Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, May 16, 2008

WATERTOWN, S.D. -- Sen. Barack Obama told residents of this farming town of 20,000 that he welcomed the idea of turning the presidential contest into a debate on who is better fit to guide the nation's foreign policy. "If George Bush and John McCain want to have a debate about protecting America, that is a debate I will have any time, any place," he said to a cheering crowd. "George Bush and John McCain have a lot to answer for."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Obama and McCain both said they would welcome a debate on the matter.

The first questions will likely be something on the order of, "Did you really call your wife a trollup?" and "Were you in the pews when your pastor said God Damn America?"

New GOP slogan is also antidepressant trademark!

rawstory.com

Washington Republicans are taking a marketing-themed approach to their 2008 campaigning, reports MSNBC Congressional correspondent Mike Viqueira.

The slogan the GOP has chosen to use may indeed indicate how "glum" the party has become, especially after the loss of a special Congressional election in Mississippi to a Democrat on Tuesday. As Viqueira points out with amusement, the slogan now in use to sell the "GOP brand" in 2008 is the same as the one that drug giant Wyeth has trademarked to sell its antidepressant Effexor.

The dem's say any dissent is divisive, yet they have constantly dissented against gw for years. What is the difference???/

I admit I am a progressive, but nonetheless I see this as a very powerful talking point:

"Obama then launched into list of grievances, including a war fought on the premise of uprooting weapons of mass destruction that were never found, the failure to catch Osama Bin Laden and turning Iran into the "greatest beneficiary" of the Iraq war."

I just don't see how McCain can dance around those things, if he is put on the spot in a debate, and not permitted to just avoid the question.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

....or, how about, were you sane when you decided to invade Iraq?...and, where you lying then or now about the reason we went into that quagmire?...or, exactly whose freedom and security did 4000 of our boys die for?

Sounds like obama is full of divisiveness, doesn't it?

We can "change", just don't DARE ask how!

who gives a fuck about the pastor or whether McShame callled his wife a trollop and cunt when 4000 of our soldiers died and upwards of 35000 have come home maimed.

New GOP slogan is also antidepressant trademark!

after the last eight years most of us need antidepressants now anyway so I guess it is fitting.



The first questions will likely be something on the order of, "Did you really call your wife a trollup...

Or perhaps "since you are not wearing a flag pin how do we know you are you a patriotic American and not really a Muslim planning on secretly enslaving the white race?

I watched his town meeting, not one idea accept, he's against gw's policies. his approach to Iran is EXACTLY what we've been doing for years. he doesn't have a single thought on what to do if Iran doesn't respond to sanctions NOT ONE....

"who gives a fuck about the pastor or whether McShame callled his wife a trollop and cunt when 4000 of our soldiers died and upwards of 35000 have come home maimed."

Posted by geezer1


The moderators of the debates might.

What is the difference???/

Posted by DavetheWave


because the guy making the decisions is a retarded idiot.

You know--if you listen to the speech from Bush--

All appeasers have been discredited by history.

He could have been talking about everyone who ever appeased--and he did not say anyone's names or party.

He could have been talking about the EU and UN! And they admitted that Obama could be included with the appeasers of history.

Instead of Obama taking the opportunity to agree with Bush and say that appeasment is not a working policy--then expound on his own policy of what he believes--he chose to be shown the naivete that he is --

How is he going to prevent Iran from getting s nuke bomb?

Neville Chamberlain--with his good intentions was an appeaser to Hilter when he went over there and tried to talk "peace for our times"--Hitler was emboldened because he knew the US would not do anything and continued on his march and conquer.

Obama is well intentioned--but his naivete is stark and lacks any understanding of our history and how to deal with these types of dictators and evil people.

And that is why Obama and the Dems got all twisted and their panties in a wad --why is that?

Because they are the party of appeasers-right now at this point in time--for the last 20 years or more---and Obama has put it out there like 40-50 times that he would sit down with Iran or anyone with out preconditions.

Oh--let's have human rights--ok Iran doesn't have human right problems--we all know they don't have gays in their society...

And now Obama adds to the list from his large ears to calling him out on his lack of foreign policy experience and judgment--that no one can talk about--because he says so --it's too divisive.

Well no shit Sherlock! That's what eloections are about--being divisive. The issues are divisive, the realities are divisive!

Obama is naive and utterly unprepared to be POTUS.

Murphy

Oh that's not divisive? When you can't answer a question without an insult, you must have NOTHING to say!

The moderators of the debates might.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE


..and what makes them right????? They're just pandering to the lowest common denominator. Everyone talks about supoporting the troops but then they get bogged down in questions of pastors and flag pins and haircuts, etc.etc. The only things we should be talking about is why we are in Iraq and Afghanistan, the economy and the welfare of the American people. Everything else is just crap.

Frmo the articel: "Obama called the comments "dishonest, divisive attacks."


Does he always whine the word "divisive" whenever he is confronted? Of COURSE it's divisive.... the Repubs are trying to divide him in half, just like he is trying to divide them! Or is "divisive" a code word for "attacking me because of my race".? He's in a political campaign, running for president. Why does he consistently seem surprised when he is called out by members of the opposing party? He's beginning to come off as something of a smooth boy.

Posted by MURPHY

gee Murph....who's been appeasing Kim Jong Il in North Korea for the last eight years? And, BTW, maybe you should email Gates and Rice who said the same thing Obama said about talking to foreign leaders instead of blindly going into the muck and making an ass out of yourself.

So now the dr left is against afghanistan too?? That's not what obama is saying!

even Bush doesn't care what Obama says. about the only thing certain is that Bush is also counting how many days left he has in office.

"And now Obama adds to the list from his large ears ....

Posted by MURPHY at 2008-05-16 05:36 PM"

Oh poor Murphy - whines because she can't make fun of Obama's ears. And just when she planned to raise the level of the debate...

Posted by SE4NY6969

all you pussies were screaming bloody murder when the Dixie Chicks, on an english stage, basically said they were not proud that Bush was from Texas yet you defend Bush when he criticizes Obama and the dems in Israel. Why didn't he say those things when he was here? He had plenty of opportunity to look like an idiot as usual here. He did it to pander to the state of Israel and to the Israeli people. It just shows that on top of being a dolt he is also an asshole.

"..and what makes them right?????"

Posted by geezer1


Didn't say they were. You'd know that if you weren't a senile old geezer.

Obama should and could have said there never would have been a third reich and Nazi party if not for American bankers like the current POTUS grandad, Prescott.

Funny why you won't answer a simple straight forward question MW

Who is MW?


So now the dr left is against afghanistan too?? That's not what obama is saying!

Posted by DavetheWave


You are a class A moron. If Bush hadn't invaded Iraq and pulled all those troops from Afghanistan, our war there would be going much better if at all. Instead we are losing ground every day while the taliban are regrouping and taking more and more land and growing more and more poppies for heroin. Great job, right?

Didn't say they were. You'd know that if you weren't a senile old geezer.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE


at least all my part work, including my brain. Something you have not experienced yet.

Obama is well intentioned--but his naivete is stark and lacks any understanding of our history and how to deal with these types of dictators and evil people.

Posted by MURPHY at 2008-05-16 05:36 PM |


Oh Really ?

The GOP Has Become Such A Lot Of Liars And Hypocrites !!

In a speech in Washington on Friday night, US President George Bush promised Libya's "good faith" would be rewarded.

Rewards

Colonel Gaddafi said in a statement his country wanted to take the lead "in building a new world free of weapons of mass destruction and all kinds of terrorism, with the aim of preserving international peace and security and progress for humanity".


news.bbc.co.uk

Gates says U.S. wants diplomacy to solve Iran disputes
April 5, 2008

MUSCAT (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates reaffirmed to the leader of Oman on Saturday that Washington wanted to resolve its disputes with Iran diplomatically, a senior U.S. defense official said.

Governments in the Gulf are concerned that tensions between the United States and Iran could lead to a military conflict.

But Gates told Oman's Sultan Qaboos bin Said that "although we keep all options open with regards to Iran, we remain committed to a diplomatic solution," the official told reporters on the Pentagon chief's flight back to Washington.

abcnews.go.com


Rice Pushes for Renewed North Korea Talks

archive.newsmax.com

Now You Know Why The GOP Now Lives With This:


Trust on Issues
Democrats Trusted More on All Ten Electoral Issues Tracked by Rasmussen Reports
Tuesday, May 13, 2008 Email to a FriendAdvertisment
American voters now trust the Democrats on all ten key electoral issues tracked regularly by Rasmussen Reports. Last month, the GOP's had an advantage on two issues.

Not surprisingly, the economy is still seen as the most important issue in this year's presidential campaign--76% of voters say it is a Very Important issue. The Democrats now have a 14-point advantage over the Republicans on this issue, up from eight-points a month ago. Data from the Rasmussen Consumer Index shows that consumer confidence is currently hovering near record lows. Not only is confidence low, three-out-of-four Americans believe that economic conditions are getting worse.

www.rasmussenreports.com


The GOP Has Been Losing And Will Continue

-Sarge

Didn't say they were. You'd know that if you weren't a senile old geezer.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

The moderators of the debates might.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

What is that post supposed to be?...a statement that you are either a liar or retarded?

"at least all my part work, including my brain."

Posted by geezer1


I just love self retorting retorts!

"because the guy making the decisions is a retarded idiot."

That goes double for EVERYONE running in this election.

"What is that post supposed to be?...a statement that you are either a liar or retarded?"
--GEEZER1


Damn dude, you really are a moron.

I was making fun of the questions moderators might ask the candidates in a debate, I never said it was good or right for them to do that.

What is the statistic on seniors having severe stupidity?

Neville Chamberlain--with his good intentions was an appeaser to Hilter when he went over there and tried to talk "peace for our times"--Hitler was emboldened because he knew the US would not do anything and continued on his march and conquer.

Obama is well intentioned--but his naivete is stark and lacks any understanding of our history and how to deal with these types of dictators and evil people.

And that is why Obama and the Dems got all twisted and their panties in a wad --why is that?

Because they are the party of appeasers-right now at this point in time--for the last 20 years or more---and Obama has put it out there like 40-50 times that he would sit down with Iran or anyone with out preconditions.


Posted by MURPHY at 2008-05-16 05:36 PM | Reply | Fla

Another rightard who doesn't know the meaning of the word 'appeasement'.

Did you know that Neville Chamberlain was ENGLISH!!!

He wasn't from the US and his 'Appeasement' was a true appeasement in that he GAVE SOMETHING OR CONCEDED SOMETHING TO SOMEONE. In this case, with his signing of the Munich Agreement in 1938, he conceded part of Czechoslovakia to Hitler. In the same year he also gave up the Irish Free State Royal Navy ports.

OH. ONE MORE THING! NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN WAS A CONSERVATIVE!!

NOW THAT'S APPEASEMENT.

Saying "If only I could have talked to Hitler" is NOT APPEASEMENT, no matter how you 'tards try to spin it.

Keep trying though. It makes you look brilliant!

Obama is well intentioned--but his naivete is stark and lacks any understanding of our history and how to deal with these types of dictators and evil people.

And Bush has shown his deep knowledge and understanding of history and how to deal with dictators.

Lets see, first you give the dictator weapons of mass destruction (via Rummy) so they can use them on their own people and neighbors then, you scream foul and rush in and kill him to get back those weapons of mass destruction that YOU gave him only to find that OOPS they are all gone!

Yeah such a deep understanding there...

Give it up Murphy...

"all you pussies were screaming bloody murder when the Dixie Chicks, on an english stage, basically said they were not proud that Bush was from Texas yet you defend Bush when he criticizes Obama and the dems in Israel. "

Difference is, Bush didn't go on TV and whine like a miffed and swift-boated John Kerry about what bad cricket this whole Nazi brouhaha is. And Bush does not have the race card to play that Obama keeps throwing out whenever he is cornered -- Obama's use of the "divisive" word is reaching Johnny Cochran-like proportion. I'm pretty sure Kim Jong-il won't back off if Obama starts getting all girly about KJI being "divisive".

Hey Murph,

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
(St. Louis, Missouri)
January 5, 2004

TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT
TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE

January 5, 2004

Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent the enclosed notice, stating that the Libya emergency is to continue in effect beyond January 7, 2004, to the Federal Register for publication. The most recent notice continuing this emergency was published in the Federal Register on January 6, 2003 (68 Fed. Reg. 661).

On September 12, 2003, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1506 (UNSCR 1506), ending the U.N. sanctions against Libya. These U.N. sanctions were imposed in 1992 and 1993 as a result of Libyan involvement in the terrorist bombings of Pan Am 103 and UTA 772, and included travel restrictions, an arms embargo, and financial sanctions. The UNSCR 1506 lifted these sanctions after Libya addressed the requirements of the relevant UNSC Resolutions, including making arrangements to compensate the families of the victims and accepting responsibility for the acts of its officials in the bombing of Pan Am 103. The United States abstained from voting on the lifting of the U.N. sanctions, and it made clear that it continued to have serious concerns about other Libyan policies and actions, including Libya's pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, Libya's role with regard to terrorism, and Libya's poor human rights record.

On December 19, 2003, Prime Minister Blair and I announced separately that Libya's leader, Colonel Muammar Qadhafi, had agreed to eliminate all elements of Libya's chemical and nuclear weapons program, declare all nuclear activities to the Inter-national Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), accept international inspections to ensure Libya's complete adherence to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and sign the IAEA Additional Protocol, accede to the Chemical Weapons Convention, eliminate ballistic missiles beyond 300 kilometer range, and immediately and unconditionally allow inspectors from international organizations to enter Libya. Libya's agreement marks the beginning of a process that can lead to Libya rejoining the international community, but its declaration of December 19, 2003, must be followed by verification of concrete steps.

Despite the positive developments, the crisis with respect to Libya has not been fully resolved, and I have therefore determined that it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared with respect to Libya and maintain in force the comprehensive sanctions against Libya.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH

(end text)

(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)

www.globalsecurity.org


Wow Holy Shit !!!

Mr Straw echoed Tony Blair's applause :


"Colonel Omar Gaddafi"

"He has shown huge statesmanship in doing this.

"We all know Libya's history but you judge people on their conduct and, knowing as I do the course of these negotiations, I think it is both statesmanlike and courageous, the steps that he and his government have taken."

A spokesman for the families of British people killed in the Lockerbie bombing, welcomed the development as a chance to salvage some good from the atrocity.

news.bbc.co.uk

The GOP Really Have Become Nothing But A Lot Of Ridiculous Bunch Of Hypocrites And Liars !

-Sarge

According to Godwin's Law Bush already lost this "debate".

Yes--Common

And the idiot who said if only he could talk with Hilter all of this could have been avoided.

He was a repub from Idaa US Senator.

Appeasers come in all shapes and sizes and parties.

Obama happens to be one as well--so he talks like one.

Even Hillary called him out on it--but now that she has lost the nomination--she comes to his defense--so she can get her 20 million refunded before the convention.

Appeasers--now can't talk about that anymore--he grinded Maureen Dowd over her making fun of his ears--she said she was trying to toughen him up..

Can't talk about a lot of things this election season.

It's all too divisive.

And let's deflect--what is he going to talk to Iran Iminthemoodforjihad? How is he going to get him to stop his nuke program--??

Oh--Oh--I know--recommend the same things that is already being done by this admin!

Too funny!

Murphy




Neville Chamberlain--with his good intentions was an appeaser to Hilter when he went over there and tried to talk "peace for our times"--Hitler was emboldened because he knew the US would not do anything and continued on his march and conquer.



What an idiot. Do you think Chamberlain was an American?

Talking peace is not appeasement. Do you any ANY f-ing clue what you're talking about, because it surely doesn't show.

Do you HAVE any f-ing clue

Murphy

So you think we should just bomb the shit out of people with no discussion--no talks.

And you vote.


sad

for

America.

Murphy allow me to apologize for MIDIMAN and COMMONSENSE (what an oxymoron handle) they're so lathered (as Libs tend to be) they don't comprehend your Chamberlain (as an analogy to 0bama) in NO WAY suggests that he was an American just that Hitler knew when he pulled the rug from under Chamberlain the U.S. would not do anything of consequence. Much like Iran, the Hamas, Al-qaeda et al. will walk all over 0bama knowing he'll blink (if not drop his pants and bend over)

Yes--Chamberlain was a Brit--but he was an appeaser to Hitler.

My goodness--you think Obama and Dems have the corner market on appeasers?!!

No!!

They come from all countries and parties and everywhere--Duh!

Murphy

GimmeaScotchandSomeBalls

Hitler had an army . Small detail, but significant. Get back to your pants pissing, you coward. How many have to die before you feel safe?

My goodness--you think Obama and Dems have the corner market on appeasers?!!

What Chamberlain free grant are they offering to Hammas?

What makes them appeasers?

Are you suggesting that Al-qaeda isn't a de facto army BaffledBob?

And if you're so concerned about me peeing in my pants stop hogging all the Depends.

Yav

Do you really expect a response?

Bob,

I guess not. It's just one of those little reality things. I was just going over the 1938 Munich agreement. Just in case.

Also going over McCain's statements on Hammas, Syria (and his support for sending Colin Powell to 'appease' them when they were declared a "state sponsor of terrorism", etc. etc. etc.


Are you suggesting that Al-qaeda isn't a de facto army BaffledBob?

And if you're so concerned about me peeing in my pants stop hogging all the Depends.

Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch at 2008-05-16 08:23 PM | Reply


I am not suggesting anything. I am SAYING Al Qaeda has no army--Iran has no arny--no one in the middle East has an army that compares with our firepower. No army can stand in the field against us. Iran and the other countries can SAY they have armies, but they would stand as long as Saddams army stood against us.

I am SAYING Al Qaeda has no army that they can put in the field against us. I am SAYING they are a bunch of criminals in a criminal organizarion and their "army" is no more of an army than the Mafia or Black Hand or Yakuza.

I am SAYING you can't fight that kind of army with a real, regular army. WQasting lives trying to fight that kind of army with our armed forces is a waste of our brave troops. The only way to fight that kind of army is with the same tactics they use. Infiltrate their cels through bribery, blackmail, threats, anything necessary to find out their tactics, and then send in kill teams.

To set our soldiers out a targets for these thugs is the height of ignorance. There are no battle lines, no one to surrender to us, no army opposes us in the field, there is no way for us to know when we have won. People like you perpetuate the useless deaths of our soldiers, and ask for more deaths so you feel safe. How much blood on your hands before you feel safe? 4000 isn't enough?

Obama is willing to debate but is he willing to fight. I think he's a wimpy lib appeaser. He was even afraid of a girl reporter.

Yav

Unfortunately, reason is not in the conservative arsenal. They have latched onto a word they can repeat again and again to drive them into their thoughtless state. "Appeasers Appeasers". They don't know what it means or why dems are "Appeasers", but it sounds good and Bush said it. There can be no reasoning or logic from them when they get a word like that. Remember "Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop"?

FWThom-
I guess you would know, since you are still on your back for 'W' as he fucks the US.

BOB THE BUFFALO BUTT,

Obama's own words declare him an appeaser. He wants to surrender and run from Iraq and get on his knees and beg to talk with our terrorist enemies.

FWThom-
How is it over there in Iraq?

Hey BEATLEJUICE<

Vietnam was my war, but if Bush needed me for this one I would be glad to go. What about you? Still dodging your duty?

"al-Qaeda, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along? Can we stop making it, making it horrible?"

Posted by Zerobama at 2009-01-20 12:00 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)Funny Arrogant Stupid Appeasing




Yav

Told you so.

Yav

Told you so.


You were so right, too, Bob.

FWTHOM-

How's it feel to be irrelevant?

Don't worry, little psycho. We'll still play with you on DR.

Libs love ad hominum attacks but run out of intelectual arguments quickly. You should be proud to debate your positions: appeasement, isolationism, anti-free trade, pro-affirmative action, raising taxes, more government programs, anti-military, etc.

Careful, no one light any matches in here. The straw is DRY.

I See All You NEOCONs Fully Failed To Address Any Of The Diplomacy That Bush And His Administration Has Done.

Obama Is 100% Correct You Are All Wrong, Period !!

The Only Thing Bush Has Done Correctly You All Turn A Blind Eye To, Omar Was Dis-Armed With Diplomacy A Fact Bar None !!

