Nuts!

This thread should be about as much fun as yesterday's Jimmy Carter thread. Let the rightwing moaning and outrage commence.

Come on, Moder8. Pelosi is a joke and you know that full well.

Hagbard "nowhere close to right-wing" Celine.

"Let the rightwing moaning and outrage commence."

Rightwing???

They'll be lovin' it.

Her pathetic ineptitude will provide them with an endless supply of ammo.

We on the left are the ones who should be moaning.

Screw the rightwing, the leftwing should be up in arms too.

pelosi should be bannished, piece of garbage the truck won't even pick up.

Let the rightwing moaning and outrage commence.
Posted by moder8

Do you think anyone on the right thought that the Democratic boobs in Congress wouldn't re-elect her?

Nancy PeLOUSY?

Again?

Where's all the Hope and Change and rainbow-shitting puppies that Spud was promised?/snark>

Semi-inevitable really but a bad call nonetheless.

Pelosi, Reid and Finestein need to go away.

Be Well.

at least spud agrees with me. or at least is willing to agree with me.

It's becoming a pattern here that if you don't give full support to whatever your party does, you're labeled as being a member of the other side. that just isn't the case. it's like saying you're un-american for criticizing the government.

I understand that this actually is the job of some posters here, to support the democratic party no matter what they do. spin control. I get it.

Not to worry dr left, she'll be under rahm emanual's thumb in no time

That Pathetic Employee Lousy On Serious Issues makes My skin crawl. Couldn't they have picked someone else??

Larry

Its been tough watching your cognitive dissonance kicking in lately, lar.

Nancy is the gift that keeps on giving the year round.

Not to worry dr left, she'll be under rahm emanual's thumb in no time

#9 | Posted by DavetheWave

THAT would probably be a serious improvement.

The concensus almost everywhere seems to be that Pelosi sucks. I wish California had been paying attention.

If you look at anything about pelosi, it is about the money.

Nothing about her is for the interest of those she represents. Everything she puts on board is also laced with how much money will flow her way.

pelosi attains her position because so many of the congressmen owe her money and she lords that overthem like a queen to the lord. Fealty is alive and well in our governmental empire.

Nuts!

#1 | Posted by Whatsleft

nuts cried the queen, if i had two i'd be king. harry laughed, he didn't have any either.

In celebration, she's going out and getting her whole skin replaced.

I thought she moulted twice a year.

Must be an anomaly.

Come now--Nancy "Stretch" Pelosi isn't That bad! (snark) ;o)

It could be worse--not sure how--but it could be worse.

It could be worse--not sure how--but it could be worse.

~Murphy

Pelosi coulda been born as a part of a set of twins.

Be Well.

"I wish California had been paying attention.

#14 | Posted by Whatsleft "

She's a congressperson, not a senator. You don't get to blame the whole state.

Oh geeze, now we have to be subjected to the adventures of "Pussy Pelosi, Part II"?

She's a weak wuss. Couldn't the Dems have gotten rid of Reid and Pelosi and instead have put in two stronger (and brighter) individuals who would have gotten things done?

rainbow shitting puppies!!!

yeaaaa!!!

I felt so sorry for big O doing the photop yesterday with her.

Couldn't the Dems have gotten rid of Reid and Pelosi and instead have put in two stronger (and brighter) individuals who would have gotten things done?

#23 | Posted by CalifChris

Looks like once again, the cream has risen to the top.

Losers re-electing a bigger loser, nothing new here. You get what you vote for.

She's a weak wuss. Couldn't the Dems have gotten rid of Reid and Pelosi and instead have put in two stronger (and brighter) individuals who would have gotten things done?

Posted by CalifChris at 2009-01-06 08:05 PM | Reply

She makes Me wanna vomit.She really does.

Larry

"Let the rightwing moaning and outrage commence."
Rightwing???
They'll be lovin' it.
Her pathetic ineptitude will provide them with an endless supply of ammo.
We on the left are the ones who should be moaning.

Dave is right. We rightwingers are loving it. She is indeed pathetic and inept. Wait until the midterms.

Impeachment is off the Table

Millionaire Cunt

Shares common interests with other

greedfuckers,like Bush & Cheney

Pelosi...again?

*VOMIT*

This thread should be about as much fun as yesterday's Jimmy Carter thread. Let the rightwing moaning and outrage commence.

Ahahahaha!

The people griping about Nancy the most for the last 2+ years have been those on the left...not that the turds on the right haven't given their best efforts.

Why else would Cindy Sheehan be attempting to unseat her? Is Cindy now a right winger?

nutless, why not end it all and put one in your ear?

(I ask this in total seriousness)
Are the elections fixed?

Seriously?

How stupid is the American public?

Nancy Pelosi is what happens when failure is rewarded just for being a woman.

They elected GWB. Twice.

dammit wisgod, that ain't cool.

dammit wisgod, that ain't cool.

#36 | Posted by dxlingr

Your right. I was trying to get into the mood with the rest of the lefty drama queens. I'm sorry Nutcase. We'll be OK.

They elected GWB. Twice.

I wonder when the sheepleherders are going to take that off their obligatory 'must bleat daily' list?

The Goatman wants to know about bleating? LOL

The Goatman wants to know about bleating? LOL

Trust me -- I know bleating when I hear it! LOL

They elected GWB. Twice.
#35 | Posted by moder8

That's "elected" loosely defined, but yeah.

"Wait until the midterms."

Does this fall into the same category as "Democrats will never win another election"?

If so, you're behind the times.

Hans

"Losers re-electing a bigger loser, nothing new here. You get what you vote for.

#26 | Posted by SmartyPants"

You got the stupid Bush, 4000+dead, and a couple trillion dollar hole in your wallet. Bet you're fucking proud, aren't you?

Boo hiss. Pelosi is useless.

You don't get to blame the whole state.

#22 | Posted by Snark_Needleton

Sorry.

She can continue to do the job that few have done as poorly and none with such blatant disregard for the voters wishes. Keep up your style of work P-woman and we will all be in the shitter.(farther)

The republicans stood up and cheered.

The republicans stood up and cheered.

#47 | Posted by r_zeitgeist

Ouch!

Awful choice. Dems got elected in 2006 partly because she lied to the American public promising to send up "clean bills". Re-electing her is a slap in the face to us all.

FF for R_ZEITGEIST

Wow! Danforth and I agree on something within the democratic side of the house.

"Re-electing her is a slap in the face to us all.

#49 | Posted by Danforth "

Uh, no. But do continue to flap your knee-jerk gums.

Uh, yes. But do continue to flap those useless gums.

"Uh, no."

So what did YOU think she meant by promising clean bills? And how would you characterize promising something good, and never even attempting to follow through?

"Re-electing her is a slap in the face to us all."

No, it isn't. Except for those who seek Nirvana.

Otherwise, it is SOP.

Hans

Danforth, don't bother. Lettuce has found the bottle her husband hid....

wisgod,

Because its fun to be alive and there is so much time to be dead.

Designing heavy automated machinery, skiing, boating again soon with gas down, abalone diving, exploring the Keys, sex, drugs, and rock & roll.

Last year I saw Steely Dan for the fifth time, Crosby-Stills-Nash, Jackson Browne, Elvis Costello, Bonny Rait, Emmy Lou Harris, The Police, Sonoma Jazz & Wine Festival, Santana, Hendrix Experience....

Since you're a wise god one way or the other shouldn't matter much to you, huh?

But, fuck our corrupt Government, especially the criminals in charge.

Re-electing her is a slap in the face to us all.

"it is SOP."

Like I said....

Since you're a wise god one way or the other shouldn't matter much to you, huh?

But, fuck our corrupt Government, especially the criminals in charge.

#57 | Posted by nutcase

The corrupt Goverment extends to both sides of the aisle. And I'm sick and fucking tired of it. Glad to hear you're doing well. Seriously.

it is SOP

I wonder how we got into the problem in the first place.........this kind of voter complacency.

"Lettuce has found the bottle her husband hid....

#56 | Posted by wisgod "

Wow. Multi-thread yooper stupidity. Nice.

I wonder how we got into the problem in the first place.........this kind of voter complacency

Unbreakable blind allegiances to a specific party without knowing the candidates. Today 75% of the people could go vote without even knowing the candidates' names. They just look for the R or D on the ballot. Brainless and unimaginative these people are.

As a matter of fact, I have someone affiliated with the league of women voters that looks over all those tiresome propositions and recommends certain votes....I vote no on needless spending - construction lobbies be damned.

Wow. Multi-thread yooper stupidity. Nice.

#61 | Posted by LetUsPrey

Yoopers are from Upper Michigan, twit. Try to focus those 3 fucking marbles in your spacious head...I'm from Southern Wisconsin. Thus ends the lesson.

Funny how you "R"s always whine about electing the incumbant when it's a "D", but you don't seem to make the same leap when it's an "R".....Coleman, anyone?

"Like I said...."

If what is expected is standard operating procedure then it is hardly a "slap in the face."

If what is expected is a "slap in the face" then it is standard operating procedure.

If a "slap in the face" is standard operating procedure then it is what's expected.

Like I said...

Hans

Upper Peninsula. Stupid as a yooper. That's you, Cheese-fuck.

Let's all agree--

Pelosi is a POS!

So are you, McAnkles, but you can still post here.

"Like I said...."

I can't wait for the Supreme Court nominations.

Hans

And Hans--why are you posting bullshit with a post from 2000 on the Franken thread and counting the votes?

I was not here in 2000.

Get a life or a new schtick. 'o)

Letusprey,

LOL! You get a funny flag.

"Let's all agree--

"Pelosi is a POS!"

No, let's all agree, Pelosi is SOP.

Hans

Upper Peninsula. Stupid as a yooper. That's you, Cheese-fuck.

#67 | Posted by LetUsPrey

If you're trying to make an ass out of yourself tonight, go to bed. Mission accomplished.

Let us pray--you need to do some of your handle..

#73--FF for Hans--

That was good...lol

I wonder how we got into the problem in the first place.........this kind of voter complacency.

#60 | Posted by moneywar at 2009-01-06 09:47 PM | Reply | Flag:

Television shows, the media, our little useless tech toys.

Carlin was right. We've been bought off, and we came cheap.

Prey, McAnkles, prey. I figured you'd be too stupid to get it, and I was right.

"I was not here in 2000."

"It's deja vu all over again" --Yogi Berra

Hans

No not at all LUP--

You are proving to be a POS--but you can stay all the same.

"If you're trying to make an ass out of yourself tonight, go to bed. Mission accomplished.

#74 | Posted by wisgod"

Look, pops, you're the one who needs the Nyquil and a long nap. So shut the fuck up and get the fuck out. You're a tired old retread who hasn't had anything original to say in like 10 years...but if Phil Henreid is still on the air I guess you get a pass.

"#73--FF for Hans--

"That was good...lol"

;0), thank you.

I do have my moments.

Hans

Hans--

I was not posting here on the DR in 2000.

I did not even know about this place until about 2003.

"You are proving to be a POS--but you can stay all the same.

#80 | Posted by MURPHY "

Isn't it lovely that the defeated pick the winners?

But as to your post--(eg Dan Rather)

I was saying to count all the votes during the Bush Gore 2000 election.

Isn't it lovely that the defeated pick the winners?

#84 | Posted by LetUsPrey

Mamma Mia!

"I was not posting here on the DR in 2000.

"I did not even know about this place until about 2003."

Perhaps. Yet, we all carry with us our memories and prejudices from 2000... then, before and after.

And present them here, everyday.

Hans

You're a tired old retread who hasn't had anything original to say in like 10 years...Posted by LetUsPrey

Wow. 10 years? Did Mom and Dad tell you about it?

I was saying to count all the votes during the Bush Gore 2000 election.

#85 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-01-06 10:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

They didn't, despite your loud protestations.

As I quoted...

"It's deja vu all over again" -- Yogi Berra

Hans

"Did Mom and Dad tell you about it?

#88 | Posted by wisgod"

You didn't get the memo?

Yes they did Bet--

They counted the votes 3 times and then wanted only the Dem precincts to be hand counted and they got thru most of those.

What the media did afterwards was the most telling--they recounted the ballots and found GW Won the state of FL and POTUS.

What the media did afterwards was the most telling--they recounted the ballots and found GW Won the state of FL and POTUS.

Posted by MURPHY at 2009-01-06 10:10 PM | Reply

That's not what they found. That's what the headlines said; but we could go round and round about that until you turn blue. The upshot is that the SC of the US stopped the count and declared a winner.

Of course, the media. They're run by a big eastern syndicate, you know.

Pelosi is awful--for the Dems and the country.

She and Reid will beat the shit out of Obama even with Rahm.

Obama claims that "Earmarks" will not be apart of the trillion that he spends to "stimulate" the economy.

Problem is that the whole stimulus proposed is Earmarks bs.

I was against the Bush and that corrupt Paulson bailout--and I am against Obama's new new new deal for bailouts that will worsen the economy.

Hans you may go to the archives..lol--;o)

"Yes they did Bet--"

No. They did not.

Bet--the media outlets went to the ballots and found Bush won the state of FL by 357 votes.

Is there a link that shows differently?

----As for Franken and Coleman--I want all the votes counted and counted only ONCE.

Murphy-
The Supreme Court per curiam decision stopped the recount and declared bush the winner, notwithstanding however else you wish to spin it.

Why is this relevent with 14 days left in an 8 year term?

Murph

So far, they've only been counted once.

So you DON'T want Coleman to challenge?

Murphy-
re: Bet--the media outlets went to the ballots and found Bush won the state of FL by 357 votes.

Under one scenario, but not under most of them.

---As for Franken and Coleman--I want all the votes counted and counted only ONCE.

Establish how votes are being counted twice.

Why is this relevent with 14 days left in an 8 year term?

LOL. I was thinking the exact thing

"Why is this relevent with 14 days left in an 8 year term?

#99 | Posted by wisgod "

Not much on historical accuracy, are you?

Not much on historical accuracy, are you?

you think boyd and murphy are going to change historical accuracy? LOL

Murphy-
Instead of bringing closure, the media consortium report has simply given ammo to partisans of all stripes who all see what they want to see in the results. The consortium -- which included media heavyweights like the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, the Associated Press and CNN, among others -- concluded that if the Florida Supreme Court-ordered recount were allowed to continue, or if there were only recounts in the four counties that Gore first asked to be recounted, Bush would have hung on to a narrow lead. But under all other recount scenarios, especially those that might have counted overvotes, in which a voter marked more than one choice for president, Gore would have prevailed. In addition, the media report concluded, more Floridians went to the polls on Election Day intending to vote for Al Gore than George W. Bush.

Not much on historical accuracy, are you?

#103 | Posted by LetUsPrey

What are you going to do? Click your Ruby slippers 3 times, wake up in Kansas and tell us "There's no place like home"?

Uh, no. But you can keep all your Judy Garland records and "Broadway night" at the local gay bar.

Why is this relevent with 14 days left in an 8 year term?

LOL. I was thinking the exact thing

#102 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 10:24 PM | Reply | Flag:

I understand that you would each like to put the Bush Presidency behind you. In that I agree.

Uh, no. But you can keep all your Judy Garland records and "Broadway night" at the local gay bar.

#107 | Posted by LetUsPrey

Winding down or coming down?

Unlike you two, my anger is not tempered by the embarassing fact that I voted for the SOB.

Why is this relevent with 14 days left in an 8 year term?

LOL. I was thinking the exact thing

#102 | Posted by goatman

Or as George told Dick, "Looks like we're gonna make a clean getaway."

Unlike you two, my anger is not tempered by the embarassing fact that I voted for the SOB.

#110 | Posted by BetelG

Gore or Kerry?

I understand that you would each like to put the Bush Presidency behind you. In that I agree.

I'm not sure what this has to do with my wondering 'why debate an 8 YO election', but I've expected odd segues from you, boyd.

"Winding down or coming down?

#109 | Posted by wisgod "

Flip a coin, Harvey.

Goatman-
Because he's still President.

Unlike you two, my anger is not tempered by the embarassing fact that I voted for the SOB

So you harbor untempered anger? About what?

"Gore or Kerry?

#112 | Posted by wisgod"

GHWB or Dole?

WisGod-
Fortunately for all of us, I'm sure someone named "WisGod" voted for Bush twice.

I think I can speak for about 4/5ths of the population when I say, "thanks a lot asshole".

Goatman-
re: "So you harbor untempered anger? About what?"

Nothing much. Just you guys giving Bush the keys of state and watching him wrap it around a tree.

Live and learn...

What, no witty comebacks to the obvious fact that Bush took a strong nation and brought it to its knees?

"But under all other recount scenarios, especially those that might have counted overvotes, in which a voter marked more than one choice for president, Gore would have prevailed. per Bet--"

Bet--do you read what you posted?

Overvotes on CHAD BALLOTS are null and void.

You can not be serious to be able to determine the INTENT of the voter is such a situation.

-------------

As for the ballots counted twice--google the reasons why Coleman is contesting the election.

America is NOT at it's knees!

Are you --never mind.

Later gators...

I think I can speak for about 4/5ths of the population when I say, "thanks a lot asshole".

#118 | Posted by BetelG

Keep the change.

As for the ballots counted twice--google the reasons why Coleman is contesting the election.

#121 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-01-06 10:46 PM | Reply | Flag:

So, Coleman is going to go beyond the unanimous bipartisan canvassing board and litigate his way to victory?

How Republican.

W is God-
Thanks, asshole, for doing your small part to giving the US the Worst. President. Ever.

Boyd, out of 8 fucking years, pick a month. That way we can all follow along.

W is God-
Say it. Say, "I voted for Bush twice".

I double-dog dare you.

Thanks, asshole, for doing your small part to giving the US the Worst. President. Ever.

Get a new schtick, boyd. That one is run into the ground.

I remember the first time I exchanged words with you on this blog (you were cooper then, I think) this was you mantra.

It's really old and tired

Goatman-
W is God won't say it, and it will only be "tired" when Bush is out of office. Then it'll just be for sport.

Then it'll just be for sport.

As my mom used to say: Simple things for simple minds.

Have a great time at your 'sport' boyd.

I'm good and tired of the "accountability Presidency" that isn't accountable for jack shit. Same goes for the voters who put them there and won't admit it.

As my mom used to say: Simple things for simple minds.

You elected him; seems your mom was being prescient.

I'm good and tired of the "accountability Presidency" that isn't accountable for jack shit. Same goes for the voters who put them there and won't admit it.

Good for you, boyd.

You know, there's a big, wide world out there that is full of joy and excitement that doesn't require you to take a hatred of Bush to the grave with you.

Check it out sometime. You may be surprised and actually find a sport more exciting than asking anonymous bloggers if they are pleased they voted for Bush twice. I know, I know, hard for you to believe, but it could happen. You'll never know until you try.

Get a new schtick, boyd. That one is run into the ground.

Maybe I can just go on the lecture circuit and "fill the old coffers", or maybe, I dunno....help lepers or something...that really intrigues me.

You elected him;

*sigh*

You should've taken notes one of the dozens of times that you asked me about my voting choices in 2000 and 2008

Goatman:
"You may be surprised and actually find a sport more exciting than asking anonymous bloggers if they are pleased they voted for Bush twice."

You and "W is God" might find a sport more exciting than being on the same blog and avoiding the question at all cost.

How about basket weaving?

Goat-
I've heard you. W is God is oddly silent.

You and "W is God" might find a sport more exciting than being on the same blog and avoiding the question at all cost.

What question?

First, Mr. Bush said, "I'll give some speeches, just to replenish the ol' coffers." With assets that have been estimated as high as nearly $21 million, Mr. Bush added, "I don't know what my dad gets - it's more than 50-75" thousand dollars a speech, and "Clinton's making a lot of money."

....

GIBSON: Is there one more deal in you? Is there one more thing you really want to achieve?

BUSH: That's an interesting question. I'm confident -- look, first of all, you don't get to be President unless you're a "Type A" personality who's driven to do things. And I am confident I'll be driven to do something; I just can't tell you what it is yet.

Steve Hadley and I were sitting around -- he's the National Security Advisor -- sitting around; I said, wouldn't it be interesting for baby boomers not to retire in nice places, but to retire -- during their retirement, go help people deal with malaria or AIDS. In other words -- and I'm not suggesting that's what I'm going to do, but it is the kind of thing that intrigues me.

Why "W is God" voted for this moron, for one.

Why "W is God" voted for this moron, for one.

Maybe he doesn't feel like being your puppet tonight dancing to your string of endless and childish questions. Maybe he's probably answered already anyway. I know you keep asking me the same questions over and over. One can take only so much childishness, boyd before they just call it a night.

(BTW, Goatman, I don't "hate" Bush. Ultimately, we get the leaders we deserve. Aside from that, I would have to respect him to feel anything so personal as hate.)

You're a child!
You're a liar!

-Goatman

Goatman-
re:Maybe he doesn't feel like being your puppet tonight dancing to your string of endless and childish questions.

Maybe he won't answer because he posts under the name "W is God", and yet is too ashamed to admit that he put this SOB and his party in charge - twice, while accusing the rest of us of something akin to treason.

You're a child!
You're a liar!

And your next post is:

"quit attacking me!", right? LOL

BETELG

"WISGOD" actually stands for "Wisconsin God".

Maybe he won't answer because he posts under the name "W is God"...

I've heard him say many times that since he is from Wisconsin, it stood for Wisconsin God, not W is God.

I guess you must've missed that.

Goatshit- What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

How many rivalries are you gonna flame the board with tonight, loser?

Betel, alex, bob, moneywar, dethspud, hans, dave, phoenix, nullifidian, zatoichi...

I guess it depends on who logs on, doesn't it?

Oh, and I forgot larry. Sorry, larry.

np Alexandrite. Sometimes I forget Myself too at Grocery Stores.

Larry

Ha. I didn't even know you were on, larry.

Hows the weight loss going?

Goatshit

I have a problem with your lack of reading comprehension, and your eagerness to attack me

Goatman-
I've heard his explanation. "W is God" can't have two meanings anymore, since Bush is such a loser. I'm sure "W is God" thought his moniker clever several years ago. (before he wouldn't admit voting for the moron)

Goatman- You spent three hours ignoring most of my posts and did nothing but attack me. You trolled me, tonight I'm going to do the same to you.

A normal person might get it after a while. A normal person might be given pause by the fact that 10-11 regulars on here have little to no respect for him.

But you won't get it. Still going to enjoy fucking with you, though...because you're an asshole.

"LOL"

How many rivalries are you gonna flame the board with tonight, loser?

I have a problem with your lack of reading comprehension, and your eagerness to attack me

LOL Physician, heal thyself

Hillbillydelux makes 12 posters. Thanks for the reminder, goat.

"Betel, alex, bob, moneywar, dethspud, hans, dave, phoenix, nullifidian, zatoichi..."

Now that's strange. Not one of Non-Partisan Goatman's antagonists is a rightwinger.

I'm stuck Alexandrite. Not losing but not gaining either. I think I will do better when spring and summer gets here so I can sweat more of it off. Frustrating really. Thanks for asking.

Larry

You spent three hours ignoring most of my posts and did nothing but attack me.

LOL Go to this link from early this morning. Look how many names you called me. Look at how many I called you (it was zero). Look how many times you attacked where I live. Look how many times I attacked where you live (it was zero) and in fact complimented where you live (once) and explain the your statement here.

Here's the link:

let's play the hans game, goat...

They're not as much fun, 'cause they don't get in such a hissy.

"Fuck off."

See what I mean?

#78 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 03:25 AM | Reply | Flag:

And when you repeat 20 more times in your own special hysterical manner, it'll still suck. So stay away and you'll be OK.

Geez.

#130 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 04:07 AM | Reply | Flag:
Grow up, dude. Quit playing the "your state sucks. Neener, neener, neener" game. It's rather childish.

#145 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 04:21 AM | Reply | Flag:

Grow the fuck up, dude and quite being so shrill

#156 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 04:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

As I said -- grow up.

#157 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 04:34 AM | Reply | Flag:

Grow up already

#160 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 04:39 AM | Reply | Flag:

You actually fell for Alex's lie!?!

Look back at the posts. He did all the name calling. All the insulting of my state. I called him none.

#178 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 05:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Liar.

Here's more:

IOW, quit whining and save the faux indignation, alex.

#70 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 03:19 AM | Reply | Flag:

There are bigger problems than going bankrupt and have to go groveling at the feet of that mean, evil Bush for a handout?

#51 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 03:05 AM | Reply | Flag:

You actually fell for Alex's lie!?!

Look back at the posts. He did all the name calling. All the insulting of my state. I called him none. I complimented his state and made no insults about it.

Are you just stupid or such an incredible hack that you knee-jerkingly make up lies about me whenever you see my name?

In-fucking-cridible, moneywar. Really! Why are you such a mindless shill for alex that you have to lie?

#178 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 05:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Liar.

Nice try, alex -- but calling someone a name requires using a conjugation of the infinitive 'to be'. As in "you are a jerk" "you are an asshole" (just a couple of the ones you called me.) If you want to call inferences name calling, then go back and do a tally and add yours to the actual names you called me. See who is far ahead of the other, then come back to me and whine about how I attacked you. If you want to get your numbers really up there, add the times you attacked where I live.

I'm not playing your silly games tonight, alex.

This is the last post I'm going to address to you. Good riddance drama queen.

#172 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-01-06 05:10 AM |

You are a child

(yes, that was a name calling event) A couple of dozen more and I'll catch up to you.)

Goat- Look how many names you called me. Look at how many I called you (it was zero). Look how many times you attacked where I live. Look how many times I attacked where you live (it was zero)

You just got caught lying again. Not only where you constantly telling me to "grow up" and calling me "hysterical"(as I pasted here) one of your opening salvos on me when i was talking to PINCHE about fixing texas before he wishes literal death on the citizens of California, was THIS:

There are bigger problems than going bankrupt and have to go groveling at the feet of that mean, evil Bush for a handout?

#51 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 03:05 AM | Reply | Flag:

Busted again.

The whole reason Pinche and I got in the texas argument was because he literally wished for an earthquake to kill everyone there because of their ideology. He also literally said they shouldn't be treated as americans until they acted like americans.

I merely pointed out that his state wasn't so gosh darn wonderful, and statitstically speaking, california was better on most every way possible.

But then goatman came in, insulted michigan, and started trolling me. Then he 'asked' about the links I dropped, then told me he didn't care about any of it after WASTING MY TIME for several hours.

Now you've been caught lying again. WOB.

Liar.

#161 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-01-06 11:50 PM |

Sorry, Alex, I did not realize that you and runnysore were the same person. I guess I did call you names after all.

What a fucking bending of the situation alex. You really are desperate, aren't you? I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this on this blog. It would be humorous if not so pathetically sad.

buh, bye.

Nice try, alex -- but calling someone a name requires using a conjugation of the infinitive 'to be'. As in "you are a jerk

Bullshit, little rules lawyer.

Telling someone to "grow up" means you're calling them a child. Semantics won't save you tonight.
You lied. Repeatedly. Right here on this thread. Then you linked to it, which was really really stupid.

How does it feel to be trolled? Sucks doesn't it? I bet there's a conversation you wish you could be having with someone else right now, filled with intelligent debate.

Welcome to your world, goatman.

BTW, I'll check back and see if you can come up with a single name I called you. That means it'll start with something like, "you are a_______".

Good luck! LOL

Since that obviously won't work, have a great time bending and twisting the english language until you are able to squeeze something out that vaguely supports your lies.

Good luck again! LOL

What a fucking bending of the situation alex.

You're the guy that constantly calls everyone a liar, dude. Now you've been caught doing it, and I've ruined your conversation as you've ruined so many others.

Enjoy.

"You are a child"

That's one of your favorites. "Shrill" is another; it's a new word to you, but conveys the same meaning as "child": Anyone who disagrees with you and gives a flying fuck about something substantive.

Someone who watches too much TV knows that such people are naive, and haven't hardened themselves out of their humanity, as a good citizen or reliable pundit should. In that sense, you are the coveted "moderate" that we all aspire to, Goatman.

BTW, I'll check back and see if you can come up with a single name I called you. That means it'll start with something like, "you are a_______".

Like this?

You are a child

(yes, that was a name calling event) A couple of dozen more and I'll catch up to you.)

#162 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 11:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

LOL

Since that obviously won't work, have a great time bending and twisting the english language until you are able to squeeze something out that vaguely supports your lies.

oh? You mean like this?

Nice try, alex -- but calling someone a name requires using a conjugation of the infinitive 'to be'. As in "you are a jerk" "you are an asshole" (just a couple of the ones you called me.)
#162 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 11:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

Now you're really doing a toilet spiral.

But you won't get it. Still going to enjoy fucking with you, though...because you're an asshole....

Nice try, alex -- but calling someone a name requires using a conjugation of the infinitive 'to be'. As in "you are a jerk" "you are an asshole" (just a couple of the ones you called me.)
#162 | Posted by goatman at 2009-01-06 11:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

If this isn't so much poppycock it's not even funny. You think You need to add all that bullshit to call someone a name as in You're a Jerk. You're an asshole?? Get real Goatman. Do You go You're a jerk when You get cutoff in traffic?? No not usually. We normally go Jerk. Asshole MoFo SOB etc etc Yet You just called them a name without all that fancy shmacy balderdash.

Larry

CC- He ran off in a Hissy tonight. (not an insult, didn't conjugate the infinitive 'to be')

He'll wait until he knows I'm gone to get in the last word. Then claim i'm reading it. I hope he enjoyed my imitation of his annoying ass and he figures out why so many here can't stand him.

OK, Alex. Let's end this pissing contest and get down to facts. OK? That's what we all want is the truth, right?

So here's the challenge: We'll go to the thread in which you accused me of attacking you. I'll count all the times you called me names and attacked me and my home. We'll include inferences as in "don't be hysterical"

You do the same.

The person with the higher number of insults to the other will have to do a public apology and admit he was wrong.

Do you accept my challenge?

Moments like this we're all reminded of the tragic loss of Mr. "Lotta love in the room.." Sammy Davis, Jr.

Why, Sammy? WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!?!

Goatman...you are one of a kind...thats for sure. Too funny!

The person with the higher number of insults to the other will have to do a public apology and admit he was wrong.

Do you accept my challenge?

Posted by goatman at 2009-01-07 12:12 AM | Reply

No.

You purposefully came into that thread to dick with me. The fact that i said "you are a___" more or less times than you is irrelevant. Completely irrelevant. You even amditted to me that you did not care about the statistics or anything else after ASKING ME ABOUT THEM.

You're just trying to save face since I caught you lying tonight. Have it back, I'm done wiping my ass with it. Claim your little victory cuz i name called more than you did, even though you just lied about doing it at all.(less than 15 minutes ago in front of everyone you're attmepting to impress right now)

"good luck LOL"

Goatman-
re: "Nice try, alex -- but calling someone a name requires using a conjugation of the infinitive 'to be'."

You remind me of a jackass.

You remind me of a jackass.

Posted by BetelG at 2009-01-07 12:18 AM | Reply

betel, ouch man...that was a low blow.

I can't stand semantics troll boy, but comparing him to jackass the destructo-email pussy is just plain mean. lol

"You purposefully came into that thread to dick with me."

If so....you let him...Gameover....You should know better.

So do you accept my challenge alex? Yes or no will do.

Do you accept my challenge?

Posted by goatman at 2009-01-07 12:12 AM | Reply

No.

Of course you don't because you know as well as I do that you, by far, hurled far, far more insults at me than I at you.

But that won't stop you from whining about me, will it? LOL

I already answered. Your challenge is bullshit, and it wasn't the point.

you claimed you never insulted me or my state. You did both, then tried to weasel out of it.

I NEVER said I didn't insult you, peckerhead. And i came here, like you, to purposefully take a shit on your conversation so you'd know why people hate it when you do the same.

You lose.

"LOL"

As long as it has occurred to each of you that only you care, carry on. Otherwise, carry on.

So let's go back to the topic:

Is anyone other than the republican party happy that Nancy Pelosi kept her "job"?

I say "job" because it's only work if it's difficult or time consuming, and bending over for W. is the default position for the democratic party...so it aint difficult.

You lose.

LOL

I lost the number of insults hurled. You are right.

You whine about being attacked, when you did the majority of the attacking and you know it. LOL

So let's go back to the topic:

"And fast. I'm tired of the hypocrite spotlight shining on me"

Alex

LOL

good she has shown herself to be an excellent leader. She has shown the ability to unite both parties.

No, I "whined" about you specifically coming into a thread to attack me.

Are you done yet? Really, no one gives a shit that you lied, and no one gives a shit that I called you more names.

It was fun watching your ego flounder and weasel around your words for a while, then run off to concoct a pointless contest, but that has ceased. it's boring now.

What are your feelings about nancy pelosi?

"As long as it has occurred to each of you that only you care, carry on. Otherwise, carry on."

I was thinking the same thing, but was too lazy to say it...

Funny though, the knack Non-Partisan Goatman has for getting into flame wars. (And for some reason, always with left-of-center posters).

good she has shown herself to be an excellent leader. She has shown the ability to unite both parties.

#188 | Posted by rastaninja at 2009-01-07 12:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Well, I found one person who actually likes nancy pelosi!

Was it taking impeachment off the table that did it for you, jackass/rastaninja. Cmon, man...you claim to be a liberal. Exactly how "liberal" has nancy been, um, ever?

What liberal victory did nancy pelosi ever have against W?

How about Reid?

What have either of these two do-nothings ever accomplished for their party or the country? (besides re-election)

Really, no one gives a shit that you lied, and no one gives a shit that I called you more names.

(he says hoping like hell someone other than himself believes it)

Maybe, maybe not. But if the roles were reversed, you'd be all over it like stink on shit.

I wanna see a couple good "Jane, you ignorant slut" comments!

Except betel and nulli just said they don't give a shit.

Are you done yet goatman?

Still, as much as Goatman can drive y'all nuts, you gotta admit he always ends up
getting in the last laugh and keeps coming back for more.

Translation: He's an off-topic rightwing troll who's obsessed with getting the last word in and lib-bashing and of course his own vainglorious self.

"WISGOD" actually stands for "Wisconsin God".

#146 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Is that wot he's trying to claim these days?

Bwa hahahahahahaha!

And you actually believed him, AU?

For shame.

The original intent was W is God and if he's claiming any different these days it either because he finally realises what a disaster Bush has been for America and the world or he's simply trying to play people.

Based on his previous postage smart money's on the latter interpretation.

Be Well.

Alexandrite-
Did you notice that notification of the likely Panetta appointment seems to have skipped the attention of Pelosi.

Strange, for an incoming administration that doesn't make mistakes lightly, though I can't imagine how Obama could be upset with the brave senate Democrat leadership over the last eight years...

And you actually believed him, AU?

For shame.

OK, I'm the ignorant slut! LOL

LOL. Betel- a bunch of pro torture demoshits are against panetta right from the get go. Makes me warm inside.
Maybe Obama will change the direction of this country in terms of how we treat detainees and our "fuck you" foreign policy. Maybe not.

Too bad he can't fire reid and pelosi on the 21st.

Alexandrite-
He just sent them a message, and I was glad to hear it.

Well, the hall is rented and the music is playing, betel.

Now we get to see how well Obama can dance. I hope to god he doesn't have two right feet like the last guy.

We'll see. I'm more optimistic than I have been in a long while, but we'll see.

Well, I found one person who actually likes nancy pelosi!

Was it taking impeachment off the table that did it for you, jackass/rastaninja. Cmon, man...you claim to be a liberal. Exactly how "liberal" has nancy been, um, ever?

#191 | Posted by Alexandrite

Being from Norcal I can say she has been an excellent congresswoman for the district. she has served her constituency with honor. she took impeachment off the table because she knew it probably would just stall progress in other areas. If you haven't noticed under her leadership the house grew by 20 seats and she helped Obama get elected. So obviously she has helped instill confidence in Dems Nationwide.

Are you done yet goatman?

Well, I would be if you could explain this little whine fest here . . .

I have a problem with your lack of reading comprehension, and your eagerness to attack me...

#163 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2009-01-06 04:45 AM |

. . .when even a casual glance at that thread indicates that you, by far, did the most attacking.

But you'll never be honest enough to explain this so to answer your question, I reckon I'm through.

Rasta-
Impeachment was one thing, and probably a pipe dream. Rolling over for everything Bush wanted for eight years is another matter.

I see goatman isn't done.

Already explained it. You attacked, I defended myself by attacking back.

Are we done yet?

Name one area where Pelosi, even with the majority in the last two years, successfully opposed the
Wwhite House in any substantive way. Add Reid to it, if you wish, and give me an example of leadership.

(W White House)

Rolling over for everything Bush wanted for eight years is another matter.

#206 | Posted by BetelG at 2009-01-07 01:09 AM | Reply | Flag:

yeah, exactly.

I love how reid and pelosi just gave up on any sort of filibuster. "oh, well it wouldn't work, so forget it." Tough shit. The only sure way to lose is to quit before the game begins. Reid and Pelosi did that A LOT. FISA, Torture, iraq war funding, name something...

and 9 time out of 10 they whipped out the astroglide and bent over for bush. Democrats didn't win by being republican-lite.(hence their losses in 2002 and 2004) They won by running people who weren't ashamed of being democrats in 2008.

They only won in 2006 because they were pepsi to bush's coke, And Coke had fucked the football so bad that a puddle of vomit would have won in 2006.

2006 was a repudiation of Bush. 2008 was half that, and half democrats standing up for themselves again.(reid and pelosi excluded)

I can't think of much in the last 2 years but she spearheaded the effort to block Bush from privatizing SS. So if she never accomplishes another thing her legacy is solidified.

but she spearheaded the effort to block Bush from privatizing SS.

Which had almost absolute zero public acceptance. Not exactly a hard politcal choice there, but I applaud you for finding something positive she contributed to.

Had we privatized SS, a lot of seniors would be eating from trash cans right now.

of course McCain was all for Privatizing SS. The market took his legs out on that one.

Already explained it. You attacked, I defended myself by attacking back.

So IOW, you don't see any hypocrisy in whining about me of attacking you when you indeed did it far, far more than I?

In fact, looking back over that thread, the first attack between you and me occured at 3:09 on post #53. I had not said anything negative to you (directly or inferred) before that time.

So again, explain how I attacked and you defended yourself when you indeed threw the first blow?

Here, I'll make it easy for you. It's at the very bottom of the post. (I'm not talking about the list)

Oh, jesus christ goatman.

Shut the fuck up already. I gave you an out earlier, I said let it go AND no one gives a shit.

Have the last word, please...and then knock it off already.

Seriously, if everything I wrote already didn't get the point across, and you still wish to nitpick, there's nothing I can say that will change your mind.

Leave it alone.

Reid said this which made me a fan:

Reid made another personal attack on Bush at Del Sol High School in Nevada on May 6, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal:

Reid, May 6: The man's father is a wonderful human being. I think this guy is a loser.

Later, in an interview with Rolling Stone from June 2, Reid confirmed that he had called Bush both a "liar" and a "loser":

Q: You've called Bush a loser.

Reid: And a liar.

Q: You've apologized for the loser comment.

Reid: But never for the liar, have I.

Seriously, if everything I wrote already didn't get the point across, and you still wish to nitpick, there's nothing I can say that will change your mind.

To me, honesty is not a nitpicking thing. You accused me of attacking you when the facts on the link clearly show you attacked me first and far, far more many times.

What's wrong with being honest about the event, alex?

I gave you an out earlier, I said let it go AND no one gives a shit.

We all know why they don't, don't we? Because they are all lefties like you. We know they have all been to that link by now and have seen it. If anything I said I was wrong there would be a dozen of them pointing it out to me right now (null would've been the first) But they all see that you did indeed throw the first blow. The do see that you indeed attacked far more. But not wanting to defend me, and knowing they can't defend you, they sit quietly in the shadows.

But you call that "no one gives a shit" LOL

"Oh, jesus christ goatman.

Shut the fuck up already. I gave you an out earlier, I said let it go AND no one gives a shit.

Have the last word, please...and then knock it off already."

Goatman will...always...have the last word.

Yeah, I'm through. That is unless you come up with more whiney lies.

G'night. Sleep well.

Goatman will...always...have the last word.

And null will ....never....admit I am right.

Not that I care much for Pelosi, but I do LOVE the way she pisses of the neo-cons, and for that I say 'Way to go Pelosi'!

Not that I care much for Pelosi, but I do LOVE the way she pisses of the neo-cons, and for that I say 'Way to go Pelosi'!

The main problem in the country today is the lack of bipartisianship in the government. So it is really disheartening to see people cheer this kind of counterproductive behavior on.

I voted for Bush 4 times.

Seriously?

How stupid is the American public?

Do you really need to ask this question? For the most part, most Americans seem to just barely remember to breath on a regular basis.

Being from Norcal I can say she has been an excellent congresswoman for the district. she has served her constituency with honor. she took impeachment off the table because she knew it probably would just stall progress in other areas. If you haven't noticed under her leadership the house grew by 20 seats and she helped Obama get elected. So obviously she has helped instill confidence in Dems Nationwide.

I'm glad she got more dumbocrats into Congress. Now they have no one but themselves to blame for the shit storm that is coming to America.

Too bad her and Reid sat back and watched the Economy implode over the past 2 years. Maybe they should have taken some time off from campaigning to actually do their fucking job. Take a quick peek at the Constitution and how our government works. Congress holds the purse strings not the White House.

i hate this lady, she is the biggest loser in congress..

at least spud agrees with me. or at least is willing to agree with me.

It's becoming a pattern here that if you don't give full support to whatever your party does, you're labeled as being a member of the other side. that just isn't the case. it's like saying you're un-american for criticizing the government.

I understand that this actually is the job of some posters here, to support the democratic party no matter what they do. spin control. I get it.

#8 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2009-01-06 06:48 PM | Reply | Flag

It blows my mind. This is the very first time I have ever seen Spud say ANYTHING against the Democrat party line.

"i hate this lady, she is the biggest loser in congress.."

Harry Reed....

i hate this lady, she is the biggest loser in congress..

#227 | Posted by kc101 at 2009-01-07 01:12 PM | Reply | Flag:

If, by 'Loser' you mean Speaker of the House and winning her re-election bid, then Yes, I would agree.