Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, January 04, 2008

People who complain that Barack Obama lacks experience must be unaware of his legislative achievements. One reason these accomplishments are unfamiliar is that the media have not devoted enough attention to Obama's bills and the effort required to pass them, ignoring impressive, hard evidence of his character and ability.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

tonyroma

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Here's an Edwards attempt to baste Obama on the basis of that experience. But check out the part in boldface:

Edwards Campaign Asserts Obama Once A Sellout To Corporate Interests

Roughly twelve hours after a second-place finish in the Iowa caucus, Sen. John Edwards' campaign went on the attack against the winner, Sen. Barack Obama, asserting that the Illinois Democrat was once a sellout to corporate interests.

In an appearance on MSNBC, David Bonior, Edwards' campaign manager, ripped into Obama's record on health care from the time when he served in the Illinois State Senate.

"Barack Obama's kind of change is where you sit down and you cut a deal with the corporate world," Bonior said. "If you look at his record in Illinois when he had a major -- sponsored a major health bill that's what he did. He watered down with the help of the corporate lobbyist and they got a weak product out of that."

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough interjected: "Are you saying that Barack Obama is a sellout to corporate interests?"

Bonior responded, "He was four years ago in Illinois. All you have to do is look at the legislation I'm referring to."

The Obama campaign was quick to respond, defending their candidate's credentials both on health care policy and his ability to stand up to lobbyists.

"The reason Barack Obama won such a commanding victory in Iowa is because Americans of all parties are hungry for a leader who can bring people together to take on the special interests," said spokesman Ben Labolt in an email to the Huffington Post. "That's how Barack Obama actually took on lobbyists and won in Illinois, and that's how he expanded health care to 150,000 Illinois children and parents."

Bonior's attack reflects somewhat of a strategic shift for the Edwards campaign, which following Thursday night's results in Iowa is pining hard to make the Democratic primary a two-person race with Obama. Over the past few weeks, Edwards himself has saved most of his campaign vitriol for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, criticizing her as the candidate of corporate and entrenched Washington interest. When Edwards did attack Obama on the issue of health care, it tended to be about specific policy differences between their plans.

But with Obama now taking over the mantle of ordained Democratic frontrunner, Edwards' campaign has clearly sharpened its spears. And it is not alone. After coming in third in Iowa, Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign has hinted that it too is going to ramp up a more aggressive, attack-oriented campaign against Obama.

The health care legislation that Bonior singled out has already been a topic of much coverage. The legislation, which Obama helped shepherd through the Illinois State Senate in 2003, helped expand coverage to 70,000 children and 84,000 adults, according to Labolt. It also expanded and made permanent Illinois' KidCare program, raising the eligibility from 185 percent to 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

But as the Boston Globe reported on September 23, 2007, in the process of crafting the legislation, Obama consulted with "insurers and their lobbyists" and amended the bill "more to their liking."

"The wrangling over the healthcare measure, which narrowly passed and became law in 2004, illustrates how Obama, during his eight years in the Illinois Senate, was able to shepherd major legislation by negotiating competing interests in Springfield, the state capital," the Globe reported. "But it also shows how Obama's own experience in lawmaking involved dealings with the kinds of lobbyists and special interests he now demonizes on the campaign trail."

On the campaign trail Edwards has railed against the disproportionate influence corporations and lobbyists have had on the formulation of health care policy. In a recent television ad, he blamed the lack of universal health care in the United States on "drug companies, insurance companies and their lobbyists in Washington, D.C."

Just one year ago, however, he [Edwards] sang a slightly different tune. Asked in an interview with the progressive website MyDD if he would bring both corporations and labor to the table in an effort to formulate health care policy, Edwards declared:

"I think you try to bring everybody to the table. You want their participation, you want to make the system work for everybody. I think there's a difference between a healthcare plan that builds on the existing system but deals with some of its deficiencies and problems as opposed to a complete new way of doing healthcare in America. The latter will engender huge opposition. And it will engender a lot of just plain political opposition. If on the other hand you're taking the system that exists, dealing with the problems with it, making sure everybody gets covered, it's just much more likely to be achievable."

www.huffingtonpost.com

These accomplishments demonstrate that Obama has what Dillard, the Republican state senator, calls a "unique" ability "to deal with extremely complex issues, to reach across the aisle and to deal with diverse people." In other words, Obama's campaign claim that he can persuade us to rise above what divides us is not just rhetoric.

I do not think that a candidate's legislative record is the only measure of presidential potential, simply that Obama's is revealing enough to merit far more attention than it has received. Indeed, the media have been equally delinquent in reporting the legislative achievements of Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, both of whom spent years in the U.S. Senate. The media should compare their legislative records to Obama's, devoting special attention to their heart-and-soul bills and how effective each was in actually making law.


As all loyal posters/readers know, I've been an Obama believer for quite a while now. The canard about his legislative experience is just that, a giant, illogical canard. The experience Obama brings to the table has already enabled him to surpass the US Senate accomplishments of both Hillary and John Edwards combined. He authored and shepherded the most stringent ethics reform in history through Congress even though he was a member of the minority party.

If yesterday is indeed a precursor of things to come, then dealing with a Congress dominated by the opposition party won't be a problem come January 2009. But don't take my word for it, research Obama's history and fine-comb his record. Its far more extensive and impressive than most strident opponents would ever concede, but its a record of success in bridging differences in the very same moving vein as his eloquent speeches. There is substance behind the words, just look for yourself.

As a state legislator, Obama worked with both Democrats and Republicans in drafting successful legislation on ethics and health care reform.[34] He sponsored a law enhancing tax credits for low-income workers, negotiated welfare reform, and promoted increased subsidies for child care.[35] Obama also led the passage of legislation mandating videotaping of homicide interrogations, and a law to monitor racial profiling by requiring police to record the race of drivers they stopped.[35][36] During his 2004 general election campaign for U.S. Senate, Obama won the endorsement of the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police, whose president credited him with having been "immensely helpful in working with police organizations" on death penalty reform.

Obama sponsored 152 bills and resolutions brought before the 109th Congress in 2005 and 2006, and cosponsored another 427.[57][58] Obama took an active role in the Senate's drive for improved border security and immigration reform. Beginning in 2005, Obama co-sponsored the "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act" introduced by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).[59] He later added three amendments to S. 2611, the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act," sponsored by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA).[60][61] S. 2611 passed the Senate in May 2006, but failed to gain majority support in the U.S. House of Representatives.[62] In September 2006, Obama supported a related bill, the Secure Fence Act, authorizing construction of fencing and other security improvements along the United StatesMexico border.[63] President Bush signed the Secure Fence Act into law in October 2006, calling it "an important step toward immigration reform."[64]

Partnering first with Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), and then with Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Obama successfully introduced two initiatives bearing his name. "Lugar-Obama" expands the Nunn-Lugar cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons, including shoulder-fired missiles and anti-personnel mines.[66][67] The "Coburn-Obama Transparency Act" provides for a web site, managed by the Office of Management and Budget, listing all organizations receiving Federal funds from 2007 onward, and providing breakdowns by the agency allocating the funds, the dollar amount given, and the purpose of the grant or contract.[68][69] In December 2006, President Bush signed into law the "Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act," marking the first federal legislation to be enacted with Obama as its primary sponsor.[70]

As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. In August 2005, he traveled to Russia, Ukraine, and Azerbaijan. The trip focused on strategies to control the world's supply of conventional weapons, biological weapons, and weapons of mass destruction as a first defense against potential terrorist attacks.[71] Following meetings with U.S. military in Kuwait and Iraq in January 2006, Obama visited Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. At a meeting with Palestinian students two weeks before Hamas won the legislative election, Obama warned that "the U.S. will never recognize winning Hamas candidates unless the group renounces its fundamental mission to eliminate Israel."[72] He left for his third official trip in August 2006, traveling to South Africa, Kenya, Djibouti, Ethiopia and Chad. In a nationally televised speech at the University of Nairobi, he spoke forcefully on the influence of ethnic rivalries and corruption in Kenya.[73] The speech touched off a public debate among rival leaders, some formally challenging Obama's remarks as unfair and improper, others defending his positions.

In the first month of the newly Democratic-controlled 110th Congress, Obama worked with Russ Feingold (DWI) to eliminate gifts of travel on corporate jets by lobbyists to members of Congress and require disclosure of bundled campaign contributions under the "Honest Leadership and Open Government Act", which was signed into law in September 2007.[76] He joined Charles Schumer (D-NY) in sponsoring S. 453, a bill to criminalize deceptive practices in federal elections, including fraudulent flyers and automated phone calls, as witnessed in the 2006 midterm elections.[77] Obama's energy initiatives scored pluses and minuses with environmentalists, who welcomed his sponsorship with John McCain (R-AZ) of a climate change bill to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by two-thirds by 2050, but were skeptical of his support for a bill promoting liquefied coal production.

Later in 2007, Obama sponsored with Kit Bond (R-MO) an amendment to the 2008 Defense Authorization Act adding safeguards for personality disorder military discharges, and calling for a review by the Government Accounting Office following reports that the procedure had been used inappropriately to reduce government costs.[80] He sponsored the "Iran Sanctions Enabling Act" supporting divestment of state pension funds from Iran's oil and gas industry,[81] and joined Chuck Hagel (R-NE) in introducing legislation to reduce risks of nuclear terrorism. A provision from the Obama-Hagel bill was passed by Congress in December 2007 as an amendment to the State-Foreign Operations appropriations bill.[82] Obama also sponsored a Senate amendment to the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to provide one year of job protection for family members caring for soldiers with combat-related injuries.[83] After passing both houses of Congress with bipartisan majorities, SCHIP was vetoed by President Bush in early October 2007, a move Obama said "shows a callousness of priorities that is offensive to the ideals we hold as Americans.


en.wikipedia.org

Anyone care to say that Obama hasn't accomplished much in his two years in the Senate? Care to compare Hillary's record or Edward's beside Obama's?

In 1998, Obama passed the Illinois Gift Ban, which prohibited legislators, state officers and employees, and judges from soliciting or receiving gifts from a person or entity with interests affected by government. The Chicago Tribune called it "an ethics and campaign finance package heralded as the most sweeping good--government legislation in decades." The law also required greater campaign finance disclosure and limited the uses for which raised money could be spent. [HB672, 3R P 52--4--1, 5/22/98; PA 90--0737, 8/12/98; Chicago Tribune

Excellent thread, Tony!

Spud was largely unaware of his "heart and soul" bills beyond when he made health care more inclusionary, which Barack, quite rightfully, touts on the campaign trail as evidence that he's more than just a dreamer.

The "keeping the cops honest in interogations by requiring videotapes" thing was a real eye opener to the spuddish one.

The police tried to limit the videotaping to confessions, but Obama, knowing that the beatings were most likely to occur during questioning, fought -- successfully -- to keep interrogations included in the required videotaping.

In the place where Al Capone came from Barack is do this thing?

* long low whistle *

That's mighty impressive.

Spud has sed it before and Spud'll say it again injustice done to foster the illusion of a legal system that works is an abomination!

Spud recently watched the sad story of one, Mr Chatman, resident of Dallas Texas. The guy was charged with a rape he didn't commit. Cops over-eager to close the case put him in jail for it anyways. Twenty Six Fucking Years behind bars for a crime he didn't commit. Who the fuck gets 26 years for rape anyway? A black man in Texas accused of raping a white woman? 'Nuff sed.

The Innocence Project, a group whom Spud thoroughly supports btw, went to Mr Chatman and sed Hey, there is only enuff evidence left to do a DNA test to clear yer name once Do you wanna take the chance? He sed yes and indeed the DNA evidence exonerated him. The reason he spoent so ling behind bars aside fom the obvious and systemic racism that still exists in Texas toi this day was the fact that whenever he wsa brought before the parole board to show remorse for his crimes and descirbe wot happened he had to tell tham that there was no remorse because he never committed the crime and back into the slammer he'd go.

Spud mentions all of this because in Spud's mind a bent cop who beats a confession out of an innocent man or a racist judge who allows an innocent man to go to jail on too flimsy evidence is worse than an actual rapist.

Barack Obama's attempts to keep the cops on the straight and narrow path in Illinois shows the true stregth and depth of his character and also how effective he is as a legislator and a doer of good deeds not just a talker.

His succesful attempts to prevent the open bribery of officials and to increase tranparency in the political process in that state also speak well of the man's convictions and abilities.

Cops, Judges and especially politicians who argue for greater secrecy or argue against increased tranparency always make Spud a little nervous and more than a little suspicious.

Hell, look at BushCo as a case in point. The most secretive administration in the history of the country and they have done the worst damage too.

That aint a coincidence.

America so needs a man like Barack Obama to lead the nation towards a brighter tommorow and away from the evil mistakes of the Coporate Whores and War Criminals that are BushCo.

Strewth!

Obama/ Biden '08.

Be Well.

PS: If ya wanna read about Mr Chatman's exoneration here's the link.

www.statesman.com

An Obama Moment

In 1991, when Barack Obama was a third-year student at the Harvard Law School, I was serving as Dean of the University of Chicago Law School. I had heard through the grapevine that there was an extraordinarily talented African-American student at Harvard who was president of the Harvard Law Review and who was planning to come to Chicago after graduation to do public service law and to write a book about his experiences as a community organizer.

After checking with some members of the Harvard faculty, who assured me that this fellow Obama was, indeed, remarkable, I invited him to become a Visiting Law and Government Fellow at the University of Chicago Law School. This would give him support for his research and connect him officially to the Law School. He accepted, and over the next dozen years Obama became a Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School and a highly respected and much admired teacher of Constitutional Law, while at the same time pursuing his other interests.

In 2003, having served several highly successful terms in the Illinois legislature, Obama announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for the United States Senate. This seemed to me an utterly hopeless quest. Peter Fitzgerald, the Republican incumbent, seemed unbeatable, the Democratic field had already drawn several very strong candidates with more established statewide reputations than Obama, and Obama had recently failed in his effort to unseat Bobby Rush as the Congressman from Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood. Obama's candidacy for the Senate seemed pointless.

Shortly after Obama announced his candidacy for the Senate, I attended (and, indeed, co-hosted) a major fundraising event in Chicago for the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation. At one point, I spotted Obama moving gracefully through the crowd, chatting amiably with each individual, dutifully pressing the flesh. As I observed him, I thought to myself, "What a waste. This is demeaning. Barack should forget politics and become a full-time law professor. Then he could really make something of himself."

A few minutes later, I found myself standing next to Obama at the shrimp bowl. Although it was really none of my business, I decided to impart some of my wisdom. "Barack," I said, "I've been watching you out there, making nice to all these folks. Why are you doing this? Given the realities of politics, you know as well as I that there's no chance you'll get the nomination, let alone defeat Fitzgerald. Why don't you just pack all this in and accept a full-time position on the faculty?" Barack smiled and thoughtfully replied, "Geof, I know where you're coming from, but, you know, I have to do this. I believe I can make a difference. I have a responsibility to try." As he blended back into the crowd, I thought, "What a waste."

www.huffingtonpost.com

Spud has heard a lot of talk lately about how Hillary is allegedly about to take the kid gloves off and really lay into Barack Obama. Spud has also heard how Karl Rove and his ilk are preparing to do the same.

Spud sez this to them folks right now...

Remember Reagan?

Remember how they used to call him "The Teflon President"?

You know.. cos apparently nothing bad would stick to him?

Here's the dealio doubter folk...

Barack Hussein Obama is gonna make Rotten Ronnie Raygun look like a piece of flypaper in an outhouse by the time he's empowered.

Barack Obama is to politics wot Tiger Woods is to Golf.

Wot Micheal Jordan was to basketball.

Nothing but net!

Spud thanks you fer yer kind attention and time.

Obama/ Biden '08.

Be Well.

There was a scene in the Twilight Zone Movie where a hitchiker(Dan Ackroyd?) turns to the driver and says "Wanna see somethin' REAL scary?"

Here is that moment with The Reverend Huckabee...

www.drudge.com

Here are some fun factoids from last night's victory in Iowa:

* Obama beat Clinton among women 35% to 30%
* Obama beat Edwards among voters in union households 30%-24%
* Obama beat Clinton and Edwards among voters of almost every income level (Obama and Clinton tied among voters who make $15-30,000)
* As many voters age 17-29 as voters 65 and older participated last night -- in previous years senior participation has been 5-times greater than younger voters.
* Obama beat Edwards and Clinton among voters who want change (51%-20%-19%)
* Despite countless attacks and hundreds of thousands of dollars in negative mail, TV, and radio, Obama beat Clinton and Edwards (34%-30%-27%) among voters who say health care is the most important issue
* Obama won among those who said the economy was the most important issue (36%-26%-26%)
* Obama won over Clinton and Edwards (35%-26%-17%) among those who said Iraq was the most important issue
* Won across the ideological spectrum winning among liberals, moderates and conservatives
* Won among high income and lower income voters among voters with household income below $50,000 (34%-32%-19%) and among those over $50,000 (41%-19%-28%)
* Also won among the 82% of voters who said Pakistan was "very or somewhat important"

October 24, 2006

I have been surprised by how often Senator Obama turns up, sponsoring or co-sponsoring really good legislation on some topic that isn't wildly sexy, but does matter. His bills tend to have the following features: they are good and thoughtful bills that try to solve real problems; they are in general not terribly flashy; and they tend to focus on achieving solutions acceptable to all concerned, not by compromising on principle, but by genuinely trying to craft a solution that everyone can get behind.

His legislation is often proposed with Republican co-sponsorship, which brings me to another point: he is bipartisan in a good way. According to me, bad bipartisanship is the kind practiced by Joe Lieberman. Bad bipartisans are so eager to establish credentials for moderation and reasonableness that they go out of their way to criticize their (supposed) ideological allies and praise their (supposed) opponents. They also compromise on principle, and when their opponents don't reciprocate, they compromise some more, until over time their positions become indistinguishable from those on the other side.

This isn't what Obama does. Obama tries to find people, both Democrats and Republicans, who actually care about a particular issue enough to try to get the policy right, and then he works with them. This does not involve compromising on principle. It does, however, involve preferring getting legislation passed to having a spectacular battle. (This is especially true when one is in the minority party, especially in this Senate: the chances that Obama's bills will actually become law increase dramatically when he has Republican co-sponsors.)

So my little data point is: while Obama has not proposed his Cosmic Plan for World Peace, he has proposed a lot of interesting legislation on important but undercovered topics. I can't remember another freshman Senator who so routinely pops up when I'm doing research on some non-sexy but important topic, and pops up because he has proposed something genuinely good. Since I think that American politics doesn't do nearly enough to reward people who take a patient, craftsmanlike attitude towards legislation, caring as much about fixing the parts that no one will notice until they go wrong as about the flashy parts, I wanted to say this. Specifics below the fold:
obsidianwings.blogs.com

Prepare to be further impressed by what the MSM and netrooters continue to ignore. Why do you THINK people are backing Obama? There is plenty THERE, there!

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable