Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Laura Bush defended Sen. Barack Obama's wife, Michelle, for a controversial remark on the campaign trail in February. "I think she probably meant I'm 'more proud,'" Bush told ABC News, "[T]hat's one of the really difficult parts both of running for president and for being the spouse of the president, and that is, everything you say is looked at and in many cases misconstrued."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

nullifidian

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

"Laura Bush also defended Sen. Barack Obama's wife, Michelle, for a controversial remark on the campaign trail in February.

"For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback," Michelle Obama said in a speech in Milwaukee.

"I think she probably meant I'm 'more proud,' you know, is what she really meant," Bush told ABC News. "You have to be very careful in what you say. I mean, I know that, and that's one of the things you learn and that's one of the really difficult parts both of running for president and for being the spouse of the president, and that is, everything you say is looked at and in many cases misconstrued."

arent you the same piece of shit who called the first lady a cunt or is that some other piece of leftist shit?

I've never called Laura Bush a "cunt." Never would. Maybe John McCain did. I hear he likes that word. Even called his own wife that.

Null--Not True--no sources no confirmation..

And why would you post the thread about Laura Bush and then trash her?

You are sincerely weak.

What in the fuck are you talking about, Goofy? Watch the video! She said what she said.

Apparently the booze is flowing freely at the Murphy residence this evening.

youtube.com

I have to give Laura credit for class here.

She obviously hasn't read Michelle's thesis.

Bee Swell

Neither have you.

See you in denver. lol

Tell us about that thesis Junkie.

Come forth!

Someone better tell Hannity. He likes to trash Michelle for this comment.

I agree about the 'being proud' statement.

I'm proud of America, but I don't have to proud of the administration.

Do people overseas hate Americans or the administration?

When the Soviets were behind the curtain, I didn't hate the people. I had family trapped behind the curtain since WWII.

The focus of her complaint, and those of Wright and gang, are from a certain point of view. Even if the view is skewed at times.

Thesis is here. I scanned through Part 1. It seemed well researched and well written and the arguments were coherent. What more is needed from a 21-year old's senior thesis? Political correctness? Beats anything I was ever writing or thinking when I was 21, that's for sure.

"She obviously hasn't read Michelle's thesis."
of course this idiot hasn't read it as well, he just repeats what his handler says. It's well known that righttards have very limited reading abilities and can only respond to the carictures of their percieved enemies. (usually provided by their handlers, talking points)

Laura Bush's stylist must have formerly done Jack Nicholson's makeup in the 1989 Batman movie.

"Laura Bush's stylist must have formerly done Jack Nicholson's makeup in the 1989 Batman movie."

Y'know, now that you mention it . . .
You've got a point.
And a FF!

Laura Bush has spent the best part of the last fifteen years under the microscope. She's an old-style first lady and there's nothing wrong with that, you are what you are. Her opinions about being the spouse of a presidential candidate are certainly of more value than the mean-spirited idiots here who call her names or the right wing ranters going after Michelle Obama.

"Laura Bush's stylist must have formerly done Jack Nicholson's makeup in the 1989 Batman movie."
Posted by WilliamJ

I don't know how many times I've looked at the first lady and said,....

"Love That Joker!"

Laura is taking the high road, but in all honesty there is no way she mean't "more proud."

"For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback."

Just underscores the main reason for me anyways, why I find it very difficult to consider Obama, and that is the people who he is surrounded by and supported by. He's a good man, and great candidate, and may even make a good/great president, but these people who are around him including this slag make me sick, and I want nothing to do with them.

She obviously hasn't read Michelle's thesis.

That's a hilarious talking point to pass around. Her thesis is 225 pages long ...

www.scribd.com

Nobody has read it, outside of some poor shlumps in McCain and Clinton's opposition research departments.

He's a good man, and great candidate, and may even make a good/great president ...

If you feel that way about Obama, what else matters? The guilt-by-association game can be played by anybody against anybody.

If you feel that way about Obama, what else matters? The guilt-by-association game can be played by anybody against anybody.

Posted by rcade


I don't know... there's just something about Wright, and his wife, and Ayers, and his church... its a real turnoff.

Plus I say the same about McCain... he's a good man, a great candidate, and may make a good/great president BUT he isn't surrounded by these types of people...

Please don't say Hagee, that's really a non-issue.

How about Charlie Black and that crew of trough slurpers?

BUT he isn't surrounded by these types of people...

He's surrounded by people like Charlie Black, Charles Keating, G. Gordon Liddy and that thieving, junkie trollop/cunt.

What evidence is there that he is a good man, great camdidate and could be a great president?

He is a good speaker when someone else writes it for him, he's for some unknown type of change and his list of accomplishments is non-existent.

arent you the same piece of shit who called the first lady a cunt or is that some other piece of leftist shit?
Posted by bushlovertwo at 2008-06-09 09:47 PM


YEAH!

Trollopy Cunt is a more accurate description!
I'm surprised this whooped and beat down into submission Robot is still capable!

Sincerely

Neil "Somebody's Gotta to Say it" Boortz

Plus I say the same about McCain... he's a good man, a great candidate, and may make a good/great president BUT he isn't surrounded by these types of people...

How about Phil Gramm? He'll do or say anything if the price is right.

He is a good speaker when someone else writes it for him,...

God, you're an ignorant fucker, FWT. Obama has written two books. I'd suggest you read them if I thought there was the slightest chance you would.

"That's a hilarious talking point to pass around. Her thesis is 225 pages long ... Nobody has read it, outside of some poor shlumps in McCain and Clinton's opposition research departments"

I just looked at it. It's another undergraduate survey, this time about an aspect of black experience. Surveys like this are typically what UG's do when they have no serious research ideas and can't find a collaborative advisor. Remember she would have been 21 or 22 at the time and went to HLS right after this so she can't complain.

Anyway, note that this copy appears to have been scanned through OCR software that gave 2 inch margins and totally screwed up the formatting in many of the pages. She indicated via the page numbers in the contents that the original paper is 66 pages.

"I'd suggest you read them if I thought there was the slightest chance you would.

Posted by BlueInBushland"

Or could.

Barack Obama's books were probably ghost written by Rev Wright, Phleger, and William Ayers.

Ignorant AND predictable.

"If you feel that way about Obama, what else matters? The guilt-by-association game can be played by anybody against anybody.

Posted by rcade

I don't know... there's just something about Wright, and his wife, and Ayers, and his church... its a real turnoff.

Posted by Rob_The_A_Hole"

I don't know... there's just something about Senators, and their lobbyists, and the Congress...
its a real turnoff.

"And why would you post the thread about Laura Bush and then trash her?

You are sincerely weak.

Posted by MURPHY at 2008-06-09 09:54 PM"

I read every post on this thread up to Murphy's, and I am mystified about what caused her to post this. Murphy? Are you sloshed again? Are you sure it wasn't your friend Jim Beam who trashed Laura? Or maybe Jack Daniels?

*hiccup*

You socialist democrats have absolutely no class. Confabulation, innuendo and down right lies fill your rhetoric. The word hypocrite does not begin to decribe
your character. The bottom line is, you want government to take care of you. Stop with the double speak and standards. I get it. I hope you get Obama and your dream of a free lunch. I, as a man of abilityand self reliance, will endure your folly. You on the
other hand must have my participation to get that free lunch. You shall not. Your trust fund baby heroes are not enough. Your George soros's are not enough. Those that lead you to the belief that freedom is without toil and sacrifice will be puffed up in perceived triumph.
That terrible thing known as responsibility will
than be put upon them. The nemeses of their long winded lectures. You see, freedom means individual responsibility.

"He is a good speaker when someone else writes it for him, he's for some unknown type of change and his list of accomplishments is non-existent."

"Barack Obama's books were probably ghost written by Rev Wright, Phleger, and William Ayers."

Hmmmm wrong on both counts but your right wing buddies will believe it. Who cares. You and they would never vote for anyone that Rush didn't tell you to anyway.

Laura told Michelle that is she ever wanted to kill an ex-boyfriend, that she should use her car, as vehicular homicide is much tougher to prove that vehicular manslaughter.

I hope she wasn't trying give Michelle Obama parenting advice.

"The bottom line is, you want government to take care of you.

Posted by westerner at 2008-06-10 01:34 PM"

You know what, Westerner, you stepped on a cow chip here. Red States get more federal aid than they pay in taxes, and Blue States pay more in taxes than they get in federal aid. It is "socialist democrats" who takes of ignorant Republicans, not the other way around.

Now go clean off your boots, you smell.

Monte,

The red-state blue-state thing is bullshit and you know it.


Michigan is a blue state. WHO in Michigan is paying the Lion's share of federal income taxes?

Hint: It isn't all of the Democrats living in Detroit.

Another hint: It's mostly the wealthy Republicans living in Oakland county who are paying these taxes.

So, it's the Republicans who are paying the Lion's share of the federal income taxes in Michigan, yet you try and count them as 'blue-staters', which by implication means they are actually Democrats.



You guys are too funny. Your party is the party of the poor, yet Democrats are so great they aren't actually poor at all - they pay all of the taxes because their rich? Yet they are good for the poor?

Your logic is lacking on this one, Monte.

You don't know what you're talking about, Jeff.

"Funny, that. I have in front of me the latest report from the Tax Foundation showing how much each state gets back in contracts, benefits and subsidies for every dollar of taxes paid. And it shows that, with a few exceptions, the anti-government red states are the net winners in the flow of funds while the pro-government blue states are almost all losers."

www.washingtonpost.com

Actually, I do know what I am talking about, Null.


Unless a red-state is comprised of 100% Republicans or a blue-state is comprised of 100% Democrats, then your stats are an excersize in intellectual laziness at best, or are purely disingenuous.


To me, a more meaningful comparison would be to compare income brackets. It is safe to say that the Republican party gets well over half of the vote for the top brackets and the Democratic party gets well over half the votes for the bottom brackets.

Now, let's analyze the federal tax payments of the top brackets vs. the bottom brackets. Then, let's analyze how much the top gets back in federal funds (throw in corporate welfare) vs. how much the bottom gets in entitlements.

A picutre emerges that is far different than the one that Monte, and now you, are trying to sell.

No. You don't know what you're talking about. The facts speak for themselves. Overall, red states get subsidized by blue states. It doesn't matter what the voter composition is. If you want to make other comparisons go ahead, it doesn't change the facts.

"Hey wife, you're a cunt." - John McSame

I am not disputing the facts.


What I am challenging is the insinuation that goes along with the label of 'red-state' or 'blue-state'.


You know full well what you are trying to accomplish when making such comparisons.

This is what Monte said:

Red States get more federal aid than they pay in taxes, and Blue States pay more in taxes than they get in federal aid. It is "socialist democrats" who takes of ignorant Republicans, not the other way around.


THAT is exactly what I was challenging.

Even the rightwing National Review admits that blue states subsidize red states.

corner.nationalreview.com

THAT is exactly what I was challenging.

THAT is not what you said originally. You said:

The red-state blue-state thing is bullshit and you know it.

That statement is bullshit. Your "refinement" of your position is more problematic.

The red-state blue-state thing is bullshit and you know it.


Which was in direct response to this:


Red States get more federal aid than they pay in taxes, and Blue States pay more in taxes than they get in federal aid. It is "socialist democrats" who takes of ignorant Republicans, not the other way around.




Monte equated red-states and blue-states with Repubilcans and Democrats. THAT is what I was challenging. If you didn't see that before it should certainly be clear to you now.

Don't start parsing semantics, it is very unbecoming. You are usually above such pettiness.

If I had to pick a favorite member of the Bush Administration, it would have to be Laura. I know she really isn't a part of the Administration, but that's as close as I will ever get to expressing admiration for a member of that Baptistic-cult....

In other news, I think my neighbor's are peeping through my window. I can't say that I blame them. Thanks to Wii Fit, naked video gaming is at it's climax of sexiness.

Hey Jeff - go change your penny loafers, you smell.

"If I had to pick a favorite member of the Bush Administration, it would have to be Laura"

I agree. She seems very decent. Too bad for her she's married to an asshole. But then, a lot of women are married to assholes. Just ask RideOn's wife.

Red States get more federal aid than they pay in taxes, and Blue States pay more in taxes than they get in federal aid. It is "socialist democrats" who takes of ignorant Republicans, not the other way around.


THAT is exactly what I was challenging.

Posted by JeffJ at 2008-06-10 03:03 PM | Reply | Flag:



and?

You're still wrong.

You're still wrong.


Nope.



Check out my tax bracket scenario. Then don't just say it, show me where I am wrong.

It is safe to say that the Republican party gets well over half of the vote for the top brackets and the Democratic party gets well over half the votes for the bottom brackets.
Posted by JeffJ


So you agree that the Pubs are the party of the Rich and the Dems are the party of regular working folks? Acting for the benefit of their respective demographic?

Barack Obama's books were probably ghost written by Rev Wright, Phleger, and William Ayers."

Hmmmm wrong on both counts but your right wing buddies will believe it. Who cares. You and they would never vote for anyone that Rush didn't tell you to anyway.

Posted by danni at 2008-06


so, sweety, how in the fuck are you so sure that he wrote them. whats the definition of a 'ghost writer' isnt it so that people DONT KNOW who really wrote them. I am not doubting that he wrote them, what I am doubting is your 'cockiness' in thinking you fuckin know everything.

Laura told Michelle that is she ever wanted to kill an ex-boyfriend, that she should use her car, as vehicular homicide is much tougher to prove that vehicular manslaughter.

I hope she wasn't trying give Michelle Obama parenting advice.

Posted by COMMONSENSE


your first comment is just so much bullshit...and lets see........the 2nd one.....yeah, lets see both girls help the poor AROUND THE WORLD and one has now TWO books to her credit and both are written with ALL PROFITS going to poor people......
so where did BARRYWAYNE HUSSEIN send the profits to his books...........REZKO maybe??????????????

Red States get more federal aid than they pay in taxes

Im not sure who initiated this but it doesnt matter as this is not the case for all
here in texas we will have a TEN BILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS..........thats EXTRA...........AFTER the bills are paid..............so freeze in the fuckin dark you pissants............YA ha h ah ah ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

and this thread is a wonderful look into the hate filled mind of our socialist bros here on the retort.

here the first lady talks about how we are mistaking what she has said and what do some of you asswipes do? keep up the hatefilled and juvenile rhetoric that makes you all seems so insignificant and useless. you should ALL say that you are proud of laura, not talk shit about her and her daughters. but alas, its what we have come to expect from too many of you here..........too bad.

I'll have to disagree with Laura on this one. There have been times in my life in which I am more proud of my country than others. When I am more proud, I don't say, "for the first time, I am proud." I simply say "I am proud" without the initial qualification. It may seem like a few words, but it makes a difference, since adding that "for the first time" would never even enter the mind of someone who had ever been proud of it before.

It's okay for her not to be proud of her country. Liberals should be embracing her statement. Most of them are ashamed of American and should not be trying to pretend that the wife of another liberal wouldn't feel the same way.

how in the fuck are you so sure that he wrote them

Cos Barack is well known fer being an excellent writer.

He wrote his own books and he writes a larger percentage of his own speeches than any other pol out there.

Barack has prolly written more than Dumbya and McNasty combined have ever read.

Laura, at age 17, killed her classmate/ boyfriend in a so-called
"accident"

That's a fact, BLT.

Exactly how "accidental" it was is the only debateable point.

You think the Bush Bints are a class act?

Figures, ...yer such an R-tard it's scary.

Luff yer mock offended act. Too funny.

"If ya can't take the heat?

Get the hell out the kitchen.

We on a mission."

Be Well.

There have been times in my life in which I am more proud of my country than others. When I am more proud, I don't say, "for the first time, I am proud." I simply say "I am proud" without the initial qualification. It may seem like a few words, but it makes a difference, since adding that "for the first time" would never even enter the mind of someone who had ever been proud of it before.

~Joe

Michelle put it two different ways in the same speech.

The one the Reichwing losers like to concentrate on is when she sed...

"For the first time I am proud of my country"

Later she sez...

"For the first time I am REALLY proud of my country"

The idea that Michelle Obama has never been proud of her country in her entire life up till now is an absurd piece of nonsense that only a shit4brains reichwinger could possibly buy into.

That sed, America has a lot to be proud of and a lot to be ashamed of.

All countries do.

America more than most.

Saying "I never been proud of my country" makes as little sense as saying "I've never been ashamed of my country".

Like most absolutist statements those are nonsensical.

The TRUE history of America is one that doesn't get much play in the corporate media.

But the truth WILL out.

Be Well.

PS: Are you proud of Abu Ghraib? Of the Secret Torture Sites around the world? Of using Depleted Uranium Munitions? Of using Clusterbombs? White Phosphorus? Of having the highest prison population on earth? Of the growing gap between rich and poor? Of exporting terror and torture techniques to countries who's legitimate governments have been toppled by the US in order to satisfy a multinational corporate agenda? Suspension of Habeus Corpus? Politicisation of the AG leading to witchhunts? Spying on yer own citizenry?

Many years ago I used to chuckle at Spud as I agreed with much of what he said. Hell, He was my Hero on Drudge and I always LOOKED for his posts.

Now I read what he says and can't understand the logic. Either I have become CRAZY conservative or he has become CRAZY socialist. Or, perhaps, someone stole Spud's identity!

I'm going with identity theft on this one. Spud was never a mean potato.

never a mean potato.

Just an arrogant little prick with no respect for himself or others.

well potatobreath...........
IF YOU AND DANNI say that he wrote them himself...........
well shit fellers, who can argue with you two scholars......................
hee hee



and AGAIN I say.....laura was saying something that HELPS OBAMA and STILL you worthless piles of dogshit keep on her...........you are so enraged with hate, you cant even read this correctly and here's hoping there is some professional help in your futures.

and now its margarita time in tejas......
have a good one...........

"The bottom line is, you want government to take care of you.

Posted by westerner at 2008-06-10 01:34 PM"

You know what, Westerner, you stepped on a cow chip here. Red States get more federal aid than they pay in taxes, and Blue States pay more in taxes than they get in federal aid. It is "socialist democrats" who takes of ignorant Republicans, not the other way around.

Now go clean off your boots, you smell.

Posted by mOntecOre

The boots will have to wait, since I've been wading through your ridiculous thought process. Red, blue purple doesn't matter. To lend credence to your logic, one would have to assume that most taxes are paid by dems. RIGHT! Take NY. 1/3 of the people in NY City are on medicaid. Are they paying taxes? I think not. Enough money passes through NYC to carry them and exceed the cost. When the doers stop doing, that 1/3 will be screwed. They will vote to keep that check coming. Mr. Obama and his party think the mule will pull the wagon without getting some grain. Won't happen. Those people will have to pull their own weight. Problem is, they don't know how.

She is a class act.

I will let her moment stand without commenting on her husband.

Posted by dethspud at 2008-06-10 05:34 PM

Are you proud of Abu Ghraib? Of the Secret Torture Sites around the world? Of using Depleted Uranium Munitions? Of using Clusterbombs? White Phosphorus?

Yes.
Of having the highest prison population on earth?

In suppose that treatment of the U.S. population is not repressive, so certain elements commit crimes since the punishment is confinement under rather pleasant conditions.
Of the growing gap between rich and poor?

Weren't all boats rising, there, deth? Until the current oil crisis. But we'll need to whip some Arab and Islamic ass and take those resources to maintain our standard of living. We can't allow our poor to suffer because of these foreigners now, can we?

Our compassion in allowing other countries to develop, has put a strain on the world's energy resources and has impacted us adversely. such self-abnegating kindness is indeed a weakness.

Of exporting terror and torture techniques to countries who's legitimate governments have been toppled by the US in order to satisfy a multinational corporate agenda?

That's a compound sentence, deth.

Other countries certainly have more effective and crueler torture techniques than we do, such as the Afghans skinning their prisoners. And they certainly are less restrained. So, no export of techniques is required.

Which legitimate governments have we toppled, deth? Iraq? Are you lead pleader for Sadaam Hussein and his cousin, Chemical Ali, now?
Suspension of Habeus Corpus?

Hallucinating again, deth? when did this occur? During the Lincoln administration? Or arguably during the Wilson administration? Or de facto, during the FDR administration? Are you delving into history there, deth?
Politicisation of the AG leading to witchhunts?

Yes, poor Scooter Libby was the victim of a witch hunt. Conducted after all of the facts were in the possession of an unscrupulous prosecutor. The Bush administration has suffered. And a Republican being acquitted in the Democrat enclave of D.C. is unlikely regardless of guilt or innocence. Now Mayor Barry and other Democrats are forgiven and reelected despite corruption and drug use. Why even Obama, a druggie, was selected as Democrat presidential nominee.
Spying on yer own citizenry?

It's a little bit of a stretch there, Canuck. Eavesdropping on phone calls from overseas terrorist sites seems reasonable. After all, your superiors in Great Britain, one of the MIs, do it routinely, a very reasonable and practical undertaking.

I suppose that foreign America haters such as you, deth, would prefer that terrorists were enabled to do Americans harm.

By the way, you have your own trial currently of some 15, or so, Islamic terrorists apprehended in Canada. Are you part of a support group for indigenous Islamic Canadian terrorists, deth? Come on.

You're all driving me nuts!!! Reading the above comments is like listening in on a room of patients in an insane asylum.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable