Data from a US government database reveal a six-fold increase in document shredding contracts between 2000 and 2006.
Menu
Front Page News Weblog Comments Flagged Comments User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Author Info
oldCADuser
Contact UserVisit Home Page
Joined 2006/05/20Visited 2010/02/01
Status: user
MORE STORIES
US Military Wrestles with Closeted Gay Afghans (62 comments) ...
GOP Offers Plan to Reduce Size of Party (49 comments) ...
CIA Agent's Pro-Waterboarding Claim Bogus (15 comments) ...
John Birch Society is one of CPAC's sponsors this year... (3 comments) ...
14,000 admit to tax-fraud - whistle-blower goes to jail (1 comments) ...
Special Features
Daily Nooner
Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.
This is not necessarily anything sinister. The Government shreds all sorts of stuff legitimately (instead of just chucking it in the trash). First they'll shred stuff with personal info (SSN, etc.) to avoid identity theft. They'll also shred stuff that has proprietary information from one of its contractors to avoid industrial espionage. And, of course, the most obvious is classified information. I think the Government is convinced that some spies are over here dumpster diving around its buildings. Their enforcement of the shredding policy certainly has gone up a notch recently.
Posted by Frosty at 2007-12-15 01:20 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
I'd like to see this broken down into Party affiliations and government offices. Let's just see who is doing the shredding. As FROSTY said much of th shredding is most likely just normal house keeping. But???
Posted by keith204 at 2007-12-15 11:38 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Their enforcement of the shredding policy certainly has gone up a notch recently. A notch of 641%? On top of the record rate of reclassifying documents previously unclassified? On top of not responding to FOIA? On top of classifying even the most mundane documents? On top of "losing" millions of e-mails? Nothing to be cynical about, of course.
Posted by YAV at 2007-12-15 11:49 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
A worthwhile read. "To judge from firsthand documents obtained by the ACLU through a FOIA lawsuit, we can guess what is probably on the missing CIA interrogation tapes -- as well as understand why those implicated are spinning so hard to pretend the tapes do not document a series of evident crimes. "More is still being hidden as of this writing -- as those in Congress now considering whether a special prosecutor is needed in this case should be urgently aware: "Through the FOIA lawsuit," write the authors, "we learned of the existence of multiple records relating to prisoner abuse that still have not been released by the administration; credible media reports identify others." More
Posted by Ray at 2007-12-15 11:56 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Good read. Well, not "good" - more painful than anything else - but worthwhile. Thanks Ray.
Posted by YAV at 2007-12-15 02:44 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Some unnamed staffer turn over a photo showing this conveyer belt passing through the offices of both Bush and Cheney and out on to the back of a truck parked behind the White House.
Posted by CalifChris at 2007-12-15 06:56 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.
Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable