Sawdust, you want an explanation of how socialized medicine would reduce costs.
What makes you think we are talking about socialized medicine here in the first place?
With the exception of England (which actually DOES have socialized medicine in their National Health system, where most hospitals are government funded and the doctors on goverment salaries), ALL of the other countries of the industrialized world have private hospitals, clinics, doctors, pharmacies, etc. ONLY the health insurance, not the actual practice of medicine, is run by the government as a single-payer system using tax money.
It's no different than the federal government-administered, taxpayer-funded, single-payer flood insurance that Republicans throughout the heartland are lining up to get after all of this year's flooding disasters. You'd think they would make a symbolic protest over this "socialized flood insurance" system and refuse their checks!
Or the federal government-administered, taxpayer-funded, single-payer insurance that protects the private individual's deposits in banks (FDIC) and savings & loans (FSLIC).
sawdust, could you take a stab at providing the economic definition of 'socialism' in a single sentence for me? You don't seem to understand what it means (any more than most Americans really understand what Communism means or Representative Democracy, or unregulated free market Capitalism means). Or are you merely one of the unthinking parrots who have been taught to squawk "Socialized Medicine. Socialized Medicine." whenever the rich and powerful, who are merrily looting the rest of the country see somebody fight back?
Bill Kristol, editor of the neoconservative Weekly Standard and cofounder of the neocon Project for a New American Century put it bluntly when he said:
"[Among conservatives] there's been too much pseudo-populism, almost too much concern and attention for, quote, 'the people'.... After all, we conservatives are on the side of the lords and barons.... We...are pulling up the drawbridge against the peasants."
Lest you think this an aberration of the neocons and not a core Conservative principle, in the 1950s, President Eisenhower's Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, echoed the same theme, "... somehow we find it hard to sell our values, namely that the rich should plunder the poor."
It is amazing how many average earning sheep line up so docilely to not only be sheared by "lords and barons," but to be skinned to the bone - all the while bleating "Down with Socialized Medicine, Down with Socialized Medicine."
Its enough to gag a maggot.