I'm sure those citizens have been drinking liberal koolaid.

And then the morons were arrested for committing a crime that actually occurred. The end.

Some slugs to the chest from a 38 would put an end to this bullshit if they tried to lay hands on him.
Who the fuck do these morons think they are.

rwd

Speaking of morons, there is RWD.

Carl Rove is skating. He is one man if I found in an alley it would be over.

Do you mean some slugs to the chest of Karl Rove? If so I think thats a very good plan indeed! Why waste lawyer and court costs on a scum bag like Karl Rove!!!

These citizen are American heroes and they should launch a lawsuit againt the police who became criminally complicit by blocking the lawful arrest of a low life,treasonous,felon like Rove!

Speaking of morons, there is RWD.

Posted by nullifidian

Are you willing to say the same about anticadillac?

Didn't think so.

Besides I am a firm believer in self defense.

Tell me null, do those people have a case?

Do they know the definition of treason and all the other so called charges they made up.

I doubt it.

They are putting their lives in their hands by pulling this kind of shit.

Like I said, who do these morons think they are.

rwd

I wish I could be one of Karl Rove's bodyguards. I could get paid for what I really love, kicking the shit out of some lib pussies!

Rove might be packin!

Karl Rove is now a private citizen. I assume he is not accorded any type of special protections. Killing him would be no different than killing anyone else in this country, be it a street corner crack junkie or a welfare mom. So I think it would be nice for a change if instead of some poor schmuck being victimized it were to be a son of a bitch who has richly earned it through his contempt for truth and all which America used to stand for.
Or put another , if someone is gonna be murdered (which they will be, because it happens on a daily basis throughout this nation), it might as well be Rove. Not that I am calling for his murder or anything. It's just that all things being equal if someone has to get killed it might as well be someone whose evil lies and spin have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

FTFA: The four accused Rove of election fraud and conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States in the time before the Iraq war.

Ya gotta admit they do have a point.

Spud to Karl Rove:

J'accuse, Roundboy.

Treason?
Sedition?
Subersive Activities?

Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.

The article fergot to mention the outing of Val Plame specifically but Spud imagines that was part of the whole "treason" thing.

So... were these Concerned Catholics being idiots fer going through with a stunt that was sure to FAIL?

Hell no, they got arrested, they got out, they got ink.

That were deep-fried WIN on a stick fer them cats.

Got out of jail in short order.

Got some good ink.

The Point was made.

The point being that Karl Rove is a traitor to the United States and that he deserves the scorn and derision of his fellow citizens (as well as interested international onlookers).

So sez Spud.

Spud has spake!

Be Well.

Off to jail they go--

And so much for the libs thinking that a person is entitled to a trial--just kill his ass--right?

Like Lincoln??

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Hang the bastard..................

Murphy-
re: "Liberalism is a mental disorder."

Unlike autism, which is a "phony disease...a fraud...[and] a racket"

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Posted by MURPHY at 2008-07-27 10:09 PM | Reply

America was founded on liberal thought. Freedom is a liberal concept. Maybe you are living in the wrong country.

I think there was like 8 of them, thus the press calls them Iowans so it sounds like thousands. You know, like Obama's 200,000 when it was more like 20,000 and a concert to boot. Same thing happened in Oregon.

KBM, as we speak I am working on some trumped up allegations to discredit you. Could ya help me out.

KBM-
re: "You know, like Obama's 200,000 when it was more like 20,000 and a concert to boot."

I hadn't heard the updated figure of "20,000". Give me a link so I can be better informed.

Warrant? I don't need no stinkin warrant.

Link? I don't need no stinkin link.

So the German police estimate a crowd of 200,000. KBM says it's 20,000. Hmmm...let's see...Germans produce BMW's, Republicans produce KBM's.

Thats what Bush said: "Warrant? I don't need no stinkin warrant - to wiretap and entrap Americans or to send them to their deaths in my illegal "Oil War" in Iraq!"

I'd like to see them round up all the top Republican Nazi-Scum-Bags and their gutless supporters and have a mass execution in Washington! Wouldn't that be a marvelous and much deserved blow for justice!

And so much for the libs thinking that a person is entitled to a trial--just kill his ass--right?

Posted by MURPHY

Who tried to kill anyone?
The only ones here wishing instant death with no trial seem to be those on the right, who like their Communist counterparts seem to think that dissent should be punished with death.

Some day in the future Rove himself and others will ask just what did he achieve. The answer will be that he managed to avoid indictment in the most deceitful and corrupt administration America has ever seen.

Why are there so many people more interested in vengeance than in getting the problems fixed?

"Getting the problem fixed.." to me means arresting Rove and taking him to trial.

To me it's a huge problem when a politico is using the Justice Dept to seek revenge or upsetting elections by prosecuting political opponents who are innocent to win elections.

He was using a trick from an old Texas playbook of his where he'd call his buddy at the FBi so an announcement could be made days before numerous elections that Democrat candidates were 'under investigation' - simply to affect the outcome of those man elections. None were ever charged.

We'll know more about the case of the former Governor of Alabama as well. That situation stinks and will be revisited.

We don't need those type of dirty politics involving our judicial and law enforcement system. That' what they do in banana republics. They are egregious and unfit practices for America. If Rove is guilty he should face the consequences as a warning to others.

Moder8, "Brown and Shaw attempted such a citizen's arrest immediately following Rove's introduction. Both held and began to read a written "Citizen's Arrest Complaint" that cited Federal Criminal statutes and the Iowa Code."

I stand corrected. It was 2 and not 8.

Well cry your eyes out liberals because no one and I repeat no one in this administation is going to jail not now or ever. Keep fantasizing because its good for your mental health.

Keep believing that all sorts of crimes were committed by every rascally republican you see on TV. Keep hoping beyond hope that those you disagree with will be shut up for what they believe.

"Liberalism is a mental illness" and I see fervent examples of its nutiness every day here on the DR.

Carl Rove is one big pussy. He looks like the Pillsbury do-boi. Us liberal koolaid sucking boys
would like to hang the big bastard.

I don't want to hang him, but I would like to see him respond to his subpoena and testify under oath before Congress.

If it were you or me, not answering a subpoena would likely lead to an arrest warrant.

This is America, where all men are equal before the law.

We will be reminded this forcefully by the Republicans, just as soon as we get a Democratic president.

this = of this

Rove might be packin!

Posted by shirtsbyeric

I am sure that he packs something.

"subversive activities leading to the deaths of 300,000 Iraqi civilians"

If Danni were there she'd be tossing around that fake stat of 1 million Iraqis killed. Then the crowd would see some action.

America was founded on liberal thought. Freedom is a liberal concept. Maybe you are living in the wrong country.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-07-27 11:02 PM | Reply

Bob,

Are you still trying to shop around this bullshit? You know that the 'liberal' thought of Jefferson, Adams, etc., is vastly different from what today's libs think and believe.

It's quite the opposite, in fact. Today, libs are in blind lockstep, regardless of the facts of reality.

"It's quite the opposite, in fact. Today, libs are in blind lockstep, regardless of the facts of reality."

Posted by vernon at 2008-07-28 07:50 AM

Vernon, you hit the nail squarely with that comment. Case in point, Al Gore and the libs do not want to dicuss any evidence that disproves the myth of man-made global warming.

"You know that the 'liberal' thought of Jefferson, Adams, etc., is vastly different from what today's libs think and believe."

riiight. I'm sure Jefferson would have approved of warrantless wire taps, unnecessary invasions of countries who never attacked us, signing statements negating the will of Congress, etc.
Pretending that Jefferson and the founding fathers would approve of what passes for conservative thought today is just plain laughable.
If the righties of today were alive in the revolutionary period we would still be an obedient colony of Britain.

Vernon, you hit the nail squarely with that comment. Case in point, Al Gore and the libs do not want to dicuss any evidence that disproves the myth of man-made global warming.

LOL!

I have yet to see any factual evidence that disproves the global warming from the conservative righties.

They throw out alot of conjectured opinions and act as if they are facts but that's why they are never in any scientific forum because they would look quite silly.

Pretending that Jefferson and the founding fathers would approve of what passes for conservative thought today is just plain laughable.

Posted by danni at 2008-07-28 08:25 AM | Reply

Danni,

Nowhere in my posts did I say anything even close to that.

Your positions, as usual, are without defense so you hafta make up shit like this.

Your post is a perfect example of WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID: Blind, lockstep thinking. No discussion of facts in reality.

Just SHOUTING your same old talking points and making up lies that fit your stance.

I have yet to see any factual evidence that disproves the global warming

Posted by moneywar at 2008-07-28 08:33 AM | Reply

It is not possible to prove a negative, only to disprove bullshit with reasonable thought, based on reality

Let's see you disprove that you didn't smoke crack and rape a child six months ago. Prove you did not!

Come on. Where's your evidence! Prove it!

Moron

I don't know why everyone's going apeshit about "getting Rove, Bush, et al." right now.

Even if he was rounded up, given a trial, and convicted, Bush would pardon him instantly. Just like Libby.

Democrats are waiting patiently for January 20, 2009. Bush will have no power to pardon anyone. Then justice will begin.

only to disprove bullshit with reasonable thought, based on reality

And what did I say? All your supposed evidence to disprove global warming is all conjectured opinion never able to disprove the facts and data of global warming.

You actually agree with what I am saying yet try and sound and leave the tone as if you think it is fact.

You're to laughable.

Let's forget the fact that to execute a citizens arrest you MUST witness the crime....

I hope these clowns get themselves some hefty fines and some time for attempted false imprisonment.

idiots.

That's my state! *proud*
Didn't know about the protest beforehand.

This thread has hold the record for the greatest liberal circle jerk of all time.

"And then the morons were arrested for committing a crime that actually occurred."

I don't know that Rove is necessarily the guilty one but given that the reasons for going into Iraq were never true and that the only Americans who have benefited from this just happen to have ties to the Bushies, I don't see how anyone could say there has been no treason. Given the circumstantial evidence, the anti-treason arguement seems incredibly naive to me.

Most we can say is that we really don't want to know because not even the press seems to want to investigate.

"Most we can say is that we really don't want to know because not even the press seems to want to investigate."

Posted by Sully at 2008-07-28 09:21 AM

Since alot of Democrats believed Saddam had WMDs, the press doesn't want to investigate their friends.

Most we can say is that we really don't want to know because not even the press seems to want to investigate.

Maybe because they know it is a waste of time going after a political advisor. Knowing the alternative media and left leaning groups will uncover anything news worthy. Which is almost comical these nutjobs would try this stunt and end up arrested. Any doubts which way they slant?

I'd like to see them round up all the top Republican Nazi-Scum-Bags and their gutless supporters and have a mass execution in Washington! Wouldn't that be a marvelous and much deserved blow for justice!

Posted by AntiCadillac at 2008-07-28 12:18 AM | Reply | Flag:

YES, YES, YES....let's do what the venerable AntiCadillac says....we're all for it.

Sincerely,

Stalin and PolPot (we are proud to be heroes of AntiCadillac)

""America was founded on liberal thought. Freedom is a liberal concept. Maybe you are living in the wrong country.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-07-27 11:02 PM | Reply

Bob,

Are you still trying to shop around this bullshit? You know that the 'liberal' thought of Jefferson, Adams, etc., is vastly different from what today's libs think and believe.""

Posted by Vernon

""Pretending that Jefferson and the founding fathers would approve of what passes for conservative thought today is just plain laughable.

Posted by danni at 2008-07-28 08:25 AM | Reply

Danni,

Nowhere in my posts did I say anything even close to that.""

Vernon, whatever you say but your posts speak for themselves.

Go after Rove for engineering false prosecutions over decades to sway elections, slander and possibly corruption and money laundering. Publically condemn him for giving Bush a nod prior to invading Iraq.

But this unelected White House Guru is not a responsible person in charge. The responsible people are primarily Bush, Cheney, Rummy, Wolfowitz and Gonzales. I think the only thing Rice could be charged with is incompetence, which for all I know, is not a crime.

Conyer's hearings on Presidential Power last week were fucking fabulous. Not as good as the House of Commons debates, but for once we got intelligent, open discussions on the topic o abuse of power and worse. The speakers, both pro and con, made their cases clearly and succinctly, unlike the double talk that fills newspapers and airways. But, Conyers is past his prime. The Congress would be better if its average age were younger.

Are you still trying to shop around this bullshit? You know that the 'liberal' thought of Jefferson, Adams, etc., is vastly different from what today's libs think and believe.

It's quite the opposite, in fact. Today, libs are in blind lockstep, regardless of the facts of reality.

Posted by vernon at 2008-07-28 07:50 AM |

Liberalism doesn't change. Neither does conservatism. Liberals are always for freedom of thought and action that doesn't interfere with someone elses rights. Conservatives are against liberal thought and action and seek government control every aspect of an individuals life--except the financial aspects.

You know nothing of liberal thought or values. Liberals are noted for not agreeing with each other--it is the conservatives who are lockstep gooesteppers who unthinkingly parrot each others thoughts. You should STFU about things you don't understand.

You should STFU about things you don't understand.

Knowing your sane, rational, educated posts that leaves out just about everyone here out. Who would be here to rebutt you Bob?

Vernon and "blind lockstep" do seem to be made for each other.

Go after Rove for engineering false prosecutions over decades to sway elections, slander and possibly corruption and money laundering. Publically condemn him for giving Bush a nod prior to invading Iraq.

Hey George as your politcal advisor I want you prosecute a war in Iraq. I think your approval rating will benefit during your last year in office and keep the White House in republican hands. It will also keep the majority of both Houses in 2006.

Karl Rove

"Since alot of Democrats believed Saddam had WMDs, the press doesn't want to investigate their friends."

I don't care what party people are from so if Demcorats were complicite in Bush's lying us into an unnecessary war then they should be face the same firing squad.

"Maybe because they know it is a waste of time going after a political advisor."

That is why I said I don't know that Rove is the guilty party here. He never took an oath of office.

If something like this happened everywhere Rove goes it would eventually begin to limit his ability to travel, make him fell uncomfortable within his own country. These people probably expected to be arrested but felt that the attempt was worth the price they will pay. They are doing something while we post on the internet. Kudos to them.

They are doing something while we post on the internet. Kudos to them.

God I hope they resist. Don't taze me bro.

Wouldn't that be a marvelous and much deserved blow for justice!
Posted by AntiCadillac

Don't you mean "blow TO justice", as these "executions" you're talking about would take place without a trial, judge, or jury? And you say Bush is bad for subverting justice...

**** Who the fuck do these morons think they are.
...Posted by rightwingdon ****

......they are we......the people........

BuffaloBob, those are interesting definitions of the words "liberal" and "conservative". Can you link me to where you got those definitions - and please make it a fairly mainstream source; something tells me that conservativesarebad.com is probably slightly biased.

"Liberalism doesn't change. Neither does conservatism. Liberals are always for freedom of thought and action that doesn't interfere with someone elses rights. Conservatives are against liberal thought and action and seek government control every aspect of an individuals life--except the financial aspects.

You know nothing of liberal thought or values. Liberals are noted for not agreeing with each other--it is the conservatives who are lockstep gooesteppers who unthinkingly parrot each others thoughts. You should STFU about things you don't understand."

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-07-28 10:01 AM

Maybe you should take your own advice, Buffalo Bob, because you know not of what you speak. It's the other way around. True conservatives seek to remove the government from the peoples lives, while liberals seek to employ the government to control our healthcare and many other things.

Here's just one example. If liberals are so tolerant of different thoughts, then why are they actively trying to eradicate conservative talk radio via government imposed re-instatement of the Fairness Doctrine?

BuffaloBob, those are interesting definitions of the words "liberal" and "conservative". Can you link me to where you got those definitions - and please make it a fairly mainstream source; something tells me that conservativesarebad.com is probably slightly biased.

Posted by bartimus at 2008-07-28 10:44 AM

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
liberal Audio Help /ˈlɪbərəl, ˈlɪbrəl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[lib-er-uhl, lib-ruhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
adjective 1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts: a liberal donor.
10. given freely or abundantly; generous: a liberal donation.
11. not strict or rigorous; free; not literal: a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12. of, pertaining to, or based on the liberal arts.
13. of, pertaining to, or befitting a freeman.
noun 14. a person of liberal principles or views, esp. in politics or religion.

why are they actively trying to eradicate conservative talk radio via government imposed re-instatement of the Fairness Doctrine?

Posted by Republican4ever at 2008-07-28 11:13 AM | Reply

How would presenting an opposing viewpoint equate to eradicating conservative talk radio?

Unless of course the conservative talking points could not be sustained against an opposing viewpoint.

libs want rove in jail for grievous crime of bein a thorn in their side ---for not acceptin their right to rule ---for bein good at his job-it should be noted after all the hype rove was not even indicted in the great leak case
jasman

"How would presenting an opposing viewpoint equate to eradicating conservative talk radio?

Unless of course the conservative talking points could not be sustained against an opposing viewpoint."

Posted by 726 at 2008-07-28 11:17 AM

Because, for a station to air three hours of the very popular Rush Limbaugh program, it would then be required to air three hours of liberal programming which no one would listen, a ratings killer. As you know, ratings are everything. So, instead of going out of business, the station may decide to change its format, leaving conservative talk radio without a forum.

"...for a station to air three hours of the very popular Rush Limbaugh program, it would then be required to air three hours of liberal programming..."

That's not what the Fairness Doctrine requires. Got anything else?

That's not what the Fairness Doctrine requires. Got anything else?

Posted by Danforth at 2008-07-28 11:34 AM

Maybe not in the form as it was previously enacted. However, the main purpose of the Fairness Doctrine was to require the presentation of opposing viewpoints for controversial topics. Maybe I've overstepped with the "equal time" example, but nobody really knows what changes Congress may incorporate.

Some peope really need to get a fucking life. Give me a beak.

If our founders saw the size of the goverment now they would slit theirs throats. I think someone needs to arrest the f***tards trying to pass this $300B housing bill without cuts back to pay for it. If you got a adjustable rate and now can't afford TO DAMN BAD!! Why should our children have to deal with it.

*** Tell me null, do those people have a case?

Posted by rightwingdon ****

......yup.......the Don Sielegman case will put Rove behind bars......

......not that its Rove's only crime, but it will be the easiest and quickest to be prosecuted........

......once the partisan AG shielding Rove is replaced......

***** Rove might be packin!
Posted by shirtsbyeric ******

......yeah......he packs bon-bons up his arse......

......Bush used to go fishing for them, thats why Bush called Rove "Turd Blossom".......

......Bush never knew what surprises he was going to find up there....

More citizens rights flushed down the toilet while Bush was in office.

They are putting their lives in their hands by pulling this kind of shit.

Like I said, who do these morons think they are.

rwd

Posted by rightwingdon at 2008-07-27 09:31 PM | Reply | Flag

They're citizens who are completely within their right to do what they did, but because it was a member of the reich-wing clan, the gestapo chose to let him go and arrest the others.

Eroding Rights: The Bush Legacy!

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Posted by MURPHY at 2008-07-27 10:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

You're right!

And the only way to deal with this disorder is GUN THEM DOWN WHILE THEY'RE IN CHURCH!

That'll show 'em!

"And the only way to deal with this disorder is GUN THEM DOWN WHILE THEY'RE IN CHURCH!

That'll show 'em!"

Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2008-07-28 02:33 PM

Not a very solid plan. Since many liberals express a disbelief in God, they probably don't go to church.

More citizens rights flushed down the toilet while Bush was in office.

Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2008-07-28 02:27 PM |

Their right to prove they are fucking insane? Doesn't that still fall under the first amendment? Did Bush flush that down the toilet? Because I have read, seen and heard many, many fools from the left prove their sanity.

They're citizens who are completely within their right to do what they did, but because it was a member of the reich-wing clan, the gestapo chose to let him go and arrest the others.

Eroding Rights: The Bush Legacy!

Posted by COMMONSENSE

Actually? No. They were NOT within their rights. A citizen can only arrest for a crime committed in their presence. Iowa is how many hundreds of miles away from DC?

Let alone the fact they only believe/fervently HOPE he committed one. Zippy evidence. Hard to make an arrest with ZIPPY evidence.

But then, I guess if it is citizens, the rules of evidence are meaningless?

Not a very solid plan. Since many liberals express a disbelief in God, they probably don't go to church.

Posted by Republican4ever at 2008-07-28 02:44 PM | Reply | Flag:

Well, I guess that will make it harder for you and Joe Horn. You'll actually have to hunt them now, can't just go to a one-stop killing spree.

Their right to prove they are fucking insane? Doesn't that still fall under the first amendment? Did Bush flush that down the toilet? Because I have read, seen and heard many, many fools from the left prove their sanity.

Posted by crispee_oc at 2008-07-28 03:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your opinion regarding their state of sanity is completely irrelevant. Rights don't differentiate between people based on what others think.

Vernon, whatever you say but your posts speak for themselves.

Posted by danni at 2008-07-28 09:54 AM | Reply
Danni,

Yes, my posts do speak for themselves, but you don't like what I say so you have to make up shit and then try to attribute it to me.

Nowhere in the above posts have I said that the founding fathers were equal to current Conservatives. You made that up and then got snotty and self-righteous.

That's bi-polar

All your supposed evidence to disprove global warming is all conjectured opinion never able to disprove the facts and data of global warming.

Posted by moneywar at 2008-07-28 08:49 AM | Reply

Listen retard, you're agreeing with me that anegative can not be disproven. If it didn't happen, there's no way to do it.

Man-made global warming is all conjecture. The planet goes through various cycles, and there is no proof that this time around it's caused by human activity. All you have is your deep and abiding faith in your Messiah, Algore.

What did it in the past then? Whale farts? Shall we hunt whales to save the planet?

Vernon and "blind lockstep" do seem to be made for each other.

Posted by sitdown at 2008-07-28 10:13 AM | Reply

What a predictable response. And completely pointless and without substance. Not even mildly amusing; just tedious.

How typically liberal

What a predictable response. And completely pointless and without substance. Not even mildly amusing; just tedious.

How typically liberal

Posted by vernon at 2008-07-28 05:38 PM

And your response is NOT typical?

you are completely typical of conservative sheep.

These folks stood up for what they believe in. So they did not succeed and they were not perfect they were brave enough to try.

Karl Rove is in Contempt of Congress. I would say that as witness to that crime I would try and do the same thing (though I would be a bit sneakier about it...) as he needs to be delivered to Congress in Creedy's black bag!

No shining example of conservative lunacy than their complaining about a "Fairness Doctrine". Speaks volumes.

Just not Rush-Libaugh Approved Volumes, apparently.

BTW - Karl Rove is a homosexual. Beard wives twice. An Uncle who was gay. These things run in the family. Can't wait til we all find out exactly who Jeff Gannon was fucking late night in the White House. Maybe he bent both Rove and that draft dodging coke-snorting Cheerleader over the Lincoln Bed and double-fucked them.

Rah-Rah Sis-Boom-Bah!

Why should our children have to deal with it.

Posted by morgan_organ at 2008-07-28 01:04 PM

For the same reason they have to deal with the 980 billion Iraq war bill---you asked for it---they got it.

Why are there so many people more interested in vengeance than in getting the problems fixed?

Posted by goatman at 2008-07-28 12:53 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Ask Dubya...

...BTW, I haven't seen hide nor hair of Bush OR Cheney in Brattleboro or Marlboro Vermont. You'd figure if this whole 'Arrest a Republican Moron' campaign the nation is moving towards was a bunch of bull-pucky, that both Bush and Cheney would be standing erect in the middle of these town's Main Street squares.

Right?

Conservatives harping 'liberalism is a mental disorder' is a mental disorder.

It's like OCD!

Right on, arrest his fat no-account punk ass

I am sure that he packs something.

Posted by 726

Mostly ol' turd blossom just packs fudge, or is he primarily a "catcher"?

Mention Bush, Cheney, Rove, or Wal Mart and libs go nuts. It's so predictable but somehow just as funny to watch.

Hey dumpling who is barney frank and why is he a celebrated hero of the dem party?

BECAUSE HE'S A FLAMING HOMOSEXUAL WHO PIMPED BOYS OUT OF HIS OWN HOUSE??????

How convenient of the dr left, selective memory!

"...WHO PIMPED BOYS OUT OF HIS OWN HOUSE??????"

You probably know that that is not true but hope that no one else knows it, right?

BTW, I haven't seen hide nor hair of Bush OR Cheney in Brattleboro or Marlboro Vermont.

Posted by DUMPLING1 at 2008-07-28 07:43 PM | Reply

Fat Ugly Chick,

Why would anybody go to Vermont? These are politicians. Nobody gives a damn about New Hampshire, either, except when an election is coming.

You're all hot and wet down below because the mayor of Vermont approved some meaningless resolution to arrest someone? What a loser.

Besides, Vermont is worse than Berkley; it's Ann Arbor with nice leave. Even Bob Newhart realized it was all just a bad dream

I salute these people as true citizens of the United States, doing their best to defend the constitution against Bush's and Rove's attacks.

you have an incredible penchant for hatred (I hope you don't consider yourself a "Christian", 'cause if you do you need anger management classes)