Hurumph!

Thank god daddy is there to speak for him...

"...but you can slaughter the ladies of Code Pink and Mayor Gavin Newsome though."

Fuck no! The brother got the bomb. Lot's of 'em. First time in the history of the world a brother got that much firepower. Don't start no shit and there won't be any.

You bet yo ass, mutha! Don't be makin' me use this shit!

FF for Lee (again!)

Don't test Obama?

Particularily not in advanced physics or conjugating verbs in Latin.

Not his strong suits.

While Spud may be wrong about this, the more Spud thinks about it the more it seems that the globe's relief at the US not electing another bunch of corrupt pre-emptive chickenhawks will give Obama some breathing room, a grace period that McCain certainly wouldn't have recieved.

Actually, Spud thinks Obama's "honeymoon period" will last longer in the rest of the world than it will in the US due to the deliberately divisive BigMedia machine particularily the intellectually dishonest asswipes over on FOX and on reichwing radio.

Afghanistan, it should be noted, is heating up and there will certainly be trouble there in the upcoming months no matter who is POTUS.

Be Well.

The U.S has enemies?

The U.S has enemies?

#6 | Posted by Apocalypto at 2008-12-13 08:47 PM | Reply | Flag

republicans

Don't test Obama cos he might do something like say "stop that" or "please don't" or better yet call a meeting to figure out what to do.

Yea, Obama's known for his angry vengeful temperament. I mean back in the hood if another brother tried to sling crack rock on Obama's corner Obama would let that mother have it with some really big words he learned at Harvard.

#8 | Posted by buzkiller at

I've never fully understood the righties' aversion to education. . .

Nogo, the reference is to Obama's lack of experience and how intellectuals think they can lead by using theories they learned in a book.

Third world dictators laugh as dumbasses like Obama who don't understand how to handle the real world.

The fact is republicans as a whole are more educated than democrats so its seems your kind has an aversion to education.

I guess the real difference is that republicans usually get a job after college and democrats try to be professors, union reps, or get elected to office. They usually have no real world experience.

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton are just a few of the kind I am speaking about.

"The fact is republicans as a whole are more educated than democrats so its seems your kind has an aversion to education."

And yet when it comes down to elections, more college-educated voters vote Democrat while those with less education vote Republican.

More things that make you go hmmmmm.

I've never fully understood the righties' aversion to education. . .

~Nogovnolove

Spud reckons it has to do with plethora of fundies within the political right and their literalist streak that tells them that schools of higher learning undermine such time honored concepts as the literalist interpretation of Genesis that insists that the earth is only 6,000 years old. That denies their contention that a cytoblast (or zygote) or an embryo or a fetus is a baby. That promotes homosexuals as equals, promulgates athiesm and encourages modern shock art like the infamous "Piss Christ" or "Chocolate Jesus".

The memewar between Religion and Science/Art has been going on fer a very long time now.

In Shakespeare's final play The Tempest, in the final act, Willy (behind the mask of Prospero) speaks to his audience (and to future generations) and apologises essentially for telling a story that isn't in the bible, one that rivals the bible for readership and memespace. Remember that in his day the Puritans (who went on to found America) shut down all theatres for a time due to their "blasphemous" nature.

Religion has long struggled with and against the new views of ourself and our universe given to us by science.

Just ask Galileo.

Be Well.

Well Spud, coming from the idiot who thinks Chickens are the decendents of T-Rex or that life sprang from a cesspool of chemicals, or that gays aren't mentally ill and therefore should be helped with the affliction rather than accepted I guess I can understand why you are so stupid.

The funny thing is this, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Franklin Roosevelt, Jommy Carter, and almost all the other prominent democrats you love so much all believe in God and that he created life on earth.

The funny thing is this, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Franklin Roosevelt, Jommy Carter, and almost all the other prominent democrats you love so much all believe in God and that he created life on earth.

#13 | Posted by buzkiller

In fact, I was just telling Franklin the other day that he, John, and I should get together real soon.

- Buzzy

If Barry needs help facing these terorists Cheney could stay over to help out.

Well Cheney and Bush do get the credit for keeping us safe here in America for the last 8 years.

Of course Obama can always sit down with the terrorist and try to talk some sense into them. That should work real well for him.

Lessee, it was 10 years between attacks on the WTC. According to the above "logic", Bubba kept us safe those years.

The U.S has enemies?

#6 | Posted by Apocalypto at 2008-12-13 08:47 PM | Reply | Flag

republicans

#7 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

You misspelled that, Bob. The correct answer is Repulicrats.
In-fighting and the Hatfield's vs McCoys mentality has gotten us to the bitterly divided place the monopoly sought after they nearly lost control of the machine in 1996 when Ross Perot rocked the boat. As long as we hate each other so vehemently, the fix is in. We no longer vote for who we want in office. We merely vote to defeat the "enemy" party.
Genius, don't you think?

Actually, I guess I meant 1992...1996 wasn't as close as 1992 was.

"...idiot who thinks Chickens are the decendents of T-Rex"

since this has been pretty well established and supported by scientific evidence, why did you decide to show your ignorance, is it lack of pride, or just lack of knowledge?

Killah Logic: Well Spud, coming from the idiot who thinks Chickens are the decendents of T-Rex

They are.

...or that life sprang from a cesspool of chemicals,

It did.

...or that gays aren't mentally ill and therefore should be helped with the affliction rather than accepted

Homosexuality is neither a mental illness nor an affliction.

Spud guesses he can understand why you are so stupid.

You are one of those religitards who's always believed wot you've been told without ever bothering to think things through for yourself.

Fundamentalism, the kind yer obviously afflicted with, seriously needs to be classified as a mental illness.

Unlike homosexuality, which is found in almost all aspects of nature, religious mania that prevents moral evolution or even simple humanity is an affliction found only in the species homo sapiens.

The funny thing is this, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Franklin Roosevelt, Jommy Carter, and almost all the other prominent democrats you love so much all believe in God and that he created life on earth.

Wot's so funny about that?

Spud has no problem with religous people who don't see science and religon as being mutually exclusive of each other.

Spud, likewise, has no problem with people of faith (be they Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, Zoroastrans, Hindus etc) who believe wot they believe but don't believe they have a need to proselytize their beliefs all day long or force anyone else to have the exact same beliefs.

The pride you take in your own ignorance and hate is unfathomable. It really should be the greatest source of personal shame to you.

Seek help.

Seek true enlightenment.

Seek truth.

Be Well.

Yea, Obama's known for his angry vengeful temperament. I mean back in the hood if another brother tried to sling crack rock on Obama's corner Obama would let that mother have it with some really big words he learned at Harvard.

#8 | Posted by buzkiller at 2008-12-13 09:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

You're right! Bush wouldn't say anything at all. Instead, his family wold do business with the family of the man who killed 3000 American civilians in one day!

Now that's action!!

...or perhaps Bush would break out his old cheerleader pom-poms from when he was on the cheer squad in school and recite his favorite one.

Well Cheney and Bush do get the credit for keeping us safe here in America for the last 8 years.

#16 | Posted by buzkiller at 2008-12-13 10:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

7 years. (You omitted 9/11)

I guess the real difference is that republicans usually get a job after college and democrats try to be professors, union reps, or get elected to office. They usually have no real world experience.

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton are just a few of the kind I am speaking about.

#10 | Posted by buzkiller at 2008-12-13 09:54 PM | Reply | Flag:

Dems don't get jobs?

Another ill-informed republican spouting nonsense.

You do realize that both Obama and Biden were lawyers in law firms before entering politics, right?

Kerry served as a prosecutor for the District Attorney in Massachusetts.

Al Gore worked the night shift for The Tennessean as an investigative reporter (he worked for the paper from 1971-1976).

Can you tell us what job Bush got on his own after college? By that, I mean tell us which job he got because of his own hard work and not due to family connections?

Well Cheney and Bush do get the credit for keeping us safe here in America for the last 8 years.

#16 | Posted by buzkiller at 2008-12-13 10:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

There are 3000 Americans who might disagree with that.

Spuds wrote,

"Unlike homosexuality, which is found in almost all aspects of nature, religious mania that prevents moral evolution or even simple humanity is an affliction found only in the species homo sapiens."

Spuds if homosexuality is perfectly normal then by your own logic pedophilia should also be. I mean if deviant desire for unnatural sex is O.K. then whats the difference if that person is a grown up or child. It's still sick.

Also, there is no evidence whatsoever that life sprang from a cesspool of chemicals. Evidence isn't important in the faith of evolution.

Every time someone refutes evolution its funny how the believers go on and on about religion to try and attack the person who refutes them. Its because they can't argue the science since there is so little of it involved in the "Theory of Evolution".

Of course facts and evidence have never been Spuds strong suit. Just silly references to movies and songs in the hope to get attention.

"Spuds if homosexuality is perfectly normal then by your own logic pedophilia should also be."

And here we have an excellent example of right wing thought. I think it explains much when someone can't differentiate between consensual sex between adults and adult assault on a child. Hopefully this disturbed person will not act out on his misunderstanding and immediately seek intervention before he does. Sick. Sick. Sick.
P.S. I do understand he is not typical or Republicans or right wingers though I also do know that he is not alone among those groups either.

I see the loser Crackpipejenkem is now posting as buzkiller. How many handles has this turd been been banned under now? BTW, nice job with the state-by-state predictions for the Presidential election.LOL

Zed, here is the list of states I figure McCain has a good shot to win. Tell me which states you think I am wrong about.

Florida
Ohio
New Jersey
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Oregon
New Hampshire
New Mexico
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Nevada

Bee Swell

Posted by Crackpipejunkie at 2008-05-10 07:57 PM

"can't argue the science since there is so little of it involved "

you could try going to any major university or there are many sites on the internet that can bring your simple little mind up to date. there is over 150 years of evidence and growing every day. but you continue to shout "no evidence" while your ears are plugged and your eyes are covered. that you refuse to see the evidence doesn't make you smart, it makes you stupid.

"Enemies" is/are/am a Republican invention to retain office. The masses just stopped believing. If we stay the hell out of other nations, we will never have an enemy. As the flushing cycle is nearly complete, I cannot believe that we still have anything anyone else might want. herm

If we stay the hell out of other nations, we will never have an enemy.

Yes, they arent called an enemy, it's called an occupation after invasion.

Yes, they arent called an enemy, it's called an occupation after invasion.

Man, I don't remember a thing before this war about an occupation. In fact, the Bush Administration 'experts' like Rummy and Wolfowitz categorically stated to Congress we'd be out of there no later than September 2003.

Are you suggesting they didn't know what they were talking about, or worse just outright lied?

VMA224 wrote,

"there is over 150 years of evidence and growing every day. but you continue to shout "no evidence" while your ears are plugged and your eyes are covered."

VMA224, which evidence are referring to?

The claim that feathers evolved from scales? Of course as usual all the evolutionary scientist who claimed this have been proven wrong.

Thats the problem with evolutionists no matter how often they are wrong they just keep moving the goal posts.

Tell us oh great braniac which came first plants or animals?

If you say plants then where did they get the carbon dioxide necessary for life from? If animals then where did they get the oxygen they need to breathe?

The fact is I have read extensively on the subject of evolution and know there is little evidence to support it. I do beleive in natural selection because there is evidence to support it.

The difference is I approached the subject with an open mind while you already had your mind made up.

Virtually every time the subject comes up here on the DR and someone questions the theory the nutcases here who see evolution as a faith start to attack mainstream religion rather than support their arguments with facts. Spud is perect example. He never discusses his suppositions he only calls those who oppose his view flat earthers, etc.

Buz-
re: The fact is I have read extensively on the subject of evolution and know there is little evidence to support it. I do beleive in natural selection because there is evidence to support it.

Would you explain the difference - in your mind - between "evolution", which you think is bunk, and "natural selection"?

The fact is I have read extensively on the subject of evolution and know there is little evidence to support it.

We can see a progression in genetic material, as well as commonality between species. This is more exacting than the taxonomic classification that formed the basis for Evolutionary Theory.

I was always told that God works in mysterious ways...and I believe our part is to discover the formula.

You don't have to believe in God to do good science, but there's too much information on evolutionary biology to ignore it based on texts that were originally part of an oral tradition, translated repeatedly, and based on subjective observation.

Your reading material obviously lacks substance. Until you learn some real science you will be ridiculed by those who actually put the effort into learning a discipline rather than browsing a few articles written for mass consumption.

Buzkiller-
don't have an answer? afraid to answer?

I believe when plants first appeared on the planet, Carbon Dioxide was the dominate compound in the atmosphere.

Would you explain the difference - in your mind - between "evolution", which you think is bunk, and "natural selection"?

Betelg- The difference I see is this. Natural selection is the effect of enviroment on any given animal or plant and the changes it causes within that species. For example, over a long amount of time horses becoming taller and faster due to natural selection as the smaller and weaker ones are killed off. As the taller ones breed with other taller ones their offspring are naturally taller as well.

Evolutionary science says that random gene mutation causes changes in species that over time turn it into completely different species. However, natural selection refutes many of the claims made in evolutionary science. For example, the claim that dinosaurs had wings and evolved into birds over millions of years. Having wings that cannot fly and would certainly cause the animal to run slower due to drag would be a hindrance to any dinosaur. Thus due to natural selection these any flightless bird dinosaur would die off due to natural selection.

Additionaly, although the fossil record for all animals is vastly incomplete the fossils that can be traced for literally millions of years show virtually no change whatsover. These include the Gar, army ants, Coelacanth, alligators, crocodiles, dragonflys, cycads, horshoe crab, laotian rock rat, sturgeon, tuatara, velvet worm, salamandar, etc.

Here, are some quotes on the subject from actual scientists!

Living Fossil Quotes

Niles Eldredge, Curator, American Museum Of Natural History, under the heading "Living Fossils", in his book, FOSSILS, 1991.
"...there seems to have been almost no change in any part we can compare between the living organism and its fossilized progenitors of the remote geological past. Living fossils embody the theme of evolutionary stability to an extreme degree. ....We have not completely solved the riddle of living to an extreme degree. ....We have not completely solved the riddle of living fossils. " p.101, 108
"...were thought to have been extinct by the end of the Middle Devonian [385 MYA]. Modern Neopilina species, however, were dredged from the deep oceans in the 1950's..." p.101
P. Arduini and G. Teruzzi cite Neopilina as an example, PREHISTORIC ATLAS, 1982.
"There are also numerous organisms, in the present day fauna and flora, which can be regarded as living fossils; one of the best known among them is Neopilina, the only living representative of a class of mollusks...thought to have been extinct for 350 million years before 1957, when Neopilina was caught off the coast of Costa Rica." , p.78
"The Gingko biloba is the sole surviving species of a very old group of gymnosperms which died out 100 million years ago." PREHISTORIC ATLAS, 1982, p.78
Keith S. Thomson, Ex. Officer, Academy of Natural Sciences. LIVING FOSSIL, 1991
"Off the coast of southern Africa, in the winter of 1938, a fishing boat called The Nerine dragged from the Indian Ocean near the Chalumna River a fish thought to be extinct for 70 million years. The fish was a coelacanth, an animal that thrived concurrently with dinosaurs..." From bookcover.
"The first members of this group appeared some 424 million years ago in the Silurian and look quite like the modern forms. The last fossils became extinct about 50 million years ago." p.72
"This species was widespread and reasonably common in the Pliocene of North America... The tree was thought to be extinct worldwide until living specimens were found in central China in 1945." p.72
Sue Rigby, British Geological Survey, Nature Vol.363, p.209, 3/18/93
"All paleontologist dream of finding a 'living fossil.' Noel Dilly, it seems has done so... As graptolites are arguably the most important zone fossils of the Lower Palaeozoic (570-360 million years before the present), this is far from an esoteric issue."

Betelg, over time science has actually show through these living fossils that evolutionary change is virtually nonexistent.

The animals that I listed above have fossils going back some 50 to 500 million years. Shouldn't they show significant change?

I believe Darwin said it best.

Where are all the intermediary species that show the change over time?

Hell Natural Selection IS Evolution really. You are taking the best qualities of a plant and or Animal and Carrying it through to the next generation and leaving the bad stuff behind. Take a gander at the way people looked 200 Years ago. They were some of the least attractive people compared to now. They selected the cream of the crop and procreated. Those who didn't measure up were left to live life alone and not have the chance to pass their seed down to the next generation. If that isn't Natural Selection/Evolving I don't know what is.

Larry

Larry, I believe what you are saying is that you watch too much tv. Most people today still look rough at best.

Yes, Botox, braces, makeup, leg braces, push up bras, etc. have done a lot to help but essentially they are the same.

BUZKILLER

You're forgetting (or perhaps didn't know) people didn't take baths nearly as often, there were no hair stylists or shampoor, dental hygiene was a huge problem, and only the well to do had a wardrobe that consisted of more than a couple of pieces of clothing.

Now I know you're pretty much ignorant of history.

I'd held out hope you're a spoofer, but instead no other conclusion can be reached but that you're hopelessly ignorant.

Americanunity wrote,

"I'd held out hope you're a spoofer, but instead no other conclusion can be reached but that you're hopelessly ignorant."

Again, insults instead of facts. If you have something serious to say about my assertions I will respond otherwise I will just have to ignore your comments as they show no true intellect.

"Again, insults instead of facts. If you have something serious to say about my assertions I will respond otherwise I will just have to ignore your comments as they show no true intellect."

Buzkiller
here are two titles one of some of Eldrege's books that I'm sure you read, correct?

The Triumph of Evolution.And the Failure of Creationism. Eldredge, N. 2000. W.H. Freeman and Co., N.Y.

also

Charles Darwin. Discovering the Tree of Life. W.W. Norton, New York. Companion volume to the Darwin exhibitionan exploration of Darwin's intellectual journey aboard the Beagle and beyond. With 100 illustrations. Eldredge, Niles. 2005.

Ignorance and Hate, the true marks of the right, want proof, listen to Rush.

Sorry Buzzy

"over a long amount of time horses becoming taller and faster due to natural selection as the smaller and weaker ones are killed off"

"random gene mutation causes changes in species that over time turn it into completely different species"

Self retorting retort. You do realize that that it is the random gene mutations that cause those horses to become taller and faster. Natural selection isn't a mechanism for change over time, it is the progression of whatever works best wins out.

I've never read something so internally conflicted as your misgivings on evolution and natural selection as the former is wholly dependent on the latter.

I am just waiting for Obama to report terrorists to the UN. The bad guys are on so much trouble.

There is even a plan to give Al Qaeda double secrete time out.

And really, no one here needs to address your assertions because your seem do be doing a damn fine job at proving yourself wrong.

I wouldn't count making it through "Everybody Poops" as extensive reading material.

I too can cherry pick bibliographies with book titles that seem to support my 'assertions'.

A troll, a boob?

God and Jesus still love you.

Buzkiller-
With all undue respect, you haven't the slightest clue as to what you're ranting about. Look to JesusisGod for a clue.

quote mining, usual practice of extreme fundies
that's where Buzzy got his quotes, he had no idea that all the people he quoted are teachers and promoters of evolution, he was lied to and is incapable of knowing that! Ignorance is bliss to these types!

Actually, Spud thinks Obama's "honeymoon period" will last longer in the rest of the world than it will in the US due to the deliberately divisive BigMedia machine particularily the intellectually dishonest asswipes over on FOX and on reichwing radio.

#5 | Posted by dethspud

I guess you listen to error amerika or msnbc.

reichwing radio and error amerika made Jesus bellow with laughter.

I love Foxnews. I used to walk by the newscorp. building everyday and laugh. Hey MsNBC how you doing over there is Secaucus, NJ ?????

BETELG your friend above wrote this

"You do realize that that it is the random gene mutations that cause those horses to become taller and faster."

This makes no sense. Random gene mutations have nothing to do with natural selection. Natural selection is the process by which favorite genetic traits win out over less favorable. Go back to junior high school and listen this time to your teacher.

Here again for you consumption:

"Traits that cause greater reproductive success of an organism are said to be selected for whereas those that reduce success are selected against."

Nothing to do with randon gene mutation!

Here is a question for all you evolution believing braniacs.

Who among you believes that the modern chicken is a direct decendent of T-Rex?

Random mutation is a part of "evolution". Primarily, existing phenotypes are selected in the natural world, but the genotype is a combination of sexual selection and random mutation.

Buz-
The word you were looking for earlier is "speciation", not "evolution", BTW.

randon gene mutation is not the catalyst for natural selection. Try reading what I wrote. You are speaking of evolution I am speaking of natural selection.

Try answering my question. Do you believe that the modern chicken is a direct decendent of the T-Rex?
Yes or no?

Who among you doesn't believe that Buzkiller's genetic ancestor was a shit-slinging primate?

Wait...he IS a shit-slinging primate. For that matter, so am I.

Answer the question BETELG. Don't you have the balls to put forth your opinion?

Hey buzkiller I usually sorta agree with a lot of your comments but take my advice and stop with the evolution, natural selection stuff you're way off base.

Buz-
Sure: Is a chicken the genetic descendant of T-Rex?

I have no idea.

Look at your hands Buz. Are you a primate?

Do you have the balls to "put forth your opinion", Buz?

Hey buzkiller I usually sorta agree with a lot of your comments but take my advice and stop with the evolution, natural selection stuff you're way off base.

#65 | Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch

I gotta agree with what he said.

Most evolutionists and many of the dopes on the DR believe the chicken is a direct decendent of the T-Rex.

So here is another question for you.

How could that be since thousands of scientists believe that Dinosaurs died off suddenly due to an asteroid impact and nuclear winter that followed?

Fossil evidence offers strong support the asteroid idea that dinosaurs perished quickly.

I guess you don't "have the balls to put forth your opinion", but I'll ask again:

Are you a primate?

This would not have allowed the millions of years that you idiots believe it takes for animals to mutate into another species.

Betelg, I am a human, a mammal, animal, etc.

I do not believe I am a direct decendent of any monkey or ape or a distant cousin either.

Most evolutionists and many of the dopes on the DR believe the chicken is a direct decendent of the T-Rex.

I can't speak for any "dopes on the DR" except myself, but "most evolutionists" (if by that you mean most evolutionary biologists or geneticists) don't "believe the chicken is a direct decendent of the T-Rex.". The key words here are "believe" and "direct decendant" (BTW, that red underline means you are misspelling a word). Some biologists do think that birds and reptiles share a common ancestor.

Buz-
So, you are a mammal, animal, etc., but you draw a line at "primate". So, you believe you share a common ancestral gene pool with rats and cows, but chimps are too smelly, or what?

Perhaps you think you were created in your present form by God himself out of clay?

I do not believe I am a direct decendent of any monkey or ape or a distant cousin either.

Alright, dude.

I didn't vote for him either, but there does come a point where we have to look forward and accept the new administration.

This nation's greatness transcends the results of any, single election.

Let's move on.

Pinche is a primate. Right, Pinche?

I don't have opposible thumbs, asshole.

Thanks for bringing it up.

If you do it again, so help me God, I'll find a way to reach through this monitor and choke you.

With a pair of channel-locks.

"I don't have opposible thumbs, asshole."

Or frontal lobes, or spell-check...

On dialup that'll take you until 2012. In the meantime those of us on cable super high speed will be 1000 miles away.

With me owning an Airbus A-380 make that 14,000 miles away

LOL

The bible is full of fairy tales and lies.

Rasta-
It's also full of wisdom, vengeance, poetry, salvation, love and tribal genocide.

Betelg, all animals share common building blocks. Thats the way God designed us.

You think otherwise thats fine but offer some facts to back up evolution or shut up.

Insults don't work with me because I know they are the desperate act of the ignorant.

Why are there so many living animals that have not evolved at all over hundreds of millions of years like the gar, sturgeon, dragonfly, army ants, etc?

Buz-
Sure. You have stated that you are an animal and a mammal, but a primate? BLASPHEMY!

re: Why are there so many living animals that have not evolved at all over hundreds of millions of years like the gar, sturgeon, dragonfly, army ants, etc?

You seem to have a really dumbass idea of evolution and natural selection. Allow me to assist, primate: a species can share a common ancestor with an extant species.For example, do you think that dragonflies are not insects, and do not share a common genetic ancestry with other insects? (But....but...but....dragonfli es still exist...how can that be?!!!)

Maybe your next statement would be: How can we have evolved from monkeys when there are still monkeys?

You've got me stumped there, LOL.

BETELG, even evolutionists do not believe we evolved from monkeys but a common ancestor. Get your ideas straight dumbass.

LOL

Do you understand that "evolutionist" includes pretty much everyone with a bachelors degree in a science?

Look at your hands, primate, and dream of being a great ape.

Adios.

People who have to use the word 'dumbass' (it's actually TWO words, not one) are definitely descended from apes.

Based on all your posts, you are descended from primates.

even evolutionists do not believe we evolved from monkeys

You're right...BECAUSE APES ARE NOT MONKEYS.
We share 99.5% of our DNA with Chimps.

100% for you, i think.

BUZKILLER

Cognitive thinking not your strong point. Knee jerk reactions the norm.

Why in the world did you misspell even your user name?

ALEX

Speaking of chimps, I just watched a heartwarming documentary on PBS about a couple of chimp sanctuaries. Many of them hadn't been out of a cage in 40 years. Others that had been pets many years ago recognized their former owners 20 years later when they were tracked down and brought around for a visit.

It's sad to think many of these chimps lived their entire lives to that point in a 4' X 4' cage in solitary confinement. Many were horribly treated during medical experiments - some even had their discs removed from their backs to test prosthetic discs. Then these labs actually REMOVED the prosthetics.

God, man can be a cruel being.