She won 57 percent of women and 6o-something percent of Latinos, bringing home the groups that cost us the last two elections.

Hillary/Bush dynasty continues.

Yeah! Whoo Hoo!

Happy days are here again!

The thin veil covering the almost indistinguishable difference between the two major parties has all but disappeared. The good Congressman from Texas named Ron Paul is the only candidate that comes with no strings attached leading to globalist puppeteers. Paul's popular yet simple message of freedom is spreading, while the establishment scrambles to scare up support from ever more skeptical Americans for their increasingly un-popular candidates.

Clinton Wins California

Cli-click

BOOM!

Thud.

Sincerely,

Tony Roma

The media sees this process as some kind of horse race. Using their analogy, I believe that Clinton will run a strong, competent race, keeping her pace, guarding the rail. But someone is coming up fast on the outside and appears to have something extra in the tank for the home stretch.
Obama will win, going away.
Ron Paul has everything going for him; except votes. His main appeal is to those who believe both political parties are the identical, a delusion that, fortunately, is not shared by the majority. People are realizing that lumping both parties together is merely an attempt by the right to suppress the vote.

Igmoramus,


Except for your last sentence:

People are realizing that lumping both parties together is merely an attempt by the right to suppress the vote.


You can disregard my last crack at your handle.

bringing home the groups that cost us the last two elections.

Cost us??? Who is us?

Women cost us every election because they won't vote and now they come out not for purpose of good government but because a "WOMEN" is running.

Well, sorry but I would rather those women not vote at all, they clearly show why they are not respected in real life.

I'm surprised at how well obama is doing, but Clinton taking Mass, New York and California I think is too big for her not to win it now. Those are the Democratic states...

I WONDER WHY DO PEOPLE VOTE FOR OBAMA. ALL THE GUY DOING IS SAY CHANGE ,CHANGE, CHANGE...HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE RUNNING THE GORVERMENT AT ALL{LOCAL, STATE, FEDRAL}.THE CLINTONS IS DIFFERENT. THEY RAN THE COUNTRY BEFORE AND WE HAD A GOOD TIME..

Clinton won alot of delegates from 4 states that are guaranteed to go Democrat anyway.

CA, NY, MA and NJ primaries mean nothing as these voting populations would pull the lever for Hitler if you put a 'D' after his name. The DNC doesn't need to consider their preference at all when choosing a candidate as their electoral votes are pre-pledged to the party anyway. As a resident of NJ, it pains me to say it but populations who blindly vote for one party without fail don't deserve such consideration. It is the states that are up for grabs that matter as long as the electoral college system is in place.

(Before anyone flips out, this is just my opinion and I'm not saying the DNC ignores those primaries. They are not smart enough to figure out that they don't have to worry about states that are guaranteed and that is why Bush is a two-termer)

"HE HAS NO EXPERIENCE RUNNING THE GORVERMENT AT ALL{LOCAL, STATE, FEDRAL}."

He has more experience as an elected official than Hillary. And to me, that isn't even a selling point.

But I like the caps. If you are going to talk out your ass, you should do it loudly.

For Badophay -

Obama - Wants dialog with enemies. Has said so, even if it's not "populist". We're the muddaflippin US of A. Who are we afraid to talk to? Barack before bombs.

Obama - Not the wife of the guy whose crippling sanctions and annual bombing runs entrenched Sadaam's Baathists and killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, mostly women and children. Not saying the sanctions were right or wrong, but Obama is a new honest broker for a hurting Iraq.

Obama - Willing to take steps toward getting over it with Cuba. A fresh face for bringing a post-Fidel Cuba to the 21st century without it going nuts.

Obama - Supports "decriminalization" of marijuana and states' rights in the area. That's a seven-syllable word that says he knows what the hell he's talking about. I've never toked, really, but think the war on drugs sucks.

Obama - Hasn't thrown gays under the bus time and time again. Bill Clinton... gleefully signing the DOMA in the Rose Garden on September 1996 during the election campaign? Don't think that one's forgotten!

Hillary Clinton - Proud to be chief sponsor for a dumb-as-rocks anti-flag-burning bill. Obama - Constitutional scholar who has fought many First Amendment cases on the side of freedom.

Obama's not an empty suit.

He has more experience as an elected official than Hillary.....

Posted by Sully at 2008-02-06 11:38 AM | Reply

I was thinking last night that when I was a little kid my mom would give me a nickel to scrub the bathroom sink.

I went on to earn money by painting drawers, sweeping the garage, picking up sticks in the yard. I had a lemonade stand a few times, and started cutting grass for neighbors whe I was 9. I had a paper route, and was a busboy at age 14.

Hey! I have 35 years' experience too! Most of it in the private sector, with five years in the military (government) service.

I'm as qualified to be president as Hillary!

" THE CLINTONS IS DIFFERENT. THEY RAN THE COUNTRY BEFORE AND WE HAD A GOOD TIME.."

Yes as said before your talking out of your ass! Please remove the toilet papper before you speak!
The clintons did not run the country! Bill was the president, Hillary was not in any way shape or form part of the policrical process. She was a wife of the president, nothing more!

And as far as expereince, The longer a person is a plotician the better they are at lying too you! This is the reason this country has gone to hell. We keep putting the same lying bastards in office over and over again and look where we are now. More tax's than ever before and still you will vote for the same ole same!

Obama is a fresh face in Washinton! New ideals and less currupt that the rest of the clowns running.

Now if you could see me.... I'm crying.... booo hooo.... Now go vote for me stupid!!!

Obama and Clinton would best heed the results of their Hollywood debate and conduct the rest of the campaign in a civil matter, focusing on the fact that the republicans are on the eve of electing a Manchurian candidate who is not mentally competent to be president.

I am a Democrat, and we are fortunate to have two great candidates fighting for the nomination. Having said that if anyone was watching MSNBC last everning from 8pm thru 11pm (PST) they woulde have gone to sleep thinking that Sen. Clinton had suffered a great defeat.

Chris Matthews (HILLARY HATER), fawned over every Delegate that Sen. Obama won, while explaining away every Delegate that Sen Clintopn recieved. For the past 6 Months MSBNC have been the cheerleader for the Obama campaign, I never taught I would say this considering there history but if any one wants a Fair an Balanced view of this election catch FOX NEWS once in a while!!!

Celisary

I posted these last night...

"MSNBC is like a morgue. All the Obamites look like zombies. The ones on CNN, too. Their normally invisible Obama buttons are actually beginning to show.....

If I had an excuse-making machine..... I could make a fortune selling to them!"


"NY NJ MA

What I find funny switching around channels is that Faux News, with no real dog in the Dem race, projected all those states for Clinton WAY before MicrosoftNBC and CNN finally managed to make themselves do so.

They are SO disappointed!

After all that hard work they did not vetting Obama and hyping him incessantly to make the ratings horse race cash register ring for as long as possible, and now they have to count votes when pontificating on polls is SO much more fun!

Clinton/Obama '08!
"16 Years is Better than 8" (TM)

Posted by Corky at 2008-02-05 09:55 PM | Reply

Yes, they're BOTH eminently qualified, miles about anything the Nixon-Reagan-Bush party has to offer. And yes, they're both wimpy centrists, but that may be the best progressives will EVER get.

I see the momentum with Barack, but it may be too late. I see Hillary as already the darling of the corporate board rooms, the Murdochs and those who understand that the N-R-B party has irretrievably pissed it away.

Let's hope that they don't destroy each other. Wouldn't having them on the same ticket be great. herm

"Clinton/Obama '08! "16 Years is Better than 8" (TM)"" - Corky

Not gonna happen. Gore and Obama have talked about what that would be like.

You mean Obama would dis his Nation and his Party, not to mention the opportunity to become Pres, all because he might become like the best VP we ever had?

HRC Will be gentle and kind to him, don't worry.

I doubt very seriously that Obama would ever agree to run as VP. Would Hillary Clinton?

From your link, Bill:

I worry, however, that some Obama supporters have become so emotionally invested in him that they would not support Clinton if she eventually prevails.

I think this is true, and I am pretty sure that Hillary will not get many of their votes. Thankfully, like Corky has inferred, she won't need them because of the female and hispanic vote.

She won 57 percent of women and 6o-something percent of Latinos, bringing home the groups that cost us the last two elections.

It's not women or Hispanics that make the difference.

But, since you mention it, in New Mexico, with 38% Hispanic vote - by far the largest percentage of Hispanic voters in any state, Obama may very well win. Right now they're 60 votes apart counting 'provisional' ballots.

In California, Obama closed the former 62-19% gap among Hispanics to a 60-40% split. Another week and he most likely would have won California and New Jersey. He got 40% in Hillary's own state.

Obama did better with INDEPENDENTS - the group that decides presidential elections these days - by 25%, and Republican voters who crossed over by a mile.

He's also the one who just may win a Red state or two.

McCain vs Dem (?) comes down to Independents. Obama wins there by a mile.

HRC Will be gentle and kind to him, don't worry.

Posted by Corky at 2008-02-06 01:39 PM | Reply

And Hillary! will protect you, too

--Corky

"You mean Obama would dis his Nation and his Party, not to mention the opportunity to become Pres, all because he might become like the best VP we ever had?

HRC Will be gentle and kind to him, don't worry."

First of all, Hillary's VP wouldn't even be second fiddle.... he/she would be third after Hillary and Bill. Playing third fiddle to Bill and Hillary didn't do much for Gore's political ambitions. Bill is already way too involved in Hillary's campaign and there is no reason to believe he'd back off after she wins.

Secondly, there's a real chance that he believes some of the stuff he says about Hillary being the same old type of politician that has been messing things up for years. Whether or not you think its true or hypocritical or whatever - he may believe it. So why would he want to work for a person he doesn't believe in when he could keep his job in the senate and still be a leading candidate next time around? It isn't "dissing" the nation to refuse to be part of an administration you don't believe in and who is going to marginalize you anyway. As far as "dissing" his party, I wish more politicians would grow some balls and show some individuality. Licking Bush's boots for eight years has destroyed much of McCain's appeal to anyone who isn't a GOP drone.

I have two words: super delegates

Obama is going to need a lot more than a six delegate lead at the end of the road in order to overcome the number of super delegates already committed to Hillary's side.

AU

Just now saw your post! Where've you been?
Haven't seen you around here for a few days so I was hoping all was okay.

Dick Morris is now on talk radio show and said that maybe a new primary is needed because Edwards' and Obama's names' weren't even on the primary ticket in Michigan like they should have been, and that Hillary did not stay out of campaigning in Florida like she had promised to do.

Hillary vs McCain is likely to occur. Who is the better choice? Two corporate globalists who will flood the country with illegals.


It pains me to say this but I prefer McCain

Time for a third party candidate to emerge --

Before it's too late --

LOU DOBBS FOR PRESIDENT 2008!

"She won 57 percent of women and 6o-something percent of Latinos, bringing home the groups that cost us the last two elections."

If someone is voting in a Demcoratic primary, it is highly unlikely that this person cost you the last election. Yes, I know "independents' can vote in some states but real independents don't vote in party primaries. Primaries basically measure who people who are going to blindly vote for you party anyway would prefer. They in no way measure how a candidate will actually perform in a real election. In many ways, the primary system encourages a party to nominate a party hack rather than someone with broader appeal.

I'm as qualified to be president as Hillary!

Posted by vernon at 2008-02-06 11:59 AM | Reply | Flag:

You looked the other way when your husband cheated ?

I knew it...