Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, June 03, 2008

A place to discuss the stories that aren't making news, ask questions, complain bitterly about this site and its members, or just screw around. The only rule: Be nice or be funny.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Coffee -- ahhhhh, I make great coffee.

So how many 'WE ARE SCREWED '08' bumper stickers have you guys seen?

Pistons fire head coach Saunders

ca.reuters.com

It's too bad they fired this guy, he is a good coach. However, the Pistons didn't get to the NBA finals for three years now. Considering how they play in the regular season, I can certainly understand why they are sacking this guy.

Soldiers sent to Fort Benning to recover from PTSDl live in housing that looks out on "some of the Army infantry's main firing ranges, and day and night, several days each week, barrages from rifles and machine guns echo around [the] building[s]. The noise makes the wounded cringe, startle in their formations, and stay awake and on edge, according to several soldiers interviewed at the barracks last month. The gunfire recently sent one soldier to the emergency room with an anxiety attack."
www.washingtonpost.com

Send some this way, i need it. Who the hell decides Monday night is a good night for a concert? And who design the stupid parking arrangements that require waiting two hours to get out of the show?

salamandagator

Maybe you should have just taken a nap in your car for a couple of hours.

The noise makes the wounded cringe, startle in their formations, and stay awake and on edge, according to several soldiers interviewed at the barracks last month. The gunfire recently sent one soldier to the emergency room with an anxiety attack."


Ahhh another example of fine planning by our administration.

Not with all the horns blaring and people shouting.

"Ahhh another example of fine planning by our administration."

Yeah, let them eat cake!

No GI Bill for you!

With districts redrawn, ingratiating himself to black politicians on his side of the city, and rules loosened on voter registration, Obama could set out to run. And he did. Obama sought the New Party endorsement, which required him to sign a contract that he would keep up his relationship with the New Party.


The end of the story is simple. Obama won the New Party's nomination and, through fusion with his Democratic votes, he became the Democratic nominee. Using ACORN's get out the vote efforts and relying on his gerrymandered Democrat district, Obama moved on to the State Senate. While there, he paid back the New Party and the far left. He opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, he opposed legislation that would have prohibited the sale of pornography across the street from elementary schools and churches, and he supported allowing criminals to sue their victims if their victims injured the criminals in self-defense.

This is the second leg of the radical triad that Obama has used to advance his political career. The first leg can be seen in his long time friendship with both Jeremiah Wright and Father Michael Pfleger - two religious/political powerhouses on the south side of Chicago. Obama's coziness with those radical preachers gave him a firm base on which to run for office.

The big question mark is the Nation of Islam and Louis Farrakhan. The NoI is very powerful on the south side and many are wondering what kind of deal Obama may have made with them. Tony Rezko, long time fund raiser and political mentor of Obama has personal ties to Farrakhan (you couldn't build a treehouse on the south side without the NoI's permission) and there has been speculation that Rezko could have been a go-between for the two (Obama not wanting to taint himself with the stench of Farrakhan's radical separatism and anti-semitism.).

Are we about to elect a president who has made common political cause with Marxists? This should prove interesting as the press wrestles with a way to keep the damage regarding these revelations to a minimum.

Boy the right is really fucking desperate.

726-given they know they're looking at a severe ass-kicking in November, and their Presidential candidate is senile, it's understandable.

That's how you know they're worried...they started trotting out all manner of stupidity and half truths.

Lot of anger on DR this morning. Can't we all just get along?

Boy the right is really fucking desperate.

Posted by 726 at 2008-06-03 12:14 PM |

Desperate?? We are barely in June and the Right hasn't even attacked the Golden Boy. Have you read about his association with the Joyce Foundation? Can't wait until the NRA brings this up along with his other anti second amendment policies.

Northguy,

Before McSame began his short trip to dementia he was batshit angry crazy to start with.

Not much of a character change, but at least he had some balls to actually fight in a war unlike Lil Bush.

Unless you count the untold number of Mexican Kegs and bags of Coke he defended this nation from.

Ben Voth
Recently members of Congress treated the media and the American public to the spectacle of questioning oil executives as to why gasoline prices were so high. Though this theater has been repeated with some vigor since at least the 1970s, members of Congress seem to lack no eagerness for these predictable performances of outrage. Perhaps of greater interest would be some careful self reflection among members as to how Congress has caused the very shortages and price spikes that they are blaming on oil executives.


The regulatory relationship that Congress has relentlessly sought to impose on the energy sector of the American economy has had deadly effects on the supply of gasoline in the United States. Whether limiting the building of gasoline refineries or banning yet another area of the United States from fossil fuel extraction, the Congress has been quite deliberate for some time in reducing the supply of energy for Americans. But in the chambers of Congress with TV cameras rolling, representatives express shock and dismay that reduced supply in face of growing demand produces higher prices. Perhaps this is some of the reason for Congress' current 15% approval rating.


Ostensibly, the regulatory relationship of the Federal government vigorously promoted by the Congress has protected our natural environment. Sadly, even these benign intentions expressed by Congress are not only misguided but counter productive. In the 1990s, advocates argued that an expensive fuel additive known as MTBE should be added to gasoline to protect the environment. Congress consequently mandated the addititve. It was not long after considerable energy industry cost, that the additive was found to be dangerous to the environment. Who do environmentalists now want to blame for the problem? -- certainly not the ones who adopted the laws requiring the additive.


More broadly the limits on drilling and mining over the past several decades show no indication of reducing the consumption of energy in the United States. Because this is the case, regulations banning domestic extraction have simply increased global pollution by moving these activities to locations with far less deference to environmental protection than the United States. Whether Mexico, Nigeria, or the hundreds of oil tankers leaking across the oceans, the displaced production of fossil fuels has polluted the global environment far more than the impact of extraction here at home.


Our environmental jingoism turns a blind eye to how energy is produced outside the United States. For some reason, outsourcing our energy supplies just makes good common sense for our members of Congress that would not be caught in front of a camera outsourcing anything else.


The Congress is currently debating a bill to massively increase energy taxes on Americans with the promise of reducing global warming. Those taxes will fall disproportionately upon the poor. The deliberately higher energy prices sought by the bill hardly seem like a remedy for an allegedly weak economy. For a brighter American future on energy, Congressional members could help us all by looking less into the bright lights of TV cameras and taking a hard look in the political mirror.

Yes--I guess we are desparate-

We don't want to see the country under a Marxist Obama.

Either you agree with Obama's Marxist views and hate the country or you are stupid.

Even Bob Beckel is worried about the Whitey Tape on Michelle.

If he is worried--there is a high probablity that the tape exists.

And the media is in the tank for Obama--can't wait for all the egg on people's faces...

Obama/Clinton ticket.

It'll be interesting to watch the Republicans try to impeach the VP but keep the President.


It'll be interesting to watch Democrats that lean towards Hillary try to impeach President Obama to make her President. I wonder if the Republicans would try to block it.


What President Bill Clinton did with women (Monica) was a private matter and not something that should have led to him being impeached. It had nothing to do with the elected office of the President.

What Obama did with men (Wright) is a private matter and not something that should deny him the Presidency. It has nothing to do with the elected office of the President.

Again, really fucking desperate.

When they have to manipulate the primary process in a failed attempt to get the candidate they think they can beat, it is really desperate.

That's how you know they're worried...they started trotting out all manner of stupidity and half truths.

Posted by evilpolock


explain the half truth please

230 days left and counting.

230 days left and counting.

Scooter if you are going to cut and paste propaganda then at least give us the source.

What Obama did with men (Wright) is a private matter and not something that should deny him the Presidency. It has nothing to do with the elected office of the President.


that is the dumbest thing i have heard in a long time. so what obama believes in, what has shaped him as a man, a leader, a politician is unrelated?

wtf over

Either you agree with Obama's Marxist views

So what exactly is Obama planning on nationalising?
Which capitalist and bourgeousie's private property is he seizing to hand over to the proletariat?

Or is "Marxist" just Rush's word of the day? It might be a good idea to find out what a word means before you use it.

What Obama did with men (Wright) is a private matter and not something that should deny him the Presidency. It has nothing to do with the elected office of the President.



Posted by Petrous at 2008-06-03 12:26 PM


Really?

Polock,

Granted until the convention he is not the nominee, but for all real purposes he is, that is why they are trying to gain traction with this ACORN shit and the fictional Whitey tape.

Pathetic.

How about running a candidate on his accomplishments?

Looks like for all his promises to not go negative, McSame will flip flop his policy in a desperate attempt for power. Can't blame him though, his only shot is this year. McAncient cannot age another eight years and still be a viable candidate.

Hell he is not a viable candidate now, but he is what the RNC through under the bus. It just seems that they said.... "go get em John" knowing full well whoever was the nominee would not have a shot in hell this year.

Spelling Bee: Oh, numnah, that's different

blogs.usatoday.com

Larry Brown Sports has the video of our favorite speller at the Scripps National Spelling Bee over the weekend.

Sameer Mishra thought the word was numbnut (and so will you when you hear it).

"The NoI is very powerful on the south side and many are wondering what kind of deal Obama may have made with them."
No proof of anything like this...half truth or maybe even a lie.

"Tony Rezko, long time fund raiser and political mentor of Obama has personal ties to Farrakhan (you couldn't build a treehouse on the south side without the NoI's permission) and there has been speculation that Rezko could have been a go-between for the two (Obama not wanting to taint himself with the stench of Farrakhan's radical separatism and anti-semitism.)"
Again, speculation which equals at best a half truth or, another lie.

"Are we about to elect a president who has made common political cause with Marxists?"
Flat out lie. If you don't know that, you should not be allowed near a computer.

*While there, he paid back the New Party and the far left. He opposed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, he opposed legislation that would have prohibited the sale of pornography across the street from elementary schools and churches, and he supported allowing criminals to sue their victims if their victims injured the criminals in self-defense."
Flat out lie.

What more do ya need, pooter? 90% of the crap you post is speculation, or based on unnamed sources or right wing opinion.

Scooter if you are going to cut and paste propaganda then at least give us the source.

Posted by danni


so anything you dont believe, or agree with is propoganda.

american thinker and redstate.com

so please disprove it, not with anger filled bs either, prove he doesnt have these conections. if this were a repub they would be guilty if they were in the same state at the same time.

a belief that capitalism is based on the exploitation[4] of workers by the owners of capital

a belief that people's consciousness of the conditions of their lives reflects the dominant ideology which is in turn shaped by material conditions and relations of production

an understanding of class in terms of differing relations of production, and as a particular position within such relations

an understanding of material conditions and social relations as historically malleable

a view of history according to which class struggle, the evolving conflict between classes with opposing interests, structures each historical period and drives historical change

a belief that this dialectical historical process will ultimately result in a replacement of the current class structure of society with a system that manages society for the good of all,

resulting in the dissolution of the class structure and its support (more often than not including the nation state)

Sounds like Obama down the line--

He is the naked Marxist--hates the military, hates gun rights, hates people who make money--except for himself--

The only thing good about Obama is that he crushed the Clinton machine.

Too bad the Dems have traded one bad machine for the Daley Machine--equally if not worse for the country.

It has nothing to do with the elected office of the President.

Posted by Petrous at 2008-06-03 12:26 PM

Really?

Posted by MURPHY


Yeah really.

Sounds like Obama down the line--

He is the naked Marxist--hates the military, hates gun rights, hates people who make money--except for himself--


Perhaps you can post some links to these claims other than Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh.

Megadittoes.

What more do ya need, pooter? 90% of the crap you post is speculation, or based on unnamed sources or right wing opinion.

Posted by evilpolock


so what is your proof that what is said is a lie?
your word, you cant and wont make this go away using bully tactics, hate filled retorts and self proclaimed righteous denials.

Danni,

"Scooter if you are going to cut and paste propaganda then at least give us the source."
I believe his source is here.....

www.americanthinker.com

www.americanthinker.com

so what is your proof that what is said is a lie?


As soon as you can prove a negative let us know.

very good danni since i posted the sources per your request

so obama hasnt had any affiliation with the New Party?

Scoots,
So how does one go about proving something is not true?
By the way, "bully tactics, hate filled retorts and self proclaimed righteous denials." ain't my style.

as for the michelle obama whitey tape, the argument is she is saying or asking rather, why'd he? not whitey. why'd he take them off..... so i'm not holding my breath about what she said it is who is on stage/ pulpit with her.

Andrea,
That's nice but try providing some non far right sources...it gives your posts a little weight and validity.
I live near Chicago and the Chicago newspapers haven't exactly been Obamas friend. Surely you can find something they've dug up to prop up Scooters screeds.

i dont know you tell me, you are saying that their articles are lies, which means they arent true, so prove it.

I live near Chicago and the Chicago newspapers haven't exactly been Obamas friend. Surely you can find something they've dug up to prop up Scooters screeds.

Posted by evilpolock at 2008-06-03 12:57 PM |

Let's see... The Chicago newspapers smear his dem rival threatening to print portions of his divorce. Then go out to California and find a judge to unseal his opponents divorce records before the State election? That's what you call friendly? What is in the water in the Chicago area? I'll bet you thought Daley was clean as well?

evil,
for you to believe anything i guess it must come from a left wing outlet, so i guess there will be nothing to convince you. the main thing i dont get is how obvious his racism is, but the same barometer is never applied to your own as to your opponent.

oh and the bully tactics thing that was meant more for the obama campaign and media machine, than you. sorry my ability to concentrate for more than a minute or so is impossible, hence my short blasts and postings of articles

And thus the Democratic party is about to nominate a far left candidate in the tradition of George McGovern, albeit without McGovern's military and political record. The Democratic party is about to nominate a far-left candidate in the tradition of Michael Dukakis, albeit without Dukakis's executive experience as governor. The Democratic party is about to nominate a far left candidate in the tradition of John Kerry, albeit without Kerry's record of years of service in the Senate. The Democratic party is about to nominate an unvetted candidate in the tradition of Jimmy Carter, albeit without Jimmy Carter's religious integrity as he spoke about it in 1976. Questions about all these attributes (from foreign policy expertise to executive experience to senatorial experience to judgment about foreign leaders to the instructors he has had in his cultural values) surround Barack Obama. And the Democratic party has chosen him.



article.nationalreview.com

Here is the kicker--726--see if you can stay focused and read the whole article.

article.nationalreview.com

Crispee,
The Ryan affair was slimy...Ryan is slimy...republican behavior at its best. Yeah, if you want to do a threesome with your movie star wife in a public club, I think we need to know that. Or doesn't morality matter to you? I mean, you definitely seem to be a far righty...family value and all that hypocrisy. That sort of thing doesn't bother you?

The first portion of my post was from NRO Bill Bennett--

Scoots,
No, it doesn't need to be from a left wing source. Just give me something from somewhere that's at least a little neutral. The Thinker, the Review...all way far right publications. Surely if Obama is a Marxist, in cahoots with Farrakhan, wants to take all the republicans money, and wants to kill babies...more than right wing sources would be parroting this.

Yes--Evil--that is important--Ryan wanted to do something with his wife that Bill Clinton did not want to include HIllary...

But so is the Obama 20 year relationship with black separatists that hate America.

You folks know he was wants redistribution of wealth. He will tax everyone who works.

They are already planning to take over the oil companies de facto by taxing profits.

Maxine Waters let the cat out of the bag. We will be pineapple head's country Venezuela here in the USA--with this guy elected--if he is elected.

Yep, we are trying to nominate a relative unknown liberal. You got that right.
Because we have had 8 years of the right wings hero. President "wanted dead or alive", "bring em on", "mission accomplished", I wanna nominate my housekeeper to the supreme court, torture is good, I'll invade Iraq just cuz I want to, and we are in as bad a position as this country has ever been in. You guys had your chance, with full control of the government for 6 years, and butchered it beyond belief. It's someone elses turn.

Take over the oil companies? Where do you get this insanity? There is no way any president could ever effect that sort of thing.
It's that same stupid slippery slope argument about firearms. "If you want me to register my machine gun, next you'll be comin to take my huntin rifle away."

God, I hope you're right, Murph.

Here is the kicker--726--see if you can stay focused and read the whole article.

article.nationalreview.com

Posted by MURPHY at

well evil, what about this article? how can you not see him as a radical? are you going to disprove his(obama's) own words which he follow up on by not only more words but action?

Evil--Obama is for partial birth abortion.

He thinks pregnancy of a teenage girl is victimhood.

Why should they be "punished" by having a child out being married first. Those are his words.

Do your own homework. Google the words and find the site that suits your high ideals of a source. Heck--go to google and find Obama's bills that he has passed thru the Senate--draw your own conclusions.

He wants driver's licenses for illegal immigrants.

He wants gun control. He wants to expand the gov't--we are so critical of the Repubs--yeah--I have sent emails galore to these goofballs to get back on track and stop the spending and stop expanding the gov't.

I emailed Bush upteen times to get his red pen out and veto the shit --back when they were spending!

It is no different and worse with the Dems.

"""Either you agree with Obama's Marxist views and hate the country or you are stupid.."""

Wow. Not only are you desperate, you're fucking retarded.

Take over the oil companies? Where do you get this insanity? There is no way any president could ever effect that sort of thing.
It's that same stupid slippery slope argument about firearms. "If you want me to register my machine gun, next you'll be comin to take my huntin rifle away."

Posted by evilpolock


is he referring the female demo senator/congress woman who said a few weeks ago something about nationalizing the oil industry?

Murph,
It ain't my homework to do. If you have a point to make, provide the source.
I'm not going to spend time Googling stuff that came purely from people who are trying to sabotage this guys candidacy. As for the bills, there has never been a bill in the Illinois legislature purely to approve partial birth abortion.
Did you get pregnant at 13 or 14 or 16 years old? How can you speak to what it feels like for those girls? Maybe they did feel like it was a bad thing. I have two daughters and had they gotten pregnant at those ages, I can assure they wouldn't have been dancing at the thought. Everything he says gets twisted and spun til the right gets it just how they want it.

"I emailed Bush upteen times to get his red pen out and veto the shit --back when they were spending!"
This is nice...yet I'm betting you voted to re-elect him didn't ya? You were sooooo upset that he spent like an 18 year old with their first credit card.

It's not a good enough excuse to vote for this Obama guy because you think Bush is so bad. You have to judge this guy on his own merits and what he will do to this country.

Evil--go google Maxine Waters and oil profits--she was on the news last week?

She was on c-span--those are her words--they want to socialize the oil companies by taxing their profits in additon to taxing them 35%.

They want to tax the profits of a Company--oil companies.

Where does that lead to Evil?

It's not my company--so I don't care.

Then when they tax the next business and their profits--you won't care again.

Then they start taxing YOUR business and your profits--and wonder WTF is going on!!

The oil companies pay millions in taxes and it is never enough when you are a Marxist. It's not enough for the collective.

Yep, we are trying to nominate a relative unknown liberal. You got that right.


thank you, that is the message, or the truth that will keep him out of the white house. i almost wish he would win, to see the pain truth come out but i just cant wish that.

even better i want to see him go right in the national election!!

Evil--maybe you should understand that being pregnant--unless you were raped--is not a victim.

There are consequences to screwing around--one of which is getting pregnant.

See the difference?

And here Evil--since you are so cotton picking lazy!

search.yahoo.com

Go check out Maxine

1 - 10 of about 372,000 for maxine waters tax oil

"We don't want to see the country under a Marxist Obama."

Murphy, you wouldn't know a Marxist if Karl Marx himself rose from the dead, sat on your lap, twisted your titties, and bit your nose off.

I'd buy that for a dollar!

"what Obama did with men (Wright) is a private matter and not something that should deny him the Presidency. It has nothing to do with the elected office of the President.

that is the dumbest thing i have heard in a long time. so what obama believes in, what has shaped him as a man, a leader, a politician is unrelated?

Posted by scooter28054


What Wright said isn't what Obama said. What Wright believes in isn't what Obama believes in.

