Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, November 23, 2008

Candace Gingrich: Dear Newt, I recently had the displeasure of watching you bash the protestors of the Prop 8 marriage ban to Bill O'Reilly on FOX News. I must say, after years of watching you build your career by stirring up the fears and prejudices of the far right, I feel compelled to use the words of your idol, Ronald Reagan, "There you go, again."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

reinheitsgebot

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

This was a good zinger, with much left unsaid:

"You belittle the relationships of gay and lesbian couples, and yet somehow neglect to explain who anointed you the protector of "traditional" marriage. And, of course, you've also mastered taking the foolish actions of a few people and then indicting an entire population based on those mistakes. I fail to see how any of these patterns coincide with the values of "historic Christianity" you claim to champion."

Especially since Newt told his wife he was leaving her while she lay in the hospital with cancer; Leaving her for the assistant he'd been boffing for who know's how long.

If my sister did a slam job on me, I would be arrested for a sex crime. It just show what the elite upper crusters can get away with.

...In other words, stop being a hater, big bro

~Candice Gingrich

* golf clap *

Nice find, Rein.

Spud likee this gal!

She's right too.

The people who voted For Prop H8 were largely the superannuated, overly religulous crowd who's world view is informed by previous generations.

Their day is almost done.

Young folks, who have grown up in the culture wars perpetuated by the religous right, are sick and tired of all the unneccessary hate and diviseness.

They see past the right's obvious tactic of protesting that they are "protecting" traditional marriage when they are really just attacking gay marriage.

It's like their so-called "Pro" Life stance which is actually anti choice, anti woman, and anti freedom.

Along with their anti-science agenda they are really just a great big ball of negativity who are proving to be a drag on scientific, social and cultural evolution.

Tommorow is another day.

Out with the old sez Spud.

In with the new.

Be Well.

"18-24 year olds voted overwhelmingly against Prop 8 and overwhelmingly for Barack Obama."

Golly, at this rate we won't have a perfect society until 2103

"Golly, at this rate we won't have a perfect society until 2103"

And what are your calculations for the dawn of a master race, mein fuhrer?

Watching the MacLaughlin Group this AM Prop H8 was brought up.

Basically, they went back in time to 2000 when when the original anti-gay marriage Prop 22 was voted on in Californeeya.

Back then it passed about 65 percent to 35.

Flash forward to 2008.

Prop H8 passes but only by 52% to 48%.

Pat Buchanon points out that the record fer these kinda Props is 30 & 0.

John points out that the CA SCOTUS ruled the move unConstitutional 5 months ago and will prolly do so again.

Eleanor Clift points out that young people have no problem with equal rights for gays it's just the old and the religulous asswipes who do and that the future belongs to gay civil rights not to homophobic immoral shitstains.

/Spud paraphrases there.

Even Pat Buchanon cannot deny this obvious truth.

The Blonde bimbo from rightwingnut radio then tries making the assertion that it was the black voter who did the gays in here and tries to pooh pooh the religious connection.

Maybe her moronic audience are dumb enuff to buy into her deliberately divisive nonsense but nobody else on that stage was.

Be Well.

"18-24 year olds voted overwhelmingly against Prop 8 and overwhelmingly for Barack Obama."

~FTA

Golly, at this rate we won't have a perfect society until 2103

~Vermin

Who wants to volunteer to tell Vermin that a vote against Prop H8 is a vote FOR gay marriage?

Methinks he hasn't made that connection yet.

Be Well.

"If my sister did a slam job on me, I would be arrested for a sex crime. It just show what the elite upper crusters can get away with." #2 | Posted by keith204

Check out Wikipedia for her autobiography. en.wikipedia.org

OMG and HP holds her on a pedestal and gives her a soap box to rant her opinion from.

"Methinks he hasn't made that connection yet."

Methinks you misunderestimate the power of Verm's calculator.

"If my sister did a slam job on me, I would be arrested for a sex crime.
Keith204

what does this even mean?

And the Angels plotted and schemed, "Lets name this one after a reptile, turn him intolerant and mean spirited, then give him a gay sister who can kick his...Good one.

Candice gets it.
The 9th Circuit gets it too (they almost always do).
I'm confident that the 9th will over-turn
this horrible ammendment.

They don't dare annul my marriage to my husband.
THEY. DON'T. DARE.

Be Well.

"Methinks you misunderestimate the power of Verm's calculator."

vern's calculator explained.

Hans

Newts are not reptiles.

"Is a newt a salamander?

Yes, but a salamander is not always a newt. Confused? The word "salamander" is the name for an entire group, or scientific order, of amphibians that have tails as adults."

www.sandiegozoo.org

Why does anyone even pay attention what Salamander Groinitch has to say.
He's even more irrelevant and out of touch than he was in 1994/5 when Clinton ran him out of DC.

"The Blonde bimbo from rightwingnut radio" - Dethspud.

Spud - who is that piece of hairdye fluff and why the hell is she on that decent programme?

Does she get the old boy hard? He was very unenthused about Obama at every turn in the campaign.

Newt Gingrich is not a reptile. He is a big bad beast.

And he should be out to pasture.

Spud - who is that piece of hairdye fluff and why the hell is she on that decent programme?

~Sitdown.

Eye candy and a sense of balance and youth, Spud imagines but quite frankly Spud loooks at her like the Elizabeth Hasselback of the MacLauhghlin group.

She makes Pat Robertson look sane in direct comparison fer fook's sake and that's hard to do.

According to her Bio on the TMG website...

Monica holds two Masters degrees and a Ph.D. in international affairs from Columbia University and worked as a Foreign Policy Assistant to former President Richard Nixon from 1990 until his death in 1994. Crowley's experience with Nixon prompted her to write two best-selling books, Nixon off the Record: His Candid Commentary on People and Politics and Nixon in Winter

A Nixonian rethug? Say no more!

She also co-hosted a radio program with Ron Reagan apparently which Spud was unaware of.

Does she get the old boy hard?

Are you kidding. John's so old he needs to take a viagra just to piss straight.

He was very unenthused about Obama at every turn in the campaign.

Yup, Spud is all too well aware of that.

Mostly, Spud watches fer the beltway memes they've glommed onto that week, the prepdictions at the end of the show and, of course, Eleanor Clift.

EC is Spud's Gal on TMG, fer sure!

Luffs her gutsy determination to get a word in edgewise on that perrenial yell-a-thon.

She's pretty quick on her feet thinks Spud.

John did his traditional "gobble gobble" ending this week.

Wotta turkey that John is!

Be Well.

Why the heck would Nixon need a "Foreign Policy Assistant" from 1990-1994? What did she do, count the number of illegals working the taco stands in San Clemente?

Newt Gingrich Slammed by Sister

incest is best

Why the heck would Nixon need a "Foreign Policy Assistant" from 1990-1994?

Toomuch - I can only think it was to tell him how to get between Saddle River New Jersey and the Upper East Side, and avoid Henry Kissinger when he got there.

"vern's calculator explained."

FF fer Hans.

The 9th Circuit gets it too (they almost always do).
I'm confident that the 9th will over-turn
this horrible ammendment.

They don't dare annul my marriage to my husband.
THEY. DON'T. DARE.

Be Well.

#12 | Posted by skip_wellington

Skip --are your from Canada like Spud?

The amendment was a vote to change the constitution of the State of CA.

They can't overturn a state amendment. If they do --it will go to the SCOTUS. Or have anarchy on their steps.

What they are hearing is a case (or cases) of people who got married between May and November.

The question is/are those marriages recognized or valid in the state of CA after the people voted marriage is between a man and a woman?

If they read the amendment--they should only recognize valid marriages as between one man and one woman--That is how the amendment reads "valid".

But seeing the 9th Circus--they will try to overthrow the people again and like vote that the same sex weddings between May and November--have to stay recognized. Try to enfore the 14th amendment, which does not apply in this situation.

Throwing the entire thing to the SCOTUS--because the 9th Circus is not allowed to overthrow the people's vote.

So why don't the gays protest in FL or AR or AK ?? Those states this time voted to recognize man and woman marriages too? And bigger percentages than CA??

Why only bring up the youth vote?--what about the black vote, the hispanic vote and the asian vote who overwhelmingly voted to recognize a marriage as between one man and one woman?

The youth are so fickle--really. Raising kids changes people.

There is nothing wrong with traditional marriage--and folks recognize that sentiment.

Spud: Methinks he hasn't made that connection yet.

Dave: Methinks you misunderestimate the power of Verm's calculator.

Methinks Dave gets a FF fer that!

"misunderestimate" Narf!

"Against stupidity the god themselves contend in vain"

vern's calculator explained.

~Hans

FF fer Hans and Marjorie Main and Percy Killbride!

Spud luffs those movies.

/Especially the one where they go to Hawaii!

They can't overturn a state amendment. If they do --it will go to the SCOTUS. Or have anarchy on their steps.

~Murphy.

They did before when Prop 22 passed in 2000 and they will do so again.

Why?

Because denying a group of people their civil rights is Unconstitutional.

It's immoral.

It's unAmerican.

Learn that, Murphy.

At long last learn that and then teach it to yer immoral, anti-American, religulous bretheren and sisteren.

There is nothing wrong with traditional marriage--and folks recognize that sentiment.

Nobody is saying there's anything wrong with traditional marriage Murphy.

The idea that denying gay folks their equal rights under the law is in any way, shape of form "protecting traditional marriage" is pure hokum.

It's a canard.

It's purely an attack on a group of folks you personally find distasteful.

Learn that also.

Even Pat Buchanon admitted this morning that time is on the side of equal rights for gays.

Your antiquated notions are doomed to go the way of the dodo.

Be Well.

So now since P8 didn't pass. You are going to the courts. And with the court system in CA. Well, why do you bother to vote. Just take it court!

"...(the 9th Circuit) will try to overthrow the people again and like vote that the same sex weddings between May and November--have to stay recognized. "

Don't kid yourself: they won't invalidate what they themselves made legal. Those marriages are here to stay,

Nice title.

At least we know that even those close to Newt realize what a scumbag he is. I am heartened by this.

How long do you think until the ACLU sets up a court case to bring prop 8 to the CA SCOTUS? Or do they even need to? Quite frankly I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet.

"Out with the old sez Spud.

In with the new."

This should apply to the entire cast of righties on the Fox network. They're so outdated with their redundant, tired hatred.

It's time for a sweeping change at Fox.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable