During this investigation they should find out two things:

1.) Why would anyone pay a prostitute when there is so much free pussy avaiable?

2.) If someone pays a prostitute for pussy, why does that mean they have to resign from office?

If Republican, investigate them
If Democrat, investigate those that investigate them

2.) If someone pays a prostitute for pussy, why does that mean they have to resign from office?

#1 | POSTED BY FWTHOM

David Vitter proved that axiom false.

Why would anyone pay a prostitute when there is so much free pussy avaiable?

Oh hey - Hi Danni!

There never should have been an investigation. This was a misuse of the Patriot Act.

And why is this getting play when we can't get any real investigations going into l'affaire Dubya, meaning damn near everything that's happened at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in the past eight years?

Patriot Schmatriot, Bush is toast!

why didn't he ask bill how to get some of that young intern pussy,for free.

Spitzer prosecuted others for similar quasi crimes.

Its not that he hired a prostitute, its that he's a fucking hypocrite, prepared to destroy other's lives for greed and smbition.

Imagine if Democrat Spitzer had been engaging male prostitutes? I'm sure the witch-hunt investigation into his demise would be in full swing at this moment, and those who finked on him would be in the political crosshairs of the left! Cuz when you're a Democrat, it's different!

"Imagine if..."

But, as we all know, that's not what happened.

Is it?

Typical rightoid delusional thinking.

Nope, it's not what happened....which is why they're a little slower in going after those who ratted on Spitzer.

To be sure, the left will certainly go after those evil ones who brought this to light. But they would have moved a whole lot quicker if Spitzer-boy had been hooking up with homosexuals.

Leftist Motto: The greater the deviancy, the greater the necessity to vindicate such deviancy!

It's nice to see that they have the time to investigate an investigation. I hope they enjoy the next 2 years.

The greater the deviancy, the greater the necessity to vindicate such deviancy!

#12 | Posted by TheOneBS at 2008-11-26 09:49 AM | Reply | Flag:

TheOneBallSack,

That being the case, I hereby vindicate you, FWThom, R. Zeitgeist, Tadowe and KBM 'cuz you guys are the biggest deviant freaks I've ever heard of.

FWThom, R. Zeitgeist, Tadowe and KBM 'cuz you guys are the biggest deviant freaks I've ever heard of.

That has to be a lie.

Oh, but you see fit to not include LarryMohr.

Okay.

:-(

Eberly,

I have chosen to and will continue to stay entirely off that topic. I can easily get a dump for bad DR behavior all on my own without that. It's a dog eat dog world out there.

And why is this getting play when we can't get any real investigations going into l'affaire Dubya, meaning damn near everything that's happened at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in the past eight years?
#6 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore

Because they have no intention of ever doing that so they'll distract us with this and convince us that its really important in the scheme of things.

Scheme... yeah, it will mostly be a scheme... to avoid answering any serious questions.

but who will investigate the investigators investigating the investigation?

The good Lord had to shake some Repubs to their senses and now they are contemplating and recuperating.

Some dems will be given time and then judgment will fall if they get too vindictive and drunk with temporary power.

I know Hans will keep this to rub my nose endlessly.... but just wait and give it time. If under the guise of majority and legality there is abuse of power, swift judgment will fall.

Be careful dems --- you can do certain things, but your inner voice will tell you when it is unfair and vindictive. Listen and minister with care.

I'm sure his wife will realize that there never should have been an investigation and pretend she doesn't know about it.

I'm not a Martha Stewart fan, but sometimes these "invest6igations" seem to involve a grave misuse of power. When, however, a "prosecutor," who was zealous in seeking to incarcerate others falls to the same process, well the tears seem unmerited.

Now, let's get conspiratorial. Who could have engineered this investigation of Spitzer? Who had motive to be behind the scenes, a veritable "Wizard of Oz?" Whose machinations would have had what effect, and inured to whose benefit or delight?

Well, there are the usual suspects. Wall Street malefactors, who did not want a person inclined to punish people whose activities could fall within the criminal category to be in power, or a black group that wanted a black man as Governor, or a blind group that wanted a blind man as Governor, or ... Could it possibly be that Spitzer just got snared because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and was not targeted, but was just caught participating in publicly ostracized, but privately rather common, procreative activity, and because he provided compensation to his "mate" of the moment?

Hey wait. Maybe Spitzer's wife set it up. She also would have a couple of motives. Keep her husband at home. And of course, remember how the basketball player, the Laker Kobe Bryant, got ensnared, and he had to woo his wife, bought her diamonds and the like to pacify her.

Aha! got it. Mrs. Spitzer engineered the entire scenario.

Wait until the Democrat Party "investigating committee" that seeks to do what, exonerate "the criminal" for his misconduct, finds that out. Wow!

Laughable. Spitzer screwed himself, metaphorically speaking.

1.) Why would anyone pay a prostitute when there is so much free pussy available?

#1 | Posted by fwthom at 2008-11-25 07:31 PM |

no such thing thommy.

Spitzer was a public official. He's supposed to set a standard. He got what he deserved.
That said, the Justice Department needs to be investigated. There is sufficient reason to suspect that this, once reputable, government agency has been transformed into a political hit squad. If this is true then the people responsible need to get what they deserve; prison.