Deth says, "The Bio-mass continues to be de-nuded at an increasing pace."
This is an untrue inference. If you are saying that "forests" are being decreased, then you already know that husbandry has already provided more "forest" than the USA had prior to Western incursion. If you are saying that it is the lack of old growth "forest," then you also know that more biomass results when the shade of these mature "forests" is removed. In fact, those who use the term "pollution" as an epithet, are whining over increases in algae, and which may be impacting CO2 exhaling animal species; e.g., frogs, and fish populations.
So, your claim isn't supported by facts, just spouted as an hysterical (chicken-little) complaint, and at best, specious.
"The warming oceans are achieving a tipping point beyond which they themselves will begin contributing to the CO2 emission."
Increased ocean temperatures would release increased CO2 by sublimation, but it would also increase the algae growth, proportionally. The cycle is closed and continues to keep the various levels of our atmospheric gases at a constant.
However, increases in CO2 don't necessarily lead to increases in GW, since there are many geological periods, where the facts show that it was colder, but at a much higher level of CO2 than now. And also, vice versa, there were times when CO2 levels were lower, but where the temperature was much higher. Although a closed cycle, it is obvious that CO2, by itself, is not what causes GW.
"So to put that in short and sweet form, our emissions continually rise while the planets ability to deal with them continually decrease."
When Mt Pinatubo went ballistic, the world's level of CO2 was dramatically increased, and continued to receive CO2 out gassing at a continuous rate. After a year, studies indicated that worldwide CO2 levels had initially risen, but had fallen back to "normal" levels, after a year. Guess what? During that same measurement period, our CO2 emissions remained the same, or increased some, if you will, but the Earth's "norm" was repaired by the Water Cycle, and other processes, at the same time!
"Meanwhile, assclowns like Mad Tad the Addlepated go on and on about the sun's contributions and how miniscule to the point of insignificance is mankinds contribution to the problem."
See? Even the vaunted intellect of the Canadian Great White North can admit that the majority of GW would HAVE to be from the Sun!
They run screaming from acknowledging that our percent of contribution to CO2 could never cause GW, in the face of the geological science they misrepresent proving otherwise!
With all the editorial freedom in the world, and the Man Made GW faithful can't change the facts, even on Wikipedia!