-Sarge

fwthom

Libs love ad hominum attacks but run out of intelectual arguments quickly
Posted by fwthom at 2008-05-16 11:41 PM

BOB THE BUFFALO BUTT
Posted by fwthom at 2008-05-16 09:36 PM

Hey BEATLEJUICE
Posted by fwthom at 2008-05-16 10:15 PM


He wants to surrender and run from Iraq and get on his knees and beg to talk with our terrorist enemies.
Posted by fwthom at 2008-05-16 09:36 PM

Link?


What makes them appeasers?

Posted by YAV at 2008-05-16 08:17 PM

Response?

;-)

Response?

Yes. Why do you expect people to respond to your request for a link when you ignore those who ask the same of you?

Obama's own words declare him an appeaser. He wants to surrender and run from Iraq and get on his knees and beg to talk with our terrorist enemies.

Posted by fwthom at 2008-05-16 09:36 PM

All You Knott-Head NEOCONS You Are Just Like Your Leaders Don't Know What The Fuck You Are Talking About Period !!

This Guy Is The Epitome Of You All

Chris Matthews Eviscerates Right-Wing Host Kevin James Over Obama "Appeasement" Claims

www.huffingtonpost.com

-Sarge

NOW THAT'S APPEASEMENT!


US Lifts Most Sanctions Against Libya

21 - Sep - 2004

President Bush Monday lifted sanctions barring most U.S. trade with Libya. The move clears the way for compensation payments to families of victims of the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, for which Libya has taken responsibility.



The White House action lifts several more layers of U.S. economic sanctions against Libya and follows a set of what administration officials said were productive senior-level talks between the two governments late last week in London.



In a message to Congress, President Bush said he was revoking executive orders dating back to the mid-1980's that, among other things, barred scheduled and charter air service to Libya, banned U.S. imports of Libyan refined petroleum products, and impounded some $1.3 billion in Libyan assets.


www.warmafrica.com

-Sarge

Kevin James, belligerent, ignorant, typical republican.

What is different in 2008 from '04 is that when the republican smear machines launches at Obama he wont hide like John Kerry did. He'll step forward and give a history asswhoopin'. Just as the McBush has received in the last news cycle. BRING IT ON.

Lotsa fundies googling Nevelle Chambelain tonight.

I love it.

B-Bob says just bomb the shit out of everyone with no talks, and he labels that Bush. Of course, every member of congress that was democrat except, what, 1? Agreed with Bush at the time.

B-Bob, is your definition of bomb with no talks 17 UN resolutions before you bomb?

17 UN resolutions is your definition of no talking and just bomb?

In your world, how many UN resolutions and multi-party talks do you fucking need?

there was 17.

Maybe when they set that base up on the moon, the government of the moon, let by B-bob will make a rule, 100 resolutions before...not war..before...before...your...
well grounded and have to go to your room.

LOL

Kuma

Maybe when they set that base up on the moon, the government of the moon, let by B-bob will make a rule, 100 resolutions before...not war..before...before...your...
well grounded and have to go to your room.


Is it past your bedtime, or have you taken to many oxylimbaughs?

Obama keep Kicking those lying pieces of shit.

Put Dubya and McBush together and they know less about how to keep America safe than my 19yr old daughter.

Think about it with Obama.....when you are one of 'the boys', it is easy to think you can sit down with the brothers and talk it out...'be aware' folks...!!! Dubya or 'the Ditz' is like always, a 'non factor' in the world of intelligence... don't think for one moment that Obama, if he gets the Oval will start pulling out of Iraq in mass...this naive idiot has a lot of lessons to learn.. you could very well be set to see what four years of real 'on the job' training is like to a rookie.. and, it ain't going to be pretty if this nutcase makes the final steps..

17 UN resolutions is your definition of no talking and just bomb?

17 Resolutions ?

Do You Know What They Were For ?

Do You Think They Were Worth Bombing And Killing Innocent People With The Collateral Damage ?

By They Way You Do Know Saddam Allowed The UN Inspectors In His Country And Bush Advised Them To Leave Do you Not ?

Please Look Up What They Were Because You Sound Like Kevin James.

-Sarge

17 resolutions? Go look how manyu resolutions are against Israel. Just between 1993-1195 there were 18. I don't remember our war agains Israel.

"..this naive idiot has a lot of lessons to learn.. you could very well be set to see what four years of real 'on the job' training is like to a rookie.. and, it ain't going to be pretty if this nutcase makes the final steps.."

A Harvard Law Review editor and constitional law prof, and veteran of south Chicago politics is naive?

You gotta do better than that or yer gonna get yer right wingnut asses whupped!

You might want to ask the Clintons how easy he is.

TeeHee, bring it on!

Did you know that Neville Chamberlain was ENGLISH!!!

He wasn't from the US and his 'Appeasement' was a true appeasement in that he GAVE SOMETHING OR CONCEDED SOMETHING TO SOMEONE. In this case, with his signing of the Munich Agreement in 1938, he conceded part of Czechoslovakia to Hitler.

OH. ONE MORE THING! NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN WAS A CONSERVATIVE!!

Posted by COMMONSENSE

You mean the leader of the British Empire wasn't from the US? I guess that is a big news flash.

"he conceded part of Czechoslovakia to Hitler." It wasn't his to give.

Neville Chamberlain just about got England taken over by Hitler. Thank God the English people elected someone else in the next election.

I don't know how a conservative would give away something he didn't own. That seems to me to be a trait of the libs.

I don't know how a conservative would give away something he didn't own. That seems to me to be a trait of the libs.

Well No It Was A NEOCON Brit !!

The UK Had A Defense Pact And They Let Let Hitler Take The Country With Out A Fight !!

Nothing New For A NEOCON, Did Not Ronny Cut And Run ?

-Sarge

Hey Sarge, you know what?

I don;t care if Bush is the fucking Devil, and he invaded Iraq just for fun.

I don't care at all. Because your too stupid to realize that no matter what reason he did it, you will find a way to condemn him to hell.

But the thing about you Sarge is that your a dumbfuck hypocrite, because your ENTIRE Democrat party BACKED BUSH FOR THE INVASION>

Bush could not invade without democrats total approval.

And no matter what, you can't change that part of the history.

So fuck you, and fuck your mom 100x too.

ALL PARTIES are guilty equally, and they are all scumbags.

If you don't agree with me on that, no problem, fuck you again.

Kuma

Kuma-
Guilty of what? I was under the impression you thought it a good idea.

I didnt think it was a good idea, did you? Don't lie man.

Democrats all voted for it except 1, apparently your party thought it was A GREAT IDEA.

I mean John Kerry and Hillary were giving speeces about how they SUPPORTED GEORGE BUSH 100%.

LOL you got youtube I don't need to link it, you saw it all in 04.

How the hell was it a good idea? 1 trillion dollars, weakened our world position, no oil whatsoever out of the deal.

Yea, great idea. Bush is a moron, and so is every democrat who backed Bush./

Think about that guys.

DEMOCRATS WERE HAPPY TO BACK BUSH.

How come you mother fuckers keep voting in these democrats who all backed bush?

You like them? Are you serious? Vote in new Democrats that think like you, not lying assholes who all gave speeces to back Bush and support him.

What gives?

Kuma

Kuma-
You didn't think it was a good idea? I guess I'm not surprised, as it is hard to either find someone who voted for GWB or thought the Iraq war was a good idea these days.
So, you didn't think it was a good idea then, prescient as you were...what do you think of it now?

Dude, listen to me. I didn't think it was a good idea then, and I don't give a flying fuck about it now, because I can't do anything about whats already done.

I was in the Marines, I served in Desert Storm. After that experience, I learned a GREAT deal about the middle East and the US Government.

When you amass hundreds of thousands of troops, and bomb a country back to the stone ages like we did in 1991, then you DONT take it over when ALL the people of the country supported it back then...

Then your Government is a lost cause, and a worthless entity.

Don't you get that? Dude, the Republican Guard was surrendering in DROVES and THANKING US for SAVING THEM from Saddam in 1991.

Look how we fucked that up, all because of the UN.

Fuck the UN, Fuck democrats especially, and fuck all the Bushes for being ignorant idiots.

Am I clear?

Kuma

"Kevin James." new synonym for dittohead.
I believe there are quite a few Keven Jameses who post here every day.

Kevin Jameses

I guess the truth hurts, right dems?

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable