Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Rupert Murdoch has apologized for the editorial cartoon depicting the author of the stimulus bill as a dangerous chimp who had to be shot. " As the Chairman of the New York Post, I am ultimately responsible for what is printed in its pages. The buck stops with me," Murdoch wrote. "Last week, we made a mistake. We ran a cartoon that offended many people. Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended, and even insulted."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Poor Rupert-his company's value is down by 70% and the right is in collapse. Time tore-evaluate his political position, right comrade murdoch?

We would not wish to belittle this research and we will study the findings with interest, but this is the first time we have ever heard of a complaint of this nature. Texas, Washington, Massachusetts and New Hampshire have also outlawed the practice. A spokeswoman for the Florida board says there's concern because there's no way to disinfect a pool of fish in between uses. That breaks the record set last year by Viviane Castro, whose covering was all of 4-centimeters (1.5 inches) long. He said he was waiting for a cat to cross over to the other side.

"Last week, we made a mistake. We ran a cartoon that offended many people. Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended, and even insulted."
Rupert Murdoch

WTF? Is he serious? It was a cartoon taken way out of context by a man who just hasn't had enough time in the spotlight lately. Rupert, you failed. You should have either kept your mouth shut and not said anything about it or come up with a nice and proper way to say "Go fuck yourself you attention grubbing pile of shit". Unbelievable.

It is going to be a pleasure to see all the reich wing white folk here going berserk over Murdoch's long over due apology.

I think you need a little Merlot with that Crow...

BBBWWWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH! Ha! Ha!!!

Prolick,
Apologizing is simply good business. It appeases the retards that thought it was a racist cartoon in the first place.

In fact, retards that thought it was racist would most likely see an apology as an admission that it was racist, when non-retards realize it's simply appeasing the dummies.

This apology is shallow and disingenuous to say the least.

Now a $100,000 donation to Al Sharpton and NAN would go a long way towards righting this terrible wrong.

Right 101,

Maybe you prefer a Burgundy.

Red whines go better with crow...

I feel like Chalton Heston did when he saw the Statue of Liberty buried in the sand.

The monkeys have takem over and now we must all bow down to Barry and the rest of the Chimps.

Future World Thom

White Wines are generally reccomended for poultry, Ponch.

Now, have somebody else explain how "eating crow" doesn't apply, seeing as though you can't seem to figure it out on your own.

The real shitter is that we won't even be able to hide in the corn fields. (Unless they repeal the Ethanol mandate).

Wow... the fraudulent charge of racism in a cartoon brought out the actual racists.

101 I would not consider crow poultry, more of a game bird. Game birds are mighty fine with red.

Should I teach you how to eat it also?

Keep whining and dining.

BBBWWWAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!

pussy

The monkeys have takem over and now we must all bow down to Barry and the rest of the Chimps.
#8 | Posted by fwthom

What a surprise you don't understand the offensiveness of the cartoon.

What a surprise you don't understand the offensiveness of the cartoon.

#14 | Posted by TFDNihilist

fwthom and his daddy, 101 kiddieporn, don't understand anything.

How could a nihilist like TooFuckingDumb be offended by anything? I thought you wackos believed that there was no meaning to life.

Seriously - would someone PLEASE explain the joke?

I mean, it is a cartoon. Cartoons by definition are supposed to be funny. What interpretation (other than the shooting of a black US president represented as a monkey) is there? I mean one that makes any logical sense or is even remotely funny?

I keep reading reports on this issue but I've never heard what the "joke" was "supposed" to have been.

Thanks.

"White Wines are generally reccomended for poultry, Ponch.

#9 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2009-02-24 03:29 PM"

What a fag. Drink beer, you queer.

Rupert is so graceful at times.

MONTE,

The last time I read one of your posts, you were predicting $200 a barrel oil. What happened???

What happened???

Bush's Great Depression. Is there anything he didn't fuck up?

"MONTE,

The last time I read one of your posts, you were predicting $200 a barrel oil. What happened???

#20 | Posted by fwthom at 2009-02-24 05:59 PM"

The fuck I was, FW. I don't make predictions, kid. You must be thinking of Vergon and his $30/barrel.

"The fuck I was, FW. I don't make predictions, kid. You must be thinking of Vergon and his $30/barrel."

oil will be below $40 a barrel by the end of 2006.

Write it down.

Posted by vernon at 2006-06-30 12:17 PM

Hans

Why apologies to the libcoms for anything?
I want obama to apologize for trying to make his COMrats believe he is a man. And what's up with that condescending sneering scowl he wears on that ugly puss? I believe that the illegal little black boy is putting on a fascade, and if I can tell, then so can America's enemies. He is a phoney from day 1, save America, impeach him now.

What was up with that dog and pony show he had today with all the assclowns? little black boy pretending to be an economics expert?

Time for the red states to secede from this liberal cluster fuck.

"The Libcoms." That fucking cracks me up. That might be single lamest label anyone uses around here. The fact it gets used over and over, and by the same dipshit, only makes it more lame.

What a surprise you don't understand the offensiveness of the cartoon.

----

White guy as a monkey = funny
Black guy as a monkey = racist

Americans = hyper sensitive

Actually, more accurately...

White President as a monkey = funny
Black President as a monkey = racist

lawdy lawdy lawdy

you whaat folks is sho nuff gettin obstreperous!

What a douche. Apologizing for this shit. What next, no cartoons of Mohamed because you may insult someone. What about no cartoons of anybody because they are always demeaning to someone, somehow, based on physical looks or perceived or real intellectual deficiencies.

What a crock full of shit. I want an apology for all the times these fucks made fun of republicans. My sensibilities were horribly offended, and I can't sleep at night. Give me a break... Dress Bush up in a Hitler outfit or chimp-suit and it's funny as hell. But this, OMG!!!! Some actually wanted the guy arrested for advocating violence against President Obama. Welcome fascist state...

How could a nihilist like TooFuckingDumb be offended by anything? I thought you wackos believed that there was no meaning to life.

#16 | Posted by fwthom

Who said I was offended?

-----------------

Black guy as a monkey = racist

Americans = hyper sensitive

#26 | Posted by Pirate

I agree, how could any group possibly be sensitive after 400 years of bondage followed by 100 years of state sponsered oppression?

I want an apology for all the times these fucks made fun of republicans.
#29 | Posted by somoco

Well, after Republicans are held in bondage for 400 years followed by 100 years of state sponsored oppression, then maybe you'd have a point.

TFD - don't be a dummy - racism doesn't exist anymore. Racism died in the 60's, along with MLK. Get with the program.

Signed,
WPOD Too Stupid To Get Into College So I Blame It On Reverse Discrimination

Hey Sporto,

News flash, it was not a racist cartoon. It was not directed to Obama. Yet, people are sooo sensitive as to call for the arrest of the cartoonist. Murdoch flinched under the pressure.

It's bullshit...

I'd like to see a cartoon of Obama, Holder and Sharpton depicted as the see no, hear no, speak no evil monkeys. That would piss off some libs and give everyone a change to express their false indignation.

How weak! It was good humor when Bush was portrayed as a chimp over and over and over. NOW..it's uncalled for, racist, and demands an apology. There are people in this country who claim to be for civil rights, but they make their fortune keeping racist controversy alive. To those of you who buy it....go F yourselves. I am officially out of sympathy for anyone claiming racism, discrimmination, etc. Deal with it.

I agree, how could any group possibly be sensitive after 400 years of bondage followed by 100 years of state sponsered oppression?

----

At some point, you have to move on. Some people see slights when none are there. Not that there are self-serving opportunities trying to draw attention to themselves in an attempt to still seem relevant.

When I saw the cartoon it reminded me of Words, Words, Words mixed with the chimp Travis.

"Three monkeys hitting keys at random on typewriters for an infinite amount of time will almost surely produce Hamlet"

en.wikipedia.org

Of course, if you believe in evolution, we are all related to chimps so why is Sharpton against science?

"At some point, you have to move on."

Okay...only 455 years to go.

Okay...only 455 years to go.

----

That's what she said.

I was planning on drawing and publishing a "See no Evil, Hear no Evil, Speak no Evil" cartoon with Barack, Nancy, and Harry but I guess those three little monkeys (the ones usually depicted in that image) would be too offensive. Damn I am a genius

I think it would be a strong move for Obama to tell Sharpton to shut up. He claims he wants to be post-racial and post-partisan. He doesn't need Sharpton, he got elected without him and doesn't need his baggage.

CNN: "Murdoch's "apology leaves a lot more questions than it gives answers," Sharpton said Tuesday. "The question is what will guarantee that these kinds of things will not happen again. Let us make no mistake about it: We have seen two apologies in one week -- really one and a half apologies -- which is unprecedented, but clearly not far enough."

Nothing short of a public lynching (irony much?) of the artist will make this bastard happy. Will someone please, please, please get Mr. Sharpton on some meds? Please? I would never support shooting anyone, even Al Sharpton, but when I think about how different things would have been had the black community had Dr. King instead of Jackson & Sharpton & their opportunistic, parasitic ilk. Talk about losing the wrong guy.

In related news:
My son was in a program at school last night celebrating black history. There were more white kids participating than black & BY FAR more white parents in attendance. They even had to fill in with 3 alternates because the "African-American History from A-Z" segment was missing some letters. (Patrick was letter Z for Zion BTW noting the spirituals, no fussing about religion in school here I'm sure) All 3 kids that didn't show were black. Out of 26 letters, only 5 total were black. They took volunteers for the A-Z by the way so no one got "looked over" or anything.

All 5 essay winners for the "African-American I Admire Most" were white. There are more white kids than black in his elementary school but not this disproportionate by a LONG shot! My daughter's music teacher, black, was in her words "appalled & embarrassed by the lack of support of the black parents" for the program & the activities of the month of Feb overall. Over half the teachers grades K-4 are black so I'm sure they're thinking WTF?
Perhaps if Mr. Sharpton would get his head out of his ass & stop hanging out with militant, white hating, Black Panther castoffs, he'd find out what's going on in REAL America. Fuck Al Sharpton! He can kiss my lily white ass! It is going to be up to Obama to collar this dog & if he is the president of all like he says he is, he won't shirk the duty. It's PAST time!

"long over due apology"

PAGING WHITE GUILT!

Nevermind, here it is.

Screw you

"101 kiddieporn"

What logical fucking person isn't far more offended by a comparison to a PEDOPHILE than a monkey? Monkey's are by far higher on the evolutionary scale but all day long righties get kid diddler, child molester, kiidie porn lover, etc. You guys are super fucking hypocrites & I hope you all lose your jobs to fucking affirmative action. You make me SICK!

You guys are super fucking hypocrites & I hope you all lose your jobs to fucking affirmative action. You make me SICK!

It's always a joy to hear from the compassionate, "big umbrella" left.

100 years of state sponsered oppression

How about 50 years of state sponsored ass-kissing in the name of making things right which is REALLY about making your dumb black ass vote the way WE want. Libs condescend to minorities far more than ANYONE ELSE EVER!

40 acres & a mule!

It's always a joy to hear from the compassionate, "big umbrella" left

Actually there Goatie, I was TALKING to the left. They deserve it. Poetic justice so to speak.

Next time Rupe will use a Gibbon.

Eric Holder's Tragic Prison
By Ed Kaitz
Some years ago at a major university out west I was hired to teach minority students courses in expository writing. Most of my students were African-American. They were part of a "bridge program" at the university that allowed "provisional" students (those whose entrance scores were sub par) to demonstrate within a year that they could handle the academic regimen at the school.


I realized that most of the students had been accepted through an affirmative action policy, but I was committed to helping them make the grade. My strategy was simple: hitch their sense of self-respect and self-confidence to their performance in the class. In other words, help them to understand that self-esteem is a product of achievement.


There was one major problem with my strategy. Every one of my colleagues teaching in the same writing program was convinced that race, not achievement, was the basis for a minority student's self-esteem. This ideology pervaded the mentality of the entire staff -- black and white -- from the lowliest tutors to the director of the writing program. Students were persuaded by their progressive instructors to explore only one topic in their writing: white oppression. In fact, of the hundreds of essays and drafts that I read I cannot remember one essay that managed to stray from the central theme: minority = oppressed, white = oppressor.


There was one class period that I will never forget. During a break in my lecture I asked several of the students what they intended to choose as a major. Some of the students said "sociology" while others said "ethnic studies" or "communications." When I asked if anyone wanted to choose "engineering" as a major a student in the back of the room loudly declared that engineering was a "white" profession. When my jaw nearly hit the floor most of the students burst out in laughter. I had never heard anything like this. I quickly recovered however and quietly told myself that for the remainder of the class I was now going to play the student. I wanted to let these black kids teach me something I'd probably never forget.


For the next twenty minutes I stood at the chalkboard writing down the names of common professions. Next to the profession I let the students direct me to writing either "white" or "black" based on their perception of "correct" life choices for people of color. There was raucous laughter and the students were at the edge of their seats proclaiming their judgments in near unison. Mathematician? White. Architect? White. Athlete? Black. Musician? Black. Engineer? White. Chemist? White. Physicist? White. Journalist? (this one caused some confusion) Teacher? Black. Economist? White. Business? White.


After we had covered the board with our list, I asked the students to consider the possibility of crossing over to one of the "white" professions. The response was unanimous: such a compromise would render the student an "Oreo." The students believed that a black engineer, for example, was black on the outside but unfortunately white on the inside.


During the several years I taught in the minority writing program, foreign students would often be allowed to join the writing course in order to improve their English and composition skills. Of these the Nigerian students were by far my favorites. Their respect for scholarship, learning, and academic achievement was unmatched. Their essays ranged in interest from international affairs to advertising -- and the quality of their work was excellent.


What fascinated me was how the classroom dynamic changed with the addition of the students from Nigeria. The African-American students looked at the coal black Nigerians like they had landed from Mars. For their part, the Nigerians rarely showed any interest in the culture of the black students on campus.

I worked with several Nigerians and one in particular used to make me laugh. He used to stand in the aisle and shout in his beautifully accented English, "Can you believe it Thom, some of these supervisors didn't even finish high school!" The so-called African Americans used to grit their teeth in anger but never said a word. That was some funny shit. I would roar with laughter.

"Teacher? Black." That may be the most fascinating item on the list. If these kids were from inner-city environments, where very very few white teachers go (though I know two in New York City, both women), I get it. If they're from more suburban or midsize cities, it makes me wonder.

As for the Oreo effect, Scooter, what do you think about that? Is that cultural or a reflection of actual capability? I'm horrified (as a teacher) that a teacher assumes _anything_ about a student based on anything other than performance or actual behavior in class. I would say, from my experience, that a good many teachers are more fair-minded than that.

Figure it out, dittoheads,
Obama wasn't simply portrayed as a chimp. He was portrayed as a chimp who'd been SHOT DEAD. If someone had portrayed Bush that way, you assholes would have wanted the cartoonist sent to Gitmo.

Obama wasn't simply portrayed as a chimp. He was portrayed as a chimp who'd been SHOT DEAD. If someone had portrayed Bush that way, you assholes would have wanted the cartoonist sent to Gitmo.

#51 | Posted by igmoramus at 2009-02-25 02:36 PM | Reply


Dummy,
Tell me, what part of the stimulus bill did he write?

#51 | Posted by igmoramus at 2009-02-25 02:36 PM |

IF that were true, then the bigger issue would be the New York Post running a cartoon about shooting a sitting President (a crime) and not the imagined racist aspect (not a crime).

Obama wasn't simply portrayed as a chimp. He was portrayed as a chimp who'd been SHOT DEAD. If someone had portrayed Bush that way, you assholes would have wanted the cartoonist sent to Gitmo.

#51 | Posted by igmoramus

I've said it before, and I'll say it once more. I REALLY didn't see the chimp as being Obama. It was a critique of the content of the bill. Waaaaay oversensitive on this one.

I didn't see the chimp as Obama either. But... Obama is the public face of the stimulus bill, so I'm not surprised that some made that leap.

Just as I thought. No answer.

HP,


The cartoon is a take-off from a crazed chimp that had to be shot and killed because it was attacking people.

The ananlogy was that those writing the stimulus bill, as a result of how poorly it was crafted, were displaying the comparative intellect of a chimp, and now that this chimp has been killed, someone else needs to step-up and write the stimulus bill.

Cartoons by definition are supposed to be funny.

#17 | Posted by _HP_

Not necessarily. Political cartoons are intended to be satirical, or point out the foibles of a person or situation, or make a statement about the artist's personal beliefs.

Blondie and Dagwood they ain't. (Did I just date myself?)

Sana.
Absolutely. I was making a general statement. When I said "funny", in my mind I included satirical humor, but did not make that distinction. Good point.

Regardless, I just don't see the humor, satirical or not. And while JEFFJ does point out that two events happened at about the same time in history, I do not see the (strong) correlation of these events that is required to make it funny (or satirical); to make one say, "Ah!". On the other hand, the correlation made by those "offended" is both strong and obvious to me. So much so, I find it implausible that this correlation was unnoticed by so many prior to publication.

Cheers.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable