Wheeeeeeee!

Gonna make him obey the law...radical!

Ooops that damn hard drive crashed!

Sorry your judgeship, we really really wanted to make sure their weren't no viruses in the computators, so Uncle Dick had them given MRI tests. I guess drinkin' and doctoring don't mix...

The idea seems to be to start so many fires that all the new administration can do is try and put them all out without concentrating on who started the fires. The Bush crime family will get away with all of it. Stay tuned for the pardons on the morning of 1/20/09.

Not to be a wet blanket, but can't Bush just use his Presidential pardon before he leaves office to combat this?

#4: what's up, similar pessimistic outlook buddy?

You can't produce what no longer exists.

AGAIN...material from my reading

in the FIRST PRESIDENTIAL administraion of our country there was a debate over the "jay treay" and congress tried to get documents from washington who SAID NO......that it was an afront to the seperation of powers.

he GOT it but you haters dont???????

and email from the president is the same thing as those documents way back then

but thats okay..I am sure when the messiah moves in and we are officialy in OBAMATOPIA...that most of your opinions on this will BE EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE

OBAMATOPIA.

Cool.

BL2

your reasoning is completely based on partisan ideology and no real logic.

Hey SandwichBoy, you realize the only people screaming about the OBAMATOPIA and how OBAMA WILL MAKE THINGS PERFECT and all that crap are you and your fellow right-wingers, right?

Seriously, give it a rest.

BLT-you do realize that by supporting the handling of the Jay Treaty, you're arguing against conservative thought. Welcome to Ombamatopia, comrade!-

James Madison, then a member of the House of Representatives, argued that the treaty could not, under Constitutional law, take effect without approval of the House, since it regulated commerce and exercised legislative powers granted to Congress. The debate which followed was an early example of originalism, in which Madison, the "Father of the Constitution," ironically, lost.

In the context of United States constitutional interpretation, originalism is a family of theories central to all of which is the proposition that the Constitution has a fixed and knowable meaning, which was established at the time of its drafting. A neologism, "originalism" is a formalist theory of law and a corollary of textualism. Today, it is popular among U.S. political conservatives, and is most prominently associated with Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork.

BTW, I just heard that lying thug of a chickenhawk war criminal Dick Cheney say that the war in Iraq started with a direct attack on the US.

That lying piece of shit has 70 days until he should start to be concerned about whether or not his war crimes will go unpardoned by the little texas twit.

BLT does your bottom hurt after that spanking???

That lying piece of shit has 70 days until he should start to be concerned about whether or not his war crimes will go unpardoned by the little texas twit.

#13 | Posted by midiman at 2008-11-11 11:40 AM | Reply

Relax. You don't want your mascara to run, do you?

You can't possibly be that naive to think anything will happen to Bush or Cheney, can you?

You can't possibly be that naive to think anything will happen to Bush or Cheney, can you?

#15 | Posted by 101Chairborne

"The Bush administration had argued that the courts didn't have the power to order the White House to retrieve any missing emails."

And they'll continue to act so, continually stalling and stonewalling attempts to enforce the court's ruling. Then, come January 20, they'll leave, having left the court's decision unfulfilled and no one will have the balls to hold it to them.

I'm not holding my breath in anticipation of anything being done to Bush, Cheney ect by anyone when they leave office.

The remedy for illegal activity by the Executive Branch is impeachment. I think, in the end, this other stuff will go no where and if it made it to the SC they will throw it out. I don't think that it would be an ideological decision either. The Constitution clearly spells out what needs to be done if the President has broken the law. That would trump a Federal Judge, IMHO.

"You can't produce what no longer exists."

Hagbard: Emails typically go through more than one server; if someone looks hard enough (and possibly does some forensic data recovery), it's possible that the emails could be recovered. It's also possible that all servers involved could be scrubbed, but that would have taken a pretty sophisticated effort, done by people who knew exactly what they were doing. That mighta happened, might notta happened.

I have an idea that Dubya's post-White House life is going to make some lawyers very rich indeed.

BL2

your reasoning is completely based on partisan ideology and no real logic.

#10 | Posted by ak_patel at

so how does pointing out a historical fact show that

please explain your comment further

northguy

look.........the seperation of power and executive priviledge isnt a partisan issue

the main problem I had with clintons use of executive priviledge was when he used it to get his dick sucked............( dont EVER TELL ME I CANT get that in on any issue....LOL)

so it doesnt matter to me what side washington was on with that treaty and all......thats beside the point I was making and the "jay treaty" wasnt what I was talking about

BUT THIS does prove one thing when you say that

you prove my point that libs will forget all about thier indignation towards this when obama makes the very same claim........

BLT does your bottom hurt after that spanking???

danni

just like I have told larry

stop referring to my beautifull and round and soft butt........it only gets you excited...........LOL

".The nine-page outline of the White House's email problems invites companies to bid on a project to recover the missing electronic messages. The White House hasn't said whether it has hired a contractor."""

Yeah. Right. Good luck with that.

101....you are very condescending towards Indian-Americans.

You really have no reason to be. We are not violent people. We work hard. We obey the law (obviously not everyone).

What is your problem?

BL2.

You are making a prediction based on no relevant examples. Who has said that Obama is not accountable for what he does?

Is Fisher Stevens an Indian American? I'm wanting to know why you have the thin skin.

101...I would really like an answer as to why you hate us (Indian-Americans).

thin skin? what the fuck are you talking about.

I am not a racist...maybe that is why I do not understand your subtle insults.

Why did you ask ME if I knew him? You know I am an Indian-American.

You didnt ask anyone else? What is the significance, if that was not an insult?

As a matter of law, White House records of the President's work, which is supposed to be in the Public's Best Interest, belongs in the public domain.

The reason Shrub has fought this is the record will clearly reveal he never had the public's best interests in mind, in anything he said or did.

Who said I hate you? You recieve the same amount of ridicule as anyone else. You're not special.

You have called me "Shri" and some other stereotypical derogatory names already. Therefore, I am rightly assuming that your comment was no other than another insult.

Yes. But you base the ridicule on my culture identity. Therefore...I am sure you have heard this before (no coincidence)...that you are a racist.

Sorry, but I do not hate, or think negatively of white people.

Plus...I am in the Georgia Army Reserve. I am patriotic. You hate to see people like me, who completely destroy your perception of immigrants.

Why did you ask ME if I knew him? You know I am an Indian-American.

You didnt ask anyone else? What is the significance, if that was not an insult?

#30 | Posted by ak_patel at 2008-11-11

but DONT you guys ALL know each other?????

( thats a joke by the way))

actually what I meant was that you said I was being partisan and then northguy tried to INSULT me and call me a liberal.,...LOL

my comment was that even our FIRST president believed in the seperation of powers and executive priviledge but here.........libs have never wanted that to extend to bush

Therefore 101....I feel sorry for you. You are ignorant by choice.

BL2...I was responding to 101. Nothing to do with you.

And...you are right partially. But you over generalize liberals.

I only give back what I get from liberals

all republicans arent stupid hicks from trailor parks who marry thier cousin...........for instance

I wasnt anywhere near her..........LOL

I have an idea that Dubya's post-White House life is going to make some lawyers very rich indeed.

#20 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore

I know there are copies of all those emails floating around the tubes somewhere, I'm just saying that will be the argument. And the clock is running short to expect anything to be done about it. Come 1/20 we'll be hearing about how the American people are all about moving forward. The F*ck I say, I want to know precisely what we did in the past so as to prevent against it being done in the future. Failure to do so is tacit approval of it all.

ak, please dont feed the troll.

"The F*ck I say, I want to know precisely what we did in the past so as to prevent against it being done in the future. Failure to do so is tacit approval of it all."

Hagbard:

I couldn't agree more. I have more hope than you do that some stuff will come out, mainly because I think there will be some international pressure for it. Our actions on the WMDs, Abu Ghraib, and Gitmo mean that uncovering stuff isn't just the U.S.'s call.

Regardless........I'll bet nothing ever happens to bush........

I have more hope than you do that some stuff will come out, mainly because I think there will be some international pressure for it.
#41 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore

International pressure makes it a little more plausible to me, but not much.

Remember when Biden said his Presidency was going to be tested in the first six months? I'm afraid that if something does happen that all this other stuff will fall by the wayside.

Failure to do so is tacit approval of it all.

I'd like to see Bush held accountable for his actions and the actions of his administration, but the pessimist in me says "no way in hell that'll happen."

Ak,

You are correct on 101, he is an unrepentant racist.

Ask him about his hero, James Earl Ray, the assasin who killed Martin Luthor King.

On second thought, dont bother.

There is no hope for him.

Try to ignore him and his tiny little hate filled brain; he has nothing to add to the conversation.

You have called me "Shri" and some other stereotypical derogatory names already. Therefore, I am rightly assuming that your comment was no other than another insult.

#33 | Posted by ak_patel at 2008-11-11 12:31 PM | Reply

I don't know what a "Shri" is, but thanks for the new word. I don't even recall any derogatory names that I've called you. I refered to you owning a convenience store, but if you don't like that then maybe you should take that up with Joe Biden?
As for being in the Georgia Army Reserves, so what? What is a Georgia Army Reserves anyway? Do you mean you're in the reserves or you're in the NG?
Regardless, that useless tid bit of info doesn't change anything.

OldWeaknStupid,
Boo! How you doing coward?

Just curious how a District Judge can order the Executive Branch to do anything. I thought Congress was the only entity with that power. Speaking of which have they had hearings?

Dont forget to pick up yer KKK robes from the cleaners 101.

If James Earl Ray is a hero to you,(and you have said he is) then we dont have to worry what names you call me.
I would hate to see who else is in yer hero list. Sirhan Sirhan and Oswald come to mind.

Have a shitty pretend-Veterans day ya piece of shit racist pretend tuff guy.

OldWeaknStupid,
Boo!
1. I don't wear a robe
2. James Earl Ray was a patriotic American
3. Lindy England
4. The pretend vet and pretend tough guy lines never get old...

101, dont sugar coat your admiration of Ray.
What you said was that he was a 'hero'.

101 you are a hate monger.

I put in that personal information to have a personal touch you redneck.

Plus.. I hope you step inside one of my convenience stores....

OldWhiskey...

101 is fucked up.

Yer preachin to the choir AK.
It's one thing to be stupid, but to insist that you have the duty to lay it bare...I dunno what to tell ya.
He sure is fucked up.

101 is an asshole, not an act. Anyone who spends every post insulting others here in the most egregious ways isn't playing a game.

He'll use any personal info you post (while he's sound asleep), troll comments the next day, save it, and fling it for months on end - just to BE an asshole.

He should have stayed banished but for the cries of "FREE 101 !" from other assholes who think his sick schtick is somehow amusing.

Dont forget to pick up yer KKK robes from the cleaners 101.

I would hate to see who else is in yer hero list. Sirhan Sirhan and Oswald come to mind.

Have a shitty pretend-Veterans day ya piece of shit racist pretend tuff guy.

#48 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2008

maybe he could borrow some from sheets byrd a longtime dEM senator who WE KNOW used them

and as far as shiran shiran, lets just leave that talk to OBAMAS buddy.........a man named ayers who has WRITTEN about him

you libs are so transparent

The adminstration has agreed to hand over all the emails they were able to recover.

Monica's emails are right on top.