Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, March 03, 2008

An Islamist-held town in southern Somalia has been hit by three missiles, fired by a US plane, local elders say. A US official confirmed launching a strike against "suspected terrorists". Six people were killed in the air strikes on Dhoble town and 20 wounded. The US bombed the area a year ago and residents say it was the same plane.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Walt

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

There have been reports that the Islamists have been regrouping in the area around Dhoble in recent weeks.

They were ousted from the capital, Mogadishu in December 2006 by government forces, backed up by Ethiopia, with some intelligence from the US.

Dhoble was the last town they held.

The US has an anti-terror task force based in nearby Djibouti.


Better bomb em now before Oblahma gets in there. The only thing we will dropping is food aid. They will have at least 4 years to regroup.

Cheers,
Walt

bush has the authority to randomly drop bombs on other nations how?

what clause is that in the damned piece of paper?

Truthhurts -
The Bush Doctrine, as embraced by Bush, gives Bush the right to bomb anyone, anywhere that Bush thinks necessary.

TH, get a grip. Look at the mission, it aint secret. Let the hate go, it consumes you.

Cheers,
Walt

So much for only bombing brown people eh libs?

welcome back 101. Glad to see you didn't change your name.

Salut!

This must be great, Corky can use both thread names and bash Obama with the appearance of two people.

Yeah baby!!

"bush has the authority to randomly drop bombs on other nations how?

what clause is that in the damned piece of paper?"


I don't know....maybe you could ask Clinton if it was the same clause HE used when he bombed the aspirin factory in the Sudan.

ooooh right wing math

wrong + wrong = Right.

got it

By the way, what retard thinks these bombs were dropped randomly? Didn't you see "Islamisist held town" in the story?

Nothing random about it stupid.

They should have ringed the town with cluster bombs and starved them all out.

-Yeah baby!!


Paranoia is a serious problem, Money. Or is it just something you are smoking?

"ooooh right wing math

wrong + wrong = Right.

got it"


No, you don't "got it." It goes like this:

Democrat does it = cool!

Republican does it = despicable!


I can give you many examples of a double standard if you like.


I'm waiting to hear that we killed the 6 #1 guys in Al-Qaeda.

I'm waiting to hear that we killed the 6 #1 guys in Al-Qaeda.

Posted by midiman


How about 6 #3 guys?

Seems like you missed the news midiman.

Didn't you see "Islamisist held town" in the story?


ok, thanks for the clarification, Islamisist held town justifies dropping bombs on another country, one that we are not at war with, got ya.

when are we dropping bombs on

Mecca
cairo
Amman
etc
etc
etc

bush has the authority to randomly drop bombs on other nations how?

what clause is that in the damned piece of paper?

Posted by truthhurts

BJ Billie did it and no one complained. Seems to me he bombed an asprin factory one day to cover his ass from another BJ story. You guys have really short memories.

ok, thanks for the clarification, Islamisist held town justifies dropping bombs on another country, one that we are not at war with, got ya.


Posted by truthhurts at 2008-03-03 11:01 AM | Reply |


"Justified" wasn't in the conversation stupid, "random" was. I corrected your stupidity, so move on.

JeffJ who was the poster you were running with for 08. Brain Surgery and Brain radiation fucks up short term Memory, but at least I remember half the ticket.





I'm waiting to hear that we killed the 6 #1 guys in Al-Qaeda.

Posted by midiman

How about 6 #3 guys?

Posted by JeffJ


I thought we killed most of their #3's. Hard to keep track, and they are SO annoying by insisting on making new top leaders all the time.

If they had good intelligence I have no problem with this attack, it is far preferable to invading and occupying a country that didn't have terrorists in it til we got there...oh sorry, I forgot....the new rule is we can't look back to the mistakes of the past, only forward.....

You keep making the point Danni, Al Q was everywhere except Iraq. Yeah that makes sense.

Rack Bush....For once.


The reality of the situation is that Bush just sped up the inevitable process of their death. In a few years they would have been dead from AIDS or starvation anyway so is it really a big deal?

Also, one needs to look at the bigger picture and understand they were Africans...a subspieces of humans. I think it's pretty evident to the normal person that the world is now less six worthless parasites and now a slighly better place to live.

I thought we killed most of their #3's. Hard to keep track, and they are SO annoying by insisting on making new top leaders all the time.

Bush plays Stratego alot and gets mad when he hits a bomb with one of his generals.

hey its ebenezer scrooge! clear out some of the excess population

Walt:They will have at least 4 years to regroup.

They've had the last 7. You'd think they'd be all regrouped by now.

Oh right, the CIA says they are. Not only in Somolia (the bombing does give bin laden, if you remember him) his "America at war" in trifecta of Somolia, Iraq and afghanistan but in pakistan and afghanistan.

"Six years after the Bush administration declared war on al-Qaeda, the terrorist network is gaining strength and has established a safe haven in remote tribal areas of western Pakistan for training and planning attacks, according to a new Bush administration intelligence report to be discussed today at a White House meeting.

The report, a five-page threat assessment compiled by the National Counterterrorism Center, is titled "Al-Qaida Better Positioned to Strike the West," intelligence officials said. It concludes that the group has significantly rebuilt itself despite concerted U.S. attempts to smash the network."

July 2007. Mission Accomplished

That may be NORTHGUY3 but we are safe from Saddam and his WMDs.

"bush has the authority to randomly drop bombs on other nations how?


The Lord God, who is a Republican, has granted authority from His throne in Heaven above.

Amen.

But surely if we have learned nothing else from the rightwingtards is that the president only bombs terrorists if he wants to distract from some sort of domestic scandal.

"But surely if we have learned nothing else from the rightwingtards is that the president only bombs terrorists if he wants to distract from some sort of domestic scandal."

It is nice that he is helping turn attention away from the fact that we have a suicide bomber running for president.

That may be NORTHGUY3 but we are safe from Saddam and his WMDs.



What? You mean the US forces "took out" the giant rubber band and rock they found in a cave outside of Bagdad?

It is nice that he is helping turn attention away from the fact that we have a suicide bomber running for president

I had no idea McCaint was fitted for a "vest" while in the Bagdad markets.

"What? You mean the US forces "took out" the giant rubber band and rock they found in a cave outside of Bagdad?"

All that safety and it will probably only cost THREE TRILLION DOLLARS.

Gosh, the pro-terrorist lefties, who would provide these terrorists with sanctuaries, claim that the bombs are "randomly" dropped. What acid do you guys drop now?

This was targeted. There was a target. The practice of the Islamics of positioning their killers among non-combatants does not convert those lairs to safe havens. The ilsamics are responsible for the harm done to non-combatants, whom they attempt to use as human shields.

Since they themselves have no compunctions regarding killing non-combatants, and in fact deliberately target non-combatants, they should not be exercised by the collateral damage inflicted.

The tactics of the Islamics compel such a response, and the Islamics themselves are responsible for the ensuing civilian casualties.

There has been a salutary result, terrorists killed, so that they cannokt go out to kill again.

Don't you lefties have any sense of affiliation with your own? Why do you align yourselves with vicious terrorist killers? Are you so anti-American, anti-Western, anti-civilization, that you derive vicarious satisfaction observing Islamic killers operate? Do you want terrorist killers free to kill again? What's with you guys?

TinyJohnson chimes in with his Zionazi rant!!! Hey tiny, your strawman is showing!!!

What the F are you talking about when you say lefties support muslims or terrorists? Can you provide ANY PROOF that any poster here ever supported one? Sure there are people on DR with a few funtioning brain cells that don't have the lips attached to GZ's ass, but that dosn't imply that they support anything.

Go back to worshiping you little GZ doll and wanking off. Leave the debate to folks with more smarts than you or me.

Posted by danni at 2008-03-03 12:42 PM

"What? You mean the US forces "took out" the giant rubber band and rock they found in a cave outside of Bagdad?"


Is this your perception, Danni? God help you. You're probably overpaying your shrink.

All that safety and it will probably only cost THREE TRILLION DOLLARS.


Oh? Have you converted to being against Islamic terrorism, Danni? Is it now just a matter of efficiency, more kills per dollar that troubles you?

If that's it, I'm glad that you've seen the light.

Let's more efficiently destroy Islamic terrorists.

Posted by northguy3 at 2008-03-03 11:37 AM

"Six years after the Bush administration declared war on al-Qaeda, the terrorist network is gaining strength and has established a safe haven in remote tribal areas of western Pakistan for training and planning attacks, according to a new Bush administration intelligence report to be discussed today at a White House meeting.

The report, a five-page threat assessment compiled by the National Counterterrorism Center, is titled "Al-Qaida Better Positioned to Strike the West," intelligence officials said. It concludes that the group has significantly rebuilt itself despite concerted U.S. attempts to smash the network."


Okay, the terrorists are stronger despite our efforts to interdict their activities.

Now that great minds such as yours are addressing the problem, possibly you can devise strategy and tactics to enable us to be more successful in our efforts.

Or is it implicit in your statement that since they are bettering their situation anyway, we should just concede and enable them to subjugate us without resistance, which just prolongs the struggle before their inevitable triumph?

How do we win this conflict against an enemy hell-bent on destroying us and Western civilization? Come on Northguy3, share your insights.

Or are you an Islamic sympathizer, who is complicit in seeking destruction of Western civilization and imposition of sharia law on the West. It isn't an enlightened culture, but its warriors in the jihad are laciviously contemplating a sexual orgy in the hereafter and are motivated. I suppose that there is even a cure for impotence for these jihadis once they enter the realm of Paradise. There's medicine and then there's Paradise.

So? How about it Northguy3. How do we beat these guys?

Posted by axe at 2008-03-03 01:18 PM

What the F are you talking about when you say lefties support muslims or terrorists? Can you provide ANY PROOF that any poster here ever supported one? Sure there are people on DR with a few funtioning brain cells that don't have the lips attached to GZ's ass, but that dosn't imply that they support anything.

Gosh, you leftist folks sure take umbrage when note is made of your positions. You describe America's efforts with ridicule, obloquy, and contempt, deriding America's efforts to subdue terrorists as unsuccessful, and intimating your disapporoval of our efforts. What's "proof" to you. Isn't "confession" of being renegades with terrorist sympathies sufficient?

The "proof" is the statements that you lefties have made here.
Go back to worshiping you little GZ doll and wanking off. Leave the debate to folks with more smarts than you or me.

Based on this statement it is apparent that you are another lefty with psychosexual fantasies. The degree of insertion of such ideation in posts by lefties certainly is a basis for study of the disorder that manifests itself in leftist's statements of their views.

There seem to be authority figure problems, and a focus on sexual matters that reflects the troubles of lefties. Leftyism and its renegade aspects are surely mental disorders. Find a therapist someplace, Axe, who can explain your fantasies to you, and determine why they manifest themselves in alienation from your country, and in opposing American interests.

Shucks Axe, in the face of jihadist aggressiveness, I recognize that the interests of the West (and civilized Eastern countries) consist of repelling and destroying the religiously impelled drive for conquest by Islam trying to subjugate the world and impose sharia. We have many problems and peoples opposed to us, but the Islamic belligernece to every other group only makes survival in a world fraught with peril, more difficult.

But as you post as a renegade with sexual fantasies you seem to have even more problems than people not so afflicted. Courage. Try for the cure.

Your Fox inspired pop-psycho-babble dosn't impress, tiny. You are forever linked to your fat friend GZ and in the minds of most DR regulars, you are an instant SkipOver poster. Your Zionist ravings are second only to GZ for their bullshit factor.

Too bad. You may have some interesting things to say on other topics, but few will be reading them.

"Based on this statement it is apparent that you are another lefty with psychosexual fantasies. The degree of insertion of such ideation in posts by lefties certainly is a basis for study of the disorder that manifests itself in leftist's statements of their views."

Wow. What an idiot. Just when you thought the lunatic Right couldn't get any more stupid, along comes Johnson.

The "right to bomb" other people has long been a "right" held by the American President. It is a right conferred by the power to do the act. It's a custom and usage thing.

The continuing precedent was set by Clinton. Why was there no objection by the left when Clinton bombed Yugoslavia? Yugoslavia was badly damaged. All of he bridges crossing the Danube there were destroyed. The civilian population was decimated. There were few if any picures of the devastation in the media, and no news reports delineating the suffering of the civilian Serb population, which was targeted unmercifully.

Well, there was no protest from the left because ... Well why, lefties? Why? Now it seems that the left protests such bombings because the lefties are terrorist sympathizers, and anti-American to boot. Actions against terrorists are actions against their adopted cause.

Why do you folks love terrorists and terrorism, and oppose efforts to attack terrorists, whom you would have roam the globe with impunity, attacking targets without any attempts at interdiction? Why do you favor that we limit our actions if they would harm the terrorist cause? Do some self-searching and try to figure out why you are so alienated. Did you have problems with your father? What?

What accounts for your masochism, alienation from and rejection of your own society, and your mental illness. I recognize that you don't currently have insights into your dysfunction, and so cannot answer. The question is rhetorical.

Posted by axe at 2008-03-03 01:58 PM

Too bad. You may have some interesting things to say on other topics, but few will be reading them.

That's okay, Axe. Closed minds need to avoid information that might upset their world view. They are structured in their attempts to be able to function. It's unlikely that you could process such information anyway as it might not fit in with your preconceptions, so it's just as well.

Take care, Axe. Agape.

By the way, this attack was not made by "Zionists." It's an American attack on terrorists. But the response by the lefties is consistent. They deplore attacks on terrorists whatever the origin of the attacks. It's not only Israelis who should not defend themselves. Neither should anyone else. They even attack their own country, America, for acting against terrorists.

What America needs is more jingoists and chauvinists, whose preference is support for their own country, and its actions.

What accounts for your masochism, alienation from and rejection of your own society, and your mental illness.

Posted by Johnson at 2008-03-03 01:59 PM | Reply


Penis envy. Both, liberal metrosexual and radical feminazis have it.

It can be extrapolated that it's contagious and is primarily acquired by those (who through no fault of their own) forced to endure exposure to liberal public education, the absence of a father figure and mother whose preferences lie mostly with inanimate objects and periodically changing life partners.

Your Fox inspired pop-psycho-babble dosn't impress, tiny. You are forever linked to your fat friend GZ and in the minds of most DR regulars, you are an instant SkipOver poster. Your Zionist ravings are second only to GZ for their bullshit factor.

Posted by axe

Damn good arguement there axe. There isn't anyone that can argue with your facts.

Why didn't you just call him a stupid ass? All you do is babble.

I notice you guys just continue posting whether anyone considers you comments important enough to bother responding or not. Johnson's comments are hollow accusations that don't even reflect the posts on the thread to any extent. Most people don't have any problem with attacks on terrorists, just like we didn't when the same things were done by Clinton. Obama has even said he would do the same thing in Pakistan while many of the righties here gasped that it would be too confrontational to the Pakistianis....until Bush went ahead and did exactly what Obama recommended.
I sense a feeling of defeat coming from the righties and now they have nothing left but name calling and ridiculous comments like:
"Penis envy. Both, liberal metrosexual and radical feminazis have it."

When that is the best you got your argument is lost.

"So? How about it Northguy3. How do we beat these guys?"

The first thing to do is quit making more of them.

Dumbass.

FF for Mista

Hey Snippy,

At least people don't fall asleep trying to read 87 paragraphs of BS when I babble.

And I defy you to find a single fact in my posts. I provide only 100% Grade A OPINION.

when you kill a # 3 guy, someone takes his place (probably the #4 guy).

Monster,

It goes farther than that. When you kill someone's kids, cousins or parents, regardless of the reason, by accident or on purpose, it tends to make them hate you. Familys are large, so killing a few here and the few there tends to create a lot more people that hate you than those you killed.

"""Let's more efficiently destroy Islamic terrorists. """

Good of you to qualify terrorists with islamic, otherwise a whack of people, including boy dunder would fall within the category.


I notice you guys just continue posting whether anyone considers you comments important enough to bother responding or not. Johnson's comments are hollow accusations that don't even reflect the posts on the thread to any extent. Most people don't have any problem with attacks on terrorists, just like we didn't when the same things were done by Clinton. Obama has even said he would do the same thing in Pakistan while many of the righties here gasped that it would be too confrontational to the Pakistianis....until Bush went ahead and did exactly what Obama recommended.
I sense a feeling of defeat coming from the righties and now they have nothing left but name calling and ridiculous comments like:
"Penis envy. Both, liberal metrosexual and radical feminazis have it."

When that is the best you got your argument is lost.

Posted by danni at 2008-03-03 02:24 PM | Reply |


Its always been clear to me posters around here fall into one of 3 categories.

Those who post who have no interest in being wrong, only being right. "self rightous"

Those who post who have no interest in anything but creating "buzz" over they're post. "trolling"

Those who post to debate others over daily topics. "the boring people"

There is an odd 4th group who only seem to post as a means of maintaining external friendships... "see lunatics".

Knighthawk,


You forgot the 5th group:

Those who post as a means of outwardly proecting homosexuality. "the Knighthawks"


*just messing with ya, Bro.

Danni;

Simon (obama) says.. drop to your knees.

Bombing Islamists will be fashionable again, approximately two seconds after President Barack Obama is sworn in as president. You'll see the stickers come off the Volvo's, and the silly "Bush Lied! People Died!" t-shirts will be thrown away. Suddenly, liberals will find that military power used to kill jihadists is sexy after all. No more Pink Power rallies outside of Berkeley Marine offices, no more questioning the Constitutional authority of a president who launches missiles at enemy targets without running down to a joint session of Congress first. In fact, even the wiretaps and Gitmo will be fun; not a whole lot of liberal outrage when Hillary et al put a bouncer in charge of the FBI files--why should they get upset about President Obama being able to read their emails?

Gonna be a fun four years, assuming we don't all get whiplash from the hypocrisy.

Why does this website only have discussion of negative articles about America and its people? It's unfriggin' believable!

Here's one for the anti-American left:
"United States Is Largest Donor of Foreign Aid"
www.america.gov

"American Generosity is Underappreciated"
www.heritage.org

after many months of complainin bout bush's inactivity
on the african front he finnaly does somethin of course in will never approval from the same people who been complainin --notice how little press he got for his mostly well recieved(by africans)trip to africa,and his plans to fight desease in africa(he has spent more cash there then any other president
jasman

The terrorist factory is in full production. At least America is still good at doing something.

More Al Qaeda B.S.from the US Military:

US Military Attacks al Qaeda in Somalia! - Oh Really?
This headline is just a "Euphemism" for the real headline which should read:"Bush Regime (a.k.a. Corporate America) Invades Somalia in Preparation for Seizing that Country,for its Resources and/or its Strategic Importance - Hey Wave that Sanctifying ol'Flag - Its a Done Deal Folks"

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable