what the hell -- it's worth a try:

Poor Doc Sarvis-

It took you THAT long to come up with a post and reference that does not address the issue?

the issue is: where is Eddie wrong that cutting taxes and cutting spending boosts the economy - peripheral semantics aside.

You win the DR prize for time and effort invested into non -results

#94 | Posted by 8roper

Sorry, kiddo, but you don't set the parameters of discussion. My remark was directed to Eddie and it concerned, quite specifically, a statement he made about history and the quaint idea that it "tells us" this or it "tells us" that.

Poor Doc Sarvis-

It took you THAT long to come up with a post and reference that does not address the issue?

the issue is: where is Eddie wrong that cutting taxes and cutting spending boosts the economy - peripheral semantics aside.

You win the DR prize for time and effort invested into non -results

#94 | Posted by 8roper at 2009-06-09 03:06 PM | Reply | Flag:

WHAT IS WITH YOU CLOWNS ACCUSING OTHERS OF TAKING TOO LONG TO COME UP WITH A REPLY?

HINT: THIS ISN'T A FUCKING CHATROOM, DUMBASS!

People don't sit around waiting for replies.....at least most of us don't.

"today I am making fun of you. If you voted for Obama, then you are responsible for the present condition of the economy."

That's fuckin' hilarious. As if the previous 50 years hadn't happened.

#96 | Posted by COMMONSENSE

I think some of these clowns have nothing better to do than make a post and sit around, drumming their fingers on a table, making sure the stapler doesn't need refilling, and sighing because they haven't been responded to within some unspecified, arbitrary period of time.

Huh? What? You talking to us?
-Boyd, Cooper, Badweek, Barney, and BetelG

Sorry, kiddo, but you don't set the parameters of discussion. My remark was directed to Eddie and it concerned, quite specifically, a statement he made about history and the quaint idea that it "tells us" this or it "tells us" that.

#95 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Oh no I'm sorry to see you have to try to save face - but your answer was directed at my challenge, it was not directed to Eddie, and in fatc you pasted my challenge into your post :

Can you please xpalain Sarvis, where Eddie is going wrong here?
#71 | Posted by 8roper

Eddie veered off into meaningless banalities when he wrote, "History tells us that." Having read some of your posts, I'm not sure you're going to grasp this, either (and I'm pretty certain Eddie won't have a clue), but -- what the hell -- it's worth a try:

"History tells us," is one of those non sequiturs that are like fingernails on a chalkboard to my ears. History, speaking either literally or metaphorically, does not tell us much at all, at least not anything that was not self-evident to begin with. Unlike Newtonian physics, history does not present to us clean, crisp, and clear laws of human behavior. History is a messy subject. Historical insights are almost always matters of interpretation and disputation, conjecture and refutation.
Jay Cost
The Wall Street Journal
www.opinionjournal.com

#93 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

and also we have just revisited your moronic answer that has something to do with your dissapproving of the words "history tells us"

because you cannot face the fact that cutting taxes and cutting spending helps the economy.

furthermore - yes you DO sit around in front of DR posting all day - count up your avg number of posts compared to mine.

I notice you can't quite bring yourself to address the point. Next time, perhaps you'll stick to a subject you actually know something about. Like...or....perhaps....it's definitely not "semantics." LOL.

SANOBAMA and DOC (DICKHEAD) SARVIS:

You two liberal ASSHOLES must be on the Obama wefare list that you both have so much time on your hands to spill your liberal undocumented bullshit.

#101 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

hanging around and trading slaps with the poster "8roper" for this long a period of time does not look good on you.

And I have no problem admitting that. How bout you?

You were slapping? All I heard was some pissing, moaning, and an inordinate amount of slipping and sliding as you tried on your oversized clown shoes. Stick to something you know something about -- it's clearly not polls and it's definitely not "semantics" -- and you might not look like such a pedantic fool next time around.

Stick to something you know something about .

OK if you promise to stay away from economics - you still cannot explain your dismissal of the fact that cutting taxes and cutting spending boosts the economy. You could not back up your dismissal- and you deflected to tearing apart the phrase "history shows"....what a lame moron. It's in the thread above here. In black and white. nothing is going to take away the documentation ( or in your case, "dickumentation") of your inability to handle yourself in a debate with me ...except the paasage of time. sweet merciful time will wash away this thread in the need for space to post other threads.

P.S. I tried to talk you out of it in my previous post ...yet you keep coming back to try and better me.....and prove something to the one or 2 other people that might still be viewing this thread.

How does it feel to know that you are a moron ???

It's just "semantics," as you would say. (Albeit, without knowing what the term "semantics" actually means.) Keep plugging away, sparky. LOL

Please. Obama pass a leadership test? Even his teleprompter has kicked his ass three times. Great orator, riiiiiiiiight.
During his one and only term, the cycle is already turning towards the rise of the machine once again. Newt? Palin? Who cares. You could run a dead man and he'd win against this fool.
Watching it happen, priceless!

semantics - any moron could have looked it up by now.

you should probably go do that

in the google search bar type

"define: semantics"

Check in with me tomorrow
i expect a full report
i expect to see some improvement.

now I have to log off, hop off the train , and go enjoy my real life with my wife and kids.

sorry you will be on your PC all night arguing with the rest of the "8ropers" of the world

"semantics - any moron could have looked it up by now."

You couldn't/didn't. LOL.

I think some of these clowns have nothing better to do than make a post and sit around, drumming their fingers on a table, making sure the stapler doesn't need refilling, and sighing because they haven't been responded to within some unspecified, arbitrary period of time.

#98 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2009-06-09 04:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

It does seem that way.

The other day, I was asked to provide proof and literally 7 minutes later, someone else typed 'crickets' as if I had no proof because I hadn't answered within 7 minutes.

I swear some of these posters just sit there clicking the refresh button like lab Monkeys that press a button and get piece of food.

click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click
click click click click

Libs, today I am making fun of you. If you voted for Obama, then you are responsible for the present condition of the economy.
#75 | POSTED BY EDDIE AT 2009-06-09 01:03 PM | REPLY | FLAG: WILL KEEP TELLING US THIS TILL SOMEONE ACTUALLY BELIEVES IT.

The Obama foreign policy team - led by Joe Biden - is a seasoned team but with big egos. Its also a "lefty" foreign policy team that will tend to lecture countries on "lefty" issues that will tend to annoy our allies. Non-proliferation, human rights, tariffs, climate change, etc. Also, its Bill Clinton's foreign policy team - so you will see the same kind foreign policy advances that we saw under Clinton - essentially nothing.

Hillary's 3AM test? Is that the test where his wife wakes up at 3am and realizes he is sleeping next to her instead of out chasing ass?

#113 Damn, I was just going to point that out.

FF

the 3am test for the obamaboy is his meds now allow allowed him to sleep all night without getting up to piss five times. now he only gets up then for a cigarette

Old Hill must be smoking crack. This country is in shambles and its fare worse off than under Bush. The only 3 am call that Obama is getting is from the Service Service confirming that Michelle is still sleep and that he can bang more chicks.