Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, May 13, 2009

With deep cuts in their budget, the nuclear warhead disposal team faces a 15 year backlog. With a current backlog of thousands of old warheads currently set for demolition, President Obama is planning the retirement of many more bombs and warheads. The disposal of all warheads and bombs will now take until 2030 to complete.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

keith204

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Well, better late than never.

The US having nukes, is a threat to the world and to themselves. America should be disarmed as soon as and as completely as possible.

so should pakistan.

Never.

1.We have a legitimate need. America doesn't.

2.The US has had a number of accidents involving their nukes over the decades. Pakistan has never had an accident.

3.If US and Russia has been India and Pakistan for a day, they would have nuked each other that day. We, as you can see, are far more responsible.

Well,we could dispose of our nukes in western asia.

The right

We have over ten thousand nuclear weapons. Pakistan? What, 10?

Which 'accidents' are you talking about? Must only be reported on the Pakinet.

Pakistan? What, 10?


Over 300.

Same as UK, France, etc.


Which 'accidents' are you talking about?


Oh boy...

www.cdi.org

Despite claims that the U.S. nuclear stockpile is safe and reliable, the number of accidents involving America's atomic arsenal is a matter of concern. The Department of Defense (DoD) first published a list of nuclear weapon accidents in1968 which detailed 13 serious nuclear weapon accidents between 1950-1968. An updated and revised list released in 1980 catalogued 32 accidents between1950-1980. However, this second compilation failed to include some of the accidents covered in the 1968 list.

Pakistan has enough megatons to kill everyone on this planet (the radiation dose required to kill a person multiplied by the number of people on this planet) around once or twice.

That's more than anyone needs.

Why is America holding on to an arsenal that can kill everyone over a hundred times??? LOL

The lid to Pandora's Box has been lifted on Nukes. As much as I would like the whole world to be Nuke free it's not gonna happen. Oh and Tosser with Your Country selling Nuke technologies and Nuclear Materials to places like North Korea You have no leg to stand upon by declaring You have a legitament need for Nukes but the US Doesn't. With "Friends" like You guys in Pakistan who needs enemies.

Larry

1.We have a legitimate need. America doesn't.

Other countries have nukes. America wants to maintain strategic superiority. Therefore we make nukes.

2.The US has had a number of accidents involving their nukes over the decades. Pakistan has never had an accident.

When you have kept as many nukes as the US has, put them on platforms around the world like we have, and have simply possessed them for as long as we have, then pat yourself on the back. Until then... there's not much point.

3.If US and Russia has been India and Pakistan for a day, they would have nuked each other that day.

It's a miracle we didn't nuke eachother during the Cold War... not that I'm complaining!

We, as you can see, are far more responsible.

Oh, I feel so much better now. This sounds strangely like the guy who's put away a 12 pack telling me he's sober enough to drive. I'll be calling a cab. Or not getting shitfaced in the first place... but that's taking the analogy too far...

The fact of the matter is that nukes are nasty things that have no business on this planet, but now that they're here, they're going to be a pain in the ass to get rid of. How do you achieve "global zero" when there is not much incentive for any nation to relinquish their arsenal?

No one here glows in the dark. I can't recall ever seeing anyone glow in the dark. Maybe "dropping" them on the floor counts.

Oh and Tosser with Your Country selling Nuke technologies and Nuclear Materials to places like North Korea You have no leg to stand upon by declaring You have a legitament need for Nukes but the US Doesn't.


Kim wanted help. So we gave him only 1% of what we have.

The rest he figured out by himself.

He isn't stupid, you know. They are Koreans after all.


With "Friends" like You guys in Pakistan who needs enemies.


We stopped your Chimp from sending American soldiers into yet another pointless war.

We saved American lives from a madman. Think about THAT.

Why is America holding on to an arsenal that can kill everyone over a hundred times??? LOL

Um... after you nuke a country, you have to make sure you have enough nukes left over to take care of the radioactive zombies that will pop up after the fallout settles.

TOSSER

On this count you should be glad Obama was elected. We had the funds and a plan to dispose of nuclear material in the former Soviet Republics, but Bush bungled that too. Perhaps you've already read Obama will be talking to the Russians about reducing nuclear arsenals (and also about securing nuclear material in the former Soviet republics).

Nukes are horrible weapons.

When you have kept as many nukes as the US has, put them on platforms around the world like we have, and have simply possessed them for as long as we have, then pat yourself on the back.


Pakistan first tested a nuke in 1983 (Wiki sez it might have been as early as 1980).

We have had the ability to create a nuclear explosion since 1977. But the first weapon came along and was tested in 1983.

I think that is long enough for anyone to judge the safety protocols.

Yes, America has had more nuke accidents because you have more nukes... but China has never had an accident. Neither have the Russians (they have more nukes than America).

1. Americans are accident-prone and their safety protocols are not what they should be.

2. There is no need at all for having so many nukes.

Perhaps you've already read Obama will be talking to the Russians about reducing nuclear arsenals (and also about securing nuclear material in the former Soviet republics).


I think it's just talk.

When it happens, I'll believe it.

The bullshit arrogance from You is asstounding Tosser. Unbelievable.

Larry

We saved American lives from a madman. Think about THAT.

Yes, by graciously allowing internal strife to ravage your own country, your government has helped make Afghanistan so unmanagible that the US will eventually have to pull out.

Thanks!

What are these accidents? The US has lost warheads, but they have either been recovered or are lost in places where nobody is going to get them.

None of them accidentally went off, or anything like that.

allowing internal strife to ravage your own country


That's easy enough to fix.. as we are seeing right now. We could always have fixed it. LOL


your government has helped make Afghanistan so unmanagible that the US will eventually have to pull out.


Yep. We play using different rules.

We always win in the end. Ask the Soviet Union.

What are these accidents? The US has lost warheads, but they have either been recovered or are lost in places where nobody is going to get them.


Call them "worrisome incidents" then.

You got them. We don't. Russians don't. Chinese don't. Frenchies don't.

When it happens, I'll believe it.

My exact approach to Obama's "Change you can believe in".

You'll see a reduction in forces, but not a complete eradication. A "strategic balance" can be maintained with fewer warheads, and everyone realizes this - but once you cut the number very low, it becomes hairy. A limited strike can potentially eliminate all of an enemy's warheads or launchers. ABM defense is more viable. A preepmtive strike actually becomes more feasible.

Also, how do you verify disarmarment? I do not trust the word of any nation when it comes to their weapons systems.

Why is America holding on to an arsenal that can kill everyone over a hundred times??? LOL

Um... after you nuke a country, you have to make sure you have enough nukes left over to take care of the radioactive zombies that will pop up after the fallout settles.

~Zombiehunter

No duh. The once popular tried and true method of decapitating them one at a time with a blade or blowing their skulls up with automatic, high ordinance weaponry while arguably more eco-friendly is, unfortunately, too time consuming to be considered a reliable "be all/end all" strategy in an end time scenario as you envision it.

One should never get too overly complacent about killing zombies.

Laws no.

Be Well.

Call them "worrisome incidents" then.


You got them. We don't. Russians don't. Chinese don't. Frenchies don't.

#20 | Posted by Tosser at 2009-05-13 02:14 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

en.wikipedia.org

The hastily constructed nuclear industry providing the materials for the bomb project has caused severe environmental and health hazards by the release of radioactivity. The single most damaging incident took place at the nuclear fuel reprocessing plant Mayak in 1957 and is considered to be the largest release of radioactivity by accident, several times more severe than the Chernobyl disaster.

Well, the US is more or less at Pakistan's mercy when it comes to Afghanistan. I'm not sold either way on whether the US will be safer if there is a pullout soon. Al Qaida has been bloodied, but not defeated. They may train in your neck of the woods, but they get their recruits from the Arab nations (which is a seemingly unaddressed problem). The US is always going to be dealing with terrorists... who knows where the fight will take us next. Something makes me think that the job isn't done in Afghanistan yet.

And good luck cleaning up the mess in your backyard. One of the things the US learned in it's Regan-era dealings in Afghanistan is that sometimes when you make a deal with the devil, there's some unpleasantries in the fine print. And another lesson: a home-grown insurgency is a bitch to deal with. Ask the Soviets.

archive.greenpeace.org

Call them "worrisome incidents" then.


You got them. We don't. Russians don't.

The path to civilization:

1.) Take a bath.

2.) Google "K-129". (among others)

3.) Quit violating goats.

4.) Quit attempting to puff your little barbarian country and culture up into something even remotely equivalent to ours--especially while doing so in our language and in our technological mediums that our imperialism was kind enough to expose to you.

The brits invented english.
Cern invented the internet.
You are a dumbass.

Larry if you browse from that site you linked to, you'll find a whole shit ton of disturbing accidents - from all sorts of countries.

Nukes are nasty.


Larry if you browse from that site you linked to, you'll find a whole shit ton of disturbing accidents - from all sorts of countries.


Nukes are nasty.

Posted by ZombieHunter at 2009-05-13 02:42 AM | Reply


No Shit that's why I posted it to try and shut Tosser up about His arrogance about it only being Americans fault for Nuclear Accidents.

Larry

The brits invented english.
Cern invented the internet.

And their culture (and mine) provided you with essentially everything you currently have--- transcending, of course, your mere instinct for a coarse existence as an animal.

You're welcome.

It sucks that, even in the 21st century, we're still having to exercise our power (hard and soft) to civilize you people.

That's gotta sting a little, Khan.

That's what makes your Organ Monkey-savant schtick so entertaining.

Allah Akhbar!

That was my post, cockbreath. I'm an American. And an agnostic. No ties to Pakistan. So all your ranting about animals and the greatness of god (mind you, the same one all of the Christians worship) doesn't really mean shit to me.

I just see in you a heap of bullshit tall enough to cast a shadow into Europe. And I calls 'em like I sees 'em.

You're just a filthy uneducated boil on America's ass, too dissatisfied with life to be silent, but too much of a pussy to do anything more than bitch about it on the internet.

Keep bitching. See if it makes a damn bit of difference apart from providing the rest of us with cheap entertainment and a convenient electronic punching bag. The world may be going to shit from the ultraconservative perspective, but from my point of view, you're all revved up with no place to go. I will savor every last moment of your misery. The tears of a gypsy may cure your bodily ills, but the tears of a neocon will soothe your soul.

Sorry I pissed You off Zombie however I did it. Sighhhhhhh

That was directed at Jak Me Nao, sorry if I confused you.

I'm in agreement with you.

sorry

One should never get too overly complacent about killing zombies.

Exactly!

Ahhhhh ok. Sorry I got confusald again.

No Shit that's why I posted it to try and shut Tosser up about His arrogance about it only being Americans fault for Nuclear Accidents.


Go over that list again, junior.

Most of the accidents involving nuclear weapons, are American.

Other countries have accidents with nuclear reactors.

Americans, bless the incompetents, have accidents with nuclear weapons.

This thread is about curtailing nuclear weapons... not reactors. Don't confuse the two.

A nuclear accident is a nuclear accident. It doesn't matter if it's bombs reactors power plants etc etc. Please do try again Tosser.

Larry

Jack-me-off doesn't get it.

As Asians we do not believe in re-inventing the wheel.

We got our language from the British. Thank you, Englishman.

We got our legal system and democratic system from the British. Fuck them for giving us this poison.

We got the knowledge that the Anglo-Saxon white-man is out to get us .. in fact get all Asians.. Thank you China for making us realize it. They still haven't forgotten the Opium Wars.

We got your nukes. We got your super-computers (used for making simulated nuke tests). We got your missiles. We got you.

All by doing what I do every time I come here.

I copy you. LOL. "You can only fight one nightmare by becoming that same nightmare." (Chinese saying)

We are good at this skill and quite proud of it. It's the only skill we really need.

Please do try again Tosser.


I was clear from the start I mean nuclear weapons only.

I like to stick to topic.... which is nukes in the weapons sense.

Try not to muck up the waters any further, thanks.

I hope you get the significance of what I said.

If America was really full of nice people..... we would have no option but to copy nice people.

But since America is the horrid little prick it is... guess what.... you got Pakistan that is a horrid little prick. LOL

Whatever you are... we will become.

Be nice.. we will be nice. Be a prick... we will be pricks.

Here I have just told you the simple secret to getting whatever you want.

If all that America made was farming equipment.... countries like Pakistan would have farming equipment. China and Japan would only make farming equipment.

But since America chose to make nukes... guess what... we got nukes.

I think it is time for you to stay down for the count. Don't get up.

Learn the spirit of Akido. You got anything in your hand to hit me with ... it will be taken and used against you someday.

The only way is to empty your hands of all weapons and use the other guy's power against him.

The best way is to not fight against anyone at all.

"Asian" Wot a laugh. You're Iranian, Tosser.

You're Iranian, Tosser.


Just like I was British? And then I was from New Jersey?

Now I am Iranian?

LetusBray (thanks to Goatee for this name)... listening to the sound of your own voice has turned your mind into swiss cheese.

216.215.44.123

Believe me... as long as any other country has nukes, the US will. Don't think that the US will turn its back on any nuclear armed nation or let its guard down for a moment. This country has earned itself a lot of enemies over the years, and it would be unwise to compromise our position.

That is the unpleasant reality of this world. It takes only minutes from the time that a decision is made to the time when millions of people are vaporized. The warheads that aren't on ICBM's are still everywhere, and can turn up anywhere. Until that threat is gone, do not expect the US to relinquish its nuclear weapons.

"You can only fight one nightmare by becoming that same nightmare."

And even if prevail in that fight, you are still left with the same nightmare you started with.

All nukes need to be disposed of. How this will happen, well, I can think of one easy way, and one extremely difficult way.

Only one results in the survival of the species... and it isn't the easy way.

"""One should never get too overly complacent about killing zombies."""

I hear old vinyl records whipped at their heads can be quite effective.

Call them "worrisome incidents" then.

You got them. We don't. Russians don't. Chinese don't. Frenchies don't.

#20 | Posted by Tosser

Tosser-the Russkies and the chi-coms have a decent record of hiding their fuck-ups. Wouldn't bet the house that they haven't lost their share of bombs.

But hopefully, aflacshaheen will be able to get his hands on a nuke so bin laden can nuke some librul city like Chicago.

You're Iranian, Tosser.

Iranians are insulted at that suggestion...

...and Johnson squirms at the thought of his hated adversary being a member of the "Aryan Race".

Tosser-the Russkies and the chi-coms have a decent record of hiding their fuck-ups.


And America has a more than decent record of exposing Russian fuck-ups.


aflacshaheen


Who???

I keep hearing this name... who is this guy?

Iranians are insulted at that suggestion...


Iranians are insulted? No... I am insulted.

They are all emotional midgets.

The last thing I am, is emotional.

Aflacshaheen is the spawn of a mating between Ahmadinejad and Ann Coulter. If you haven't encountered it yet, count yourself as fortunate.

www.youtube.com

Look at these emotional idiots.

How dare he call me Iranian?

Donkey. LOL

The last thing I am, is emotional.

Live long and prosper...

Look at these emotional idiots.

And Pakistan is full of Vulcans... right. It must be that time when their mating drive kicks in and they get all violent...

Pakistani titty bar

www.youtube.com

Live long and prosper...


Yes.. quite. LOL

I have been called a cold fish.

If I had let emotions rule, I would be married by now.

But no... I've got logical brains enough to not commit voluntary suicide.

Pakistan at it's best.

And Pakistan is full of Vulcans... right. It must be that time when their mating drive kicks in and they get all violent...


In a pop of 172 million you get your share of nutters... but overall, the people who matter, don't ever get carried away.

That can also be dangerous... like they won't take any threat seriously... just analyze it until too late.

Pakistan at its worst?

I picked a story on Karachi for you...

I mean... if the Iranians were faced by a Taliban threat... they would have brought down the house by now. They are born hysterical drama-queens.

In Pakistan however... you monitor their food supply and weapons supply and choose the path of least resistance. LOL

Until a red line gets crossed.

Sometimes it is better to be a bit emotional.

In a pop of 172 million you get your share of nutters... but overall, the people who matter, don't ever get carried away.

Oh, I know all about the nutters. We have a population of over 300 million... and the DR is full of morons!

Fucking Mao. I see the words "titty bar" and click on the link. I saw no titties.

I picked a story on Karachi for you...


This one happened just as the operation against the TTP was started in Swat.

They tried to create trouble here but were rounded up in 24 hours.

I was never near the trouble spots and didn't see or hear anything.

BTW I enjoyed the techno soundtrack to your Ayatollah Rave video... whoever made that video needs a pat on the back.

Hilarious.

Then again, slapping yourself on the head does have special significance to the Shi'a, and you are talking a pontificating religious bastard.

We have them too. They're quite similar... check the googles...

They tried to create trouble here but were rounded up in 24 hours.

Good.

If you want to see pure logic, watch this.

www.youtube.com

One of the major incidents at the start of the 71 war.

A Bengali agent in our Air Force (flight instructor) hijacked a plane (disabled his student pilot) and tried to take it to India.

But the pilot woke up.

It's in english-urdu... you'll get the gist of it.

I guess he was saying "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few... or the one."

I guess he was saying "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few... or the one."


More or less. LOL

"But no... I've got logical brains enough to not commit voluntary suicide."

You're a muslim, it's only a matter of time.

You're a muslim, it's only a matter of time.


Leaving a Kaffir like you in peace?

No way, buddy.

Kaffir-Babu ... hahahahahahaha... Good one!

Where do I come up with them???

Well, the US is more or less at Pakistan's mercy when it comes to Afghanistan.

#24 | Posted by ZombieHunter

Only because the US continues to play by "The Rules." Keeping things conventional. Not trying to kill off too many "civilians." You and I both know that the US does have the capability to sweep that entire area of the planet clean, and not just with nukes. Bio and chem weapons would do the job quite well, and leave the "infrastructure" (such as it is in that part of the world) intact.

The NBC genies will be let out of their bottles soon enough. More than likely, it will be some little shit stain country trying to play at being Big Dog that will kick it all off. The Paks and the Indies were shaking their dicks at each other not so long ago.

Too many wankers out there fail to realize just how restrained the US has been. And despite the US's occasional dick swinging and incursions of its own, to a very great extent the US has acted as a buffer and a threat to those little shit stain countries that would like to swing their little dicks around and play the Big Dog.

Zit has dreams to keep his sanity.

It isn't how it is going to be little boy. Keep dreaming.

just how restrained the US has been.


As restrained as Obama felt bowing to Saudi Royalty? LOL

How can you bite the hand that feeds you?

Go make some annoyed noises... we will understand you are "annoyed"... then we will carry on as before, no change.

Bio and chem weapons would do the job quite well, and leave the "infrastructure" (such as it is in that part of the world) intact.

Go fuck yourself. Anyone who wants to use WMD on another country should be hauled off and shot.

How can you bite the hand that feeds you?

Develop alternative energy sources.

Develop alternative energy sources.


As long as the oil lobby lives, there won't be any real alternative energy tech. Nothing serious anyway.

America should be disarmed as soon as and as completely as possible.

#1 | Posted by Tosser

That has got to be the most stupid statement I have heard in a long time. A society that is disamred is at the mercy of every 300 pound gorlia in the world.

Why don't you disconnect your burgler alarm and put a great big sign in your front yard. "This is a gun free zone. No burgler alarm hooked up"

A society that is disamred is at the mercy of every 300 pound gorlia in the world.


Wrong in America's case.

America should disarm.... and then integrate itself into Canada.

You will have the respect of the entire planet.

Some of the best countries in the world... with the highest standards of living... are MILITARY PIPSQUEAKS.

I don't even have to name them. Too obvious.

No baby gorillas tearing them apart. LOL

Go fuck yourself. Anyone who wants to use WMD on another country should be hauled off and shot.

#77 | Posted by ZombieHunter

That wasn't nice at'all there, Zombie. Chill... I did not advocate the use of NBC weaponry. I merely stated that the US has the capability. The US though does continue to stay "conventional." Overtly... For now...

Go toss yerself, Wanker. You're so wack you're not worth responding rationally to.

Go toss yerself, Wanker.


Annoyed are we?

tch tch tch.....


you're not worth responding rationally to.


Sez one of the stupider ones here. LOL

I have seen you around but never noticed any deep thoughts out of you.

Has anyone else?

You got them. We don't. Russians don't. Chinese don't. Frenchies don't.

No, idiot. What we have is a free press and investigative journalism instead of decapitated reporters who dared to write stories about nuclear accidents.

So what was Chernoble, La Hauge, Mihama, Heilbronn, Kola, Paluel, Bruyere le Chatel, K-27, or K-19,...........?

"Pakistan has taken some steps since 2001 (In response to reports of an explosion at the Khushab nuclear facility) to increase transparency in its civilian nuclear program and it is a signatory to the Convention on Nuclear Safety," she said, "but none of those apply to its military program, so in many respects we are in the dark."

"In the dark" = "perfect record" LOL


Pakistan's military nuke program isn't open for public scrutiny.

Yours is.

Just shows how piss poorly you take the concept of security.

As far as anyone knows we have a perfect record.

What we have is a free press and investigative journalism


So does everyone else.

Have you forgotten this is the age of the internet and the blog?

What is DR if not freer than the freest press?


Pakistan's military nuke program isn't open for public scrutiny.


Yours is.


Just shows how piss poorly you take the concept of security.


As far as anyone knows we have a perfect record.

Posted by Tosser at 2009-05-13 03:47 PM | Reply

That just goes to show Me how chickenshit Pakistan is. At least We air our problems and are open and honest about it. You guys hide them away like so many children.

Larry

At least We air our problems and are open and honest about it.


Then you are fools and traitors to your country.

"So does everyone else."

Which world do you live on? What an utterly moronic statement. Cmon, Tosser, stooping to such statements only indicates you have lost the debate.


"Have you forgotten this is the age of the internet and the blog?"

Mention that to people who don't have access to the internet. Or does everyone, in your imaginery world, have that access?

Then you are fools and traitors to your country.

No, my little monkey.

We're just a free and pluralistic society.

Comes with our territory.

Much like filth, illiteracy, disease, civic impotence, and anarchy comes with yours.

... filth, illiteracy, disease, civic impotence, and voracious monkey-diddling.

Some call them "monkeys".

The "Paki proletariat" would be another synonym.

Um... after you nuke a country, you have to make sure you have enough nukes left over to take care of the radioactive zombies that will pop up after the fallout settles.

#12 | Posted by ZombieHunter

Is that what happened in Japan? Didn't they get two little ones because they didn't have enough sense to quit when they were loosing?

As far as anyone knows we have a perfect record.

Yeah, and that is exactly the same thing as "no accidents"!

Pakistan's military nuke program isn't open for public scrutiny.

Yours is.


Oh shit! I think Salad Tosser just accepted a premise not espoused by his despotic "government". One government is honest about its' problems, one "isn't open for public scrutiny". Now let's see if he can manage the rest on his own...

Anyone wanna bet he still scuffs the shot from 3 yards out?


Or does everyone, in your imaginery world, have that access?


I can only speak for Pakistan.

Yes, everyone with a phone (even a mobile phone) can get internet access.

Plus add a few million cybercafes to that.

It's enough for the truth not to be hidden.

Why do you think mainstream media.. not just in America.. but in most of the world... is not making the profits it used to?

The bloggers are choking it out.

We're just a free and pluralistic society.


No, you're not.

You were taken to a fake war and there wasn't shit you could do about it.

Hence, you are not free.



Much like filth, ...


Who's got swine flu???

Not me. hahahahahahahahahahaha

Yeah, and that is exactly the same thing as "no accidents"!


As far as you or anyone else is concerned... yes.

Though I am sure if there had ever been any incidents, it would have leaked out.

Things can't stay hidden forever.


Now let's see if he can manage the rest on his own...


It means you have a sloppy concept of security. It means you don't take nuclear weapons security seriously.

That sloppiness also carries forward to having more accidents.

"Paki proletariat"

I think they just call them "sweetheart".

But I don't think all Pakis are the China worshipping pimps that our token Asian is.

But I don't think all Pakis are the China worshipping pimps that our token Asian is.


I also don't think all Americans are as stoopid as you are.... but I am fast losing hope.


As am I.

Why do you think mainstream media

WHO do you think makes up the mainstream media? Paki journos?

The mainstream media can't have a free-for-all inside your borders. Access is limited to what your "government" allows. And like you said, your nuke program "isn't open to public scrutiny".

But even if it were open, anyone threatening the status quo would get 'Daniel Pearled' in the street.

I don't really expect you to understand the difference. Not just because you're stupid, but because a free society is something you can't really learn about on the internet, you have to live it. Maybe one day, if your people ever stop salivating about India long enough to gain true freedom, you'll understand. I hope so.

The mainstream media can't have a free-for-all inside your borders.


It's better than yours.

We don't lie about fake wars, now do we?

The Govt. having a read area when it comes to national security is no different than the American pres not being allowed inside Area 51.


anyone threatening the status quo would get 'Daniel Pearled' in the street.


Rubbish.

Daniel Pearl was an Isreali spy who got it in the neck. Perils of his job.

Hell with him.


I don't really expect you to understand the difference.


Despite what you say, I understand perfectly.

You can never answer how and why the American media got together to lie about what a fucking threat Iraq was with it's "WMD". LOL

One can read the Pakistani newspapers on the internet (both english and urdu) and watch some of our tv news channels online as well.

Anyone can see what is what and how they report the news.

There are no secrets.

If the American press was really free... it wouldn't be going into financial loss, now would it? LOL

There are no secrets.

Then why chop off that Israeli spy's head?

Then why chop off that Israeli spy's head?


Because he was stupid enough to switch off his phone and get into a taxi in the middle of the night with total strangers.

I don't know what that idiot thought himself to be, but James Bond, he wasn't.

You can never answer how and why the American media got together to lie about what a fucking threat Iraq was with it's "WMD".

It's extremely simple. Bush threw a bunch of dogs some bones. And the dogs gnawed at their bones until they realized that they were just hardened turds that had been spray painted white.

The media behaves predictably. If you give them a compelling "rationale" for war that presses all the right buttons, it will reverberate in the echo chamber and not really be examined in depth. People just repeat the same shit over and over, and make up the details.

As far as Pearl goes, I can understand why you want to call him a spy. That way his murder seems legitimate, and you don't have to admit that there are some uncouth barbarians operating with near impunity in your midst.

