5 cops allege pregnancy bias
In lawsuit, female officers say city illegally refused to assign them light duty.
Paul Egan and George Hunter / The Detroit News
www.detnews.com
DETROIT -- Five female Detroit police officers have filed a federal lawsuit against the city, alleging the department discriminated against them by refusing to place them on light duty when they were pregnant.
Instead, pregnant officers are required to use their sick leave and then go on unpaid leave, the lawsuit filed late Monday in U.S. District Court in Detroit alleges.
"Plaintiffs suffered serious consequences as a result of the pregnancy discrimination they faced," alleges the complaint filed by Bloomfield Hills attorney Deborah Gordon and the Michigan ACLU.
"The ... policy places incredible financial burden on these women, including forcing some to rely on Medicaid in order to obtain health insurance and to use food stamps to support themselves.
"The policy also imposes severe emotional burdens on pregnant officers and hampers their career advancement for years after their pregnancies."
The department used to allow pregnant officers to go on light duty but changed the policy in 2004, after the police officers' union filed a grievance on behalf of a male officer with an off-work injury.
That officer complained that 17 pregnant officers were able to get light duty while he could not, according to police arbitration documents.
Detroit Police spokesman James Tate said the department has no choice but to deny pregnant officers light duty because of the arbitrator's ruling.
"We didn't want to do it, but the union filed a grievance and won," Tate said. "We agree they should be given restricted duty, but for us to give pregnant officers any special consideration would be a violation of the arbitrator's ruling."
Now, the department only allows light duty for on-the-job injuries.
[.....]