Who is McCain?

And that's something that Kerry should know about.

Yet one more important, cutting-edge, up to the minute article on the presidential campaign to be dissected and analyzed by our staff of crack analysts.

Rob? Care to commet?

er...comet.

I mean commie.

Damn! Comment!

Payback is a bitch ain't it John McCain Hmmmmmmmmmmm

Larry

Kerry is the Jimmy Carter that never was.

From the "Face the Nation" website:

"I'm challenging Senator McCain's judgment," Kerry said, "that says, 'There's no violent history between Sunni and Shia.' That's wrong. His judgment that says, 'This is going to increase the stability of the Middle East.' It hasn't, it's made it less stable. The judgment that says, quote, 'This will be the best thing for America and the world in a long time." It's the worst thing that we've done in a long time. And he's turned his [focus] away from Afghanistan and al Qaeda and made America less safe. That's dangerous for our country."

Kerry criticized McCain's continued support of the occupation, given the effect of a continuing presence of U.S. troops on the situation in Iraq and the region at large. He pointed to remarks by leaders in the Middle East who told him during a recent visit, "You, America, have served up to Iran Iraq on a platter."

"They are outraged by the ineptitude of what has been done by those who decided it was smart to go into Iraq," said Kerry, who feels the Republican Party is now in turmoil over the "reality" of McCain's position, which is that "he has a plan for staying in Iraq and Barack Obama has a plan for getting out of Iraq."

Full transcript (PDF) at:

And ya gotta admit, crashing those 5 airplanes doesn't exactly make him the 21st Century version of Patton or Napoleon either.

Rob? Care to commet?

Posted by sagmain

Yes, and I'll comment too :)

just a few years ago, John Kerry was begging this man to be his vice president, literally a heartbeat away from the presidency... and then he cried like a little bitch when John McCain told him "no."

Kerry is a little girl trying to get even with the guy who wouldn't go to the dance with him.

McCain lacks the judgement to be POTUS?

Uh-huh and...?

Wot, that's it?

Kerry fergot "temperment".

"Kerry is a little girl trying to get even with the guy who wouldn't go to the dance with him.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole"

Guess that makes you the ugly step-sister that looks longingly at the neighbor's Great Dane.

And there you have it!

Commetary from our crack analyst.

Thank you Rob!

the end of the article proves what a joke Kerry is...

For the record, Kerry is not among those being mentioned as possible running mates for McCain.

if the press or anyone took John Kerry seriously, they wouldn't be trying to be funny about Kerry's comments...

Guess that makes you the ugly step-sister that looks longingly at the neighbor's Great Dane.

Posted by Snark_Needleton

Wow... funny name and posts... you're amazing.

Holy shit, Frank55 its hard to believe but you may have competition for most unfunny poster.

You've got the title, tits for brains.

Kerry is a little girl trying to get even with the guy who wouldn't go to the dance with him.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole at 2008-07-06 09:32 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag:

More like Kerry is the Guy who is doing a little paybacking towards the Man He called a Friend before that Friend stabbed Him in the back.

Larry

More like Kerry is the Guy who is doing a little paybacking towards the Man He called a Friend before that Friend stabbed Him in the back.

Larry

Posted by LarryMohr

But we're in agreement that Kerry is just acting out of revenge... okay, that's a start.

Kerry thought this man was more suited to be president then ANY Democrat. Think about that for a minute... John McCain a Republican was John Kerry's first choice to be his VP, but now he says he lacks the judgement? Come on... Kerry's a joke.

Just another reason we can thank God the country wasn't stupid enough to elect John Kerry president.

Judgment.. John Kerry is criticizing McCain's judgment.. what a pompous jackass.

Judgment.. John Kerry is criticizing McCain's judgment.. what a pompous jackass.

That Kerry's 100% correct doesn't matter, of course.

Just another reason we can thank God the country wasn't stupid enough to elect John Kerry president.

YEAH! Bush's 2nd term has just been fucking awesome!

Idiot.

Its really funny how the media is making Kerry look like an ass on this... here is the MSNBC take on it:

"What a clown...

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole"

Plenty of room in your car, then?

Plenty of room in your car, then?

Posted by Snark_Needleton

Okay big guy... please, stop trying... we're all really embarassed for you, nobody is laughing, nobody cares... walk away with some dignity left.

Plug it up, a-hole, no one cares what you think.

Posted by Snark_Needleton

and yet you keep talking to me... at least you stopped trying to be funny. That's a start.

The fact you are an old fuck doesn't mean you're any more credible

Got to love a newb... old? Not this guy...

Done with you now.

Posted by Snark_Needleton

LOL... Oh I think you'll be back... I think I've just added another member to my stalker list... Welcome aboard...

You're as tiresome today as ever.

"ever"?

which asswipe loser did this guy used to be?

which asswipe loser did this guy used to be?

Posted by eberly

Wow nice catch... completely missed that.

Snark, you know what's great about fucking losers like you who have to create new logins (either to escape your original loser ID or so that you'll finally have a poster to talk to you)? You douchebags always expose yourself... usually pretty quickly...

So are you gonna tell us who you are, or are we just going to see another really unfunny poster show up in the next few days and sadly never hear from Snarky again...

this seems as though it is akin to asking neil o'donnel how to win a superbowl.

wasn't it mccain that wouldn't criticize kerry, his dear friend, just four years ago in spite of his party edging him to just that?
yet mccain didn't attack in any strong manner.
kerry hasn't that character in him apparently.
politics and friends...?
not that i entirely disagree with kerry's remarks. he's makes some valid points.
but he should've given those remarks to someone who else who has, as of yet, not lost their credibility.

all the best.

"Kerry questions McCain's judgement"

This story is a joke right? Kerry's judgement has been unbelievably bad.

This story is a joke right? Kerry's judgement has been unbelievably bad.

Refute away:

'There's no violent history between Sunni and Shia.'
True or false?

'This is going to increase the stability of the Middle East.'
True or false?

'This (Iraq war) will be the best thing for America and the world in a long time.'
True or false?

The [focus] away from Afghanistan and al Qaeda and made America more safe.
True or false?

The Iraq war has strengthened Iran's power.
True or false?

McCain has a plan to stay in Iraq. Obama has a plan to get out.
True or false?

Silly rabbits, cunts are for tricks.

John Kerry is absolutely right!

John McCain should be in a retirement home right now playing bingo letting widowed women try and hit on him.

A 72 year old President....fucking ridiculous !!!

Sorry LIBS. Coming from Long Jaw, that doesn't hold any water.

What a joke, all these posts w/o anyone describing how the two canidates compare!!! This is not about Kerry, sorry to have asked your opinion John Kerry!

If McCain has no experience to be prez, John...tell us how much Barack has??? And compare and contrast that experience for us JK. I would say two do nothing jobs for inner city programs that produced nothing would amount to ZERO experience at anything. Doesn't even qualify him to hold towels for anyone in the men's room at the Congressional man's room......

Republicans are entertaining. Now "experience" is important!

John Kerry is a loser. John McCain is a loser. Barak is a Marxist, but not yet a loser. We're screwed any way you turn.

Riddle: John McCain and Barak Obama are on a plane. the plane crashes. Who survives?

America.

Kerry is certainly an expert on bad judgment. If McCain is so bad, why did Kerry offer him the Vice Presidency? (Or so Kerry says).

(Or so Kerry says).

Hm. Blast from the past:

The John McCain of 2004 is not even close to the John McCain of 2008.

My wife and I used to respect him. Until he turned into George W Bush II. That pic of him hugging Bush - the man who smeared him and cost him the GOP nomination in 2000 - is pitiful.

need TO HAVE A GOOD JUDGEMENT TO BE PRESIDENT? NOT REALLY. BUSH ELECTED TWICE....

The John McCain of 2004 is not even close to the John McCain of 2008

This is the silliest shit ever... John McCain hasn't changed. The Left just doesn't want him to have the title of a centrist and moderate going into the election because that would be bad for their candidate.

John McCain was the first choice of Democrats to be their Vice President less then 4 years ago... that means that they thought he was a better choice to run this country then every member of their party besides Kerry. McCain hasn't changed, you're all just a bunch of partisan hacks.

So far, not one single person has bothered to refute even one point that Kerry made about McCain.

See Yav's 10:56 post.

How about it, asshole rob?

FF for Rob.

How about it, asshole rob?

Posted by Dave

I think we can do without the childish namecalling, fuckhole....

'This is going to increase the stability of the Middle East.'
True or false?

Except for Iraq, where has the middle east destabalized because of Iraq? Further, the Iraq war is not over. Every war destabalizes the country where the war is taking place... when the war is over, if it is successful then the ME will be a more stable place because Hussein is gone, no more no fly zones, no more military ops like "Desert Fox," no more embargos, etc...

'This (Iraq war) will be the best thing for America and the world in a long time.'
True or false?

that's a stretch, but again its not over so the answer is undetermined.

The [focus] away from Afghanistan and al Qaeda and made America more safe.
True or false?

Just because the focus of americans and the media went to Iraq, does not mean that we aren't still fighting the taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. There are around 60K Allied forces in Afghanistan as well as the Afghan military. Every thread here about a Taliban resurgence is almost always followed up with a story of Taliban dying by the dozens...

The Iraq war has strengthened Iran's power.
True or false?

Yeah, I don't buy this... sorry... If Iraq's 2003 military was holding Iran in check then Iran is the very definition of a paper tiger. Further, the Israelis will probably be taking care of Iran in the near future.

McCain has a plan to stay in Iraq. Obama has a plan to get out.
True or false?

Posted by YAV

True-ish... During primary debates, only Dennis Kucinich said there would be no troops in Iraq by the end of his first term. While Obama has said he will begin withdrawing forces right away he has already hinted that may not happen either.

"The enthusiasm of Democrats for Mr. McCain, an Arizona Republican, is so high that even some who have been mentioned as possible Kerry running mates"

If he's not shooting somebody in the back, he's stabbing them there. Talk about extremes...The first one was a teenaged cripple, the last one is a geriatric cripple.

Why would anybody listen to a guy who had lower grades than George Bush?

So far, not one single person has bothered to refute even one point that Kerry made about McCain.

Kerry is exactly what the repubs need. I can see it now

"Obama was for troop withdrawal before he was against it"

"Obama was for public financing before he was against the money"

"Obama was a client of Rezko before he was against his money"

Obama was a student of Wright before he was against his church"

"So far, not one single person has bothered to refute even one point that Kerry made about McCain."

Point #1 from Kerry "John McCain ... has been wrong about every judgment he's made about the war"

McCain said the "Surge" would work and both Obama and Kerry said it would not. Even most Dems agree that the surge has been successful.

This proves that Kerry's first point is wrong.

There, happy?

Yes and Kerry left out the Surge since it was the right call and McCain was out on a limb calling for this strategy when everyone else was not.

And the Dems are admitting nothing about the surge being a success.

Obama made his point about the war in 2002 because that's what his constituents expected of him.

He is from a liberal district and they would have bashed him over the head if he said anything otherwise.

McCain said the "Surge" would work and both Obama and Kerry said it would not. Even most Dems agree that the surge has been successful.

Posted by FreddyK at 2008-07-07 03:16 PM

Your right.. the surge is working. So fucking what?

I want the $1 trillion dollars Bush has pissed away defending a country who couldn't give a flying fuck less what happens to America or anyone of us in it and if truth were to be spoken here want all of us Fucking Dead !!!

"The surge is working"... what a complete crock of propoganda bullshit.

"The Surge is working" USATRUEBLUE: Wake up ASSHOLE. It is WORKING. Stop reading the New York Slime and get your head out of your ass.

It's funny to me that people still listen when the Evil Tree speaks.

The John McCain of 2004 is not even close to the John McCain of 2008

This is the silliest shit ever... John McCain hasn't changed.

ROB THE A HOLE

He's for everything he was against in 2004.

McCain's no maverick anymore. He's doing his best to suck up to the conservatives and abandoning his stances that go back years.

"John McCain hasn't changed. "

He's even OLDER.

"The Surge is working" USATRUEBLUE: Wake up ASSHOLE. It is WORKING. Stop reading the New York Slime and get your head out of your ass.

Posted by ozzieoswald at 2008-07-07 07:04 PM |

HEY SHIT FOR BRAINS!!!...DO YOU READ ENGLISH ? I DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF THE SURGE IS WORKING !

The John McCain of 2004 is not even close to the John McCain of 2008

This is the silliest shit ever... John McCain hasn't changed. The Left just doesn't want him to have the title of a centrist and moderate going into the election because that would be bad for their candidate.

John McCain was the first choice of Democrats to be their Vice President less then 4 years ago... that means that they thought he was a better choice to run this country then every member of their party besides Kerry. McCain hasn't changed, you're all just a bunch of partisan hacks.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole

MacCain hasn't changed? Are you for real, Rob? Ordinarily you demonstrate knowledge of the facts, and occasionally (credit where credit is due) even MASTERY of them. But to say that McCain is the same guy (of course we are taling about his VIEWS, not his actual biomass - although that, too is technically new since thenm now that i think of it), is to deny the obvious changes of position since then.

Are you saying that McCain's views THEN were insincere? If so, that you are right that Kerry made huge mistake in trusting his judgment based on hsi record up until that point.

"The surge is working"... what a complete crock of propoganda bullshit.

Posted by USATrueandBlue7

Please follow the conversation. Several libs above asked for someone to refute just one thing Kerry had said. I did that. It shows that Kerry is full of it. You want your trillion dollars? I want my 6 trillion that you libs have spent on the "war on poverty" since the 60's. How is that war going? Has poverty decreased in the USA since you started the program? What is your exit strategy? Oh I already know the answer, spend even more money.

Kerry is ignoring history. The repubs have no problem promoting someone who lacks basic judgemental skills for the White House.

Come on you libs, answer FreddyK's comment on your 40+ year long, $6T War on Poverty...
BBBWWWWWAAAAAAAAHHHHHAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA!!!!

John Kerry... who's he? ...nothing but another crybaby, thumbsucking, bedwetting, military-hating, truth-hating loser.

ROFLMAO!!!!

Freddie,
Poverty has increased since Bush became president. But, of course, you knew that.

"Freddie,
Poverty has increased since Bush became president. But, of course, you knew that."

Posted by igmoramus

The poverty rate was decreasing dramatically during the 50's and early 60's and leveled off after you Democrats insttuted the war on poverty. Since that time it hasn't changed much at all. It went down slightly during the 90's and up slightly during the 2000's but not significantly.

here is the data:

Freddie,
To understand the war on poverty, you have to understand what war is. War is a conflict involving at least two rivaling factions.
Who are the combatants in this war? On one hand you have the liberals who are fighting against poverty. On the other hand you have the conservatives who are fighting for it.
Why? Because liberals think it is morally wrong to accumulate wealth by spreading poverty. Conservatives see nothing wrong with this concept; in fact, that's how they accumulate much of their wealth; by redistributing it away from the poor and middle class and giving it to the rich.
Your contention that liberals wasted $6 trillion fighting poverty is fundamentally dishonest. It doesn't take into account the real enemy and his victories. The real enemy in the war against poverty are the greedy who have to have it all and don't care how they get it. Their victories are many; Reganomics, globalization, corporate welfare, downsizing, outsourcing, union busting, and a sense of responsibility toward making a profit and absolutely nothing else. Every time they win it takes more effort and money to defeat poverty. But the beginning of the exit strategy starts when we acknowledge that there are those who profit from poverty. Will you acknowledge that, Freddy?

"Freddie,
To understand the war on poverty, you have to understand what war is. War is a conflict involving at least two rivaling factions.
Who are the combatants in this war? On one hand you have the liberals who are fighting against poverty. On the other hand you have the conservatives who are fighting for it. Will you acknowledge that, Freddy?"

Posted by igmoramus

No none of what you said is correct. You have the conservatives who are fighting against you liberals waisting money and not accomplishing anything, in fact as I showed you on the graph poverty leveled off after you libs started your "war". The term war for this spending was a liberal pr term not mine.

The liberals are not fighting anyting, just spending money and blowing smoke up the taxpayer's asses.

The point is you liberals have proven that you can't fight poverty with entitlement programs, you just make things worse.

So we ask again, since your programs have proven to be the biggest, most expensive failure in history what is your exit strategy?

Conservatives see nothing wrong with this concept; in fact, that's how they accumulate much of their wealth; by redistributing it away from the poor and middle class and giving it to the rich.

a liberal you are!!! you first assign a position to someone that doesn't exist. I am a conservative arguable and I dare you to show me that I have accumulated much of my wealth by the practice you have described. You first have to assume I'm wealth of course.

You don't have one single idea of what you are talking about. You are assinging a position of what some people truly have to all conservatives who you wrongly accuse of not giving a shit about poor people and actually want there to be more poor people.

your post is disgusting.

"I am a conservative arguable and I dare you to show me that I have accumulated much of my wealth by the practice you have described.

Posted by eberly at 2008-07-08 01:03 PM"

Well, at least some of your assests (i.e., the $692 in change you've begged for over the years) came from the poor or lower middle class who just felt sorry for you, Ebs.

You want your trillion dollars? I want my 6 trillion that you libs have spent on the "war on poverty" since the 60's. How is that war going? Has poverty decreased in the USA since you started the program? What is your exit strategy? Oh I already know the answer, spend even more money.

Posted by FreddyK at 2008-07-08 08:22 AM | Reply

When you read somthing as ignorant as that posted above by FreddyK you can unstand why America is in the shape it is in. The US National debt was $ 6 Trillion Dollars (in tsotal) when Bush took office 7-1/2 years ago and will hit $10 Trillion before he leaves office.

Now take a moment and put things into perspective.
It took the United States of America 230 Years to amass a $ 6 Trillion Dollar Debt and 8 years later under Bush it will have increased 40% or $4 Trillion dollars. But yet idiots like the one above somehow rationalize in their ostrich sized brains that its the liberals fault and social programs when in reality it is the frivolus and reckless spending of Conservatives thru Corporate welfare and Tax give aways that nearly destroyed us.

Take a moment and look at the attached graph and see what collectively Ronald Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II (The current CLUELESS jackass in thge White House have done to our economy and our country.

Freddy,
Your refusal to acknowledge that some people profit from poverty underscores your fundamental dishonesty.

Eberly,
I identified conservatives as those who fight for poverty because Freddy chose to frame his contention on Liberal/Conservative terms. And, yes, I have accused some of wanting more poor people. I stand by that statement.

Your post is idiotic.

Well, at least some of your assests (i.e., the $692 in change you've begged for over the years) came from the poor or lower middle class who just felt sorry for you, Ebs.

more assigning of a position. what else do you guys have???

I begged for something??? WTF are you talking about?

Oh, I have begged for something over the years......but leave my sex life out of this :-(

Every time they win it takes more effort and money to defeat poverty.

you can't defeat poverty.

Not in this country. I don't care how much money you throw at it.

"Posted by FreddyK at 2008-07-08 08:22 AM | Reply

When you read somthing as ignorant as that posted above by FreddyK you can unstand why America is in the shape it is in. The US National debt was $ 6 Trillion Dollars (in tsotal) when Bush took office 7-1/2 years ago and will hit BLAH BLAH BLAH"

Posted by USATrueandBlue7

Dear sir your reading comprehension is very poor. The discussion was not about debt but amount in the budget spent on these useless programs sponsored by you libs. But for the record our total debt would have been much less is we had not wasted these funds.

I agree this country is in trouble when people like you cannot stay on subject.

"Freddy,
Your refusal to acknowledge that some people profit from poverty underscores your fundamental dishonesty."

Posted by igmoramus

I acknowledge that! I also acknowledge that the sky is blue. People profit from all kinds of things.

Now will you please answer my question. How will you liberals get us out of this war on poverty and the constant wasteful spending?

6 trillion and counting,..........

your answer please!

"I begged for something??? WTF are you talking about?

Posted by eberly at 2008-07-08 01:28 PM"

In India? With that other old lady? Come on, Ebs! Try to keep up!

"Freddie,
Poverty has increased since Bush became president. But, of course, you knew that.

Posted by igmoramus'

Please also acknowledge that you wrong about the above as the graph I posted showed. Or are you that dishonest?

Thanks!

Freddy,
There's only one way out; to win the war, to eliminate poverty. Until we do it will always be a drain on our society.
We need to protect our jobs, make higher education affordable, level the economic playing field and above all discard the idea of greed as a virtue. If you want your 6 trill back I suggest calling Halliberton. They've got it.
But stop blaming those who fight against poverty for the fact that the war continues. That's dishonest. Give credit where credit is due.

There's only one way out; to win the war, to eliminate poverty.

You can't.

Until we do it will always be a drain on our society.

No it will just remain a drain forever.

Now, an honest liberal would just admit this and accept that it is a compassionate thing to do to feed, clothe, provide medical care, educate etc.... the poor in this country. After all, most of them are children....right?

Personally, I believe in continuing our support of people in poverty for that exact reason....compassion.

but it is utter ridiculous to believe that you can just throw money at poor people and shake your finger at them and say...."now stop being poor". You have to be honest with yourself FIRST about how most of them got into poverty.

***** The point is you liberals have proven that you can't fight poverty with entitlement programs, you just make things worse.
Posted by FreddyK ******

..........false.........

......the Western European countries, Australia, Canada ...who have the most anti-poverty entitlement programs have the highest standards of living in the world........HIGHER THAN THE US.....

......look at any country without anti poverty social supports......Pakistan...Mexic
o...Haiti....and they have the lowest standards of living in the world......

"Give credit where credit is due."

Posted by igmoramus

It's difficult to give credit for something that is a complete failure.

Human Development Index from Wilkipedia.

1 ▲ (1) Iceland ▲ 0.968
2 ▼ (1) Norway ▲ 0.968
3 ▬ (0) Australia ▲ 0.962
4 ▲ (2) Canada ▲ 0.961
5 ▼ (1) Ireland ▲ 0.959
6 ▼ (1) Sweden ▲ 0.956
7 ▲ (2) Switzerland ▲ 0.955
8 ▼ (1) Japan ▲ 0.953
9 ▲ (1) Netherlands ▲ 0.953
10 ▲ (6) France ▲ 0.952
11 ▬ (0) Finland ▲ 0.952
12 ▼ (4) United States ▲ 0.951

"......the Western European countries, Australia, Canada ...who have the most anti-poverty entitlement programs have the highest standards of living in the world........HIGHER THAN THE US....."

Posted by skizziks

There are only a handfull and none with the population and diversity of population that the US has. And I don't see anyone wanting to go to those countries, why?

Because they suck! Especially canada.

Dear sir your reading comprehension is very poor. The discussion was not about debt but amount in the budget spent on these useless programs sponsored by you libs.

Posted by FreddyK at 2008-07-08 02:23 PM |

My reading Comprehension is obviously a little better than your facts your facts:

I want my 6 trillion that you libs have spent on the "war on poverty" since the 60's.

Fucking Comical !

1 ▲ (1) Iceland ▲ 0.968 (nobody wants to go there)
2 ▼ (1) Norway ▲ 0.968 (nobody wants to go there)
3 ▬ (0) Australia ▲ 0.962 (nobody wants to go there)
4 ▲ (2) Canada ▲ 0.961 (cheap tippers)
5 ▼ (1) Ireland ▲ 0.959 (everybody left there)
6 ▼ (1) Sweden ▲ 0.956 (high suicide rate)
7 ▲ (2) Switzerland ▲ 0.955 (nobody wants to go there)
8 ▼ (1) Japan ▲ 0.953 (nobody wants to go there)
9 ▲ (1) Netherlands ▲ 0.953 (nobody wants to go there)
10 ▲ (6) France ▲ 0.952 (people visit but leave when they find out the french are pricks)

Finland ▲ 0.952 (2 hours of daylight in winter, great!)
12 ▼ (4) United States ▲ 0.951 (THe place everybody wants to go!!!!!!!!!!! because it is such a great country and would be even better if some of you liberals would go some place else, see above for great ideas)

Posted by skizzik

If you want your 6 trill back I suggest calling Halliberton. They've got it.

Halliberton could give $6 trillion (LOL) to the govt and the poor wouldn't benefit a bit.

**** There are only a handfull and none with the population and diversity of population that the US has. And I don't see anyone wanting to go to those countries, why?
Because they suck! Especially canada.

Posted by FreddyK *****

......standard of living is measured per capita.....
......so the size of the population is a red herring.....
.......and for blaming a low standard of living on "diversity", that shows your essential racism....

......as for those countries sucking.....I lived in Europe for a decade and also spent time in Canada...
......you have no idea what you are talking about.....
......you should get out of the trailer park more often.......
........we have to open our minds to learning from others......and not endlessly repeating that we are the best when we are in a precipitous decline......

as for those countries sucking.....I lived in Europe for a decade and also spent time in Canada...

where do you live now? did you live in any of those countries specifically?

......standard of living is measured per capita.....
......so the size of the population is a red herring.....
.......and for blaming a low standard of living on "diversity", that shows your essential racism....

......as for those countries sucking.....I lived in Europe for a decade and also spent time in Canada...
......you have no idea what you are talking about.....
......you should get out of the trailer park more often.......
........we have to open our minds to learning from others......and not endlessly repeating that we are the best when we are in a precipitous decline......

Posted by skizziks at 2008-07-08 03:39 PM |

Very well stated... Very articulate and to the point. BRAVO !!

........we have to open our minds to learning from others......and not endlessly repeating that we are the best when we are in a precipitous decline......

Posted by skizziks

It is idiots like you who have the decline.

I have never seen minds as closed as the so called liberals on this board.