Bush is one the best presidents in history, He will be remember right with the true Patriots right up there with Joe McCarthy...
~Ann the man

You don't need 3 Blackhawks and 100 GI's armed to the teeth to walk around most parts of Detroit.

But they still play better hockey in Detroit. I hear the Iraqi Olympic ice hockey team is a year or two away from dominance...

On topic, Coulter recognizes Bush's successes as so few in the media will do, lest they be scorned. She's a self-induced provocative lightning rod who needs to stir the pot to hold her place in the media spotlight. She's not my cup of tea based on her personality - though many of her points over the years have been on target.

On topic, Coulter recognizes Bush's successes as so few in the media will do,


LOL

Indeed as the 'vast' 20% of this nation see his [sic] "successes"

"You don't need 3 Blackhawks and 100 GI's armed to the teeth to walk around most parts of Detroit." -- AU

I notice you used the word "most". Yes, you are right, "most" areas of Detroit are probably safer than Baghdad.

In the '80s people used to joke around that Beirut was safer than Los Angeles. (Yeah! But Beirut's basketball team sucked!)

Ann is troll, too ~ where is Robby_Atom to troll along?

"safer than Detroit"

I'd rather not go there, either.

But ask McCain, he thinks Petraeus goes driving around in an unarmored Humvee, or Lindsey Graham, who chortles about getting three rugs for five bucks. What a pair of uninformed, gullible pimps.

"On topic, Coulter recognizes Bush's successes..."

Exactly, what "successes" are you refering to?

You can either go to Detroit or not.

Ann Coulter should/will go down as one of the least interesting journalists of our era.

Ann Coulter should/will go down as one of the least interesting journalists of our era.

Journalist, does she even claim that title?

**** You don't need 3 Blackhawks and 100 GI's armed to the teeth to walk around most parts of Detroit.
Posted by AMERICANUNITY ****

.....thats right.....one Blackhawk and a dozen armed guards are usually enough......

"Ann Coulter should/will go down"

When?
Who's the lucky girl?

*** Ann Coulter should/will go down as one of the least interesting journalists of our era.
Posted by sitdown ****

........I think its a stretch to call her a "journalist"......

.......maybe a "shameless party shill"...but not a journalist.......

.......if she is remembered at all, calling the 9/11 widows "whores", will put her in the same category as Goebbels,Mugabe and Comical Ali......

DAVE-
I think her primary point of successes in Bush's time was the lack of another 9/11 on US soil.

She's criticized Bush in the past... not the least of which was his Harriet Myers selection.

History will judge today's events. Bush has a number of faults/weaknesses, but you can't deny the fact that (as of today anyway) we haven't had another 9/11 on our soil since, well, 9/11.

DAVE-
Having said what I did at 4:21pm, in your opinion what would the impact be for the presidential election be if we did have another 9/11 prior to the election?

though many of her points over the years have been on target.

Posted by OohRah at 2008-06-14 02:01 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Which ones??

Larry Mohr

"What would be the impact be for the presidnetial election....?"

If there were another 911 prior to November? At minimum some in the Bush camp would be arguing for, at the very least, a postponement of scheduled elections. They would be the ones deciding how long that postponement would be, of course.

ZED-
What you suggest would be unprecedented. Let's assume, for argument's sake, that the election proceeds on schedule. The essence of my hypothetical was this: which candidate/party benefits more... and how will each candidate use that attack to his advantage?

It would be unprecedented. But it was also suggested by a Bush official in 2004, when there was no such attack.

But who benefits more? I'd hope a new blow on the level of 911 would be interpreted for what it was---That none of the crap we've done for seven years was successful and that line of thought should be dropped.

Frankly, a new 911 would breathe life into the notion Bush or those around him have been at the bottom of such events.

...........the voice of insanity.....in her own words......

*****We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.****

****We just want Jews to be perfected (converting them to Christianity)****

**** If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. ( I guess she doesn't consider herself a woman) ****

*****"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot." *****
______________________________
______________________________
____________
***I have never seen people enjoying their husband's deaths so much." -( on 9/11 widows.)****

*******We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens' creme brulee.****

********"We need to execute people like (John Walker Lindh) in order to physically intimidate liberals."*****

****"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." ****

.......she makes Hitler & Stalin sound reasonable.......

No it is You who is being disingenuous. Since Embassies and Consulates are deamed to have the same reverense as US SOil it is intellectually DIshonest to dismiss an attack upon oine of these places as anything other than an attack upon US Soil.

Larry Mohr

That should read US EMbassies and US Consulates.

Larry Mohr

"...Since Embassies and Consulates are deamed to have the same reverense as US SOil..." LARRY

Try selling that line of thought on the campaign trail, my friend.

While I haven't researched the technical standing of embassies or consulates, the practical application for Americans is that we haven't been attacked on our soil.

Again, we've had ships, consulates, embassies, etc hit in the past. It wasn't until 9/11 that we moved to a war footing. Do you dispute that?

Michael Reagan is a disgusting piece of shit who's only clain to fame is that his birth mother dropped him in a dumpster. Fuck Michael so-called Reagan. What a pig.

Try selling that line of thought on the campaign trail, my friend.

While I haven't researched the technical standing of embassies or consulates, the practical application for Americans is that we haven't been attacked on our soil.

Again, we've had ships, consulates, embassies, etc hit in the past. It wasn't until 9/11 that we moved to a war footing. Do you dispute that?

Posted by OohRah at 2008-06-14 04:58 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

You are being Intellectually Dishonest it reeks. Attacks upon US EMbassies and US COnsulates are attacks upon US SOil no matter where they are and to dismiss this is BULLSHIT. They are to be safe havens around the world where AMericans and foreigners alike can be declared upon US SOil. So You see OohRah while You try Your damnedest to state we have not been attacked upon US SOil since 9-11 is a Lie or if You don't know any better a mistake. BTW those who are responsible for the gaurding of these places are either the US STate department and or the USMC. Oh and I would declare when Bill Clinton fired those cruise missiles in Afghanistan during 1998 He was declaring defacto war footing.

Larry Mohr

Like I said, LARRY, take that to the campaign stump speech. I'm sure people will understand.

Americans care about domestic attacks. We'd largely turned a blind eye toward attacks elsewhere... and for the most part most countries didn't attack the US for fear we'd kick their butt. Do you deny that?

Given these attacks on our embassies, do you favor we go to war with all the nations in which those attacks occured? If not, what should be done?

Since terrorist attacks are Criminal Acts and not acts of war. I would institute Interpol and go through the proper Law Enforcement channels.

Larry Mohr

I must be missing things, Ann -- why don't you pass the KoolAid?

(Sick bitch!)

Ann's article conveniently omitted the Anthrax-by-mail attacks, still unsolved, but never mentioned by her ilk.

The rest of her "article" was just laughable.

Ann Coulter, is a sick BITCH, she should be pitied not taken serious. I believe that she(IF SHE IS A SHE), has taken to much hormone shots an she may believe that all it will take for her to grow a PENIS!! God must have a wild sense of humor, Tim Russert dies of a Heart Attack, an this Bitch get to breath our AIR, what a waste.....

Ann's article conveniently omitted the Anthrax-by-mail attacks, still unsolved, but never mentioned by her ilk.
SAMBARBER

The site whatreallyhappened.com has something on those Anthrax letters?

When she says, "It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq.... Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country. ...", doesn't she realize what service people concluded a long time ago -- (1) 99% of Al Qaida and 100% of bin Laden's closest circle were in Kandahar and Tora Bora, not Iraq; (2) our taking the eye off the ball allowed that network to disperse with bin Laden seeking refuge along with wealthy benefactors in the autonomous Waziri regions of Pakistan; (3) by not concluding the fight against Al Qaida, but by conflating Iraq's secular Baathist regime with the threat from Al Qaida, we continued to give aid and succor to Al Qaida and bin Laden's coterie, and we dangerously over-reached our strategic and tactical capabilities by choosing to fight in what would inevitably become a guerrilla, inner-city asymmetric conflict against a multitude of small para-military resistance fighters; and(4) by doing the previous, and not preparing our troops adequately fro teh psychological and military strains of Middle Eastern occupation and inevitable kind of war that followed, we allowed the situation in Iraq to devolve until the internal conflict became a proving-ground for an array or guerrilla and terrorist tactics.

What a nitwit!!

History will judge today's events. Bush has a number of faults/weaknesses, but you can't deny the fact that (as of today anyway) we haven't had another 9/11 on our soil since, well, 9/11.

You've got to be kidding me.

I'd call Ann a cunt, but she doesn't actually have one.

I don't buy the argument that since there have been no major terrorist attacks on the us homeland since 9-11 that is some sort of measure of success for the Bush administration. It's like saying that the US lives and interests, and those of our allies, that have been attacked overseas are some how worth less than those in the 50 states.

There had been not terrorist attacks on the US homeland any where near the scale of those on 9-11 before 9-11 either. To judge the Bush administration because something horrible that never happened before they came into office only happened once while they were in office is not a great endorsement.

I'm guessing Coulter is already preparing an article to run at the end of this Hurricane season praising Bush because he prevented another Katrina scale disaster on the US homeland during the remainder of his Presidency? Congratulations Mr. President, you only had one major US city flattened on your watch.

A little adjustment to that last post.

What I should have said was:"Congratulations Mr. President, you only had one major US city flattened on your watch that your administration failed to respond immediately to and with every available resource while people starved and drowned.

" This is patently false and I have shown You a couple times in the past how so very wrong that You are on this topic. "

Larry, the topic is about On American Soil, not the Middle East. Oh and I should also add the one about Greece.

I think the best way to deal with people like the pundit discussed is to ignore them. She is beneath responding to.

US Embassies and US Consulates ARE American Soil no matter where on earth they are at.

Larry Mohr

Clinton holds the record for no attacks on US soil.

I guess we're lucky Bush didn't let them attack us twice. It was hard enough for him to cover up for them, and let their leader run free the last time, I guess.

Laughing all the way to the bank again. Her attitude is that if people want to give her money for being outrageous, she'll take it. You can hardly blame her. The fault, if fault there is, lies with us not her.

Bush, of course, is among the most useless and damaging presidents we have ever had. That's why she says the opposite.

Pay no attention to Coulter- she's just writing whatever comes into her head to make a few bucks, so that she can finish up her sex change.

Save your money, honey. You need to get that Adam's apple shaved down, and you seriously need more estrogen.

I'm not sure if having a vagina will do you any good or not, though- a large part of the vagina's mystique is what it's attached to. In your case, that may be a stumbling block to your ambitions.

Clinton holds the record for no attacks on US soil.

I guess we're lucky Bush didn't let them attack us twice. It was hard enough for him to cover up for them, and let their leader run free the last time, I guess.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Actually, the 1993 WTC bombing happened a few weeks after Clinton took office.

The difference between him and Bush is that Clinton caught ALL the bombers and perpetrators - going as far as Pakistan to catch the last one.

Bush, as we all know, attacked the WRONG guy and STILL hasn't caught the heads of Al Qaeda.

a large part of the vagina's mystique is what it's attached to.

I could make a joke about Coulter's being attached to little more than a life support system, but I won't

Does anyone REALLY believe that this administration's policies have prevented another attack from Islamist terrorists, with-in the U.S.? Do they really believe that a continuation of those same policies will lessen the threat?

While few would hope for another attack, too believe that George Bush is the reason there hasn't been one, with our porous borders and ports, is simply delusional. While I'm sure most of our law enforcement have done the best they can with what they have to prevent it, the type of sick criminals that are capable of such an attack WILL do something again.

In Coulters mind, I doubt if U.S. lives are more important than Coulter.

mAnn is trolling again with some more outrageous and unsubstantiated shit?

Quelle farking suprise.

* YAWN *

Is anybody still taking her shit seriously?

Be Well.

/stage left.

The difference between him and Bush is that Clinton caught ALL the bombers and perpetrators - going as far as Pakistan to catch the last one.

Bush, as we all know, attacked the WRONG guy and STILL hasn't caught the heads of Al Qaeda.
~AMERICANUNITY



Which Raises the Question...



Where is Osama bin Laden?

This cute American douchbag pried her way into the media by claiming to be a "Constitutional Lawyer" during the Simpson media fiasco. Reminds me of Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley. Remember the girl that wiped shit on herself and jumped into a garbage can claiming a racial attack.

Coulters selective memory and boldface lies, like her Constitutional expertise, is laughable.

She must not have read Kucinich's Articles of Impeachment which seeks to put our moral compass back on track. Or the 28 domestic attacks by armed Moslems across the country (our Government pretends they are not terrorist attacks). She forgets millions dead, trillions wasted, hundreds of thousands falsely imprisoned, tens of thousands tortured, less than ten convictions some of whom were framed. Her analysis of the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan is wrong and juvenile.

Where is OJ, where is Osama?

AU

Clinton still holds the record for no attacks on US soil. Longer than Bush. From the first attack on the WTC until the end of his term is longer than the span from 911 to now or the end of Bushs term.

However, I don't find this record to be anything to brag about by either Clinton or Bush---not when Americans are dying for nothing in a foreign country. Attacks on Americans and American lives lost count no matter if they are on American soil or not.

Whatsleft

You are exactly correct. The only reason there hasn't been another attack on US soil is because these criminals have simply not wanted to attack again. Nothing Bush has done has prevented any attacks. Our borders are porous, ships are unloaded without inspection, but taking your shoes off in the airport will keep us safe from attack.

Having said what I did at 4:21pm, in your opinion what would the impact be for the presidential election be if we did have another 9/11 prior to the election?

Posted by OohRah at 2008-06-14 04:24 PM |

The problem is that Boy Blunder ignored intelligence and let the first attack happen. W will not fare well when historians analyze his Presidency.

BB

I understand where you're coming from....

Clinton hunted every single surviving bomber down.

Bush? Ah, we know the answer to that one don't we?

He didn't even do anything when the CIA sent a staffer to Crawford in August 2001 but tell the buy he covered his ass. Then he went back to clearing brush.

Clinton set up the antiterrorism office as you know....

How Coulter views GW Bush as a President is and will forever remain insignificant.

What the American people really want to know and remains the most important question regarding Ann Coulter is...

"Does she have male genitalia to go along with her Adams apple?"

We continue to humor this grotesque parody of "journalism," don't we? Her swings at even reasonable rightie commentary grow wilder with each utterance, and our most doctrinaire bush-natics just keep on standing up and saluting. herm

"Where is Osama bin Laden?"


Posted by Zap



Trader Vic's; Pina colada; Perfect hair ...



honest

Coulter discovered a few years ago that "talkin' shite" (as they say in Dublin) paid a lot better than being a third-rate lawyer, her other career choice.

We can expect this stuff from her on a regular basis. Probably some more death threats, too. She likes those. Scares the Libs. Big tough Ann.

The fact that she is saying this should give pause to all.

BBob,

but taking your shoes off in the airport will keep us safe from attack.

They can't even keep the baggage inspectors from stealing stuff out of my checked luggage. How can anyone seriously believe they can stop all terror attacks?

Bush has a number of faults/weaknesses,

Posted by oorah


No freakin' way-dude!




Did you just say something about the remote possibility of water being WET?

-pause- ok, I can get on with my evening. If you can't detect a plane off it's flight path heading into the center of a major metropolis, not to mention 2 of them, then anything they force us to do at airports is a complete and utter waste of time and effort - as was the idiot invasion of Iraq. If I ever see that piece of shit so-called "president" on the street, it'll take a hell of a lot more than a couple secret service agents to keep me from smacking him right in his gutless pussy.

I read the title of this thread and nearly lost it.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahahahahahahahahahahah......

I mean I know she is an attention seeking troglodyte, but c'mon.

The anorexic ghoul must have another book coming out. I keep her last one in the bathroom to use when I run out of toilet paper. Oh, I read it first, then realized that her disingenuous screed was better suited for it's current use.

What about all the other Presidents before that prevented a terrorist attack on US soil? This is one of the emptiest, stupidest arguments I've heard in support of Bush. Who was the dipshit in the President's seat when the big terrorist attack on U.S. soil happened? Oh, it was Bush.

Coulter has cemented herself as irrelevant.

Larry Mohr, you are an intellectual ignoramus. That cannot be defended by you as this statement speaks to all your speech. Same for anyone who attempts to defend your silly stickling point. You are not even worth the time it would take to explain the concept of "American Soil" in foreign countries, much less the legal description. No mater how many times you state and restate your position, you are wrong. Any attempt to try to explain away such ignorance only illustrates the fact.

You are also a huge bore, me I am just an everyday asshole and I am good at being one. I enjoy being one too. If I never have to read you or Ann on this site again it will be too soon.

Jack Ramig

BIGRAMIG...thanks for saying what I was thinking but did not bother wasting the effort to put this A.H. (Larry Mohr) in his rightful place.

Some people think they have an edge when they are as dull as the end of your X#*^@ if you know what I mean.

Since he sounds like a Clintonista, I just wonder if he has ever considered that our current President at least knows the meaning of "IS" even though he is from Texas and a rancher / cowboy type?

Most of these pricks don't have anything else better to do than to spew their garbage on this page thinking the terrorists will just get amused at their dumb-ass comments. We all have such crap to keep us amused without these imbeciles putting their two cents in. Most of these jerks are totally irrelevant anyway.

If these idiots want to defend the prospects of living safer in Detroit than in Iraq, I just wonder if anyone has bothered to check the statistics. It is now safer in Iraq than Detroit based on the death rate and murders on record.

These people probably still think there is a clause in our constitution which says we have to defend the rights of all people who live in the continental boundaries of the United States. Well, if you are an anti-American, don't appreciate your President, or don't consider the fact that he is your President, then don't count on my support. I would just as soon see you fall off the face of the earth.

"The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish." (Robert Jackson)

"It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether secondary importance, and that in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things." Theodore Roosevelt

"The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it."
-- George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)

shalom:rwb

BB, Jimmy Carter didn't believe so.

Jack Ramig

History will judge today's events. Bush has a number of faults/weaknesses, but you can't deny the fact that (as of today anyway) we haven't had another 9/11 on our soil since, well, 9/11.

Posted by OohRah at


I was going to the end of thread to tell you that libs here would deny and I see that good old larry came through right on cue......

and just like when I said this for some time, he likes to 'skip over' the parts where we said on our soil and he will deny that too and call the embassies 'our soil' and while he might be technically correct, its not what you or I were talking about, is it?

HISTORY WILL DECIDE BUSH"S LEGACY and it wont be the LIBERAL history class that tells us about reagan and the cold war and all of that.....
liberals will tell you since they are so fuckin smart and we are so fuckin stupid that they and ONLY THEY know what the history books will say about bush in oh say.....40 or 50 years.....heres hoping that places like israel will be there to HAVE history books.

How's Chimpus Minimus doing in regards to capturing the anthrax killer? That was on US soil and was after 9/11. As usual, Chimpy's rim lickers overlook that terrorist act in a feeble attempt to polish the turd from Crawford's pathetic record.

I also wonder if Coulter is still spouting that things are going "swimmingly" in Afghanistan.

These right wingers are so desperate it's not even funny anymore. They know the score. They know they fucked up but they lack the balls to come to terms with it. I believe in 20 Years it's gonna get worse for them. I should pity them but I don't.

Larry Mohr

Well, seeing that Bush ignored the warnings and allowed the PDB alerting him that Bin Laden was determined to strike in the U.S., allowing the first 9/11 doesnt seem like such a great track record. But I will give Bush one kudo.....we havent been invaded by aliens from another planet. I give all the credit to Bush on this and I am sure that our occupation of Iraq has something to do with it.

THIS FOR THE DRUDGE REPORT: WHERE IS THE REPORT ON SEN DODD AND FELLOW DEMS THAT GOT SPECIAL DEALS ON MORTGAGES. DID GEORGE SOROS TELL YOU TO COOL IT. WE CERTAINLY HAVE TO DEFEND OUR FRIENDS IN THE DEM PARTY.

"but you can't deny the fact that (as of today anyway) we haven't had another 9/11 on our soil since, well, 9/11"

The companion piece to that is the worst terrorist attack the United States ever suffered took place on this fool's watch.

Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US
PDB - August 6, 2001

What, exactly, did Bush to address that issue? I mean, other than clear some brush at the former pig farm he calls "home"?

"But I will give Bush one kudo.....we havent been invaded by aliens from another planet. I give all the credit to Bush on this and I am sure that our occupation of Iraq has something to do with it.
Posted by SnidelyWhiplash at 2008-06-15 10:00 AM"

Don't tell Buffalo Bob, it'll break his heart.

the history books will say about bush in oh say.....40 or 50 years.....heres hoping that places like israel will be there to HAVE history books.
~Bush lackey 2

WTF is Chimpy planning to run for Prime Minister of Israel next?

Or is this a remix of the trumped up reasons floated, denied, and now refloated for invading a Iraq.

Long after we're all gone. Just before the Sun runs out of hydrogen in its core -- that's about 5 billion years from now, based on Vernon's calculations -- and Father Sun becomes a Red Giant that envelops the Earth, as Humanity enters the Omega Phase and the pages in the revisionist historians' book turn black on the edges and start to curl, people will say, "That George Bush, whataguy!" I'm not bullshitting you. You'll just wait and see.
~Rightwads

" This is patently false and I have shown You a couple times in the past how so very wrong that You are on this topic. "

Larry, the topic is about On American Soil, not the Middle East. Oh and I should also add the one about Greece.

Posted by KBM at 2008-06-14 07:02 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

The fucking point is the world isn't a safer place since Bush Co. brought us the "fightem over there so we don't have to fightem over here war"

You guys who are trying to defend this so called president look like a one legged man in an ass kicking contest.

But by all means, continue.

Gore Vidal is probably right: It'll be at least a century before this country overcomes the damange wrought by George Bush. If it can be overcome.

Sorry, Mr. President, But Your Legacy Is More Awful Than You Think
By Bob Cesca

Rest assured, Mr. President, that despite what you told the Times Online today you won't be remembered solely as a war mongering president.

"Look, I think that in retrospect, you know, I could have used a different tone."
Different tone? Ya think?

War mongering is a significant aspect of your legacy, but I think we can conclude, and without much debate, that your legacy will also be one of criminality, failure and a degree of incompetence rarely achieved by any American president, much less one whose deficit of character is rivaled only by his nearly unprecedented lack of humility in the face of his unprecedented roster of inadequacies.

Sorry.

As it turns out, you won't have much control over your legacy and the history of your administration anyway. You might have some cursory input, but no-one really takes you seriously anymore and anything you put forth will be taken as just another work of fiction; another bit of propaganda.

Your legacy will ultimately be written by those of us who have been actively documenting your presidency in real time -- millions of voices authoring the narrative of your awful regime and preserving it with digital clarity one trespass at a time.

And everywhere we look, we can plainly observe your smirking, affectless footprint.

Death, poverty, war, pain, ignorance, blind patriotism, joblessness, and abandoned homes. And guess what? We're writing it down on the Internets. Your history, Mr. President, is being written at this very moment by those of us who are watching our homes collapse in value and our friends and relatives sent to places like Ramadi and Fallujah and, in some cases, Walter Reed or worse. Your history, Mr. President, isn't going to be settled and published decades from now. It's being published immediately and without the fog of memory to obscure the ugly details.

These ugly details are exhaustively researched and easily accessible.

And as they congeal into a single eight-year narrative, it's my hunch that every tragedy experienced during this dark ride will be regarded as a means to a specific end: your election to a second term and the election of successors who will carry on with your sinister tradition. The centerpiece of this tradition -- the throughline of your presidential narrative -- has been, simply put, endless war for the sake of re-election.

In fact (and contrary to your present lamentation) you wanted war even before you took office. War, by your own definition, would all but guarantee a second presidential term. You told your pre-2000 autobiographer, Mickey Herskowitz:

"One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief... My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it...If I have a chance to invade...if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency."
Four years later, as you ramped up your re-election campaign, you told Tim Russert:

"I'm a war president. I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with war on my mind."
You didn't sound ashamed of your tone back then -- when you were running for your second term. Everything you managed to accomplish during your presidency was directed towards maintaining this manufactured "war president" faade. Without it, you would have been either defeated in 2004 or impeached a long time ago.

Yuck...I just vomitted in my own mouth. Coulter claims Bush has prevented terrorist attacks on US soil. WRONG!! Bush failed to prevent the largest terrorist attack ever on US soil, Sept. 11, 2001. His record against terrorism is 0-1.

"LARRYMOHR" GIVE ME MO!

"Doc Saris" "Gore Vidal is probably right"
I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT EVEN AS A LIBERAL YOU QOUTE THE BIGGEST LIBERAL ASSHOLE IN OUR TIME. This ASSHOLE couldn't get the facts straight if his life depended on it!

I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT EVEN AS A LIBERAL YOU QOUTE THE BIGGEST LIBERAL ASSHOLE IN OUR TIME.
Posted by ozzieoswald

Well, considering that this thread is about the biggest Conservative asshole of our time, I'd say that was fair play.

Coulter and Bush are pimples on the asshole of life. Gore Vidal a giant they'll quote in history classes - as long as here are history classes. Not very long if GOP rule continues ... herm

we havent been invaded by aliens from another planet. Posted by SnidelyWhiplash at 2008-06-15 10:00 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

well I have to believe this EXCEPT that there are several here who I have doubts about.....lol


and please.......gore vidal will always be seen as the pompous east coast elite that he portrays.....
thats not to say that he isnt a good writer, but his opinions dont always match his writing ability.

& triple of bl2's...

What little credibility she had is surely blown to hell!!!!

Rachael Maddow makes Ann Coulter look womanly.

Ann is the greatest he/she of all time. Chicks with Dicks!

Rachael Maddow makes Ann Coulter look womanly.

Neither one of them can shut up. You'd think they had something important to say.

I see she's back off her meds again.

Skanky fucking crack whore.

The Iraq war has been a stunning success.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That MAnn is a real cut up. I had no idea she was such a comic genius.
And so wily too! Trying to connect 9/11 with Iraq yet again.
Even The Boy Blunder has given up that charade.

OK, I admit it! I love Ann Coulter!

She'd kill me in a debate (as she would every liberal wannabe loudmouth on this board) and I don't always agree with her... but, she's brilliant and she's exactly right about Bush.

For all the whining and sniveling about Gitmo, Iraq, Cheney, and etc.. Bush has beaten the crap out of the Bin Laden boys and despite their best efforts, has thwarted more terrorist attacks on the US.

Keeping us safe from attack.. is the FIRST priority of a president.. the rest of it would be meaningless except for that..

Herm At: Your right, Gore Vidal is a gaint, a gaint ASSHLOE!

Herm A: I'm sure Gore Vidal will be quoted for years to come, ASSHOLE U were all you fuck up liberal pray.

"Herm At: Your right, Gore Vidal is a gaint, a gaint ASSHLOE! Herm A: I'm sure Gore Vidal will be quoted for years to come, ASSHOLE U were all you fuck up liberal pray."

Let's have a contest. Anyone who can translate this gets a dinner date with Coulter. Anyone who can translate it without spelling or syntax error gets a a BJ from (m)Ann for dessert. herm

For all the whining and sniveling about Gitmo, Iraq, Cheney, and etc.. Bush has beaten the crap out of the Bin Laden boys and despite their best efforts, has thwarted more terrorist attacks on the US.


Keeping us safe from attack.. is the FIRST priority of a president.. the rest of it would be meaningless except for that..

Posted by nmg_no


FF

glad you think our security and the safety of americans is so funny.....

nmg_no wrote:
"She'd kill me in a debate (as she would every liberal wannabe loudmouth on this board) and I don't always agree with her... but, she's brilliant and she's exactly right about Bush."

Wow, what a post. You're either just trying to be an obnoxious agent provocateur like Ann, or you're just a moron. Probably both.

"but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years"

Considering that prior to Bush's presidency it had to have been over 100 years since the US mainland was attacked, the seven years thing really isn't that impressive a record.

Bush couldn't have screwed this country over worse if he were trying (and I'm not so sure he wasn't). Anyone who thinks Bush was even a decent president (or human being for that matter) is a moron.

When the far left is saying he's the worst ever (or among them) and the far right is saying he's among the best (or vice versa), to me that says somewhere amongst the middle and probably did more good then bad... just like I think of Bill Clinton.

Bush is not amongst the likes of Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Reagan, Jefferson and some others, but he's also not sharing company with Buchanan, Hoover, Nixon (Though if Nixon had served out his term without being an idiot, he wouldn't be in this list), Johnson, Carter and others.

We've had a pretty good economy with low unemployment for 7 years... in the aftermath of 9/11 everyone was sure we were going to get hit again but we haven't... Overall the country has moved forward and that's a good thing.

***** When the far left is saying he's the worst ever (or among them) and the far right is saying he's among the best (or vice versa), to me that says somewhere amongst the middle ......

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole ******

......89% of Americans feel he should be impeached......

........thats pretty one sided .........

***** I'm fucking embarassed for you...
Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole ******

.......don't be......he never fooled me...I never voted for him.......

......now..... you on the other hand..........

"but he's also not sharing company with Buchanan, Hoover, Nixon (Though if Nixon had served out his term without being an idiot, he wouldn't be in this list), Johnson, Carter and others"

Sure he is. The decision to invade Iraq was one of the most foolish and costly ever: 4,000 soldiers dead, hundreds of billions wasted and it distracted us from real national security goals. And for what? To mitigate an imaginary threat. Althought now we have the new excuse of bringing democracy to backward ass people who hate us and don't want it (which is now forcing us to stay in that shithole forever). Even if you can rationalize the initial decision to invade, there is no justifying the fact that we invaded without a complete plan. The Bush administration's outright refusal to think this thing through is unforgivable if you care at all about the lives of those who were sent over there.

Unless you are in the defense industry or retarded, you have to recognize the whole thing as a giant disaster.

.......don't be......he never fooled me...I never voted for him.......

......now..... you on the other hand..........

Posted by skizziks


Who is talking about elections here? You think a MSNBC online vote is a scientific poll and means that 89% of Americans really want the president impeached... You're an idiot.

The decision to invade Iraq was one of the most foolish and costly ever: 4,000 soldiers dead

So in your opinion Lyndon Johnson must be the worst president in the history of the nation given that Vietnam lead to the deaths of over 60,000 Americans?

Iraq was poorly run for too long, and that will always be a stain on the Presidents administration... but there have been plenty of Presidents who were worse, and plenty more who just flat out did nothing... they all rank beneath Bush.

AP: Official says hundreds of Taliban take over villages in Afghanistan, NATO moves in troops

Wonder what's going to happen to those hundreds of Taliban...

Bush is ... also not sharing company with Buchanan, Hoover, Nixon (Though if Nixon had served out his term without being an idiot, he wouldn't be in this list), Johnson, Carter and others.

We've had a pretty good economy with low unemployment for 7 years... in the aftermath of 9/11 everyone was sure we were going to get hit again but we haven't... Overall the country has moved forward and that's a good thing.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole at 2008-06-16 09:06 AM |

The real historical evaluation of any President isn't written until all of the people who voted for or against him are dead; however, by contemporary evaluations you'd be hard pressed to find any objective observer who'd be favorable toward Bush. His closest historical comparison is likely to be Harding. Bush will be less remembered for stopping a second 9/11 than he will be for being asleep at the switch for the first 9/11.

So in your opinion Lyndon Johnson must be the worst president in the history of the nation given that Vietnam lead to the deaths of over 60,000 Americans?

Iraq was poorly run for too long, and that will always be a stain on the Presidents administration... but there have been plenty of Presidents who were worse, and plenty more who just flat out did nothing... they all rank beneath Bush.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole


LBJ is almost up (or down:>) there with Bush the younger, but at least he passed the Civil Rights act...leading to Obama perhaps today...?

Produce one person who wouldn't kick this woman in her balls and I'll downgrade her from cunt to royal dumb bitch!

"So in your opinion Lyndon Johnson must be the worst president in the history of the nation given that Vietnam lead to the deaths of over 60,000 Americans?"

I wasn't around at the time but it doesn't exactly make him a great one now does it?

"and plenty more who just flat out did nothing... they all rank beneath Bush."

Doing nothing is better than aggressively pushing policies that fuck us. You seem to want to gloss over the fact that Iraq was unnecessary and negligently planned.

Bill Clinton did nothing with his presidency. He was a bad president. But he was infinitely better than Bush.

Bill Clinton did nothing with his presidency. He was a bad president.

Well actually Sully, Bill Clinton:

LEFT OFFICE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVAL RATING OF ANY PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Bush will most likely leave with the worst.

BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE. OK?

I read this sophomoric bullshit from the blind boys (and girls)and I cease to wonder what the fuck has happened to this country.

Does no one think independently anymore? Even those of you that are right and left wing intellectuals show yourself ill.

Left; It's you fault
Right; no it your fault

Both; hey look a burgular is taking our TV

Left It's you fault
Right no it's your fault

Burgular; I love it when they argue, where can I pawn this TV?

"Bill Clinton did nothing with his presidency. "

I wouldn't call moving large deficits to near-surplus budgets nothing.

It sure beats our current alternative.

Bush will be less remembered for stopping a second 9/11 than he will be for being asleep at the switch for the first 9/11.

Posted by Seabiscuit


Bush will be remembered for being "asleep at the switch" for 9/11 as much as Lincoln is remembered for being asleep at the switch for Ft. Sumter. Objective observers as you call them, aren't going to blame Bush for an attack that took place just 8 months into his first term, when the plan for 9/11 had been prepared and the training and infiltration into America took place years earlier...

Bill Clinton did nothing with his presidency. He was a bad president.

Posted by Sully


Both false.

Clinton did a lot of good during his presidency, and was a good president.

He should have been more proactive with Al Qaeda, but that's 20/20 hindsight... Given the mentality up until September 11, 2001, you can't really blame anyone for the attack except the attackers.

"LEFT OFFICE WITH THE HIGHEST APPROVAL RATING OF ANY PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Bush will most likely leave with the worst.

BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE. OK?"

I said he was infinitely better than Bush.

That doesn't change the fact that Clinton was more into being a celibrity than he was being a leader.

And what do I care for approval ratings? The population of this country re-elected Bush. Their credibility when it comes to judging the performance of presidents is lacking at best.

Bush will be remembered as the Hoover of the 21st Century. He will also be remembered as a war criminal and will represent shame in American history. Coulter will not be remembered at all.
Why I even posted in this thread is a mystery to me, I normally don't even dignify that pretender by acknowledging her existence.

"He should have been more proactive with Al Qaeda, but that's 20/20 hindsight... "

Actually, at the time he was ignoring those attacks I was saying that if we keep ignoring these people they are eventually going to force us to pay attention and it won't be pretty when they do.

So it isn't 20/20 hindsight for me to say that Clinton ignoring Al Queda had dire consequences. Anyone who was paying to attention to what was going on knew it would.

I'm really not trying to derail this thread into a Clinton bash. Bush is immeasurably worse.

Bush will be remembered as the Hoover of the 21st Century.

You know what... if the past 7 years is the worst we can expect for the next 92 years, this is going to be a kick ass century. Let's hope you're right.

Bush is immeasurably worse.

Posted by Sully


Reading your posts, its easily read that you think Clinton ignoring Al Qaeda lead to 9/11... but you still think Bush is immeasurably worse? You're not making much sense....

It is amazing with the hatred of Bush--some folks can't even acknowledge the possibility that Bush did something right and there hasn't been another attack on our soil.

Get out of the fish bowl!- and look inside of it!

"Reading your posts, its easily read that you think Clinton ignoring Al Qaeda lead to 9/11... but you still think Bush is immeasurably worse? You're not making much sense...."

Bush has eight months of ignoring Al Queda in there too. The USS Cole was attacked towards the end of Clinton's term and Bush took office and pretending it didn't happen (just like Clinton did) so he gets an assist on 9/11. It did happen under his watch.

The unnecessary and ill-planned war in Iraq has been more costly to the US than 9/11 - by any objective measure you care to use. More Americans dead. More costly. Distracted us from our real enemies. And may yet deliver an oil rich country to the extremists.

Plus Bush had that whole pathetic response to Katrina and let through every piece of pork that crossed his desk. As many have pointed out, Clinton was at least fiscally responsible.

Clinton didn't cause 9/11. He just did nothing to prevent it. Bush actually caused a bigger disaster in Iraq and has other negatives going for him.

"Bush Among Greatest Presidents"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT

New Orleans has a system of levees in place that are supposed to hold water back. If that retarded Governer lady and the Black Mayor ( no doubt a drug user) payed attention to the maintenence of these levees and invested the capitol needed to upkeep them, (rather than spend the money on booze and cocaine or whatever) Katrina should not have been a problem.. IT WAS NOT THE HURRICANE, wind damage etc. ITSELF that led to disaster YOU DOLTS -It was the ensuing flood when the levees failed! SO WHAT should Bush have done when he heard a hurricane was coming to New Orleans??? Should he have used his executive power to stop the hurricane???
dumbfucks. Should he scramble the military down to New Oleans because his crystal ball told him the levees were going to fail?

WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ! ???

"Bush Among Greatest Presidents"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT

Posted by crescentwindx at 2008-06-16 11:52 AM | Reply

Funny ain't it?? Too bad they really believe this shit. Deluded BIG TIME.

Larry Mohr

The unnecessary and ill-planned war in Iraq has been more costly to the US than 9/11

Without 9/11, there would be no war in Iraq... no one would have signed onto a preemptive war in Iraq, and it certainly wouldn't have had the approval of Democratic leadership if not for 9/11.

yeah that Minnesota bridge collapsed - Fuckin BUSH GODAMMIT!!!!

And look how that FUCKER Bush let all those Chinese die in that earthquake!!! BASTARD!!!!

Funny ain't it?? Too bad they really believe this shit. Deluded BIG TIME.

Larry Mohr

I'm still waiting for the day Ann Coulter writes a book titled "Just Joking, I'm a Liberal!"

Without 9/11, there would be no war in Iraq... no one would have signed onto a preemptive war in Iraq, and it certainly wouldn't have had the approval of Democratic leadership if not for 9/11.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole

hence the plan...

"Without 9/11, there would be no war in Iraq... no one would have signed onto a preemptive war in Iraq, and it certainly wouldn't have had the approval of Democratic leadership if not for 9/11."

Going to war against Iraq was not an inevitable response to being attacked by people located in Afghanistan. Yes, without 9/11 this retarded idea would have been shot down but it is still Bush's policy and he deserves 100% of the blame for it.

"Clinton didn't cause 9/11. He just did nothing to prevent it

sully

right...like he could have...lol"

Those of us who choose to deal with the reality of 9/11 know that it was entirely preventable.

I am not going to entertain your conspiracy talk. Its been done a thousand times over.

"SO WHAT should Bush have done when he heard a hurricane was coming to New Orleans??? Should he have used his executive power to stop the hurricane???
dumbfucks. Should he scramble the military down to New Oleans because his crystal ball told him the levees were going to fail?

WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ! ???"

At a minimum, even if you assume the US presidency doesn't require any forethought - That he didn't wait days to mobilize a reasonable federal response once the fact that the city was a disaster became common knowledge.

In reality, that New Orleans could easily be wiped out by a hurricane was not a secret and people told Bush of the potential disaster as the storm was approaching. So your crystal ball question just raises the question of just how ignorant you really are.....

Ann Coulter: I generally don't write columns about the manifestly obvious,

That is because she is too dense to even recognize the obvious.

mAnn used to aggravate me, but now I just find her amusing. Kind of the journalistic joke of the right wing loony bin.

"Clinton didn't cause 9/11. He just did nothing to prevent it

sully

right...like he could have...lol"


Clinton was busy defending himself in Court against frivolous charges from the Right while Osama was busy making plans to attack America...

Thanks Rethugs... you helped set the stage for 9/11.

Clinton had Iraq contained. Bush gleefully opened that Pandora's Box and let Chaos out. The myth that Terrorists are swimming across the oceans and lining up at the borders to attack us is just that ... a MYTH.

Kind of like the myth of "Executive Privilege".

3. "Made it happen on purpose" - The attacks were actually planned and orchestrated by the Pentagon and/or US secret services

is my $1 million plus bet:>)

"Look at me, Look at me"

"I'm saying whatever is opposite from the truth, so people will give me attention"

"Look at me"

Ann (look at me) Coulter

Ann Coulter should just just go ahead and give Bush that Blow Job she is dying to give him...

Clinton was busy defending himself in Court against frivolous charges from the Right while Osama was busy making plans to attack America...


And yet somehow planned Operation Desert Fox, the Kosovo War, and even sent a few cruise missiles into Afghanistan...

Other then those obvious examples he was completely tied down...

Semper Douche, fake marine.

"Clinton was busy defending himself in Court against frivolous charges from the Right while Osama was busy making plans to attack America...

Thanks Rethugs... you helped set the stage for 9/11."

Pathetic. Clinton ignored attacks before the whole Lewinsky scandal came out so this point is entirely untrue. And secondly, if Bill wasn't fooling around with his subordinates while at work (which was and is wrong) then the whole thing wouldn't have happened. So if you're trying to say that scandal caused Clinton to ignore Al Queda (which it didn't) then you would have to blame Clinton for creating the scandal anyway.

Look, either you believe these guys were responsible for their actions (or inaction) while in office or you don't. The person at the top is supposed to be accountable. These guys not only wanted the top job, they actively campaigned for it over other people. People who act as apologists for poor performance are the reason why we have shitty leaders.

Those are the hands of giants

"(Bush) gets an assist on 9/11. It did happen under his watch."

How is it the only sentry position in the armed forces where the guard can blame the guy who got off shift long before is Commander-in-Chief?

"Ann Coulter should just just go ahead and give Bush that Blow Job she is dying to give him...

Posted by donnerboy at 2008-06-16 01:12 PM"

I suppose Bush may make an exception to his "men-only" BJ rule, since Ann has an Adams Apple and all...

Other then those obvious examples he was completely tied down...

Semper Douche, fake marine.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole at 2008-06-16 01:26 PM

Poor woobie... is yer Pooper sore from the reaming yer getting for being such a loser this year? Woobie crawls out from uder his rock to say boo!

So.. what you are saying there Mr Hole is that being Impeached really isn't much of a distraction... well, that being the case then we have no excuse not to Impeach Bush after all! We have 35 Articles on the table and it won't distract us from the business of State at all.

Guess we need to get that Impeachment back on the Table where it belongs! I smell Pork for dinner! Or is it Chicken?

Yup, its chicken Woobie.. buck! buck! buck!

The only thing worse than that creepy fuck dethpud is the loser that tries to steal that pedos schtik.

When you get Olbermanns' balls out of your mouth maybe you can ask him why O'Reilly continually kicks the shit out of him?

How is it the only sentry position in the armed forces where the guard can blame the guy who got off shift long before is Commander-in-Chief?

Posted by Danforth


Because all the bad guys were already past the sentry post when the new guy took over...

Because all the bad guys were already past the sentry post when the new guy took over...

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole at 2008-06-16 02:49 PM | Reply

Then You must blame Bush 41 for the things that happened on 9-11-01 (If You believe the official story) Cause the First WTC attack uponed not 36 days after Bill Clinton took over for Bush 41. So All the bad guys got past the sentry post when the new guy(Bill Clinton) took over.

Larry Mohr

Then You must blame Bush 41 for the things that happened on 9-11-01

Did you mean the First WTC attack... not 9/11? Because none of the 9/11 hijackers were in the country in 92... hell the idea wasn't even thought up by Khalid Sheik Mohammed until a few years later...

But if you want to say that Bush 41 is to receive some of the blame for the first WTC attack then yeah, you'd be right, because his successor really couldn't have done much to stop them when he was in office.

"Because all the bad guys were already past the sentry post when the new guy took over..."

And the new guy did absolutely zilch. Zero. Nada. Less than, actually, since he a) ignored the Clinton administration's parting warning bin Laden was dangerous, b) whiffed on the Aug 6 PDB, and c) stalled Richard Clarke's requests.

? Because none of the 9/11 hijackers were in the country in 92...

robby

nor possibly during 911 ~ in view of half the 19 boxcutters seemingly still living tn the mideast ~ funi on how that works in Bushland (& Cintonland for that matter:>)

I voted against Bush twice but I think it's a bit early to start projecting how he'll be viewed in a historical perspective.

While most definitely different in terms of social progressiveness, I think Bush's foreign involvements are strikingly similar to Teddy Roosevelt's imperialistic policies. Historically, I think our involvement and occupation of Iraq is most analogous to our occupation of the Philippines and the civil war in Columbia (giving us Panama).

Over the past 100 years, Democrats have forgiven TR for his experiments in imperialism, and Republicans have forgiven him for the Square Deal and his antitrust suits. At this point, I'm willing to bet that most Americans know very little about TR's foreign policy outside of "speak softly and carry a big stick".

Time tends to heal a lot of wounds. JFK is still wildly popular despite getting us into Vietnam, Truman is more popular today than he was during his own time, and I can think of many WWII Generals who made disastrous decisions, yet are now held to a very high regard. I also recall reading an article (around 1993) that more Americans looked back at Carter's presidency in a better light than that of Reagan.

I doubt that Bush will be a JFK or TR but I do think his legacy will be based primarily on the outcome of Iraq. If Iraq and the middle east do stabilize (I have my doubts) in the next few decades, Bush will probably be an un-rememberable President. If the Middle East goes to hell, he'll probably wind up another Hoover.

"Because none of the 9/11 hijackers were in the country in 92... hell the idea wasn't even thought up by Khalid Sheik Mohammed until a few years later..."

Data from 9/11 Commission Report:

Khalid Sheik Mohammed got a degree in mechanical engineering from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University in 1986. He played a "cameo role" in the first WTC bombing.

KSM planned the 12 plane bombing scheme in 1994.
It was discovered, but by then he was safely out of the Philippines.

In 1996 KSM and Bin Laden met at Tora Bora and the 9/11 plot came out of that meeting.

Planning for 9/11 began "in earnest" by early 1999.

Funny thing is Mohammad Atta was renting my Cessna in 1996. That's when I commented, "Looks like we're training our own hijackers."

"Moments before the planes impacted the WTC, millions of dollars in credit card transactions surged into companies which had their computer systems in the WTC."

Sure thing there, Bluffalo BoOb

Actually you're less entertaining than BoOb.

OOps! when you get yer foot out of yer mouth you can remind u show stupid you are...perhaps you too should pay better attention...



MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" beat Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" in the key Adults 25-54 demographic for the first time ever last week.

"Countdown" averaged 477,000 viewers (A25-54) vs. O'Reilly's 472,000 (excluding Tuesday's primary coverage). This marks the first time that MSNBC has beaten Fox News in O'Reilly's 8pm time slot since June 2001.



www.huffingtonpost.com
POSTED BY DONNERBOY AT 2008-06-16 03:00 PM | REPLY | FLAG


Oh wow, it sucks to be you huh stupid? See below, and don't be too hard on yourself dummy.



One Angry Man: Keith Olbermann

while you were off being lied to by Faux News Olberman went and beat O'Liely's ratings! You should pay closer attention!

Posted by donnerboy at 2008-06-16 01:25 PM | Reply


And you should know whjat the fuck you're talking about before you open your Olbermann catcher.

The ratings you are alluding to, and the ones Danni so stupidly touted (and then ran when confronted with the truth) are for one whole week. A week in which O'Reilly was only on 3 nights. How did O'reilly do those 3 nights in a head to head competition with Keith? As usual, he kicked the living shit out of him, doubling his audience.


I know fools like you can't help but repeat what was on Huffington Post or Kos, but at least try not to be so fucking stupid about it.

Now run away like Danni did you wanna be 3rd person talking douche.

Posted by 101Chairborne at 2008-06-16 02:12 PM | Reply

"The ratings you are alluding to, and the ones Danni so stupidly touted (and then ran when confronted with the truth) are for one whole week."

Ran??? You are, as always, full of crap. I never made any claims other than that Olberman had won the ratings, I didn't claim it was for any length of time nor did I believe it was for any particular length of time. It was just a dig at some right wing loon. You make me laugh....run???? From a silly "blog" bully like you??? Hilarious.

You run from facts Danni. Trust me, the last thing I want to do is chase some geriatric bull dyke.

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."



- Arthur Schopenhauer German philosopher, 1788-1860

George W is GREAT!

Your post makes you a liar Danni. You touted the huffingtonpost link. The link (and you) are spin. You posted the link and text from that link that claims a time period. I know you're not up on that whole personal responsibility thing so we'll just pretend like this never happened...


Senate Repubs Block Tax on Big Oil Profits

"Saying it, doesn't make it true."

When I say it, it is true dummy.


""MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" beat Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" in the key Adults 25-54 demographic for the first time ever last week.

"Countdown" averaged 477,000 viewers (A25-54) vs. O'Reilly's 472,000 (excluding Tuesday's primary coverage). This marks the first time that MSNBC has beaten Fox News in O'Reilly's 8pm time slot since June 2001.""

www.huffingtonpost.com

Posted by danni at 2008-06-12 12:40 PM | Reply

George W Bush is among our best presidents?

I guess I would have to rank him somewhere in the top 50.

Wow, approaching 200 posts! Some people still buy the "W is great" shit!?! An ever-growing minority. The neo-cons are just about done for.

And it will take generations to UNDO the damage done by Coulter's "greatest president"!

Gargoyle -- I bet he will fall out of that "select group" of the Top-50 within the next 2 decades.

At least I hope there will never be anyone comparble to Dubya or Dick as POTUS or VP ever again!

Your post makes you a liar Danni. You touted the huffingtonpost link. The link (and you) are spin.

Posted by 101Chairborne at 2008-06-16 04:29 PM

your post makes you look like the anal retentive loofah sponge loving prevert that you are...

can't stand that Olberman is gaining on your lying piece O shit O'Liely?

awww too bad chairpoodle.... go sniff some poop and call it chocolate like a good faux news doggie!

Gargoyle -- I bet he will fall out of that "select group" of the Top-50 within the next 2 decades.

Posted by townncountry

I firmly believe he will fall out of the top 50. But it is mathematically impossible for him to do it in two decades.

Of course, I may be "misunderestimating" him.

Wow. Coulter will say anything to get attention. I would not classify her as a journalist - more entertainer/pundit. I do not think the majority of people who voted for him even think this.

your post makes you look like the anal retentive loofah sponge loving prevert that you are...


Posted by donnerboy at 2008-06-16 05:17 PM | Reply |

Absolute classic. A dumb fuck like you swallows the Huffington Post link hook, line, and sinker. What a good little lemming.
Then I come by and slap you upside your retarded little head with the fact that Olbermann didn't beat O'Reilly not even one single time in a head to head match up that week and you call it "anal retentive".

You see stupid, everyone else would call what I posted a fact.

You're a god damned fool and you got kicked square in the pussy on this one.

Go clean yourself up stupid, I'm done with you.

and you call it "anal retentive".

You see stupid, everyone else would call what I posted a fact.

You're a god damned fool and you got kicked square in the pussy on this one.

Go clean yourself up stupid, I'm done with you.

Posted by 101Chairborne at 2008-06-16 06:40 PM


No Buttwad ... I called YOU anal retentive... everyone that doesn't tow the "party" line is a douche bag to you... go ahead and be "done" with me... we are ALL done with you Bush Licker and all your fool buds...soon you and your kind will be relegated to the ash heap of history...praise Jebus!

fact is Olberman HAS been slowly gaining on O'Liely but is tough to be the shameless FEAR mongering of the Rightie Tighties...

The Truth is not as glamorous as the Lies and Spin of the Right...

Olberman is OOberman!

but is tough to be the shameless FEAR mongering of the Rightie Tighties...

should have been...

but it is tough to compete with the shameless FEAR mongering of the Rightie Tighties...

"...tough to compete with the shameless FEAR mongering of the Rightie Tighties..."

Most of the time they lack even that. Don. The DR's tighties, embodied by the bogus paratrooper, BLT, Vernon, Tim, The Snipe, Ever and a shitload of others are totally bankrupt.

I mean ... their tank is empty! Not an idea from one in months. No reply to anything, except to call you dumb, usually in the manner of pre-teen offspring of trailer trash.

I've posted on Bush, the war, the economy, reproductive rights, death penalty, the press and countless other themes. Maybe not always spot on, but usually on the side of what's best for the most people. And how do the Great Unwashed reply? By calling you stoopid. Period, herm

GARGOYLE. Oops! If there are 20 years, and each term averages 4 years, we'll be up to # 48 by 2028 and #49 by 2029. So, oops! Hopefully each will be 8 years in duration and each will be commendable. Guess I should have said in 50 years!

This woman is either a well paid circus geek or an idiot:

"We invaded Iraq to protect America.

It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq."

But on top of that, she is a ghoul sucking the bodies of the dead:

"Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith."

Imagine if a Democrat - who are "anti-military", of course - had said that about the dead in Iraq.