Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, February 16, 2009

The Obama administration has dropped the idea of appointing a "car czar" to oversee the revamping of General Motors and Chrysler and will instead put the politically delicate task in the hands of a presidential panel, a senior administration official with knowledge of the plan said Sunday night.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Zap

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

What does the tax-cheat-in-chief know about revamping an auto company?

I dont why...there doesnt seem to be a lack of democrats who cheat on thier taxes.....
or who arent under some investigation

I wouldn't appoint Geithner and Summers to head a committee to clean dogshit from my yard, let alone an auto company oversight group.

Geithner and Summers?
*snicker

Maybe that auto panel can redesign a car to look like a stagecoach with four horses pulling that will use alternative fuel. That should make the greenies happy and the unemployed can get jobs shoveling all the horse shit.

all right

GET A HORSE.

and heres a great JOB STIMULUS>

that would put a lot of buggy whip makers back to work.......

OR HAG>..you could just some of those whips you have in your basement.....

and the unemployed can get jobs shoveling all the horse shit.

#5 | Posted by fwthom at 2009-02-16 03:25 PM

You better get started updating that resume.

There is no one left who hasn't cheated on their taxes to select?

Unless an official is of Russian royal blood, can we ixnay with the arczay already? One redeeming American value is the fact that we don't have Czars running things!....or do we?

Hey, Joe. Do you have any evidence that _President_ Obama cheated on his taxes? If not, you've committed libel, or is that slander? Dude, policy difference is one thing, but did you ever criticize Bush critics for their immature and inaccurate names for the man who was then president? Think it through, pal.

He was referring to Tax-Dodgin' Timmy, just like the article was. Feel free to read it next time, before posting.

My post referenced Tim Geithner, as he was appointed to head the auto company panel. So while I'm sure you diligently read up on defamation law before you wrote your post, turns out it was a waste of time. You can still report me to Obama's lawyers if it will make you feel better though.

"We're going to need a restructuring of these companies" - so sez the article....I thought the CEO and the BODs would want to do that when it warrents such actions. Why wouldn't they just get the boot like the failed captains of industry used to get?

restructuring is quite obvious when sales are halved "all of the sudden".

Has anyone here bought a new car recently? did any of you try and get turned down for the loan?

this whole thing is contrived.


13 fuckin comments. Don't you get it???????


Geithner and Summers are so overwhelmed by Obama tasking them to fix the banks, to dump the auto companies onto their plate AT THE SAME TIME proves what a shit for brains leader obama IS.

There is NO WAY this is a good idea. After throwing a pandora's box of issues at the banks, with not one idea on how any of his ideas will be orchestrated.....how dare obama dump more on his plate?

Was it obama's idea or (male) rammed emanual's????

That's a good point, actually.

Sorry, Joe. I misunderstood. But when you throw "in chief" on the end of something, you might consider that a person could misread that as a play on "commander in chief." And no, I didn't read up on any laws, but thanks for the sarcasm.


What does the tax-cheat-in-chief know about revamping an auto company?

#1 | Posted by JOE at 2009-02-16 02:41 PM | Reply | Flag


Based on current performance, i would bet just about as much as an auto company Executive or CEO

wuh? no more caesars? what WILL we do?!?

Hey, Joe. Do you have any evidence that _President_ Obama cheated on his taxes?
Posted by pragmatist

And the Lefties want to legalize Pot? They need that like a 3rd nut.

Posting in thread full of retards

"And the Lefties want to legalize Pot? They need that like a 3rd nut.

#19 | Posted by wisgod"


Yeah but the point is, that's it's so widely available it might as well be legal (and taxed!)


And as a former hili salasi devotee, which do you think is more potent.

A joint of cal humbolt weed, or a bull shot glass of jack daniels?

HOWEVER obama must have been smoking it before he made this crap ass decision.......

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable