Duh.

Uh huh, can so!
- Corky

Ah, the authoritative MSM has spoken again and the Obamites howl at the moon. Did Grand Pooba Timmah say it was over again, too?

Odd how Obamites want insider SDs to vote now as the deciding factor ahead of real voters in the remaining states.

Lessee, after KY what will it be? Losses in 7 of the last ten races? How embarrassing for the presumptive nominee!

If a year ago anyone had said the the Dems would nominate the candidate that lost PA, Ohio, and FL, not to mention NY, CA, and NH, they would have been laughed out of the room.

They still may be in the fall.

Odd how Obamites want insider SDs to vote now as the deciding factor ahead of real voters in the remaining states.

Lessee, after KY what will it be? Losses in 7 of the last ten races? How embarrassing for the presumptive nominee!

I haven't heard anyone say the remaining races shouldn't be held. The rules committee meets on May 31st. If they keep their decisions quiet for a couple of days, the contests will be over at the beginning of June.

Corky, wasn't Hillary opposed to seating MI and FL before she was in favor of it?

Sounds like her choices are getting on board or spending the rest of her career fucking over the Democratic Party.

Corky, wasn't Hillary opposed to seating MI and FL before she was in favor of it?

Sounds like her choices are getting on board or spending the rest of her career fucking over the Democratic Party.

Lies! All Lies!!

--Corky

Ozark, that was hilarious. With an opening act like Corky, it's no wonder Hil is so popular down south.

"Corky, wasn't Hillary opposed to seating MI and FL before she was in favor of it?"

Ohmygawd, what an idiot. Typical Obamaniac. No, you dunce, Hillary was for seating MI and FL after she opposed it. Get a clue, silly. Sheesh!
~Corky "But You Can Just Call Me Corky" McBegnstrip

PS: Stop obsessing about my ass.

"Did Grand Pooba Timmah say it was over again, too?"

Isn't this Corky fella the one who always whines when people don't debate the points presented in HIS linked articles?

SA

Perhaps you thinking of Seaton Begg?

You could be right Doc. ;)

You're all fucking idiots if you can't comprehend that Clinton will be the next president despite what anyone thinks. Idiots I tells ya!

Sincerely,
El Corko

p.s.

I'm a teapot.

Keep it up ladies...and then we will get to see you point fingers at each other when the Dems hand an "unloseable" election to the GOP.

Hillary surrounded herself with loyalists and yes-people.

The professionals went to Obama.

It's as simple as that.

Mark Penn got trounced every step he took.

She's an idiot. Typical Democrat. She found a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

"She found a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."

Don't say snatch, Lee. Corky will get hysterical and accuse you of inherent sexism and blatant misogyny.

The purpose of seating MIFL delegates was not that the Clinton camp couldn't add up delegates and know they would still be short, but it was to legitimize the popular vote count.

Adding those states means that more people have voted in primaries for HRC than for Obama.

Of course, I expect that Obama's fans, if not Obama himself, will take the smallest victory in Dem primary history and, in a very George Bush fashion, think that they have some kind of a man-date.

(Doc and SA having each other as man-dates need not be counted)

Sorry Corky, my partner doesn't allow me to date.

"Of course, I expect that Obama's fans, if not Obama himself, will take the smallest victory in Dem primary history"

Who's got the delegates, Corky? Not Hillary. That's all that matter no matter what you think.

"The purpose of seating MIFL delegates was not that the Clinton camp couldn't add up delegates and know they would still be short, but it was to legitimize the popular vote count."

That whole "popular vote" bullshit is just a ruse so you pansies can continue to push Hildebeest. And if it wasn't about delegates, why did Hillary reject the recently proposed compromise that would have no affect on the "popular vote" count? It IS about the delegates and her desperate, self-serving attempt to get everyone of them even though she is long past done.

If you give Obama even a conservative number of pledged delegates from the remaining primaries, he will only need about 60-65 of the outstanding SD's for the nomination.

It is bleak in Corky World indeed.

Adding those states means that more people have voted in primaries for HRC than for Obama.

Are you counting caucus states?

'S OK, SA, Doc cheats.

If Obama ever actually manages to back into this nomination, Doc will be the one proclaiming the Second Cumming.

If you give Obama even a conservative number of pledged delegates from the remaining primaries, he will only need about 60-65 of the outstanding SD's for the nomination.

That assumes that there is not a Wright still hidden that would make the SD's flee an unelectable candidate. Not that I expect that to happen - the Dem's have their heads so far up their asses this cycle that it is amazing anyone can even count the votes....

-That assumes that there is not a Wright still hidden

Of course, if Rev Wrong had appeared before Iowa, the election would have been over by Super Tuesday.

If Obama has any more surprises in his closet that he knows could cost the entire election, he isn't telling. But then, he knew about the Rev, too.

If Obama ever actually manages to back into this nomination, Doc will be the one proclaiming the Second Cumming.

Posted by Corky at 2008-05-16 03:37 PM | Reply

"Back into" the nomination?

Corky, seriously, you need therapy.

"Of course, if Rev Wrong had appeared before Iowa, the election would have been over by Super Tuesday."

And if frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their butts when they hop!

But then, he knew about the Rev, too.

Posted by Corky

when did Hillary, the pathological liar, know there was no sniper fire in Bosnia? The only way I would consider voting for McShame now is if Obama picked Hillary for the #2 spot.

Winning the nomination outright would have been beating her in PA or Ohio or even Indiana.

Right now he is barely winning the closest Dem primary in history. If he didn't want to "back into" the nomination, he should have closed the deal long ago instead of losing most of the last 8 races and splitting next Tuesday.

btw, how's that lobotomy thing working out for you?

SA - If frogs had Rev Wrong, they would have croaked long ago, too.

Just who is "the pathological liar"


Barack Obama in 2003, talking to the AFL/CIO:

"I happen to be a proponent of single-payer universal healthcare coverage. That's what I'd like to see."

In January, 2008, Obama claimed in a nationally televised debate:

"I never said that we should try to go ahead and get single-payer."
______________________________
___________________
In his memoir, Obama writes of one of the watershed moments of his racial awareness -- time and again in remarkable detail. It is a story about a Life magazine article that influenced him. The report was about a black man who tried to bleach his skin white. When Obama was told no such article could be found in Life, he says "it might have been Ebony.
The article included photos of a black man who had destroyed his skin with powerful chemical lighteners that promised to make him white. Instead, the chemicals had peeled off much of his skin, leaving him sad and scarred, Obama recalled.

"I imagine other black children, then and now, undergoing similar moments of revelation," Obama wrote of the magazine photos in "Dreams."

Yet no such photo exists, according to historians at the magazine. No such photos, no such article. When asked about the discrepancy, Obama said in a recent interview, "It might have been an Ebony or it might have been ... who knows what it was?" (At the request of the Tribune, archivists at Ebony searched their catalogue of past articles, none of which matched what Obama recalled.)
______________________________
______________________

On July 28th, the day after his speech at the Democratic convention catapulted him into the national spotlight, Barack Obama told a group of reporters in Boston that the United States had an "absolute obligation" to remain in Iraq long enough to make it a success.

"The failure of the Iraqi state would be a disaster," he said at a lunch sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, according to an audiotape of the session. "It would dishonor the 900-plus men and women who have already died. . . . It would be a betrayal of the promise that we made to the Iraqi people, and it would be hugely destabilizing from a national security perspective."


In late winter, 2008, on the campaign trail, Obama says he wants to bring the troops home yesterday -- you decide -- was he lying then or is he lying now?
______________________________
______________________

On the January 22nd edition of "Meet the Press," Tim Russert and Obama had the following exchange:

Russert: "When we talked back in November of '04 after your election, I said, 'There's been enormous speculation about your political future. Will you serve your six-year term as United States senator from Illinois?'"

Obama: "I will serve out my full six-year term. You know, Tim, if you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things. But my thinking has not changed."

Russert: "So you will not run for president or vice president in 2008?"

Obama: "I will not."
______________________________
__________________----


Please dont make me go on. I will match any of your Obama fans lie for lie throw a clinton lie at me and I will match an Obama lie

The purpose of seating MIFL delegates ...

is so they don't have to stand around waiting to get fucked. (I'd link to a MIFL site but rCade gets pissy about pussy ads)

"Winning the nomination outright would have been beating her in PA or Ohio or even Indiana."

I am pretty sure that the definition of winning the nomination outright is having the requisite number of delegates at the convention. Nothing more, nothing less.

I am pretty sure that the definition of winning the nomination outright is having the requisite number of delegates at the convention. Nothing more, nothing less.

-----------------------------

finally an argument I agree with evenm though I am a Clinton supporter I agree how this will end.

"Please dont make me go on. I will match any of your Obama fans lie for lie throw a clinton lie at me and I will match an Obama lie

Posted by stuart46"

Sarcastic slow clap for Stewie.

Right now he is barely winning the closest Dem primary in history.

Posted by Corky at 2008-05-16 04:22 PM | Reply

If by "barely winning" you mean that he is maintaining an insurmountable lead among pledged delegates and an ever-growing lead among superdelegates with a likelihood of maintaining a popular vote lead, then I agree with you.

but in the General Election it is Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.


That's odd, according to your link Obama is ahead of Hillary in the national election.

"Please dont make me go on. I will match any of your Obama fans lie for lie throw a clinton lie at me and I will match an Obama lie

Posted by stuart46"

Sarcastic slow clap for Stewie.

Posted by SanAntonioRogue

If people honestly can't see the similarity of Bush's 29% and the Obama fanatics, they are retarded. These people are mirror images thinking their lying Messiah does no wrong....funny, funny and childlike...

"That's odd, according to your link Obama is ahead of Hillary in the national election.

Posted by ness_gadol"

Right you are Ness.

These people are mirror images thinking their lying Messiah does no wrong....funny, funny and childlike...



Well since I am going to be stuck voting Obama in the fall or leaving the Democratic party I find it scary, scary, scary.

far be it for me to throw stones I know all of Clintons baggage but I am sick of hearing how big of a lier Clinton is. Doesnt anyone research their own canidate

She's an idiot. Typical Democrat. She found a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Posted by LeeAtwater

well hillary will prbably lose the nomination but obama will lose the election..you guys are a fucking hoot to watch implode.

"That's odd, according to your link Obama is ahead of Hillary in the national election.

Posted by ness_gadol"

Right you are Ness.

Posted by SanAntonioRogue

Um, if you retards understood the general, you would realize it is winner take all (unlike the dem primary) and McCain wins the swing states vs. Obama while he loses vs. Clinton. If Obama loses Ohio and Florida (which he will) - say hello to President McCain. Frankly, I don't put too much stock in these numbers as this is pre-Rove and 527 which will make Obama drop like a rock. I see him carrying Illinios and Hawaii only...

I see him carrying Illinios and Hawaii only...

Care to back that up, because if you are, I am definitely in.

Are you counting caucus states?

Posted by taxman

that and the super delegates were the problem to begin with.. You honestly don't believe caucus states are a genuine reflection of the voter populace? This is just another symptom of the stupidity the dems exhibit.

A winner take all that matches the electoral college would have already seated hillary..

I am pretty sure that the definition of winning the nomination outright is having the requisite number of delegates at the convention. Nothing more, nothing less. -- SA

The fact that a candidate might win the Dem nomination by racking up red-state delegates and without appealing to swing states and swing voters doesn't bode well for November election success. Let's hope it motivates the Dem Party to reform the primary system.

"You honestly don't believe caucus states are a genuine reflection of the voter populace?"

Do you have any evidence that they are NOT?

After all, the original Greek concept and purest form of Democracy was that all eligible citizens attended town hall type meetings and had equal say in the process.

I can't stand Hitlary but if the Dems want to nominate 0 (as in zero) then Mr. RHINO himself McCain (assuming he's the Repub nominee and that ain't certain either) will win in November.

Not that I want McCain to be Prez but it'd beat having a spineless Dem bending over for the terrorists, the political correct and every other faction intent on destroying the U.S.A.

Winning the nomination, but losing in November---not so good.

----

Six months ago, who was leading the Dem primary according to the polls?

Six months ago, who was leading the Dem primary according to the polls?

Posted by Pirate at 2008-05-16 05:10 PM | Reply


There were no polls six months ago. Only news projections. No one had voted yet--no one had heard the candidates yet. To say today is the same as six months ago is simply stupid, and ignoring reality. Typical republican traits.

Not that I want McCain to be Prez but it'd beat having a spineless Dem bending over for the terrorists, the political correct and every other faction intent on destroying the U.S.A.

Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch at 2008-05-16 05:08 PM


Quit whining like a little bitch you pants pisser. Live in fear your whole life--but try to do it without blubbering your fears over the internet. How so many cowards got to be Americans is a mystery. Were you home schooled?

Boo Hoo Hoo (blubber, snort), those nasty terrorists are gonna blow me up--please send your sons and daughtrers to die to protect me.

GimmeaScotchandSomeBalls

There were no polls six months ago... Typical republican traits.

Lying: Typical bOoB traits

GimmeaScotchandSomeBalls

FF for BB!

Today CNN said that as of now in a match up against McCain the polls showed the following percentages:

McCain 45% and Obama 45%

McCain 45% and Hillary 48%

How do you explain that?

Pirate

Those are news projections. Not polls. No people were polled. The news made it up. They polled their office if they polled anything.

Let's see their polling methods. Who did they poll? How did they do their poll? How many people were polled?

To say today is the same as six months ago is simply stupid, and ignoring reality.

----

Her campaign is seriously in debt. She started as the favorite and now is the loser.

The past is a good indication of the future.

"Quit whining like a little bitch you pants pisser. Live in fear your whole life--but try to do it without blubbering your fears over the internet.
Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-05-16 05:20 PM"



Typical asinine non-retort from BaffledBob another useless liberal from the same weak gene pool as LarryMoron and Spudmeister the dud of the North.

I can't stand Hitlary but if the Dems want to nominate 0 (as in zero) then Mr. RHINO himself McCain (assuming he's the Repub nominee and that ain't certain either) will win in November.

Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch at 2008-05-16 05:08 PM

What's a RHINO?

GimmeaScotch --

GimmeaScotchandSomeBalls

FF for BB!

Posted by CalifChris at 2008-05-16

Don't take my FF personally against you.
I just laugh whenever something strikes me as funny -- doesn't matter who says it or why.

"GimmeaScotchandSomeBalls"


Gee CalifChris coming from you that almost hurt - I'm serious I kinda like you - but not that way.

Democrat Polls
IVR Polls
Mid-date: 11/8/2007
Texas
w/o Al Gore
Added: 11/15/07
Est. MoE = 4.3% [?]

Hillary Clinton 51%
Barack Obama 17%
John Edwards 11%
Bill Richardson 10%
Dennis Kucinich 2%
Joe Biden 1%
Unsure 8%
Source

bOoB: Please explain why they called this a poll and not a "news projection"

Interviews with 1,002 adult Americans conducted by telephone
by Opinion Research Corporation on December 6-9, 2007. The
margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample
is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

i.a.cnn.net

Posted by Pirate at 2008-05-16 05:36 PM |


And you believe them. Case closed.

I guess it was a conspiracy Bob?

Yes, the great poll conspiracy of November 2007. See it on a youtube.com video near you.

Give it up, Bob. The more you try to work it, the more ridiculous you become.

The more you try to work it, the more ridiculous you become

Impossible. That's like trying to go north of the north pole or getting colder than absolute zero.

Da bOoB has reached "absolute ridiculousness", a state of being that when acquired makes it impossible for one to become any more absurd.

Like trying to further cool matter in a Bose-Einstein state, it is impossible to make oneself appear more absurd than absolute ridiculousness as da bOoB has managed to do.

GIMME

GimmeaScotchandSomeBalls"

Gee CalifChris coming from you that almost hurt - I'm serious I kinda like you - but not that way.

Posted by Gimme_a_Scotch at 2008-05-16 05:37 PM

Did you miss my 5:35 p.m. post to you?

"Did you miss my 5:35 p.m. post to you?"

Damn dial-up is really slow today Chris took about 4 minutes for my response to go through after I hit post.

Current polls show Clinton winning Ohio, WVa, Florida, and the election from McCain.

----

You do realize that the WV poll was done on Feb 28 which is 2 1/2 months ago?

She can carry Burkina Faso, Krygistan, and the suburbs of Guatemala City for all I care. She's still not going to get the Democratic nomination.

She shouldn't even count on Michian nor Florida because She already said they would not count. She should switch Her party afiliation to the Republican Party where She started out with. She has no scruples.

Larry Mohr

You do realize that the WV poll was done on Feb 28 which is 2 1/2 months ago?

Posted by Pirate at 2008-05-16 06:13 PM | Reply


So? It is the current poll. WVa went for Bush 56%-43% over Kerry, which shows strong conservative voting. It shows going 47%-42% clinton over McCain which shows strong disatisfaction with republicans. It shows Obama losing to McCain 53%-35%.

It shows Clinton with a 5 point lead.

It shows Obama with an 18 point deficit.

It shows Obama has a long way to go to win WVa.

It shows Clinton would have a much easier time carrying WVa.

Larry Mohr

Maybe--but current polls show her winning in November against McCain and Obama losing in November against McCain.

Which would you rather have? Clinton or McCain?

So? It is the current poll.

2.5 months ago is not current.

She can carry Burkina Faso, Krygistan, and the suburbs of Guatemala City for all I care. She's still not going to get the Democratic nomination.

Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2008-05-16 06:19 PM | Reply


True. But Obama isn't doing so hot in November. Current polls show him losing to McCain. The states he won that gave him the nomination are red states. States he won't carry in November. That big win in South Carolina? Meaningless in November. That 11 state win streak? All red states--meaningless in November. I hope you can turn your hatred of Clinton into a love of McCain, because it looks like Obama wins the nomination, but becomes meaningless in November.

But maybe you are one of those who would welcome McCain before Clinton.

So? It is the current poll.

2.5 months ago is not current.

Posted by goatman at 2008-05-16 06:30 PM |


Yes, it is. It is the most current poll there is.

what a dUmmY

;-)

Current polls show him losing to McCain. The states he won that gave him the nomination are red states. States he won't carry in November. That big win in South Carolina?

Polls 6 months before an election? Meaningless. Polls last November showed Clinton with a commanding -- most said untouchable -- lead over Obama

"Polls 6 months before an election? Meaningless. Polls last November showed Clinton with a commanding -- most said untouchable -- lead over Obama"

Posted by goatman at 2008-05-16 06:36 PM | Reply

If you think they are meaningless--fine. But your post says nothing to refute the FACTS dUmmy.

FACTS are:

Current polls show him losing to McCain. The states he won that gave him the nomination are red states. States he won't carry in November.

Is it a masochistic tendency that makes you set yourself up for the easy knock out punch, or is it sheer stupidity, bOoB?

It's not over until the fat lady sings, and Obama has so many skeletons in his closet in addition to being such a screw-up when required to be extemperaneous, that Ms Hillary would be well-advised to just hang in there.

After all, Obama is trudging along under the weight of:

1. Black racist associations including his Rev. Wright and Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam, and the current pastors of Trinity..

2. Terrorist associations including William Ayers, and his wife Bernadette.

3. Received some $300,000 in bribes from Rezko and an Arab financier for purchase of his home property in return for "favors."

4. Rezko's conviction before the convention might result in Rezko "ratting out" Obama on other deals for leniency.

5. Activity as an Alinksy street agitator inciting racial antagonism.

6. Hate America associations.

7. Demeaning attitude towards women.

8. Wife's anti-white history and lack of love of country.

9. Islamic family connections displayed in Africa.

10. Philanderer.

11. Druggie - user and dealer.

Well, that's just some of the history affecting Obama's viability. What secret will out that will explode with sufficient power to destroy his viability as a candidate, if and when, is always in the wings.

There's a time-bomb ticking there because he has been a bad boy throughout his life and has maintained and still maintains, unhealthy associations.

How much is excused for this unfit candidate?

My link upthread did indeed provide a fact that proved that polls 6 months ahead of an election are meaningless.

www.usaelectionpolls.com

Who's the dummy?

Posted by goatman at 2008-05-16 06:45 PM

You are dUmmy. You just aren't bright enough to realize it.

Facts are:

Current polls show Obama losing to McCain. The states he won that gave him the nomination are red states. States he won't carry in November.

The fat lady is warming up Hillary.....

"The fat lady is warming up Hillary."
Posted by Unclesam

Is it on youporn?

6. Hate America associations.

Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea for the next president to hate the state of Bush's nation.

Torture, wars of aggression are fundamental criminal actions. There are no exceptions made, a human is a human and cannot lawfully be tortured. No single country can ignore or anull these rules for whatever reason - that is clearly written in International Law.

(obviously the international policemen don't respond as quickly as the national ones).

Torture by proxy is specifically covered. You can't get someone else to do the torturing for you, just like you can't hire a hitman to murder for you.

"There's a time-bomb ticking there because he has been a bad boy throughout his life and has maintained and still maintains, unhealthy associations.

...
Posted by Johnson "


What a psycho, not to mention a liar and smear artist.

"Posted by Johnson "


What a psycho, not to mention a liar and smear artist."

Posted by nullifidian


But not always.

You are dUmmy. You just aren't bright enough to realize it.

What does this have to do with I proved you wrong about your statement that there were no polls 6 months ago. What does this have to do with the fact I rubbed your face in your error about polls being meaningless this far in advance.

Not only are you a liar, you can't even deflect worth a shit!

Loser