Democrats also made a number of concessions, abandoning demands that bankruptcy judges be empowered to modify home mortgages on primary residences for people in foreclosure. They also agreed not to dedicate a portion of any profits from the bailout program to an affordable housing fund that Republicans claimed would primarily assist social service organizations that support the Democratic Party, the official said.
Oh and can we get Buffalo Bob in here to whine about how this was done for "the little guy"?
#19 | Posted by IraqiBukkake at 2008-09-28 11:04 AM | Reply
I can understand your confusion, since the article was written in English. The passage you quote states that Dems wanted bankruptcy judges to be able to modify mortgage rates so homeowners could save their homes.
Republicans didn't want bankruptcy judges to be able to modify mortgages so people could save their home.
The Dems also wanted to create a fund from any profits that would go to an affordable housing program so more "little guys" could own their own home.
The republicans opposed this fund saying that it would primarily assist social service organizations that support the dem party.
That republicans don't support social programs and dems do support programs--this outcome is not surprising.
Your quote states that dems conceded (That means "gave up") their attempt to get these things for the "little guy" so that the bail out could become a reality.
Your quote highlights the difference between dems and reps. Reps are all about the corporate bailout, but not the little guy. The dems are for the little guy, but the reps obstruct any help the dems try to give him. Like Universal Health Care--Education--Freedom.