Way to go murph! Rush uses oxygen that could better be used by a colony of pubic lice.

Thankfully, mother nature has recently supplied Her answer to address the excessive numbers of bloated conservative pigs floating around in the US... unfortunately it is rather indiscriminate.

.... bloated conservative pigs floating around in the US...

So - where IS Fat Liberal Abert Gore these days? Jetting?

Murphy said WHAT???

Oh...wrong Murphy.

Murphy said WHAT???

Oh...wrong Murphy.

Yes this Murphy was a clear thinking Patriot!

"Just imagine the hue and cry had a Republican president ordered the shooting of black teenagers on the high seas," Limbaugh said.

Just imagine if a Democratic president hadn't. Limbaugh would be accusing Obama of being weak, incompetent, in league with terrorists and a threat to national security. Oh, wait. . . .

The question arises, will Rush will be able to leave this fellow alone because he spoke his mind, or will he attempt to grind his chariot wheels over him?

Anyone note what's happened to Levi after the Tyra Banks Show? Not a Limbaugh hit job but one conducted by one of the greatest of Limbaugh fans, Erik Erikson.

So - where IS .. Gore ...
#2 | Posted by Greatamerican

Wow - from Limbaugh to Gore in 2 posts.
Way to keep on topic.....

Thankfully, mother nature has recently supplied Her answer to address the excessive numbers of bloated conservative pigs floating around in the US

Unfortunately, she also supplies droves of idiots like you to elect hypocritical pigs like this that float around the US:

The only "contribution" the right's made to this thread are two deflections. I guess Rush's bullshit was too much for even them.

"Unfortunately, she also supplies droves of idiots like you to elect hypocritical pigs like this that float around the US:

Obama Burned 9,000 Gallons of Jet Fuel for One Earth Day Speech

Is there any more stupidity still stored in that pea brain that you want to share?"

That's right Cookfish the president should fly coach and wait in line like everyone else.

What an idiot.

Of course mouth breathers like you are against any environmental protections since it is all faked information by the left to control your white trash ass, isn't it?

Shane Murphy lashes out at Rush - -
yikes . . . get the guy some shore leave & a woman

I guessing last time he was off the ship sarcasm & parody had not yet been invented

The more the liberal hate mongers try to destroy Limbaugh, the more he is proving to be a teflon radio host.

"The more the liberal hate mongers try to destroy Limbaugh"

And there we have it, Takesit shows up to defend Rush and in doing so says Shane Murphy, one of the victims, is a hate monger.

JH (#13), that is not a defense; it is an observation.

If Rush was born black would even his mother listen to him?

Man, Rush really fills the hole that your fathers left in your lives, doesn't he?

As human beings it is your responsibility to GET OVER your childhood. Stop seeking a replacement for your father, and for the love of God stop seeking it in Rush Limbaugh. He doesn't want to play catch with you, or get ice cream with you, he doesn't even like you. He is using you. For sex.

Gal wonders, "Just imagine if a Democratic president hadn't."

Well, whatever Limbaugh had said, the collective response would be the same, and similar to this:

"bloated conservative pigs floating around in the US..."

The Democrats would defame and revile as they always do, and project that hatred and bigotry onto their political opponents.

You know this, and yet foster the hatred, in your mealymouthed way ...

Rush gets alot of publicity for a comedian. His PR firm is fantastic.

Liberals are doing priceless advertising for Rush... beginning with Obama administration when whey went after him instead of Osama Bin Laden.... a glimpse into the priorities of Rahm Immanuel.

Kinda fun watching many of the right-wingers on this board self-destruct these days.

#19 | POSTED BY TAKITEZ

For 7 years Bush couldn't care less about OBL and now you find fault with the new administration for lagging on the issue after just 100 days. Are you serious?

I suspect that the slain Somali "pirates" probably were teen-age daddies trying to put food in the mouths of their starving children. But not for a moment do I suspect that Rush Limpballs had the brains or the integrity to recognize that. herm

Post #21.... I'm simply pointing out that the first 100 days of Obama's admin included destroying Rush a priority....

And I don't understand what TakeIt is trying to say. herm

TN asks, "Are you serious?"

Are you? It wasn't that long after the NATO action in Afghanistan before the Leftish ilk were demanding his *capture*!

By now, most of those without the mental deficiency of dogs would have understood that bin Laden is dead as ham steaks ... but NOOOOOO!

Not the pathetic disher outers of the Left, who can't stand *ANY* of the very same medicine their gang of verbal baton wielding, saluting in unison antipatriots put out, themselves!

Faint hearted, yellow bellies ...

I find it amusing how TakiTez returns every few weeks to get his stupid ass handed to him. What a completely ignorant prick. Either that or he's a masochist.

I must have done something right....

Tadowe was a Democrat until the hippies made a mess of the Chicago convention in '68. Just wanted to point that out.

I must have done something right....

In your mind, punishment is desirable.

Tadowe was a Democrat until LBJ's military kicked his sorry ass out.

Ron remarks, "Tadowe was a Democrat until the hippies made a mess of the Chicago convention in '68. Just wanted to point that out."

Actually, those individuals, when not rioting, are exercising their free speech. I have not objections to that.

What I find base and utterly disgusting is the effort by the Democrats (their leadership and those who voted along with them) to abandon our ally to the tyranny of communist imperialism. Removing funds for their defense was the act evil. Democrats, after all, had involved them in the buildup of the North, and the impossiblity of fighting without our support.

Kennedy massively increased forces in 'Nam, some of whom were involved in combat operations; specially flying combat bombing and ground support. Then, Johnson brought hundreds of thousands of US troops and massive supplies to 'Nam, forcing the North into a massive response.

Then, the political cowards, for miserly greed and personal power, left our friend to die, while we had the means to save them ...

The same effort has been their aim, to abandon a new friend in the field, for greed and political gain: Iraq and the last 8 years of calumny to lose that war and gain votes for doing so.

The Democrats have become a party of greed and revenge ... anti-patriots for votes and political power ... the worst sort of tyrant wannabes ... literal vermin of politics.

I don't hate "hippies," I hate lever-pulling, yellow dog democrat cowards ...

Oh come now, tadowe, you hate everyone who doesn't think like you. It's a natural response for a party that supports hate and fear mongering over diplomacy.

We are not all of the same mold. We have a system of majority rules and when hate mongers like Rush Limbaugh preach against a President who was elected by popular vote, it reflects poorly on anyone who buys into his sick vision for America. Rush, like Cheney, is a sorry ass fat pig who hates 2 out of 3 of his fellow citizens simply because he disagrees with their political philosophy. What are you anyway, a man or a cockroach looking for shit? I suspect the latter.

Ring grasps, "... you hate everyone who doesn't think like you. It's a natural response for a party that supports hate and fear mongering over diplomacy."

It is inevitable that some sophomore will come in and make me the subject, not that you're the first in this thread. Your hyperbole is extremely jejune and nothing more than another display of your lack of experience in reasoning a discussion.

"We are not all of the same mold."

More callow hyperbole and misdirection - because you are fitting the "shoe" I describe onto your #10, left foot, with this reply.

"We have a system of majority rules and when hate mongers like Rush Limbaugh preach against a President who was elected by popular vote, it reflects poorly on anyone who buys into his sick vision for America."

Oh, what drivel! You disingenuously pretend that the Leftwing, Democrats and Air America stuffed-shirts weren't demeaning Bush for 8 years? What does it matter how "popular" this know-nothing president is to you? The other half of America thinks he is the worst thing to happen to the USA, since the Democrats elected the genocidal murderer, Andrew Jackson to be president!

"Rush, like Cheney, is a sorry ass fat pig who hates 2 out of 3 of his fellow citizens simply because he disagrees with their political philosophy."

See? 2/3? What rank BS! You revile body image as support for your disagreement with Limbaugh. It is fear that permits you to timidly avoid that Rush is not a "racist" for asking his rhetorical "question."

A "question" which the yellow-dogs, in their lickspittle way, tear and and nag, as if it were a real live *POLAR BEAR* ... oh, wait, not one of those the Leftist liars fib about ... no, it has to be a real live *RAT* ... right?

That's, after all, the logic of the Left - defame and revile them for their looks ... and avoid any need for thought or reasoning ... that's the Yellow-Dog-Democrat way, after all ... no thinking, just yapping ...

... if the ilk aren't lapping-up some new propagandistic vomit from the big-dogs at this site ...

The same effort has been their aim, to abandon a new friend in the field, for greed and political gain: Iraq and the last 8 years of calumny to lose that war and gain votes for doing so #31 | Posted by tadowe

Excuse me. Are we talking about the last 8 years? Are you even remotely serious? Was it the Dems that caused the Iraq war to be lost, or is it more likely that you are just a goofball, history revisionist? The Dems are at fault, even though the flunky GOP President usurped Congress at every possible turn, pressuring them to vote for the bullshit Iraq war, else be be branded as terrorist-lovers and 9/11 traitors, as George simultaneously declared himself unlimited war powers as Commander in Thief for 7 years? Was it those Democrats, genius? Like it was the Democrats that traded away the Constitution with government spying without judicial review, that sent the Founding Fathers spinning in their graves? Like it was the Democrats who manipulated bogus intelligence to build trumped-up WMD charges against SH, to later be revealed as a pure sham? Like anybody who wanted to reveal the truth was attacked by a rabid administration, such as the retaliation against someone's wife who happened to be a CIA agent. Yeah, the Dems did that, douchebag. And like it was the Democrats that ignored military brass and went to war in Iraq without enough troops to prevent an insurgency, which killed thousands more American troops than had it been done the right way? You Tadowe, are a pathetic, brainwashed moron, who lives in a self-induced fantasyland. Luckily, the facts are all against you, thus your accusations are just sooooo transparent and debunked with ease.

You revile body image as support for your disagreement with Limbaugh.

Body image?

Ooh-la-la. Sounds like somebody's been fer "sensitivity training" recently.

Tell us, Tad. Was it court ordered? ^_^

Admittedly just a guess, no hard evidence there.

It is fear that permits you to timidly avoid that Rush is not a "racist" for asking his rhetorical "question."

No, Rush is a racist fer making a large number of racist remarks over the years.

Plenty of evidence there.

At this point trying to make the case that Rush is not a racist would be very difficult indeed if not impossible.

You disingenuously pretend that the Leftwing, Democrats and Air America stuffed-shirts weren't demeaning Bush for 8 years?

Noticing that Bush was demeaning and ruining the country for 8 years is not quite the same thing as demeaning Bush.

Credit where credit is due.

Otherwise ya get demerits.

Be Well.

Are you even remotely serious?

Mad Tad is dead serious and quite, quite insane.

The ideologue's ideologue.

Be Well.

New rants, "... Was it the Dems that caused the Iraq war to be lost, or is it more likely that you are just a goofball, history revisionist?"

Not for want of trying, but Democrats did not lose the war and since it has been "won" for years - are you simply (in all its pejorative sense) projecting the accusation of "revisionist?"

"... Like it was the Democrats that traded away the Constitution with government spying without judicial review ..."

Well, here is one of the ilk who just can't get the present "news!"

What a dimwit! Obama just got through condoning the same programs and "spying!" No wonder your party is in such trouble - you idiots literally WILL NOT hear anything you don't want to "hear." 3-Monkey politics is the practice in the Democrat party mob members ...

The same vomitus which has been regurgitated over-and-over again, since Bush became president ... and now repeated like the parrots of "progressive communism" literally must do in their arm saluting, marching in unison efforts to attack and revile, rather than reason and lead wisely ...

"Since it (Iraq War) has been won for years...."

One of my favorite topics. Bush never defined "won" that I'm aware of.

I've asked more than one Republican what was "won" in Iraq. Truthfully, no responses to date. Personally, I think Iraq is "won" the instant we have gone from the place.

"No wonder your Party is in such trouble...."

Yes, with Republican ranks swelling and all. Not to mention the result of last election....

Back to thread---Rush Limbaugh is a nasty man---D'accord?

Tad--What war has been won for years? The Iraq war? Huh? Last I heard/read, there is still a great deal of violence, still American soldiers dying, still... By what criteria was it won? Deposing Saddam? Okay. But if it had been won, would we not be gone? Would we not just have a base there, as we do in so many other places? Odd.

Obama didn't exactly condone the same programs, as far as I know, but I could have missed something. But we'll see--I continue to (note the "continue to") approach Obama with eyes wide open, not blinded by whatever some people assume all Obama voters are blinded by. We have FISA and if it's used (i.e., warrants and oversight), I don't know too many security-minded liberals (yes, we do exist) who have a problem with it. It's random spying (invasion of privacy) that we have trouble with. It's profiling (with no cause) that we have trouble with. Reasonable people can disagree reasonably on those things.

The intent of the PATRIOT Act (rushed through, as the stimulus was, by a Congress that didn't take the time to read it) was well-intentioned but largely politically motivated, as in, We must be seen to be doing something to protect our people. I believe there are some good elements in it, but also some BS (pulling library records? huh? again, how about a warrant?). Why not we who talk about these things take an honest look before discussing? How about legislators take an honest look at intent and effect before renewing or removing? I have bad feelings that none of those things are happening to any great degree. (Honesty: I haven't read all of the PATRIOT Act. Tangent: I feel much the same about NCLB, the "education" act that Bush, or maybe it's only his supporters, celebrates as an achievement.)

Deth asserts, "No, Rush is a racist fer making a large number of racist remarks over the years. Plenty of evidence there."

More BS! You leftist liars literally cannot do anything else but make the claim! You can never provide the links which support your claims; except that they are always taken out-of-context for your feeble and collective understanding(s.)

Come on back and prove me wrong, Mr. Canadian Democrat ...

"Noticing that Bush was demeaning and ruining the country for 8 years is not quite the same thing as demeaning Bush."

I love misdirections like this specious one! This is truly a conscious practice of dialectics and proves that Canadian leftists are much smarter than the Yellow-dogs on this site - one of the Big Regurgitators of vomitus in support of Democrats, then, what?

"Mad Tad is dead serious and quite, quite insane. The ideologue's ideologue."

I'm an ideologue for and about the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. I'm not a Republican ...

My being "insane" or "sane" has no bearing on the assertions I make, but those who can't answer, always make me their subject. As much smarter you are than the homegrown ilk, here, you're still too deficient mentally to reason your claims ...

Too bad.

Tad--I don't know if you're mad, but your action today seems to indicate that you're interested in the most sensationalist arguments, not conversation (not that your detractors are innocent of such behavior).

Howzabout a response to my questions, eh? : )

Zed maunders, "I've asked more than one Republican what was "won" in Iraq. Truthfully, no responses to date. "

BS! You've been told over-and-over, but you won't accept any reasoning to the contrary of what you faithfully believe, and as you've been told to believe.

"Won," is to be the winner in a contest. The US has "won" at removing Saddam. The US has "won" at ending the fear that WMD would be used by Saddam, or given to terrorists. The US has "won" at establishing an interim democratic government. The US "won" when Iraq held successful open elections. The US "won" when women's right to vote was recognized. The US "won" by continuing to defend the new democracy against terrorism, designed to end our victories in Iraq.

"Personally, I think Iraq is "won" the instant we have gone from the place."

What a bunch of idiots!

The US is still in Germany!!!

The US is still in Japan!!!

The US is still in Korea!!!

The US is still in Bosnia/Serbia!!!

The US is still in Afganistan!!!

But, the liars of the left can only recongize IRAQ and their 6 year effort to LOSE that war for votes ...

... what disgusting verminous liars they just happen to be!

"You've been told over and over...."

No, I haven't. But tell me now.

I glossed over your list of "winning" achievements for lack of evidence any of them is worth what we've put into the place.

My definition of winning is more conservative than yours, TAD---That makes me amused.

But if it makes you fell better at all, TAD---The "resolution" we're experiencing to the Iraq War is just as ambiguous and depressing as any colonial war fought by the French and Brits in Africa or in Asia for more than 150 years.

It's not okay with me that we're still in any of those countries.

Why did we need to remove Saddam at the time we did? What fear that WMD would be used by Saddam? The fear manufactured, heightened by that administration? (He had no WMDs, nor even immediate capability. The Bush WH admitted as much many times.) If we establish an interim gov't at the cost of thousands of US lives and untold numbers of Iraqi lives, and it fails, what good is such establishment?

Come on, you're just giving the tired old talking points. Those of us who were against the war from the start never bought into these ideas; why would we buy into them now? Just 'cause you're repeating them? I remain unconvinced that we needed to go after Saddam at that time. I remain unconvinced that we've accomplished some great good. Undeniably, some good things have come about, but at what cost (human and financial)? Was he contained or was he not contained? And the administration manipulated us. The neocon agenda is clearly laid out in various places; if they believe in it so deeply, why not sell it honestly to the American people? Seriously. I would have had respect for that. I still would not have found the war a good idea, but I would have respected an honest presentation of agenda and reasons. (Not that any politician is honest, but...)

Prag asks, "... I don't know if you're mad, but your action today seems to indicate that you're interested in the most sensationalist arguments, not conversation (not that your detractors are innocent of such behavior). Howzabout a response to my questions, eh? : )"

Ah, a "sensitive" smiley to lessen the effort to prejudge any answer I might make ... typical, and callow effort to make me the subject.

"What war has been won for years?"

See? You are an unthinking parrot if you can't think of some "won" of your own ...

"Obama didn't exactly condone the same programs, as far as I know, but I could have missed something."

Again, your ilk only "hear" what your head monkey tells you to "hear." I know you won't read it, because you're a blind monkey, too, but here is a link to Obama's program emphasis.

Come on back and prove me wrong, Mr. Canadian Democrat ...

Prove that Rush is a racist?

Didn't Spud just say that the onus was on you to prove him otherwise?

* sigh *

KK, Once more with feeling just fer addle-pated Taddles.

Remember, we're talking about the guy who replayed that "Barack the Magic Negro" tune over and over and over again while referring to BHO as a "man-child" because he kneew he couldn't get away with calling him "boy".

Anyway here ya go.

Rush's Greatest Racist Hits.

I mean, let's face it, we didn't have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I'm not saying we should bring it back; I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.

Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?

Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies

Take that bone out of your nose and call me back(to an African American female caller)

The media, the sports media, has got social concerns that they are first and foremost interested in, and they're dumping on this guy Rex Grossman for one reason, folks, and that's because he is a white quarterback ...They, they just want this guy not to do well 'cause he's a white quarterback ...

Sorry to say this, I don't think he's been that good from the get-go. I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.

"They're 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?"

~Rush Limbaugh

Yer turn Taddles.

Got any quotes from El Limpo indicating he isn't a racist or that at the very least he's not a race baiting divisive sack of shit who wants his POTUS and thus his country to FAIL?

Spud'll wait.

/Not holding me breath or anything but still but awaiting yer response.

Be Well.

Zed makes 3 posts for 1, "I glossed over your list of "winning" achievements for lack of evidence any of them is worth what we've put into the place."

That's the thing, Zed, your ilk only thinks it worthwhile to go to war when a Democrat is doing it. We went to war in Bosnia/Serbia to end genocide, but that wasn't "winning" in your "book" was it, Zed?

"My definition of winning is more conservative than yours, TAD---That makes me amused."

It makes you someone who is amused by their own effort to avoid a "definition," they refuse to recognize when presented to them by others!

You only fool yourself (and the ilk) with this sort of idiocy, Zed.

"... The "resolution" we're experiencing to the Iraq War is just as ambiguous and depressing as any colonial war fought by the French and Brits in Africa or in Asia for more than 150 years."

All those wars are over, Zed, but Korea still boils on, as well as our presence in Japan, Germany, Philippines, Korea, Bosnia/Serbia, Afghanistan and Iraq.

Remind me, which ones were started by a Republican?

No, you are just another of the Yellow-Dog-Democrat liars who literally cannot see, hear, or speak without it being given you by the party, or another of your leftist collective ...

Prag goes on, "Why did we need to remove Saddam at the time we did?"

You're too dense, and can't quit with the specious nonsense.

Why did we need to enter Korea, Bosnia, Vietnam, or any other war at the time we did?

"What fear that WMD would be used by Saddam? The fear manufactured, heightened by that administration?"

It doesn't matter, and since any "fear" of WMD being used in any way by Saddam has been "won" by our victories in Iraq.

"(He had no WMDs, nor even immediate capability."

They've found enough to kill several city's worth of population if used! That's the trouble with you liars, you're stuck with your lies, forever! The World's fear, at the time, was that Saddam had them ... so suck it up!

The rest is just more of your repetitious lies and misdirections, go fool a fellow leftist liar ...

Limbaugh was wrong---if a republican President had ordered the shooting of a Pirate who was holding Americanshostage, there would have been no backlash at all, an in fact the press would still be praising him for his bold, decisive and courageous action forweeks instead of glossing over it like they did with Obama.

Only republicans would bring the race of a pirate to the table.

Oh, Tadowe, I tried to write a nice response, and you call me blind etc. So fuck off. I asked honest questions. If you'd only given me the link (which btw, just took me to another DR page, not to anything new), without the insulting rhetoric, then I could respect you. But all you've done is shown me that you assume that anyone who doesn't think as you do is a parrot, is stupid, whatever. And to assume on top of that that I dehumanize anyone is fucking offensive. It must make you feel good to know everything and be able to read minds. (Oh, for the record, if anyone thinks this is me mad, you have no idea...)

But why do I bother? You'll just insult me again.

But hey, if you want to put up a link that works (direct to the source, please, not to a DR page that links to the source)--since I did honestly ask questions and accept from the start that I could have missed something--I'll be happy to read it.

Have a great afternoon. I'm out.

They've found enough to kill several city's worth of population if used! That's the trouble with you liars, you're stuck with your lies, forever! The World's fear, at the time, was that Saddam had them ... so suck it up!

The rest is just more of your repetitious lies and misdirections, go fool a fellow leftist liar ...

#53 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-04-26 03:04 PM | Reply | Flag

LINK, Liar.

Why did we need to enter Korea, Bosnia, Vietnam, or any other war at the time we did?

Well Bosnia was to prevent the ethnic cleansing that was going on.

America's unprovoked attacks on Korea and Vietnam were totally uneccessary and prolly illegal.

Be Well.

Why did we need to enter Korea, Bosnia, Vietnam, or any other war at the time we did?

--For ideological reasons, in the case of the first and last, that I don't agree with.

"What fear that WMD would be used by Saddam? The fear manufactured, heightened by that administration?"

It doesn't matter, and since any "fear" of WMD being used in any way by Saddam has been "won" by our victories in Iraq.

--What? Oh, that's logical.

"(He had no WMDs, nor even immediate capability."

They've found enough to kill several city's worth of population if used!

--Proof, please. Why did the Bush WH keep changing their language relating to this? I've read nothing official that showed proof of actual WMD or programs, only scientists that knew how and could, maybe, eventually figure it out. Why is your evidence evidence and my assertions lies? Very odd.

-- But I was leaving. Never mind.

Deth comes back up like salmonella, "Prove that Rush is a racist? Didn't Spud just say that the onus was on you to prove him otherwise? * sigh * ... Anyway here ya go."

(See above for comments)

I love "quotes" without the source for the "quotes!" That's what you liars of the Left do, routinely, make up "quotes" or take them so far out of context, you lose any meaning except what you care to impart as a lie.

No one can talk about a blackman, without someone calling them a "Racist." That's what you liars inevitably do, take such comments out of context to lie about them.

You take sarcasm as the literal truth, when it suits you, but use sarcasm to demean and revile, on your own part! You can lie and act out as a "racist," but no one else of another political persuasion is allowed to do so.

"Got any quotes from El Limpo indicating he isn't a racist or that at the very least he's not a race baiting divisive sack of shit who wants his POTUS and thus his country to FAIL?"

Reverend Jeremiah Wright can race bait, but no "whitey offay" can do so! What a pack of "racist" supporters is the Democrat party, anyway!?!

Get some support for your own claims, not a copy and paste of some leftwing "race baiting" site as you did ....

blah hate blah hate blah hate

#59 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-04-26 03:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

They've found enough to kill several city's worth of population if used! That's the trouble with you liars, you're stuck with your lies, forever! The World's fear, at the time, was that Saddam had them ... so suck it up!

The rest is just more of your repetitious lies and misdirections, go fool a fellow leftist liar ...

#53 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-04-26 03:04 PM | Reply | Flag

LINK, Liar.

Prag tries to reason, "... For ideological reasons, in the case of the first and last, that I don't agree with."

So, you agree to going to war in Bosnia? Why?

I said, "It doesn't matter, and since any "fear" of WMD being used in any way by Saddam has been "won" by our victories in Iraq."

Prag again misdirects, "What? Oh, that's logical."

It is logical, and because it wasn't any after the fact matter that WMD was NOT a reason to end Saddam's reign of terror. The whole world, including all the Democrats, thought that Saddam DID have WMD ... as mentioned, you leftist liars should drop that one ... it is making you all look like prevaicators ...

I stated, "They've found enough to kill several city's worth of population if used!"

Prag wants, "Proof, please."

I love "quotes" without the source for the "quotes!" That's what you liars of the Left do, routinely, make up "quotes" or take them so far out of context, you lose any meaning except what you care to impart as a lie.

So now Spud has to provide sourcing for his quotes?

KK, most of that came from wikiquote the sources are in there if you care to read them.

No WMDs were found in Iraq that were manufdactured in Iraq. Any WMDs found later could have easily been imported to fight the American invasion.

Iraq had no WMDs that werten't sold to them. Iraq was no threat. There would have been no approval iv gas were te only WMD Saddam was suspected of harboring.

You lose.

Go back to hating America.

Go back to hating America.

Says the guy who quotes Lincoln and wants to divide her. LOL

Bob bloviates, "No WMDs were found in Iraq that were manufdactured in Iraq. Any WMDs found later could have easily been imported to fight the American invasion."

See, Pragmatist? No amount of proof will *ever* force a leftist, yellow-dog-democrat to abandon their faith in their own lies.

Canadian Club Spud can't find the actual quotes, so resorts to wikipedia.

Unreal, Spud! Of course, you realize that all those "quotes" couldn't actually be forthright - that some (if not all) are taken out of context to lie about what was said!

You are pretty desperate, aren't you, when it comes to me, what?

Always trying the misdirection for the ilk to close their collective mouths, ears and eyes ...

... good work for a Canadian, if they can get it! Third person pontificating poltroons of politics need any edge they can get ...

...that prove that Rush is not ...

It is logically impossible to prove a negative, bOoB -- er, deth.

It is logically impossible to prove a negative, bOoB -- er, deth.

Well it's certainly impossible to prove that Rush aint a racist that's a given.

How about using...

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.

...to prove that MLK wasn't a racist?

Does that scan with you?

Be Well.

Deth says, "Well it's certainly impossible to prove that Rush aint a racist that's a given."

Deth hasn't shown that he isn't a racist, either.

He obviously has some racist intent in calling me, "KK," among other insults he has levied against me, due to my skin color.

A google search will display loads of attacks he has made against me because of my race.

Dethspud is a blatant racist and bigot!

Well it's certainly impossible to prove that Rush aint a racist that's a given.

You are correct -- just as it is impossible to prove that you aren't one.

...to prove that MLK wasn't a racist?

That is not proof that he was not a racist. Before you invariably twist my words, I'll get the jump on you: I do not believe MLK was a racist.

Does that scan with you?

Vis-a-vis the branch of mathematics known as logic and the universally accepted rules associated with it? No, not at all.

If you can prove to me that you are not a racist, I'll take it all back and concede the point to you.

Canadian Club Spud can't find the actual quotes, so resorts to wikipedia.

You asked fer sources.

Wikiquotes provides those sources.

Unless yer now alleging that wikiquote is a leftwing "race baiting" site.

Be Well.

He obviously has some racist intent in calling me, "KK," among other insults he has levied against me, due to my skin color.

That's almost as funny as the time you thought Spud was a racist fer calling you the "Black Ka'Nig'it" in reference to the famous Monty Python and the Holy Grail sketch.

In truth Spud doesn't know or care wot race you are, Taddles.

Spud presumes some variant inherent within the subsets of the human race but even that notion is not entirely certain.

Occasionally Spud imagines that you are an insane Martian or Venusean who bumped his head severely when yer UFO crash landed on earth some years ago.

/Course that's just a theory at present.

Be Well.

That's almost as funny as the time....

Actually, he's right, tad. The 'K' thing is just the latest affectation he has dragged over from another blog to further fortify his plastic self-constructed cutesy image. It's not a racist thing.

Deth, the quotes in wikipedia aren't "racist!"

Otherwise, anyone telling a "Your Momma" joke is a blatant racist!

You want Limbaugh to be discredited, so that your American gang of leftists can continue on down the road to utopian communism, unhindered by any expression of free speech by the opposition ...

That's why I dote on threads like this one ... the Leftish effort to silence speech by lying about it and reviling its use, other than their own ...

If you can prove to me that you are not a racist, I'll take it all back and concede the point to you.

Evidence of racism is found in deed and in speech.

If you can find a quote from Spud that indicates that he is racist feel free to post it.

If you can't you hafta assume that either Spud isn't a racist or that if he is he keeps it well hidden.

The fact that Spud has been advocating for Obama as POTUS since before the nomination process began might be a bit of a clue as to which statement is more correct but then again it could just be Spud cleverly hiding his racist roots.

Spud retorts. You decide.

Be Well.

You want Limbaugh to be discredited, so that your American gang of leftists can continue on down the road to utopian communism, unhindered by any expression of free speech by the opposition ...

Lie one. Rush is alredy discredited. The only accredation he gets is from anti-American, racist, low-info, mouth-breathing rtards.

Lie two. Lefties do not favor America becoming an authoritarian communist state that's merely shrill propaganda from the intellectually dishonest, morally bankrupt right.

Lie Three. Leties are far bigger proponents of Free Speech that Rtards.

Three strikes, yer out.

New batter please.

Be Well.

Deth resorts to excuses, "The fact that Spud has been advocating for Obama as POTUS since before the nomination process began might be a bit of a clue as to which statement is more correct but then again it could just be Spud cleverly hiding his racist roots."

Spud ignores Obama's racist preacher in his support for Obama, and that by that association and weekly assembly, that Obama proves himself to be a similar racist.

So much for Deth's excuses that he isn't a racist, then!

Limbaugh must be doing the same, by awarding his highest paid employment position to a blackman. Right, Mr. Canadian Racist Supporting Leftist?

"Spud retorts. You decide."

Spud is rotten to his Democrat center ...

"his plastic self-constructed cutesy image. " Right on.

Actually a 60s draft-dodger, in hiding, drooling and giggling insanely as he hovers 24/7 at his keyboard.

If you can find a quote from Spud that indicates that he is racist feel free to post it.

I'm not claiming you are a racist. I said prove that you are not one. Your lack of utterance of a racial slur on this blog certainly is not proof of that if that is what you are implying.

Your knowledge of the mathematics of logic are sorely lacking and as bad as bOoB's.

GreatAmerican announces, "Actually a 60s draft-dodger, in hiding, drooling and giggling insanely as he hovers 24/7 at his keyboard."

Which war did you bravely fight in to protect democracy, freedom and liberty?

I suppose there weren't any leftwing draft dodgers, were there? Say, president Clinton, for example?

How about Gephardt? Wasn't he a draft dodger? How about a count the cowards contest? Want to bet which side had more lily-livered retreat to Canada, or other forms of draft dodging?

Actually a 60s draft-dodger, in hiding

Spud is Dick Cheney? This place is full of surprises.

We didn't invade Iraq over the pissy little stash found. If that were cause for invasion, we should have invaded Russia in 1960, and North Korea now. Tadowe continues to defend the useless war that has contributed greatly to the current economic situation, and to defend the useless loss of American lives. I expect nothing less than blind obedience to his Messiah till Taddy dies and goes to the Western Whitehouse in the afterlife, surrounded by 72 vrgins to do with as he pleases---except these virgins are cows.

...assume that either Spud isn't a racist or that if he is he keeps it well hidden.

Well you do conceal yourself behind a very meticulously constructed fantasy on this blog. You are clearly hiding something.

Or do you act like this and speak in third person in real life?

Which war did you bravely fight in to protect democracy, freedom and liberty?

US Army, Vietnam era, chickenshit lib....

Spud is Dick Cheney? This place is full of surprises.

There's someone out there who thinks there was only one draft dodger ever?

The world is ineed full of surprises! I never would have guess anyone could be so naive.

Clinton was no draft dodger. He was a Rhodes Scholar. Bush was a draft dodger---he hadhis daddy pull strings to get him out of the draft and into a nice cushy ANG unit---that he skipped out on.

US Army, Vietnam era, chickenshit lib....

#84 | Posted by Greatamerican at 2009-04-26 04:40 PM | Reply | Flag

But no Vietnam ribbon--no volunteer for Nam like Gore--like Kerry? wussy.

Reinheitsgebot gets pure and orderly, "Spud is Dick Cheney? This place is full of surprises."

So, the count begins: My Gephardt for Limbaugh and now Chenney for my Biden, who received student deferements equal to Chenney's ...

You're up ...

Volunteer, commissioned. And you, Buffalo Chip?

Bob reviles service, "But no Vietnam ribbon--no volunteer for Nam like Gore--like Kerry? wussy."

What a disgusting geek you are, Bob! You demean this man's service for NOT going to Vietnam???

You are a prime example of Leftist hatred and willingness to vilify and dehumanize!

I'm sure right about you as a leftist, if not anyone else!

Actually a 60s draft-dodger, in hiding

Cheney is the one renowned for hiding in his bunker.

For you Tadowe.

Representative Patrick McHenry, R-NC - did not serve. Saw fit to endanger American troops' lives after a visit to Iraq by violating operational security and helping militias target their mortar attacks on the Green Zone.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY - did not serve (1)
Senate Assistant Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-MI - avoided the draft, did not serve.
Senate Republican Conference Chairman Jon Kyl, R-AZ - did not serve.
Senate Republican Conference Vice Chair John Cornyn, R-TX - did not serve.
National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair John Ensign, R-NV - did not serve.

House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-OH - did not serve.
House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-MO - did not serve.
House Republican Conerence Chair Adam Putnam, R-FL - did not serve.
House Republican Policy Committee Thaddeus McCotter, R-MI - did not serve.
National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Tom Cole, R-OK - did not serve.

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani - did not serve.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney - did not serve in the military but did serve the Mormon Church on a 30-month mission to France.
Former Senator Fred Thompson - did not serve.
Senator John McCain - McCain's naval honors include the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. Why did the Bush campaign smear him so in 2000? At least Senators Cleland (D-GA), Kerry (D-MA), Kerrey (D-NE), Robb (D-VA) and Hagel (R-NE) defended him.

Click on the logo above to join America's oldest and most respected environmental organization, and stop Bush's all-out assault on our environment.
Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert - avoided the draft, did not serve.
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey - avoided the draft, did not serve.
Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay - avoided the draft, did not serve (1). "So many minority youths had volunteered ... that there was literally no room for patriotic folks like himself."
Former House Majority Whip Roy Blunt - did not serve
Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist - did not serve. (An impressive medical resume, but not such a friend to cats in Boston.)
Rick Santorum, R-PA, formerly third ranking Republican in the Senate - did not serve. (1)
George Felix Allen, former Republican Senator from Virginia - a supporter of Nixon and the Vietnam war, did not serve.

Great sputters, "US Army, Vietnam era, chicenshitlib ...."

Don't be so hard on yourself, at least you were in the Army (thanks for your service) and not a complete "chickenshitlib."

The best thing about Rush Limbaugh is...5 minutes after he's dead, no one will give a flying fuck that he ever lived because he is....

A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT !!

A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT !!

...that the left can't stop talking about. LOL

Spud ignores Obama's racist preacher in his support for Obama, and that by that association and weekly assembly, that Obama proves himself to be a similar racist.

Spud doesn't ignore Rverend Wright.

Spud defends Reverend Wright against the rtard assertion that he is an unabashed racist.

Cos he isn't.

Thanks Pure, we wouldn't know the Republicans who avoided the draft without you!

That was so easy for you! I'll bet you could post the list of Democrats, too, right?

Never mind, though, because it is perfectly "OKAY" for Democrats to avoid service, because when Nixon became president, it was just fine and dandy to draft dodge, like Clinton, to lie about the military, like Kerry, and abandon a nation we sunk into a war they couldn't win on their own ... and abandoned them like Democrat chickenshitlibs ...

... those who hate Limbaugh, now, and think they are great Americans for their continued, yellow-bellied, lying effort to lose in Iraq ...

... for votes ...

Now, those are real chicken shit liberals!

GFY D

#93 - The way some of you guys carry on, I think your prediction is wrong. After he's gone, you'll probably start a Rush Limbaugh Effigy business.

I'm tired of hearing about Limbaugh.

BTW: You're welcome - I'm giving you this effigy idea for free today.

Tadowe still posting mindess drivel about liberals because he blames them for his discharge. Your discharge was your own fault not the libs.

Spud is Dick Cheney? This place is full of surprises.

Oh noez! They is on to Spud!

Curses foiled again!

Wot gave it away?

Was it the man-sized safe?

Dangit Spud knew he shoulda gotten rid of that thing!

Be Well.

Tads 'discharge" problem was the fault of a hooker.

Tad can't let a war go that was 40 years ago.

BTW Pure, I meant the Vietnam era service and as it was mentioned in relation to Limbaugh and Chenney... but that's okay, because you really aren't that swift on the uptake, and I'll give you the benefit of your ignorance ...

Or do you act like this and speak in third person in real life?#83

I think he's Bob Dole

Alex says, "Tads 'discharge" problem was the fault of a hooker.

#101 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-04-26 05:02 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Will wonders never cease?!? This is the first ever such effort, Alex!

I'm delighted with you!

Rasta misdirects, "Your discharge was your own fault not the libs."

I never said that it was anyone's fault, since it was a RIF, and I was a Reserve Officer.

However, thanks for making me your subject again, Rasta. You are definitely obsessed.

A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT !! ...that the left can't stop talking about. LOL #94 | Posted by goatman

Of course the left can't stop talking about Rush, you silly boytard. It's called a political strategy, as identifying Rush as the Dictator of the GOP is paying big political dividends. And it's been a brilliant success, with Rush taking the bait every time he garners a humiliating, public apology from your sad, shit-for-brains pols? In fact, it's the gift that keeps on giving. Get it now?

Just the other day you were complaining how libs screwed you after 14 yrs of service.

Alex says, "Tads 'discharge" problem was the fault of a hooker.

Interesting theory. It goes a long way towards esplaining why Tad is so grumpy alla time.

If it hurt everytime Spud went fer a pee then no doubt Spud would be a lot more surly around here too.

Be Well.

I go with Ooey, for once. Ruth does make me think. Let me revel in that for a bit. Think about what??? It carries fairly severe penalties, but would surely improve the airwaves. herm

dear rush...

Get it now?

Yes. Lies and propoganda are tools of the left you are saying. Thanks, but I already knew that.

Oorah notices, "I wish there were more like him, actually. On both sides of the aisle."

Mort Saul used to take on rightwing politicians to good effect, but so sorry for him, he made jokes about leftwing politicians, too.

He made jokes about Kennedy and got blacklisted, as the Democrats will always do to anyone who disagrees with their lies and greed for power.

Now, you have zealous idiots like Garofalo who are nothing more than ranting and rooting pigs ...

Deth must 3d persons someone else's joke, "Interesting theory. It goes a long way towards esplaining why Tad is so grumpy alla time."

What an arrogant twit you are to ride someone else's humorous effort. What a true pig you make of yourself!

I'm not claiming you are a racist. I said prove that you are not one. Your lack of utterance of a racial slur on this blog certainly is not proof of that if that is what you are implying.

Your knowledge of the mathematics of logic are sorely lacking

Again. Speech supporting racist thought is proof of racism. Speech opposing racism is proof that one is not a racist.

Exchange "not a racist" with "one who opposes racism" and you'll see that it is not, as you say, "proving a negative" it's merely proving a positive.

Spud find yer lack of knowledge of the dichotomy of the english language and the limits of certain logical truisms to be kinda funny albeit a little frustrating to be perfectly honest about it.

Still, yer not a bad guy at the end of the day.

Anybody who's a fan of science fiction, star gazing, Willie Nelson and athiesm can't be all bad in Spud's Big Book of People Who Don't Suck*.

/*Now in it's 25th anniversary edition

Be Well.

Rasta can't stop, "Just the other day you were complaining how libs screwed you after 14 yrs of service."

I mentioned being blacklisted in the Army for my effort to stop a PUBLIC display of torture by the South - not the Democrats, and although Johnson was president.

I wasn't layed-off until 1973, when Nixon was president.

However, I understand your neurotic obsession with me, and your heuristic ability to only hear or read what you want to in your desire to defame me, personally ...

Otherwise, and except for your flattering attentions to me, you are an ignorant fool.

What a true pig you make of yourself!

Hey now! Just cos Spud enjoys a truffle from time to time...

Be Well.

I think he's Bob Dole

Nope.

113|Posted by goatman

No, because you wouldn't have made your ignorant previous comment if I didn't educate you. Plus, as most run-of-the-mill political automotons, you are fast and loose dishing out the "lies & propaganda" stigma.

So when a radio talking head extracts, serially, aplogies from GOP pols for calling him out for what he is, and the Dems take the obvious chance to expose the GOP as a pathetic has-beens. Is that really lies and propaganda?

Actually, it's more like just the GOP is on death row, and the Dems are giving them a shoelace. If you want to call that lies & propaganda, that's your head trip.

Speech opposing racism is proof that one is not a racist.

unless you are mis-representing yourself. You have proven you do that (or do you really speak in third person, say things like "luff, prolly, sommit" and identify yourself as a potato in real life?)

So how can you expect the world to believe you when you say you are not a racist when clearly you have proven yourself to be a plastic person who daily misrepresents himself?

No, because you wouldn't have made your ignorant previous comment if I didn't educate you.

Oh thank you massuh, for educating me.

*snark*

I'm not one of your inferiors whom you democrats look at everyone else as.

If you want to call that lies & propaganda, that's your head trip.

Actually, it is your democratic leaders' headtrips. They openly admitted the Rush thing was a campaign. We had a thread and story about it a few weeks ago. I guess you missed it.

It hurts to know you support a party who resorts to lies and propoganda (and admits it) to make political gain, doesn't it?

Well, that's your head trip. LOL

Most people are too stupid to realize things are better under Dems. Who was better Clinton or Bush. I say things were better under Clinton.

I say things were better under Clinton.

I would never have guessed you would say that, ratsa.

Most people are too stupid to realize things are better under Dems. Who was better Clinton or Bush. I say things were better under Clinton.
#124 | Posted by rastaninja

Don't worry about the money. You spend it. We'll make more.

-Obama

They were BLACK, hello!!!!

I am black and I am NOT offended. These AFRICANS were indeed black and reports were that they were teenagers. Statement of fact here. If this was offensive, you would have heard Jessie Jackson ar Al Sharpton or the NAACP causing stir and they didn't. Unfuckingbelievable!!!!!!!!

It's scary day when liberal white are calling racism when Blacks are not!!!! Liberal Democrats are not stupid but insane to boot!

So how can you expect the world to believe you when you say you are not a racist when clearly you have proven yourself to be a plastic person who daily misrepresents himself?

Are you insinuating that Spud isn't really an 8 1/2 inch tall talking potato?!

That's crazy talk, right there!

Madness!

Be Well.

It is time to start moving into the next phase of American politics. A post-Republican phase. I say this because the rightwing of America has been so incompetent, so discredited and so thoroughly rejected by most Americans that at this point they are not even a viable opposition Party. And that is a bad thing. In order for a democracy to work there must be viable opposition which intelligently articulates the beliefs of large number of Americans. As far as I can tell the current GOP only articulates the beliefs of the likes of Tadowe, Takeitez, Johnson and other complete fringe insane wingnuts. Which is why even in Republican dominated districts the Democrats are still winning elections, as recently as last week in upstate New York.

UTASTAFF you are a discredit to your own people. You act like you are not proud of your skin color.

I say things were better under Clinton.
I would never have guessed you would say that, ratsa. #125 | Posted by goatman at

Oh no, Ratsa has violated the 8th Commandment of RushGod. Will Ratsa be excommunicated from the Church of Rtards now?

"Because (Utah Staph) is black is he supposed to necessarily have a certain political outlook? Should one necessarily be 'proud' of one's skin color? Your thoughts?"

There are surely some super-publicized black Judases to their own people: Alan Keyes, Ward Conerly, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowells - even Condi Rice. Views they expound and actions they support do their own people damned little good. Their extreme subservience to capitalism and its implied white supremacy may be unrelated. Should they be "proud" of their skin tone? Probably not. But they shouldn't be ashamed of it either. herm

tadowe...how do you know I am a sophomore? Maybe I've been posting since the beginning.

The Democrats would defame and revile as they always do, and project that hatred and bigotry onto their political opponents.

You know this, and yet foster the hatred, in your mealymouthed way ...

#17 | Posted by tadowe at 2009-04-26 12:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

Did you know John McCain fathered a black love-child?

Guess whose campaign started that lie?

HINT: There was no 'D' after the persons name.

There are surely some super-publicized black Judases to their own people: Alan Keyes, Ward Conerly, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowells - even Condi Rice.

#134 | Posted by herm

Typical Democrats who want to CONTROL the minds of blacks like Democrats sought to keep their control of blacks with slavery (thank God for Republican Abraham Lincoln) and Southern Democrats who sought to keep blacks in segregation to control their education and prospects to rise up. Today's Democrats think that if a black person is not Democrat they are a traitor to their race. That's racist. Whites can be Democrats, Independants and Republicans. Apparently white Democrats think that blacks can only be Democrats and have to think the same way. Why can't blacks have divergent points of views just like whites?

I truly believe a great number of closet racists voted for Barack Obama to make themselves feel better to try to convince themselves that they are not racist. Just look at comments from true white racist liberals like Herm. The racism speaks for itself.

I truly believe a great number of closet racists voted for Barack Obama to make themselves feel better to try to convince themselves that they are not racist...

Posted by utastaff at 2009-04-26 09:49 PM |

But you were too smart to fall for that...

Rush is a has been. The only useful thing he does is run the blood pressure up on libs who hate him so much.

As far as the hijackers are concerned I am glad that the President, in this case Obama, gave the the thumbs up to snipe these bastards.

BPH-
"Rush" has the largest audience of any radio personality in the nation.

Betel- Largely because he is given away to many stations for free. (dead serious)

Alex-
I don't intend to fluff the old toad, but he is not to be dismissed on the one hand and listened to raptly on the other, as is BPH's intent.

The size of a man's audience should not be confused with the size of his cock. His mouth maybe, and granted Rush has a big mouth, but not a big pecker. It is likely pathetic after all the drugs. People who don't understand that are not to be taken seriously.

...but not a big pecker

Who cares if he is hung like a horse or a Tic-Tac? Fuck, it's bad enough that I have to be subjected to his inanities thanks to the left, but can we just leave comments about his dick at the door, please?

...but not a big pecker

Who cares if he is hung like a horse or a Tic-Tac? Fuck, it's bad enough that I have to be subjected to his inanities thanks to the left, but can we just leave comments about his dick at the door, please?
#144 | Posted by goatman at 2009-04-27 12:31 AM

Darling, it's a metaphor - Rush Limbaugh is a giant leech-colored fat sticky slug cock. He gets momentarily stiff at the smell of race-baiting and erupts a vile concoction of Xanax, Oxycontin and puppy blood when cornered or coated in salt. Is that any clearer?

146 threads on the Rush-thread-of-the-day. And his ratings continue to soar, especially from lefties.

Wonder what outrageous thing he'll say today, just before making another big deposit at the bank.

lol...guess we now know who this guy votes for. What Rush said was not racial. He was correct, can you imagine what liberals would have said if Bush had given the orders to shoot.

The comment Rush made is comparable to the story on todays post about McCain. McCain comments about the 9/11 terrorists and the left on here goes nuts. However; when the Obama admin made the same comments the left jumped to the defense. Hell, this site didn't even bother to post a story about it, people had to mention it in other posts. Danni even wrote a comment about how Jan was just thinking about a different terrorist.

The hate on the left is just amazing on this site.

That's right Cookfish the president should fly coach and wait in line like everyone else.

Or, as the article suggests, he could have TELECONFERENCED.

Something Algore should invest in as an alternative to his private jet and gas guzzling automobiles while trumpeting the need to cut back on fossil fuel consumption.

When does Mr. Murphy issue his apology to Rush?

Mike--You're funny; guess what, nearly every poster on this list sees every comment made in the public eye through his or her lens and only through that lens. Well, okay, maybe not nearly every, but lots. Your comment is almost like my bothering to note that people need to actually discuss here. It ain't gonna happen. Or rarely.

Then, the political cowards, for miserly greed and personal power, left our friend to die, while we had the means to save them ...

Yeah, Nixon and Ford were pretty pathetic, Taddy. Then again, Republican Presidents in a war setting usually are. Lincoln was the exception, but even he had trouble with a bunch of inbred southerners. Not as bad as Bush getting his ass kicked by guys on donkeys and camels....

Rush" has the largest audience of any radio personality in the nation.

Considering that the only ones listening to talk radio anymore is the old farts convention, I'm not surprised.

"Considering that the only ones listening to talk radio anymore is the old farts convention, I'm not surprised."

No shit. Who in the fuck in their right mind listens to broadcast talk radio? What is there, about 20 minutes of content to 40 minutes of advertising?

"The other half of America thinks he is the worst thing ... since ... Andrew Jackson."

I know it, they are exactly the ones who would have joined those abolitionist organizations.
You are so smart, you should replace Rush on the radio.

It's clear that what you need is a Rinnai tankless water heater, Nullifidian.

I think it's funny when people call Rush Limbaugh a retard or a moron. I find his shtick repulsive, but he's far from stupid. He knows _exactly_ what he's doing, and he's likely a talk-radio artist. But to say that out loud doesn't mean I think he or his presence is a good thing. Just as I can respect Al Qaeda's cleverness but not their outcomes. (And no, I'm not equating Rush with bin Laden. Though I should have let it stand to encourage people to scream at me and call me nasty names.)

Rescued Sailor Accuses Limbaugh of 'Hate Speech'

Not to nitpick but this man was not rescued,if memory serves they took the vessel back from the pirates thus saving themseleves. The only one rescued was the Captian

And people keep referring to liberals. Are this guy's political affiliations known?

How is Limbaugh a racist for describing black teenagers as "black teenagers"? The Jonas Brothers is a band of "white teenagers", is that racist to say?

Love this quote from White Vice President Joe Biden about Barack Obama during the presidential campaign:

Could this be any more racist?

Could you be any more stupid?

Spud's guess is no.

Be Well.

UTA-
Limbaugh is not a racist simply because he is a race monger.

One of the most comical riffs I've seen from Limbaugh recently is his use of the word "demagogue" to describe Obama while he rants about Obama's "execution" of "black teenagers".

(Perhaps "Rush" and his assorted idiotic ditto-heads would benefit from looking up 'demagogue' in a borrowed dictionary)

Rush is not a racist. If he was, a black man such as myself would not be listening to him every morning.

Obama okay'd 3 black teenagers to be shot with 50 caliber sniper rifles. A round like that must have literally caused their heads to explode off their shoulders. That's fine but referring to them as black teenagers is bad.

What the hell is wrong with the liberal mind? Everything!

Obama okay'd 3 black teenagers to be shot with 50 caliber sniper rifles. A round like that must have literally caused their heads to explode off their shoulders. That's fine but referring to them as black teenagers is bad.

So... all of the sudden you/rush are pacifists? Or just when it's convenient? They were holding an American hostage, negotiations had broken down, and they all stuck their melons outside the boat at the same time - who cares what color the melon is? They were pirates. The reason why these people resort to piracy is truly sad, but any American president would have given the order, regardless of their party affiliation or racial issues. This was a combat operation, not an execution. Get fucking real (and get off the Rush - it's like crack but worse for your brain).

Rush is not a racist. If he was, a black man such as myself would not be listening to him every morning.

You're right, Rush prefers to have his butt boil lanced by the finest ebony schlongs that the Dominican Republic has to offer.

Rush and the swine who follow him make mountains out of molehills when it is politically advantageous. He knows what buttons to push and when to push them - but realize he's just stirring the pot because that's what makes him rich. He's a self-serving bastard who makes millions by acting as a conservative demagogue.

I never said "Rush" was a racist, UTA. I said he was a race monger trafficking in the bigotry that exists in his audience. He does it all the time, whether it be against black quarterbacks or black presidents. His common theme is that blacks in positions of respect, accomplishment, or power are puppets controlled by others.

Actually the rifles were .308 caliber H&K's.

Actually the rifles were .308 caliber H&K's.

I don't think the pirates noticed a difference.

Zat-
What? UTA didn't have accurate information prior to forming his opinions?

No!

"Rush is not a racist. If he was, a black man such as myself would not be listening to him every morning."

The word "masochism" does spring to mind.
Also "love hearing that whitey sound stupid".

"A round like that must have literally caused their heads to explode off their shoulders."

Cool!

It would have been much more appropriate to shoot them in the head with a round that would cause less tissue damage.

Utastiff

So... all of the sudden you/rush are pacifists? Or just when it's convenient?

#164 | Posted by ZombieHunter

I am not pacificist. I think those pirates got what they deserved. My point was that when Rush Limbaugh simply states with words that black Somoli pirate teenagers are indeed "black teenagers" that makes him a racist in the minds of liberals for merely stating a fact using race in a description and therefore Rush is a bad guy but Barack Obama can give the order to actually KILL those same black teenagers by having their heads blown off by Navy Seals and that makes Obama a good guy.

The liberal mind works in mysterious ways.

I am not pacificist. I think those pirates got what they deserved. My point was that when Rush Limbaugh simply states with words that black Somoli pirate teenagers are indeed "black teenagers" that makes him a racist in the minds of liberals for merely stating a fact using race in a description and therefore Rush is a bad guy...

I don't know what other people are saying, but for me it's not the fact that he used race in the description of the pirates - it's his intent in making this into some sort of a political issue. This was a no-brainer decision for any president, and Rush tosses liberals a softball and tries to get them inflamed. That's his main tactic - say things that are going to get your ideological rivals pissed off so you don't have to go to the pain of debating issues with them. Rush Limbaugh doesn't want to debate - he wants to berate. If he actually had to present a rational argument, he would be eaten alive by anyone with a functioning brain.

Rush is a "bad guy" because he thrives by stirring the pot, as I've said, and trying to polarize non-contentious issues. Whatever he can politicize and mold into a controversy, he will. He is rich because he spews a bunch of nonsense and inflammatory rhetoric. People like that are weasels - I don't care what side of the aisle they are on. Olbermann, that other nut from MSNBC, Coulter, Limbaugh, O'Reiley... all of them are scum. They do the same general thing. None of them contribute to any substantive discussion of issues that confront this nation. It's just a nasty argument or bitching session.

Diehard republicans love Rush because they are just as insane as he is, and diehard liberals bitch about him because they can't beat him at his own game. Moderates find him distasteful because he is a radical. Regardless, people have an opinion about him and Rush basks in the limelight - no publicity is bad publicity in the media.

...but Barack Obama can give the order to actually KILL those same black teenagers by having their heads blown off by Navy Seals and that makes Obama a good guy.

Apples and oranges here. Rush is trying to precipitate a political argument about race, and Obama just did what any president would do.

Actually the rifles were .308 caliber H&K's.

#168 | Posted by Zatoichi

And that's why I shoot a .308.

Utah Staph makes a point worth considering. Just because an African Americas joins the Ku Klux Klan (auxiliary, obviously), the Association Pursuing a Return to Slavery (APARTS) or the Republican Party, why SHOULD that make him/her a traitor to his/her people? herm

Rush is not racist.

As for Obama-- I am glad he gave the order to shoot to kill the friggin somalis want a cracker pirates.

Rush is not a racist. If he was, a black man such as myself would not be listening to him every morning.

Why would anyone think just because you are black that you are not a racist too? I am white and when I was a kid my peers joked about pollacks, spics, beaners, krouts, and just to name a few. Were we racist? No, because I didn't hate them. I had a friend in Germany who was from Congo that was blacker then the ace of spades and he hated American blacks. Was he a racist? Yes, because he hated them.

Racism is all about politics and ideology not skin color. In that respect Rush is a major racist.

I had a friend in Germany who was from Congo that was blacker then the ace of spades and he hated American blacks.

I was in Mombasa Kenya in the '70s. The American black guys from my ship were dressed in their disco finest strutting like peacocks in the bars. The girls there flocked around the white guys but ignored the black guys. I asked one of them why. She (a black girl) said, "Because they are niggers".

Shocking answer, but true story.