Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, December 05, 2007

The U.S. Episcopal Church faces major tumult this week when an entire California diocese with more than 9,000 members decides whether to secede in an unprecedented protest over gay issues.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

ZEITGEIST, The Movie - Official Release - Full Film
video.google.com

The fist 10 or 15 minutes of Zeitgeist explain why people that follow orginized religion are such sheep.

This is how it should be.

The social constructs of Socialized religion is to follow the wishes of those who make up the organization.

Jeff
I watched the first ten minutes. This is what I observed:
-Lots and lots and lots of stock footage showing dead or bloodied people and explosions
-Crappy "dramatic" music
-A voice-over from someone unidentified (was he supposed to be famous? I really don't know...) claiming to be an authority on the "true nature of the world and how religion is a conspiracy to control the world" (my words)
-Another voice over from a comedian who, although he's really smart and I'm sure makes some good points, is primarily attempting to entertain people.

How you get "people that follow orginized (sic) religion are such sheep" out of that is beyond me.

And what any of that has to do with the article is likewise beyond me.

Once again, why should I care?

Sniper, we could careless about what you think, it is careless in all respects.

The fist 10 or 15 minutes of Zeitgeist explain why people that follow orginized religion are such sheep.

Posted by JeffnDenmark at 2007-12-05 07:44 PM | Reply





Which 10-15 minues are fist???? and quit being such an orginizer of poor grammar and spelling if ewe want to stereotype while grazing in the pasture of your biased own grass.


Baaaaaa.

So I made a mistake at what time in the film he talks abou the manipulation of religions and that was your reason to dismiss the whole kit and kabootle?
What ever dude...........

if they were going to suck seed, then would they be moving their organization to San Fernando Valley?

inquiring minds...

And you also miss the connection between a movie about how orginized religion manipulates people and a thread about an orginized religion.
Again.... What ever dude!

And the spelling police arrive!
I know there are a lot of educated grammer snobs on here, but so fucking what if my spelling sucks.
It's the meaning and intent that are the real issue.
Quit being so shollow!

Shallow.... Sorry spelling police....

I know there are a lot of educated grammer snobs on here, but so fucking what if my spelling sucks.


Jeff In Dumremark




Context dude, context. How edumacated can you be on the sheep film you claim to be a sheep film by being a sheep yourself by claiming the film about so called sheep is accurate if you spell grammer like the Frasier dude.

Hook ed on puh-hon-ix been gud to me.

www.youtube.com


And you MUST be a public school teacher from afar who escaped this country so you can smoke weed and date 15 year olds. But don't let me stereotype you.

Funny and another of those famous self defining bleats.

"Shallow.... Sorry spelling police...."

There should be a comma after sorry, Jeff, but we love you anyway. Indeed, we (the Drudgers who still care about peace, justice and the environment) usually think you have pretty neat ideas.

That said and done, there's nothing worse than an organized, dogmatic religion to bring out the ugliness in people. Luckily those who honor their ministers no matter whom those ministers sleep with, and those who have somehow concluded their their deity wants them to screw only on Thursdays, and standing on their heads, can always cross the street. Organized religion is like that. herm

Jeff
I watched the first ten minutes like you said. Don't get pissed at me because you said to watch the wrong part. After watching the first ten minutes, I wasn't about to sit down and watch an hour and fifty eight minutes of that crap on the off-chance that you told us all to watch the wrong ten minutes. If you have a different ten minutes that you think are especially poignant, find them and let us know. In the meantime, don't throw a temper tantrum because you told everybody to watch the wrong part of a two hour video.

Regarding your other post, I don't buy your, "The movie is about organized religion and the thread is about organized religion so there's a connection" argument. What does the video have to do with the possibility of the seventh largest Christian denomination in the country (
www.adherents.com) splintering over the issue of gay clergy? Using your argument, I could start posting anything from documents from Vatican II to Luther's 95 theses to the Mayflower compact and it'd all be fair game.

As for my "(sic)" when I quoted you, I'm going to apologize. It was (barely) uncalled for in the context. However, when you blindly call people of faith "sheep" using nothing but a video of questionable quality as support, you're pretty much bringing it upon yourself. If you insult people's intellectual integrity, you can hardly be surprised when yours is insulted in return.

And I'd like to disassociate myself from HRC_NOT. Although we both disagree with you for probably very similar reasons, I'm going to try my best not to lower my arguments to lame insults like "Jeff In Dumremark".

"...the whole kit and kabootle." JeffN

George Carlin did a funny bit about that topic. I looked online but couldn't locate the transcript.
en.wikipedia.org

Californian Episcopals May Secede?

Lessee ...Spud already used his "late night Jazz secession" joke yesterday and also the "Nothing secede like success" one too.

Ah, Spud has got it!

And how is this gonna effect Joe
Episcopo over in Jersey?

Wot? Too obscure? C'mon the guy was on SNL and STTNG fer crying out loud.

On Topic?

The Anglican and American Baptists Churches have already begun to split over this issue. Now the Episcopalians are getting into the act.

Deth is athiest/ recovering Catholic Spud and Spud is say right on to these folks who want their churches to evolve out of the dark ages and into the light of more moral and progressive beliefs.

Maybe after all the other Christian faiths have grown up enuff to admit the inherent hypocrisy and immorality of maintaining a homophobic doctrinal stance and become more inclusive the Roman Catholic Church will follow suit (in about ohhhh... a hundred years or so). Laws, they are a morally moribund and hidebound group of sinners.

Be Well.

Spud, nothing about you or your beliefs is more moral whatsoever.

If sucking childrens wee wees is more progressive then I guess thats you Tater of druel.

As for accepting openly gay people like yourself spudz it is comepletely again biblical doctrine. As much as homosexuals want to be accepted as they are in the church the final decision is really theres. Either give up a perverse immoral lifestyle or establish your own religion.

Knownothing,

it is comepletely again biblical doctrine.

No, it aint.

sucking childrens wee wees

Wow. Not only are you obsessed with gay sex to the point where you won't shut up about it, yer now into pedophilia too?

Damn dude, seek help.

Be Well.

Dan,
To bad you couldn't have gotten past the bad music and taken the information from the documetary. That would have been the most valuable part. I would also have appreciated to hear someone elses opinion on the info, instead of criticizing the music.
And Douchbag remarks are common on Drudge and I'm thick skinned enough not to be bothered by them.
People that attack because of spelling or make childish remarks are just showing how little they have to say.

Oh it' just the church. I got excited. Thought California was about to sucede from the Union. Bet no one goes to war over that one.

Jeff
I already commented on what was said in the first ten minutes. It was one guy who wasn't identified acting like an authority but providing no facts, and a comedian who was being simplistic and sensationalist in order to get laughs (I don't fault him for it, but it's certainly not the type of thing you could use to make a serious argument). To humor you, I'll address one point brought up by Carlin. He mentions money, how the church ("God") shouldn't need money, etc. I think the implication is that the church leaders are bleeding their congregations dry in order to turn a buck. Does this happen? Sure. I look at megachurches in affluent areas and wonder why they chose to spend their money in those ways (and the preachers are probably overpaid, too). In my personal experience in the Lutheran church, though, I see nothing of the sort. I see churches (individual congregations) regularly struggling to take in enough money to continue operating. There are of course bills to pay -- heating, electric, mortgage, etc. -- and people to pay -- janitors, secretaries, organists, educators, pastors, youth workers, etc. -- and outreach programs to finance -- food pantries, book drives, soup kitchens, etc. -- and the list goes on. The way I look at it is that churches have an option.

1-Go low budget on all aspects. Preach out of basements, give all money to the poor, have no special music, rely on volunteers for music, preaching, etc.

or

2-Actually pay a living wage to the workers in the church so you maintain some amount of professional and spiritual quality.

Personally, I think the second option is better. For one, a church is more likely to end up with a minister capable of putting scripture in historical, social, and spiritual context. Did you know that pastors (again going off my experience in the Lutheran church) go through four years of schooling AFTER they get an undergraduate degree? They learn ancient Greek, Hebrew, and sometimes Latin in order to translate primary documents. They study history, the Bible (naturally), and Christian writings from the last 2000 years. I think it'd be disingenuous to suggest that a church can maintain that kind of quality without paying a living wage. Oh, and that living wage, the starting salary, is generally less than what a public school teacher would start at...below $30,000 (depending on the area, of course).

Now, tell me why churches should be able to function without money.

Oh, and tell me which ten minutes I was SUPPOSED to watch for the earth-shattering argument on why people who follow organized religion are sheep.

Why would anyone want to be a member of any organization that has demonized people like themselves for centuries????
Churches may decide to let gay people be members but gay people do not need to lower themselves and do so. We have existed without the approval of any church for so long that I do not feel any need now for their approval or acceptance. I would think that they would consider excluding homophobic bigots before they begin asking gay people to be members.

Danni - I know you are bitter about organized religion, but not all churches and Christians are like that. I am both gay and Christian. There are denominations such as the United Church of Christ that openly welcome the GLBT community. They ordained the first openly gay minister in the '70's, and they actively support legalization of same-sex marriage, opposed DOMA and oppose any constitutional amendments promoting discrimination.

My home church in Dallas has over 4,000 members. And the congregation is about 90% GLBT. Yes, right in the Bible belt. Check them out sometime online - Cathedral of Hope.

You are entitled to feel the way you feel, but please don't denigrate those of us who are progressive Christians. I didn't go begging to any church to accept me. But I found one that welcomed me with open arms.

**** Either give up a perverse immoral lifestyle or establish your own religion.

Posted by YouKnewWho ****

......and that's how the Anglicans were born, when Henry, King of England, was not allowed to divorce another of his many wives by the Catholic Church, so he founded his own evil,perverted branch, the Anglican church......

......and then later,came the splinter groups of American protestants who split off from the Anglicans.......conceived in pervsersion, living in perversion......odd that they should be calling names.......

was not allowed to divorce another of his many wives by the Catholic Church

Actually, it was his first wife, Catharine of Aragon, that he wanted the divorce from.

The parade came later.

-- The History Police

"I didn't go begging to any church to accept me. But I found one that welcomed me with open arms."

That's fine for you, I'm glad but centuries of Christians persecuting gay people sort of sullied the religion for me. I'm not bitter about it, it's just that religion to me is irrelevant. Personally, I just really don't believe that "God" (whatever that really means) necessarily wants people to assemble in groups and praise him. I doubt that "He" is so egotistical that "He" really cares what we do in regards to "Him". To me religion seems to be something men have developed for Earthly reasons though they pretend it is to render "praise" for "God."

"Personally, I just really don't believe that "God" (whatever that really means) necessarily wants people to assemble in groups and praise him."

I tend to agree - I don't think God is particularly concerned about how we worship. The gathering in groups (congregations) is actually more about supporting each other and trying to grow in faith, understanding and spirituality (whatever your definition of those things may be).

......thanks Silver......

I'm all for Fresno seceding from California. Maybe Utah will take them.

This is interesting. A mostly-gay church in Dallas and a California church that wants to secede over the gay issue. Bizarro-World.

Being openly and continously gay is not christian. Neither is adultery, fornication, or the many other large sins listed in the bible.

Either you believe in what the Bible says is wrong and are willing to at least make the effort to try to stop or you don't.

If not then try somewhere else.

I don't understand those who try to change the christian faith to accept these perverse things that absolutely go against biblical doctrine.

If you are not happy with your church then leave and go elsewhere.

"Being openly and continously gay is not christian"

You are entitled to your interpretation, Gnubsy. If you believe every word in the Bible is the literal word of God, and you obey each stricture therein you have that right. I disagree, but at least you're not being a hypocrite, right?

I assume then, that you continue to observe the following:

(Ex 21:17 ) Whoever curses father or mother shall be put to death.

(Deut 1:20-21)"And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die"

(Lev. 25-44-46) However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.

(Deut 22:20-21)"But if this charge is true, and evidence of the girl's virginity is not found,
they shall bring the girl to the entrance of her father's house and there her townsmen shall stone her to death, because she committed a crime against Israel by her unchasteness in her father's house. Thus shall you purge the evil from your midst.

(Deut 22:22) "If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel"

Couple more Gnubs -

I feel bad for Barbara and Jenna is the surge is ultimately successful...

(Judges 11:30-39) "And Jephthah vowed a vow unto the Lord, and said, If thou shalt without fail deliver the children of Ammon into mine hands, then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the Lord's, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering. . . .

And Jephthah came to Mizpeh unto his house, and behold, his daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: and she was his only child; . . . And it came to pass at the end of two months, that she returned unto her father, who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed."

And which delicious dinner entree are you allowed to enjoy this evening?

A. Succulent pork chops and applesauce
B. Jumbo shrimp Scampi sprinkled with mixed herbs
C. A delicious rabbit terrine with calimata olives
D. Locusts

If you selected "D" you are correct, and bon apetit.

And please be sure to observe the literal Word of God as you decorate your home for Christmas this year...

(Jeremiah 10:2-8) "Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. . . . They are altogether brutish and foolish."

Enough?

SanAntonio - whaddya got about bunnies and chocolate eggs? It's never to early to plan for Easter!

Probably fine on the eggs (although not sure about chocolate... Luke 11:12-13 "Which father is there among you who, if his son asks for a fish, will perhaps hand him a serpent instead of a fish? Or if he also asks for an egg, will hand him a scorpion?"

Bunnies: pet 'em = yes. Eat 'em = no.

PS: I wonder why the idea of Easter scorpions never caught on?

San Antonio Rube,

If you had a measure of understanding of the Bible I might would listen to you.

There is nothing unclear or figurative when it comes to men like yourself sucking other mens wee wees. There is no place in the Bible where it is accepted. In fact in numerous places it is pointed out to be an abomination to God.

Now if you and the rest of the gay community don't accept the parts that speak against homosexuality as wicked and sinful then make up your own church.

Of course you will sooner or later have to start accepting the sheep fuckers, child fiddlers, poop eaters, etc. Because they will start to interpret your interpretation of what is perfectly acceptable to God. They will say they were born that way and can't stop. They will say God must have meant them to be that way and on and on and on.

YKW
I think they already did make up their own church. I think that was SanAn's point -- that there is a church that he goes to that accepts him. Whether you agree or disagree with his beliefs doesn't really matter, he (and his community) has done precisely what you asked of him.

"There is nothing unclear or figurative when it comes to men like yourself sucking other mens wee wees. There is no place in the Bible where it is accepted. In fact in numerous places it is pointed out to be an abomination to God."

Fine then YKW. If you believe what you just posted is the literal word of God and wish to adhere to it then fine. But you must also the believe in, and adhere to everything else, including the select examples I cited above.

Otherwise you are a H Y P O C R I T E.

PS: I liked it better when you used to call me Satan's Ragu.

Dylan - actually we didn't make it up. The United Church of Christ has been around for a long, long time. Its founders were the old Congregationalists (The Pilgrims). There's about 1.5 million of us.

San,
I figured as much. My point to YKW was that you had already found a denomination of Christianity to accept you, which I think is pretty much what he was suggesting (although in not-so-nice terms). Although I did not know the UCC descended from the Pilgrims. Isn't Barack Obama UCC?

"Isn't Barack Obama UCC?"

He is.

Comments are closed for this entry.

Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2009 World Readable