Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, December 15, 2008

The Supreme Court has turned down another challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president because of his citizenship, denying without comment an appeal by Cort Wrotnowski of Greenwich, Conn. Wrotnowski argued that Obama was a British subject at birth and thus does not meet the requirements for becoming president.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

sanantoniorogue

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Oh man... this was gonna be the day. Minutes before the Electoral College votes to make Obama the next President of the United States, the Supreme Court would swoop in and rescue America from the radical Christian Muslim Arab Kenyan Indonesian usurper.

Curses, foiled again!

Hail to the Chief baby!

Actually the above should have been radical Christian Muslim Arab British Kenyan Indonesian usurper to be completely accurate.

Yeah, well...that's just 'cause ol' Obama's got the entire Supreme Court in his back pocket.

He's like some sort of Svenjolly.

Svenjolly

Ho,ho,ho!

What is relly troubling about this whole matter is not the qualiftcation of Obama for the Presidency, or anyone else for that matter. It is that the SCOTUS and numerous inferior courts have found that no one has the status to challenge eligibility. The courts have not ruled on the substance of the allegations, just denied any person or entity the power to secure a judicial determination of the facts.

Regardless of which outcome you champion, think about that aspect of the matter. It really is chilling.

Tiny Lil Johnson,

That cannot be ascertained by reading this article, if you have something, such as a URL that supports what you're saying please be so kind as to produce it. Otherwise, just shut the fuck up.

The SCOTUS is probably so embarassed about the appalling move they made in Gore v. Bush that they don't want fingers anywhere near this.

Lightfoot case Toast
Donofrio case Toast
Berg case Toast
Wrotnowski case Toast

hey, what do you Birthers want on your Toast, butter, jam, or chicken shit?

the Electoral College voted today, it's official, he is the next president. The largest audience ever will watch his Inaguaration, he has 78% approval ratings the Birthers just shit in their pants. Now they have to go back to being marginal folks, how sad.

first they said "Supreme Court" will save the day now they say "Supreme Court in on it", then they said military won't obey a usurper then Gen Jim Jones signed on and vowed alligence to Obama and America, oh my, what a web the deluded Birthers weave!

by the way these cases never stood a chance, their primary purpose was as a ploy to raise funds among the wingnuts, and many donated, suggest they get a refund!

The SCOTUS is probably so embarassed about the appalling move they made in Gore v. Bush that they don't want fingers anywhere near this.

#6 | Posted by Reagan58

ff

Cort Wrotnowski

That's a name that makes "Barak Obama' seem commonplace. But in this case, its the court that's rotting him now.

for those interested in seeing Supreme Court Dockets
go to Supreme Court Web Site

http:// origin.www.supremecourtus.gov

click on "Dockets"
on Docket screen type in one of the following names in turn:
Lightfoot
Donofrio
Berg
Wrotnowski

please note the liberal use of the word "denied"
on each case, also take notice of respondents lawyers for each case(very interesting but suggest wingnuts don't look, too sad)

sorry that link was:
origin.www.supremecourtus.gov

Where there is smoke there is fire.

but no smoke...dang!

better chance with the Sinclair stuff...mossad's future blackmail material:>)

Then you must have a fire ozzieoswald, because you sound like you've been "smoking".

god damn this "he wasnt born In America" shit is as fucking ignorant as bannig smoking in bars. Its fucking common sense people. A Child born to a American while overseas is still a natural citizen of the US of A with all the goodies and bells and whistles that comes with it. Unless I am missing something......

Banning*

VMA224: Can you tell me if FLOP EARS half brother, you know the one that lives in a shack and shits outside. Is he coming to the inauguration?

"VMA224: Can you tell me if FLOP EARS half brother, you know the one that lives in a shack and shits outside. Is he coming to the inauguration?"

yes he was invited, also he has been given the task of finding you and kicking your ass! That's what you do with assholes!

I hope Obama is getting as big a laugh out of this as we are

I've always been suspicious of Barry's British accent.

probably ~ Cricket2

more worried about losing a new Chief of staff, too

"Cort Wrotnowski"

Cort klaatu barada nikto.

Hans

I heard he pronounces it Shi-SHEFF-ski.

It is suspicious that Flop Ears grandmother died recently under mysterious cicumstances. She could have told the troth about Barry being born in Kenya.

"I've always been suspicious of Barry's British accent."

Fwthm,

What do you consider a British accent, speaking in complete sentences?

I guess this goes to show your family tree doesn't branch.

"She could have told the troth about Barry being born in Kenya."

The "troth"! Well, there you have it! Game over! The "troth" is out in the open now and there's no place to hide!!!

Of course, people with millions of dollars at their disposal, some even holding (or near) the levers of power in the federal government, people like Hillary Clinton and John McCain, couldn't pin this on President-elect Barack Hussein Obama.

But the people here, these Birthers, by golly darn, they have him nailed! No doubt whatsoever. They should make those phone calls NOW, to someone, ANYONE... before it is too late!

And after they've slayed President-elect Barack Hussein Obama they need to then turn their attention to those elusive smokestacks on the moon. No question that their certitude will prove those "real" as well.

Hans

If the Globe says its true, then it must be:>)

www.americanpatrol.com

Calm down Hans and take your medications. You know the ones that the doctor said would keep you out of that locked ward.

"You know the ones that the doctor said would keep you out of that locked ward."

#28 | Posted by Billy Bibbit at 2008-12-15 07:25 PM | Reply | Flag: Seems to have a familiar grasp of the "routine"

#28 | Posted by Billy Bibbit

FF

"It is suspicious that Flop Ears grandmother died recently under mysterious cicumstances. She could have told the troth about Barry being born in Kenya."

the troth is a very dumb creature that lives in Suessville, read Dr. Suess for more details. I believe he is related to FWTHOM!

"the troth is a very dumb creature..."

...with stars on thars.

Hans

VMA224: Can you tell me if FLOP EARS half brother, you know the one that lives in a shack and shits outside. Is he coming to the inauguration?
#17 | Posted by ozzieoswald at 2008-12-15 06:37 PM | Reply

Yes, Ozzie. He'll be there behind John Sidney "Cauliflower Face" McCain and The Deciderer's drug-addict niece.

Finally, Coast to Coast listeners can get back to twisting their panties about the upcoming alien invasion and disclosure as remote-viewed by Maj. Ed Dames!

What is relly troubling about this whole matter is not the qualiftcation of Obama for the Presidency, or anyone else for that matter. It is that the SCOTUS and numerous inferior courts have found that no one has the status to challenge eligibility. The courts have not ruled on the substance of the allegations, just denied any person or entity the power to secure a judicial determination of the facts.

Regardless of which outcome you champion, think about that aspect of the matter. It really is chilling.

#5 | Posted by Johnson

Hello ... they didn't "rule" on anything, one way or the other. They just declined to hear the case, without comment.

Yer slippin' there Johnson, old bean.

Where there is smoke there is fire.

#12 | Posted by ozzieoswald

What smoke would that be Oozie? C'mon boy dunder, give us your always informative and enlightening dissertation on the topic.

Oh wait, your ability to converse on the topic pretty much ends after "flop ears", doesn't it?

Hello ... they didn't "rule" on anything, one way or the other. They just declined to hear the case, without comment.

Yer slippin' there Johnson, old bean.

#35 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

On the contrary SanAntonioRogue you're the one who's slipping that's what Johnson said:

The courts have not ruled on the substance of the allegations

"On the contrary SanAntonioRogue you're the one who's slipping that's what Johnson said:"

Nope, read what he posted again.

"The courts have not ruled on the substance of the allegations"
did you say this hoping for some magic story to happen? I know wingnuts are saying this and clicking their heals together (all to no vail)

no ruling was issued, see for yourself
origin.www.supremecourtus.gov

read slowly the following:
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A469) denied by the Court.

now tell us was does "Denied" mean for the following cases
Lightfoot
Donofrio
Berg
Wortnowski

Nope, read what he posted again.

#38 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue

If you are referring to this:

It is that the SCOTUS and numerous inferior courts have found that no one has the status to challenge eligibility.

He's right there too but you still slipped cause you said:

they didn't "rule" on anything, one way or the other.

Your comment insinuated that Johnson had said the court ruled on the subject when he pointed out they hadn't and he was right as your attempt to refute him proved.

Strange thing about World Net Daily, Home of the Birthers, World Net Daily has been in the forefront of this BC issue. But what about WND stating

"A separate WND investigation into Obama's birth certificate utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren't originally there"

shortly after publishing this, it was deleted from their main pages. However they did archive it, here is a link to the archived article
www.worldnetdaily.com

They seem to be excited about this case being denied, and now they want everyone to sign their petition demanding to see proof of Obama's citizenship. Once you sign it, they contact you and ask you to send them $10.00 or more so they can fax it to Washington D.C. What a great racket!

Don't let ethics stand in the way of a good fund raiser! Good Christian Ethics, don't you think!

No Gimme - the SCOTUS did not make any finding. They simply did not take the case(s), without comment either way.

Be as contrary as you wish and try to make it seem like something different, but Johnson's assessment was incorrect.

SanAntonioRogue you originally said they didn't "rule" on anything and Johnson said The courts have not ruled on the substance of the allegations, I'm trying to figure out why you're trying to be "contrary". Your rebuttal SCOTUS did not make any finding is what Johnson said [SCOTUS] found that no one has the status to challenge eligibility. I think you're trying to make a nitpicking play on the wording of your statement vs. Johnson's for the stake of an argument just because you don't like Johnson.

"...is what Johnson said [SCOTUS] found that no one has the status to challenge eligibility."

That is not a correct statement. They did not make ANY finding at all. They did not speak to the issue... period. How much clearer does it need to be?

By declining to hear the case(s) the SCOTUS in effect did make a ruling (or finding). Whether that ruling was that the complaint was without merit or that as Johnson states "that no one has the status to challenge eligibility" is the only thing open to debate. Now don't you try and get all lawyerly on me SanAntonioRogue.

They haven't been the same since Dianna Ross left the group

By declining to hear the case(s) the SCOTUS in effect did make a ruling (or finding). Whether that ruling was that the complaint was without merit or that as Johnson states "that no one has the status to challenge eligibility" is the only thing open to debate. Now don't you try and get all lawyerly on me SanAntonioRogue.

#45 | Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch

Last try.

When the SCOTUS declines to take a case without comment they are not making a finding or a ruling. In order to do so they would have had to take the case, then rule it was without merit, or that the complainant didn't have status.

In only 1 of the cases did a lower court rulings say the complainant didn't have status. In the others the lower courts ruled them without merit.

The SCOTUS did not speak to the cases, nor to the lower rulings. They just declined to hear them.

Scrolling quickly thru the responses this is the 2nd time you've said the SCOTUS did not make a ruling which was my original point that Johnson also said that the SCOTUS did not make a ruling. Come on swallow your pride and admit that you agree with Johnson on this point SanAntonioRogue. I certainly don't expect a highly trained legal expert like yourself to agree with a lowly lay person like myself about the points I was trying to make myself but you did agree with Johnson that the SCOTUS did not make a ruling. Go ahead swallow!

Oh man... this was gonna be the day. Minutes before the Electoral College votes to make Obama the next President of the United States, the Supreme Court would swoop in and rescue America from the radical Christian Muslim Arab Kenyan Indonesian usurper.

Curses, foiled again!

Hail to the Chief baby!

#1 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue at

AH YOU CRAZY sumbitch....thats funny

and why cant we still question this??>?
afraid of what the answer might be

I mean as jonah goldberg said the other day

the media investigated every follicle and fiber in sara's background and at the same time treated obama's chicago like a fairy tale land...

so why not??

of course once its settled and I understand it has been..........let it go and concentrate on making his new name

ONENDONE

I love that gracious loser spirit we see in Americans today, don't you?

For christ's sake just let it go already.

"I mean as jonah goldberg said the other day

the media investigated every follicle and fiber in sara's background and at the same time treated obama's chicago like a fairy tale land.

#49 | Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-12-16 12:02 PM"

Jonah Goldberg is a delushional liar. BTW still waiting for that link over on the shoe tosser thread.

Unless I am missing something......

#15 | Posted by GotTruth

You're missing something. Both parents would have to be American citizens for the baby to be considered American if born outside of America. Also, there is a time period for how long the mother had lived in the US. I think it's 5 years. Regardless, if Obama was born in Kenya, like so many are saying, then he would not be an American citizen.

but Obama was born in Honolulu...end of story?:>)

EVERLONG

Even if someone were to believe the internet rumors (as you do) Obama was born in Kenya, the fact his mother is a U.S. Citizen automatically makes him a U.S. citizen.

Anyone who's ever studied citizenship in 6th grade knows that.

"wingnuts" "clicking their heals"
first wingnuts then heals deserves a funny flag!

"Wrotnowski argued that Obama was a British subject at birth and thus does not meet the requirements for becoming president."

OH? Now he's English? Who knew!

Allo Guv'nor!

It is suspicious that Flop Ears grandmother died recently under mysterious cicumstances. She could have told the troth about Barry being born in Kenya.

#24 | Posted by fwthom at 2008-12-15 07:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

You truly are nothing more than the 'scunge' that builds up in the corners of neglected public restroom floors.

Keep trying Rightards!

Just remember one little thing, like it or not:

PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!!

the Hawaiian Republican official that confirmed Obama's BC needs to bought up on charges as well as the McCain supporting Republican Governor of Hawaii, they like the Supreme Court are in on the cover up, and so is Republican Marine Commandant Gen Jim Jones who swore allegiance to America & Obama as did Gates. This is a wide conspiracy to hide that Obama was born on Krypton. What a web Jor-al and his son have weaved. They have paid off all with Krypton Gold (it's green) and the Supreme Court either couldn't catch it or were also paid off. The mainstream media is in on the cover up, just ask FWTHOM. We will soon have an alien for president, and Obama will have the largest audience in history cheering him on Earth and including all in the Federated Planets, that's the good news.

"You truly are nothing more than the 'scunge' that builds up in the corners of neglected public restroom floors."

FWTHOM replies "That's Mr. Scunge to you buddy!" from his office at the "United Scunges of Planet Scunge" FWTHOM then added "just wait, I expect a promotion to asshole next month"

"ONENDONE
#49 | Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-12-16 12:02 PM"

THAT ONE, I'M DONE

FTFY ;-)!

Justice Kennedy, not known for being a liberal, has just denied Berg's case, what's up with that, so he's in on the coverup! wow, that web the Birthers weave is getting thicker, it's the power of Jor-Al's son! call the National Guard, what was that, they swore alligience to Obama too, gotta call Jesus!.

Nope, you all got it wrong.

Ask yourself this: have you ever personally seen Barack Obama? Not on TV or print or behind "bulletproof" panels, but actually in person? You do realize that the CNN hologram was the prototype for an Obama manchurian candidate takeover of the US.

Obama is quite literally an empty suit, not in the political sense, but in actuality. He just doesn't exist!

Obama is really an abstract idea, but the illuminati couldn't front the US Gov with an idea. So here comes the Hologram.

Obama wasn't born in Honolulu, he wasn't born in Kenya, he just simply wasn't born.

Get that through your skulls and reach TRUE enlightenment.

And the smokestacks on the moon are just magnetic fluctuations and random relight bouncing back from Jupiter. A trick of the eye.

Jesus and God love you.

Ask yourself this: have you ever personally seen Barack Obama?

#63 | Posted by JesusIsGod

Yes. Theory blown.

SanAntonioRogue,

Even Saddam had body doubles.

>:)

How can you have a body double when you claim there is no body?

There is an image, no actual person. Body doubles serve to fool those who meet the "man" in person.

Ask yourself this: have you ever personally seen Barack Obama?

#63 | Posted by Jesus Is Dog

Yes, 3 times in fact, although once was from about 50 yards away the other 2 were on a rope line.

#63 | Posted by Jesus Is Dog

More importantly, why is some Mexican like you thinkin' you're a canine?

Yes. Theory blown.

#64 | Posted by SanAntonioRogue at 2008-12-17 03:13 PM | Reply

Was Theory his Bodyguard?

ok, maybe I should have flagged my first post with: extremely dry sarcasm.

didn't mean to bind any panties.

reagan, your dyslexia is showing.

actually now that I think about the trinity, reagan was just being inclusive.

Jesus, God, and Dog love you.

Jesus and G-d are fine, but Dog love is illegal in this state.

whoa, I'm mexican now? I should alert my family!

well, I do love chica culo and salsa....

Anyway, back on topic.

Barry doesn't exist. I went to Occidental and his name is not in the matriculation book.

Barry doesn't exist. I went to Occidental and his name is not in the matriculation book.

#75 | Posted by JesusIsGod

Maybe because he only went there 2 years, then transferred to Columbia?

Good one, Paddy.

you matriculate during the first week and write your John Hancock in the big book.

Ben Affleck is in it, but his dumb ass dropped out to ride Matt Damon's coattails.

btw, I'm still being sarcastic about my flyin hawaiian floppy eared elitist POTUS-elect.

STOP!!!!!!

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable