Penn Rhodeen was no doubt crying because of years of childhood beatings from classmates for being named "Penn Rhodeen."

Hillary had other reasons for crying.

Isn't there a primary tomorrow somewhere?

"Look, Daddy, teacher says every time Hillary cries, Ronnie James Dio slays an angel."

Just cry every time people are about to vote and the liberals will come out in droves. They care more about feelings than actual ideas.

Just cry every time people are about to vote and the liberals will come out in droves. They care more about feelings than actual ideas.
Posted by JOE at 2008-02-04 01:50 PM


YEAH!

So tell us Joe ---- what was the past twelve years of WingDing Rule?

Ideas or Feelings?

And I seem to remember a little document being sold, one that many Americans at the time embraced --- it was called "A Contract with America".

Was that document Ideas or Feelings?

Just cry every time people are about to vote and the liberals will come out in droves. They care more about feelings than actual ideas.

Posted by JOE



Grow the F up. How anybody who supports the laughable policies of the right can say such a thing simply reinforces the idea that the right wing is a hopeless, adolescent joke.

ALL of the candiates are human beings, and ALL of them have real feelings. And yes, EMPATHY is a real emotion, and if it is unique to liberals, then that's just further testimony to how pathetic your side really is.

ALL of the candiates are human beings, and ALL of them have real feelings. And yes, EMPATHY is a real emotion, and if it is unique to liberals, then that's just further testimony to how pathetic your side really is.

The difference between conservatives and liberals is that conservatives show their empathy/ compassion through positive legislative and executive action and liberals show their's through artful and timely displays of forced crocodile tears.

ALL of the candiates are human beings, and ALL of them have real feelings. And yes, EMPATHY is a real emotion, and if it is unique to liberals, then that's just further testimony to how pathetic your side really is.

Posted by midiman at 2008-02-04 02:04 PM

With Hillary this, crying bit, seems to be a very convienent tool.

Yet she will be licking her lips and salivating when she nukes Iran.
That's PMS for you.

sickoflibs?

Speaking of very convenient tools......

"The difference between conservatives and liberals is that conservatives show their empathy/ compassion through positive legislative and executive action....

Posted by Farmer_John at 2008-02-04 02:23 PM"

That is one of the unintentionally funniest, most deluded statements posted in the history of the DR.

ALL of the candiates are human beings, and ALL of them have real feelings. And yes, EMPATHY is a real emotion, and if it is unique to liberals, then that's just further testimony to how pathetic your side really is.

Posted by midiman at 2008-02-04 02:04 PM

Yep, just like when Brown died in a plane crash and Bill was caught on camera yucking it up and laughing until the cameras hit him and he want into his EMPATHY mode..........sheesh you are not so smart MIDIMAN.

The Clinton's are simply showing their true colors....you simply need to remove the rose colored glasses to see them.

""The difference between conservatives and liberals is that conservatives show their empathy/ compassion through positive legislative and executive action....""

Like tax cuts for the rich.
Compassionate Conservative means kindness to rich folks.

BTW, how is Terry Schiavo these days?

Here we are Men, this is our fault! We should never have given women the right to vote, let alone run for office. We have nobody to blame but ourselves. Women are emotional creatures, and incapable of making sound political decisions.

As was expected, the whiny liberals immediately attacked me as someone who "supports the policies of the right." I merely criticized liberals. That has nothing to do with who I support, and I certainly never vote for Republicans. Instead responding to the criticism or proving me wrong, we get a bunch of incorrect accusations and assumptions. Par for the drudge course.

Like tax cuts for the rich.

Every taxcut for Bill Gates ends up as either a job a MicroSoft employee's, an education for some minority kid and/or medical treatment for some African kids mother.

A tax cut for a welfare queen ends up as another three zero's added to the national debt.

A tax cut for a "welfare queen" ends up in the till of some local small business person, Farmer.

A tax cut for a "welfare queen" ends up in the till of some local small business person, Farmer.

LOL! You mean an IOU to some Chinese bondholder that comes due in 30 years w/interest.

No, I mean U.S. currency filling the till, allowing the business owner to hire another clerk, or buy more inventory, or expand into other areas.

The IOU's are caused by "fiscally conservative" Republicans spending like drunken sailors, and Democrats trying to keep up with the "conservatives" across the aisle.

No, I mean U.S. currency filling the till, allowing the business owner to hire another clerk, or buy more inventory, or expand into other areas.... along with a correspnding IOU to some Chinese billionaire.

And why should some "other" US businessman profit from your extortion of money from Bill Gates? Let Gate's himself benefit and spend his surplus billions as HE sees fit. At least that way, there's no IOU going to some nameless Chinese investor.

Coulter: Hillary is "Our Girl"

Kurt Nimmo
Truth News
February 2, 2008

Case closed. You don't need any more evidence there is little substantive difference between "conservatives" (neocons) and "liberals" (neolibs) than the pronouncements of the Queen of Hateful Shrill, Ann Coulter, the "author" who registers to vote in multiple jurisdictions and gets away with it.

Hillary is "more conservative" than John McCain, the Manchurian candidate who hates "gooks," mostly because the Bilderberg Queen and selectee of preference by the Rothschilds and the elite is more on track with the neocon and neoliberal plan to kill recalcitrant Muslims, break their countries into manageable pieces along tribal and ethnic lines, and impose IMF and World Bank schemes on them and thus steal their natural resources and reduce them to slave labor gulag inmates la "communist" China.

Coulter "absolutely" believes Queen Hillary will be "stronger on the war on terrorism," that is to say not only killing people who have the misfortune of living in "rogue nations," but decimating what remains of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Obviously, for Coulter and the neocons, who will soon enough throw their support behind Clinton, McCain's crude forever war pronouncements are not enough. But then, of course, McCain is but window dressing for the stampede to "elect" Hillary, an expensive circus sideshow designed to make the American people think there is a "democratic" process in the United States and that they actually have a say in who will be the next decider-commander. Not explained is why the elite feel compelled to continue this transparent charade. Nostalgia, maybe?

The US government is broke. It doesn't have ANY money. And it should only spend what money we GIVE it. And personally, I don't like the way it spends like a drunken sailor supporting all its' useless scum offspring in every port. It's time to get that sailor out of EVERYONE's pocket.

Wait a sec... is kind of drama this how she won all those lawsuits for Wal-Mart in the 80s? For the logging companies against injured workers?

"And why should some "other" US businessman profit from your extortion of money from Bill Gates? Let Gate's himself benefit and spend his surplus billions as HE sees fit.

Posted by Farmer_John at 2008-02-04 02:53 PM"

Like Buffett, Gates doesn't want tax cuts that benefit him, to the deteriment of the country. For some reason, he feels that billions of dollars is enough to get by on. He doesn't need some Farmer John shilling for him - he's a big boy, and probably has a little better contacts in the gov't than you do. He also realizes that he gets a lot of benefits from our society, and thankfully, unlike some of the greedy Republican oilmen, he doesn't mind paying for those benefits.

(this kind of drama)

Like Buffett, Gates doesn't want tax cuts that benefit him, to the deteriment of the country. For some reason, he feels that billions of dollars is enough to get by on. He doesn't need some Farmer John shilling for him - he's a big boy, and probably has a little better contacts in the gov't than you do. He also realizes that he gets a lot of benefits from our society, and thankfully, unlike some of the greedy Republican oilmen, he doesn't mind paying for those benefits.

How do you know that? Because Buffet says so? Why don't you ask Bill Gates if HE thinks we should raise HIS taxes and whether the government can spend Gate's money more effectly than HE can. Buffet confessed himself to being too stupid to give his money away effectively himself, and so maybe he doesn't mind Uncle Sam picking his pocket. In fact, he gave most of his money to Bill to spend for him, and NOT Uncle Sam!

So maybe Bill Gates doesn't need a shill like Buffet talking for him... or else they'd both be writing checks to the feds, and NOT to their own foundations.

Isn't that sweet?

What would she do when they bomb the senate or the house?

Isn't congress in session? Are Clinton, Obama and McCain on vacation?, personal time? or a paid leave of absence? Should they return thier paychecks? If Clinton and Obama's health care plans are so wonderful why do we have to wait until Jan 09 to see them? They're both senators, why don't they co-sponsor a bill and bring it to the floor of the senate now? Aren't the people of Arizona, Illinois and New York being short changed? Thier senator is obviously not doing what they were elected to do. Lets face it, it's they same every four years. Lots of promises but no action. Remember John "I Have a Plan" Kerry? What happened to that plan John? Why didn't you bring it to the floor of the senate? To get change in Washington you have to have change in Washington. They all need to go. It's time to vote against the incumbents and clean out both the house and the senate. We the people can completly change the house in one voting cycle. It will take 3 cycles to change out the senate, but after the house makeover maybe the senate would wake up and take notice. LET'S DO IT NOW before it's to late for our grandchildren.

I notice the trend here.

Anytime the discussion is about a Democrat, the conservatives poke fun at the Democrat and liberals bash republicans.

If the conversation is about a republican, the conservatives have a discussion about the republican and the liberals bash the republicans.

Why is it that liberals won't talk about liberals?

I noticed the same trend only in reverse. anytime a posting is about George Bush some Republican will always bring up the Bill Clinton. The trend you noticed here run's bothways.

Of course she made a tear for the cameras.

It worked last time didn't it?

oops I am a "liberal"

I am not supposed to notice those kind of things?

Buffet and Gates are pals dumdum.

No shit, Sherlock. But you still failed to quote Gate's asking to give himself a tax increase. LOL!

During a speech at the World Economic Forum, an annual gathering of business and political leaders in Davos, Switzerland, the co-founder of Microsoft said unfettered capitalism has primarily raised the living standards of the rich and not done enough to benefit the world's 2.5 billion impoverished people.

Again, since there are 6 billion people in the world, shouldn't unfettered capitalism get credit for raising the living standards of the 3.5 billion people who AREN'T impoverished? Because without it, all 6 billion of us would be living in a shithole.

Osama bin Laden & Al-Qaeda have no idea what they are dealing with. The new United States with Hillary in charge will talk, cry even spread her legs if they mess with us.

I am a salesman, and sometimes I want to cry when I feel a sale slipping away too. I can't remember her crying before this election, maybe I am wrong. I don't think this is fake, I just question why now. Why not over Katrina, or Iraq or Oklamhoma City? Just seems odd.

I think you are all being very insulting to drunken sailors. :D