Just lovely. I wonder who it is that is in his ear about this? I also wonder just where it is he plans on putting the prisoners.

Let them move in with him.

Bullshit...

I'll believe it when I see it.

They could just live with his aunt... I hear she has legal issues too...

or divide them between the states that voted for him. let them have them but they can not be put in any kind of lock up. have to be allowed to live with society.

And move them to Israel.

This guy scares the shit out of me,but I hope he does well for the country.Maybe we can save some money by not having a rock star celebration in a few days,cant wait to see the close-up of Oprah crying!

As long as the prisoners aren't just released who cares where they stay? Think about it this way, there are plenty of prisons in the United States, closing Gitmo will save money.

Easy, remove the military installation - that's 90%, reassign them to afganistan.

Let the prisoners go that have committed no crimes- that's 5%

Put the prisoners that have committed minor shit, like the chauffeur, make them live in cuba - that's 2%.

The ones have we really know, even secretly, were involved with killing americans or terrorism in general, shoot 'em. - that's 2 individuals.

the rest are just local 'support personnel', ya know hookers and drug suppliers.

no problem.

but that doesn't bother me. I have long believed that not only should we recognize Cuba but we should make thema part of the United States. Look at all that beautiful, undeveloped carribean beach-front property.

Plus the cubans are good people. this base closing is going to remove a huge source of income. Maybe we are seeding a new revolution.

Good deal the one of the egregious staiuns upon the very fabric of what it means to be an AMerican will close. It can't happen soon enough really unless You don't grasp what it means to be an American.

Larry

Lippy kinda surprises me. But anyone NOT convicted of a specific crime - and I believe that's the overwhelming majority - should be released if the phrase "American justice" is ever to mean anything again. Yes, they'll sue the shit out of us, another trillion, most likely, but "Boston Legal" judge recently ruled that they have a perfect right to. herm

I wonder if 24 could round up some evidence?

then we can get judge judy to officiate, invite cooter and doc from down at the general store.

what surprises you? we can't go back in time and fix this shit. best to cut our losses and bug the fuck out.

After living in Cuba's tropical paradise, under so many inhumane conditions for so much time, these poor people at Gitmo that have been so much abused cannot be sent to Chicago, New York, or Detroit, for the cold winters there are too much for them. Send them to Hawaii. Put them up in one of those wonderful hotels at Waikiki Beach. Then have them visited by the Hollywood elites for their entertainment. Pamela A., Sean P., Richar G., and the like, get ready, have fun. All expenses should be paid by the NDP.

Where will these terrorists go?

I really hope these terorists kill some of your pussys familys. Then you will think different.

Maybe some of you libs can keep these killers in your homes.

I also wonder just where it is he plans on putting the prisoners.

Send them to crawford. Having your eye cut out with a BIC pen by Jack Bauer would be child's play compared to having to listen to Dubya explaining what a great president he really was.

Or they could just go quail hunting with Cheney...

"Where will these terrorists go?" I have a post for you on another thread. Terrorists don't exist. "Terrorists" kept Bush in power and are now gone. Saudis who flew into the WTC to protest Israeli occupation of Palestine are dead. Neither Bush wiretaps or Guantanamo torture have turned up any others. herm

You'll be fine, Cabo. Gitmo is only your lucky rabbit's foot. If you lose it your bowels won't turn into mint jelly and be spread on a rack of lamb.

Cabo-don't worry-the saudi royal family already has the Mecca Sheraton booked for them. Hot and cold running houris, all the goat they can eat-the saudialquedian royals know how to treat their heroes.

Maybe some of you libs can keep these killers in your homes.

Posted by cabo_vato at 2009-01-12 07:33 PM | Reply

Hey very simply if they are indeed killers then try them and convict them and send them to colorado. If they aren't release them easy peasy. Oh and Your right winged fucks at FGoxNews is stoking the fears of releasing them now on Foxnews. They are talking about the USS Cole incident and trying to get the AMerican populace to shed tears for the victims so they will ask Obama to keep Gitmo open. We knows Your type. You don't want justice You only want vengence and any arab will do. Don't give Me that poppycock.

Larry

Lary, herm,

Maybe you can sponsor them. Talk is cheap, do it.

Sponsor them , let them live in your homes. Will you do that?

Put your money and your family where your mouth is.

Oh, worra, worra, worra. How'd we live before without prisons in Cuba?

"Where will these terrorists go?"

"Terrorists don't exist."

Huh? There's crazy talk, and then there is this. Of course terrorists exist. Granted their threat to the average American has been severely overblown for political purposes, but to say they don't exist is insane.

Oh, worra, worra, worra. How'd we live before without prisons in Cuba?

#24 | Posted by Zed

it has been there for years.

Talk is cheap, do it.

#22 | Posted by cabo_vato

you're right, talk is cheap. let's see some evidence cretin. try them in american court. show what an ass you neo-cons are.

don't it get tiresome carrying around that big old chip all the fucking time?

We're gonna pay to ship them wherever they want to go. They haven't been convicted of anything. Your tax money will pay for it Cabo. Wadda ya think of that? Broken down firemen pay taxes too.

it has been there for years.

#27 | Posted by cabo_vato

The Base has been there for many years.
The prison has only been there since dumb ass deciderered to hold innocent people in a tropical prison outside the country so's the CIA could torture some of them into confessing to "terrorist acts" they never committed-or even planned-so that dipshit could have excuses to tear up the Constitution.

I'm sorry if that doesn't fit in with what you want to believe-I take that back-I don't care at all what you believe-I just know he's been acting a fool with this shit-and even though I know it won't happen-I really wish he could be imprisoned down there and treated the same as his innocent victims were.

"Huh? There's crazy talk, and then there is this. Of course terrorists exist."

Was Claus von Stauffenberg a terrorist?

Was Menachem Begin a terrorist?

Was Nelson Mandela a terrorist?

You'll find many in certain quarters who will claim as much.

But were they really terrorists?

Or does it depend on your "outlook"?

Hans

How many of you are willing to sponsor these terrorists into your own home?

But were they really terrorists?

Or does it depend on your "outlook"?

~Hans

From the perspective of the Nazis the French Resistance were terrorists.

From the perspective of King George III the rebellious American colonists were terrorists.

From the perspective of Israel the Palestinians are terrorists.

From the perspective of Palestine the Israelis are terrorists.

From the perspective of Afghanis and Iraqis the US are terrorists.

And so on and so forth.

Be Well.

"Was Nelson Mandela a terrorist?"

Not unless I've been severely misinformed about his history.

"Or does it depend on your "outlook"?"

My outlook is that people who deliberately and indescriminately target and murder civilians for the purpose of causing fear among those they target are terrorists. Al Qaeda for example, Hamas for another, the DC Snipers.

Just because it has sadly become a political football to be tossed around doesn't mean there aren't terrorists.

"My outlook is that people who deliberately and indescriminately target and murder civilians for the purpose of causing fear among those they target are terrorists."

You just described how some characterize Menachem Begin.

That also describes how some characterize Nelson Mandela.

And is describes how some characterized Claus von Stauffenberg.

So, once again, were they really terrorists?

Or does it depend on your "outlook"?

Hans

"Not unless I've been severely misinformed about his history."

Oops:

"Not unless I've been severely misinformed about his history."

Yes, you've been severely misinformed about Mandela's history.

Hans

"Oops:

U.S. has Mandela on terrorist list
You're welcome.

Hans

#36 | Posted by Hans"

Sounds like it was a mistake, not seriously calling him a terrorist:

"Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice calls the situation "embarrassing," and some members of Congress vow to fix it."

"So, once again, were they really terrorists?"

No, of course not. Terrorism lies in the intent. Islamic extremist groups, and the DC snipers as an example deliberately murder(ed) civilians in an attempt to accomplish their goals. That's terrorism.

How can you look at footage of 9/11, the Mumbai attacks, the bombings in Spain, and so on and so forth and actually question the existence of terrorism?

"Yes, you've been severely misinformed about Mandela's history.

Hans

#37 | Posted by Hans"

You are saying Nelson Mandela deliberately murdered civilians to scare the public into granting his groups' demands?

"How can you look at footage of 9/11, the Mumbai attacks, the bombings in Spain, and so on and so forth and actually question the existence of terrorism?"

Because I realize that global citizens do not all see the exact same thing.

In Northern Ireland who are the terrorists? The Catholics or the Protestants?

In Spain who are the terrorists? The Basques or the Nationalists?

In Vietnam who were the terrorists? The South Vietnamese or the Vietnamese nationalists?

Hans

"Deliberately murdered civilians...."

Bush's definition of terrorist included persons not in uniform, though perhaps part of a military chain of command, fighting our soldiers on a battlefield.

"Sounds like it was a mistake, not seriously calling him a terrorist"

Ding... Ding... Ding...

I think we have a winner!

Throwing around the word "terrorist" might be "a mistake."

And they said evolution was a myth.

Hans

So, you don't need to kill civilians to be s terrorist. You can see yourself as a soldier and fight only against other soldiers as part of your own country's militia and still be arrested as a criminal without rights.

"Because I realize that global citizens do not all see the exact same thing."

So Al Qaeda is not a terrorist organization, they just have a different point of view?

I'm sorry, but the deliberate slaughter of unarmed and innocent civilians to try to scare the public/government into agreeing to your demands is terrorism no matter what country you are from or language you speak.

"Terrorism lies in the intent."

Naivete personified.

The terrorism label lies in the intent of the labeler.

Hans

"Deliberate slaughter of unarmed and innocent civilians to try to scare the public/government into agreeing to your demands is terrorism..."

Each B-29 crew member over Japan, starting at least by 1944.

"I'm sorry, but the deliberate slaughter of unarmed and innocent civilians to try to scare the public/government into agreeing to your demands is terrorism..."

So, you agree, Menachem Begin and Nelson Mandela are terrorists.

Why didn't you say so in the first place?

Hans

"Bush's definition of terrorist included persons not in uniform, though perhaps part of a military chain of command, fighting our soldiers on a battlefield.

#41 | Posted by Zed"

Bush was wrong more times then we can keep track of, but just because he sucked beyond belief doesn't mean there aren't terrorists in the world.

Hans

Are you really trying to argue that throwing a molotv cocktail into a shoping mall is not a terrorist act?

I am just trying to figure out where you are coming from with your line of reasoning.

"Naivete personified."

Could you be more of a smug know-it-all please?

"Each B-29 crew member over Japan, starting at least by 1944."

LeMay referred to his nighttime incendiary attacks as "fire jobs." The Japanese nicknamed him "Demon LeMay". Also, the remaining Allied prisoners of war in Japan who had survived imprisonment to that time were frequently subjected to additional reprisals and torture after an air raid. LeMay was quite aware of the Japanese opinion of him he once remarked that had the U.S. lost the war, he fully expected to be tried for war crimes, especially in view of Japanese executions of uniformed American flight crews during the 1942 Doolittle raid.

"Are you really trying to argue that throwing a molotv cocktail into a shoping mall is not a terrorist act?

And if an American patriot had thrown a molotv cocktail into a pub filled with British nationals .... ???

Hans

"Are you really trying to argue that throwing a molotv cocktail into a shoping mall is not a terrorist act?

And if an American army had machine-gunned down an entire "tribe" of "natives"...???

Hans

"Could you be more of a smug know-it-all please?"

Perfection is a goal I think all people should seek.

Hans

"And if an American army had machine-gunned down an entire "tribe" of "natives"...???"

The united states was certainly guilty of terrorism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism whatever you want to call it against the Natives of this land.

"Perfection is a goal I think all people should seek"

Perfection isn't your goal. You're trying to come off as some ultra free thinking intellectual. "Look at me, I'm so enlightened I won't even call Osama Bin Laden a terrorist."

The link at the homepage that says something like "Terrorism increased by 5 times under Bush" you're not going to use that against the Republicans on this site?

And if an American patriot had thrown a molotv cocktail into a pub filled with British nationals .... ???

Yes

And if an American army had machine-gunned down an entire "tribe" of "natives"...???

no he is military. Either himself or his comanding officer would be guilty of war crimes.

What is your point? Do you belive that sometimes it is ok to kill inocent civilians?

Hans you are all over the thread about Terrorism increasing under Bush's watch. You don't make one mention of this no such thing as terrorism argument. You don't bring up Mandela once, but here on the thread about Obama you do.

I think its time for me to switch to a registered Independent. I've had it with the members of both parties and your blind partisanship.

Yeah right GREEndad, its easy to say when you havent lost family members. They should drop one into each liberal family member and what whach them cut their head off burn the body and drag it around then let the fun, because its torture, begin again.

"The united states was certainly guilty of terrorism, genocide, ethnic cleansing, terrorism whatever you want to call it against the Natives of this land."

No! Really?

Hans

How many of you are willing to sponsor these terrorists into your own home?

#32 | Posted by cabo_vato at 2009-01-12 08:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

Give them a trial. Is that so hard? Is that so anti-american?

Bush has already released hundreds of gitmo detainees. Where they all terrorists? If not, since he's your president, can they live with you?

What an asinine and unthinking talking point that is: "Put em in your home!"

The banality of evil strike again.

"What is your point? Do you belive that sometimes it is ok to kill inocent civilians?"

Okay? Not at all.

But that's the rationalization of all conquering armies. Innocent civilians are "the price paid."

Hans

"No! Really?

Hans

#59 | Posted by Hans "

That's what you wanted wasn't it? For someone to say the US was guilty of some terrible crimes too?

Now quick, run back to the thread about terrorism (which on Obama threads doesn't exist) increasing under Bush's watch (terrorism of course exists on threads where it can be painted in a negative way against Bush) and really give those Republicans hell for it. Doesn't make you look like a blind partisan at all.

"For someone to say the US was guilty of some terrible crimes too?"

It was?

Well color me surprised.

Hans

"I think its time for me to switch to a registered Independent. I've had it with the members of both parties and your blind partisanship."

Well color me disappointed.

Hans

Just a shot in the dark: You're a 19 year old college student who has been influenced by some far leftist professor, and now you think you know everything because you've taken freshman philosphy. You are smug and egotistical and you aren't nearly as smart as you tell yourself you are. Grow up big guy.

I'd love to keep playing but I've got bills to pay and lunches to make for the kids. Some of us have to be up before 10:30 and don't start the day with our 1 credit hour martial arts course.

"Just a shot in the dark"

Swing and a miss.

And rather disappointing: The lack of curiosity and Internet skills.

"You are smug and egotistical..."

Guilty, I suppose.

Hans

"Grow up big guy."

Yep. Guilty.

;0)

Hans

"I'd love to keep playing..."

Of course you would.

Hans

Sponsor them , let them live in your homes. Will you do that?

Put your money and your family where your mouth is.

#23 | Posted by cabo_vato at 2009-01-12 07:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

Are you COMPLETELY retarded?

First, you wish that the people in GITMO kill our families and then you ask us to sponsor them?

Shit-stain, why don't you let them live with you? C'mon Keyboard Commando....take them in and then tell the cops they tried something 'funny' and had to be dealt with.

You do realize that most of the GITMO detainees were rounded up without any exchange of gunfire, right? Many there are there because of land disputes back in Afghanistan. The Military would go around flashing cash for any info regarding 'terrrrrrrists' in the area and guess what, people simply turned old family enemies in for the cash.

Do it, Billy Badass, take some terrrrrrists into your adobe.

This is a typical Obama plan: close Gitmo and worry about where to put the prisoners later.

Do it, Billy Badass, take some terrrrrrists into your adobe.

They'd probably be nicer roommates than Blackwater guards or one of my roomies last last year who was perfectly cool with letting his food rot in the refrigerator. Though you might still want to hide your copy of The Satanic Verses.

What is going to happen to these really dangerous people at Gitmo?

The original countries don't want them and if he brings them here--big mistake.

Obama won't get a pass on that one either.

Time to watch 24---

How about this-

If a detainees have nowhere to go yet don't pose much of a security risk, have them build an apartment complex for themselves on the old prison grounds. Employ them as labor on the base. Let them create a co-operative, policed by the US army. Let them move their immediate families in with them, and set up a school on the base for their children. They're offshore on a military base where the government can inspect anything, material or electronic, going in or out. This isn't much of a risk. Give their families the freedom to travel, but if they run off to somewhere in the boonies of Pakistan or whatnot, they don't get to come back.

If a detainee does pose a high risk to national security, try them in US courts, not secret tribunals, and send them to prison. If these guys are as bad as the government says, there should be no problem with hitting them with enough consecutive sentences under preexisting laws to send them away for life.

Oh yeah, the "risk" posed by a detainee is determined by a panel of judges with the authority and security privileges to subpoena any relevant information. Let congress and the president bicker about who to appoint to the panel.

"And rather disappointing: The lack of curiosity and Internet skills."

I didn't look up anything about you because I don't care to, not because of any "skills." God how full of yourself are you. I would love to know what you think is so special about yourself that should have driven my curiosity and internet browser. But it will have to wait until tomorrow to learn how wonderful and great of an internet blogger you are.

"And rather disappointing: The lack of curiosity and Internet skills."

-But it will have to wait until tomorrow to learn how wonderful and great of an internet blogger you are.

I'm not sure who started all of this, but if your sole measure of yourself is how great of an "internet blogger" you are, I suggest the option of suicide. If you do it right, it's painless (I hear). Seriously, that's gotta be like flaunting your masturbation skills. You might never get laid, but at least you know how to work the one armed bandit.

YOu liberals all want to give these scum the rights that we have. Someone want to tell me in any war where soldiers dressed as civilians were tried in a civil court anywhere?

"YOu liberals all want to give these scum the rights that we have. Someone want to tell me in any war where soldiers dressed as civilians were tried in a civil court anywhere?

#77 | Posted by JMFJ"

Just don't lump all us Democrats together. I want Gitmo closed, but I certainly don't want the prisoners there just released in some final spite to President Bush. As long as they aren't just released back into the public I don't care where they are held. I'm fine with the military tribunals reviewing their cases. If they're a real threat to the civilized world, then keep them locked up, but if they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time or turned over for someone to make a quick buck then turn them loose. Take a fair look at every case, and I'm more then willing to trust the military to say who is still a threat.

Probably always a threat to Cheney & Bush...& a few other cabinet members...who believe waterboarding is good way to justify their sorry lives

There is nothing wrong with Waterboarding.
It is part of hazing at VMI.

"YOu liberals all want to give these scum the rights that we have."

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Inconvenient sometimes....those pesky rights....

Guantanamo is THE perfect example of why individuals need RIGHTS....many of those held there did nothing yet were held, without charge, without attorneys for years. A national disgrace even if we do have a problem with terrorists.

The original countries don't want them and if he brings them here--big mistake.

Obama won't get a pass on that one either.

#72 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-01-12 10:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

'Big Mistake'?

Tell us why that is. What would be the 'big mistake'
in bringing them here?

Give us your doomsday scenario regarding moving prisoners into the CONUS.

Ahat without knowing when or what they will do with the prisoners.

"I also wonder just where it is he plans on putting the prisoners"

He hasn't thought that far ahead. Had to hurry up & put out the "feel good" moment for his minions.

"Tell us why that is. What would be the 'big mistake'
in bringing them here?"

Move them into the country here where I am and let some good old boys know it & problem solved!

this base closing is going to remove a huge source of income

~LipZ

Whaa?

3,000 dollars a year?

That's "huge"?

The US base in Guantanimo is the oldest foreign base the US has and the only one within a country that the US has no diplomatic relations with.

The Cubans consider the lease illegal and want the US gone and they have every right to think so.

There is nothing wrong with Waterboarding.

~tIMBECILE.

Do you stay awake nights trying to think up new ways to FAIL or does it just come naturally to you?

Waterboarding as a torture technique has been around fer thousands of years. The only innovation here is that Dumbya and crew are the first asswipes on the planet to try and pretend that it isn't torture.

People have died through the use of this technique. Others have had their minds shattered for life.

You FAIL as a human being.

AGAIN.

Be Well.

Whether these individuals are US citizens or not they should be treated by the same standards as our citizens.

If a case can be made that they have committed a terrorist act then try them, convict them, and punish them.

If no case can be made then release them. They should not be convicted based on their beliefs or our interpretation of their beliefs. They should only be tried for their actions.

We are supposed to be Americans and uphold certain standards. Two of the most important, to me, are innocent until proven guilty and free speech.

Closing GITMO is a symbolic gesture and nothing more. Unless Obama is planning on simply releasing all of the prisoners there, they will be moved to another prison facility. The whole process will cost the taxpayers money, but what the hell.

Cowboy,

The problem is that a lot of these assholes surrendered in battle. Proving they are guilty of a crime is tenuous at best. If the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan were over, I'd better appreciate your point. The problem is that if we start releasing all of our detainees our military is going to (with a nudge and a wink) begin executing combatants who have surrendered in battle.

Danni says Gitmo is a "national disgrace". This is the type of thinking that will lead Obama into doing things, like closing Gitmo, just to appease other countries of the world who are unhappy with us. The next 4 years, when looked back upon, will be called the Great Appeasement and all the libs will be so happy that they have made the world much more pleased with our policies.

That's one of the problems with you libs, you want everyone to like you and will do anything to make that happen. This is no way to live or to run a country.

That's one of the problems with you libs, you want everyone to like you and will do anything to make that happen.

#90 | Posted by everlong at 2009-01-13 03:31 PM | Reply

It's because they were all losers and outcasts in high school and college and are dying to be accepted.
FACT!!!

"It's because they were all losers and outcasts in high school and college and are dying to be accepted."

Pretty much describes Bill Gates.

Hans

Pretty much describes Bill Gates.

Hans

#92 | Posted by Hans at 2009-01-13 03:41 PM | Reply

(As I tell Hagbard, back off my bait, it's not intended for the likes of you)

Pretty much describes Bill Gates.

I agree with the little coward elect. We should release them. Why? Because we can't shoot them while they are detainee's. They "WILL" show back up on the battlefield.

By the way, if anyone cares. The Pentagon said today that 61 of the prisoners they have released from Gitmo have gone back to being terrorists. Not that anyone gives a shit about that sort of thing though.

"Not that anyone gives a shit about that, though...."

How about that. A guy on another thread thinks Bush fucks up so much because he wants to be nice to everyone. Another example, one supposes.

"The Pentagon said today that 61 of the prisoners they have released from Gitmo have gone back to being terrorists."

So why did they release them?

Typical Bush Administration incompetence.

A competent administration cannot come soon enough.

Hans

I agree. Finally, after eight years of war we can get some cowards back in the White House. There are a lot of folks out there in the world who are sooo... happy and grateful.

CPBCOP needs to declare a personal jihad and take the fight to the enemy already. Or are you just a big pussy?

First he announces he's NOT going to close it, then announces he WILL close it?

Needs to make up his fucking mind.

Though for what it counts, I'm glad it's being closed. If he doesn't change his mind again tomorrow.

This terrorist torture bullshit should have never made the news. The methods we use to gain information should not be open to discussion by anyone except the people who stand between Americans and the Low Life Cowards who are out to kill us if we refuse to convert to their phoney religion. They have no rights under the Geneva Convention as they represent no Country on this planet and any person living in America that brings up the use or methods of gathering information from the scumbags should be taken out and face a firing squad for treason in time of war. This would rid the Country of most Democrats and their friends at C.A.R.E and other islamic cesspools in our Country.

and any person living in America that brings up the use or methods of gathering information from the scumbags should be taken out and face a firing squad for treason in time of war.

I guess that includes the president, vice president, and various others from the bush admin who have described some of these methods, yes?

It is the Patriotic Duty of every American(Notice I said American I didn't say AMerican Citizen there IS a real difference) that they Demand that their Government abide by the Rules that We agreed to and to treat ones in Our Custody Humanely and without infliction of Pain and Suffering. We are SUPPSED to be the Shining example for the world to follow(At least that is what We profess). How can You condemn Your supposed enemy when You Yourself behave in such a manner that betrays the very foundation on what this Country is SUPPOSED to be about. Truth Justice and Freedom for all. The ones who are traitors are the ones who do not hold their Government accountable when they act very badly.

Larry

PS The Supreme Court declared the Detainees had Constitutional rights as well as basic 3rd Geneva Convention Protections.

This would rid the Country of most Democrats and their friends at C.A.R.E and other islamic cesspools in our Country.

It's always nice to see someone plunk down a few grand for a computer, make a log in name, and then profess their wish to see more than half of his(?) fellow countrymen summarily executed.

Drink some drano, "badeye". Do it for your family and neighbors.

PS The Supreme Court declared the Detainees had Constitutional rights as well as basic 3rd Geneva Convention Protections.

#105 | Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-01-14 06:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

How dare those filthy democrats and islamics? lol

How dare those filthy democrats and islamics? lol

Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-01-14 06:28 AM | Reply

Yeah No shit buddy. LMAO Terrible Supreme COurt. Why does the SCOTUS hate AMerica so much.(God that NEVER gets old saying that)

Larry

Kinda sad when 6 republican appointed SCOTUS members, and 3 democratic appointed ones tell Bush to go fuck himself, isn't it? Kinda proves how unlawful and far FAR right wing W's "thinking" is.

Keep in mind, this court is usually 5-4 in favor of conservative values most of the time, but they have repeatedly shot down the Bush admin's "legal" arguments on gitmo detainees over the years. Repeatedly.

Yeah it's such a shame ALexandrite and yet there are still people who STILL to this very day support Dubya. Amazing just doesn't quite reflect the outlandishness of it all.

Larry

Kinda funny the pieces of shit SCOTUS has changed their voting style now the president is leaving.

I thought the SCOTUS was not elected so they would follow law and not the party in power. Guess we have another branch of the government that is corrupt through party standings.

What are you talking about, moneywar? the SCOTUS has been ruling against bush on Gitmo for YEARS. They've been really conservative on almost everything else, though.

Notable exception being Kelo.

"kelo v new london" that is.

Alex,

rarely have they ruled in such an over whelming majority. Most of the time it is 5 to 4 and now the big sudden change.

Pieces of shit.

"kelo v new london" that is.

Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-01-14 06:47 AM | Reply

THAT one was a fucking disgrace and a half.

Larry

THAT one was a fucking disgrace and a half.

Larry

Posted by LarryMohr at 2009-01-14 06:51 AM | Reply

Yeah, and the liberals (with souters help) pushed that through 5-4. Disgraceful shit indeed.

That land was used for a shopping center which failed. Hardly what eminent domain was intended for.

"A competent administration cannot come soon enough"

Hans

Keep waiting there buddy. This one is shaping up to be a disaster of grand proportions not so much by Obama but his minions & the collossal amount of unrealistic expectations they've put in place. Heavy is the head that wears the crown. I for one will be glad when the chosen one is in office & the left has to quit all this Monday morning quarterbacking & take the hits.

So why did they release them?

Typical Bush Administration incompetence.

A competent administration cannot come soon enough.

#98 | Posted by Hans

I thought you wanted them all released. WTF over.

I thought you wanted them all released. WTF over.

That's when they thought that they were good guys. Now that they find out they really are bad guys, it's Bush's fault.

Just lovely. I wonder who it is that is in his ear about this? I also wonder just where it is he plans on putting the prisoners.

#1 | Posted by everlong
--------------------
I don't endorse this idea but if I did, I'd send them to a NY prison and encourage them to bend over and pray multiple times a day with BIG Bubba as a cell mate. I wonder how long it would take them to become atheists?

Lonnie

Why did they let them go, Hans? Oh, well it couldn't have been pressure from leftist groups coming from all sides could it? You think Bush just had a compassionate moment and decided to let them go? You can't have it both ways, Hans.

You can't have it both ways, Hans.

#121 | Posted by everlong

He'll respond when he get's his marching orders from the Community Organizer - Elect.

He'll respond when he get's his marching orders from the Community Organizer - Elect.

First he'll dig into his archives to see if he has any dirt on you and use it as a deflection tool

Move them into the country here where I am and let some good old boys know it & problem solved!

#85 | Posted by HATEBIGGOV at 2009-01-13 03:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

Suuuuuure!

We have another DR Keyboard Commando in our presence.

The next 4 years, when looked back upon, will be called the Great Appeasement and all the libs will be so happy that they have made the world much more pleased with our policies.

That's one of the problems with you libs, you want everyone to like you and will do anything to make that happen. This is no way to live or to run a country.

#90 | Posted by everlong at 2009-01-13 03:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

Another 'Appeasement' accusation. How cute.

Can you even define Appeasement without looking it up?

Send all the terrorists to the blue states.