Sometimes I am just so, so proud........

can't wait to hear the story about how a teacher shoots a student.

or about how children get shot in the crossfire as a teacher gets all john wayne on a tresspasser with a gun...

but seriously, 110 students? this is the school that is so in jeopardy that they need to arm their teachers? how many teachers does a school with 110 students have anyway?

You forgot to capitalize, "chosen one".

10 demerits and no Polish Sausage before bed for you, young man.

-how many teachers does a school with 110 students have anyway?

You don't need very many if they are well armed.

DR Obama fellators.

Uh oh, you're gonna get TonyRoma all stirred up.

Stand by your man
Give him two arms to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely
Stand by your man

Fuck you, Lee!

TonyRoma would never respond im an irrational manner regarding criticism of Obama.

Even mentioning Tony's name is racist. Simply by mentioning it you conjure up images of his blackness, not to mention the disturbing fact that he's a 911 Conspiracist.

How funny is it that aRoma could be such a sycophant for Obama that he could almost make you forget what a fucking 911 crackpot he is?

Being a Texan, myself, I'm not surprised this is happening.
While this is guaranteed to bring a lot of controversy, I rather focus on the sadness of this situation and reality that we have failed to offer a safe and protected place for future generations to become the leaders of tomorrow.

When will the madness end?

not to mention the disturbing fact that he's a 911 Conspiracist.

Posted by 101Chairborne

What's wrong with that? Sounds like a nice guy, I like him already. Anybody with enough ability to discern to see that it was an inside job, deserves a second look.

Other than the fact that BuffaloBob, bani, and that unemployed skidmark from Denmark are all believers as well? Tons of shit.

101,

Tony isn't a 911 conspiracy theorist. Remember, when he posts huge cut and paste jobs from sites like "bushtotallydid911.com" he's just "examining all the evidence."

That's right. Just asking questions...Nothing more, nothing less.

Helloooooo?

This same exact story had been linked on the Front Page for days and had about 174 posts on it.

101

I think it is whacky to think that a smoky kerosene fire weakens steel. The planes were less than half full of kerosene, and most of that burned off in the fireballs. Kerosene has to be a gas/fumes/mist before it burns--it does not burn in its liquid state.

I find it hard to believe that a giant ass plane can hit the Pentagon and we don't have a picture of it.

Ted Olson never received a phone call from his wife. Why would he lie about that?

I guess you have no questions--everything seems perfectly fine to you.

he's just "examining all the evidence."

Posted by JOE at 2008-08-18 01:34 PM

That's right. Just asking questions...Nothing more, nothing less.

Posted by 101Chairborne at 2008-08-18 01:42 PM

And the problem with "examining all the evidence" is.....?

And the problem with Asking questions is......?

Boob,
Scenario 1- You are a whacked out senior from Columbus, OH and you talk to walls. You are prone to skipping/forgetting your meds. You say some of the craziest shit imaginable and actually think you are making sense.
Scenario 2- You are batshit crazy and have no idea that you need meds. There is nobody in the neighborhood to check on you and any family or friends you may have had are unaware of your present condition.

"And the problem with "examining all the evidence" is.....?

And the problem with Asking questions is......?"

There is no problem with doing either of those things. The point was that some people are never simply neutral purveyors of information - they clearly only "examine" the facts that support their opinion, and only "ask questions" that ultimately lead to their preferred conclusion.

So like I said - no problem doing those two things - if that's actually what you're doing. Leave it to you to miss the point.

can't wait to hear the story about how a teacher shoots a student.

How fucking sick.

"can't wait to hear the story about how a teacher shoots a student."

This was a real gem - a slip-up that provides plenty of insight into the liberal mindset here at the DR. Some of them love bad news that tends to support their worldview, so much that they are willing to see people killed just to be able to say "I told you so."

Porno for libs eh Joe?

I think this is a bad idea.
I am-however-willing to wait and see. IF none of the possible scenarios occur-students getting killed by some teacher going "John Wayne" on some intruder-or MORE students being killed than would have-because of the guns already in the school.
Look, it's simple.
I've known quite a few people who've been obsessed with gun ownership-they CANNOT keep anything quiet about what they carry and where they carry it.

Now, if those teachers are smart-they won't say whether or not they have a gun-I fully expect the ones that DO to broadcast it far and wide-thusly-making themselves the first to get shot.
Then the perps will have MORE guns & ammo to kill kids with.

From the article:
What are we going to do?" he said. "It's just common sense."

Common sense in Texass?

Tons of shit.

Posted by 101Chairborne

Wrong answer, sorry. I am an electrical engineer. You don't get to be an engineer without learning how to learn. And you don't learn, especially shit like quantum mechanics and thermodynamics without setting aside your personal passions.

I looked at all the evidence and Buffalo Bob is right about the kerosene. Try it yourself.

Get you a good kerosene fire going and stick a thermometer in it. It will not get hot enough to weaken steel. And if it did, by some cosmic intervention, the building still will not freefall. It will only freefall when the legs are knocked out from under it.

See this is not idle speculation. Physics don't lie.

BuffaloBob

Thought you'd like to see this post reprinted and highlighted in bold. Now what do your detractors have to say for themselves. hahaha

I am an electrical engineer. You don't get to be an engineer without learning how to learn. And you don't learn, especially shit like quantum mechanics and thermodynamics without setting aside your personal passions. I looked at all the evidence and Buffalo Bob is right about the kerosene. Try it yourself.

-- Lipzoidal

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I strongly believe that there was more burning in the WTC than kerosene. Furniture, plastics, rubber etc.

****Texas school district to let teachers carry guns ***

.......if I had a kid in a Texas school, I would be concerned.......

........first.....what mentality of a teacher would want to pack heat in class ??.....yeah...that kind......

.......second....the little pricks are going to yank his chain one day, piss him off really badly, and he is going to waste the class.......

......and then all the NRA retards are going to get on this site....and say ..."yeah its too bad, but guns don't wipe out school-rooms, teachers gone postal wipe out school-rooms"......

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I strongly believe that there was more burning in the WTC than kerosene. Furniture, plastics, rubber etc.

Posted by goatman at 2008-08-18 07:19 PM | Reply

And which of those things, or combination of those things--do you state will weaken steel in a smoky fire?

Burning furniture in a smoky fire will weaken steel?

Burning plastic in a smoky fire will weaken steel?

Burning rubber in a smoky fire will weaken steel?

Burning furniture, plastic, and rubber in a smoky fire will weaken steel?

Which of these combinations do you claim will get up to the 1800 degrees necessary to weaken steel? Then explain how that temperature could be maintained equally across the entire floor so that the failure was simultaneous.

Videos show the top floor with the huge mast starting to tilt as it fell--yet the claim is that it fell straight down to collapse floors below in a pancake effect.

There were news reports of secondary explosions every few minutes at the towers, and they can be heard. These explosions could be part of the controlled demolition---making the final explosions not seem so much like a demolition. Still--explosions can be see ahead of the collapse of the Towers, and explosions can be seen traveling up the sides of WTC7 Just as it collapses.

People who are looking with an open mind can see these things anyway.

Califchris

You can see for yourself their response.

Same as usual.

It's been proven that the combustibles that were in the WTC were more than suffecient to weaken steel and cause a collapse. I've given you engineering links in the past, but you simply pooh poohed them without giving any counter explanation why they were wrong. Probably because you did not understand the science and math involved. I realize that if it's not a youtube.com video you are mentally lost. But that's not my problem.

So I'm not going over this one again with you either. Maybe some other fool will bite.

Goatman

They were ridiculed because they were not scientific.

They said burning rubber, plastic, and furniture got up to 1800 degrees in a local smoke filled fire, and got hot enough to weaken steel across the entire floor in an equal manner so as to cause a uniform collapse.

Some idiots believe that crap.

Other scientists say exactly the opposite--you ignore them. It comes down to whether or not you think burning plastic, rubber, and furniture gets hot enough in a smoke filled fire to weaken the steel in the WTC towers in a uniform manner so as to cause a uniform collapse.

I don't see burning plastic, rubber, and furniture burning that hot. Lots of other steel structures have burned with the same components, and the steel didn't weaken. If steel weakened in fires, it would be a well known fact, and not a surprise, or unusual in anyway. Seems only the steel at the WTC weakens in fire.

"This was a real gem - a slip-up that provides plenty of insight into the liberal mindset here at the DR. Some of them love bad news that tends to support their worldview, so much that they are willing to see people killed just to be able to say "I told you so.""

I think when he later said "But seriously...." in the same post, that would indicate the first part of the post wasn't serious.

I, on the other hand, really want to see one of these morons lose a child just to teach them to think more like me.

The point was that some people are never simply neutral purveyors of information - they clearly only "examine" the facts that support their opinion, and only "ask questions" that ultimately lead to their preferred conclusion.

So like I said - no problem doing those two things - if that's actually what you're doing. Leave it to you to miss the point.

Posted by JOE at 2008-08-18 02:15 PM | Reply

The POINT is to find out what happened.

If things happened as the government says they happened--no amount of questioning or investigation could prove otherwise. If things didn't happen as the government says--an investigation should show the wrong doing and the people ersponsible should be punished.

It seems to me YOU are the one with the preconceived ideas and only want questions asked that reinforce your point of view.

Leave it to you to miss the point.
I would bet you still don't get it.

Again.

The POINT is to find out what happened.