It's mostly neocons and moonbats, very few libertarians.

Begin the count?

1 conservative-libertarian.

conservative.

Nihilist

We are Nihilists, Lebowski. We believe in nothing.

Neither. I'm heterosexual.

Well, I am a liberal and proud of it.

muslim and hated ;)

BULLSHIITE, KLIFFERD!

who hates you? let me at them!

*;]

Actually, I've thought the same thing for a long time now. With the exception of a few prolific leftwing posters such as Dethspud and Danni, right leaning posters on this site seem to far outnumber everyone else. Not only are they in the majority, but on an individual basis they tend to be far more prolific in their quantity of posts.

The following come to mind simply as I sit here at the keyboard.
Armyof1,BL2,CalifChris,Chairbo
rne,Cookfish,Goatman, JestGetting, Joe, Kerrin, MikeWarrior,Mooman, Nanc, Pinche, Pirate, Rideon, RobAH, Salamandagator, Sniper, Walt,WisGod,

Liberal.

MODER8

You're full of crap as usual.

Rethink your post Moder8 after sobbering up.

Mod: There are a lot more libs than Dani and deth. Regardless we libs outshine the cons based on quality regardless of quantity.

Liberal

Nationalist

-Sarge

Posse Comitatus

Whig.

I am registered as an "independent" on the voting roles.
On many issues I definitely lean to the right.

Yet I cannot stand Bush and 99% of his globalist policies.
I hate Bush's illegal war in Iraq.
I love our military guys.
I innocently voted for Bush in 2000.
I voted Democrat in 2004 because I woke up.
I'm about 75% conservative in my views on most subjects.

Where does that leave me?

Does ya even hafta ask?

Say it LOUD!

Liberal and Proud!

Be Well.

Librul

Fiscally conservative...very
Socially liberal...very

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Reagan58 47. Johnson 48.Crackpipejunkie 49. MSGT 50. Jacque Strap

There are more, but Let's see those who say this site has more libs than cons put up or shut up.

Like this guy:

"bob, bob, bob.......... an overwhelming majority of folks on this site are libs. And they start the name calling...."

Posted by retnluvnit at 2008-04-03 07:10 PM | Reply | Flag

and he's wrong on the name calling also.

and this guy:

I would say the cons outnumber the libs 3-2.

"Not in this forum. This stat is coming from someone who sees smokestacks on the moon, though."

Posted by goatman at 2008-04-03 11:36 PM | Reply

and he's wrong about the Smokestacks on the moon also.

;-)

OH---and 51. retnluvnit

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Reagan58 47. Johnson 48.Crackpipejunkie 49. MSGT 50. Jacque Strap 51. retnluvnit 52. Califchris

Liberal

FF for Sanantoniorogue.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Reagan58 47. Johnson 48.Crackpipejunkie 49. MSGT 50. Jacque Strap 51. retnluvnit 52. Califchris 53. Armyof1 54. MikeWarrior 55. Moomanfl

What's with the list? I vote libertarian.

56. Ray 57. Jsprague

"What's with the list? I vote libertarian."

Libertarians are rightwingers who smoke pot.

Count pitchers and catchers next.

Where's the lefty list? Or do we need to draft it on a roll of TP before publishing?

Wisgod


Can you count? Start your list and others can cut and paste and add to it.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Reagan58 47. Johnson 48.Crackpipejunkie 49. MSGT 50. Jacque Strap 51. retnluvnit 52. Califchris 53. Armyof1 54. MikeWarrior 55. Moomanfl 56. Ray 57. Jsprague

I consider myself a moderate but would assume that people here think I am a liberal.

Can you count?
Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Smart talk from a guy who has Reagan58 listed as #47....

The guy who runs the site is liberal. This the Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs.

This is a liberal website.

Buffalo Idiot - take me off the list. I am socially liberal.

Pirate

The owner of the site doesn't make it a liberal site. If more posters are conservative, this is a conservative site. I suppose if Rcade owned the site and only conservatives posted on it, you would still say it was a liberal site. That is your republican logic.

"Buffalo Idiot - take me off the list. I am socially liberal."

And someone who spends 90% of their time bashing "libs". Keep him on the list, Bob.

Buffalo Idiot - take me off the list. I am socially liberal.

Posted by JOE at 2008-04-09 02:49 PM | Reply


No Joe, you are not socially liberal. You are just too stupid to know you are a conservative. Anyone can go to your posts and see that you have nothing in common with liberal thinking.


"Once again - liberals were too stupid to vote for him, too. Not Kucinich's or Nader's fault. And it doesn't make either of them jerks for giving Americans the option to vote for someone who will live up to their promises."

Posted by JOE at 2008-04-09 01:40 PM | Reply

Need more? There's plenty.

Socially Liberal (to a point)
Financially Conservative.

Nationalistic to the bone.

Pro Guns
Pro Death Penalty
Pro 100% border and port security

Wish the candidates were talking about issues that concern me:
illegal immigration needs to stop
we need to fix our SS and Medicare problems
Tarrifs on all imports to even out our trade deficit

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Reagan58 47. Johnson 48.Crackpipejunkie 49. MSGT 50. Jacque Strap 51. retnluvnit 52. Califchris 53. Armyof1 54. MikeWarrior 55. Moomanfl 56. Ray 57. Jsprague 58.2112

58. Member####

Eric Alterman
John Callender
Rafe Colburn
Juan Cole
Joe Conason
David Corn
John Dean
Brad DeLong
Gary Denton
E.J. Dionne
Bob Dreyfuss
Michael Finley
Brad Friedman
Dan Froomkin
Joe Gandelman
Richard Gwyn
Larry Handlin
Bob Herbert
Jim Hightower
Derrick Jackson
Dan Kennedy
Paul Krugman
Karen Kwiatkowski
J.D. Lasica
Joe Lavin
Sheila Lennon
Peter Levine
Dave Linabury
Susie Madrak
Rachel Maddow
Harold Meyerson
Michael Moore
Mark Morford
David Neiwert
John Nichols
Greg Palast
Ted Rall
Dennis Roddy
Michael Rogers
Neil Rogers
James Romenesko
Peter Rothberg
Lynn Samuels
Sam Seder
Mark Schmitt
Ed Schultz
Michael Shaw
David Sirota
Pam Spaulding
Helen Thomas
K. Vanden Heuvel
Matthew Yglesias

bluffalo? are you keeping track of all of us?

there appears to be many more liberals here than conservatives. i'd say we're outnumbered at a very high rate.

too bad there's not a search engine here for cursewords - that's a sure sign! not that conservatives never cuss, but your side is so much more efficient at it! *;]

p.s. and it appears that nearly all the links are to leftwing sites.

What difference does any of this make? You want to wear a label - fine, that's your choice. Sort of like those people who buy "logo wear" to demonstrate their loyalty to Pennzoil, or Ms Magazine, or some soon to be has-been pop culture idol.

Some call it "identity politics" but I just think it's another way to put people into a box and either discount them or provide them victim status - which is nearly redundant when you think of it.

There are those hapless few who have no identity, and cling to anything that says "I'm cool" or "weird" or at least attracts some attention.

Personally I sometimes wonder at the labels people wear because they don't seem to be consistent with what they say or do. I do think it's funny that libs try to label me con, and the cons try to label me lib.

I either respect your opinion or I don't. You have your facts straight or not. You get a pass or you're on my shit list - and some people never get off that list. Naturally The b00b is one of them.

Might as well add Corky (AKA Seaten Beggs) to your list Bob. Lord knows we'll be stuck with him after Hillary concedes.

"there appears to be many more liberals here than conservatives. i'd say we're outnumbered at a very high rate."

Try looking at this site when you're not high.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Reagan58 47. Johnson 48.Crackpipejunkie 49. MSGT 50. Jacque Strap 51. retnluvnit 52. Califchris 53. Armyof1 54. MikeWarrior 55. Moomanfl 56. Ray 57. Jsprague


I am taking myself off your stupid list. I am not a conservative.

am taking myself off your stupid list. I am not a conservative.

Posted by _2112_ at 2008-04-09 03:12 PM

Crank up some YYZ 2112. Who fucking cares what he classifies you as.

Can you count?
Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Smart talk from a guy who has Reagan58 listed as #47....

Posted by wisgod at 2008-04-09 02:47 PM | Reply | Flag


Yeah, you gotta think Bob's standards for liberal are pretty high if I'm on his list of cons.

Try looking at this site when you're not high.

Posted by nullifidian at 2008-04-09 03:06 PM

If you made that a requirement then you wouldn't have any libruls on this site.

Sincerely,

#58.

bluffalo? are you keeping track of all of us?

there appears to be many more liberals here than conservatives. i'd say we're outnumbered at a very high rate.

Posted by nanc at 2008-04-09 03:01 PM | Reply

Really? So far I see 57 names on the conservative list, and none on the liberal list. You should quit making things up, it is a bad example to set for children.

You should quit making things up, it is a bad example to set for children.

Like the astronauts faking their distance to Earth?

The b00b is a degenerate coward and compulsive liar.

If you really cared about the children you'd stop breathing.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague

Reagan 58, sorry for the mistake.

58. 2112 59. Member 60. RightoCenter

If more posters are conservative, this is a conservative site. I suppose if Rcade owned the site and only conservatives posted on it, you would still say it was a liberal site. That is your republican logic.

----

1) Still doesn't change the fact that rcade fully controls the front page and that he gives it a liberal viewpoint. He determines what stories get posted on the front page and thus what stories we get to post on.

2) You haven't even taken into consideration people who view only. You can argue that the majority of posters are conservative but you cannot argue that the majority of viewers are conservative because you cannot sample them.

Ozarkannie

I wasn't the one faking the disatance from the Earth. Want to run another thread on that one too? It is a very convincing video for anyone with a brain.

;-)

Really? So far I see 57 names on the conservative list, and none on the liberal list.


How about you, BBob! You didn't put yourself on the liberal list.

Here are more who I believe consider themselves liberal:

Danni
Spud
Nullifidian
Truthhurts
ManyPaths
Moder8
Herm
Hans
Yomama
Moneywar
Zatoichi
Redneckville
SilverIronist
Yav
Zot

Pirate, you don't understand. Bob isn't going to put a list of lefties together even though he started the thread. Same as arguing you've never lost a round of golf...because you've never played a round of golf.

where are you finding this LIST?

1) Still doesn't change the fact that rcade fully controls the front page and that he gives it a liberal viewpoint. He determines what stories get posted on the front page and thus what stories we get to post on.


SO? As a liberal Rcader gives equal posting to all sides of all issues.


2) You haven't even taken into consideration people who view only. You can argue that the majority of posters are conservative but you cannot argue that the majority of viewers are conservative because you cannot sample them.

The point was never about who is LOOKING at the site--it is about who is POSTING on the site.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"bob, bob, bob.......... an overwhelming majority of folks on this site are libs. And they start the name calling...."


Posted by retnluvnit at 2008-04-03 07:10 PM | Reply | Flag

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I would say the cons outnumber the libs 3-2.


"Not in this forum. This stat is coming from someone who sees smokestacks on the moon, though."


Posted by goatman at 2008-04-03 11:36 PM | Reply

Califchris

I'm not making up the liberal list. If you are--try putting numbers next to the names so we can keep count.

wisgod,

Never expected him to. That would be logical.

I'm not making up the liberal list.

----

Which exactly why you can state "This is not a liberal site". I know one is side that I'm counting is more than one side that I'm not counting And you complain about Republican logic?

* one side that I'm counting

I think thigs are pretty balanced around here.

Sure Rob has to post 18 hours each day to keep it balanced, but it's not like he has a life or anything.

So, I'll stick with pretty balanced.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague 57. 2112 58. Member 59. RightoCenter

I'm not making up the liberal list. If you are--try putting numbers next to the names so we can keep count.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Then why did you start this thread, Mr. Half Ass?

Pirate

Would you want a democrat being the only one counting the votes in an election?

Same concept here

Conservatives have said that there are more liberals on this site than conservatives.

I say bullshit.

I'm proving my point--now conservatives can either count the liberals or STFU. Simple isn't it? Even a republican should be able to understand.

"Still doesn't change the fact that rcade fully controls the front page and that he gives it a liberal viewpoint. He determines what stories get posted on the front page and thus what stories we get to post on."

You do know that you can post on the stories on the Back Page also, right?


That being said, it appears to me that while there are lots of con posters here, the majority of the stories seem to be put up by lib posters.

Then why did you start this thread, Mr. Half Ass?

Posted by wisgod at 2008-04-09 03:42 PM |

Good point, wisgod.

Pirate also made a good point to BuffaloBob:

Which exactly why you can state "This is not a liberal site". I know one is side that I'm counting is more than one side that I'm not counting And you complain about Republican logic?

Of course one side will be weighted more (toward conservatives) when the other side (toward liberals) doesn't even have a list of names and the number is always ZERO! duh.
BBob -- are you listening?

If you ask the people on the rig where I work, I am a bleeding heart liberal.

If you ask my friends at home and with whom I grew up and have known me the longest and the best, I am an exactly in the middle moderate.

If you ask the people on this blog am conservative.

So I'll go with majority who are also the people who know me best: Moderate

I'm proving my point--now conservatives can either count the liberals or STFU. Simple isn't it? Even a republican should be able to understand.

----

1) It's just a list of names.
2) Your list has already been wrong.
3) It's YOUR claim that conservatives outnumber liberals. YOU prove it.

"he other side (toward liberals) doesn't even have a list of names and the number is always ZERO! duh.
BBob -- are you listening?"


Nobody is being prevented from creating a list of the left. Do it yourself or stop whining.

"3) It's YOUR claim that conservatives outnumber liberals. YOU prove it."

He's already done that.

"3) It's YOUR claim that conservatives outnumber liberals. YOU prove it."

He's already done that.

----

What's the count then of conservatives vs liberal posters?

He's already done that.

Posted by nullifidian


The only thing that Bob's been proven is that Liberals are lazy, and alway's expect Conservatives to support them.

"Here are more who I believe consider themselves liberal:
...

Zatoichi ... "

Posted by CalifChris

What part of the fact that you have the IQ of lint makes me a liberal? It's been down hill since Ike. I miss Goldwater; And Curtis LeMay.

"What's the count then of conservatives vs liberal posters?"

Nothing preventing you from counting.

"The only thing that Bob's been proven is that Liberals are lazy, and alway's expect Conservatives to support them."

The lazy ones are the conservatives who whine about this but are too lazy to create their own list.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague 57. 2112 58. Member 59. RightoCenter 60. Zatoichi

Nullidiot -

Nobody is being prevented from creating a list of the left. Do it yourself or stop whining.

I already did earlier. Can't you read? I just jotted these names down off the top of my head. If you can count higher than 15 -- the number of names already down on the "liberal" list -- you can take over the counting job from this point on. I've got other things to do.

Danni
Spud
Nullifidian
Truthhurts
ManyPaths
Moder8
Herm
Hans
Yomama
Moneywar
Zatoichi
Redneckville
SilverIronist
Yav
Zot

Posted by CalifChris at 2008-04-09 03:33 PM

Nothing preventing you from counting.

----

I'm not the one making the claim. Bob is. Burden of proof is on him.

60. Zatoichi

Hah! Proves my point that this thread is totally inaccurate.
I had Zat down on the "liberal" list.

"I already did earlier. Can't you read?"

I saw your list. So what? That list proves that conservatives outnumber liberals, which is Bob's point.

The lazy ones are the conservatives who whine about this but are too lazy to create their own list.

----

Um, Bob started this thread. He's the one whining.

I took a count and there are 12389034 liberals who have posted to 324 conservatives.

"I'm not the one making the claim. Bob is. Burden of proof is on him."

He has met the burden of proof. No one else can come up with a list of the left that comes close.

The lazy ones are the conservatives who whine about this but are too lazy to create their own list.

Posted by nullifidian

Eh, the author of this thread is.....who?
I personally, don't care. One Liberal is too many. :)

I took a count and there are 12389034 liberals who have posted to 324 conservatives.

Posted by Pirate

I've checked Pirate's results and concur. Tag, Bob's it.

It's YOUR claim that conservatives outnumber liberals. YOU prove it."

He's already done that.

???

I love the way people on this site treat numbers and statistics.

You are assuming the ones that didn't answer are conservative. I am assuming that the ones who didn't answer are liberal.

Therefore, the liberals outnumber the conservatives.

Or perhaps the liberals don't want to answer because they know that it goes without saying this is a liberal site

Or maybe they don't want to answer because they want to skew the numbers and make it look like a conservative site.

IOW, This is hardly a scientific poll.

Besides, is it the number of posters or the number of posts that determine if the site is liberal or conservative? What if there was one liberal poster who posted 99 posts a day and 99 conservative posters who between them posted only one or two a day. I would say it was a liberal site in spite of the majority of conservatives.

Again, I love the way people twist numbers and statistics. I highly recommend a book called Innumeracy. Innumeracy is to math what illiteracy is to the written word. It is very enlighening and explains how stats are skewed and twisted. This "poll" is a perfect example. The author of this book would have a field day tearing it to shreds.

btw, good thread topic, bob

He has met the burden of proof. No one else can come up with a list of the left that comes close.

----

Wrong. It's 12389034 liberals to 324 conservatives.

"Eh, the author of this thread is.....who? "

And if someone can refute Bob's list they are free to come up with their own list. Until then, Bob's point stands.

I've checked Pirate's results and concur.

----

That's it then. Results confirmed. Case closed.

"I took a count and there are 12389034"


you forgot to carry the one

Liberals outweigh conservatives on this website. I've already proved it with my numbers, which have been confirmed.

"Wrong. It's 12389034 liberals to 324 conservatives."

In other words, you're too lazy to come up with your own list, or you know you can't refute Bob's point.

Can you count? Start your list and others can cut and paste and add to it.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-04-09 02:42 PM

Another error in the poll. bob is determining who is conservative. I look at his list and I see several that are liberal. This makes it an opinion poll, not a factual one. Nothing wrong with opinion polls, but you can't take those numbers and say, "see, this site is conservative because I said so". It doesn't work that way.

Neither-Just a Keith-and glad of it.

I have grossly simplified way of separating liberal from conservative:
You are not a "liberal" if you voted for GWB in 2000 or 2004.

Obviously this type of categorization may be inaccurate as to certain individuals, but overall it gives a fairly good picture.

That's it then. Results confirmed. Case closed.

Posted by Pirate

Well done Pirate! Another complete liberal ass kicking completed. Stick with smoke stacks on the moon next time Bob.

Danni
Spud
Nullifidian
Truthhurts
ManyPaths
Moder8
Herm
Hans
Yomama
Moneywar
Zatoichi
Redneckville
SilverIronist
Yav
Zot

MORE---
Betelg
Boyd
Cooper
Ray
Denise
Lisa
Trees
Rev Darko
Bill O'Reilly (or is that Null?)
AU

25 total..

And IMHO most folks are moderate--there are few "flaming liberals and conservatives" on this site as a general rule.

And some folks cross over--depending on the issue.

It seems about even.

Murphy

In other words, you're too lazy to come up with your own list, or you know you can't refute Bob's point.

Posted by nullifidian at 2008-04-09 04:10 PM


If I come up with my own list, I am expressing my opinion. If bob comes up with his list he is expressing his opinion. What does this prove?

A: Nothing.

Murphy, if you're going to keep track, don't forget about the 35 different names Boyd posts under.

In other words, you're too lazy to come up with your own list, or you know you can't refute Bob's point.

----

I've already come with a list. You have to come up with a list to refute my list. Get to work...

...or are you too lazy?

bob's list is wrong. I am not a conservative.

26 with Bob--

since most of the conservative names will inevitably be multiple handles for the same poster, the numbers will likely become skewed.

and it amazing how all the idiots are on the conservative list

At least Murphy has the balls to create a list, unlike some other lazy conservatives on this site.

Damn it WIS...your #1. No gloating!

Perhaps we should have some color on the site. Your handle could be "red" or "blue". That would make it easier. Libertarians would be transparent, like their politics.

dont forget larry mohr and tonyroma

Goat --

Guess BBob at least got the title of his other thread right today (grin)

"Goatman Sees No Smokestack on Moon"

How about you? Are your eyes lying to you again, or can you successfully ignore reality too?

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 02:38 PM | 12 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry

Wow. Proof positive that absolutely ANY topic can degenerate into acrimony on the good ol' DR.

He has met the burden of proof. No one else can come up with a list of the left that comes close

He has proven nothing but his opinion. E.G. he has me on the conservative list, but I am not

"Bill O'Reilly (or is that Null?)"

You're counting me twice, Murphy. Also, Boyd/Betel/Cooper are one poster. Better adjust your count down by at least 4.

"and it amazing how all the idiots are on the conservative list"



and how many morons believe bob's list mean shit.

no he smells like #1, tries to blame it on the cheese

dont forget zed

Wow. Proof positive that absolutely ANY topic can degenerate
into acrimony on the good ol' DR.

That's why DR will go on forever and ever :)

Guess BBob at least got the title of his other thread right today (grin)

Goatman Sees No Smokestack on Moon

Yes, it's true, but it's only a partial truth, of course. It would have been more accurate to have titled it "No one sees smokestacks on the moon except bob"

If I come up with my own list, I am expressing my opinion. If bob comes up with his list he is expressing his opinion. What does this prove?

A: Nothing.

Posted by goatman at 2008-04-09 04:12 PM

DING!DING!DING!

"Yes, it's true, but it's only a partial truth, of course. It would have been more accurate to have titled it 'No one sees smokestacks on the moon except bob'"

Well duh, Goat. It should be obvious to anyone with a brain that they are grain silos.

skizziks
r8h8r
the nether
northguy
jeffndenmark

"and how many morons believe bob's list mean shit.

Posted by salamandagator"


It's a fairly accurate enumeration of the right-of-center posters on this site. Obviously there are going to be a few that dispute their inclusion, just as there would be a few that would dispute their inclusion on a left-of-center list.

It's a fairly accurate enumeration of the right-of-center posters on this site

In the opinion of a liberal. How about in the opinion of an unbiased person?

1. jomama, 2. danni, 3. larry, 4. dethspud, 5. rcade, 6. revdarko, 7. manypaths, 8. beekeeper, 9. muzziah, 10. corky, 11. ness, 12. r8, 13. midiman, 14. reinheitsgebot, 15. panchovilla, 16. sambarber, 17. frankf55, 18. klifferd, 19. americanunity, 20. keith204, 21. oldwhiskeysour, 22. sitdown, 23. montecore, 24. timbci, 25. commonsense, 26. usatrueandblue7, 27. john kavanaugh, 28. donnerboy, 29. sully, 30. anticadillac, 31. silence, 32. generico, 33. gal tuesday, 34. georgeisadrunk, 35. redneckville, 36. yav, 37. 726, 38. ozarkannie, 39. herm, 40. angrydad, 41. moneywar, 42. herm, 43. northguy3, 44. truthhurts, 45. yomelib, 46. silence, 47. danforth, 48. sanantoniorogue, 49. ignoramus, 50. rastacyborg, 51. furio, 52. regime change, 53. skip wellington, 54. apocalypto, 55. mcduff, 56. lipzoidal, 57. darthcheney...

i'll be bock...

"How about in the opinion of an unbiased person?"

Tadowe doesn't post here anymore.

commonsense
shotguncheney
alexandrite
nessgadol

Can we start a list of crazies?

Red
Celisary
Nutcase

how bout a list of assholes

rob the asshole
101 chairborne asshole
crispee assholeC
shirtsbyasshole

"How about in the opinion of an unbiased person?"

An unbiased person would say that most of those on Bob's list are, in fact, right of center.

how bout a list of assholes

rob the asshole
101 chairborne asshole
crispee assholeC
shirtsbyasshole

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:39 PM |

Seeing as everyone knows where your head is most of the time, I will adhere to your expertise in regards to assholes. Good job.

"How about in the opinion of an unbiased person?"

Tadowe doesn't post here anymore.

Posted by SanAntonioRogue at 2008-04-09 04:32 PM

ff !

I miss Tadowe, though. Wish he'd start posting again.

coming from some with PEE in their handle, i am sooooooo hurt

Well at least Nanc wasn't too lazy to take up the challenge, unlike the other conservative whiners around here.

"
An unbiased person would say that most of those on Bob's list are, in fact, right of center."




Define center there buddy.

Can we start a list of crazies?

redneckville, buffalo_bob, cooper/badweek/betel (definitely schizophrenic!)

crazies

forgot Ray

Well at least Nanc wasn't too lazy to take up the challenge, unlike the other conservative whiners around here.

Posted by nullifidian at 2008-04-09 04:43 PM

Nullidiot, I put up the first 15 names on the list.

coming from some with PEE in their handle, i am sooooooo hurt

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:42 PM |


I see you have graduated to eigth grade level. A step up???

"Nullidiot, I put up the first 15 names on the list."

So what? You want a medal?

crazies

forgot Ray

Crazy like a fox.

Gold is over $1000 an ounce. He's laughing all the way to the bank.

An unbiased person would say that most of those on Bob's list are, in fact, right of center.

Again, says a liberal.

One must be truly unbiased to make such a claim. You are not. You lean to the left

So what? You want a medal?

That will do for a start. I'll provide the rest of my list later.

coming from some with PEE in their handle, i am sooooooo hurt

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:42 PM |


I see you have graduated to eigth grade level. A step up???

Posted by crispee_oc at 2008-04-09 04:47 PM |



you started it.

Well at least Nanc wasn't too lazy to take up the challenge, unlike the other conservative whiners around here.

----

You can't say X > Y without knowing both values. It's not up to somebody else to determine one of those values. It's up to person making the claim to provide the values because they have to know the values in order to say one is greater than the other.

So what? You want a medal?

That will do for a start. I'll provide the rest of my list later.



Posted by CalifChris


you'll need a chest to pin it on.

All those on Nanc's list are the same guy.

'Cept fer me and Nulli. We are Peabody Award winners!

But seriously folks, as someone originally hated by the right for not bowing and scraping before their Dear Leader and now hated by the left for not swallowing the Obamiade, I can tell you that while it is true that the right is typically denser, the left whines more when you pinch it.

I see you have graduated to eigth grade level. A step up???

Posted by crispee_oc at 2008-04-09 04:47 PM |



you started it.

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:50 PM |


You mother wears army boots.

Crazy like a fox.


Gold is over $1000 an ounce. He's laughing all the way to the bank.


Not according to ray. He is hoarding it. Doesn't matter what the price is if you don't cash it in.

I once had several tens of thousands of dollars of Worldcom stock.

*sigh*

I see you have graduated to eigth grade level. A step up???

Posted by crispee_oc at 2008-04-09 04:47 PM |



you started it.

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:50 PM |


You mother wears army boots.

Posted by crispee_oc at



Your father refills cream donuts

Your father refills cream donuts

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:54 PM


At least I had a father.

"and how many believe bob's list mean shit."
Posted by salamandagator at 2008-04-09 04:18 PM


YEAH!

I think it says allot!

It says to me that The Retort, unlike redstate, green footballs, seanhannity, culture watch, Christian coalition and all the other supposed "conservative" opinion sites that ban you for breathing something unflattering, (even when true) is truly a free place to post any opinion ----- and as exploited repeatedly by some here, even allows those with no tact or manners to insult and attack the host himself (apparently a "Value" some hold close)!

And I should add, I feel quite comfortable and in good company by being attached to the list of what I perceive as the Freedom and Democracy for ALL Champions in this online community!

Therefore I propose we change the nomenclature from "Liberal" to Liberty and Freedom Champions ---------- and "conservative" to Lying Douchebag Authoritarians with No Manners and little Self-Esteem!

"One must be truly unbiased to make such a claim. You are not. You lean to the left"

I'm aware of my biases. That being said, Bob's list is a pretty accurate enumeration of right-of-center posters here. Just because one or two posters don't think they belong there doesn't invalidate the list.

"We are Peabody Award winners!"

More like his boy Sherman in your case.

you'll need a chest to pin it on.

Posted by truthhurts at 2008-04-09 04:51 PM

My chest is more than ample, thank you.

Your sister swims out to meet troopships
The troopship rejected your sister
sister blows dogs for nickels
Your mother does powersquats on fireplugs
Your grandmother gives gummers to plumbers
Your mother doesn't wipe, she drip dries
Your sister sticks to the couch
Your grandpa licks moose cum off branches
Your dog has a big bloddy asshole
Your brother eats corn out of feces
Your father was a cucumber
Your mother gives handjobs to pilots
Your grandmother freefalls on flagpoles
Your father's in love with a toaster

Your sister swims out to meet troopships
The troopship rejected your sister
sister blows dogs for nickels
Your mother does powersquats on fireplugs
Your grandmother gives gummers to plumbers
Your mother doesn't wipe, she drip dries
Your sister sticks to the couch
Your grandpa licks moose cum off branches
Your dog has a big bloddy asshole
Your brother eats corn out of feces
Your father was a cucumber
Your mother gives handjobs to pilots
Your grandmother freefalls on flagpoles
Your father's in love with a toaster

I have been told that Libs far outnumber rightwing nutjobs on this site. Let's count and see.



Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 12:20 PM

Maybe it should be re-phrased to read leftwing whining liberals far outnumber...

Truth,
I see you regressed back to 6th grade. Say what you will about my family, just don't insult my dog.

Your sister gives blowjobs to statues.

Your mother does cartwheels on doorknobs.

Your father's in love with a bagel.

Your sister's in love with a carrot.

The carrot rejected your sister.

Your mother's best friend is a fence post.

Your father likes small, furry animals.

Your father fucks Butterball turkeys.

Your brother's class ring's in your sister.

ok, thank you everyone! I will be back here later tonight, please buy a CD!

rat tat ta do do

good night and drive safe

"I think it says allot!"


or maybe it point out the complete lack, of some when it come to reason or logic. Not to insult you or anything i think you do quite fine in that by yourself.

as someone originally hated by the right for not bowing and scraping before their Dear Leader and now hated by the left for not swallowing the Obamiade,
Posted by Corky at 2008-04-09 04:52 PM

Whoa...hate is a strong word. I think you are way overstating your value as an irritant .

Nuh-uh!

I am a very valuable irritant I'll have you know!
Hated by many, loved by few...... can you tell how much this hurts me?

Whoa...hate is a strong word. I think you are way overstating your value as an irritant .

Yeah. Don't sell yourself short, you are a tremendous slouch.

Nanc

Let's make the list of posters who have posted in the last week, and you have to be able to post a link to their liberal/conservative rant.

I never heard of half your posters, and can only assume you either made them up or they are old old posters. I haven't put Tadowe on my list.

Also, OzarkAnnie would be pissed if you put her on your list. She's already on mine.

I wanna recount.



Bob

This is Not a Liberal Site

Considering the amount of bitching and moaning going on over it, I BEG TO DIFFER!!!!

Bob says make a list. A list is made. Bob complains about said list.

Any surprise?

Bob says make a list. A list is made. Bob complains about said list.

Any surprise?

Slightly. Where's the link to Youtube?

FF

Hated by many, loved by few......
Posted by Corky

Hillary and her daughter, Ms. Needs a Makeover is two, who's the third?

"Therefore I propose we change the nomenclature from "Liberal" to Liberty and Freedom Champions ---------- and "conservative" to Lying Douchebag Authoritarians with No Manners and little Self-Esteem!"

Redneck could we shorten "Lying Douchebag Authoritarians with No Manners and little Self-Esteem!" to just LDAs???

It would be like O'rielly's SPs.

TRUTH-
I'm amazed at how well you know my family. Are you my daddy?

Posted by OohRah


no that would be John er a John

"and er-ah when I returned, Mary Joe and the cah where gone"

My facts must be getting to Nancy. She has me in there twice. Mighty far down on the list, I might add. herm

"This is Not a Liberal Site" Considering the amount of bitching and moaning going on over it, I BEG TO DIFFER!!!!

This just in to refute Manypaths: A content analysis by an unimpeachable source (everyone in the Bush years is unimpeachable) reveals 78.3 percent of all DR bitching and moaning is by righties incensed over their tax bucks going to such radical innovations as social security and the post office. That does not even include those wailing about terminated pregnancies "killing innocent babies." herm

ive been a fan of this site for years, i remember danni and a person named tansurfergirl talking wierd one night, this is a nice place to go to get some prospective at times

wow over 8500 members here

What a weenie - I didn't make either list.

bluffalo - i went into the archives and ALL the posters i mentioned were within comments made in the last three weeks, but i'll go back farther if you'd like?

AH-OH!

we're taking over!

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahah
aha!

that's okay - all'y'all libs still scream the loudest and use the foulest of language - WOOT!

Nanc

I just went through todays, and said let's go back a week. I'll be asking for your links to the posters that I think you made up, so keep them handy.

Do yuou want to go back three weeks? One week? I htink One week would be plenty to prove my point if you had to go back three weeks to get your names and I really went through about five threads on todays posting.

You make the rules you think you can live with.

I say one week and have reliable links to the poster when asked.

Make it shorter or longer as you wish. The point will still stand.

Can you prove your statement that libs use the foulest language?

;-)

Actually 2-3 days would be the most current and easy to reference.

There are lots of "tests" on the net which "identify" a person's political leanings. If you want a real count, suggest a test, ask people to take it, see what they say they are, count them. No, wait, this is the DR ...

"I have grossly simplified way of separating liberal from conservative:
You are not a "liberal" if you voted for GWB in 2000 or 2004."

But that suggests that all those who didn't are liberals. However, I'd guess that those of us who voted neither repub nor dem would prefer to be in neither category.

easy, bluffalo - i went to the search engine in the mid-left section, put in the foulest word i could get my fingers to type and it brought up ALL the posts where that word could be found. then i went to those particular posts and scanned them.

even YOU can do it, bob!

Nanc

Let's make the list of posters who have posted in the last week, and you have to be able to post a link to their liberal/conservative rant.

Can you prove your statement that libs use the foulest language?

;-)

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-04-09 06:48 PM


"And after that I want you to prove...." says BuffaloBob

as another one falls into his web...

"Dance, dance" said the Puppetmaster.
Dance, dance for me, hee hee hee"

:)

there's one party cooler word you can type in that i've been called at least 10 times in the last month and i'll bet you can easily find that one, yes?

then, go to my posts and see just how many times i've called another poster a vile name.

he likes when i talk mean to him...

Fyi

If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative as far as I'm concerned. If you aren't for us you are against us--does that make sense to you? I bet it does.


1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague 57. 2112 58. Member 59. RightoCenter 60. Zatoichi 61. FYI

"he likes when i talk mean to him..."



he usually has to pay for that.

"If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative"

How pathetically stupid; Just like Limbaugh and Coulter.

Hint: The space is not two-dimensional; It is in fact Hilbert space.

Califchris

I'm not saying anyone has to do anything. But if you want to play in the game you gotta know the rules so everyone is on the same page.

If you don't want to play the game or play by the rules---notice I let Nanc set the rules as to time to search--then don't play.

Simple isn't it.


So far There are a lot more cons than libs on this site as far as recent posts go. Nanc went back three weeks to find her list, and then had some definite conservatives on it like Ozarkaggie. I went to 5 threads on todays threads. Does that tell you anything?

Hint: LOTS more cons than libs

;-)

I gotta agree, people shouldn't be calling others vile names. Much more interesting is to say things like:

"Takes poster 2 hours to watch '60-minutes'"

"If poster were any more stupid, he'd/she'd have to be watered twice a week."

"When poster's IQ reaches 50, he/she should sell."

"Some drink from the fountain of knowledge; he only gargled."

Banal, yes. But I leave it up to the ingenuity of the regulars for better.

[bluffalo] likes when i talk mean to him...

Posted by nanc at 2008-04-09 07:02 PM


Then softly whisper in BBob's ear "Goatman is right about everything."
That'll get the Buffalo's engine roaring :)

"If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative"

How pathetically stupid; Just like Limbaugh and Coulter.

Posted by Zatoichi at 2008-04-09 07:11 PM


Or your point of view. Which is what? Oh yeah---you never say anything. You should try to say it with less words.

;-)

I consider myself a moderate but would assume that NeoCons will call me liberal anyway.

Califchris

If you don't want to play the game or play by the rules...then don't play.

Simple isn't it.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob

aww, kiss kiss

"You should try to say it with less(sic) words."


When you use as few as necessary?

(BTW I'm betting no one gets the joke.)

BuffaloB,

Yeah, I'm sure it makes sense to you. To me the "for us or against us" is medieval. And isn't that what we're supposed to be growing up from?

ZAT

BBob said to you...

...you never say anything.

Well, that's about as saying something with "less words" as one can get.

I got it.

BuffaloB,

Wow, you put me on the con list! Gotta cut this out and show my friends! It is a bummer, though. I took all those net "tests" and they all said otherwise. Guess they need to be replaced by the BB test.

I get the point you're trying to make with this thread. But you're beating a dead horse and it's just funny.

No he is beating OFF to a dead horse.
Big difference.

"If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative as far as I'm concerned."


You ask us to go with your definition of a lib and a con but you even think corporate power is i a sigh of communism. I for one refuse your judgment. so neener neener neener

We're all here because we're not all there.


It's a South Austin joke.
It's a quantum mechanics joke.
It's a psychology joke.
It's a fact.

FYI

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague 57. 2112 58. Member 59. RightoCenter 60. Zatoichi

My mistake. I should have read more than just one post. Sorry.

My list contains well known names posting today. The list Nanc had was half gull of people I never heard of and she had to go back three weeks to get that many names and even then she had well known conservatives on her list.

I think the point is made. There are far more Conservatives posting on this site than Liberals.

You ask us to go with your definition of a lib and a con but you even think corporate power is i a sigh of communism. I for one refuse your judgment. so neener neener neener

Posted by salamandagator at 2008-04-09 07:43 PM |


Only you say I say corporate power is a sign of Communism. I never say that. I say corporate power is a sign of fascism.

However, continue with your lies. As Bush has taught you, soon lots of peope will believe you and trust you.

"I think the point is made. There are far more Conservatives posting on this site than Liberals."


You could make the same argument that your list contains only ball point pens or fish sticks it would have as much validity. Just because you say it doesn't make it true. But go ahead define people your way whatever appeases those damned voices.

We're all here because we're not all there.

It's a South Austin joke.
It's a quantum mechanics joke.
It's a psychology joke.
It's a fact.

Cos no matter where you go... there you are.

Luff that picture of Max.

Best book: Vonnegut: The Cat Who Walked Through Walls.

Actually, that's Robert Heinlein.

Vonnegut did Cat's Cradle.

Spud read 'em both and luffs 'em!

Back on Topic?

The fact that Rcade tolerates the type of 3rd grade mentality trolls who can't debate to save their own lives anmd who would prolly get kicked out of every other site in blog-world would seem, to Spud at least, to be proof positive that this is a very liberal site, indeed.

Hell, even the right wing trolls (which is pretty much all of them) couldn't cut it on Free Republic fer fark's sakes!

Too many parts of blog-world have agendas or at the very least standards and this place is largely free of such interferences.

The fact that a shiatload of right wing troll would, over time, gravitate to this place seems practically inevitable in hindsight.

But to cut people out of public debate simply because their information base is horribly flawed or practically non-existent is wrong. Too many people think, argue and hold crazy assed stupid ideas like the idjits found here at the Retort and it doesn't do to banish them all to non-existence in blogworld.

They must be tutored in the ways of righteousness.

That's why dethspud is here, btw.

/In case anybody was still wondering.

Be Well.

"Only you say I say corporate power is a sign of Communism. I never say that. I say corporate power is a sign of fascism."


tell you what i'll prove it, but then i want an apology.

Deal?

Mr Fair is right of center--you forgot one Bob.

It's about even.

Null--FF--I thought Boyd Betelg and Cooper were the same!

Murphy

"

Best book: Vonnegut: The Cat Who Walked Through Walls.

Actually, that's Robert Heinlein.

"

I am so busted.

Little did we know then! No one could have imagined at the time that the Republican Party would evolve into the new Communists of the 21st century!

Posted by Redneckville

How did you make that connection?

Posted by Sniper at 2008-04-01 05:03 PM | Reply | Flag:



I'm not sure how he made the connection, but here is how I make the connection.

When your phone can be tapped at government discretion--that's a connection.

When you can be thrown in prison without a trial or counsel forever, that's a connection.

When you start wars with countries that are no threat to you, that's a connection.

When you keep secrets from the public about a major attack on our nation, that's a connection.

When government is more interested in twisting elections than finding out the will of the people, that's a connection.

When government places the interests of big business over the welfare of the populace, that's a connection.

When a President thinks he can decide which laws he will follow and which laws he doesn't, that's a connection.

There are more, but I'm sure their mention would be as meaningless to you as the ones already stated.

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-04-01 05:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

So now apologize and tell me you misspoke.

BuffaloB,

Thanks both ways. Especially since I've copied it. My friends always like having something to laugh at re me, so I gotta keep them supplied. Amazingly enough, you got my age almost right.

For years on this site, I have spoken out extensively in favor of abortion, in favor of gay marriage, against the Iraq war, against corporate welfare, in favor of legalizing drugs, and for many other topics that would be considered "liberal." If buffalo bob is too stupid to find those posts, that does not mean that I belong on his list. All it means is that his incessant need to classify people is misguided and obnoxious.

"Cos no matter where you go... there you are."

Not according to quantum physics. You can only be one of the two! Unless they've opened the box and you're a dead cat.

"They must be tutored in the ways of righteousness."

Thank you, grasshopper.

C'mon, Joe, it's libertarians like you who ruin all the good games!

If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative as far as I'm concerned.

Figures. The word "moderate" is not in the bOoB's vocabulary. Nor is the word "gray". Everything is black or white, left or right.

What a sorry world you live in, bOoB. Diversity is what makes this planet great. I would hate it if I lived in a binary world like you.

Simple isn't it.

You say that a lot. I wonder why your mind comes up with the word "simple" so easily?

Wow, you put me on the con list! Gotta cut this out and show my friends!

I did the same here on the rig. I printed out and took the list to dinner. Of course they don't know the others, but I am known as Goatman on the rig, so they knew me. Several guys about choked they laughed so hard. Seriously, I am one of the "bleeding heart liberals" of the rig in their eyes.

Goatman-
You don't hang with the enlisted, but with the invested, I'm guessin'.

I think the point is made. There are far more Conservatives posting on this site than Liberals

HA HA HA! You lose, bOoB! The cons are took over! The strong survive. Must've been Roe v Wade aborting their own.

Actually, that's Robert Heinlein

Beat me to it. Good catch

Vonnegut did Cat's Cradle.

Which is indeed Vonnegut's best book -- well tied with Sirens of Titan

Have you read Mother Night?

"You can only be one of the two!"

Flunking out of physics must have hurt.

Kill yourself soon and do not reproduce.

I know what you mean, Joe. I've always said the following:

don't like bush
don't believe in war in iraq
believe in gay rights
don't believe in corporate welfare
don't believe in prayer in school
I'm an atheist
against capital punishment
against war on drugs
pro choice (1st trimester)
I compost, recycle, conserve energy
Have voted Democrat far, far more than I have republican (except for president)

And the bOoB thinks I'm a conservative. It is these qualities why my co-workers say I'm a bleeding heart liberal.

But then again, the bOoB sees smokestacks on the moon. What do you expect from that kind of a mind?

Libertarian, atheist, Pistons fan.

The dumbest fucks of all list:

SpudDud(tm)
NULLandVOID
FrankFreak55(tm)
Redneckville

THESE ARE THE FACTS

You don't hang with the enlisted, but with the invested, I'm guessin'.

What does this mean? I was an enlisted man once, if that's what you are referring to.

P.S. BuffaloBobShit(tm) is mercifully excluded from the "dumbest fucks of all" list. He's simply an occupant at the looney bin.

Have you read Mother Night?

I've read every book Vonnegut wrote

I'm an atheist
...
...
...Posted by goatman at 2008-04-09 08:

I thought it was agreed upon you were an agnostic, not an atheist?

The dumbest fucks of all list:

...
...
THESE ARE THE FACTS

Posted by ride_on at 2008-04-09 08:43 PM

Hah! you never disappoint me.
I knew you'd find your own special category for some on the list if we only gave you enough time.

BBob

Why is your list only one side or the other?
Why can't we have a "moderate" list for those whose thinking lies more in the middle?

I thought it was agreed upon you were an agnostic, not an atheist?

I didn't agree to it, you did. *G*

Libertarian, atheist, Austrian economics, anti-authoritarian

Why is your list only one side or the other?
Why can't we have a "moderate" list for those whose thinking lies more in the middle?

the bOoB's brain isn't big enough to handle more than two concepts.

what, bluffalo - no retort?

Mother Night is his best.

hmmmm...goatman vs. bluffalo...goatman everytime!

I knew you'd find your own special category for some on the list if we only gave you enough time.

Posted by CalifChris at 2008-04-09 08:53 PM | Reply | Flag:

CC, I didn't need "enough time". I haven't been on this thread very long. The list I posted and its members is so obvious. FACTS ya' know.

P.S. It's not my special category. It's a DR FACT CATEGORY...hehehe.

I didn't agree to it, you did. *G*

Humf.

"Why can't we have a "moderate" list for those whose thinking lies more in the middle?"

Probably because it would be too short. And for once I'm being serious. Hell, I'm an independent but you'd have to push to make a case for labelling me a moderate. I'd back an independents list though. But it's not the Buffalo's point. He's obviously gone overboard in some cases, but all he's really trying to do is disprove a single statement, that this forum leans heavily towards liberals. And I agree that it doesn't. The lil' tater's comments notwithstanding.

"Libertarian, atheist, Austrian economics, anti-authoritarian"

Why are you stuttering?

NANC, whenever it's anyone on the DR vs. BuffaloBobShit(tm)....the BobShit ALWAYS loses (same in his "life" at the looney bin too).....

Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2008-04-09 07:08

BB thinks I'm a conservative as if this world is composed of liberals and conservatives and nothing else. I won't forget that degrading insult BB.

"Spud still thinks that Player Piano is his best work."

No way! Not even close, dude. Player Piano ranks along with Bluebeard and Galapagos: In Player Piano he hadn't yet found his voice, and in the latter two he was losing his voice.

The Buffalo obviously likes being argumentive. In doing so, he more than occasionally makes preposterous statements and takes some positions that leave me wondering. He has some wacky beliefs. But he also makes some very interesting and accurate points. And his toe-to-toes with the Goat are very humorous. Hell of a lot better than sticking your hand in a bucket of shit to find a dime, like you have to do with some posters here.

didn't agree to it, you did. *G*

Humf.

Posted by CalifChris at 2008-04-09

typo:

humf - humph

Ray,


I really enjoy those occurrences where you are accused of being a neocon (based upon your Laissez faire economic theories) and a far-left liberal (for your anti projection of US military might) on the same thread.

Wait - I am a "rabid" koolaid drinking Obama supporter, and now I am a righty tighty? Whut? In all honesty I am a republicrat, which I stated day one when I joined here.

JEFFJ, those that do that to Ray and others....the biggest offenders.....they are on the FACTUAL DR "dumbest fucks" list that I posted.

the FACTUAL DR

WTF?

WideOn you are the least factual poster on the DR.

Yer posts consist largely of insane insults and contain very little argument at all.
When you do try to argue you always FAIL.
You wouldn't know a fact if it kicked you in the teeth.

You are, in a word, insane.

Be Well.

Nobody would argue about the Most Worthless Trolls list:

1 - 10: RideOn

SpudDud(tm), you are on the OFFICIAL DR FACTUAL "dumbest fucks" list. But, relax....your fellow "dumbest fucks" can keep you company as always. Go back and check the list so you can commiserate with them.

See SpudDud(tm) one of your fellow "dumbest fucks" just joined you.....right on cue as normal.

You are, in a word, insane.
Posted by dethspud

How does it feel to post 1 part insult to 99 parts Canadian bullshit? BTW, is Jenney Craig from Canada?

Nobody would argue about the Most Worthless Trolls list:

1 - 10: RideOn

Posted by nullifidian


I happen to like Ride, but that was really, really funny.


(Sorry Ride)

....oh and SpudDud(tm), don't diss a fellow DR poster's deceased spouse or a poster about that ever again....and NULLandVOID, when you asked for my home address so you could show me "how lucky" I am that I'm stating posts only on a blog and not to you in person.....well, if you only knew....even you would then know you are dumber than dirt. I really apologize to dirt for that comment.

No problem JeffJ.....and it still flew in the face of NULLandVOID's "Nobody" comment. Not a surprise.

Bob - care to explain how the Obama campaign headquarters in my town is in my office? Yeah, didn't think so.

Ride
I would add Bushlover2 and Danni to the dumbest fucks list.

Jeff
Liberals for welfare, against warfare.
Conservatives against welfare, for warfare.
Libertarians against welfare and warfare.

At least I'm consistent with a small government. The dumbass liberals and conservatives think they can have one and not the other. That's impossible. What we get between the two rivals is warfare AND welfare.

"I happen to like Ride"

Why? He has never engaged in an argument as long as he's been here. Doesn't have the brains or the balls. He just endlessly repeats the one "joke" that somebody else came up with, i.e. attaching "(tm)" to some lame caricature of a poster's name.

Geeze, BBob, your topic must have struck a nerve.
It's only been up since around Noon and already you've got about 280 posts!

I hear your opinion Ray, but I wouldn't add those to the list. The list is made up of non debatable DR FACTS, dontcha' know. So it will remain 100% indisputable and stand as written.

At least I'm consistent with a small government.


Yes, very consistent.


My comment wasn't intended as a snipe toward you.
It was intended to mock those (on both sides of center) who attempt to pigeonhole someone with a label. You just happened to be both present, and a perfect "Exhibit A" of the occasional stupidity of labels.

"Libertarians against welfare and warfare."

Libertarians for robber barons and sweat shops.

Buzzer sound......wrong again NULLandVOID. I don't list (tm) on your name Billy'O'Crap'O (which the DR Left came up with) or to your NULLandVOID name which someone else came up with. Oh, I'd like to take credit for those but, I can't/won't as others so aptly named you.........

I nominate Nullified for the dumbest troll.

He owns it Ray. Nomination not required.

It's only been up since around Noon and already you've got about 280 posts!

Posted by CalifChris

It's a celebration on his first coherent thread posting since 2002.

i happen to like goatman and dethspud. call me a masochist!

bwah!

bluffalo is just a little tetchy for me...

Most Paranoid List:

1-10: Ray
11: JeffnDenmark

Lists made by people that are on the FACTUAL DR "dumbest fucks" list don't count for anything. They are meaningless.

SpudDud(tm) is a Masochist....NANC. He has to live with himself. You really don't want us to call him now, do ya'? Naw, you don't.

They are meaningless.

Posted by ride_on

Or Canadian.

How can anybody get paranoid over a dumb troll? They have the brains of a mouse and a squeak to match. Little pest maybe.

They are meaningless.

Posted by ride_on

Or Canadian.

Posted by wisgod at 2008-04-09 09:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

Good catch WisGod, as they are one and the same.....

Excellent!


A "Ray vs. Reilly" fight warming up!

Grab the popcorn and a coupla cool ones, fellas.

This one could be a doozy!

Corky is a con, lib, independent, etc.......














What is the answer.




















All of the above.

Right SYBIL? Please, go find yourself SYBIL.

A "Ray vs. Reilly" fight warming up!


Posted by JeffJ

Leave it to Bill to put a dollar in a 10 cent ass kicking machine.

"A "Ray vs. Reilly" fight warming up!"

Not today, Jeff. Ray is rather obsessed with me because I bash rightwing libertarians all the time. That's ok. The Internet has plenty of paranoid crackpots who believe in all kinds of weird shit, like Austrian economics, alternative-health snake oil, the "Electric Universe," the gold standard, etc.

In fact, the Internet is about the only place you can find these strange people. Which is good.

I've spent too much time with him, Jeff. It was fun for a while. But now he bores me. I'm done for the night.

Listen FACTUAL DR "dumbest fuck" list member......no one is obsessed with you. It is simply very easy to make fun of you, especially since you make it so easy with your constant idiocy. You are so stupid you don't even recognize it. But the FACTUAL DR "dumbest fuck" list is a testament to it. ROFLMAO.

I'm done for the night.

Good night, Ray.



Not today, Jeff.

That makes me sad. I remember a day on the DR in which I could goad the likes of Ray and Reilly into a cyber-fight. Apparently, this is no longer the case.


I've either lost my touch, or I just suck (have fun with THAT slow-curve, you bitches).

If you've moved from touch to suck....you could sell seminars.

Well, I for one would like to ackowledge Bob for providing another avenue for the hand full of Conservatives, who have given a beating to the liberals, the likes of which haven't been seen since 2004 when Bush made Kerry his bitch.

I've got the popcorn ready and my money's on Ray.

If you've moved from touch to suck....you could sell seminars.

Posted by ride_on


I'd force my wife to be my first customer.

Now that is a softball JeffJ.

Therefore, I won't post the obligatory DR response.....that no one here has EVER HAD TO FORCE HER.

my money's on Ray.


I don't know, Chris.


First off, Ray is getting up there in age.


Secondly, Reilly is a Marxist, which means he's an instinctive thug.

My money is on Reilly - he'd start with a swift kick to Ray's ball-sack, and then he'd go Stalin on him from there.

Ray loses the fight before he even starts it.

that no one here has EVER HAD TO FORCE HER.


Absolutely not!

She's very "hand's on" - she's always been fascinated by large objects.

Chinese worker calls boss and says, "I no be work today...very sick".

The boss knows better and guides Wong with these astute words, "Wong, whenever I feel sick, I go home and have sex with my wife. Then everything is better and I go happily back to work. You go try that."

"OK boss" says Wong.

A bit later Wong shows up to work. "Hey boss thank for advice, really do feel better now. Not sick. Thank you."





















"By way, you have nice house".

She's very "hand's on" - she's always been fascinated by large objects.

Posted by JeffJ at 2008-04-09 10:23 PM | Reply | Flag:

I already know that..........

My money is on Reilly - he'd start with a swift kick to Ray's ball-sack, and then he'd go Stalin on him from there.

Ray loses the fight before he even starts it.

Posted by JeffJ at 2008-04-09 10:21 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

I disagree entirely. I believe a swift kick to the balls of an older set of nuts wouldn't hurt as bad as say a mid 20's Year old set cause the older pair are flabby and more relaxed compared to the Younger set. Of course elderly have an advantage they can take their canes and do so much more damage than the younger set. Oh and if all else fails they can eject their false teeth and use them as throwing devices. Just a thought.

Larry Mohr

Sheesh, Larry you seem to know waaaaaaayyyyyyy too much about balls of various ages..............

Must have not taken care of an elderly guy before have You Ride On??

Larry Mohr

I have had some pretty lengthy debates with Ray, Jeff. Some of them over 100 posts over a couple of days between us. It's not for me to judge who "won" those debates. There are people here who debate, and then there are eunuchs like RideOn who don't have the balls or intellect to debate.

Must have not taken care of an elderly guy before have You Ride On??

Larry Mohr

Oh fuck, another feather in your hat.

I already know that..........


Keep that up (pun intended) and I'll invoke Frank Cotton on your ass!



Null,

I have had some pretty lengthy debates with Ray, Jeff. Some of them over 100 posts over a couple of days between us.

I know. I've personally witnessed (and enjoyed) a couple of them.

It's been awhile - aren't you two ideologue clowns overdue for another one?

THIS IS A LIBERAL SITE.....DRUDGE RETORT IS A RIP OFF FROM A RIGHT WING NEWS SITE

TRUST ME THEIR ARE FAR MORE LIBERALS ON THIS SITE THAN ON KOAs

Oh fuck, another feather in your hat.


Posted by wisgod at 2008-04-09 10:30 PM | Reply

Huh???

Larry

Must have not taken care of an elderly guy before have You Ride On??

Larry Mohr

Posted by LarryMohr at 2008-04-09 10:29 PM | Reply | Flag

Uhhhh, no Larry I haven't. In fact I've never "taken care of" any guy.

PS - I believe it's spelled "Eunichs"


I decided to go for the change-up....

Instead of going Drudge Nanny on you I thought I'd be the spelling Nazi instead.

I am more comfortable being a Nazi than a Nanny anyways - as you are certainly aware.

We're just messin' with ya' Larry.

I think I just pissed myself........

"It's been awhile - aren't you two ideologue clowns overdue for another one?"

That should be "ideological clowns." Maybe I'll go all Stalin on him the next time he shows up, just for your entertainment.

"PS - I believe it's spelled "Eunichs"

I believe you're wrong.

EUNUCHS

Gotta run.


Props to BBob for setting up this thread - it garnered a shitload of responses.


I set up a thread once with similar response - the headline read "Who's the Biggest Douche in DR History?"


Every single site member weighed in - it was an 800+ post thread overall. Regrettably, "JeffJ" was at the top of everybody's list.

That thread was more than a backfire; it was the quintessential self-retorting retort (tm), albeit an uncnscious self-retort.

Must have not taken care of an elderly guy before have you NULLIFIDIAN??

Larry Mohr

Posted by LarryMohr at 2008-04-09 10:29 PM | Reply | Flag

"It's been awhile - I'm overdue to do another one"

Posted by nullifidian at 2008-04-09 10:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

That's not cool Ride On. Had I have actually posted it then it would be a different story.

Larry Mohr

BWAHAHAHHA. that's it. Time to hit the shower and the rack.

That should be "ideological clowns." Maybe I'll go all Stalin on him the next time he shows up, just for your entertainment.
Posted by nullifidian


Could that "Stalin" stuff also include an icepick to the head, a la Trotsky in Mexico City?

I believe you're wrong.

You are correct. Shit! I try to be Nazi and fail!



Maybe I'll go all Stalin on him the next time he shows up, just for your entertainment.

You'd better!

If not, I'll have Murphy spike your Margarita with eye-drop solution.


Later.


PS - apologies that your beloved UCLA lost in the Final 4.


PPS - I expect similar condolences if my beloved Red Wings don't take the cup this year.

I think I just pissed myself........

Posted by wisgod at 2008-04-09 10:37 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yep, it's been a good night. I think a lot of the DR opinion mongering was also definitely and definitively put to rest with the publishing of THE FACTUAL DR "dumbest fucks" list. Opinionating was rendered NULLandVOID once and for all! Thanks for this FACTUAL based forum RCADE.

"That's not cool Ride On. Had I have actually posted it then it would be a different story."


It's to be expected from that eunuch. He/she is not the official Most Worthless Troll for nothing.

It's hilarous that any of you think you have a choice. Left, right, it doesn't matter.

At any time, me and the boyz could shut this place down again.

And there is nothing that could be done to stop it.

Just remember who emailed you Larry when things were at a low point and urged you to come back and stay on the DR.

The post above.....it was a joke Larry...a joke.

Plus, remember NULLandVOID, posts from people on THE FACTUAL DR "dumbest fucks" list don't count, they are meaningless.

If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative as far as I'm concerned. If you aren't for us you are against us--does that make sense to you? I bet it does.

This little passage speaks volumes.

1. "If you aren't a liberal, you are a conservative"

Either/or mentality that characterize all of BB's posts.

2. "As far as I'm concerned."

Self appointed arbiter and judge of all things.

3. "If you aren't for us you are against us,"

Underlying paranoia with a bit of a persecution complex. Plus the ever present misunderstanding and twisting of biblical ideas to suit his own preconceived agenda. Here it is found in the inversion of the biblical passage: "For he that is not against us is for us." Mark 9:40. Bob wishes to know how to exclude people rather than include them.

4."does that make sense to you? I bet it does."

Claims that he knows what you believe better than you do.



Feel free to apply your labels in whatever way you choose. This thread reveals more about you than about anyone else. Just keep in mind the purpose of applying such labels.

If you remember Junior High School, the answer will come to you.



Us and Them
And after all we're only ordinary men
Me, and you
God only knows it's not what we would choose to do

THE FACTUAL DR "dumbest fucks" list don't count, they are meaningless.

Posted by ride_on




The finest example of irony I have seen in quite some time.

Austrian economics?

I think the Austrians would claim this works rather well for them. What? Charge 14% tax to all and that's it.

Sounds like a Fair Tax issue here.

And who was the guy who --Von Misas--what happened to him?

He said to go lock in the interest rate on our house--we did--and saving buckets of money since.

And Jeff--Don't be giving away bartender secrets about eye drops.

It works BTW.

And Congrats to me--I am now the OWNER of my business--not just the Branch Manager--Wahoo for me!

Murphy

i think i forgot tony roma and corky...

Oh, and Murphy- CONGRATS on owning the business! (for real). That's outstanding. Best wishes for success.

next, bluffalo will want us to define "troll".

So the bastards raised the rate since 2004 ey'.

Typical Democrat mentality.

That's one reason it can't get done here--they would start at one rate and then raise it every year until they were at 50%.

So what one does in Austria--is become a tourist!

Murphy

"Austrian economics?"

Uh, Murphy, that doesn't refer to the economic policies of Austria.

add "reznworks" to my list.

Awesome armory in Graz. I like that town.

Thanks Yav--

And on continuing to build an empire--I sent the Hubby back to school!

He is there tonight for his first of 9 classes. He is going to write appraisals/damage estimates on vehicles.

So when I have claims where the vehicle is damaged I send him instead of the company I currently send out.

Next is tractor-trailers!

Oh and slave labor using my daughter to do office work..

Murphy

Null--

When Von Mises was here and going back and forth with Ray--I believe they referred to Austria and the fair tax concept.

There was a website--

www.vonmises.com

Murphy

Null-

You are right--the von mises thing is on the gold standard concept.

They had other articles though--it's been a while.

Murphy

You are all surface scratchers that think you have an impact.

But the truth is, you are bugs in the compost heap, unable to understand the deeper meaning.

This place is on borrowed time, enjoy it while it is pain free.

The clock is ticking.

Danni
Spud
Nullifidian
Truthhurts
ManyPaths
Moder8
Herm
Hans
Yomama
Moneywar
Zatoichi
Redneckville
SilverIronist
Yav
Zot

MORE---
Betelg
Boyd
Cooper
Ray
Denise
Lisa
Trees
Rev Darko
AU

More?

Rcade
Gal Tuesday
Larry Mohr
Lil Brit Different
Corky
Roy Batty
Reagan 58
Left Coast Lawyer

I think the reason that a lot of RT assclowns think this is a conservative site is the fact that they dont, "think" that is.

Look at RideOn's post's fer an example.

Okay, you can look away now, don't want ya to get brain damage.

The average liberal poster around here puts more thought into one of their posts than Wide-On does in a weeks worth of throw-away garbage posts.

"The empty can always most the most noise"

"A Tale told by a madman filled with sound and fury
...signifying nothing"

The reasoned postage of those on the left or those who at least lean left in most important respects far surpasses the entire assemblage of RT posts on a daily basis.

Posts by lefties here at the DR are a good reason to consider adopting a liberal/ progressive political stance.

Posts by the righties around here perversely are also another good reason to consider adopting a liberal/ progressive political stance.

Hell, if Nixon were around to read posts by folks like Ride and WisGoo et al he might seriously considering registering as a Dem after about 5 minutes of their drek!

^_^

Be Well.

Outtie biatches, as ya do,
stage left

Fergot Tony Roma!

All apologies Tony!

Also Sarge who has been traditionally conservative but is coming around to seeing the wisdom of an Obnama Presidency.

Spud'll put him down as an Obamacan Nationalist.

Be Well.

The average liberal poster around here puts more thought into one of their posts than Wide-On does in a weeks worth of throw-away garbage posts.

Thought?

The reasoned postage of those on the left or those who at least lean left in most important respects far surpasses the entire assemblage of RT posts on a daily basis.

Reason?

Posted by dethspud at 2008-04-10 12:12 AM

How dare you accuse us liberals of being led by our minds and not our hearts. We are the touchy-feely end of the political spectrum. We can't afford to try and appeal to our base with such things as logic and reason! Their misshapen and misled brains would explode!

By the way, you're Canadian.

STFU

This is Not a Liberal Site

BWWWWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
H

The sad thing is some of you might not actually think that because it isn't liberal enough!

Not a lib site. LMAO.

Cheers,
Walt

Wingnuts think anyone to the left of Karl Rove is a liberal.

Even conservatives don't like NeoConservatives

Walt

Sorry--you are mistaken again. We counted

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague 57. 2112 58. Member 59. RightoCenter 60. Zatoichi

Many more conservative posters than liberal. Of course this can be checked at anytime under comparable circumstances.

It took Nanc three weeks to find as many liberal posters as I found conservative poster in only five of the threads posting today.

I would say over any given time there are more conservative posters than liberal posters on this site and anyone who disagrees can count them up and prove me mistaken.

Only one righty haunts your sick nightmares ButtfuckBob.

You are mentally ill buddy, the ones that tell you so aren't 'right wingers', they actually care about how sick you are.

And fear for the general population that interacts with you.

Buffalo Bullshit,

Why am I number 49? Certainly I have worked hard enough to piss off you liberal losers. How many handles do I have to go through to get some respect around here?

Certainly my assertions that you and Spudflakes make sweet luff in his canadian trailer have got to earned some points. If not I can ramp up my game and include some rcade bashing for flava.

Sincerely, Crackpipejunkie

anyone who disagrees can count them up and prove me mistaken.

I disagree.

And I aint gonna waste my time counting anything.

If this aint a liberal website, somebody better tell the Pope he aint Catholic.

Just because there may be more normal people on here does not mean it is a normal website. It's like San Francisco, it is a gay city even though there are non-gay people there.

Cheers,
Walt

Walt

Sorry--reality proves you to be mistaken. Of course that never stopped your point of view before.

Facts are--there are many more conservative posters on this site than liberals.

Walt

Sorry--reality proves you to be mistaken. Of course that never stopped your point of view before.

Facts are--there are many more conservative posters on this site than liberals.

Walt

Sorry--reality proves you to be mistaken. Of course that never stopped your point of view before.

Facts are--there are many more conservative posters on this site than liberals.

Well that

still does not

make this a conservative website.

Cheers,
Walt

Walt

I guess it depends on your point of view. Most people would consider the majority of posters on a site would indicte that sites status.

I guess your point is that since a liberal owns the site it must be liberal. That logic would indicate that since all the major media outlets are owned by conservatives the media must be conservative.

I agree.

;-)

BB,

It wouldn't shock me at all if you thought the media was conservative, being as far left as you are.

Do you really think that right leaning posts are the majority of what are made here?

I feel so left out (no pun intended)

Can I get on a list?

Please?

Labels are misleading and some DR posters don't easily fall into the label of liberal or conservative.

I am going to ammend Bbob's list to reflect those individuals AND I won't try and claim them as liberals when I post my own, incomplete list in a moment.

1. Wisgod 2.Rob the A Hole 3.Ride On 4. Rightisright 5. Nanc 6. Farmer John 7. OzarkAggie 8. Grendel 9. Murphy 10. Kris P Bacon 11. Litlebritdifrnt 12. Oohrah 13. Kuma 14. Salamandagator 15 Walt 16. Sniper 17. Joe 18. AndreaMackris 19. Spielmannsfluch 20. Pragmatus 21. Pinche Mao 22. Jeff J 23. Petrous 24. Crispee OC 25. kerrin57 26. Newjasman 27. TakeitEZ 28. Everlong 29. Bushlovertwo 30 Jestgettinalong 31. Pirate 32. Goatman 33. KBM 34. Legio 35. 08R4EVER 36. JonRyker 37. Sickolibs 38. Boaz 39. JoeLabey 40. JMJF 41. HagbardCeline 42. KWRX25 43. SE4NY6969 44. Cookfish 45. 101Chairborne 46. Johnson 47.Crackpipejunkie 48. MSGT 49. Jacque Strap 50. retnluvnit 51. Califchris 52. Armyof1 53. MikeWarrior 54. Moomanfl 55. Ray 56. Jsprague 57. 2112 58. Member 59. RightoCenter 60. Zatoichi


Your con list doesn't include: Tadowe, Liveordie, MrFair and repub4ever.


So we'll add them and subtract the 'unclaimables':

That's plus-4 minus-10, which leaves a net of 54 Conservatives on this site.

Sorry, that's minus-9.

I borrowed Vernon's calculator.....oops. Vern isn't on Bbob's list either.

That means this site has 56 Conservatives.


Here's an incomplete list of site liberals:

1 Rcade 2 twinpac 3 hans 4 alex 5 boyd 6 klifferd 7 odie1kenobie 8 larry 9 sambarber 10 sanantoniorogue 11 taxman 12 danforth 13 redlightrobot 14 bani 15 buffbob 16 spud 17 $war 18 nullifidian 19 axe 20 reagan58 21 berkley 22 dcinma 23 commonsense 24 americanunity 25 briwo 26 manypaths 27 northguy 28 frank55 29 argh 30 townandcountry 31 stupidjerk 32 roma 33 truthhurts 34 silver ironist 35 sagmain 36 roybatty 37 corky 38 leftcoastlawyer 39 denise 40 vickithebrit 41 revdarko 42 r8rh8r 43 moder8 44 yav 45 danni 46 gz 47 dave 48 midiman 49 kinghthawk 50 726 51 sitdown 52 herm 53 dylanfan 54 theperfectstorm 55 tedbaxter 56 zed 57 redneckvill 58 resnwerks 59 donnerbory 60 rastacyborg 61 apololypto 62 mistakurtz 63 keith204 64 bigjohn1972 65 nutcase 66 ness gadol 67 celisary 68 wtf


So, by my count it's 68 liberals to 56 conservatives.

What about Tosser?

What about Furio?

What about Messiah?

Or is that one covered under Jackass?

What about Larry Mohr?

What about Herm?

What about CalifChris is not a conservative?

He/She aint a conservative.

This is Not a Liberal Site

BWWWWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
H

The sad thing is some of you might not actually think that because it isn't liberal enough!

Not a lib site. LMAO.

Actually this is a liberal site by definition. It embraces the "back and forth" of ideas. No one gets put in the sin bin for voicing a political position.

Leave it to Liberals to create a place where everyone has a voice. Not a stretch you know. Liberals founded the United States after all.

What about Rheinheitsgebot?

What about Redlightrobot

What about AngryDad?

What About Evildave?

What about AllieKat?

BustyAngel?
Mesohorny?

Actually this is a liberal site by definition

And your point is what? You just want to argue with me? Don't worry about me. If you want to say this site is liberal, address it to BB who says otherwise.

Thanks for playing.

Cheers,
Walt

Actually this is a liberal site by definition. It embraces the "back and forth" of ideas. No one gets put in the sin bin for voicing a political position.

Leave it to Liberals to create a place where everyone has a voice.


Rcade, and by association liberals, deserve mega-props for creating a site atmosphere where opposition viewpoints are not only tolerated, but are welcomed.


Liberals founded the United States after all.

You are being awfully loose with the term "Liberal" with that statement.

The "Liberals" who were our founding fathers bear little resemblance to the giant-government hugging "Liberals" of modern day. Fact is, the closest modern-day label that mirrors the liberals who were our founders is "Libertarian".


Do you think for a moment that Thomas Jefferson would embrace the massive growth of government that is championed by modern-day "Liberals"?


I thought not.

Considering the senority number on the DR is over 700, may I suggest a few posters are missing from both lists?

Add to my list:

69 furio 70 tosser 71 messiah 72 angrydad 73 alliekat 74 evildave



To BBob's list add

57 Acitizen

I will say this:


Over the course of the 4 years that I've been visiting this site the proportion of liberals to conservatives has narrowed - the site has become closer to centrist in terms of the leanings of its members.

69: Karen561 (even though I don"t post much, I couldn't pass up being this number)