If he associates with 2 groups of people who think he is immoral, what does that say about the 3rd?
#57 | Posted by Manypaths
A better question might be, 'what does it say about the 2 groups that do think he is immoral'? This is especially true when I know the man is a beacon of thought and spritual reflection.
Many, I may slop this up, but you need to understand something. Everything is inside the man. His external oaths and obligations are for others benefit. Who he is inside is for him and his creator to know.
I may think that a hard-working man is more honest than a non-hard-working man. Then i can disprove that point based on one transaction. I may think a mason is more honest than a non-mason, but i can find instances where this is not true either.
I will tell you as a mason, a 32nd degree mason and a shriner that I am a nasty-minded, nasty-mouthed, anti-religion realist(which is not your 'typical' mason, for sure).
I only care about idealism and philosophy. I do not care about anyone elses ideas of morals or society or any of that. I would leave the masonic order so fast it would make it's head swim if I found a conflict between what i believe and what the organization is based on.
But you know what? I haven't found one. I also haven't found a reason why any honest and good man would find fault with it, outside some extremist religious teachings.
If you make a deal, a deal is a deal, no matter if the other participant is the preacher of the 1st baptist church or an atheist or a mason or a member of the garden club. The kinetic purity of that deal will speak volumns about the participants.