I have heard people state he should have left the church long ago. Well, after Clinton and his interns, everyone should have left the Democratic party. That guilt by association should apply to every member of the party. Catholics have pedophile priests, yet they haven't all left. That means those remaining are guilty by association?

Having people around you that are terrorists (according to Hannity's interpretation) means that you are evil. Does that mean Obama is a terrorist and believes as these individuals do?

I've heard the same thing said about Republicans.

JC Watts didn't agree with Hannity and really laid him out about month ago over the Wright issue and that other guy who made some bombs. Guilt association just doesn't fly.

Politicians are like Jesus. Hanging around criminals and prostitutes doesn't make you one. May not look good, but then if you intend to help people, you look for those that need it and associate with them. That's why Congress gathers together as a group regularly.


So much to reply to!
Whoa, whoa, whoa...is Maxine Waters running for president? Honest? Which party? Send me THAT link and I promise to goldbrick a few more minutes to read that one.
Murph, don't be nasty. I'm not lazy, just trying to do the employment thing...you do understand gainful employment, right? And as for the voting against someone remark...did you vote against Kerry or for Bush in 04? Or did you vote Nader in protest, which means a vote against someone.

Scoots, you sent:
"thank you, that is the message, or the truth that will keep him out of the white house. i almost wish he would win, to see the pain truth come out but i just cant wish that."

Brother, stop! You probably vote republican which means you voted for probably the most incompetent president ever. And I'm supposed to go the extra mile in vetting the candidate I support, just as you did not go the extra mile in 00 or 04? Priceless...the right will always be the party of the double standard.

Triple-overtime Penguin win - how sweet is that?

Whoo-hooo!~ 69th....my FAVORITE number!

77 you get 8 more.

He is the naked Marxist--hates the military

And yesterday the Right was bitching that he voted for funding for the troops.

Now where is McSame and Bush on the GI Bill? Friggin' commies....

"Now where is McSame and Bush on the GI Bill?"


Probably redrafting the gi bill the dems including obama quashed.

In common with Wright, Obama had deep misgivings about America's criminal justice system.

Oh dear God, not misgivings about the criminal justice system.

Oh dear God, not a system that lets OJ committ murder, yet sends to death row innocent poor people?

Oh dear God. Well that changes my whole opinion of Obama!{sarcasm flag}

Murphy, you wouldn't know a Marxist if Karl Marx himself rose from the dead, sat on your lap, twisted your titties, and bit your nose off.

Posted by nullifidian at 2008-06-03 01:43 PM
ABUSIVE OFFENSIVE

Now where is McSame and Bush on the GI Bill? Friggin' commies....


Redrafting it to require 37 years of service before the Army will pay for c-rations.

P.S....and don't talk to Murphy in that manner again you little creep.

What Wright said isn't what Obama said. What Wright believes in isn't what Obama believes in.
Petrous

That may be true--so far we haven't heard the exact words from Obama's mouth.

But --and I mean no disrespect Petrous--do you attend church--regular church?

If you had in the past or now attending--you know that attending a church--you are in sync with the beliefs of that church.

And you would definitely be in agreement when you attended that church for say the LAST 20 YEARS!!

And Obama does agree or lacks such judgment that makes him wholly unqualified to be POTUS.

Obama had both Wright and Pflegar on his Spiritual Adivory COmmittee of his CAMPAIGN.

He sent 200k earmark for Pflegars' church--=payback.

SO don't give me this doe in the woods BS that Obama didn't say this hatred and this racists BS--so it's not him and not important to this country in making a decision about this guy.

The church is in Obama's heart and soul--that is why he went there and was married by Wright and baptized his girls==they are apart of this church and the beliefs expoused. They agree with the Wright and Pflegar--you betcha'!

He is up to his eyeballs in this crap. Now he is lying about it and NO ONE WILL ASK THE QUESTIONS--the MSM is in the tank for this phony baloney POS.

"And you would definitely be in agreement when you attended that church for say the LAST 20 YEARS!"

So does that mean Rudy Guiliani agrees with priests diddling altar boys?

So does that mean Rudy Guiliani agrees with priests diddling altar boys?

Posted by Danforth


Yes, he is a republican :-(

Actually it would mean he agrees if that behavior was defended from the pulpit.

by your example, anybody who goes to a church where someone in the clergy stepped out of line must "agree" with those practices

If Rudy's priest of his church was doing kids and Rudy kept going to the church after knowing this--he would be a POS.

And you guys would have a phucking field day...

But not for the messiah--another free pass.

You are fooling yourselves. The man is not going to win in November and you are all going to call the country racists for not electing the wholly unqualified Obama--without character without judgment and without any experience to run the country.

But blame it on Bush!! What deflection!

And another thing on the MSM--

The AP is in the tank --it was soooo blatent this morning when the AP came out and First said Hillary was going to concede tonight.

Then that story was quashed when the CLinton folks came out and said adamently that she was not conceding.

Then the AP comes out and proclaims that Obama eccentially had the number of delegates and WON the nomination!

What is so incredible is that THERE IS A PRIMARY GOING ON TODAY!

He still doesn't have the number--he will likely get them later on tonight.

But for the AP to announce that HRC was conceding to try to affect a primary is atrocious and BS and

I can't even stand HIllary!

Oh and they want to now reach out to the Clinton campaign.!! Through Pineda who is not even in the circle of HRC! What is up with this guy--Gripe and poke her in the eye over 4 friggin MI delegates and now this..

Wait for November--women voters are going to defect the Dem Party and go for McCain.

Even if it is only 3 million women voters--they will defect.

Posted by Danforth at 2008-06-03 03:57 PM

And you would definitely be in agreement when you attended that church for say the LAST 20 YEARS!"

Well, there wasn't such blatant political, racist, and hate rhetoric. The message was rather bland. You detect symmetry? What a stretch. I'd bet on the standing provided by your score on an analogy test if this accurately depicts your mentation.
So does that mean Rudy Giuliani agrees with priests diddling altar boys?

Let's see, did the sermons in the Catholic Church urge parishioners to engage in homosexual behavior, be pederasts? I don't think so. That your mind can even conceive of Obama's being mentored by the hate-mongering pastor, and Giuliani's attendance of mass as a parishioner boggles most minds. But apparently the mind of a leftist can conceive and accommodate bizarre ideation.

Posted by Danforth at 2008-06-03 03:57 PM

And you would definitely be in agreement when you attended that church for say the LAST 20 YEARS!"

Well, there wasn't such blatant political, racist, and hate rhetoric. The message was rather bland. You detect symmetry? What a stretch. I'd bet on the standing provided by your score on an analogy test if this accurately depicts your mentation.
So does that mean Rudy Guiliani agrees with priests diddling altar boys?

Let's see, did the sermons in the Catholic Church urge parishioners to engage in homosexual behavior, be pederasts? I don't think so. That your mind can even conceive of Obama's being mentored by the hate-mongering pastor, and Giuliani's attendance of mass as a parishioner boggles most minds. But apparently the mind of a leftist can conceive and accommodate bizarre ideation.

"ABUSIVE OFFENSIVE
Posted by MURPHY at 2008-06-03 03:10 PM |"

I heard Rogers is working on a FUCKING STUPID flag. It will be known as "The Murphy Default."

Liberalism is a mental disorder. The left in this country are trying their damnest to ruin it.

Most are incapable of thinking critically about anything.

And another thing on the MSM--

The AP is in the tank --it was soooo blatent this morning when the AP came out and First said Hillary was going to concede tonight.

Then that story was quashed when the CLinton folks came out and said adamently that she was not conceding.

Then the AP comes out and proclaims that Obama eccentially had the number of delegates and WON the nomination!


A friend said he read over on MSNBC's political blog that there is speculation that Clinton's campaign said she would concede and then claimed she didn't so that more of her supporters would get mad at the media and go out and vote today. IOW, Camp Clinton played the media and then denied doing so. Could be. It wouldn't be the first time a politician used the media to try to get what they want.

Thanks Doc--my browser doesn't let me choose the button.

But go on ahead cupcake and flame something else.

This time try to be intelligent.

That is not what the AP reported--then they pulled the story--oops!

This was done to suppress voter turn out.

Hear it and why go vote.

Well-speaking of which I get to go vote again today--we don't get to vote for the POTUS--that was done in Feb 5th

We get another day to vote--today for Props and some other officials.

And Arnold can't waste enough money by having two election days.

P.S. I was over at HIllary's official website and on the blog there folks where pretty fired up at what they thought the media had done. Lots of folks said they were going to make calls to voters in primary states, superdelegates, radio stations, etc. Many said they were going to donate to her campaign. The Clintons have known how to run against the media for a long time now. It wouldn't surprise me if they pulled a fast one in order to garner much needed support by making her supporters outraged. Relying on voter outrage has worked pretty well for them during the campaign.

Larry--

Game 2 tonight between AZ and Texas

ESPN 2--starts 5:00 CA Time

AZ won last night 3-0.

AZ is favored--it will be a terrific game. Rooting for Texas the underdog.

Love to see a game 3..

The Obama crowd are not shy when it comes to manipulating the elcection process with blatant lies, such as "the Hillary withdrawing story." She was apparently winning a massive victory in one of the states at least, so the media which since Watergate has inserted itself as a player in the political process, intervened to prevent or at least mitigate the bad result for Obama.

AP is in the tank for Obama.

The mill of the Clintons, it grindeth slow, but it grind exceeding fine. There is no wrath like that of a Clinton scorned. The fat lady hasn't sung yet.

Will the Clintons adopt a scorched earthy policy? "Born to lose, I've lived my life in vain ...," will not be Ms Hillary's swan song. The female of the species is more deadly than the male.

Let's see how the Democrat "Big Tent" holds itself up. Hispanics and "mayates" are at odds with some very real and even deadly antagonisms surfacing between them. The Hispanics are replacing blacks as the nation's largest minority. Women, a significant Democrat constituency, are angry with Obama. Jews fear Obama and his anti-Israel background and anti-Semitic associations. Will they break away? Working people are disenchanted with the elites who mock them and their attachment to guns and religion. Older Americans are grounded in a social order that does not install blacks in positions of superiority. And Southerners ... oh well. West Virginia. West Virginia redux.

I hear that canvas stretching. Will the tent endure? Will the circle of the Democrat community be unbroken.

Oh I am not missing it for anything Murphy. I am hooked. Too bad they don't have a mixed tourniment. I might even sign up to play for that. I want Arizona to Win Myself. If You want a third game Murphy I will root for Texas A & M tonight. Love the game.

Larry Mohr

Posted by MURPHY at 2008-06-03 03:53 PM |

"That may be true--so far we haven't heard the exact words from Obama's mouth."
Murphy, we have heard what Obama believes. If you haven't heard his speeches, then YOU haven't heard.

"If you had in the past or now attending--you know that attending a church--you are in sync with the beliefs of that church."
BS - people attending church don't believe everything they hear nor the doctrine of the church they attend. They're all in sync? No, they are not. Just like politicians that take a path different than their party - it happens all the time. Guilt by association doesn't fly.

"And you would definitely be in agreement when you attended that church for say the LAST 20 YEARS!!"

and again, BS. You have members of the Democratic party that have been for over 20 years. Being a member of the party doesn't make you beholden to the leadership of the party's beliefs. Look at voting records - they don't tow the line every time. They have a conscience and sometime go against the grain. Guilt by association doesn't fly.

"And Obama does agree or lacks such judgment that makes him wholly unqualified to be POTUS."

BS. You're talking agreeing 100% without Obama making a statement of fact. This is your guess.
Wholly unqualified to be POTUS? No one is WHOLLY qualified to be POTUS.

"Obama had both Wright and Pflegar on his Spiritual Advisory Committee of his CAMPAIGN."
And your point is? Guilty by association, right? Because these two are nuts in your opinion that they have no worth. That they can only be poison. That's your assessment.

"He sent 200k earmark for Pflegars' church--=payback." Payback? You suggesting criminal intent.

"SO don't give me this doe in the woods BS that Obama didn't say this hatred and this racists BS--so it's not him and not important to this country in making a decision about this guy."

He didn't say it. That's your problem. He didn't say it. Others did. But, you'll blame him for associating with them. It's the same mentality of "one bad Repub/Demo, they're all bad." Next we'll hear that one bad Drudgie=all bad Drudgies.

"The church is in Obama's heart and soul--that is why he went there and was married by Wright and baptized his girls==they are apart of this church and the beliefs expoused. They agree with the Wright and Pflegar--you betcha'!"

That's your opinion. But, it doesn't agree with Obama's actions nor his words. You measure a man's worth by the statements of others but not by his own words and actions?

"He is up to his eyeballs in this crap. Now he is lying about it and NO ONE WILL ASK THE QUESTIONS--the MSM is in the tank for this phony baloney POS."

I agree. It is crap.

Soon, we'll be discussing McCain and the wars he'll take us into if elected. Obama will discuss not going to war and raises our taxes.

What do you want to give up for your country?
Money or lives?

Murphy,

Did you catch the little clip from The View today? Whoopi Goldberg, reading from something fresh off the wire, solemnly announces Hillary Clinton will concede tonight. Barbara Walters says, "This mean Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee. . . .." But wait! Whoopi gets handed a statement from the Clinton campaign saying she has not conceded. Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not.

So let me get this straight: You'll condemn one church's rhetoric, despite the fact there are no correlating racist actions, yet you'll give a pass to another church's actions, and all because they didn't promote their actions---the diddling of children---from the pulpit...?!?

Un-frickin'-believable.

Don't Johnson and Murphy make rather good shoes?

How come they have time for all this crap, or do they do it while hammering at their lasts?


www.johnstonmurphy.com

Is anybody watching McCain's speech? He looks terrible these days.

a1259.g.akamai.net

I'll admit, McCain has looked better, my friends.

i48.photobucket.com

McCain's audience sure is looking dumb as well.

www.freewebtown.com

Is anybody watching McCain's speech? He looks terrible these days.

Posted by nullifidian

Just because he's more pale than your boy doesn't mean shit.

What a condescending ass. And, did they smear the left side of his face with greasepaint or something?


What a condescending ass....

Posted by nullifidian at 2008-06-03 08:47 PM


Boy, you could not have nailed it better in one word than to call McCain's speech "condescending."

I'm watching McCain him now and he speaks as though he's talking to a group of 3 graders. And if he says "my friends" one...more...time....

Can you imagine listening to him for four years!

This has to be the worst McCain speech I've ever heard. What a smarmy, phoney with the creepiest smile you've ever seen.

When this guy stands next to Obama on a debate stage, it will be all over. McCain will make Nixon in his JFK debate look like a GQ model.

I am watching the speech. He's pretty awful. Coming across as mean and uninspired. Plus he really sucks at speaking from a script.

Can't wait for Obama to debate him.

rofl!

This has to be the worst McCain speech I've ever heard. What a smarmy, phoney with the creepiest smile you've ever seen.

I almost wrote that exact thing.

MSNBC declares Obama the presumptive democratic nominee.

"I'm watching McCain him now and he speaks as though he's talking to a group of 3 graders"

Spot on, Chris.

It's no surprise all the networks have given him the hook. They could hear remotes clicking across the country. lol

Fuck all of you. That's not change we can beleive in...

You can't afford me, WISGOD.

When McCain smiles God kills a kitten.

When McCain smiles God kills a kitten.

Posted by Alexandrite

When McCain smiles, he looks like he's jerking off.

Well I guess that would be a good look for an oldie but goodie...

Clinton won South Dakota--wasn't Obama supposed to win??

When McCain smiles God kills a kitten.

That's so sick so why am I laughing so hard?

Didn't Clinton sweep these last elections?

She's still fighting for the superdelegates.

The fat lady hasn't sung yet.

Obama isn't coronated.

What's happening?

MSNBC declares Obama the presumptive democratic nominee.

Now MSNBC thinks that it's the fat lady.

Alex

That was brilliant.

Thanks

The right in this nooner has given a whole new to "beside itself." They froth at the mouth seeking something - ANYthing - ugly about the most promising presidential candidate in four years.

Then they realize that they don't even have a decent smear against him, and only a weak, lack-luster Bush echo who not only may not make a decent speech in the next six months but may not LAST the next six months. herm

I meant 48, not four years. You knew that. herm

CONGRATULATIONS ARIZONA SUN DEVILS YESSSSSSSSSSSS 11 to zip.

Larry Mohr

McCain is not the brightest bulb on the tree. He has a temper. He's inept. Choosing McClain would be analogous to standing near a cesspool and smelling the stench.

With all of Obama's deficits, choosing Obama would be like diving into the cesspool and drinking and eating the contents.

Obama has even less credibility than Ms Hillary when she related her combat experience.

You wonder why Obama is either so confused or such a pathological and stupid liar. His uncle liberated Auschwitz and sulked for in the attic for months because of what he had seen. Actually, the Russians liberated Auschwitz. His father came to the U.S. on a Kennedy inspired program. His father came to the U.S. the previous year. Obama was conceived as a result of a romance connected with black liberation, the Selma march. The march occurred in 1963, was it, and Obama was born in 1961, a couple of years previously. Oh, and the 57 states bit is another.

What is it with this guy? What malfunction causes him to make these misstatements. Why does he need to create a false persona based on obvious lies. Does he have merited feelings of inferiority?

The lies are so stupid and so certain to be uncovered, you wonder what mental and/or emotional defect causes him to utter them.

Does anyone have any idea what may cause this stream of palpable and easily identified mistruths to issue from Obama?

Johnson,
You are going to stoop to calling those "lies"? I don't agree with you on issues, but I used to give you more credit than that. You're just a hack, I guess.

" WASHINGTON -- Sen. Hillary Clinton, who refused to concede after Sen. Barack Obama claimed the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, will do so Friday, two top advisers said. Close supporters suggested she would like to be his running mate, on a unity ticket.

But close advisers to Sen. Obama signaled an Obama-Clinton ticket was highly unlikely. People in both camps cited what several called "a deal-breaker" -- Bill Clinton may balk at releasing records of his business dealings and big donors to his presidential library."

Posted by herm at 2008-06-03 11:32 PM

The right in this nooner has given a whole new to "beside itself." They froth at the mouth seeking something - ANYthing - ugly about the most promising presidential candidate in four years.

Promising? Promising what?

What has Obama promised that's tangible, and how will it be accomplished?

What has he delivered during his lifetime? He worked on the South Side of Chicago. It's still the South Side of Chicago with all of the negative aspects of life there.

He was in the Illinois legislature, and all he did was set up supporters in taxpayer funded businesses with them taking off the top, men such as Father Pfleger and Rev. Wright, who ostensibly conduct charitable operations, but who are really running businesses funded by taxpayer money, and collecting beneftis from such funding, all the while pretending that these are their charitable efforts.

What legislation has he initiated that is of any moment?

What does Obama promise? What makes you think he can deliver anything based on his track recotd to date, which only shows him as a corrupt recipient of personal benefits, such as the $300,000 from Rezko, who was by the way convicted. Will Revko drop another shoe, outing and implicating Obama in return for leniency?
Then they realize that they don't even have a decent smear against him ... herm

Who needs a smear for a fellow whose mentor indoctrinated him in racial hate-mongering for more than 20 years with a hate-America, hate-whitey, hate-Jews agenda, which Obama found congenial for that duration. What about his hate-whitey, never before liked American wife? What about Obama's days as a rabble rousing hate-monger fostering and fomenting racial hatred on the streets as an Alinsky organizer. What about his Revko relationship and receipt of payoffs? What about his earmarks for radical groups.

And Obama says that that he will stop the seas from rising, something that's been occurring since 1792, was it, associated with passing of the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age. Does this jerk think that he's King Canute? How connected with reality is he?

Yes herm, there's no need for smears when the truth is so devastating a weapon against Obama. To know Obama is to reject him.


Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable