I always blame things on a middle-aged white guy who is bald on top but has a pony tail in the back. Usually I say he was wearing cargo shorts and deck shoes without socks. Sometimes I may say he was wearing a hawaiian shirt or carrying a guitar case.

I...I....I....I have an alibi!

Usually I say he was wearing cargo shorts and deck shoes without socks.

Spud usually goes with a a mulletted, fanny pack wearing guy in sandals and socks wearing double demin and a mesh shirt.

Spud reckons that if the cops do find someone dressed like that that person deserves the beats they get.

Be Well.

I always blame things on the pig.

It was the one-armed man!

It was my half-step neighbor-in-law....

Spud usually goes with a a mulletted, fanny pack wearing guy in sandals and socks wearing double demin and a mesh shirt.

#3 | Posted by dethspud

SO, this is the type of man you prefer huh?

"a mulletted, fanny pack wearing guy in sandals and socks wearing double demin and a mesh shirt."

Sounds like you've met ChickenLicker in person.

Funny, unless you are a black man in the vicinity.

She should have said Muslim man then they could have called in the FBI and given her an award for courage...

#5 the Rev returns?

She should have blamed George Bush or Bill Clinton. Enough hacks are committed to backing anyone who does that.

Two Black men in a Cadillac? She should have
gone for the hat trick and said it happened in
the parking lot of a Popeye's Fried Chicken.
Stupid Stupid Stupid. She should have placed the
blame on a couple of neocons in Hummers. That would have given her more credibility.

"Spud usually goes with a a mulletted, fanny pack wearing guy in sandals and socks wearing double demin and a mesh shirt."

Where do you go?

I can fully understand the outrage most black people would have, but that being said, there's still a lot of work to be done to change the negative perception.

Where I grew up, it was the big indian with the purple blanket and hooked nose.

Let's not pretend we can't possibly understand why people would blame a violent crime on a negro, ok.

For fucks sake, chances are if a violent crime happens, it was done by a black man.

Where do you go?

#14 | Posted by JOE at 2009-06-03 10:40 AM | Reply |

I'm guessing the kiddie pool.

Look, why don't Blacks and Whites sit down in a spirit of conciliation and brotherhood and just agree to blame Latins from now on?

Reminds me a bit of when the whore in North Carolina swore a group of white frat boys raped her..

"Them white boys did it" is also an oft used lie.

"The white boys did it", still has shine on it.

"The black man did it", is so tatered from overuse even other white people are saying, DAMN!!!

Damn, I forgot about that rape. The press and the D A jumped on that like a duck on a june bug.

Lone white guy in a white van.

No wait That was Malvo and Muhammad.

Ain't stereotyping fun?

#17 | Posted by 101Chairborne

Lies work well because there are suckers like you who eat them up -- like the lies that started the Iraq War. You ate up that bullshit, too. Have you bought your Shamwow yet?

Duke University deserves a big shit sandwich for the way they treated those boys. THey are still paying the price for that lie.

Or the lies about taxation the started the American Revolution? All wars have lies in them. It's part of it.
I just wish we had gotten out as soon as Hussein was found and let the place fall into anarchy on its own. That would have been a clearer message with far fewer lives lost.

Duke was not a race issue, but a sex issue. Any woman of any color who says she was raped will always be believed and the men will always have to prove themselves innocent.

the ultimate in violent crimes (Iraq War, CIA assasinations, Torture of innocents, serial killings, to catch a predator etc.) are usually committed/executed/authorized by white men.

and the root cause of the ultimate in non-violent crime (the current financial debacle) can be attributed to white men as well.

so please stop blaming us (black men), we are just trying to live

Kan,
Bullshit. It was most definitely a race issue.
Nifong (sp) played it for all it was worth.
(generically, you're right about the rape angle, but the race issue trumped it in this case)

Duke was not a race issue, but a sex issue.

C'mon, kanrei. Be real. Do you honestly think she would have pulled that stunt on a bunch of brothers in a black fraternity?

#24 | Posted by mrbgoode at 2009-06-03 11:19 AM | Reply | Flag

So you're saying that blacks aren't involved in the majority of violent crimes?
Ummmm, you're not tethered to reality are you? I'll let you look at the crime stats and realize your own stupidity.

Funny, unless you are a black man in the vicinity.

#9 | Posted by fresno500 at

not to worry

holder and obama will just drop the charges since they have already set that precedent

and before some of you get on your blame whitey sancataonious train.
remember what jesse jackson said about his fear of being followed by a black man or whatever that was..

Global74 remember it was Colin Powell who sold that bullshit story to Congress and to the UN about Saddam's mobile nerve gas manufacturing plant!

Anyway I think OJ did it.

"Duke was not a race issue, but a sex issue. Any woman of any color who says she was raped will always be believed and the men will always have to prove themselves innocent."

It was too. If the kids were black or the stripper were some bleached blonde skank, the local people wouldn't have cared and all the PC professors who came out against these kids would have stayed out of it. The "rich white kids abusing a black woman" angle was a big part of it.

Ooga Booga, I ain't done did it.

Dogpile Kanrei!

#31 | Posted by 101Chairborne

Thanks, that answered my question. It doesn't really absorb soda from under the rug, does it?

I don't agree, but we are all entitled to our opinions. I didn't see the Duke case as any different than the William Kennedy Smith case or any other high profile rape case. I saw Duke make the news because it was a gang rape more than white on black, but that could have just been how I see it. Rape is the one crime where I feel race doesn't matter, the sex of the accused does.

where race DOES matter in the duke case is the reaction of some.
is there any doubt whatsoever that if the lying slut were white that the poverty pimps would have just read it in the sunday paper and just ignored it.

What?

Even lies have to be PC now?

I'm just sayin', what exactly is the crime here?

Lying to the police or lying badly to the police?

It doesn't really absorb soda from under the rug, does it?

Not if you watch the ad closely.

The Duke case was both racial and sexual.

There's statistical evidence that properly investigated allegations of rape result in the "victim" recanting, on average, 50% of the time.

Then there's a mistaken notion that men are naturally abusive and women are always the victims.

Switch the race of the parties and Nifong would have tiptoed through the process - though a jury would have convicted the black guys.

Unfortunately this twit is only charged with misdemeanors. I think false allegations of a crime should bear the same level of prosecution as the offense claimed - in this case a Class A felony.

When we start putting people in jail or prison for crap like this they'll think twice about making false allegations that carry a criminal penalty.

The thing about rape is that we need to keep both the victim's and the accused's name from out of the press. Too often the victim is protected and the accused it dragged through the press and condemned before trial. After the trial, we don't remember the results, but we do remember teh accused.

yes kanrie

example of this was not long ago when a judge refused to let a 5 year old testify from other room on closed circuit and when she walked in and saw the man who raped her repeatedly she could hardly talk....the judge gave the piece of shit man like a year or less...........

and after its all done..ESPECAILLY if the man is the harrasser...the press NEVER GIVES ANY acquital the same amount of space do they?

LOL! The first 10 minutes of the news at ten.

The problem is that while often it's 'an old lie' that a 'black man did it' much more often it's true. That's not a racist statement that's fact backed up by DOJ statistics showing per capita violent criminal activity is along the lines of 8x higher for black males than white males.

BOOJIBOY,

Yes,
you are correct. Colin Powell decided to play the role of the good soldier; so he went to the UN and lied his arse off.

But that still doesnt take away from the fact that he was sent there by his Bush Administration masters, Dick "chicken hawk" Cheney and Donald "neoCon" Rumsfeld.

These are two white men that love to blame everyone else for their murderous tendencies.

101_Im_A_stormFront_poster,

on a global level, the majority of violent crimes are committed by white men.

"Spud usually goes with a a mulletted, fanny pack wearing guy in sandals and socks wearing double demin and a mesh shirt."

Where do you go?

#14 | Posted by JOE at 2009-06-03 10:40 AM | Reply | Flag: TROLLING FOR THREESOME

on a global level, the majority of violent crimes are committed by white men.
#47 | POSTED BY GL0BAL74 AT 2009-06-03 12:52 PM | REPLY | FLAG

I guess it depends on your definition of violent crimes. If you think Iraq is a violent crime, or pollution from corporations is a violent crime, then yes.

If your talking about getting stabbed in the street, I doubt very much you are correct.

These are two white men that love to blame everyone else for their murderous tendencies.

#46 | Posted by gl0bal74 at 2009-06

and two men who also kept us safe for 7 years.

heres hoping that gates and biden and say the same..

"kept us safe for 7 years."

Oh, not counting 2001, eh?

The reason a claim that "a black man did it" works is that it is consistent with actual scenarios of crimes committed with often involve black criminality. Black participation in crimes of violence is disproportionate, so naming a black as the perpetrator confers a sense of verisimilitude on the claim.

What are you folks suggesting? Her claim was untrue. But was it unreasonable? What's the issue? Is it that people contriving to make a false accusation should avoid introducing the racial component. Is this some special rule? Is there, or should there be, a Marquis of Queensbury guide for people making false complaints?

Reminds me a bit of when the whore in North Carolina swore a group of white frat boys raped her..
#20 | POSTED BY NMG_NO
--------

I remember that like it was yesterday. All the silly bleeding hearts on this site defending that piece of garbage. Calling anyone who didn't believe her story a racist. What a bunch of maroons.

Oh, not counting 2001, eh?

#51 | Posted by mrbgoode

well lets see..
add the one
carry the two....less the ...WAIT A MINl....one two.

WELL I guess not

so then maybe libs should count all the way back to the first trade center bombing and the embassies and the cole and the other places that americans were also injured and killed.

OOPS sorry ..cant go there can we???

please dont even try and get into a fight on this with me....

I can come up with blowjob comments on any subject
because IM the morey amsterdam of the retort on THAT subject

have a good day

101_Im_A_stormFront_poster,

#47 | Posted by gl0bal74 at 2009-06-03 12:52 PM | Reply

Yes, because pointing out the verifiable fact that black men committ a disproportionate amount of violent crimes is racist...

The sooner you limpwrists realize it, the better.

"Them white boys did it" is also an oft used lie.

#20 | Posted by nmg_no
Rich White boys you mean

Speaking of false accusations, this was individual misconduct by a seemingly unstable woman. The "white community" did not join in and denounce blacks and black people and black criminality and participation in violent crime in such disproportionate numbers. The "white establishment" considered it an unfortunate incident, but did not use the accusation to assail law enforcement, and the courts, and the black community. And the media did not join in and engage in a media circus condemning blacks generally for their attitudes in such activity, or in any way raise the situation to a cause celebre.

Contrast this with false accusations by blacks of white misconduct. Immediately, the situation is elevated into a media circus. Whites and their attitudes generally are condemned as condoning such activity and providing an environment in which it could occur.

Black scumbags, who have made their livelihood as racial pimps and agitators, emerge out of the woodwork with their condemnations of whites generally and the perpetrator in particular. Guilt ridden white intelligentsia join in the condemnation before any facts are established. White government officials enter the fray repudiating and condemning the alleged perpetrators.

Look at the Tawana Bradley incident. And neither she nor her "advocate" Rev. Sharpton, was prosecuted.

More recently, the Duke incident occurred, and who was condemned without trial. The media frenzy, the university offically and the faculty groups joined in the condemnation and ostracized the victims of the false complaint. And of course, the accuser was never prosecuted. Was this because she was black? Was the excuse for allowing her to run unpunished that she was unstable, and therefore not responsible for the problems she caused so many innocent people.

The most disquieting aspect of the difference in the false accusations is that the blacks lying and causing problems did so by accusing actual individuals of crimes they did not commit, a far more harmful accusation to them than the false report by this white woman.

This white accuser never inculpated any individual or caused harm and distress to any individual with her lies. She is being held to answer and rightfully condemned, while the black malefactors walk away from the messes and distress they cause without bad consequences for themselves.

And it is the comportment of blacks generally that makes the accusation that blacks were involved in the commission of a violent street crime a viable accusation. If blacks were not so conspicuous in their disproportionate participation in violent street crime, this accusation that an anonymous black criminal was involved would have been unremarkable. It is only because of the general applicability of the charge to the black community that makes it remarkable.

#55 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-06-03 01:35 PM

The sooner you limpwrists realize it, the better.

Euphonic.

Why are the members of the army of the limpwrist left marching in lockstep in their vociferous condemnation of this woman for her crime of making a false report? These are the same leftist fascist goons, who were so quick to malign the victims of false accusations previously, and then discounted the harm done to the falsely accused. You lefties are members of an unthinking bandwagon mob, who like Pavlov's dog have an actuator which commits you to a course of conduct. Introduce the word "black," and the lockstep limpwrist left has its ducks all in a row as it reenacts scenarios built on a theme.

And you folks, of course, tend to elevate the matter out of all proportion.

The killing of two minority scumbag burglars by heroic Joe Horn evoked paeans of praise for the burglars from some, and condemnation of Joe Horn. The killing by the pharmacist of the scumbag masked black robber, in an incident where the black perpetrators were trying to kill their victims, evoked condemnation of the innocent pharmacist thrust into this situation, where the killing of a white scumbag robber would not have raised any sense of distress.

You limpwrist lefties are prisoners of your ideology, salivating and entering into the prescribed mode when the actuator "black" is introduced. As you wend your way through life, your guidebook says, let this be your goal, keep your eye upon race and not upon the whole. The tragedy is that few of your recognize the distorting prism that race is to you in governing and limiting your thought processes. You're in thrall. Prisoners. You would fit right in in a North Korean milieu singing songs of praise to portended new "Beloved Leader," 26 year old communist dynast, Kim Jong-Un. You folks sure are programmed.

A black man did it.

No wonder Johnson's wife is smiling...

its no mystery that Black men have been used as scapegoats in this country to justify genocide and unlawful imprisonment.

yall complain that we steal your wallet while Bernie Madoff, Allen Greenspan, and Phil Gramm take your life savings and entire 401K.

yall complain that we sell drugs while the Bush Crime family harvests poppy fields in Afghanistan

yall complain that we are lazy while Bush took 487 days at Camp David and 490 days at Crawford. (thats nearly 2.6 years vacation during an 8 year term)

we arent the ones giving the orders to invade sovereign nations for Oil, we arent the ones giving orders to bomb Iraqi children/civilians.

we are just trying to live

Hes_got_a_very_small_Johnson and 101_Im_A_StormFront_poster,

I can tell yall got some real hate in your blood for black folks, must be that good "Christian" upbringing yall keep bragging about.

Facts equal hate for blacks? How are facts racist? Blacks are involved in a majority of violent crimes in the USA. It's indisputable, which is why a dumbshit like you wants to throw out the race card instead of proving the point wrong.

It's the "lazy" way out...

is torture a violent crime?

how about tasering old ladies?

"Facts equal hate for blacks? How are facts racist? Blacks are involved in a majority of violent crimes in the USA. It's indisputable, which is why a dumbshit like you wants to throw out the race card instead of proving the point wrong.

It's the "lazy" way out...

#64 | Posted by 101Chairborne "

StillBorne, Black men run away from their own wives and children. Why the fuck would they ever try to take some other guy's slacker bitch and retarded rugrat? If you are going to be a racist shit at least follow the basic stereotypes.

Global74: Are you suggesting that Colin was only doing his master's bidding?

He had no mind of his own?

Rather stereotypical.

The Black Man Did It lie last made news as recently as October, when a John McCain volunteer claimed a 6-foot-4 black man carved a B into her cheek (For Barack, evidently)

Palin and the NOPpers are still pissed that didn't work. I say palin because I'd like to believe McToast, desperate as he was, wouldn't stoop to race baiting. Sarayers, on the other hand....

so then maybe libs should count all the way back to the first trade center bombing and the embassies and the cole and the other places that americans were also injured and killed.

Aflac-like you are counting the nearly 5000 Americans killed in afghanistan and Iraq since 9-11? The bomb-riddled embassies in those countries and Turkey and Yemen, since 9-11?

When it comes to protecting America from terrorists, even Reagan and his beirut bug-out look good compared to your hero and his FAILS.

A: A Black man Did It

Q: Who took NG3's virginity?

Q: Who took NG3's virginity?

I didn't know montetroll was black

I didn't know montetroll was black

#72 | Posted by goatman at 2009-06-03 05:52 PM | Reply | Flag: Can't Stop Thinking about Montecore; Obsessed

Can't Stop Thinking about Montecore;

If you would remove your lips from my peter, you would be easier to forget

"If you would remove your lips from my peter, you would be easier to forget

#74 | Posted by goatman at 2009-06-03 05:55 PM"

If it weren't stuck between my teeth, I would.

If it weren't stuck between my teeth, I would.

#75 | Posted by mOntecOre at 2009-06-03 05:56 PM | Reply | Flag: the not so original, "I know you are but what am I?"

You're slipping, old man LOL

You're slipping, old man LOL

#76 | Posted by goatman at 2009-06-03 05:59 PM | Reply | Flag: Defending Goatsona

#62 | Posted by gl0bal74 at 2009-06-03 03:30 PM

Got it global, all the misdeeds of all of the other people are factors in mitigation of black misconduct. Interesting viewpoint.

Got it Johnson. You're a white supremacist idiot that truly believes the colour of ones skin determines IQ

stupid viewpoint

#63 | Posted by gl0bal74 at 2009-06-03 03:32 PM

Hes_got_a_very_small_Johnson and 101_Im_A_StormFront_poster,

I can tell yall got some real hate in your blood for black folks, must be that good "Christian" upbringing yall keep bragging about.

Now I don't know if I could be considered as raised as a Christian from a mainstream perspective as my mother was a Jehovah's Witness, you know Kingdom Hall, and Awake and Watchtower and all that, and Kingdom Hall was the one place of Sunday worship that was not segregated but was fully integrated. Ironically, I attended Catholic graduate schools, but that's another matter. Unlike the lockstep lefties, I don't have a vision of blacks as separate and apart, but regard them as individuals. I don't have a need to glamorize black suffering or black achievement as somehow distinguished from human suffering and human achievement. So, I don't cut black people an enormous amount of slack as some arrogant lefties do, those who consider themselves paternalistic and protective of blacks because they postulate with that view that they individually are superior to blacks, and who pretend that black lives are extraordinarily distinguished from those of other people. Leftists tend to dehumanize blacks instead converting them to symbols, and working with symbolic blacks rather than according them any humanity as people capable of the whole range of human activity and experience.

#79 | Posted by gl0bal74 at 2009-06-03 06:40 PM

Got it Johnson. You're a white supremacist idiot that truly believes the colour of ones skin determines IQ

Although I recognize that this might be an exercise in futility as you probably lack the ability to understand, I'll try to provide you with a simplified explanation of a matter that you don't seem to get.

No one said that skin color is a determinative of intelligence. There are ranges of intelligence within groups. There are ranges of other attributes within groups.

All of the sprint records are held by people of West African descent. For some reason the genes of those people mutated in such a way as to confer the ability to run faster.

People clustered in different rarefied air regions developed different mechanisms to cope with the situation. In the Himalyan Highlands one mechanism developed. In the Andes another evolved. These are adaptations that enable people living under such conditions to function better.

People living in malaria ridden areas developed and maintained a sickle cell mutation that provided them with immunity from that pervasive malady. Unfortunately if that gene were inherited from both parents, then instead of being advantageous, it resulted in debilitating and deadly sickle cell anemia.

People clustered in different areas undergo the speciation process which operates cumulatively. Certain African groups, Bushmen and pygmies, have an average IQ of 60. Their ability to solve problems encountered in a technological and scientifically based society is limited. Other groups of Africans suffer similar limitations although they are not as severe. If you review the data describing school performance of people of African descent, you will find that statistically, they fall behind whites and Asians. Even in D.C., which provides extraordinarily costly education, some $15,000 per child, and a 15.2 to 1 teacher ratio, performance of blacks is poor. That doesn't mean that individual blacks may not be extraordinarily accomplished, but the average is there. I judge people in general, including blacks, on my observation of their accomplishment rather than on a stereotypical basis that evaluates them as a member of a group.

I'll stop here. You can engage in all sorts of convoluted reasoning in an attempt to avoid the conclusions that use of Occam's Razor, produce.

I recognize that you've been conditioned to dispute the occurrence of differences between and among groups, and that you are emotionally bound by those beliefs, so I am not anticipating that you are able to pierce the veil and observe empirical reality. You seem to be an indoctrinated ideologue, so just go about your business. You may not get the distinction between "the colour of one's skin determines IQ" and the rationale that I have submitted, but unfortunately, that's your loss. By the way, you use the English spelling of colour. Are you "from around here?"

By the way, you certainly are not responsive, not that I expect you to be, but how do the enumerated political actions of white folk and economic crimes of white folk reduce the cupidity of black criminal violence in our society" What's your purpose in listing them? What are they supposed to demonstrate? There is no need to be circumspect and seek inferences. State your case, and what the listings mean to you and should suggest to us. How do those matters excuse black violent crime?

NorthGuy is just trying to be white. Northguy what is the best way to fry chicken?

If you look at the stastics it probably was a black man.

Of course 74, you realize that the youtube you posted is entirely unrelated to the matter at issue. But then, possibly you are unable to articulate your position.

The subject seems to give rise to an emotional response for you that cuts off any ability to examine what is being said.

You seem to think for example, that observing that blacks as a group perform less well than whites or Asians in certain intellectual pursuits, somehow is prejudicial. No one has suggested that individual blacks be considered as stereotypes and symbols rather than human beings and be excluded from any activity, or that they should in any way suffer discrimination.

And blacks seem to excel in other areas, which may be far more beneficial to their functioning. For example, as basketball athletes, they as a group are incomparable with the outstanding performers being black. Different genetic heritage results in different distribution of abilities, or problems, such as what is it BRCA 1 and BRCA 2, the genes that predispose Ashkenazi Jews to breast cancer.

That does not negate the fact that members of a group may not have the distribution of skill sets to enable them to participate in all facets of society on a basis proportional to their numbers. How does that exclude or discriminate against anyone. You have probably been brainwashed to think that there are no gene clusters, and that speciation of isolated groups is not a continuing process since it seems to be an ideological mandate for you that nature not operate the way it does. But then, I can't fault you for lacking insight given your conditioning.

Come on 74, declare yourself. What if anything are your thoughts. Please try to avoid mindless name calling like the woman in the video, and as some of the leftist posters delight in doing rather than addressing issues.

So you're saying that blacks aren't involved in the majority of violent crimes?
Ummmm, you're not tethered to reality are you? I'll let you look at the crime stats and realize your own stupidity.

#31 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-06-03 11:30 AM

Crime Statistics by race:

truth hurts.

these wannabe skinheads and dead-enders cant handle this ether:

do white police officers commit violence against innocent Blacks?

is torture a violent crime?

are bombs that kill innocent women and children violent?

"are bombs that kill innocent women and children violent?"

No, they are just victims of past abuse. Poor things.

I think innocent bombs are victims of violent children and women. The bombs don't blow up until a child or woman gets in the way. Poor bombs...we need a ribbon to show our support for them. Millions of bombs are blown to pieces every day in war and silence. Please help.

who organized the debacle in Iraq? Im sure it was a couple of white dudes from PNAC, the AEI, or the Heritage Foundation

who is pushing for more violence against innocents in Persia?

Say 74, you seem to be trying to impose a taboo to prevent consideration of objective empirical measurements of black intellectual acumen and its effect on black accomplishment in school achievement, and in technological and scientific fields, when group achievement is measured.

In school district after school district, black academic failure is due to "bad teachers." Got it. Blacks are brilliant, but it's the other guy's fault. Blacks perform poorly on tests because it's bad to test intelligence even if there is a relation between the tests and job performance.

Anyway 74, what's your point? Is it that I am a bad guy with bigoted views that the facts dispute? Or is it that you have evidence that black academic accomplishment is better than presented, and these statistics are all lies?

It may be that you comprehension is such that you don't really understand what is written, and so you cry "Bigot" as if any realistic evaluation of performance is prohibited. By yelling, "Bigot," you don't establish anything but your inability to refute the information presented. But then again your level of understanding may make you impervious to grasping the facts.

Maybe you should get crayons and draw schoolboy cartoons, using them rather than language to indicate your distress. Pathetic.

What is the projected distance in AUs to the sun from the Earth on December 31, 2010 at 9:00 P.M. from City Hall in New York City.

Some poster is entering other posts totally unrelated to the extent of black criminal cupidity as if those matters either mitigate or justify black criminality.

What's wrong 74? Do all of these other matters account for black criminality? Do they justify it? Do they make it less of a societal problem?

Sorry I asked the questions. I am foolish for pretending that you are capable of formulating a rational reply. I don't mean to rebuke you. You are doing the best you can, and considering your limitations your perseverance is commendable. Your persistence even though you don't have a clue as to what is being discussed demonstrates a resolve even if it is without purpose other than to allay your distress.