Is that what happened in Japan? Didn't they get two little ones because they didn't have enough sense to quit when they were loosing?

#95 | Posted by Sniper

It wasn't quite as pat as that. Not meaning to truly rathole this thread, but the dropping of the two nukes on Japan were more about the Soviets and their plans than beating down the already beaten Japanese.

Daniel Pearl was an Isreali spy

DUCK! My point just went whistling over your head!

I'll bet any reporter willing to write about, say, Khushab is an "Israeli spy" and gets one in the neck.

People just repeat the same shit over and over, and make up the details.


You and I are ... at least I am.. familiar enough with the inner workings of a major newspaper and TV news network to know something like THAT can't happen without an army of strategically placed shills.

Over here, shills are weeded out and disgraced.

In America, it seems that shills are honored and respected.

I can't name a single Pakistani Govt. shill from the top of my head.

Yet if I Google, I am sure I can give you a few American names.

Khushab is an "Israeli spy" and gets one in the neck.


There is enough Pakistani written info about Khushab-1, Khushab-2 and Khushab-3 out in the public.

And nobody was called an "isreali spy". LOL

As far as Pearl goes, I can understand why you want to call him a spy.


No... what I am saying is, I know he was killed by persons unknown.

But since he came with an Indian reporter, I am sure he was up to no good and whatever happened to him... I or anyone else... doesn't give a shit.

Here... let me tell you:

Khushab-1.

A military reactor. It is not connected to the grid. It makes plutonium, enough for 5 nukes a year.

Khushab-2.

A giant reactor. It is not connected to the grid. Whn it comes online later this year, it will make enough plutonium for 50 nukes a year.

Khushab-3.

Exact copy of Khushab-2.

Like I said, no Pak reporter was beheaded for "exposing" these reactors. LOL


There is enough Pakistani written info about Khushab

There were reports (from non-paki journos) of an explosion and gas leak. But your government said it was "scheduled maintenance". www.southasiaanalysis.org

Then some people turned up dead from radiation burns and the story changed to: "There is no threat to public life as all the leaking gas has been burnt in the flare system of the plant"www.abc.net.au

...as if radioactive leakage just "burns up" in a chimney!

That warm and fuzzy feeling you have for your 'honest, open government' is really radiation sickness you dolt.

There were reports (from non-paki journos) of an explosion and gas leak. But your government said it was "scheduled maintenance". www.southasiaanalysis.org


"The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India"

Indian article. Sorry, disregarded.

The first I read of it was from a local source which said one guy died because of an explosion in a pressurized coolant valve.

There was no radiation leakage.


That warm and fuzzy feeling you have for your 'honest, open government' is really radiation sickness you dolt.


I trust my Govt, because I know them and know when they are trying to lie.

The American Govt. on the other hand... you can't tell when your Govt. lies to you.

Iraq was proof of that.

See?

thenews.jang.com.pk

THIS is a Pakistani newspaper. They were the first to report.

If the local press hadn't mentioned it, nobody in the foreign press would have known as foreigners are not allowed in the area.

KHUSHAB: A cylinder of hydrogen phosphate gas blew up in a nuclear plant near Chawk Groat on Tuesday, the whole area atmosphere was soon permeated with poisonous gas, according to the preliminary reports.

According to sources, all the crew have been ordered to evacuate the site. Many people are reported to have fainted.

According to sources, the hydrogen phosphate is a very dangerous gas, therefore, the whole area is seen terror-stricken and people are rushing out from the area.

Hydrogen phosphate wasn't radioactive.

This was a gas leak, not a radiation leak.

And no mention in the local pres of someone dying. Only in the Indian media (which always exaggerates about anything to do with Pakistan).

Oh Buoy, it is the "India's out to get us" routine. This of course is the stand-by excuse for times where, "it's the Jew's fault" doesn't work.

There were reports (from non-paki journos) of an explosion and gas leak. But your government said it was "scheduled maintenance".


Read below:

"It is learnt that the Chinese-supplied Chashma nuclear power station in Pakistan..."


The Chashma reactor.. Chashma-1, Chashma-2 and the future Chashma-3-and-4.. are not near Khushab.

The Chashma reactors are under international safeguards and are inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

An accident over there CAN NOT be hidden.

It turned out it really was about maintenance. The reactor was back online.

Oh Buoy, it is the "India's out to get us" routine


In post no.122, I just proved to you, the Indian news was bullshit. A reactor with safeguards can't keep secrets.

It just can't happen.

So you see, anything the Indians write on Pakistan, has a "spin".

I am sure you know what "spin" is, yeah? ahahahahahaha

YOU are confusing Chashma with Khushab.

They are not the same.

Chasma reactors are safeguarded.

Khushab reactors are secret military only. No safeguards.

No, you are. I'm talking about Khushab, that's why I mentioned it by name and the first line of the article I linked says "Khushab".

Be thankful, this is the part where 'you win' because news of the "explosion" can't be verified (convenient for you) because the State controls information......which brings us back to the original point: When you don't have an open government, free press, and journos get wacked in the street and called "spies", you never know what the hell is going on. You seem fine with that, which is what I'd expect from a person beaten down by despots their whole life. Frankly, I'm grateful for your crackpot warlords, they do the dirty business of keeping you mutts in line fairly well, and they are not quite stupid enough to ever use a jew-bomb (assuming they work).

And there you have it....

I linked says "Khushab".


It sez "Chashma". read it again.

It is learnt that the Chinese-supplied Chashma nuclear power station in Pakistan,

Are you blind???

The Khushab incident was reported by the local press.

You are now only lying after I refuted everything you could come up with.

Rubbish from an ill-informed American.

The jury shall disregard.

ACORN: What are we going to do about this corrupt organization?

You got caught confusing the Chashma reactors with the Khushab reactors, even though they are light-years apart.

Well, even if you can't see it... everyone here can see logically, you have no idea what you are mouthing off about.

Your case is closed.

The jury shall disregard any further outbursts. LOL

a person beaten down by despots their whole life


I have never been "beaten down by despots".. I don't even know what the fuck that means. LOL

In YOUR case, however, must I remind you how many of your stinking men and women in uniform are getting killed because a man who "stole an election... twice" sent you to a fake war?

hahahahahahaha

Who is getting beaten pup? Whose leaders are getting WHO killed?

In many circles, Bush qualified as a "despot".

Amreekan retard.

Now back on topic.

1. America should be disarmed.

2. America should have no business being near nukes.

3. America has the most accidents with nuke-weapons.

4. No other country can match America's sloppy record.

5. The argument that America reports more accidents because it is a "free country" is pure nonsense. The fact is, serious accidents happened. Such accidents do not happen to others.

6. The fact that no other country has reported any of their accidents, does not necessarily mean that they are hiding them. Besides, in this day and age, one can't hide stuff anyway. If people get killed because of a radiation leak... the world will know. Period.

How am I doing so far?

We won't disarm until You do Tosser.

I have also refuted the silly argument that one idiot Googled up about an incident.

It was first reported in the local press. No hiding. (see link to news report)

If there had been any serious accidents in Pakistan with nuclear weapons, I am sure we would all have known.

We won't disarm until You do Tosser.


Don't.

You will only keep losing technical secrets (if you still got any left.. LOL) to people like us.

How many security breaches in Los-Almos, up to now?

I lost count. hahahahahaha

The truth about Pak nukes
By Irfan Asghar | Published: May 14, 2009

At the moment, the international community is experiencing a lot of paranoia about the vulnerability of Pakistan's nuclear stockpile. Some international affinity groups are painting nightmare scenarios in the event of extremists taking up the reins of Pakistan. Even Americans have got schizophrenic and are blowing hot and cold about Pakistan's nukes. If we have a sober reflection and non-partisan analysis, it comes out loud and clear that all these statements are hallucinatory observations and nothing short of being comical and off-key. The patent reality is that various international lobbies are doing a 'hatchet job' on Pakistan.

Before having a detailed discussion about Pakistan's foolproof safeguards over nuclear weapons, the writer wants to ask the international community an important question: Why the international community did not raise hue and cry and where was America's own command and control system when its Air Force unknowingly flew a bunch of nuclear weapons on a B-52 bomber across the country in August 2007. The weapons were left at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana for 36 hours with none of the special security required for nuclear devices.

Those who live in glasshouses, should not hurl stones at others.

As far as the security of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is concerned, it has made great strides in this regard. Its custodial arrangements in the domain of nuclear weapons are the best in the world. The security system is as good as that of any other nuclear state. Adequate safeguards have been institutionalized and there is not even a scintilla of ambiguity in the effectiveness of the command and control system over nuclear weapons programme. All this is because Pakistan is a responsible state which is fully mindful of the nuclear rules. It possesses entire protective hardware, has installed top-notch security system and made sure that only a very small group of authorized users can arm and detonate a nuclear weapon. The system is hundred percent fool-proof as it requires the would-be user to enter a numeric code that starts a timer for the weapon's arming and detonation. In addition to this, the nukes in Pakistan are not maintained on a hair-trigger alert. In times of peace the various parts of nukes are kept separately and the warheads are stored at a distance from the delivery system. In case of any emergency, the Pakistan Air Force has transport aircraft that can easily fly components of nuclear weapons to their relevant destinations for final assembly.

More arrogant bloviations ehhhhhh Tosser. Why am I not surprised.

Larry

Why am I not surprised.


Because you are a dullard?

I think I remember YOU.. Larry... saying "You said said you are a Pathan! Before that you said you were Asian! You lie!" (Pathans are more Asian than most)

LOL... Yeah... dullard.

Did you think I had forgotten???

Larry?

Dullard?

And yesterday, you dared to suggest you wanted to be my friend. ("I did my best to be civil to you")

WHY would I want to have YOU as a friend??? LOL


And yesterday, you dared to suggest you wanted to be my friend. ("I did my best to be civil to you")


WHY would I want to have YOU as a friend??? LOL

Posted by Tosser at 2009-05-13 06:51 PM | Reply

You are a bald faced liar. You declare that I wanted You to be My friend. What rubbish. It was You who stated that We were friends and allies. I made the comment with friends like You who needs enemies. Typical worthless fuck

Larry

Now back on topic.

Okay.

1. America should be disarmed.

No they shouldn't.

Especially when despotic, third world shitholes with unstable and/or tyrannical governments like Pakistan and North Korea have them as well.

2. America should have no business being near nukes.

America is the only country with any business possessing nukes.

3. America has the most accidents with nuke-weapons.

That continues to be simply an assertion you've pulled from your swarthy, ignorant little ass.

4. No other country can match America's sloppy record.

That continues to be simply an assertion you've pulled from your swarthy, ignorant little ass.

5. The argument that America reports more accidents because it is a "free country" is pure nonsense. The fact is, serious accidents happened. Such accidents do not happen to others.

The argument that America reports more mishaps with nuclear weapons is due to the fact that America is an open society with a free press. Many other significant nations with nuclear weapons are closed, totalitarian societies without free presses. Furthermore, your assertion that "such accidents do not happen to others" has been shown to be utter bullshit (see above).

6. The fact that no other country has reported any of their accidents, does not necessarily mean that they are hiding them.

Except other countries have had accidents with nuclear weapons, didn't report them at the time, and kept them secret only to be revealed decades later.

So there goes that little cunt-waft attempt at a "point", as well.

How am I doing so far?

About the same as you were 24 hours ago.

So if your intent is to exhibit your own tedious stupidity and stunted grasp of basic reality that comes with being the product of an indigent third-world nation, you're doing great!

Other than that, you're just a babbling Sally-Struthers poster boy trying to convince his intellectual and cultural superiors that "black" is really "white" because goats have no flippers.

Makes for great entertainment, but little else.

Hope that helps, Khan.

"Leaving a Kaffir like you in peace?"

#72 | Posted by Tosser at 2009-05-13 02:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Of course i'm a kaffir.

No sane person on Earth would follow a "religion" invented out of whole cloth by a pedophile warlord.

No sane person on Earth would follow a "religion" invented out of whole cloth by a pedophile warlord.

#144 | Posted by babuenthal


Out of whole cloth? What I've read and heard about the Qur'an it's pretty much plagiarized from the Hebrew Bible. Makes me wonder why they can't get along better.

"No sane person on Earth would follow a "religion" invented out of whole cloth by a pedophile warlord."

Posted by babuenthal at 2009-05-13 10:22 PM

Mohammad actually existed, Jesus is a myth for stupid people.
Not that it makes a bit of difference.

Hope that helps, Khan.

KHAAAAAAN!

Can't superman just throw the goddamn things into the sun?

Mohammad actually existed, Jesus is a myth for stupid people.
Not that it makes a bit of difference.

#146 | Posted by Zatoichi

Lightning was crated for what???

Mohammad actually existed, Jesus is a myth for stupid people.
Not that it makes a bit of difference.

#146 | Posted by Zatoichi

FYI-Jesus is a prophet in the religion of the Prophet Mohamed. Even those much maligned Islamic extremists believe he existed. Your spin on this one?

What I've read and heard about the Qur'an it's pretty much plagiarized from the Hebrew Bible. Makes me wonder why they can't get along better.


That is what the Koran wonders.

"Mohamed... tell them I am the same God who was the God of Jesus and Moses. Then ask them what is your major malfunction???" (my translation...)

It really does say that.

It was You who stated that We were friends and allies.


And we are. It is official. Pak-USA are buddies.

YOU however... you are to be kept at arm's length. LOL

Except other countries have had accidents with nuclear weapons, didn't report them at the time, and kept them secret only to be revealed decades later.


See... truth always comes out.

America has had the most accidents with nuclear weapons. Most have not had any.

These things can't be kept secret and the picture is clear now.

For a country that is more accident-prone than the Russians... they have no business being near nukes.

America is an open society with a free press.


No it isn't.

America is a society with a manipulated and irresponsible lying press.


your assertion that "such accidents do not happen to others" has been shown to be utter bullshit


No.

America has the most accidents involving nuclear weapons.

I am not including any incidents other have had with their reactors.

We are talking weapons alone.

Of course i'm a kaffir.


Kaffir-babu.... LOL


intellectual and cultural superiors


Where? Where? LOL

After all is said and done, the US is going to disarm thanks to Obaba. He obviously understands the need to take these things away from American hands.

Nobody else is disarming.

2.The US has had a number of accidents involving their nukes over the decades. Pakistan has never had an accident.

#3 | Posted by Tosser at 2009-05-13 01:29 AM | Reply | Flag:


Riiiiiiiight. Becuse they never told you so it must have never happened! Sure, because the press is just SO FREE in that shithole known as Pakistan.

America has the most accidents involving nuclear weapons.

No, little primate.

It does not.

America is an open society with a free press.

LOL!

I bet fox news believes that after they fired the two reporters because they wouldn't lie about a story they investigated.

Not sure you understand the meaning.

Sure, because the press is just SO FREE in that shithole known as Pakistan.


It is freer than it is in the US.

Pakistani newspapers never lied to take the country to fake war, now did they?

American newspapers... under Govt. pressure... lied all over the place about WMDs.

So much for freedom.... The shithole known as Amreeka doesn't have a leg to stand on. LOL

American media is "fair and balanced".

We all know what THAT means. hahahahahaha

No, little primate.

It does not.


Yes, little Khanzeer.

It does.

The Koran writes about Jack-me-off.... "And God turned them into swine..." LOL

I repeat. Pakistan has NEVER had an accident involving nuclear weapons. (such things can't remain hidden)

The US has had many.

Whose nukes should be taken away???

Do you trust a diseased people having their fingers on the button?

Of course not!

American swine-flu is now a defining picture of the dangerous times we live in.

An American infected with swine-flu can not make the correct decisions regarding a nuke.

Sick people have no business being near these weapons.

"I can only speak for Pakistan."

Yet you state that _everyone_ has internet access: "So does everyone else."

"Yes, everyone with a phone (even a mobile phone) can get internet access."

Which is immensely different than "So does everyone else." isn't it.


"America has the most accidents involving nuclear weapons."

Russia can't account for 10% (or more) of their nuclear weapons. That doesn't qualify? They've also lost nucleat warheads like the 1977 K-171 sub incident, had a reconnaisance satellite with a nuclear reactor break up over Canada and spill nuclear fuel, etc.

Information pertaining to China's nuclear program is very highly classified, yet you can unequivocally state that they haven't had any accidents? Anti-nuclear activists say otherwise and they have as much credibility as you.

Also, France has had several incidents in the Pacific during their testing. It was in their newspapers in the 1980s.

Nations do _not_ like to divulge info when they have an accident of any kind re weapons. Such info only leaks out if/when some news outfit finds it. Yet you can state unequivocally that only the U.S. had accidents. Wow, Tosser, you've topped yourself there.

So much for freedom.... The shithole known as Amreeka doesn't have a leg to stand on. LOL

#160 | Posted by Tosser

You seem to be trying to hold up Pakistan as a fine easygoing and straight up place and people. Outside of trying to make friends and influence people, just how do you know Pakistan's state secrets or that of any other countries?

I do have to say that of all of the cultural groups that I have been involved with, the people of Pakistan rate at or near the bottom. I don't care to even be around them as they aren't worth the trouble they seem to carry with them.

I don't care to even be around them as they aren't worth the trouble they seem to carry with them.

They're kinda stinky, too.

Well, there is that....

I do have to say that of all of the cultural groups that I have been involved with, the people of Pakistan rate at or near the bottom. I don't care to even be around them as they aren't worth the trouble they seem to carry with them.


Sez an American. LOL

Americans are the source of most of the troubles on this planet.

You are terrorist magnets. Nobody likes to stand in the same line as you, God knows when the bullets will start flying....

They're kinda stinky, too.


Sez an American who carry the smell of beer and urinals.

You seem to be trying to hold up Pakistan as a fine easygoing and straight up place and people.


It's exactly that for me.

For you... it will be something else. LOL

Russia can't account for 10% (or more) of their nuclear weapons. That doesn't qualify?


Well... yeah, that does qualify...

Why didn't you say so before?

Sez a subhuman monkey who carries the smell of goat and curry.

P.S. - Urinals aren't that bad when you have running water.

You should try it sometime, Khan.

Information pertaining to China's nuclear program is very highly classified, yet you can unequivocally state that they haven't had any accidents?


Bottom line is, Russia had the most control over it's media... hell what media?

Still things got out.

If anything had happened in China, it would've got out. Other stuff from China keep getting out, doesn't it?

As far as we know, China and Pakistan, have never had an accident with nuclear weapons.

But I accept your argument partially.

Destroy Russia's weapons too as well as America's.

Happy?

P.S. - Urinals aren't that bad when you have running water.


So you are happy smelling like a urinal...


Sez a subhuman monkey who carries the smell of goat and curry.


Beef. This is beef country, punk. We don't eat goat all that much.

Amreekan-Khanzeer. LOL

Which is immensely different than "So does everyone else."


Not when you've got over 90 million mobile phones out of a population of 172 million.

And millions of landlines. And free internet all over the country (dial-up only).

www.ptcl.com.pk

Broadband internet, you get to pay for. LOL

Point is... there is enough damn internet out there for anyone to call bullshit on the traditional media.

In this thread, what I have found amusing is how much insecure Americans feel if they think their nukes are being disarmed.

And they feel specially lousy if they think they should be the only ones targeted for disarming.

They reacted exactly how I thought they would... trying to avoid the issue with whining, silly juvenile insults that used to work in kindergarten (you smell!) and outright denials.

You guys are what you see is what you get. LOL. And no.. that isn't a good thing.

So good luck with your nukes.

I am not the enemy of your nukes.

Your Obama is. LOL

"If anything had happened in China, it would've got out." - Tosser

China has and still does conduct its nuclear in remote areas and doesn't allow access. And, like Israel, arrests and "disappears" anyone who tries to poke their nose into the issue. Yet rumours have circulated for years about various accidents. As I mentioned, anti-nuke activists, who have as much credibility as you, have brought this up multiple times.

The one thing which seems to be very much be a rule is that if you have nukes which actually work (unlike Paki's), you will have incidents. While the USSR existed, they had multiple accidents yet kept insisting they had none. If the USSR had not collapsed that would still have been the situation - and you would have insisted that they are correct.

"And millions of landlines. And free internet all over the country (dial-up only)."

All over the country - even in the Taliban controlled areas?

Hate to break it to you, but there are very many areas of the world which have no phone service. Even in Eastern Europe many people have no phones. Limited land lines, very limited cell-phone coverage. In South America it is just as bad. In Africa it is even worse. I wonder how many poor people in Asia have phones. Even in the U.S. quite a large number of people do not have internet service.

"what I have found amusing is how much insecure Americans feel if they think their nukes are being disarmed."

No, many Americans would be ok with the U.S. getting rid of their nukes - if the rest of the world did also. They realize that the U.S. has by far the best military of any country in the world. There is nation in the world which can defeat the U.S. in a WWII style war. And there won't be for many years to come. And most of the world takes that for granted and as a positive. Sorry to disillusion you.

even in the Taliban controlled areas?


The very first thing they do is cut comms. Internet, cable.. they hate it all. And if they see a mobile phone in your hand, they take it away.


I wonder how many poor people in Asia have phones.


Depends where in Asia.

There is nation in the world which can defeat the U.S. in a WWII style war.


Which is why you won't be in a WW2 style conflict.


if you have nukes which actually work (unlike Paki's), you will have incidents.


They work. India sez they do and they better know. LOL

And no.. I am quite sure, we have had no accidents involving nukes.

Until it is reported we have had.. we haven't.

No, many Americans would be ok with the U.S. getting rid of their nukes


Doesn't seem to be the case in this thread, now does it?

Relax... it was just a mind game I was playing. I am not coming to take your nukes away. LOL

Even in the U.S. quite a large number of people do not have internet service.


You don't need everyone to get internet service. You just need a certain threshold to get it. Just enough for the mainstream media to start quoting stuff from the net or YouTube.

These days, I am seeing more and more stories in the Pakistani papers that have this sentence.. "and as seen on YouTube, Mr.X admitted he was.... "

When the mainstream press starts quoting the internet, you know who has the power.

Want to see the power the internet has in Pakistan? (or elsewhere?)

Watch this:

www.youtube.com

This guy was the Chairman of the CBR. That is what in the US would be the head of the IRS. The top tax-chief of the country.

Someone took this video of him dancing like a whore and put it on YouTube.

He lost his job a week later. LOL

"They work. India sez they do and they better know."

Wow, you believe your enemy? And I thought you were gullible because you believed your military. Still, if it makes you feel better ... ROFLMAO

"Which is why you won't be in a WW2 style conflict."

Yet it is why, aside from the "America ueber Alles" crowd, Americans wouldn't care if all the nukes in the world were disarmed.

"Doesn't seem to be the case in this thread, now does it?"

That would be the "America ueber Alles" crowd, not Americans in general. Sorry to disabuse you. But have fun. The U.S. isn't going to disarm the fake Paki nukes either.

Wow, you believe your enemy?


We hear them fine when they talk amongst themselves.

If you still have doubts, you may think of Pakistani nukes to be closest in design to French nukes, seeing we got most of our tech from them.

So, yeah. They work.


The U.S. isn't going to disarm the fake Paki nukes either.


Then stop crying over them. Why is your media going crazy "what if taliban get their nukes!".

Tell them it's all fake, so I can get my nap in peace.

"America ueber Alles"


Whatever the hell THAT means....


That would be the "America ueber Alles" crowd, not Americans in general.


And why are they all here?

Because they are the majority.

"you may think of Pakistani nukes to be closest in design to French nukes"

The French are aware - and are laughing, though they are too haughty to roll on the floor while doing it.


"Why is your media going crazy "what if taliban get their nukes!"."

Because once the Taliban get them, they will make them work. The Taliban are smarter than the Pakis.

Americans wouldn't care if all the nukes in the world were disarmed.


Nope. Your nukes are like your pacifier.. or your security blankee....

Take it away, baby starts crying.

I wanted to see this for myself on this thread... and I did. You people proved true to type.

Go on... read from the top. LOL

Because once the Taliban get them, they will make them work. The Taliban are smarter than the Pakis.


And it's back to Kindergarten... LOL

You guys are so predictable.

Now don't be sore.

Chill.

I got what I wanted and saw what I wanted to see. There was another person who disagreed with me, but I proved him wrong. So I am 100 Rupees richer. LOL

"And why are they all here? Because they are the majority."

Some look but they do not see. Some listen but they do not understand. Some make erroneous assumptions because they are Pakis.

"And it's back to Kindergarten..."

No, I don't think you need go that far back.

Some look but they do not see. Some listen but they do not understand. Some make erroneous assumptions because they are Pakis.


I'm afraid I know you lot better than you know yourselves.

The 100 Rupees I won, proves that.

"Nope. Your nukes are like your pacifier.. or your security blankee...."

See post # 197.

No, I don't think you need go that far back.


And now, boys and girls, we shall have a back and forth of juvenile insults trying to see whose cock is larger...

The American will refuse to settle down until he is granted an "honorable out".

"I'm afraid I know you lot better than you know yourselves. The 100 Rupees I won, proves that."

The one dollar I won proves otherwise. I was hoping to win more, but I couldn't get anybody to take the side that Pakis know anything. I even tried sub-Saharan Africans.

"The American will refuse to settle down until he is granted an "honorable out"."

Unlike the Paki who knows he has lost before he began so doesn't have to worry about it.

The one dollar I won proves otherwise. I was hoping to win more, but I couldn't get anybody to take the side that Pakis know anything. I even tried sub-Saharan Africans.


And I give you your "honorable out" by letting you have the last insult.

Now go to sleep.

"And I give you your "honorable out" by letting you have the last insult."

We AI's don't care about insults but we do appreciate your emotional sentiments. We also don't sleep, especially at 3:30PM.

Never.
1.We have a legitimate need. America doesn't.
2.The US has had a number of accidents involving their nukes over the decades. Pakistan has never had an accident.
3.If US and Russia has been India and Pakistan for a day, they would have nuked each other that day. We, as you can see, are far more responsible.
#3 | Posted by Tosser at 2009-05-13 01:29 AM

What a mistake.

Live by nuclear weapons, die by them.

I know you are proud of your heritage, and I want modernization to complement your culture, but there are too many fanatics inside of your own government (and India's) to permit anything short of international disarmament.

You pose a rather easy target - lose the nukes and shed some weight.

Tosser - Why do you think the Taliban are infecting your government?

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable